Mechanism of differential effects of antihypertensive agents on serum lipids

Secondary dyslipidemia: its treatments and association with atherosclerosis

Dyslipidemia is classified into primary and secondary types. Primary dyslipidemia is basically inherited and caused by single or multiple gene mutations that result in either overproduction or defective clearance of triglycerides and cholesterol. Secondary dyslipidemia is caused by unhealthy lifestyle factors and acquired medical conditions, including underlying diseases and applied drugs. Secondary dyslipidemia accounts for approximately 30-40% of all dyslipidemia. Secondary dyslipidemia should be treated by finding and addressing its causative diseases or drugs. For example, treatment of secondary dyslipidemia, such as hyperlipidemia due to hypothyroidism, by using statin without controlling hypothyroidism, may lead to myopathy and serious adverse events such as rhabdomyolysis. Differential diagnosis of secondary dyslipidemia is very important for safe and effective treatment. Here, we describe an overview about diseases and drugs that interfere with lipid metabolism leading to secondary dyslipidemia. Further, we show the association of each secondary dyslipidemia with atherosclerosis and the treatments for such dyslipidemia.

Genome-wide meta-analysis of variant-by-diuretic interactions as modulators of lipid traits in persons of European and African ancestry

Hypertension (HTN) is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Metabolic abnormalities, including adverse cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) profiles, are frequent comorbid findings with HTN and contribute to cardiovascular disease. Diuretics, which are used to treat HTN and heart failure, have been associated with worsening of fasting lipid concentrations. Genome-wide meta-analyses with 39,710 European-ancestry (EA) individuals and 9925 African-ancestry (AA) individuals were performed to identify genetic variants that modify the effect of loop or thiazide diuretic use on blood lipid concentrations. Both longitudinal and cross sectional data were used to compute cohort-specific interaction results, which were then combined through meta-analysis in each ancestry. These ancestry-specific results were further combined through trans-ancestry meta-analysis. Analysis of EA data identified two genome-wide significant (p < 5 × 10-8) loci with single nucleotide variant (SNV)-loop diuretic interaction on TG concentrations (including COL11A1). Analysis of AA data identified one genome-wide significant locus adjacent to BMP2 with SNV-loop diuretic interaction on TG concentrations. Trans-ancestry analysis strengthened evidence of association for SNV-loop diuretic interaction at two loci (KIAA1217 and BAALC). There were few significant SNV-thiazide diuretic interaction associations on TG concentrations and for either diuretic on cholesterol concentrations. Several promising loci were identified that may implicate biologic pathways that contribute to adverse metabolic side effects from diuretic therapy.

Highly potent antioxidant Olea europaea L. leaf extract affects carotid and renal haemodynamics in experimental hypertension: The role of oleuropein

Haemodynamic alterations in carotid and renal arteries are associated with the severity of target organ damage in patients with hypertension. Dietary habits, such as the Mediterranean diet, regulate blood pressure and oxidative stress, thus reduce the mortality rate due to cardiovascular diseases. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the reducing activity, antioxidant capacity and metal chelating ability of standardized Olea europaea L. leaf extract (OLE), and to test its (5, 25, 50 mg/kg) acute in vivo effects, as well as oleuropein's (OP, 10 mg/kg) on oxidative stress, carotid, renal and systemic haemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, peripheral resistance) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). OLE has a higher antioxidative capacity than BHT, higher reducing ability than vitamin C, and 23 times lower capacity for metal ion chelation than EDTA. All three doses of OLE, and OP, improved oxidative stress in SHR. OLE5 improved carotid and renal haemodynamics, without significant effects on systemic haemodynamics. Two different mechanisms of antihypertensive responses to OLE were observed, OLE25 was most effective in reducing cardiovascular risks by improving systemic and regional (carotid and renal) haemodynamics, peripheral and regional vascular resistance. OLE50 causes the improvement of blood pressure and cardiac performances, but tends to retain elevated vascular resistance, therefore, reducing the inflow of blood into the brain and kidneys of the SHR. The OP did not alter systemic or regional haemodynamics, suggesting others constituents responsible for changes of cardiac function, as well as carotid and renal haemodynamics in response to OLE50.

