Safety and tolerance of sorafenib in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib-Induced Erythema Multiforme Major and Severe Hepatic Failure in Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Report

Sorafenib, a kinase inhibitor, is known to cause skin toxicity, which sometimes leads to treatment interruption or drug dose reduction. Erythema multiforme (EM) is one of these dermatologic toxicities induced by sorafenib. We report the case of a 28-year-old male with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Two months after surgery, the patient presented with multiple metastases to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes and lungs. Therefore, systemic therapy with sorafenib was indicated. While receiving the medication, the patient presented signs compatible with EM. The signs occurred on the torso and then spread to the rest of the body. Sorafenib treatment was interrupted the same day when skin lesions appeared and moisturizers with topical steroids and oral antihistamines were prescribed. The skin lesions decreased in size but without significant cutaneous improvement. The patient showed biologically severe liver failure and radiological progression. Because of the severe hepatic failure, initiation of intravenous steroids and establishment of another line of chemotherapy following tumor progression were contraindicated. The decision of the multidisciplinary staff with patient consent was to proceed with the best supportive care. The patient died in ambulatory care 12 days after discharge and local treatment. This report highlights the possibility of developing severe EM while receiving sorafenib. Patients with HCC who have liver resection without liver dysfunction should not be administered sorafenib, or it must be used with caution at very low doses and accompanied by close and regular follow-ups to avoid disease progression and deaths.

Predictive factors for long-term survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sorafenib, used for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has an overall survival (OS) of 10 months. However, some patients have better response and long-term survival (LTS). Aims to assess predictive factors for LTS.

METHODS

Retrospectively reviewed 77 advanced HCC patients, starting sorafenib treatment between 2007 and 2016, with LTS (OS ≥24 months) as primary endpoint. Univariate and multivariable analysis of clinical variables were performed in order to identify predictive factors for LTS.

RESULTS

Patients: seventy (90.9%) males; median age: 65 years (39-82). All had cirrhosis mostly HCV infection (n = 32, 41.6%). Majority were Child-Pugh class A (n = 50, 64.9%); median MELD-Na: 11 (6-30). Multinodular HCC: 74% (n = 57); portal vein invasion (PVI): 50.6% (n = 39); extrahepatic spread: 18.2% (n = 14). Median time between HCC diagnosis and sorafenib start: 3.3 months (0-37.6). Median OS: 13 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-17.8]. Twenty-five (32.5%) patients were considered LTS, with amedian OS: 52.3 months (95% CI 17.1-87.4). Multivariable analysis identified Child-Pugh class A [odds ratio (OR) 11.1, 95% CI 1.78-69.54] and absence of PVI (OR 7.88, 95% CI 1.56-39.8) as independent predictors of LTS. Sub-analysis of Child-Pugh class A: absence of PVI (OR 7.13, 95% CI 1.69-30.2) and alpha-fetoprotein <400 ng/ml (OR 5.82, 95% CI 1.18-28.75) independently related to LTS.

CONCLUSION

Despite global short median OS, sorafenib treatment is associated with longer than 2-year survival in a sub-group, more likely in compensated liver disease and absence of PVI.

The Progress in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of most prevalent cancer and is a serious healthcare issue worldwide. Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a frequent complication and remains as the blockage in the treatment of HCC with high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. There is still no global consensus or standard guideline on the management of HCC with PVTT. In western countries, Sorafenib and Lenvatinib are recommended as the first-line treatment options for HCC patients with PVTT where this condition is now regarded as BCLC Stage C regardless of PVTT types. However, there is growing evidence that supports the close relationship of the extent of PVTT to the prognosis of HCC. Besides the targeted therapy, more aggressive treatment modalities have been proposed and practiced in the clinic which may improve the prognosis of HCC patients with PVTT and prolong the patients’ survival time, such as transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, hepatic resection, liver transplantation, and various combination therapies. Herein, we aim to review and summarize the advances in the treatment of HCC with PVTT.

[Effect of ozone oil for prevention and treatment of sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reactions: a randomized controlled trial]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of medical ozone oil and urea ointment for prevention and treatment of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) caused by sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A total of 99 patients diagnosed with advanced HCC according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) who were scheduled to receive sorafenib treatment for the first time were enrolled in this study between April, 2018 and January, 2020. The patients were randomized into medical ozone oil group (n=49) and urea ointment group (control group, n=49) for treatment with local application of 1 mL medical ozone oil (experimental group) and 10% urea ointment (2 g) on the palm and plantar skin (including the fingers and joints) for 12 weeks (3 times per day) starting at the beginning of sorafenib treatment, respectively. The patients were observed for occurrence of HFSR every 2 weeks for 14 weeks.

