The Predictive Values of Five Sarcopenia Screening Tools on Clinical Outcomes Following Surgery in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-F+EBM as practical predictive tools for the risk of pneumonia in patients with stable schizophrenia-a prospective study

Objectives

Individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia have a high incidence and fatality rates due to pneumonia. Sarcopenia is a contributing factor to the development of pneumonia in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of three simple screening questionnaires, namely SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-F + EBM, in predicting the occurrence of pneumonia in stable patients with schizophrenia who are experiencing sarcopenia.

Design

A prospective study.

Setting

Patients with stable schizophrenia patients aged ≥50 years in two psychiatric hospitals in western China.

Methods

Medical data from patients were collected from September 1 to September 30, 2020. Data specifically from patients diagnosed with pneumonia were collected for a period of one year, from October 2020 to October 2021. Three hundred thirty-five stable schizophrenia patients, among whom 229 were males (68.36 %.), were enrolled in the prospective study. The risk of sarcopenia was evaluated using the SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and SARC-F + EBM scores, with values of ≥4, 11, and 12 indicating an elevated risk of sarcopenia. The collected data were analyzed using logistic regression analysis to establish the association between the scores of these screening tools and the risk of pneumonia in individuals with stable schizophrenia.

Results

The rate of pneumonia in stable schizophrenia individuals was 24.48 %. Among the included stable schizophrenia patients, the incidence of pneumonia in individuals with SARC-CalF scores ≥11 was higher than in those with SARC-CalF scores less than 11 (29.91 % vs 14.88 %, P = 0.002). In individuals with SARC-F + EBM scores ≥12, the pneumonia occurrence was higher than that in those with SARC-F + EBM scores less than 12 (37.33 % vs 20.77 %, P = 0.003). However, this pattern was not found in patients with stable schizophrenia who had SARC-F scores of 4 or above and less than 4. Following the implementation of logistic regression data analysis, it has been discovered that persons with SARC-CalF scores greater than or equal to 11 were at a significantly increased risk of having pneumonia compared to patients with SARC-CalF scores less than 11 (OR = 2.441, 95 % CI: 1.367-4.36). After adjusting the possible confounders, patients with SARC-CalF scores ≥11 had a greater danger of pneumonia (OR = 2.518, 95%CI: 1.36-4.665). As a result, it was found that individuals with SACR-F+EBM scores ≥12 were more likely to acquire pneumonia (OR = 2.273, 95%CI: 1.304-3.961) when compared to those with scores <12 (OR = 2.273, 95%CI: 1.304-3.961). The results of this study, which controlled for potential confounders, indicated that patients with SARC-F + EBM scores ≥12 were more inclined to acquire pneumonia (OR = 2.181, 95%CI: 1.182-4.026). However, in stable schizophrenia patients with SARC-F scores ≥4 and < 4, this study has not yet observed a similar pattern for pneumonia risk.

Conclusions and implications

These results demonstrate, in stable adults with schizophrenia, a relationship between pneumonia risk and SARC-F + EBM and SARC-CalF scores. It is, therefore, advised to use these scores to determine whether these patients have pneumonia, especially in hospitals that cannot diagnose sarcopenia.

Prognostic significance of Ishii's sarcopenia screening score for patients undergoing curative surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer after intraluminal decompression

PURPOSE

Sarcopenia influences the short- and long-term outcomes of various medical conditions including malignancy. Ishii's screening test estimates the probability of sarcopenia based on a score calculated by three simple variables: age, grip strength, and calf circumference. We investigated the clinical significance of Ishii's score for patients with non-metastatic obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC) who underwent curative surgery after intraluminal decompression.

METHODS

Ishii's score was calculated in 79 patients with OCRC. Muscle volume loss and decreased muscle quality were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) images as skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC), respectively.

RESULTS

There were 46 men and 33 women, with a median age of 70 years old. The cutoff value for Ishii's score was 155.1 and 15 patients were in the high-score group. The high-score group was significantly associated with worse time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS), and a high Ishii's score was an independent negative prognostic factor for TTR (hazard ratio = 2.93, P = 0.015). A high Ishii's score was significantly associated with a low SMI value but not with the IMAC value.

CONCLUSION

A high Ishii's score was independently associated with poorer TTR in patients with non-metastatic OCRC.

Exploring the role of body mass index-adjusted calf circumference within the SARC-CalF screening tool among older patients with cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess and compare the frequency of positive scores using unadjusted SARC-CalF with the scores derived from SARC-CalF after adjusting calf circumference (CC) for body mass index (BMI). The secondary aim was to assess the prognostic value of SARC-CalF after BMI adjustment, for length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, included both outpatients and inpatients of an oncology unit hospital in Brazil.

MEASUREMENTS

BMI and CC were measured. Patients with excess weight had their CC adjusted for BMI by subtracting 3 cm, 7 cm, and 12 cm from the unadjusted CC values for respective BMI categories. SARC-CalF was used to screen for sarcopenia. Scores ≥11 were indicative of sarcopenia, considering both unadjusted and BMI-adjusted CC values. Clinical outcomes included prolonged LOS and both short- and long-term mortality.

RESULTS

Our study included 206 subjects, with a median age of 69 years, and the majority were males (52.1%). The prevalence of low CC increased from 65% to 84% after BMI adjustment. Positive unadjusted SARC-CalF scores (≥11) were observed in 51% of the population and this prevalence increased to 65% using BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF criteria (≥11). Higher scores on BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF but not unadjusted SARC-CalF were independently associated with prolonged LOS [adjusted HR: 1.26 (1.03-1.53)], and 6-month mortality [adjusted HR: 1.42 (1.07-1.87)]. Both unadjusted and BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF were independently associated with 12-month mortality.