Enalapril/lercanidipine combination on markers of cardiovascular risk: a randomized study

The aim of this study was to evaluate enalapril/lercanidipine combination effects on markers of cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients. A total of 359 patients were randomized to enalapril 20 mg, lercanidipine 10 mg, or enalapril/lercanidipine 20/10 mg fixed combination. We evaluated blood pressure (BP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), lipid profile, lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE), soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40 L), serum myeloperoxidase (MPO), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). We recorded a decrease of BP in all groups, with the enalapril/lercanidipine combination being more effective in reducing BP compared with single monotherapies. Lipid profile or FPG were not affected by various treatments. Lercanidipine, but not enalapril, improved Lp(a) levels compared with baseline, with enalapril/lercanidipine having a greater effect on Lp(a) reduction. All treatments increased sRAGE levels, and decreased sCD40 L and MPO, even if enalapril/lercanidipine combination was more effective than single monotherapies. TNF-α and Hs-CRP were greater reduced by enalapril/lercanidipine combination compared with enalapril (P < .05 for both). The enalapril/lercanidipine fixed combination was more effective than single monotherapies in decreasing BP, but also in improving markers of cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients.

Metabolic effects of manidipine

The calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) were originally introduced as vasodilators for the treatment of coronary heart disease, but are now also noted for their clinical efficacy in the management of hypertension. Data from large clinical studies have shown that CCAs are not associated with the undesirable metabolic effects (e.g. worsening of dyslipidemia and reduction of insulin sensitivity) seen with older agents such as thiazide diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) that are used to treat hypertension. Indeed, reductions in cardiovascular risk and rates of onset of new cases of diabetes mellitus have been reported in trials in patients with hypertension treated with CCAs. These beneficial effects extend beyond those expected to accompany reductions in BP. Until recently, the biochemical effects underlying these metabolic changes were only poorly understood, but pharmacologic studies have now started to shed more light on these issues. Of particular interest are studies with manidipine, some of which suggest that this agent may be associated with greater improvements in insulin sensitivity and may have better renal protective properties than other CCAs. Confirmation of potential differences among CCAs in terms of the relative magnitude of any beneficial metabolic effects requires further study. Ongoing research is expected to clarify further the action of these agents at the cellular level and to assist with the optimization of antihypertensive therapy, particularly in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk profiles.

Single-pill telmisartan and amlodipine: a rational combination for the treatment of hypertension

Despite the well documented benefits conferred by adequate control of hypertension, the majority of hypertensive patients display suboptimal control and few patients achieve blood pressure (BP) levels <140/90 mmHg. As a consequence, combination therapy will be required in the majority of patients to achieve target BP. Fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensives not only simplify treatment regimens, contributing to enhanced patient adherence, they provide superior BP-lowering efficacy and an improved tolerability profile. Fixed-dose combinations have become the strategy of choice in high-risk patients or those with stage 2-3 hypertension. The combination of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) is a first-line combination that, in addition to its antihypertensive efficacy, reduces oedema, the main adverse effect of the dihydropyridine CCB and the main factor limiting their use. In morbidity/mortality studies, this fixed-dose combination has also demonstrated superiority over a RASI combined with a diuretic. The single-pill combination of telmisartan and amlodipine has been shown to produce a dose-dependent BP-lowering effect significantly greater than that of either agent administered as monotherapy. These findings have been confirmed by ambulatory BP monitoring in patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension, which demonstrated that single-pill telmisartan/amlodipine provides substantial 24-hour BP-lowering efficacy. A higher proportion of patients achieved 24-hour BP goals of <130/80 mm Hg on combination therapy. The superior efficacy of combination therapy has been demonstrated across a broad range of patients, including those with moderate-to-severe hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Moreover, combined use of telmisartan and amlodipine reduces the incidence of amlodipine-induced oedema, making it a preferred combination for the treatment of hypertension.

