Comparison of septoplasty with and without nasal packing and review of literature

Open label, interventional, single arm multicentric clinical study to analyze the potency of VELNEZ nasal pack, post-nasal surgery

Background

Nasal packs are central to nasal surgeries. Primarily, these packs function by controlling bleeding, modulating pain and reducing adhesions postsurgery. However, the major setback of the currently used conventional nasal packs is the unbearable pain the patient undergoes upon removal of these packs. To overcome this shortcoming a variety of biodegradable packs have emerged. This study was aimed at evaluating the safety, efficacy and tolerability of VELNEZ nasal packs. VELNEZ, a patented Datt Mediproducts Pvt. Ltd. nasal pack, is one of its kind biodegradable composite that fragments within a few days of application.

Methods

Eighty patients were included in an open label, interventional, single arm clinical study using clinical endpoints to investigate the safety and efficacy of nasal pack VELNEZ. The patients were questioned using a visual analog scale from discharge day to 28th postoperative day (9 follow-up visits) at regular intervals. The standardized questionnaires for hemorrhage control, relief from postoperative pain, moderate obstruction, and pain were used.

Results

A total of 76 patients were enrolled in the study and 74 patients completed the study. VELNEZ nasal pack played a significant role in controlling hemorrhage and reducing postoperative pain. The average hemorrhage control time was 7.49 ± 3.90 min with only 34.24% of population complaining of pain on the sixth day of surgery (follow-up 4). Forteen days postsurgery only 10.95% of subject population complained of postoperative pain. This biodegradable composite has an average fragmentation time of 4.7 days in the nasal cavity. In addition, this study did not observe any postoperative adverse events or serious adverse events.

Conclusion

VELNEZ, a fragmentable nasal pack, is comfortable, safe, and effective against postsurgery bleeding and pain.

Optimizing Postoperative Care in Rhinoplasty and Septoplasty: A Review of the Role of Nasal Packing and Alternatives in Complication Management

Rhinoplasty, a common surgical procedure for nose reshaping, demands meticulous preoperative evaluation and precise execution. When coupled with septoplasty to address medical issues stemming from a deviated nasal septum, these procedures can lead to noteworthy postoperative complications. These encompass early issues like epistaxis and hematoma, as well as long-term challenges such as scarring and aesthetic deformities. Strategies like steroids and tranexamic acid are employed to prevent and manage these complications. A contentious aspect in postoperative care is the use of nasal packing. While some argue it aids healing and hemostasis, others avoid it due to patient discomfort. This review assesses the pros and cons of postoperative nasal packing following rhinoplasty and septoplasty. A thorough literature review spanning 2000-2023 yielded 30 relevant articles from 62. Discussion reveals that nasal packing offers limited benefits in reducing bleeding, edema and ecchymosis. In conclusion, the decision to employ nasal packing in rhinoplasty and septoplasty should be made carefully, considering patient comfort and surgical context. Evidence suggests that nasal packing may not consistently provide significant advantages and could lead to adverse outcomes. Nasal splints offer similar advantages and may be considered viable alternatives. Surgeons should tailor their approach to individual patient needs, with further research needed to refine postoperative management for these procedures.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

An Analysis of the VELNEZ Nasal Pack's Acceptability and Safety for Use During Nasal Surgery: A Prospective Study

The primary function of nasal packs is to modulate the bleeding, prevent adhesions and obstruction, with least discomfort to the subjects without risking secondary infection. However, both packing and removal of the pack is an unpleasant experience, with the latter being extremely painful. Therefore the need of the hour is a dressing which prioritizes subject comfort without compromising other desired nasal pack properties. Twenty subjects were enrolled in this interventional, open label study. The subjects had 10 hospital visits, starting from baseline (Visit 1) to postoperative day 28 (Visit 10), at regular intervals. The proportion of the population with postoperative pain alleviation and bleeding control failure (within 10 min) were the main objectives. Within 10 min of VELNEZ administration, all 20 participants got their bleeding under control. With VELNEZ, the painful nasal pack removal method was totally avoided because it was biodegradable. No moderate/severe pain, infection and adhesions were reported in any of the subjects, but few subjects reported moderate obstruction until Visit 3 (Discharge Day). In the present study, for participants undergoing nasal surgery, VELNEZ proved to be a secure and reliable nasal pack. Trial Registration: CTRI/2021/09/036437, prospectively registered.

