Physical and mental health status and health behaviors of survivors of multiple cancers: a national, population-based study

Urban green and blue spaces and general and mental health among older adults in Washington state: Analysis of BRFSS data between 2011-2019

A growing body of evidence highlights the significant effect of built environment features on mental and general health. This study examined the association between distance to and percentage of green and blue space measures and serious psychological distress, general health, and frequent mental distress among older adults living in urban ZIP codes in Washington state. Percentage of green space, particularly tree canopy and forest space, was significantly associated with better self-rated general health and reduced odds of serious psychological distress. Closer distance to blue space was associated with better self-rated general health. Programs which incentivize exposure to green and blue spaces for urban-dwelling, older adults may improve health outcomes.

Influence of social and behavioral determinants on health-related quality of life among cancer survivors in the USA

PURPOSE

Cancer survivors experience a worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than non-cancer survivors. However, it is not fully understood whether social determinants of health (SDOH) and health behaviors are significantly associated with HRQoL among cancer survivors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of SDOH and health behaviors on HRQoL among cancer survivors.

METHODS

We identified adult (18 years or older) cancer survivors (n = 5784) in the 2017 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The primary outcome (HRQoL) was defined as whether cancer survivors reported having poor mental or physical health (e.g., 14 or more mentally or physically unhealthy days). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression was used to compute the odds ratios and 95% CIs of factors associated with poor HRQoL among the cancer survivors.

RESULTS

More than half of the cancer survivors were non-Hispanic White, female, and 65 years or older. In the adjusted multivariable logistic regression models, cancer survivors who were physically active and who did not avoid care because of costs had a lower risk of poor mental and physical health. Current smokers were more likely to report poor physical health. Homeowners were less likely to report poor mental health. Daily fruit and vegetable consumption and healthcare coverage were not associated with poor HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Some SDOH (healthcare access, economic stability, and the neighborhood and built environment) and health behavior (physical activity) are associated with lower likelihood of experiencing poor mental and/or physical health in the cancer survivors. The study findings can be used to target survivors who experience suboptimal HRQoL and to inform research, public health policies, and/or programs.

Increased Risk of Suicide among Cancer Survivors Who Developed a Second Malignant Neoplasm

Background. Cancer diagnosis entails substantial psychological distress and is associated with dramatically increased risks of suicidal behaviors. However, little is known about the suicide risk among cancer survivors who developed a second malignant neoplasm (SMN). Methods. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a population-based cohort study involving 7,824,709 patients with first malignant neoplasm (FMN). We measured the hazard ratios (HRs) of suicide death after receiving a SMN diagnosis using Cox proportional hazard models, as compared with patients with FMN. The comparison with the US population was achieved by calculating standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Results. Totally 685,727 FMN patients received a diagnosis of SMN during follow-up, and we in total identified 10,930 and 937 suicide deaths among FMN and SMN patients, respectively. The HR of suicide deaths was 1.23 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14–1.31) after a SMN diagnosis, compared with FMN patients, after adjusting for sociodemographic factors, tumor characteristics, and cancer treatment. As compared with the general population, while both SMN and FMN patients suffered an increased risk of suicide deaths, the excess risk was higher among SMN patients than FMN patients (age-, sex-, and calendar-year-adjusted SMR 1.65 (95% CI 1.54–1.75) vs. 1.29 (95% CI 1.26–1.31); $P_{\text{difference}}<0.0001$ ). Notably, across different time periods, we observed the greatest risk elevation during the first 3 months after a cancer diagnosis. Conclusions. Compared with either patients with FMN or the general population, cancer survivors who received a SMN diagnosis were at increased risk of suicide death. The risk elevation was most prominent soon after the cancer diagnosis, highlighting the necessity of providing timely psychological support to cancer survivors with a SMN.

