Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumors in Central and Peripheral Locations

Pulmonary Cytopathology: Current and Future Impact of Microscopy and Immunohistochemistry

With the advancement of tissue procurement techniques, in-depth knowledge of morphology is crucial for cytopathologists to diagnose neoplastic and nonneoplastic lung diseases optimally. Cytopathologists must also be well versed in immunohistochemistry/immunocytochemistry markers and their interpretation for an accurate diagnosis.

Absence of orthopaedia homeobox protein (OTP) expression is associated with disease spread and adverse outcome in pulmonary carcinoid tumour patients

Pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumours typically have a good prognosis, although metastases occur, and the disease may progress after a long period of time. Expression of orthopaedia homeobox protein (OTP) has been recognized as a possible independent prognostic marker in PCs. Immunohistochemical (IHC) OTP expression has been associated with better prognosis, but the staining has yet to be implemented in routine clinical diagnostics. In response to this, two new monoclonal OTP antibodies were recently developed.This retrospective study included 164 PC patients operated on at Helsinki University Hospital between 1990 and 2020. Tissue microarray slides, prepared from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded primary tumour samples, were stained with OTP IHC using one polyclonal and two novel monoclonal antibodies.Absence of OTP expression was associated with a shorter disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease progression (p < 0.001). Patients without OTP expression had a 5-year DSS of 73-79%, whereas 5-year DSS was 91-94% with OTP expression, depending on the primary antibody. In a univariable Cox regression model, absence of OTP expression was associated with adverse outcome along with atypical histological subtype, metastatic disease, Ki-67 proliferation index > 1%, and larger tumour size. In a multivariable Cox regression model, only absence of OTP expression and lymph node involvement at the time of diagnosis were associated with risk of worse prognosis. All three antibodies showed good concordance with each other.Our findings support the role of OTP as an independent prognostic marker in PCs and applicability of IHC staining in routine clinical use with novel monoclonal antibodies.

Bronchial carcinoid tumors in children and adolescents - A report and management considerations from the German MET studies

OBJECTIVES

Bronchial carcinoid tumors (BC) are exceptionally rare in childhood, with an incidence of <0.2/1,000,000 per year. Typical low-grade BCs are distinguished from atypical, intermediate-grade BCs. Little is known about BCs in pediatric patients and management guidelines are missing. In this study, we explored characteristics and outcome of pediatric patients with BC prospectively registered with the Malignant Endocrine Tumor studies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter study in children, adolescents, and young adults (aged 0-20 years) with BC reported to the German MET registry between January 1997 and December 2022. Data were last updated on 28 of February 2023.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were diagnosed at a median age of 15.0 years (range, 9.8-19.2). Atypical BCs (23.3%) were less frequent than typical, but more common than in adulthood. Lymph node metastases were present in 14.3% of cases (atypical BC: 28.6%, typical BC: 10.5%), distant metastases in one (3.1%) patient with atypical BC. 92.6% of patients were in complete remission after surgical resection (median follow-up: 2.7 years). The patient with metastatic spread and one patient with atypical BC and multiple recurrences were on treatment at last follow-up. 5-year event-free survival of typical BC was 100% and 83.3% in atypical BC.

CONCLUSIONS

Completely resected localized BCs in pediatric patients have a favorable outcome also with lung tissue sparing surgery. Atypical BC with risk of metastatic spread and recurrence occurred more frequently compared to adults. Interdisciplinary management and collaborative efforts are needed to improve our understanding and the management of pediatric BC.

Top 10 Histological Mimics of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma You Should Not Miss in the Head and Neck

BACKGROUND

The spectrum of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) of the head and neck region is wide-ranging and diverse, including a variety of diagnoses stretching from benign and low-malignant tumor forms to highly proliferative, poor prognosis neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Moreover, there are several non-neuroendocrine differential diagnoses to keep in mind as well, displaying various degree of morphological and/or immunohistochemical overlap with bona fide neuroendocrine lesions.

METHODS

Review.

RESULTS

While the growth patterns may vary, well-differentiated NEN usually display a stippled "salt and pepper" chromatin, a granular cytoplasm, and unequivocal expression of neuroendocrine markers such as chromogranin A and synaptophysin. However, these features are often less pronounced in NEC, which may cause diagnostic confusion-not the least since several non-NEC head and neck tumors may exhibit morphological similarities and focal neuroendocrine differentiation.

CONCLUSION

As patients with NEC may require specific adjuvant treatment and follow-up, knowledge regarding differential diagnoses and potential pitfalls is therefore clinically relevant. In this review, the top ten morphological and/or immunohistochemical mimics of NEC are detailed in terms of histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics.