Impact of Intranasal Splint Removal Time on Postoperative Complications after Septoplasty

BACKGROUND

Various types of nasal tampons are used for packing after septoplasty. Intranasal splints are widely used as they are more advantageous than other materials regarding the lower complication rates of synechia, and lesser pain during removal. However, there is no consensus on the timing of intranasal splint removal after septoplasty operations.

AIM

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of removal time of intranasal splints on postoperative complications after septoplasty.

METHODS

One hundred patients who had septoplasty were randomly divided into two groups according to splint removal time. In group I, the splints were removed on the third postoperative day and in group II, splints were removed on the seventh postoperative day. Pain during splint removal was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Complications of hemorrhage, septal hematoma, crusting, mucosal injury, and infection were recorded during splint removal and compared. In the first postoperative month, hemorrhage, crusting, mucosal injury, infection, synechia, and in the second postoperative month, synechia and perforation rates were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Mucosal crusting was significantly higher in group II during splint removal. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the complication rates and pain scores. Our findings showed no significant difference in pain scores during splint removal and postoperative complications between the two groups except for mucosal crusting.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, although there is no consensus on the optimal time for splint removal, earlier removal of splints can be considered a favorable option after septoplasty operations.

Septoplasty and Nasal Packs From Otolaryngologists' Perspectives: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Introduction Septoplasty is a commonly performed surgery by otolaryngologists. This study examines the routine use of non-absorbable nasal packs in the postoperative period in Kuwait. Our aim is to assess the views of otolaryngologists in Kuwait regarding the routine use of non-absorbable nasal packing after septoplasty with or without turbinoplasty. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study, an anonymous survey, consisting of 10 questions, using Google Forms was conducted. It was distributed via WhatsApp and in person hard copies to otolaryngologists - head and neck surgeons in Kuwait. Data were securely stored and analyzed using Stata (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas) software. Results Fifty participants have completed the survey. The majority were routinely performing septoplasty for a symptomatic deviated nasal septum (n= 47, 94%). Out of those, 43% (n = 21) usually use silastic splints to prevent postoperative complications, including bleeding, hematoma formation, and adhesions. The use of quilting sutures for the same purpose was done by 21% (n = 10), and 17% (n = 8) used non-absorbable nasal packs. Only two participants believed that no specific intervention was required. More than half used postoperative nasal packs in the case of intra-operative bleeding (n=26, 52%), while 18% (n = 9) believed that it is only necessary in selected cases with predisposing factors to bleeding. Ninety-two percent (n = 46) thought that pain and discomfort were associated with the use of non-absorbable nasal packs, and 50% (n = 25) believed that it could cause hemodynamic instability. Moreover, 66% (n = 33) agreed that quilting or trans-septal sutures can safely substitute nasal packs following septoplasty. Awareness of recent updates on the complications related to nasal packing varied, with more than half of the otolaryngologists being knowledgeable (n = 29, 58%). Discussion Septoplasty, a common surgical intervention for correcting a misaligned nasal septum, addresses various symptoms, such as nasal obstruction, obstructive sleep apnea, epistaxis, and headache. While the practice of nasal packing for 24-48 hours post-septoplasty is widespread, it remains a topic of controversy. Current literature supports the continued use of nasal packing for patients at high risk of bleeding. However, potential drawbacks, including increased pain, headache, and prolonged hospital stay, raise concerns about its overall benefits. An alternative approach, utilizing quilting sutures without nasal packs, has shown promising results in comparative studies, demonstrating less pain and minimal bleeding. Additionally, trans-septal sutures emerge as a safe alternative, minimizing dead space and reducing post-operative complications. Conclusion It appears that otolaryngologists in Kuwait have diverse opinions with regard to nasal packing following septoplasty. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for this common procedure.

Comparison of the Ankaferd Blood Stopper Tampon and the Merocel Nasal Tampon after Septoplasty Surgery

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of the Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) on nasal bleeding, pain, eating disorders, and sleeping problems in patients undergoing septoplasty.