Health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors: Evaluating the rural disadvantage

PURPOSE

Head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors often experience distress and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impairment. Research suggests that rural cancer patients may have poorer outcomes than urban patients. This study examined whether HNC patient emotional and HRQOL outcomes differ in those living in a rural versus urban location at 6 and 12 months postdiagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 261 HNC patients were included from a longitudinal study of HNC outcomes. The majority were diagnosed with advanced stage cancer (51.3%); the most common cancer site was oral cavity (41.0%). Rurality was measured using the US Department of Agriculture Rural Urban Commuting Area codes. Depression was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), general HRQOL using the Short Form-36 (SF-36), and HNC-specific HRQOL using the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory (HNCI). Analyses were 2 (group) × 3 (assessment) repeated measures ANCOVAs, controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics.

FINDINGS

Approximately 45% of the sample lived in a rural location. Follow-up comparisons of significant overall models indicated that rural patients reported significantly more nonsomatic depression symptoms at 6-month follow-up. Rural patients were also more likely to report significantly poorer general mental HRQOL at 12-month follow-up, significantly poorer HNC-specific HRQOL related to eating at 6- and 12-month follow-up, and marginally worse aesthetics at 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are consistent with suggestions that rural HNC patients may be at heightened risk for depression symptoms and decrements in HRQOL. Patients should be screened and regularly monitored for issues with depression and HNC-specific HRQOL throughout the survivorship period.

Large-scale North American cancer survivorship surveys: 2011-2019 update

PURPOSE

There are gaps in our knowledge to provide quality cancer care to the growing numbers of survivors. Leveraging existing data to answer survivorship research questions is one approach to address these gaps. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to replicate and expand a previous report of existing cancer survivorship survey data.

METHODS

We conducted a trifold search strategy for relevant surveys and data sets to (1) determine the extent to which cancer survivors are being surveyed, (2) determine the topics being covered in these surveys, and (3) create a compendium of information about these surveys and data sets, so researchers can conduct additional analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty-five surveys were identified and included in this report; most were longitudinal studies (71%) in adult cancer survivors (91%). The domains addressed in these surveys were general medical characteristics, medical conditions, costs, employment, symptoms and/or side effects, psychosocial factors and coping, perceived quality of care, and health behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing data are available for researchers to explore new knowledge to enhance cancer survivorship quality care. This is an opportunity to fully utilize existing data to answer survivorship questions in a cost effective manner.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Survivors should be encouraged to participate in research studies as these data can close the gap in our knowledge and care of this growing population.

A Systematic Literature Review and Head-to-Head Comparison of Social Support and Social Constraint in Relation to the Psychological Functioning of Cancer Survivors

BACKGROUND

Quality of life is a multidimensional concept that includes perceptions of one's physical, psychological, social, and spiritual functioning, all of which are theorized to be interdependent. The focus of this study is social functioning, which itself is a multidimensional concept that includes social support and social constraint among other things. In cancer survivors, social support receives most of the research attention, but social constraint may have a stronger influence on quality of life.

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review evaluates which aspect of social functioning-social support or social constraint-has a stronger relationship with the psychological functioning of cancer survivors.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed in the identification and review of 32 independent records. Multiple measures of social support and social constraint were used across studies, with most having adequate psychometric properties. Psychological outcomes were divided into (a) general distress, (b) cancer-specific distress, (c) general well-being, and (d) cancer-specific well-being.

RESULTS

For general and cancer-specific distress, social constraint exhibited a larger association with distress than social support. Similarly, for general well-being, most studies reported a stronger association with social constraint than social support. For cancer-specific well-being, the opposite was true such that associations were stronger for social support than social constraint.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight the importance of considering social constraint when examining quality-of-life outcomes like psychological distress and well-being. Findings support social constraint as a target in interventions to reduce cancer survivors' distress, while social support could be considered in attempts to promote cancer-specific well-being.

Trends in the proportion of second or later primaries among all newly diagnosed malignant cancers

BACKGROUND

Improvements in cancer survival mean that an increasing number of survivors may live long enough beyond their initial cancer to be diagnosed with additional independent primary cancers. The proportion of newly diagnosed cancers that are second- or higher-order primaries and how this proportion has changed over the past several decades were examined.