Simultaneous pathological findings in biopsy specimens of patients with surgically resected lung carcinoids and their role in survival

Pulmonary carcinoid tumors are rare, low-grade malignant tumors that constitute 1–2% of all lung tumors. The present study aimed to describe the simultaneous pathological findings in biopsy specimens of patients with surgically resected lung carcinoids and determine their association with survival rates. For this purpose, 108 patients with resected carcinoid lung tumors were followed-up for 96 months and analyzed for simultaneous pathological findings in biopsy specimens. Among these, simultaneous pathological findings were found in 82 patients. The association between these findings and patient survival rates was evaluated. Atelectasis was a simultaneous finding in 52.4% of the patients, desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP) in 13.4%, emphysema in 24.4% and bronchiectasis in 9.8%. The survival rate was 100% for the patients with atelectasis, 81.8% for the patients with DIP, 90% for the patients with emphysema and 75% for the patients with bronchiectasis (P<0.05). According to the univariate analysis, the type of carcinoid was associated with patient survival with better survival rates for patients with typical carcinoids, while age, sex, stage and simultaneous pathological findings were not associated with patient survival. On the whole, there was a statistically significant difference in the survival rates of patients with resected lung carcinoids with different simultaneous pathological findings. However, further studies are warranted to assess the role of these findings in the survival of these patients.

Prognostic Significance of Pulmonary Multifocal Neuroendocrine Proliferation With Typical Carcinoid

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of multifocal pulmonary neuroendocrine proliferation (MNEP), including tumorlets and pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia, in association with typical carcinoid (TC), is still debated.

METHODS

We evaluated a retrospective series of TC with long-term follow-up data prospectively collected from 2 institutions and compared the outcome between TC alone and MNEP plus TC. Several baseline covariates were imbalanced between the MNEP plus TC and TC groups; therefore, we conducted 1:1 propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting in the full sample. In the matched group, the association of clinical, respiratory, and work-related factors with the group was determined through univariable and multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 234 TC patients underwent surgery: 41 MNEP plus TC (17.5%) and 193 TC alone (82.5%). In the MNEP plus TC group, older age (P < .001), peripheral tumors (P = .0032), smaller tumor size (P = .011), and lymph node spread (P = .02) were observed compared with the TC group. Relapses occurred in 8 patients in the MNEP plus TC group (19.5%) and 7 in the TC group (3.6%). After matching, in 36 pairs of patients, a significantly higher 5-year progression-free rate was observed for the TC group (P < .01). Similar results were observed using inverse probability of treatment weighting in the full sample. The odds of being in the MNEP plus TC group was higher for those with work-related exposure to inhalant agents (P = .008), asthma or bronchitis (P = .002), emphysema, fibrosis, and inflammatory status (P = .032), or micronodules on the chest computed tomography scan and respiratory insufficiency (P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

The association with MNEP seems to represent a clinically and prognostic relevant factor in TC. Hence, careful preoperative workup, systematic pathologic evaluation, including nontumorous lung parenchyma, and long-term postoperative follow-up should be recommended in these patients.

Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms: recent progress and persistent challenges

This review summarizes key recent developments relevant to the pathologic diagnosis of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, including carcinoids, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Covered are recent insights into the biological subtypes within each main tumor type, progress in pathological diagnosis and immunohistochemical markers, and persistent challenging areas. Highlighted topics include highly proliferative carcinoids and their distinction from small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the evolving role of Ki67, the update on the differential diagnosis of NEC to include thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors, the recent data on SCLC transcriptional subtypes with the emergence of POU2F3 as a novel marker for the diagnosis of SCLC with low/negative expression of standard neuroendocrine markers, and the update on the diagnosis of LCNEC, particularly in biopsies. There has been remarkable recent progress in the understanding of the genetic and expression-based profiles within each type of lung neuroendocrine neoplasm, and it is hoped that these insights will enable the development of novel diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers to aid in the pathologic assessment of these tumors in the future.

Recent advances and current controversies in lung neuroendocrine neoplasms✰

In the lung, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), namely typical and atypical carcinoids, and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), grouping small cell carcinoma (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), make up for distinct tumor entities according to epidemiological, genetic, pathologic and clinical data. The proper classification is essential in clinical practice for diagnosis, prognosis and therapy purposes. Through an extensive literature survey, three perspectives on lung NENs have been revised: i) criteria and terminology on biopsy or cytology samples of primaries or metastases; ii) carcinoids with elevated mitotic counts and/or Ki-67 proliferation rates; iii) relevance of molecular landscape to identify new tumor entities and therapeutic targets. Furthermore, a dispute about lung NEN development has been raised according to emerging molecular models. We herein provide a pathology update on practical topics in the setting of lung NENs according to the current classification (recent advances). We have also reappraised the development of these tumors by modeling risk factors and natural history of disease (recent controversies). Combining recent advances and controversies may help clarify our biological understanding of lung NENs and give practical information for the clinical decision-making process.