METHODS

The prospective study included 100 patients who underwent septoplasty surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on the chronological order of hospital admission: Group I was administered the ABS, and Group II was administered a standard Invotec Merocel nasal tampon. In both groups, the intensity of pain experienced by patients postoperatively during tampon use and tampon removal was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to VAS scores assessed during tampon use. In the ABS group, the VAS scores assessed during tampon use were significantly lower, and the incidence of nasal obstruction, eating disorders, dripping-type bleeding before tampon removal, and sleeping problems was significantly lower in the ABS group than in the Merocel group.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABS may be a viable alternative to other nasal packs, as it did not lead to a significant reduction in postoperative patient comfort during tampon use and caused a lower incidence of postoperative pain, eating disorders, sleeping problems, and nasal obstruction than standard Merocel tampons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Differences in Need for Opioids After Sinonasal Surgery at Day of Surgery and in the Postoperative Period

INTRODUCTION

In the last years, the use of opioid analgesics has increased, as well as their morbidity and mortality, especially in the United States. Most patients after sinonasal surgery receive opioid analgesics, although up to 90% have leftover opioid pills. Around 70% of these patients keep the opioid analgesics, which could possibly lead to improper use. The objective of the following study was the investigation of the need for, use of, timing and side effects of opioid and non-opioid analgesics after sinonasal surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of (n = 280) patients who underwent sinonasal surgery in the Otolaryngology Department of the University Erlangen-Nürnberg between January and December 2018. The postoperative pain (3-5 days after surgery) using the numeric rating scale and the postoperative need for on-demand opioids and non-opioid analgesics in relation to demographic and surgical parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of total, 59.64% of all patients received opioid analgesics postoperatively on the day of surgery. On the first postoperative day (POD1), the mean pain score yielded the highest values; however, only 0.71% of the patients needed opioid analgesics, and pain was sufficiently controlled with non-opioids or no pain medication at all. There was a significant reduction of the pain score from POD2 to 5 (P = .01; P < .01, respectively). Only 1.8% of the patients needed an opioid analgesic from POD1-5. Of total, 2.1% of the patients presented with a postoperative bleeding complication, and only 1 (0.4%) patient needed endoscopic coagulation.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the majority of patients need opioid analgesics almost exclusively on the day of surgery. There were no major complications in patients taking either opioid or non-opioids. Our results indicate that the postoperative pain regimen from POD1 should initially be started using non-opioid analgesics and be further escalated to opioid analgesics in individual cases.

Trans-septal Suturing Versus Merocel Nasal Packing: A Post Septoplasty Comparison

It has been observed that nasal packing following septoplasty contributes to co-morbidities like post-operative pain, bleeding and increased duration of hospital stay. Trans-septal suturing has been suggested as a safe and effective alternative with a view to obviate the need for nasal packing and the hence avoid the discomfort associated with it. To compare the outcome of trans-septal suturing technique with merocel nasal packing after septoplasty. This was a prospective comparative study done on 60 patients who underwent septoplasty. The patients were divided randomly into 2 groups, while Group A comprised of patients undergoing Post-operative nasal packing with poly vinyl alcohol sponge (also commercially called Merocel), Group B included patients who underwent nasal septal suturing after surgery. The postoperative pain, hemorrhage and duration of hospital stay were the main parameters that were assessed and a comparison was drawn between the post-operative outcome of two techniques. Post-operative global pain score was 62.18 ± 4.75 in the group A (patients with nasal packing) and 24.73 ± 4.29 (patients with trans-septal suturing) in group B ('p'value was < 0.0001). Post-operative bleeding was noticed in 19 patients (out of 30) in group A, and in 2 patients of group B ('p'value was < 0.0001). 27 out of 30 patients of Group A were discharged on day 2 whereas 24 out of 30 patients of Group B required only 1 day of hospital stay after the surgery ('p' value was < 0.0001). Trans-septal suturing technique reduces the duration of hospital stay, causes lesser post-operative bleeding and pain and is a relatively less painful technique than merocel nasal packing.

The Efficacy of Septal Quilting Sutures Versus Nasal Packing in Septoplasty

Nasal packing is the classic method adopted by many otolaryngologists to stabilize the nasal septum and decrease the occurrence of postoperative bleeding and septal hematoma after septoplasty. However, because of its associated postoperative morbidity, many surgeons started to adopt alternative methods. This study aimed to assess the outcome and benefits of septal quilting sutures in comparison to nasal packing after septoplasty. A prospective non-randomized comparative interventional study was carried out at two teaching hospitals in Mosul city from January 2020 to January 2021. A total of 60 patients who were candidates for septoplasty, were included in the study. According to the surgeon's preference; 30 patients had placement of septal quilting sutures (group A), and in the other 30 patients nasal packing was performed (group B). Patients were assessed for postoperative morbidity and early outcome in the first 24 h, 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. In the first 24 h after septoplasty, patients in group B had significantly higher levels of nasal/facial pain, headache, sleep disturbance, breathing difficulties and swallowing difficulties compared to group A (p < 0.001). Over the follow up period of 1 month, no significant differences were recorded regarding postoperative bleeding, hematoma, infection, adhesions formation and septal perforation between the two groups (p > 0.05). Septal quilting sutures technique is more favorable in the early period in terms of patient discomfort after septoplasty, better nasal block and nasal/facial pain, the absence of misery on pack removal, with minimal bleeding after surgery.