METHODS

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were used to identify incident malignant primaries diagnosed between 1975 and 2017. Using the SEER sequence number, the authors tabulated the proportion of all cancers in each calendar year that were second- or higher-order primaries. The average annual percent change (AAPC) was then calculated to assess how this proportion has changed over time.

RESULTS

Analyses included nearly 4.9 million incident cancers diagnosed during 1975-2017. The proportion of all cancers that were second- or higher-order increased steadily from 9.77% during 1975-1984 to 21.03% during 2015-2017, reflecting an AAPC of 2.41% (95% CI, 2.16%-2.65%). In 2015-2017, second- or higher-order cancers were most prevalent among cancers of the bladder (28.79%), followed by lung and bronchus (28.07%), melanoma (27.88%), and leukemia (26.10%). The highest AAPCs over the study period were observed for melanoma (4.05%), leukemia (3.51%), and lung and bronchus (3.36%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of newly diagnosed cancers that are second- or higher-order has grown rapidly over the past several decades and currently exceeds 20%. Continued monitoring of second and later primaries will be critical for anticipating the future impact on cancer treatment and survivorship care.

Distress and mental health care and medication use among survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses: Findings from the 2016 National Health Interview Survey

OBJECTIVE

Over 1 million survivors of multiple primary cancer (MPC) diagnoses reside in the USA. Information regarding their physical and mental health status is limited. This study examined distress and mental health care use among MPC survivors relative to survivors of a single primary cancer (SPC) diagnosis.

METHODS

Using the 2016 National Health Information Survey, MPC survivors (n = 265), SPC survivors (n = 2103), and no cancer controls (NCC; n = 28,320) were identified. The MPC group was compared to the SPC and NCC groups with regard to multiple distress indices and use of mental health care and anxiety and depression medication.

RESULTS

Relative to the SPC group, the MPC group reported more Total Distress (M = 9.59 vs. 8.84; p < .001), and were more likely to report daily or weekly anxiety feelings (OR = 2.07; p < .001), meet criteria for serious psychological distress (OR = 1.49; p = .02) and have talked to a mental health professional (OR = 1.75; p = .01). Comparison of MPC and NweCC groups yielded similar results. The MPC group did not differ from the SPC or NCC groups in severity of anxiety or depression feelings, distress interference, or anxiety and depression medication use.

CONCLUSIONS

MPC survivors reported greater distress relative to SPC survivors. The clinical significance of this greater distress is unclear, however. While MPC survivors were more likely to have talked to a mental health professional, uptake of mental health care appeared to be suboptimal. MPC and SPC survivors might be considered distinct subgroups and increased attention devoted to potentially unique mental and physical health needs of MPC survivors.

Medical conditions and physical function deficits among multiple primary cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Survivors of multiple primary cancers make up a sizable proportion of all cancer survivors, yet little is known about the health of this population. We examined the prevalence of medical conditions and physical function deficits among multiple primary survivors compared with single primary survivors and individuals without a cancer history.

METHODS

Participants were enrolled in the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS)-II Nutrition Cohort in 1992/1993. Prevalent medical conditions (diabetes, heart conditions, cerebrovascular conditions, emphysema/chronic bronchitis, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis), physical function limitations, use of a cane or walker, balance difficulties, and falls within the past year were assessed on a follow-up survey completed in 2011. We estimated age- and sex-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs), comparing multiple primary survivors (N = 1003) to single primary survivors (N = 12,849) and participants without cancer (N = 63,578).

RESULTS

The prevalence of medical conditions did not differ substantially between multiple primary survivors and either comparison group. However, multiple primary survivors were more likely to report severe limitations in physical function than the single primary (PR = 1.48 (95% CI, 1.28-1.71)) and no-cancer (PR = 1.64 (95% CI, 1.42-1.88)) groups. Using a cane or walker and balance difficulties were also significantly more common among multiple primary survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a similar prevalence of comorbid medical conditions, severe functional limitations were significantly more common among multiple primary survivors than single primary survivors or individuals without cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Assessment of functional status and treatment of physical deficits may be an especially critical component of care for older patients with a history of multiple cancer diagnoses.