Use of carvedilol in hypertension: an update

β-blockers are effective antihypertensive agents and, together with diuretics, have been the cornerstone of pioneering studies showing their benefits on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as a consequence of blood pressure reduction in patients with hypertension. However, evidence from recent meta-analyses have demonstrated no benefit afforded by atenolol compared with placebo in risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and a higher risk of mortality and stroke with atenolol/propranolol compared with other antihypertensive drug classes. Thus, the effect of these agents on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients, especially their use in uncomplicated hypertension, has remained largely controversial. However, it is recognized that the clinical studies used in these meta-analyses were mainly based on the older second-generation β-blockers, such as atenolol and metoprolol. Actually, considerable heterogeneity in, eg, pharmacokinetic, pharmacological, and physicochemical properties exists across the different classes of β-blockers, particularly between the second-generation and newer third-generation agents. Carvedilol is a vasodilating noncardioselective third-generation β-blocker, without the negative hemodynamic and metabolic effects of traditional β-blockers, which can be used as a cardioprotective agent. Compared with conventional β-blockers, carvedilol maintains cardiac output, has a reduced prolonged effect on heart rate, and reduces blood pressure by decreasing vascular resistance. Studies have also shown that carvedilol exhibits favorable effects on metabolic parameters, eg, glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism, suggesting that it could be considered in the treatment of patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetes. The present report provides an overview of the main clinical studies concerning carvedilol administered as either monotherapy or in combination with another antihypertensive or more frequently a diuretic agent, with particular focus on the additional benefits beyond blood pressure reduction.

Effect of antihypertensive treatment on circulating endothelial progenitor cells in patients with mild essential hypertension

It has been reported that the number of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) reflects the endogenous vascular repair ability, with the EPCs pool declining in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. However, their relationship with hypertension and the effects of anti-hypertensive treatment remain unclear. We randomized 29 patients with mild essential hypertension to receive barnidipine up to 20 mg or hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) up to 25 mg. Circulating EPCs were isolated from peripheral blood at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Mononuclear cells were cultured with endothelial basal medium supplemented with EGM SingleQuots. EPCs were identified by positive double staining for both FITC-labeled Ulex europaeus agglutinin I and Dil-labeled acethylated low-density lipoprotein. After 3 and 6 months of treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) were significantly reduced. No difference was observed between drugs. An increase in the number of EPCs was observed after 3 and 6 months of anti-hypertensive treatment (p < 0.05). Barnidipine significantly increased EPCs after 3 and 6 months of treatment, whereas no effect was observed with HCT. No statistically significant correlation was observed between EPCs and clinical BP values. Our data suggest that antihypertensive treatment may increase the number of EPCs. However, we observed a different effect of barnidipine and HCT on EPCs, suggesting that, beyond its BP lowering effect, barnidipine may elicit additional beneficial properties, related to a healthier vasculature.

Current role of statins in the treatment of essential hypertension

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Hypertension and hyperlipidemia often co-exist and seem to be interrelated through common pathophysiological pathways. Drugs employing beneficial effects in both conditions could be advantageous in a concerted effective management of patients at high cardiovascular risk. Statins are known to enhance cardiovascular protection beyond their lipid-lowering capacity.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

MEDLINE was searched, up to January 2010, for studies assessing the effect of statin treatment on blood pressure control in various populations or animal models of hypertension. The potential mechanisms implicated in the putative antihypertensive action of statins are also reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

To learn about the role of statins as potential antihypertensive drugs in various populations. Clinical advice for the use of statins either as monotherapy or in combination with antihypertensive drugs in high-risk populations is also provided.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Statins may exert a mild, but clinically relevant, antihypertensive effect which is probably mediated by mechanisms that are independent of their lipid-lowering effects. Patients with high BP levels at baseline as well as those treated with ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers are expected to benefit more in this regard.

Carvedilol in hypertension treatment

Although β-blockers have been previously shown to effectively reduce blood pressure (BP) and have been used for hypertension treatment for over 40 years, their effect on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients remains controversial and its use in uncomplicated hypertension is currently under debate. However, data on the above field derive mainly from studies which were conducted with older agents, such as atenolol and metoprolol, while considerable pharamacokinetic and pharmacodynamic heterogeneity is present within the class of β-blockers. Carvedilol, a vasodilating non-cardioselective β-blocker, is a compound that seems to give the opportunity to the clinician to use a cardioprotective agent without the concerning hemodynamic and metabolic actions of traditional β-blocker therapy. In contrast with conventional β-blockers, carvedilol maintains cardiac output, has a less extended effect on heart rate and reduces BP by decreasing vascular resistance. Further, several studies has shown that carvedilol has a beneficial or at least neutral effect on metabolic parameters, such as glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and lipid metabolism, suggesting that they could be used in subjects with the metabolic syndrome or diabetes without negative consequences. This article summarizes the distinct pharmacologic, hemodynamic, and metabolic properties of carvedilol in relation to conventional β-blockers, attempting to examine the potential use of this agent for hypertension treatment.

