Current Unmet Needs in Spondyloarthritis

International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS): results from the perspective of 5557 patients from 27 countries around the globe

BACKGROUND

The International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS) is a global initiative aimed to assess the impact and burden of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and identify the unmet needs from the patient's perspective.

METHOD

IMAS is a collaboration between the Axial Spondyloarthritis International Federation (ASIF), the University of Seville, Novartis Pharma AG and steered by a scientific committee. IMAS collected information through an online cross-sectional survey (2017-2022) from unselected patients with axSpA from Europe, Asia, North America, Latin America and Africa who completed a comprehensive questionnaire containing over 120 items.

RESULTS

5557 patients with axSpA participated in IMAS. Mean age was 43.9 ±12.8 years, 55.4% were female, 46.2% had a university education and 51.0% were employed. The mean diagnostic delay was 7.4 ±9.0 years (median: 4.0), and the mean symptom duration was 17.1 ±13.3 years. 75.0% of patients had active disease (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index ≥4), and 59.4% reported poor mental health (12-item General Health Questionnaire ≥3). In the year before the survey, patients had visited primary care physicians 4.6 times and the rheumatologist 3.6 times. 78.6% had taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ever, 48.8% biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and 43.6% conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients's greatest fear was disease progression (55.9%), while the greatest hope was to be able to relieve pain (54.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

IMAS shows the global profile of patients with axSpA, highlighting unmet needs, lengthy delays in diagnosis and high burden of disease in patients with axSpA worldwide. This global information will enable more detailed investigations to obtain evidence on the critical issues that matter to patients around the world to improve their care and quality of life.

Comparative efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in axial spondyloarthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks, a selective inhibitor of IL-17F and IL-17A, with those of biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) in non-radiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA) and AS.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials until January 2023 for inclusion in Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs), including three b/tsDMARDs exposure networks: predominantly-naïve, naïve, and experienced. Outcomes were Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)20, ASAS40 and ASAS partial remission (PR) response rates at 12-16 weeks. A safety NMA investigated discontinuations due to any reason and serious adverse events at 12-16 weeks.

RESULTS

The NMA included 36 trials. The predominantly-naïve network provided the most comprehensive results. In the predominantly-naïve nr-axSpA analysis, bimekizumab had significantly higher ASAS20 response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg [with loading dose (LD)/without LD], and comparable response rates vs other active comparators. In the predominantly-naïve AS analysis, bimekizumab had significantly higher ASAS40 response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (without LD), significantly higher ASAS-PR response rates vs secukinumab 150 mg (with LD) and comparable response rates vs other active comparators. Bimekizumab demonstrated similar safety to that of other b/tsDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

Across ASAS outcomes, bimekizumab was comparable with most b/tsDMARDs, including ixekizumab, TNF inhibitors and upadacitinib, and achieved higher response rates vs secukinumab for some ASAS outcomes in predominantly b/tsDMARD-naïve nr-axSpA and AS patients at 12-16 weeks. In a pooled axSpA network, bimekizumab demonstrated comparable safety vs other b/tsDMARDs.

What is the best referral strategy for axial spondyloarthritis? A prospective multicenter study in patients with suspicious chronic low back pain

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of referral strategies for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in patients with suspicious chronic inflammatory low back pain (LBP), to estimate the value of inflammatory back pain (IBP) for referral, and to identify the predictive factors of the final diagnosis of axSpA in Middle Eastern Arab countries.

METHODS

The study was multicentric, prospective, and conducted in LBP first-line clinics (rheumatology, internal, family medicine, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, and neurology). Consecutive adult patients aged under 45years were included in case of LBP suspicious of inflammatory nature according to the first-line physician. The rheumatologist's final diagnosis was the gold standard. The diagnostic properties of ten referral strategies (Brandt I, II, III, Hermann, RADAR, RADAR 2/3, MASTER, Braun, CAFASPA, and ASAS) and of IBP were calculated. A multivariable logistic regression identified the clinical predictive factors of axSpA.

RESULTS

In 515 referred patients, axSpA was confirmed in 48%, refuted in 43%, and diagnosis remained inconclusive in 9%. The optimal referral strategy was the MASTER (PLR 3.3), which comprises IBP, good response to NSAIDs, positive HLA-B27, and SpA family history. Considering strategies without HLA-B27, the RADAR 2/3 had a PLR of 2.9 (IBP, good response to NSAIDs, any extra-musculoskeletal manifestation). The predictive factors for axSpA were MRI sacroiliitis, positive HLA-B27, high CRP, psoriasis, IBP, and longer symptom duration. Of all patients, 35% were self-referred, 16% were referred by primary care physicians, and 15% by neuro/orthopedic surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Optimizing physicians' awareness of these clinical features may enhance referral in axSpA.

Diagnostic delay in axial spondylarthritis: A lost battle?