Psychobehavioral risk factors for financial hardship and poor functional outcomes in survivors of multiple primary cancers

OBJECTIVE

Survivors of multiple primary cancers (MPC) are at increased risk for poor health outcomes compared with survivors of single cancers. Using an adapted psychobehavioral stress-response model, the study purpose was to identify pathways and individual risk factors associated with poor health outcomes in adults with MPC.

METHODS

Adult MPC survivors (N = 211) with first cancers (stages I-III) diagnosed within 1 to 10 years were recruited via tumor registry. Employing a cross-sectional design, established questionnaires were used to operationalize patient characteristics and theoretical constructs including perceived stress, psychological and behavioral responses, financial hardship, social role function, and physical health. Disease and treatment data were obtained via registry and medical records. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to fit, test, and modify the hypothesized psychobehavioral model.

RESULTS

Following measurement model refinement, an SEM linking self-management behaviors, distress, financial hardship, and functional health demonstrated a good fit: χ² (200, N = 206) = 332.06, P < .01; Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = .95, comparative fit index (CFI) = .96, standardized root mean residual (SRMR) = .06, root-mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .06. Less use of self-management behaviors predicted higher distress which, in turn, predicted higher financial hardship; higher distress and financial hardship predicted poorer functional health. Several sociodemographic and personal factors predicted self-management behaviors and distress.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesized stress-response model was partially supported. Data supported pathways among self-management behaviors, distress, financial hardship, and functional health. Self-management and distress may represent modifiable intervention targets for MPC survivors. High body mass index (BMI), less education, greater neuroticism, and lower social support were associated with less use of self-management behaviors and higher distress and should be further evaluated as potential markers of vulnerability.

Evaluating the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework as a Participation Model for Cancer Survivors in Turkey

Improvements in diagnosis and treatment options for cancer now allow cancer survivors to live longer, and as a result, services are necessary to help individuals live an active and meaningful life in the community. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework as a participation model for cancer survivors in Turkey. Results from simultaneous regression analyses indicated educational attainment, fatigue, perceived stress, role functioning, social functioning, core self-evaluations, independent self-construal, social support, and autonomy support were significantly associated with participation. Specific interventions including health education, psychological workshops, support groups, and assistive technology may improve cancer survivors’ motivation and desire to actively engage in community activities. Higher levels of participation were also found when cancer survivors were involved in the treatment decision-making process, and felt cared for and understood by their treatment providers.

How do follow-up care instructions and treatment summaries relate to cancer survivors' cancer-related pain?

CONTEXT

Cancer-related pain is a problem for many cancer survivors. Treatment summaries (TS) and follow-up care instructions (FCI) provided after cancer treatment could reduce pain for cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine how TS and FCI received by cancer survivors relate to cancer survivors' cancer-related pain after treatment completion.

METHODS

Data were from 2010, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Cancer Survivorship module, completed by 10 U.S. states and entities.

RESULTS

Pain was reported by 9% of survivors. TS (P = 0.02) and FCI (P < 0.001) were associated with pain. Compared with cancer survivors who had not received TS or FCI, those who received TS had greater odds of pain (odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.28) and those who received FCI had more than twice the odds of pain (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-3.67).

CONCLUSION

FCI and TS were related to pain but in the opposite direction than predicted. Those who received TS and FCI were more likely to report pain than those who did not receive FCI and TS. This may be explained by the severity of cancer treatment. It is possible that those who undergo more severe cancer treatments are more likely to receive FCI and TS. Testing this relationship is a logical next step.

Lost productivity and burden of illness in cancer survivors with and without other chronic conditions

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors may experience long-term and late effects from treatment that adversely affect health and limit functioning. Few studies examine lost productivity and disease burden in cancer survivors compared with individuals who have other chronic conditions or by cancer type.