RESULTS

Eight patients were excluded for poor compliance or protocol violations, leaving a total of 91 patients for analysis, including 44 in medical ozone oil group and 47 in urea ointment group. Sixteen (36.4%) of patients in ozone oil group developed HFSR, a rate significantly lower than that in urea ointment group (57.4%; P < 0.05). The incidence of grade 2/3 HFSR was also lower in ozone oil group than in urea ointment group (15.9% [7/44] vs 27.7 [13/47]).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical ozone oil can significantly reduce the incidence and severity of HFSR to improve the quality of life of HCC patients receiving sorafenib treatment.

Effect of urea cream on sorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reaction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter, randomised, double-blind controlled study

BACKGROUND

Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is the most common adverse event during sorafenib treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of urea cream in the prevention of HFSR or amelioration of HFSR severity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with HCC were treated with either placebo cream or urea cream for 12 weeks concomitantly with sorafenib treatment. HFSR development, the Hand-Foot Skin Reaction and Quality of Life (HF-QoL) questionnaire score, and adverse events were assessed at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 288 patients, 247 patients, with 117 patients in the placebo control group and 130 patients in the urea cream group, were analysed. The urea cream group showed a trend towards a lower cumulative incidence of any-grade HFSR (log-rank, P = 0.247) and severe HFSR of grade II or higher (log-rank, P = 0.394) without statistical significance. In the incidence by time point, the incidence of severe HFSR of grade II or higher was significantly lower in the urea cream group than in the placebo control group at 2 weeks (13.8% versus 23.9%, P = 0.042). The urea cream group showed a significantly better HF-QoL questionnaire score than the placebo control group (11.8 versus 19.7, P = 0.014) at 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with urea cream showed a lower incidence of severe sorafenib-induced HFSR at 2 weeks and reduced the tendency of HFSR development in HCC patients. Therefore, treatment with urea cream may be considered for prophylaxis or improvement of HFSR grade in HCC patients treated with sorafenib.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03212625).

Liver stiffness in magnetic resonance elastography is prognostic for sorafenib-treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether liver stiffness (LS) quantified using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) could predict the prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with sorafenib.

METHODS

We selected 50 sorafenib-treated advanced HCC patients who underwent MRE within 3 months before drug administration from a prospectively maintained cohort of chronic liver disease patients, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic role of laboratory data, tumor characteristics, and MRE-assessed LS for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and significant liver injury (grade ≥ 3) after sorafenib administration.

RESULTS

High MRE-assessed LS either as continuous (per kPa, hazard ratio (HR) 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.92, p < 0.001) or categorical (> 7.5 kPa, HR 4.06, 95% CI 1.40-11.79, p < 0.01) variable was significantly associated with poor OS along with higher serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP, ≥ 400 ng/mL) and advanced tumor stage (modified Union for International Cancer Control (mUICC) IVb). Higher MRE-assessed LS was also significantly associated with the development of significant liver injury after sorafenib administration (per kPa, HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.21-2.17, p = 0.001; > 7.5 kPa, HR 10.11, 95% CI 2.41-42.46, p = 0.002). PFS analysis identified higher serum AFP (≥ 400 ng/mL) and advanced tumor stage (mUICC IVb) as significant risk factors for early disease progression, whereas LS was not associated with PFS CONCLUSION: Higher MRE-assessed LS is a potential biomarker for predicting poor OS and significant liver injury in advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib.

KEY POINTS

• Higher pretreatment LS by MRE (> 7.5 kPa), higher AFP (≥ 400 ng/mL), and advanced tumor stage (mUICC IVb) were associated with poor OS in advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib. • Higher pretreatment LS by MRE was associated with developing significant (grade ≥ 3) liver injury during sorafenib treatment, which required termination of the therapy. • Patients with high pretreatment LS by MRE should be monitored carefully for potential liver injury during sorafenib treatment.

Fulminant Hepatitis in a Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Related to Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Treated with Sorafenib

