The Incidence of Meningitis in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing External Ventricular Drain Placement: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis

Risk Factors for External Ventricular Drainage-Related Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background and Objectives

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is one of the most commonly performed neurosurgical procedures, but EVD-related infection constitutes a significant health concern. Yet, little consensus identifies the risk factors for the development of EVD-related infection. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically summarize existing evidence on the incidence and risk factors for EVD-related infection.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from database inception to February 28, 2022, were searched for all studies investigating the incidence and risk factors for EVD-related infection. Data were assessed by R-4.2.0 software. The meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

A total of 48 studies were included. Among the 29 factors analyzed, statistically significant risk factors were subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH)/intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH) (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.20-1.82, p < 0.001), concomitant systemic infection (OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.34-2.70, p < 0.001), other neurosurgical procedures (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.02-3.04, p = 0.041), change of catheter (OR = 5.05, 95% CI = 3.67-6.96, p < 0.001), bilateral EVDs (OR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.03-4.89, p = 0.041), (cerebrospinal fluid) CSF leak (OR = 3.19, 95% CI = 2.12-4.81, p < 0.001) and duration of EVD >7 days (OR = 4.62, 95% CI = 2.26-9.43, p < 0.001). The use of silver-coated catheters (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.38-0.87, p = 0.008) and antibiotic-impregnated catheters (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41-0.88, p = 0.009) might help reduce the risk of infection. No significant difference was indicated in studies evaluating factors like diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.90-1.75, p = 0.178), steroids used (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 0.96-2.4, p = 0.074), prophylactic antibiotics(OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.66-1.14, p = 0.308).

Discussion

The meta-analysis of various relevant factors in the onset of EVD-related infection in patients submitted to EVD enabled us to establish a more probable profile of the patients who are more likely to develop it during the treatment.

Postprocedural Complications of External Ventricular Drains: A Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Absolute Risk of Hemorrhages, Infections, and Revisions

BACKGROUND

External ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is often a lifesaving procedure frequently used in neurosurgical emergencies. It is routinely done at the bedside in the neurocritical care unit or in the emergency room. However, there are infectious and noninfectious complications associated with this procedure. This meta-analysis sought to evaluate the absolute risk associated with EVD hemorrhages, infections, and revisions. The secondary purpose was to identify and characterize risk factors for EVD complications.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed) database for "external ventricular drain," "external ventricular drain" + "complications" or "Hemorrhage" or "Infection" or "Revision" irrespective of publication year. Estimates from individual studies were combined using a random effects model, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with maximum likelihood specification. To investigate heterogeneity, the t2 and I2 tests were utilized. To evaluate for publication bias, a funnel plot was developed.

RESULTS

There were 260 total studies screened from our PubMed literature database search, with 176 studies selected for full-text review, and all of these 176 studies were included in the meta-analysis as they met the inclusion criteria. A total of 132,128 EVD insertions were reported, with a total of 130,609 participants having at least one EVD inserted. The pooled absolute risk (risk difference) and percentage of the total variability due to true heterogeneity (I2) for hemorrhagic complication was 1236/10,203 (risk difference: -0.63; 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.60; I2: 97.8%), infectious complication was 7278/125,909 (risk difference: -0.65; 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.64; I2: 99.7%), and EVD revision was 674/4416 (risk difference: -0.58; 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.51; I2: 98.5%). On funnel plot analysis, we had a variety of symmetrical plots, and asymmetrical plots, suggesting no bias in larger studies, and the lack of positive effects/methodological quality in smaller studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, these findings provide valuable information regarding the safety of one of the most important and most common neurosurgical procedures, EVD insertion. Implementing best-practice standards is recommended in order to reduce EVD-related complications. There is a need for more in-depth research into the independent risk factors associated with these complications, as well as confirmation of these findings by well-structured prospective studies.

Incidence of emergency neurosurgical TBI procedures: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The rates of emergency neurosurgery in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients vary between populations and trauma centers. In planning acute TBI treatment, knowledge about rates and incidence of emergency neurosurgery at the population level is of importance for organization and planning of specialized health care services. This study aimed to present incidence rates and patient characteristics for the most common TBI-related emergency neurosurgical procedures.