METHODS

We identified 4960 cancer survivors and 64,431 other individuals from the 2008-2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and compared multiple measures of disease burden, including health status and lost productivity, between conditions and by cancer site for cancer survivors. All analyses controlled for the effects of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and number of comorbid conditions.

RESULTS

Overall, in adjusted analyses in multiple models, cancer survivors with another chronic disease (heart disease or diabetes) experienced higher levels of burden compared with individuals with a history of cancer only, chronic disease only, and neither cancer, heart disease, nor diabetes across multiple measures (P < .05). Among cancer survivors, individuals with short survival cancers and multiple cancers consistently had the highest levels of burden across multiple measures (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors who have another chronic disease experience more limitations and higher levels of burden across multiple measures. Limitations are particularly severe in cancer survivors with short survival cancer and multiple cancers.

Cancer treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions: which cancer survivors receive them?

PURPOSE

Medically underserved subgroups of survivors bear a disproportionate burden of cancer-related health problems. Treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions are one possible strategy to address disparities in cancer-related health among cancer survivors. However, it is not known which cancer survivors receive these documents. This paper sought to identify and describe patterns in the receipt of treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions.

METHODS

Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System's 2010 cancer survivorship module were used for this study. This study involved 6,897 adult cancer survivors. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for associations between survivor's demographic and cancer-related factors and receipt of treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions.

RESULTS

Treatment summaries were received by 31 % of survivors. Demographic characteristics and type of health care provider were associated with treatment summaries (LR χ (2) (31) = 101.02, p < .001). Follow-up care instructions were received by 71 % percent of cancer survivors. Survivors' demographic and cancer-related characteristics were associated with follow-up care instructions (LR χ (2) (31) = 231.51, p < .001). Written follow-up instructions were received by 66 % of survivors who reported receipt of follow-up instructions. Receipt of written follow-up instructions was associated with gender and age.

CONCLUSION

Demographic and cancer-related patterns exist in the receipt of treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions. These patterns map to documented gaps in survivor cancer-related outcomes. Research that tests associations between treatment summaries and follow-up care instructions and cancer-related health outcomes is needed.

Mental and physical health-related quality of life among U.S. cancer survivors: population estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey

BACKGROUND

Despite extensive data on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among cancer survivors, we do not yet have an estimate of the percentage of survivors with poor mental and physical HRQOL compared with population norms. HRQOL population means for adult-onset cancer survivors of all ages and across the survivorship trajectory also have not been published.

METHODS

Survivors (N = 1,822) and adults with no cancer history (N = 24,804) were identified from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. The PROMIS® Global Health Scale was used to assess HRQOL. Poor HRQOL was defined as 1 SD or more below the PROMIS® population norm.

RESULTS

Poor physical and mental HRQOL were reported by 24.5% and 10.1% of survivors, respectively, compared with 10.2% and 5.9% of adults without cancer (both P < 0.0001). This represents a population of approximately 3.3 million and 1.4 million U.S. survivors with poor physical and mental HRQOL. Adjusted mean mental and physical HRQOL scores were similar for breast, prostate, and melanoma survivors compared with adults without cancer. Survivors of cervical, colorectal, hematologic, short-survival, and other cancers had worse physical HRQOL; cervical and short-survival cancer survivors reported worse mental HRQOL.

CONCLUSION

These data elucidate the burden of cancer diagnosis and treatment among U.S. survivors and can be used to monitor the impact of national efforts to improve survivorship care and outcomes.

IMPACT

We present novel data on the number of U.S. survivors with poor HRQOL. Interventions for high-risk groups that can be easily implemented are needed to improve survivor health at a population level.

Representation of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people in clinical cancer trials

PURPOSE

Clinical trials are important tools for advancing cancer treatment, prevention, and control. To identify and describe clinical effects relevant to underserved groups, their representation in clinical trials is necessary. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people have been identified as a medically underserved group and their representation in cancer clinical trials is unknown. This study sought to examine LGB cancer survivor representation in cancer clinical trials.