We describe a case of acute liver failure in a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma related to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis during sorafenib treatment. A 74-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and hypertension was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with fatty liver. Three weeks after sorafenib therapy, at Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 3, he developed jaundice, general weakness, flapping tremor, nausea, and anorexia. Sorafenib was stopped: laboratory tests showed a relevant elevation of transaminases suggesting diagnosis of acute hepatitis. During hospital admission, the patient died of liver failure. Sorafenib is the first successful target therapy effective for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The most common adverse events are fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, skin rash/desquamation, diarrhea, and hypertension, whereas liver dysfunction is uncommon. To our knowledge, this is the first patient reported in the literature with hepatocellular carcinoma related to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who died of rapid worsening of liver function during sorafenib treatment.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after stopping sorafenib therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Targeted therapy is currently the standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but an effective treatment after the discontinuation of sorafenib therapy remains uncertain. We aim to investigate the survival benefits of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) after stopping sorafenib therapy. We retrospectively analyzed all patients with advanced HCC, who had received palliative TACE after terminating sorafenib therapy, from January 2008 to June 2016. Patients who were in the terminal stage (Child-Pugh class C or performance status 3-4), who received a liver transplantation, or who had received any HCC treatment other than TACE, were excluded. Finally, 28 patients were recruited as the TACE group, and were randomly matched 1:1 by age, gender, Child-Pugh class, extrahepatic metastasis, and portal vein thrombosis with 28 controls who only received supportive care. For avoiding any immortal time bias, the index date of outcome follow-up was also matched. Cumulative incidences of, and hazard ratios (HRs) for, patient mortality were analyzed. The baseline demographic data between the TACE group and the control group were similar, but the 1-year overall survival rate in the TACE group was significantly higher than that of the control group (41.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.4-63.0% vs. 24.5%, 95% CI: 6.3-42.7%; p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for alpha-fetoprotein > 400ng/mL, Child-Pugh class B, and tumor extension > 50% of liver volume, TACE was independently associated with a decreased mortality risk(HR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08-0.42). In addition, tumor extension > 50% of the liver was another independent prognostic factor associated with an increased mortality risk (HR 2.99, 95% CI: 1.31-6.82). Multivariate stratified analyses verified the association of TACE with a decreased mortality rate in each patient subgroup (all HR < 1.0). By controlling intrahepatic tumor growth, TACE may be a treatment option for use in improving patient survival in advanced HCC, after the termination of sorafenib therapy.

Sorafenib-induced acute-on-chronic liver failure in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation: A case report

Comprehensive treatments together with sorafenib provide a survival benefit for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is an increasingly recognized distinct entity; however, only few cases induced by sorafenib have been reported to date. We herein present a rare case of ACLF in a patient under treatment with sorafenib. A 63-year-old woman who suffered from hepatitis B for 10 years was admitted to our hospital. A computed tomography (CT) scan led to a diagnosis of HCC in the V/VIII hepatic segment, with invasion of the middle hepatic and the right portal veins. The patient received multidisciplinary treatment, including transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation and sorafenib. Two months after sorafenib treatment, the patient was readmitted due to progressive jaundice and ACLF was diagnosed by liver biopsy shortly thereafter. Although aggressive treatment was administered, the patient succumbed to the disease following rapid deterioration of her clinical condition. The majority of patients with HCC have underlying liver disease and combination therapy with sorafenib should be administered with caution, as it may increase the risk of severe hepatotoxicity. The present case suggests that patients treated with sorafenib may require a dose reduction following interventional treatment.

Phase I trial of radiation therapy and sorafenib in unresectable liver metastases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicities of sorafenib combined with stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) or whole liver radiotherapy (WLRT) in patients with liver metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eligible patients had unresectable liver metastases. Sorafenib dose was escalated in 2 strata: I - SBRT: effective liver volume irradiated (V_eff)<80% (30-60Gy in 6 fractions); II - WLRT: V_eff>80% (21.6Gy in 6 fractions). Four weeks of sorafenib, with radiotherapy during weeks 2-3, was delivered at 3 escalating dose levels (200-400mg twice daily). Dose limiting toxicity was defined as any grade 3+ liver toxicity, or grade 4+ treatment-related toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were treated: 18 in stratum I (median dose 42Gy), 15 in stratum II. The MTD was not reached. Grade 3+ toxicity was seen in 33% of patients, at a median of 10days. Two deaths from non-classic liver toxicity occurred post WLRT in stratum II. The median overall survival was 22.3 and 5.7months for strata I and II respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib and 21.6Gy in 6 fraction WLRT resulted in unacceptably high rates of liver toxicity. Although sorafenib combined with SBRT was tolerable, the observed efficacy does not merit further clinical evaluation.

Phase 2 study of lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib is an oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-3, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha, RET, and KIT. This phase 2, single-arm, open-label multicenter study evaluated lenvatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Patients with histologically/clinically confirmed advanced HCC who did not qualify for surgical resection or local therapies received lenvatinib at a dosage of 12 mg once daily (QD) in 28-day cycles. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to progression (TTP) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1; secondary efficacy endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between July 2010 and June 2011, 46 patients received lenvatinib at sites across Japan and Korea. The median TTP, as determined by independent radiological review, was 7.4 months [95 % confidence interval (CI): 5.5-9.4]. Seventeen patients (37 %) had partial response and 19 patients (41 %) had stable disease (ORR: 37 %; DCR: 78 %). Median OS was 18.7 months (95 % CI: 12.7-25.1). The most common any-grade adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (76 %), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (65 %), decreased appetite (61 %), and proteinuria (61 %). Dose reductions and discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 34 (74 %) and 10 patients (22 %), respectively. Median body weight was lower in patients with an early (<30 days) dose withdrawal or reduction than in those without.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib 12-mg QD showed clinical activity and acceptable toxicity profiles in patients with advanced HCC, but early dose modification was necessary in patients with lower body weight. Further development of lenvatinib in HCC should consider dose modification by body weight. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00946153.