Antihypertensive medications and their effects on lipid metabolism

Hypertension and hyperlipidemia are interrelated and share common pathophysiologic mechanisms, such as insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction. Accumulating evidence shows that it is important to regulate hypertension and hyperlipidemia to reduce cardiovascular risk. However, medications such as beta-blockers and thiazide diuretics, which are widely used for blood pressure regulation, are known to have several metabolic side effects. Despite deleterious effects on glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism, these medications have been proven to reduce cardiovascular risk. On the other hand, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and alpha-blockers have either no effect or favorable effects on the lipid profile. This review outlines the need to control hypertension, options for several antihypertensive medications, their differing effects on lipid metabolism, and the clinical implications of their effects on lipid parameters.

Effect of antihypertensive therapy on serum lipids in newly diagnosed essential hypertensive men

The effect of antihypertensives on serum lipids in newly diagnosed male essential hypertensive patients was studied. The participants (n = 99) were randomly allocated to receive amlodipine, atenolol, enalapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and a combination of amlodipine and atenolol. Lipid parameters were estimated before and after 8 weeks of therapy. The atenolol and thiazide group showed a significant increase in triglycerides (TGs) and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and HDL-C to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ratio were significantly increased and TC to HDL-C ratio was significantly decreased in the amlodipine and amlodipine- atenolol combination groups. In the enalapril group, we found a significant reduction in TC, TGs, VLDL-C, non-HDL-C, and TG to HDL-C ratio after treatment. It can be concluded from the present study that some drugs have beneficial effects on the lipid status, whereas others adversely affect the lipid status in hypertension.

Metabolic actions of angiotensin receptor antagonists: PPAR-gamma agonist actions or a class effect?

Accumulating basic and clinical data support the hypothesis that angiotensin receptor blockers have beneficial effects on glucose and lipid metabolism that are not shared by other classes of antihypertensive agents. These metabolic actions might only partially be shared by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Specific benefits beyond those of other angiotensin receptor blockers have been claimed for telemesartan and, to a lesser extent, irbesartan based on a partial agonist action on PPAR-gamma receptors. Although the evidence is strong in vitro, specific actions not shared by other angiotensin receptor blockers have not yet been convincingly demonstrated in vivo or in clinical trials. In many cases, a full range of doses has not been compared, and the apparent superiority of telmesartan could be an artifact of its higher receptor binding affinity, greater tissue penetration owing to lipophilicity, and longer half life.

Lipid-lowering actions of imidazoline antihypertensive agents in metabolic syndrome X

Agonists active at I1-imidazoline receptors (I1R) not only lower blood pressure but also ameliorate glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, and hyperlipidemia with long-term treatment. We sought to determine the possible mechanism for the lipid-lowering actions of imidazolines in a model of metabolic Syndrome X, the spontaneously-hypertensive obese (SHROB) rat. The acute actions of moxonidine and rilmenidine, selective I1R agonists, were compared to a specific alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist, guanabenz, with and without selective receptor blockers. Moxonidine and rilmenidine rapidly reduced plasma triglyceride (20+/-4% and 21+/-5%, respectively) and cholesterol (29+/-9% and 27+/-9%). In contrast, the specific alpha2-adrenergic receptor agonist guanabenz failed to reduce plasma lipids. Blocking experiments showed that moxonidine's actions were mediated by I1R and not alpha2-adrenergic receptors. To evaluate a hepatic site of action, radioligand binding studies with liver plasma membranes confirmed the presence of I1R. Intraportal moxonidine reduced plasma triglycerides by 23+/-3% within 10 min. Moxonidine inhibited hepatic triglyceride secretion by 75% compared to vehicle treatment. Tracer studies with 2H2O suggested that moxonidine inhibits de novo fatty acid synthesis. Thus, activation of I1R lowers plasma lipids, with the main site of action probably within the liver to reduce synthesis and secretion of triglycerides. More selective I1R agonists might provide monotherapy for hyperlipidemic hypertension.