METHODS

Data were from the 2010, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Cancer Survivorship Module. Data were from five states that included both the Cancer Survivorship module and an item asking self-identified LGB status.

RESULTS

Participation in cancer clinical trials was higher among LGB cancer survivors (12.5%) than among heterosexual cancer survivors (6.0%) (p = .005). In the multivariate, adjusted model, LGB cancer survivors were more than twice as likely, as heterosexual cancer survivors, to report participation in a clinical trial (AOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.21-3.90).

CONCLUSION

LGB cancer survivors had greater likelihood of cancer clinical trial participation than heterosexual cancer survivors and this was not explained by demographics. The finding was unexpected given the historic marginalization of this group. The small number of LGB cancer survivors limits the generalizability and statistical power. Findings should be interpreted cautiously, and further research is needed to clarify explanatory mechanisms.

Physical and mental health status of survivors of multiple cancer diagnoses: findings from the National Health Interview Survey

BACKGROUND

Little research has identified the physical and mental health status of survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses.

METHODS

By using data from the population-based 2009 National Health Information Survey, 154 survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses, 1427 survivors of a single cancer diagnosis, and 25,004 individuals without a history of cancer diagnosis were identified. The multiple cancer group was compared with the single cancer and no cancer groups with regard to physical and mental health status using analysis of covariance and binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Relative to the no cancer group, the multiple cancer group reported significantly poorer mental health status, greater lifetime, recent, and current prevalence of a variety of medical conditions and comorbidities, and more health-related disability. Although observed group differences between the multiple cancer and single cancer groups were less pronounced than those between the multiple cancer and no cancer groups, a consistent pattern was also evident; the multiple cancer group reported significantly poorer status relative to the single cancer group across a range of mental and physical health and illness-related disability indices.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of 2 or more primary cancers (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) is associated with increased risk for poorer physical and mental health status over and above that associated with diagnosis of a single primary cancer. Survivors of multiple and single primary cancer diagnoses should be considered as distinct subgroups, and increased attention should be devoted to the unique status and needs of survivors of multiple primary cancer diagnoses.

El consumo de alcohol en los supervivientes al cáncer: estado de la cuestión y propuestas para el desarrollo de intervenciones psicológicas

Objetivo: El consumo de alcohol se ha establecido como un factor de riesgo para el desarrollo del cáncer de forma consistente a lo largo de los años. En los supervivientes al cáncer el consumo de alcohol después del tratamiento alcanza valores significativos y además el alcohol se ha asociado con aspectos relevantes de la supervivencia, como una mayor depresión y una peor calidad de vida. Sin embargo, no hay una gran variedad de intervenciones cuyo objetivo sea reducir el consumo de alcohol en este grupo de pacientes. Método: Se llevó a cabo una revisión sobre el consumo de alcohol en los pacientes y supervivientes al cáncer y las intervenciones psicológicas disponibles para reducir el consumo, en los últimos 10 años, del año 2007 al 2017. Las bases de datos consultadas fueron PubMed, Web of Science (WOS) y PsycInfo. Se utilizaron los siguientes descriptores: alcohol, cancer patients, survivors, psychological treatment. Resultados: no se observan intervenciones psicológicas diseñadas específicamente para reducir el consumo de alcohol en los supervivientes al cáncer en la literatura previa. La mayoría tienen como objetivo el aumento de las conductas de salud utilizando intervenciones de tipo psicosocial o proporcionando información sobre el alcohol. Solamente una intervención mostró resultados significativos para reducir el consumo de alcohol, en una intervención diseñada para reducir el peso en supervivientes al cáncer de mama. Conclusiones: la relevancia del consumo de alcohol en este grupo de pacientes sugiere la necesidad de que se desarrollen una mayor variedad de intervenciones psicológicas que tengan como objetivo específico la reducción del consumo de alcohol en los pacientes que han superado la enfermedad.