Ginkgo biloba extract in combination with sorafenib is clinically safe and tolerable in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is the only therapy shown to improve overall survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the clinical efficacy of sorafenib is limited. Combination therapy targeting multiple signaling pathways may improve outcomes. Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) has exhibited antitumor activity in multiple human cancers.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the tolerability and effectiveness of GBE combined with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with advanced HCC were treated with increasing doses of GBE in combination with sorafenib.

METHODS

We first determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of GBE, then the patients were treated with GBE at the MTD to evaluate its safety and efficacy. 27 patients were enrolled in the first part of our study and treated with sorafenib 400mg twice daily (BID) and increasing doses (cohort 1: 60mg, cohort 2: 120mg, cohort 3: 240mg, cohort 4: 360mg) of GBE once daily (QD). An additional group of 32 new patients next to the 27 described before were accrued for the second part of our study, and all these 32 patients were eligible for the evaluation of toxicity and efficacy.

RESULTS

No patient in cohort 1 and 2 experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). One of the ten patients in cohort 3 experienced a DLT. DLT occurred in two of the three initial patients in cohort 4. Cohort 3 (GBE 240mg QD plus sorafenib 400mg BID) was considered to be the MTD. Three patients had a partial response, 21 had stable disease, and 8 had progressive disease. The median times to progression and overall survival were 2.5 and 11.6 months, respectively. Compared with previous study, the toxicities of the combination therapy were similar with those observed in sorafenib monotherapy, GBE in combination with sorafenib slightly improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of GBE (240mg QD) and standard dose sorafenib (400mg BID) is safe and tolerable among patients with advanced HCC. Early signs of antitumor activity may warrant further development of this combination.

Evaluation of dose-efficacy of sorafenib and effect of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a retrospective study

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib are the therapeutic standard for intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients respectively. High costs with adverse events (AE) of sorafenib might limit sorafenib dosage, further affecting therapeutic response. To attain greatest benefit, we evaluated the efficacy of different doses and effect of TACE during and after sorafenib discontinuation in patients representing Child-Pugh Classification Class A with venous or extra-hepatic invasion.

Methods

A total 156 patients met the criteria and were divided into Groups I (n = 52) accepting 800 mg/day; II (n = 58) accepting 800 mg/day and reduced to 400 mg/day owing to AE; and III (n = 46) accepting 400 mg/day. TACE was performed during and after sorafenib discontinuation and therapeutic response bimonthly to four-monthly was rated thereafter.

Results

Median duration of sorafenib treatment and patients’ survival were 4.00 ± 0.45 and 7.50 ± 1.44 months in all cases; 2.50 ± 0.90 and 5.00 ± 1.10 months in Group I; 5.50 ± 1.27 and 16.50 ± 1.86 months in Group II; 4.00 ± 0.94 and 6.50 ± 2.49 months in Group III. Group II presented the best response and survival benefit (p = 0.010 and p = 0.011 respectively). Child-Pugh Classification score 5 (Hazard Ratio = 0.492, p = 0.049), absent AE (3.423, p = 0.015), tumor numbers ≤ 3 (0.313, p = 0.009), sorafenib duration ≤ 1 cycle (3.694, p = 0.004), and absent TACE (3.197, p = 0.008) significantly correlated with patient survival. TACE benefit appeared in separate and total cases during (p = 0.002, p = 0.595, p = 0.074, p = 0.002 respectively) and after discontinuation of sorafenib administration (p = 0.001, p = 0.034, p = 0.647, p = 0.001 respectively).

Conclusions

Low-dosage sorafenib not only appeared tolerable and lowered economic pressure but also provided satisfactory results. TACE benefited patient’s survival during and after sorafenib discontinuation.

Interleukin-6-stimulated progranulin expression contributes to the malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by activating mTOR signaling

This study aimed to determine the expression of progranulin (PGRN) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells in response to interleukin 6 (IL-6), a non-cellular component of the tumor microenvironment, and the molecular mechanism of PGRN oncogenic activity in hepatocarcinogenesis. Levels of IL-6 and PGRN were increased and positively correlated in HCC tissues. IL-6 dose- and time-dependently increased PGRN level in HCC cells. IL-6-driven PGRN expression was at least in part mediated by Erk/C/EBPβ signaling, and reduced expression of PGRN impaired IL-6-stimulated proliferation, migration and invasion of HepG2 cells. PGRN activated mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, as evidenced by increased phosphorylation of p70S6K, 4E-BP1, and Akt-Ser473/FoxO1. Inhibition of mTOR signaling with rapamycin, an mTOR signaling inhibitor, disturbed PGRN- or IL-6-mediated proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells in vitro. Persistent activation of mTOR signaling by knockdown of TSC2 restored PGRN-knockdown-attenuated pro-proliferation effects of IL-6 in HepG2 cells. In addition, rapamycin treatment in vivo in mice slowed tumor growth stimulated by recombinant human PGRN. Our findings provide a better understanding of the biological activities of the IL-6/PGRN/mTOR cascade in the carcinogenesis of HCC, which may suggest a novel target in the treatment of HCC.