Diagnostic delay in axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) remains an unacceptable worldwide problem; with evidence suggesting significant detrimental impact both clinically on the individual, and economically on society. There is therefore, a need for global action across various healthcare professions that come into contact with patients living, and suffering, with undiagnosed axSpA. Recent estimates of the median diagnostic delay suggest that globally, individuals with axSpA wait between 2 and 6 years for a diagnosis - revealing a clear benchmark for improvement. This timespan presents a window of opportunity for earlier diagnosis and intervention, which will likely improve patient outcomes. This review describes the current diagnostic delay as estimated across countries and over time, before presenting evidence from published strategies that may be implemented to improve this delay across primary and secondary care, including for specialties treating extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA (ophthalmology, gastroenterology, dermatology). Ongoing campaigns tackling delayed diagnosis in axSpA are also highlighted.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors: A New Tool for the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the spine, peripheral joints, and entheses. This condition causes stiffness, pain, and significant limitation of movement. In recent years, several effective therapies have become available based on the use of biologics that selectively block cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of the disease, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-17, and IL-23. However, a significant number of patients show an inadequate response to treatment. Over 10 years ago, small synthetic molecules capable of blocking the activity of Janus kinases (JAK) were introduced in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. Subsequently, their indication extended to the treatment of other inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The purpose of this review is to discuss the efficacy and safety of these molecules in axSpA therapy.

The Use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Current Insights

Current pharmacological treatments of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and biological agents, including TNFα inhibitors and IL-17 inhibitors. Despite the availability of these agents, many patients either fail to respond adequately, lose their initial therapeutic response over time, or develop undesirable side effects, thus highlighting the need for new treatment options. Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) are a group of intracellular kinases that play a role in the signaling pathway induced by cytokines and certain growth factors associated with the inflammatory process of axSpA. There are several lines of evidence implicating the JAK–STAT pathway in the pathophysiological process of axSpA, including genetic data, the use of certain JAK in the intracellular signal of specific cytokines involved in axSpA (IL-23, IL-22, and IL-6), and data from experimental models of SpA. This provides a rationale for the assessment of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) in clinical trials with patients with axSpA. In this review, we examine the role of JAK–STAT signaling in the pathogenesis of axSpA and summarize the results from recent clinical trials of JAKi (tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib) in patients with axSpA.

Identifying parameters associated with delayed diagnosis in axial spondyloarthritis: data from the European map of axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To identify the parameters associated with self-reported diagnostic delay (DD) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients across Europe.

METHODS

Data from 2652 patients from 13 countries who participated in the European Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (EMAS) were collected through an online survey (2017-2018). DD was calculated as the difference between age at diagnosis and age at symptom onset reported by participants. Associations between DD and sociodemographic characteristics, as well as disease-related factors were explored through univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Average DD was 7.4  (8.4) years with a variation between countries. The variables associated with longer DD in the final multivariable regression model were: younger age at symptom onset (b = -0.26; 95% CI: -0.28, -0.23), female gender (b = 1.34; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.96) and higher number of health-care professionals (HCPs) seen before diagnosis (b = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.43). There was a significant interaction between the female gender and the number of HCPs seen before diagnosis. A substantial variation of the DD across European countries was observed.

CONCLUSION

In this sample of axSpA patients, average DD was greater than 7 years. Younger age at symptom onset, female gender, higher number of HCPs seen before diagnosis, and being diagnosed by rheumatologist were the parameters associated with a longer DD in axSpA. These findings indicate a need for continuing efforts dedicated to recognition of patients with a high probability of axSpA on the level of non-rheumatology specialists and facilitating referral to a rheumatologist for timely diagnosis.

Value-Based Healthcare in Rheumatology: Axial Spondyloarthritis and Beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and the wider field of rheumatology through a value-based healthcare (VBHC) lens. VBHC is focused on ensuring patients receive high quality care to improve outcomes and reduce unnecessary costs.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are many opportunities to apply the principles of VBHC in axSpA. These include the appropriate utilization of diagnostic investigations, such as HLA-B27 and magnetic resonance imaging, assessing outcomes meaningful to patients, and optimizing care pathways. Multidisciplinary care may improve value, and reduced specialist review and medication tapering may be appropriate. Increasing the value of the care we provide to patients can occur across domains and directly and indirectly improves patient outcomes. Taking the time to integrate principles of VBHC into our practice will allow us to justifiably gain and maintain access to diagnostic and therapeutic advances for the benefit of all our patients.