Effects of oleic acid rich oils on aorta lipids and lipoprotein lipase activity of spontaneously hypertensive rats

Hypertension development in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) leads to vascular wall widening by smooth muscle cell proliferation. In these cells, triglycerides (TG) and cholesteryl esters (CE) can accumulate until they become foam cells. We administrated two oleic rich oils, virgin olive (VOO) and high oleic sunflower oils (HOSO), to Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) and SHR because these oils have been reported to reduce the risk for coronary heart disease in hypertensive patients and SHR. After 12 weeks of feeding, we analyzed the TG and CE composition and the lipolytic (lipoprotein lipase, LPL, and non-LPL) activity in aortas of these animals. HOSO increased the content of linoleic acid in CE and TG of aortas from both WKY and SHR as compared with animals fed VOO by proportionally decreasing the content of oleic acid. Conversely, VOO reduced the LPL and non-LPL lipolytic activities, hence limiting the free fatty acids available for the synthesis of TG and CE in the vascular wall.

Effects of hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol treatment on chylomicron metabolism in hypertensive subjects

Modifications in chylomicron metabolism caused by antihypertensive drugs were investigated in hypertensive subjects because previous studies had indicated that diuretics and beta-blockers modify the plasma lipid concentrations through mechanisms that were not fully understood. A triglyceride-rich emulsion resembling lymph chylomicrons, labeled with (3H) triolein and (14C) cholesteryl oleate, was infused intravenously into mildly hypertensive patients after 8 weeks on placebo and subsequently on hydrochlorothiazide (n = 10) or propranolol (n = 8). The residence time of both radioactivities in plasma was utilized for the simultaneous calculation of the particle remnant removal rate and of the lipoprotein lipase activity expressed as a delipidation index = 1 – [(3H) triolein residence time/(14C) cholesteryl oleate residence time]. Treatment with hydrochlorothiazide diminished the delipidation rate value whereas propranolol mildly increased the removal rate of the remnant particle. These alterations of the chylomicron kinetics were not accompanied by changes in plasma triglycerides, glucose, and insulin concentration as measured in the fasting state. The impairment of the lipoprotein lipase activity by thiazides and the faster removal rate of the whole particle by propranolol could explain the reason why in previous clinical studies the simultaneous use of these drugs does not aggravate the hyperlipidemia known to be induced by thiazides alone. Key words: hydrochlorothiazide, propranolol, hypertension, plasma lipoproteins, chylomicron metabolism.

Comparison of rilmenidine and lisinopril on ambulatory blood pressure and plasma lipid and glucose levels in hypertensive women with metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

In previous studies, the I1 imidazoline specific agonist rilmenidine effectively lowered office blood pressure (BP) in patients with metabolic syndrome, improved glucose metabolism and did not demonstrate unfavourable effects on plasma lipids. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of 12weeks therapy with rilmenidine compared with the ACE inhibitor lisinopril on ambulatory BP, plasma lipid and fasting glucose levels in women with metabolic syndrome.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Prospective randomised open-label, blinded end-points study.

METHODS

Female patients (n = 51) with hypertension and other components of metabolic syndrome were treated with 1 mg rilmenidine (n = 24) or 10 mg lisinopril (n = 27), once- or twice-daily. Anthropometric measurements, office BP and heart rate (HR) measurements, ambulatory BP monitoring, lipid and fasting glucose assessment were performed before and after 12weeks of treatment

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in ambulatory BP and HR, including 24-h, daytime and night-time values, and in lipids and glucose levels. All changes were adjusted for baseline values using the analysis of covariance method.

