Ethnic Differences in Bone Microarchitecture

Bone microarchitecture and strength assessment in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta using HR-pQCT: normative comparison and challenges

Data on bone microarchitecture in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) are scarce. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess bone microarchitecture and strength in a large cohort of adults with OI using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and to evaluate challenges of using HR-pQCT in this cohort. Second-generation HR-pQCT scans were obtained at the distal radius and tibia in 118 men and women with Sillence OI type I, III, or IV using an extremity-length-dependent scan protocol. In total, 102 radius and 105 tibia scans of sufficient quality could be obtained, of which 11 radius scans (11%) and 14 tibia scans (13%) had a deviated axial scan angle as compared with axial angle data of 13 young women. In the scans without a deviated axial angle and compared with normative HR-pQCT data, Z-scores at the radius for trabecular bone mineral density (BMD), number, and separation were -1.6 ± 1.3, -2.5 ± 1.4, and -2.7 (IQR: 2.7), respectively. They were -1.4 ± 1.5 and -1.1 ± 1.2 for stiffness and failure load and between ±1 for trabecular thickness and cortical bone parameters. Z-scores were significantly lower for total and trabecular BMD, stiffness, failure load, and cortical area and thickness at the tibia. Additionally, local microarchitectural inhomogeneities were observed, most pronounced being trabecular void volumes. In the scans with a deviated axial angle, the proportion of Z-scores <-4 or >4 was significantly higher for trabecular BMD and separation (radius) or most total and trabecular bone parameters (tibia). To conclude, especially trabecular bone microarchitecture and bone strength were impaired in adults with OI. HR-pQCT may be used without challenges in most adults with OI, but approximately 12% of the scans may have a deviated axial angle in OI due to bone deformities or scan positioning limitations. Furthermore, standard HR-pQCT parameters may not always be reliable due to microarchitectural inhomogeneities nor fully reflect all inhomogeneities.

A novel non-invasive method for predicting bone mineral density and fracture risk using demographic and anthropometric measures

Fractures are costly to treat and can significantly increase morbidity. Although dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is used to screen at risk people with low bone mineral density (BMD), not all areas have access to one. We sought to create a readily accessible, inexpensive, high-throughput prediction tool for BMD that may identify people at risk of fracture for further evaluation. Anthropometric and demographic data were collected from 492 volunteers (♂275, ♀217; [44 ​± ​20] years; Body Mass Index (BMI) = [27.6 ​± ​6.0] kg/m2) in addition to total body bone mineral content (BMC, kg) and BMD measurements of the spine, pelvis, arms, legs and total body. Multiple-linear-regression with step-wise removal was used to develop a two-step prediction model for BMC followed by BMC. Model selection was determined by the highest adjusted R2, lowest error of estimate, and lowest level of variance inflation (α ​= ​0.05). Height (HTcm), age (years), sexm=1, f=0, %body fat (%fat), fat free mass (FFMkg), fat mass (FMkg), leg length (LLcm), shoulder width (SHWDTHcm), trunk length (TRNKLcm), and pelvis width (PWDTHcm) were observed to be significant predictors in the following two-step model (p ​< ​0.05). Step1: BMC (kg) = (0.006 3 × HT) ​+ ​(-0.002 4 × AGE) ​+ ​(0.171 2 × SEXm=1, f=0) ​+ ​(0.031 4 × FFM) ​+ ​(0.001 × FM) ​+ ​(0.008 9 × SHWDTH) ​+ ​(-0.014 5 × TRNKL) ​+ ​(-0.027 8 × PWDTH) - 0.507 3; R2 ​= ​0.819, SE ​± ​0.301. Step2: Total body BMD (g/cm2) = (-0.002 8 × HT) ​+ ​(-0.043 7 × SEXm=1, f=0) ​+ ​(0.000 8 × %FAT) ​+ ​(0.297 0 × BMC) ​+ ​(-0.002 3 × LL) ​+ ​(0.002 3 × SHWDTH) ​+ ​(-0.002 5 × TRNKL) ​+ ​(-0.011 3 × PWDTH) ​+ ​1.379; R2 ​= ​0.89, SE ​± ​0.054. Similar models were also developed to predict leg, arm, spine, and pelvis BMD (R2 ​= ​0.796-0.864, p ​< ​0.05). The equations developed here represent promising tools for identifying individuals with low BMD at risk of fracture who would benefit from further evaluation, especially in the resource or time restricted setting.

Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk among Older US Asian Adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding osteoporosis and fracture among older US Asian adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

Asian adults have lower (areal) bone density than non-Hispanic White adults and thus are more likely to be diagnosed and treated for osteoporosis, despite their lower risk of hip fracture. The latter may relate to favorable characteristics in hip geometry, volumetric bone density, and bone microarchitecture; lower risk of falls; and other clinical factors. The fracture risk calculator FRAX accounts for the lower risk of hip fracture among US Asian adults. However, data on major osteoporotic fracture risk remain limited. Fracture rates also vary by Asian subgroup, which may have implications for fracture risk assessment. Furthermore, among women receiving bisphosphonate drugs, Asian race is a risk factor for atypical femur fracture, an uncommon complication associated with treatment duration. Recent clinical trial efficacy data pertaining to lower bisphosphonate doses and longer dosing intervals may be relevant for Asian adults. More research is needed to inform osteoporosis care of US Asian adults, including risk-benefit considerations and the optimal duration of bisphosphonate treatment. Greater evidence-based guidance for primary fracture prevention among US Asian adults will ensure health equity in the prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

Is Osteoarthritis Always Associated with Low Bone Mineral Density in Elderly Patients?