METHODS

Oslo University Hospital is the only trauma center with neurosurgical services in Southeast Norway, which has a population of 3 million. We extracted prospectively collected registry data from the Oslo TBI Registry - Neurosurgery over a five-year period (2015-2019). Incidence was calculated in person-pears (crude) and age-adjusted for standard population. We conducted multivariate multivariable logistic regression models to assess variables associated with emergency neurosurgical procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 2151 patients with pathological head CT scans were included. One or more emergency neurosurgical procedure was performed in 27% of patients. The crude incidence was 3.9/100,000 person-years. The age-adjusted incidences in the standard population for Europe and the world were 4.0/100,000 and 3.3/100,000, respectively. The most frequent emergency neurosurgical procedure was the insertion of an intracranial pressure monitor, followed by evacuation of the mass lesion. Male sex, road traffic accidents, severe injury (low Glasgow coma score) and CT characteristics such as midline shift and compressed/absent basal cisterns were significantly associated with an increased probability of emergency neurosurgery, while older age was associated with a decreased probability.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of emergency neurosurgery in the general population is low and reflects neurosurgery procedures performed in patients with severe injuries. Hence, emergency neurosurgery for TBIs should be centralized to major trauma centers.

Cross-sectional study of major procedure codes among hospitalized patients with traumatic brain injury by level of injury severity in the 2004 to 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Despite its public health significance, TBI management across US healthcare institutions and patient characteristics with an emphasis on utilization and outcomes of TBI-specific procedures have not been evaluated at the national level.We aimed to characterize top 10 procedure codes among hospitalized adults with TBI as primary diagnosis by injury severity.A Cross-sectional study was conducted using 546, 548 hospitalization records from the 2004 to 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample were analyzed.Data elements of interest included injury, patient, hospital characteristics, procedures, in-hospital death and length of stay.Ten top procedure codes were "Closure of skin and subcutaneous tissue of other sites", "Insertion of endotracheal tube", "Continuous invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 96 consecutive hours", "Venous catheterization (not elsewhere classified)", "Continuous invasive mechanical ventilation for 96 consecutive hours or more", "Transfusion of packed cells", "Incision of cerebral meninges", "Serum transfusion (not elsewhere classified)", "Temporary tracheostomy", and "Arterial catherization". Prevalence rates ranged between 3.1% and 15.5%, with variations according to injury severity and over time. Whereas "Closure of skin and subcutaneous tissue of other sites" was associated with fewer in-hospital deaths and shorter hospitalizations, "Temporary tracheostomy" was associated with fewer in-hospital deaths among moderate-to-severe TBI patients, and "Continuous invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 96 consecutive hours" was associated with shorter hospitalizations among severe TBI patients. Other procedures were associated with worse outcomes.Nationwide, the most frequently reported hospitalization procedure codes among TBI patients aimed at homeostatic stabilization and differed in prevalence, trends, and outcomes according to injury severity.

Management and Challenges of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability in trauma patients, and can be classified into mild, moderate, and severe by the Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Prehospital, initial emergency department, and subsequent intensive care unit (ICU) management of severe TBI should focus on avoiding secondary brain injury from hypotension and hypoxia, with appropriate reversal of anticoagulation and surgical evacuation of mass lesions as indicated. Utilizing principles based on the Monro-Kellie doctrine and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), a surrogate for cerebral blood flow (CBF) should be maintained by optimizing mean arterial pressure (MAP), through fluids and vasopressors, and/or decreasing intracranial pressure (ICP), through bedside maneuvers, sedation, hyperosmolar therapy, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage, and, in refractory cases, barbiturate coma or decompressive craniectomy (DC). While controversial, direct ICP monitoring, in conjunction with clinical examination and imaging as indicated, should help guide severe TBI therapy, although new modalities, such as brain tissue oxygen (PbtO₂) monitoring, show great promise in providing strategies to optimize CBF. Optimization of the acute care of severe TBI should include recognition and treatment of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH), early seizure prophylaxis, venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, and nutrition optimization. Despite this, severe TBI remains a devastating injury and palliative care principles should be applied early. To better affect the challenging long-term outcomes of severe TBI, more and continued high quality research is required.

Two latent classes of diagnostic and treatment procedures among traumatic brain injury inpatients

To characterize latent classes of diagnostic and/or treatment procedures among hospitalized U.S. adults, 18-64 years, with primary diagnosis of TBI from 2004-2014 Nationwide Inpatient Samples, latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to 10 procedure groups and differences between latent classes on injury, patient, hospital and healthcare utilization outcome characteristics were modeled using multivariable regression. Using 266,586 eligible records, LCA resulted in two classes of hospitalizations, namely, class I (n = 217,988) (mostly non-surgical) and class II (n = 48,598) (mostly surgical). Whereas orthopedic procedures were equally likely among latent classes, skin-related, physical medicine and rehabilitation procedures as well as behavioral health procedures were more likely among class I, and other types of procedures were more likely among class II. Class II patients were more likely to have moderate-to-severe TBI, to be admitted on weekends, to urban, medium-to-large hospitals in Midwestern, Southern or Western regions, and less likely to be > 30 years, female or non-White. Class II patients were also less likely to be discharged home and necessitated longer hospital stays and greater hospitalization charges. Surgery appears to distinguish two classes of hospitalized patients with TBI with divergent healthcare needs, informing the planning of healthcare services in this target population.