RESULTS

Ambulatory 24-h systolic BP and diastolic BP were decreased significantly in the rilmenidine group (-11.9 +/- 1.9 and -7.7 +/- 0.8 mm Hg, p < 0.001) respectively and the lisinopril group (-11.0 +/- 1.8 and -6.7 +/- 0.7 mm Hg respectively, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups. Rilmenidine reduced 24-h ambulatory HR (-3.6 +/- 0.8 bpm versus 0.3 +/- 0.8 bpm with lisinopril; p = 0.002). The reductions of day-time and night-time BP were also significant for both treatment groups, but the rilmenidine group demonstrated a greater decrease in night-time diastolic BP (p = 0.046). Rilmenidine significantly increased HDL cholesterol and decreased fasting glucose levels (p = 0.009 and p = 0.012, respectively). HDL cholesterol tended to increase and fasting glucose tended to decrease in the lisinopril group. However, differences between groups were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Rilmenidine has similar effects on ambulatory BP patterns in hypertensive women with metabolic syndrome as lisinopril. Rilmenidine compared with lisinopril significantly reduces ambulatory HR. In this study, rilmenidine and lisinopril demonstrate similar effects on plasma lipid and fasting glucose levels.

Hypertension and triglyceride catabolism: implications for the hemodynamic model of the metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if hypertensive adults have a blunted triglyceride catabolic rate (TG K(2)) and if related hemodynamic and vascular alterations are determinants of TG K(2).

METHODS

Fasting levels of insulin, glucose, lipoproteins and plasma catecholamines were measured in 10 normotensive and 10 hypertensive adults. TG K(2) was determined by an intravenous fat tolerance test. Forearm blood flow, maximum forearm blood flow and minimal forearm vascular resistance were determined by strain gauge plethysmography. Vascular compliance and systemic hemodynamics were measured by computerized arterial pulse waveform analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to normotensives, hypertensives had a significantly elevated blood pressure (145 +/- 8/94 +/- 11 versus 111 +/- 15/74 +/- 14 mm Hg, p < 0.001), systemic vascular resistance (1695 +/- 441 versus 1172 +/- 430 dynes x sec x cm(-5), p = 0.02) and reduced large vessel compliance (11.7 +/- 3.6 versus 15.1 +/- 3.1 ml/mm Hg x 100, p = 0.04). There were no significant group differences in TG K(2) (3.07 +/- 2.01 versus 2.88 +/- 2.12 mg/dL/min, p = 0.85) or other metabolic and anthropometric variables. TG K(2) was not predicted by the forearm vascular measures or the hemodynamic variables, but was correlated to waist/hip ratio (r = -0.71, p = 0.001), fasting triglycerides (r = -0.64, p = 0.003), and male gender (r = 0.56, p = 0.012). An enhanced TG K(2) was independently predicted by a reduced small vessel compliance (r = -0.61, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated blood pressure per se and hypertension-related hemodynamic and vascular alterations are not associated with reduced TG K(2) or other metabolic abnormalities. Rather, aspects of the insulin resistance syndrome are closely related to abdominal adiposity. The independent association between small vessel compliance and TG K(2) deserves further investigation.

Association of leucine 7 to proline 7 polymorphism in the preproneuropeptide Y with serum lipids in patients with coronary heart disease

Leucine 7 (Leu7) to proline 7 (Pro7) substitution in the neuropeptide Y (NPY) gene has been associated with higher serum total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, particularly in obese subjects. We investigated the frequency of the Pro7 allele and the association of the polymorphism with serum lipid levels in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). A total of 414 CHD patients (mean age 61 years, range 33-74) participated in the cross-sectional EUROASPIRE study. Of the subjects 39% used lipid-lowering drugs. The frequency of the Pro7 allele in CHD patients (0.082) did not differ from that in control subjects (0.071). The mean (+/-SD) serum total cholesterol concentration was higher in women with the Pro7 allele (7.57 +/- 0.57 mmol/L, n = 8) than in women with the Leu7Leu genotype (6.69 +/- 1.01 mmol/L, n = 69, P = 0.019), when subjects using lipid-lowering medication were excluded. In contrast, serum total cholesterol concentration did not significantly differ between the genotypes in men. The Leu7Pro polymorphism was not associated with serum LDL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride concentrations. In conclusion, the Pro7 allele in the NPY gene was associated with higher serum total cholesterol concentration only in women with CHD who did not use lipid-lowering drugs.