Recent advances and conceptual changes in the classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus

Neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus (TNET) are exceedingly rare neoplasms. Their histomorphology is identical to neuroendocrine tumors elsewhere in the body (in particular the lungs) and bears no similarity with thymomas and thymic carcinomas. Recent molecular findings have profoundly changed our perception of these tumors and may impact future histological classification systems.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

Pathologic Considerations in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This review serves as a primer on contemporary neuroendocrine neoplasm classification, with an emphasis on gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Topics discussed include general features of neuroendocrine neoplasms, general neuroendocrine marker immunohistochemistry, the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor from pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and other diagnostic mimics and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma from diagnostic mimics, the concepts of differentiation and grade and the application of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry to determine the latter, the various WHO classifications of neuroendocrine neoplasms including the 2019 WHO classification of gastroenteropancreatic tumors, organ-specific considerations for gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, immunohistochemistry to determine site of origin in metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of occult origin, immunohistochemistry in the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and, finally, required and recommended reporting elements for biopsies and resections of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms.

Immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: what can brown do for you?

This review is based on a presentation given at the Hans Popper Hepatopathology Society companion meeting at the 2019 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Annual Meeting. It presents updates on the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with an emphasis on the role of immunohistochemistry. Neuroendocrine neoplasms often present in liver biopsies as metastases of occult origin. Specific topics covered include 1. general features of neuroendocrine neoplasms, 2. general neuroendocrine marker immunohistochemistry, with discussion of the emerging marker INSM1, 3. non-small cell carcinoma with (occult) neuroendocrine differentiation, 4. the WHO Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with discussion of the 2019 classification of gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms, 5. use of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, 6. immunohistochemistry to assign site of origin in neuroendocrine metastasis of occult origin, 7. immunohistochemistry to distinguish well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, 8. lesions frequently misdiagnosed as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, and 9. required and recommended data elements for biopsies and resections with associated immunohistochemical stains. Next-generation immunohistochemistry, including lineage-restricted transcription factors (e.g., CDX2, islet 1, OTP, SATB2) and protein correlates of molecular genetic events (e.g., p53, Rb), is indispensable for the accurate diagnosis and classification of these neoplasms.

Ki-67 Labeling Index in Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumors: Comparison Between Small Biopsy and Resection Using Tumor Tracing and Hot Spot Methods

CONTEXT.—

Pulmonary carcinoids are classified as typical or atypical by assessing necrosis and mitoses, which usually cannot be adequately assessed on small biopsies. Ki-67 is not currently used to grade pulmonary carcinoids, but it may be helpful to determine preliminary grade in biopsies. However, the rate at which Ki-67 could underestimate or overestimate grade on small biopsies has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVE.—

To compare Ki-67 labeling obtained on small biopsies to subsequent resection.

DESIGN.—

Ki-67 was performed on paired biopsy and resection specimens from 55 patients. Slides were scanned using Aperio ScanScope. Labeling index was determined using automated hot spot and tumor tracing methods.

RESULTS.—

The study included 41 typical and 14 atypical carcinoids. Atypical carcinoids were larger and had more distant metastases. Death from disease occurred in 3 patients (all had atypical carcinoids). Median hot spot Ki-67 labeling index was greater in resection compared with biopsy by 0.7% (P = .02). Median tumor tracing Ki-67 was lower in resection compared with biopsy by 0.5% (P < .001). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed similar hot spot Ki-67 cutoffs to predict atypical histology (3.5% for biopsy, 3.6% for resection; area under the curve [AUC], 0.75 and 0.74, respectively). Different optimal cutoffs were needed for tracing method based on biopsy (2.1%; AUC, 0.75) compared with resection (1.0%; AUC, 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS.—

Hot spot Ki-67 tends to underestimate grade on small biopsies, whereas grade is overestimated by tumor tracing. Hot spot Ki-67 cutoff of 3.5% predicted atypical histology for both biopsy and resection. Different biopsy and resection cutoffs were necessary for tumor tracing, which would make clinical implementation more difficult.