CONCLUSION

BMI-adjusted SARC-CalF may be a promising strategy to enhance the detection of older patients with cancer and excess weight at risk of sarcopenia, and it may serve a dual role as a prognostic tool, as it was independently associated with prolonged LOS and mortality.

Diagnostic Value of Serum Creatinine and Cystatin-C-Based Indices and Ishii Score in Cancer-Related Sarcopenia

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia is a key factor affecting the prognosis of cancer patients; however, identifying patients at risk remains challenging. The serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio (CCR) and the sarcopenia index (SI) are new biomarkers for sarcopenia screening. The Ishii test score is an equation based on age, grip strength, and calf circumference for sarcopenia screening. However, their performances in advanced cancer patients have not been thoroughly studied. We aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of three screening tools in diagnosing cancer-related sarcopenia.

METHODS

A total of 215 cancer patients with a median age of 60.5 y were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 (AWGS2019) criteria were used as a standard. The diagnostic accuracies of the CCR, SI, and Ishii screening test were analyzed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, the Youden index, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

According to the AWGS2019 criteria, the prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia was 47.9% and 18.6%, respectively. The CCR, SI (positively), and Ishii scores (negatively) were correlated with muscle mass. Accordingly, sarcopenia was negatively correlated with CCR and SI, while it was significantly positively correlated with the Ishii score. In males, the AUCs of the CCR, SI, and Ishii scores were 0.743 (95%CI 0.65-0.836), 0.758 (95%CI 0.665-0.852), and 0.833 (95%CI 0.751-0.909), respectively. In females, the AUCs of the CCR, SI, and Ishii scores were 0.714 (95%CI 0.61-0.818), 0.737 (95%CI 0.635-0.839), and 0.849 (95%CI 0.775-0.932), respectively. The AUC of the Ishii score was significantly higher than that of the other screening tools (p < 0.001). The cut-off value of the optimal Ishii score was 102.3 (sensitivity: 93.2%, specificity: 59.1%) for males and 98.3 (sensitivity: 93.3%, specificity: 64.7%) for females.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCR and SI based on serum CysC and creatinine had a remarkably similar overall diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenia in advanced cancer. Among the above three sarcopenia screening tools, the Ishii score chart seemed to have better predictive values of sarcopenia in cancer patients.

Preoperative low absolute and relative handgrip strength as predictors of postoperative short-term outcomes: a prospective study based on patients aged 60 years and older with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the association of absolute and relative HGS indicators with postoperative short-term outcomes in older patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

The prospective, single-center, observational study involved 230 patients (age ≥ 60 years) who underwent radical gastrectomy. Absolute HGS was directly obtained from results measured by a hand dynamometer, while relative HGS was calculated as the value of absolute HGS divided by body mass index (BMI), appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) and age, respectively. Low absolute HGS was defined according to the criterion in AWGS 2019 consensus and the first gender-specific quartile. Low relative handgrip strength was defined if it was below the first gender-specific quartile of the distribution. Postoperative outcomes included total complications, malnutrition and length of hospital stay. Univariate and multivariate regression models were performed to investigate and compare the predictive values of different HGS indicators.

RESULTS

For the five HGS indicators, multivariate analyses showed that low absolute HGS (AWGS consensus), low HGS/BMI and HGS/age were independent risk factors for both postoperative total complications (absolute HGS(AWGS consensus): OR  2.03, 95%CI:1.05-3.93; HGS/BMI: OR  2.12, 95%CI 1.05-4.28; HGS/age: OR  2.79, 95%CI 1.40-5.54) and malnutrition (absolute HGS(AWGS consensus): OR   2.01, 95%CI 1.10-3.67; HGS/BMI: OR  2.28, 95%CI 1.20-4.33; HGS/age: OR   2.70, 95%CI 1.42-5.14). Low absolute HGS (quartile) was an independent risk factor for malnutrition (OR   1.96, 95%CI 1.04-3.71). Moreover, Low HGS/age was associated with lengthened postoperative hospital stay (OR  2.07, 95%CI 1.12-3.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Except HGS/ASMI, both absolute and relative HGS indicators were associated with postoperative short-term outcomes. Particularly, HGS/age revealed relatively better predictive value for the studied outcomes.

Calf Circumference and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Trend Estimation Approaches

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis and quantify the associations of total mortality with calf circumference (CC) in adults 18 years and older via combining various analyses based on empirical dichotomic CC, continuous CC, and dose-response CC.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science published through April 12, 2022. This systematic review includes longitudinal observational studies reporting the relationships of total mortality with CC. We calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of total mortality with CC per 1 cm for each study and combined the values using standard meta-analysis approaches. Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach (GRADE), and the Instrument for assessing the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) were assessed for meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Our analysis included a total of 37 cohort studies involving 62,736 participants, across which moderate heterogeneity was observed (I2=75.7%, P<0.001), but no publication bias was found. Study quality scores ranged from 6 to 9 (mean 7.7), with only three studies awarded a score of 6 (fair quality). We observed an inverse trend between total death risk and CC per 1 cm increase (RR, 0.95, 95% CI, 0.94-0.96; P<0.001; GRADE quality=high). Only a very slight difference was found among residents of nursing homes (6.9% mortality risk reduction per one cm CC increase), community-dwellers (5.4%), and those living in hospitals (4.8%), respectively (P for meta-regression=0.617). Low credible subgroup difference was found based on the ICEMAN tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Calf circumference is a valid anthropometric measure for mortality risk prediction in a community, nursing home, or hospital.