Background and Objectives: The relationship between osteoarthritis (OA) and osteoporosis (OP) has been analysed for over four decades. However, this relationship has remained controversial. Numerous observational and longitudinal studies have shown an inverse association between the two diseases and a protective effect of one against the other. On the other hand, some studies show that patients with OA have impaired bone strength and are more prone to fractures. The study’s main objective was to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip (femoral neck) of postmenopausal women of different ages, with radiologically determined OA of the hip and knee, as well as to determine the correlation between BMD values and age in the experimental group. Materials and Methods: The retrospective cohort study included 7018 patients with osteoarthritis of peripheral joints and the spine, examined by a rheumatologist in an outpatient rheumatology clinic at the Institute for Treatment and Rehabilitation, Niška Banja from July 2019 to March 2021. A nested anamnestic study was conducted within the cohort study of patients, and it included two groups: an experimental group composed of 60 postmenopausal women, and a control group composed of the same number of women. Out of 120 patients, 24 did not meet the criteria for the continuation of the study (due to technical errors—radiographic and/or densitometry artefacts). Fifty-six postmenopausal women (aged 45−77 years) with hip and knee radiological OA were examined as an experimental group. The participants were divided into two subgroups according to age (45−60 years and over 61 years). The control group included 40 healthy postmenopausal women of the same age range, without radiological OA, with normal BMD of the hip and spine. All patients with OA met the American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria. OA of the hip and knee was determined radiologically according to Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) classification, and patients were included in the study if a K&L grade of at least ≥ 2 was present. Hip and spine BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: Compared to the control group, we found statistically significantly lower BMD and T-scores of the spine in older postmenopausal women: BMD (g/cm2), p = 0.014; T-score, p = 0.007, as well as of the hip: BMD (g/cm2), p = 0.024; T-score p < 0.001. The values of BMD and T-score of the spine and hip are lower in more severe forms of OA (X-ray stage 3 and 4, according to K&L), p < 0.001. We found negative correlation between BMD and T-score and age only for the hip: BMD (g/cm2), ρ = 0.378, p = 0.005; T-score ρ = −0.349, p = 0.010. Conclusions: Older postmenopausal women with radiographic hip and knee OA had significantly lower BMD of the hip and spine as compared to the control group without OA, pointing to the need for the prevention and treatment of OA, as well as early diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of low bone mineral density.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Bone Health and Outcomes in the United States

Osteoporosis is a bone disease classified by deterioration of bone microarchitecture and decreased bone strength, thereby increasing subsequent risk of fracture. In the United States, approximately 54 million adults aged 50 years and older have osteoporosis or are at risk due to low bone mass. Osteoporosis has long been viewed as a chronic health condition affecting primarily non-Hispanic white (NHW) women; however, emerging evidence indicates racial and ethnic disparities in bone outcomes and osteoporosis management. The primary objective of this review is to describe disparities in bone mineral density (BMD), prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture, as well as in screening and treatment of osteoporosis among non-Hispanic black (NHB), Hispanic, and Asian adults compared with NHW adults living on the US mainland. The following areas were reviewed: BMD, osteoporosis prevalence, fracture prevalence and incidence, postfracture outcomes, DXA screening, and osteoporosis treatments. Although there are limited studies on bone and fracture outcomes within Asian and Hispanic populations, findings suggest that there are differences in bone outcomes across NHW, NHB, Asian, and Hispanic populations. Further, NHB, Asian, and Hispanic populations may experience suboptimal osteoporosis management and postfracture care, although additional population-based studies are needed. There is also evidence that variation in BMD and osteoporosis exists within major racial and ethnic groups, highlighting the need for research in individual groups by origin or background. Although there is a clear need to prioritize future quantitative and qualitative research in these populations, initial strategies for addressing bone health disparities are discussed. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measured by HR-pQCT in Patients with Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis

Bone health in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis has been emphasized in recent years. Novel imaging modalities allow investigations into volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and bone microstructure in psoriatic patients. However, literature regarding vBMD measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) is inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate vBMD in patients with psoriatic disease. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for relevant observational studies. A random-effects meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed. The pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Five studies with 780 patients were included. Patients with psoriatic disease showed a lower average vBMD than controls (MD -14.90; 95% CI -22.90 to -6.89; TSA-adjusted CI -23.77 to -6.03; I² = 41%). Trabecular vBMD and cortical vBMD results were inconclusive because of the small sample size. Patients recruited in Asia and those whose vBMD were measured at the distal radius exhibited a lower average vBMD than controls. Further research should clarify the association of psoriasis with bone microstructure and the underlying pathophysiology.