Capecitabine and Temozolomide in Patients with Advanced Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumours

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide and capecitabine (CAPTEM) chemotherapy is known to be active in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective analysis set out to describe the efficacy and toxicity of CAPTEM in patients with advanced pulmonary carcinoids (PCs).

METHODS

Patients were included with advanced PC who had been treated with a maximum of 6 cycles of oral temozolomide 200 mg/m2 on days 10-14 and capecitabine 750 mg/m2 b.i.d. on days 1-14, repeated every 28 days, -followed by monthly intramuscular injection of octreotide 30 mg long-acting release as maintenance treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 33 patients, all with well-differentiated PC, 61% had atypical carcinoid, 36% had Ki-67 index >10% and 42% had ≥3 organs involved by metastasis. CAPTEM was administered as first-line treatment in 42% of patients, and 17% had received prior somatostatin analogue treatment. Six patients (18%) achieved a partial response, 19 (58%) had stable disease and 8 (24%) developed progressive disease. After a median time of follow-up of 34.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.0 months and median overall survival 30.4 months. Median duration of disease response was 21.7 months and median duration of disease control 9.7 months. Patients with multi-organ metastasis had shorter PFS, but only when treated as second or third line with CAPTEM (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

CAPTEM induced a modest response and PFS rate, comparable to other studies with temozolomide in patients with advanced PC. The efficacy of CAPTEM should be compared to that of monotherapy with temozolomide in a prospective clinical trial.

Orthopedia Homeobox (OTP) in Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Diagnostic Value and Possible Molecular Interactions

Generally, patients with stage I-IIIa (TNM) pulmonary carcinoid disease have a favourable prognosis after curative resection. Yet, distant recurrence of disease after curative surgery occurs in approximately 1–6% of patients with typical carcinoid and 14–29% in patients with atypical carcinoid disease, respectively. Known predictors of distant recurrence of disease are atypical carcinoid, lymphatic involvement, and incomplete resection status. However, none of them can be reliably used, alone or in combination, to exclude patients from long-term follow-up (advised 15 years). By genomic profiling, Orthopedia homeobox (OTP) has been identified as a promising prognostic marker for pulmonary carcinoid with a favourable prognosis and low risk of distant disease recurrence. Moreover, OTP is a highly specific marker for carcinoids of pulmonary origin and recent genome wide analysis has identified OTP as a crucial predictor of aggressive tumor behaviour. OTP in combination with CD44, a stem cell marker and cell-surface protein, enables the identification of patients with surgical resected carcinoid disease that could potentially be excluded from long-term follow-up. In future clinical practice OTP may enable clinicians to reduce the diagnostic burden and related distress and reduce costs of long-term radiological assessments in patients with a pulmonary carcinoid. This review addresses the current clinical value of OTP and the possible molecular mechanisms regulating OTP expression and function in pulmonary carcinoids.

Orthopedia homeobox protein (OTP) is a sensitive and specific marker for primary pulmonary carcinoid tumors in cytologic and surgical specimens

INTRODUCTION

Orthopedia homeobox protein (OTP) was recently demonstrated to be a pulmonary neuroendocrine marker showing specificity for pulmonary carcinoid tumors in histologic sections. Little is known of OTP performance and specificity for pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors in lung fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cell blocks (CBs), however.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated OTP expression in lung non-neuroendocrine and neuroendocrine tumor CBs to determine its diagnostic utility in these specimens. Pulmonary typical carcinoid (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) CBs were retrieved along with matched surgical cases and assessed for nuclear OTP expression with immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Nuclear OTP was seen in 82% TCs (9 of 11) and 83% ACs (10 of 12), but not in SCLC (0 of 9), LCNEC (0 of 9), SQ (0 of 10) or ADC (0 of 6) cytology cases. Similar to the cytologic specimens, nuclear OTP was seen in 82% TCs (9 of 11) and 80% ACs (8 of 10) but in none of the SCLC (0 of 8), LCNEC (0 of 7), SQ (0 of 8) or ADC (0 of 6) resections. Both AC and TC CBs showed a similar percentage of cells expressing nuclear OTP. By contrast, in resection specimens, 30% ACs (3 of 10) compared with 73% TC (8 of 11) cases showed >40% of cells nuclear OTP staining. Nuclear OTP demonstrated 80-83% sensitivity and 100% specificity for pulmonary carcinoid tumors in cytology and surgical specimens.

CONCLUSION

In the context of pulmonary malignancies, nuclear OTP immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific in distinguishing carcinoid tumors from other pulmonary neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine malignancies in cytologic and surgical specimens.