MRI-based Synthetic CT in the Detection of Structural Lesions in Patients with Suspected Sacroiliitis: Comparison with MRI

Background Evaluation of structural lesions in the sacroiliac (SI) joints can improve the accuracy for diagnosis of spondyloarthritis. However, structural lesions, such as erosions, are difficult to assess on routine T1-weighted MRI scans. Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) in the depiction of erosions, sclerosis, and ankylosis of the SI joints compared with T1-weighted MRI, with CT as the reference standard. Materials and Methods A prospective study (clinical trial registration no. B670201837885) was performed from February 2019 to November 2019. Adults were referred from a tertiary hospital rheumatology outpatient clinic with clinical suspicion of inflammatory sacroiliitis. MRI and CT of the SI joints were performed on the same day. SCT images were generated from MRI scans using a commercially available deep learning-based image synthesis method. Two readers independently recorded if structural lesions (erosions, sclerosis, and ankylosis) were present on T1-weighted MRI, sCT, and CT scans in different reading sessions, with readers blinded to clinical information and other images. Diagnostic performance of sCT and T1-weighted MRI scans were analyzed using generalized estimating equation models, with consensus results of CT as the reference standard. Results Thirty participants were included (16 men, 14 women; mean age, 40 years ± 10 [standard deviation]). Diagnostic accuracy of sCT was higher than that of T1-weighted MRI for erosion (94% vs 86%, P = .003), sclerosis (97% vs 81%, P < .001), and ankylosis (92% vs 84%, P = .04). With sCT, specificity for erosion detection (96% [95% CI: 90, 98] vs 89% [95% CI: 81, 94], P = .01] and sensitivity for detection of sclerosis [94% [95% CI: 87, 97] vs 20% [95% CI: 10, 35], P < .001] and ankylosis (93% [95% CI: 78, 98] vs 70% [95% CI: 47, 87], P = .001) were improved. Conclusion With CT as the reference standard, synthetic CT of the sacroiliac joints has better diagnostic performance in the detection of structural lesions in individuals suspected of having sacroiliitis compared with routine T1-weighted MRI. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Fritz in this issue.

Associations of Platelet Count with Inflammation and Response to Anti-TNF-α Therapy in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Background: Increased platelet count has been reported in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, but its clinical significance is still largely elusive. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical role of platelet count in AS patients, especially its impact on treatment outcomes.

Methods: A case-control study containing 35 AS patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) therapy and 45 healthy controls was performed, and AS patients were followed at least 6 months after anti-TNF-α therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies containing relevant data on outcomes of interest was also performed.

Results: AS patients had significantly higher platelet count than controls (p = 0.0001), and the significantly increased platelet count in AS patients was confirmed in a meta-analysis of 14 studies involving 1,223 AS patients and 913 controls (mean difference = 39.61, 95% CI 27.89–51.34, p < 0.001). Besides, platelet count was significantly correlated with ESR (p < 0.001) and was moderately correlated with ASDAS-CRP score (p = 0.002). Moreover, anti-TNF-α therapy could reduce platelet count in AS patients at the first month and the effect was maintained through the treatment duration. In the prospective follow-up study of those 35 AS patients, those responders to anti-TNF-α therapy had significantly lower platelet count than nonresponders (p = 0.015). Logistic regression analysis suggested that lower platelet count was associated with higher possibility of achieving good response to anti-TNF-α therapy in AS patients (odds ratio = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.06–4.82; p = 0.035).

Conclusion: This study suggested that platelet count was associated with inflammation severity and treatment outcomes in AS patients, and elevated platelet count was a promising biomarker of poorer response to anti-TNF-α therapy. The findings above need to be validated in more future studies.

Axial spondyloarthritis 10 years on: still looking for the lost tribe

Despite the publication of various recommendations, quality standards and referral strategies to promote early diagnosis in axial SpA (axSpA) over the last decade, there remains a significant delay to diagnosis, leading to a lost tribe of undiagnosed, untreated patients with persistent back pain and axSpA symptoms. This review discusses the various factors contributing to diagnostic delay in axSpA, while providing recommendations to improve the diagnostic pathway, for example use of the online Spondyloarthritis Diagnosis Evaluation (SPADE) tool (http://www.spadetool.co.uk/). Significant shortcomings exist at both the primary and secondary care level, with healthcare professionals often lacking knowledge and awareness of axSpA. Myths regarding the classical signs and symptoms still prevail, including the perception of axSpA as a male disease, only occurring in individuals who are HLA-B27 positive with raised inflammatory markers. Individuals within this lost tribe of undiagnosed patients are likely lacking adequate treatment and are thereby at risk of worse clinical outcomes. It is therefore vital that public health initiatives are implemented to improve education of healthcare professionals and to ensure early specialist referral, to ultimately improve the lives of patients with axSpA.

Wnt Signaling and Biological Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis

The Wnt signaling pathway plays a key role in several biological processes, such as cellular proliferation and tissue regeneration, and its dysregulation is involved in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases. Several evidences support its role especially in bone complications of rheumatic diseases. In Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), the Wnt signaling is implicated in systemic and localized bone loss, while available data of its role in Spondyloarthritis (SpA) are conflicting. In the last few decades, the quality of life of rheumatic patients has been dramatically improved by biological therapy, targeting cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases like tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-17. In this review, we reviewed the role of Wnt signaling in RA and SpA, focusing on the effect of biological therapy on this pathway and its possible clinical implications.