YouTube as an Information Resource for Persons Interested in Septoplasty and/or Turbinoplasty

Background and Objectives: YouTube is a widely used web site. In general, many people search for medical information on YouTube. We evaluated the septoplasty and turbinoplasty videos on YouTube from an expert’s point of view.Methods: We used “septoplasty,” “turbinoplasty,” and “septoplasty turbinoplasty” to search YouTube. Of the 150 videos, we eventually viewed 83. Two researchers assessed the sources, lengths, and numbers of likes, dislikes, and views. The videos were classified as “excellent,” “moderate,” or “poor” in terms of utility; we also evaluated the uploaded material and content.Results: Of the 83 videos, 18 (21.7%) were excellent, 27 (32.5%) were moderate, and 38 (45.8%) were poor. We found no significant differences in length and mean likes, dislikes, and views between the groups classified as useful. Fifteen (39.5%) of 38 poor videos were by patients, and 13 (34.2%) of 38 poor videos were by physicians. When organized by content type, videos on personal experiences were significantly longer than the others. Of 20 videos on personal experiences, 15 (75%) were poor and all 5 advertisement videos (100%) were poor.Conclusion: Information from YouTube on septoplasty and turbinoplasty is not yet adequate. However, since YouTube content cannot be controlled, it is necessary to upload objective and accurate videos for patients and experts in professional groups such as the medical society. Such videos should be promoted and used actively.

The Effect of Dexpanthenol-Vitamin A (Nazalnem) on Silastic Splints After Nasal Septal Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of dexpanthenol-vitamin A (Nazalnem) ointment applied to the surface of silastic splints with an airway immediately after nasal septal surgery on postoperative complaints and nasal mucosa function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 60 patients undergoing nasal septoplasty surgery. Group 1 (n = 30) received silastic splints with ointment containing dexpanthenol-vitamin A (Nazalnem), and Group 2 (n = 30), the control group, received silastic splints with vaseline. Of these patients, 2 patients from the Group 1 and 9 from the Group 2 were excluded.A thin layer of ointment was applied to the flat side of a silastic splint with an airway. The splints were removed on the second postoperative day. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively using a visual analog scale and the Sino-Nasal Outcome test (SNOT-22). Mucociliary clearance (MCC) tests were performed at the same times.

RESULTS

Visual analog scale for nasal crusting, nasal congestion, and foul odor was better in Group 1 than in Group 2 both at 1 week and at 2 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.05).The SNOT scores were significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 at 1 week (P < 0.01), but did not differ at 2 weeks postoperatively (P > 0.05).Postoperatively, the MCC were insignificant between the groups and within the groups at 1 and 2 weeks (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although Dexpanthenol-Vitamin A ointment had no direct effect on wound healing, it had significant effects on crusting, obstruction, and foul smell. However, silastic splints with dexpanthenol did not improve the MCC of the nose.

[The blockade of sphenopalatineganglionthrough the palatal approachin the present-day rhinological practice]

This article deals with the application of the sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in the present-day rhinological practice. The blockade is known to arrest the propagation of pain impulses from the nose and break the rhinocardiac reflex arc. Moreover, it is involved in bleeding control during nasal surgery. The method for the blockade via the palatal route using the modern equipment and imaging techniques is described. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the blockade of sphenopalatine ganglionthrough the palatal approach in the patients who had undergone septoplasty under general and local anesthesia. It included a total of 105 patients divided into two groups one of which was treated with the use ofblockade of sphenopalatineganglionin addition to conventional anesthesia while the patients of the other group were treated under traditional anesthesia alone. The results of the study confirm the effectiveness of blockade of sphenopalatineganglionthrough the palatal approach as a method for the treatment of postoperative syndrome, bleeding control during nasal surgery, and reduction of parasympathetic influence on the cardiac rhythm.