Early evaluation of response to sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma by duplex Doppler ultrasonography

AIM

Early evaluation of the response to sorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This prospective study investigated the early evaluation of the efficacy of sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC using duplex Doppler ultrasonography (DDU).

METHODS

Thirty-seven Child-Pugh class-A advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d. were enrolled. Changes in portal venous area (PVA) and portal venous flow velocity (PVV) revealed by DDU before and after 2 weeks of sorafenib treatment were evaluated. The relation between the congestion index (PVA/PVV), which reflects the pathophysiological hemodynamics of the portal venous system and the tumor response, according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), was also assessed.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival and overall survival of all the patients was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-3.2) and 12.8 months (95% CI, 8.7-17.0), respectively. Overall, three patients (8%) had a partial response (PR), 15 (41%) stable disease (SD) and 17 (46%) progressive disease, according to the mRECIST, and two patients (6%) could not be evaluated because of worsened conditions. The decrease in the congestion index was significantly larger in the disease control group (PR/SD) after the sorafenib treatment (P = 0.035); furthermore, the congestion index was the only significant independent predictor of disease control (P = 0.033; hazard ratio, 8.456; 95% CI, 1.182-60.484).

CONCLUSION

A decrease in the congestion index revealed by DDU provides an early evaluation of response in patients taking sorafenib for advanced HCC.

Biological features and biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma

Similar to other cancers, a multistep process of carcinogenesis is observed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although the mechanisms underlying the development of HCC have been investigated in terms of oncology, virology, and stem cell biology, the whole picture of hepatocarcinogenesis remains to be elucidated. Recent progress in molecular biology has provided clues to the underlying cause of various diseases. In particular, sequencing technologies, such as whole genome and exome sequencing analyses, have made an impact on genomic research on a variety of cancers including HCC. Comprehensive genomic analyses have detected numerous abnormal genetic alterations, such as mutations and copy number alterations. Based on these findings, signaling pathways and cancer-related genes involved in hepatocarcinogenesis could be analyzed in detail. Simultaneously, a number of novel biomarkers, both from tissue and blood samples, have been recently reported. These biomarkers have been successfully applied to early diagnosis and prognostic prediction of patients with HCC. In this review, we focus on the recent developments in molecular cancer research on HCC and explain the biological features and novel biomarkers.

Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres for MRI-monitored delivery of sorafenib in a rabbit VX2 model

Transcatheter arterial embolization and chemoembolization are standard locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, these can result in tumor hypoxia, thus promoting tumor angiogenesis. The anti-angiogenic agent sorafenib is hypothesized to improve outcomes; however, oral administration limits patient tolerance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to fabricate poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres for local sorafenib delivery to tumors during liver-directed embolotherapies. Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONP) were co-encapsulated for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of microsphere delivery. Microspheres were fabricated using a double emulsion/solvent evaporation method and characterized for size, sorafenib and IONP content, and MRI properties. MRI was performed before and after intra-arterial microsphere infusions in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor model. The microspheres were 13 microns in diameter with 8.8% and 0.89% (w/w) sorafenib and IONP, respectively. 21% and 28% of the loaded sorafenib and IONP, respectively, released within 72 h. Rabbit VX2 studies demonstrated that sorafenib microspheres normalized VEGFR 2 activity and decreased microvessel density. Quantitative MRI enabled in vivo visualization of intra-hepatic microsphere distributions. These methods should avoid systemic toxicities, with MRI permitting follow-up confirmation of microsphere delivery to the targeted liver tumors.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Prophylactic Effect of Urea-Based Cream on Sorafenib-Associated Hand-Foot Skin Reactions in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To assess whether urea-based cream (UBC) has prophylactic benefits on sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and Methods

In this randomized, open-label trial, 871 patients with advanced HCC throughout China were treated with 10% UBC three times per day plus best supportive care (BSC; n = 439) or BSC alone excluding all creams (n = 432), starting on day 1 of sorafenib treatment, for up to 12 weeks. HFSR was assessed every 2 weeks and at 14 weeks for patients completing the study. Once HFSR occurred, patients were allowed any cream, including a UBC.

Results

The 12-week incidence of any grade HFSR was significantly lower in the UBC group versus the BSC-alone group (56.0% v 73.6%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.457; 95% CI, 0.344 to 0.608; P < .001), as was the incidence of grade ≥ 2 HFSR (20.7% v 29.2%, respectively; OR, 0.635; 95% CI, 0.466 to 0.866; P = .004). Median time to first occurrence of HFSR was significantly longer in the UBC group than the BSC-alone group (84 v 34 days, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.658; 95% CI, 0.541 to 0.799; P < .001). Elevated AST was associated with increased risk of HFSR but did not alter the treatment effect of UBC. UBC plus BSC, compared with BSC alone, did not affect the sorafenib dose reduction or interruption rate (9.1% v 11.8%, respectively; P = .1937), response rate (11.1% v 10.1%, respectively; P = .6674), or disease control rate (98.8% v 98.2%, respectively; P = .5350) at week 12.

Conclusion

UBC prophylaxis in patients with advanced HCC starting sorafenib reduced HFSR rates, extended the time to first occurrence of HFSR, and improved patient quality of life compared with BSC. Blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to determine the role of UBC on the incidence and severity of HFSR are warranted.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin and sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients unresponsive to transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity score-based weighting

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) using cisplatin as an alternative to sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who had not responded to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

Medical records of 127 consecutive HCC patients without extrahepatic metastasis (cisplatin, n = 44; sorafenib, n = 83) who had not responded to prior TACE at four institutions were retrospectively reviewed. An inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scoring was used to adjust for the selection bias.

RESULTS

Severe adverse events accounting for treatment discontinuation occurred in 2.3% of the patients in the cisplatin group and 32.5% of those in the sorafenib group. The median overall survival (OS) period was 11.2 months (95% CI 4.8-17.7) in the cisplatin group and 10.2 months (95% CI 8.8-11.5) in the sorafenib group, respectively. After an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the survival outcome of the HAIC treatment group was not inferior to that of the sorafenib treatment group (hazard ratio 0.758; 95% CI 0.471-1.219, P = 0.253).

CONCLUSION

HAIC with cisplatin can be an alternative treatment for the selection of HCC patients who have not responded to prior TACE and cannot tolerate sorafenib.

Field practice study of half-dose sorafenib treatment on safety and efficacy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score analysis

AIM

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who receive an initial full dose of sorafenib (800 mg/day) often require a decreased dose (400 mg/day) or discontinuation of therapy because of severe adverse events. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with HCC to compare the safety and efficacy of full- to half-dose sorafenib.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 218 consecutive patients with intermediate or advanced stage HCC who received half (n = 73) or full-dose sorafenib (n = 145) between 2009 and 2012 at four institutions. A propensity score-matching analysis was used to adjust for potential bias.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that increased age was an independent factor for the selection of initial half-dose sorafenib (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.15; P < 0.001). Fifty-eight patients each in the half-dose and full-dose groups were selected for propensity score matching. The incidence of grade 3-4 severe adverse effects was lower in the half-dose group (47.4% vs 66.7%, P = 0.037). In contrast, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were not significantly different (half-dose group, 3.8 and 10.2 months; full-dose group, 2.5 and 8.8 months; P = 0.143 and 0.911, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Propensity score-matched analyses indicate that initial half-dose sorafenib treatment led to fewer severe adverse effects and a comparable survival benefit compared with a full dose in select patients with HCC, particularly for those of advanced age.

Comparison of standard-dose and half‑dose sorafenib therapy on clinical outcome in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in field practice: A propensity score matching analysis

The aims of the present study were to examine whether unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with initial dose of sorafenib of 400 mg/day (half-dose group) had comparable treatment efficacy, safety and survival merit as compared with those treated with initial dose of sorafenib of 800 mg/day (standard-dose group) in a multicenter large study. For reducing the bias in patient selection, we compared clinical outcomes of these two groups using propensity score matching analysis. A total of 465 patients were treated with sorafenib at fourteen hospitals in Japanese Red Cross Liver Study Group from 2008 to 2013. After propensity score matching, 139 matched HCC patients were selected for analysis in both groups. We retrospectively compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), best treatment response and sorafenib related serious adverse events (SAEs) in the two groups. There were no relevant differences in terms of OS (median OS intervals: 9.2 months in the standard-dose group and 9.7 months in the half‑dose group, P=0.350), PFS (median PFS intervals: 3.4 months in the standard-dose group and 3.2 months in the half-dose group, P=0.729) and best treatment efficacy (objective response rate: P=0.416; disease control rate: P=0.719). Grade 3 or more SAEs were observed in 37 patients (26.6%) in the standard-dose group and 33 patients (23.7%) in the half-dose group (P=0.580). Furthermore, in all subgroup analyses according to Child-Pugh classification and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, there were no significant differences in the two groups. In conclusion, unresectable HCC patients treated with initial half‑dose sorafenib had comparable prognosis compared with those treated with initial standard-dose sorafenib.

Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives

The approval of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor targeting primarily Raf kinase and the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, in 2007 for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has generated considerable enthusiasm in drug development for this difficult-to-treat disease. However, because several randomized Phase III studies testing new multikinase inhibitors failed, sorafenib remains the standard of first-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced HCC. Field practice studies worldwide have suggested that in daily practice, physicians are adopting either a preemptive dose modification or a ramp-up strategy to improve the compliance of their patients. In addition, accumulating data have suggested that patients with Child-Pugh class B liver function can tolerate sorafenib as well as patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function, although the actual benefit of sorafenib in patients with Child-Pugh class B liver function has yet to be confirmed. Whether sorafenib can be used as an adjunctive therapy to improve the outcomes of intermediate-stage HCC patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization or early-stage HCC patients after curative therapies is being investigated in several ongoing randomized Phase III studies. An increasing number of studies have reported that sorafenib exerts "off-target" effects, including the modulation of signaling pathways other than Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, nonapoptotic cell death mechanisms, and even immune modulation. Finally, although sorafenib in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted therapies has the potential to improve therapeutic efficacy in treating HCC, it also increases toxicity. Additional clinical studies are warranted to determine useful sorafenib-based combinations for the treatment of advanced HCC.

A phase I/II study of S-1 with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is the sole molecular-targeted agent showing a survival benefit in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the tolerability and effectiveness of a combination of S-1 with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

S-1 was administered during days 1-14 and sorafenib was administered every day. This treatment was repeated every 21 days. In phase I, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The dose of each drug was planned as follows: cohort 1: S-1 48 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 400 mg/day, cohort 2a: S-1 48 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day, cohort 2b: S-1 64 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 400 mg/day, cohort 3: S-1 64 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day, and cohort 4: S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day and sorafenib 800 mg/day. In phase II, the patients were treated at the MTD to evaluate safety and efficacy.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled in phase I. One of the six patients in cohort 1 and one of the six patients in cohort 3 experienced DLT. None of the three patients in cohort 2a experienced DLT and three of the four patients in cohort 4 experienced DLT. Therefore, cohort 3 was considered the MTD. Subsequently, 26 patients were enrolled in phase II. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were an increase of aspartate aminotransferase (38.5 %), thrombocytopenia (23.1 %), neutropenia (19.2 %), hyperbilirubinemia (15.4 %), an increase of alanine aminotransferase (15.4 %), hyponatremia (11.5 %), rash (11.5 %), and hypophosphatemia (11.5 %). Sudden death occurred in one patient (3.8 %). A patient (3.8 %) had a partial response, 15 (57.7 %) had stable disease, and 10 (38.5 %) had progressive disease. The median times to progression and overall survival were 2.4 and 10.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of S-1 and sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC was 64 mg/m(2)/day and 800 mg/day, respectively. This dose/regimen demonstrated substantial clinical activity among patients with advanced HCC.

Is intra-patient sorafenib dose re-escalation safe and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Although sorafenib improves survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), doses have to be reduced in quite a few patients because of adverse events. We investigated whether intra-patient sorafenib dose re-escalations were safe and tolerable in patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

Of the 73 advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib, 42 achieved a tolerable dose with a dose reduction. We evaluated safety and tolerability in patients who attempted intra-patient dose re-escalations from the reduced dose.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 42 patients increased the sorafenib dose from the reduced dose. Ten patients had a tolerable dose of 400 mg on alternate days, and 3 patients had a tolerable dose of 400 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as toxicity resulting in a dose reduction, was observed in 8 of 13 patients as a hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), and DLT was noted in 2 of 13 patients as an increase in alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels. Seven of 13 patients did not exhibit DLT after dose re-escalations. Although 6 patients exhibited DLT, the cause of the adverse event was HFSR in all cases. The median escalation dose ratio, which was calculated as the ratio of the real cumulative dose to the cumulative dose when continued at the tolerable dose after dose re-escalation, was 1.84.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study indicated that intra-patient sorafenib dose re-escalations were safe and tolerable. Further prospective analyses are needed to determine in more detail the safety and efficacy of intra-patient sorafenib dose re-escalations.

Everolimus-induced human keratinocytes toxicity is mediated by STAT3 inhibition

Background

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are associated with dermatological adverse events. The chief aim of this study was to examine the relation between the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) protein and the dermatological adverse events associated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus.

Methods

We evaluated the effects of STAT3 activity and related signal transduction activities on everolimus-induced cell growth inhibition in the human keratinocyte HaCaT cell line via a WST-8 assay, and on signal transduction mechanisms involved in everolimus treatments via a western blot analysis. Apoptosis was evaluated using an imaging cytometric assay.

Results

The cell growth inhibitory effects of everolimus were enhanced by stattic or STA-21, which are selective inhibitors of STAT3, treatment in HaCaT cells, although such effects were not observed in Caki-1 and HepG2 cells. Phosphorylation at tyrosine 705 of STAT3 was decreased by treatment with everolimus in a dose-dependent manner in HaCaT cells; in contrast, phosphorylation at serine 727 was not decreased by everolimus, but slightly increased. Furthermore, we found that pretreatment of p38 MAPK inhibitor and transfection with constitutively active form of STAT3 in HaCaT cells resisted the cytostatic activity of everolimus.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that STAT3 activity may be a biomarker of everolimus-induced dermatological toxicity.

Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib: early detection of treatment response and major adverse events by contrast-enhanced US

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Early prediction of tumour response and major adverse events (AEs), especially liver failure, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is essential for maximizing the clinical benefits of sorafenib. To evaluate the usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for the early prediction of tumour response and major AEs in HCC patients.

METHODS

Thirty-seven HCC patients were started on a reduced dosage of sorafenib, subsequently increased to the standard dosage. Tumour response at 1 month was assessed by CT using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Major AEs were defined as grade 3 or higher. DCE-US was performed before treatment (day 0) and on days 7, 14 and 28. Changes in perfusion parameters in the tumour and liver parenchyma between day 0 and later time points were compared between treatment responders and nonresponders based on RECIST and between patients who experienced major AEs and those who did not. Tumour results were also compared with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Tumour perfusion parameters based on the area under the time-intensity curve (AUC) were statistically significant, with AUC during washin on day 14, the most relevant for tumour response (P = 0.0016) and AUC during washin on day 7, the most relevant for both PFS (P = 0.009) and OS (P = 0.037). A decrease in total AUC between days 0 and 7 in the liver parenchyma was strongly correlated with major AEs (P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

DCE-US may be useful for the early prediction of tumour response and major AEs in patients with HCC.

Giant cavernous hepatic hemangioma shrunk by use of sorafenib

Here we report a case of a 76-year-old man with a giant cavernous hepatic hemangioma of more than 20 cm in diameter. Since the hepatic hemangioma was actually growing and might possibly rupture and he complained of abdominal symptoms, we decided to perform interventional therapy. First we performed transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of the hepatic arteries. However, since this was not sufficiently effective, we added sorafenib (600 mg/day). As a result, the tumor shrank with symptomatic improvement. Subsequently, an adverse event occurred, and we suspended the sorafenib therapy. Then, the tumor began to grow, and we resumed administering sorafenib at 400 mg/day. The tumor shrank again, and we continued the sorafenib therapy thereafter. The tumor shrinkage, although possibly induced by the effect of TAE, is considered primarily due to the effect of treatment with sorafenib, because (1) TAE did not sufficiently reduce the blood supply to the inside of the tumor; (2) other tumors shrank in the area not targeted by TAE; and (3) the tumor grew during suspension of sorafenib therapy and shrank again after resuming the treatment.

Sorafenib: complexities of Raf-dependent and Raf-independent signaling are now unveiled

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary cancer worldwide. The only current drug available for clinical treatment of HCC is sorafenib, which inhibits multiple signaling kinases including Raf family members, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2, c-Kit, and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3. Many studies have revealed that the mechanism underlying the antitumor effect of sorafenib is complex. Because sorafenib inhibits C-Raf more potently than B-Raf, the therapeutic efficacy of sorafenib is strongly influenced by the relative expression and activity of B-Raf and C-Raf and the complex interactions between these factors. Moreover, Rafindependent signaling mechanisms have recently emerged as important pathways of sorafenib-induced cell death. Basic research studies have suggested that using sorafenib as part of a combination therapy may improve its effect, although this has yet to be confirmed by clinical evidence. Further studies of the functional mechanism of sorafenib are required to advance the development of targeted therapy for HCC. To aid future work on sorafenib, we here review the current literature pertaining to sorafenib signaling and its clinical efficacy in both monotherapy and combination therapy.

Field-practice study of sorafenib therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective multicenter study in Italy

A multicenter randomized controlled trial established sorafenib as a standard of care for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because the study was prematurely interrupted due to survival benefits in the sorafenib arm, we conducted an observational study to adequately assess risks and benefits of this regimen in field practice. Starting in 2008, all clinically compensated patients with advanced HCC and those with an intermediate HCC who were unfit or failed to respond to ablative therapies were consecutively evaluated in six liver centers in Italy, for tolerability as well as radiologic and survival response to 800-mg/d sorafenib therapy. Treatment was down-dosed or interrupted according to drug label. Two hundred ninety-six patients (88% Child-Pugh A, 75% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer [BCLC]-C, and 25% BCLC-B) received sorafenib for 3.8 months (95% CI 3.3-4.4). Two hundred sixty-nine (91%) patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE), whereas 161 (54%) had to reduce dosing. Treatment was interrupted in 103 (44%) for disease progression, in 95 (40%) for an AE, and in 38 (16%) for liver deterioration. The median survival was 10.5 months in the overall cohort, 8.4 months in BCLC-C versus 20.6 months in BCLC-B patients (P < 0.0001), and 21.6 months in the 77 patients treated for >70% of the time with a half dose versus 9.6 months in the 219 patients treated for >70% of the time with a full dose. At month 2 of treatment, the overall radiologic response was 8%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, macrovascular invasion, extrahepatic spread of the tumor, radiologic response at month 2, and sorafenib dosing were independent predictors of shortened survival.

CONCLUSION

Overall, safety, effectiveness, and generalizability of sorafenib therapy in HCC was validated in field practice. The effectiveness of half-dosed sorafenib may have implications for tailored therapy.