1
|
Hladkowicz E, Auais M, Kidd G, McIsaac DI, Miller J. "It's a stressful, trying time for the caretaker": an interpretive description qualitative study of postoperative transitions in care for older adults with frailty from the perspectives of informal caregivers. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:246. [PMID: 38468202 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04826-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults with frailty have surgery at a high rate. Informal caregivers often support the postoperative transition in care. Despite the growing need for family and caregiver support for this population, little is known about the experience of providing informal care to older adults with frailty during the postoperative transition in care. The purpose of this study was to explore what is important during a postoperative transition in care for older adults with frailty from the perspective of informal caregivers. METHODS This was a qualitative study using an interpretive description methodology. Seven informal caregivers to older adults [aged ≥ 65 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale score ≥ 4) who had an inpatient elective surgery] participated in a telephone-based, semi-structured interview. Audio files were transcribed and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Four themes were constructed: (1) being informed about what to expect after surgery; (2) accessible communication with care providers; (3) homecare resources are needed for the patient; and (4) a support network for the caregivers. Theme 4 included two sub-themes: (a) respite and emotional support and (b) occupational support. CONCLUSIONS Transitions in care present challenges for informal caregivers of older adults with frailty, who play an important role in successful transitions. Future postoperative transitional care programs should consider making targeted information, accessible communication, and support networks available for caregivers as part of facilitating successful transitions in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Hladkowicz
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus Room B311, 1053 Carling Ave, Mail Stop 249, K1Y 4E9, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Mohammad Auais
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Gurlavine Kidd
- Patient Partner, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus Room B311, 1053 Carling Ave, Mail Stop 249, K1Y 4E9, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jordan Miller
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bou-Samra P, Kneuertz PJ. Advances in the clinical use of patient-reported outcomes in thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2024; 37:75-78. [PMID: 38085875 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly recognized as a clinical tool for measuring and improving patient-centric care. This review provides a summary on recent advances in the use of PROs in the field of thoracic surgery. RECENT FINDINGS PROs have been used as primary endpoints in clinical trials and observational studies evaluating clinical care pathways and quantifying the benefits of minimally invasive surgical techniques for patients undergoing lung surgery. Qualitative and quantitative research has yielded fundamental insights into which PRO domains are meaningful and valued by patients after lung surgery. Patient experience and recovery after esophagectomy have been further characterized by using PROs. New disease-specific survey tools for patients have been developed to track long-term symptoms after esophageal reconstruction. Patient satisfaction has emerged as the key metric used to gauge the patient centeredness of hospital systems. SUMMARY Advances have been made in the application of PROs in multiple areas of thoracic surgery, which include lung and esophageal surgery. The growing focus on the use of PROs in clinical pathways has led to a better understanding on how to optimize patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Bou-Samra
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
| | - Peter J Kneuertz
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center- James and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vernooij LM, van Waes JAR, Grobben RB, van Lier F, Feng S, Machina M, McKenny M, Nathoe HM, Wijeysundera DN, van Klei WA, Beattie WS. Postoperative myocardial injury phenotypes and self-reported disability in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a multicentre observational study. Br J Anaesth 2024; 132:35-44. [PMID: 38057252 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative myocardial injury (PMI) comprises a spectrum of mechanisms resulting in troponin release. The impact of different PMI phenotypes on postoperative disability remains unknown. METHODS This was a multicentre prospective cohort study including patients aged ≥50 yr undergoing elective major noncardiac surgery. Patients were stratified in five groups based on the occurrence of PMI and clinical information on postoperative adverse events: PMI classified as myocardial infarction (MI; according to fourth definition), PMI plus adverse event other than MI, clinically silent PMI (PMI without adverse events), adverse events without PMI, and neither PMI nor an adverse event (reference). The primary endpoint was 6-month self-reported disability (assessed by WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [WHODAS]). Disability-free survival was defined as WHODAS ≤16%. RESULTS We included 888 patients of mean age 69 (range 53-91) yr, of which 356 (40%) were women; 151 (17%) patients experienced PMI, and 625 (71%) experienced 6-month disability-free survival. Patients with PMI, regardless of its phenotype, had higher preoperative disability scores than patients without PMI (difference in WHODAS; β: 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-6.2), but scores remained stable after surgery (β: 1.2, 95% CI: -3.2-5.6). Before surgery, patients with MI (n=36, 4%) were more disabled compared with patients without PMI and no adverse events (β: 5.5, 95% CI: 0.3-10.8). At 6 months, patients with MI and patients without PMI but with adverse events worsened in disability score (β: 11.2, 95% CI: 2.3-20.2; β: 8.1, 95% CI: 3.0-13.2, respectively). Patients with clinically silent PMI did not change in disability score at 6 months (β: 1.39, 95% CI: -4.50-7.29, P=0.642). CONCLUSIONS Although patients with postoperative myocardial injury had higher preoperative self-reported disability, disability scores did not change at 6 months after surgery. However, patients experiencing myocardial infarction worsened in disability score after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisette M Vernooij
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith A R van Waes
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Remco B Grobben
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Felix van Lier
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Feng
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew Machina
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Michael McKenny
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Hendrik M Nathoe
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Duminda N Wijeysundera
- Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital - Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wilton A van Klei
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - W Scott Beattie
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hladkowicz E, Auais M, Kidd G, McIsaac DI, Miller J. "I can't imagine having to do it on your own": a qualitative study on postoperative transitions in care from the perspectives of older adults with frailty. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:848. [PMID: 38093180 PMCID: PMC10716948 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04576-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults aged 65 and older have surgery more often than younger people and often live with frailty. The postoperative transition in care from hospital to home after surgey is a challenging time for older adults with frailty as they often experience negative outcomes. Improving postoperative transitions in care for older adults with frailty is a priority. However, little knowledge from the perspective of older adults with frailty is available to support meaningful improvements in postoperative transitions in care. OBJECTIVE To explore what is important to older adults with frailty during a postoperative transition in care. METHODS This qualitative study used an interpretive description methodology. Twelve adults aged ≥ 65 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale score ≥ 4) who had an inpatient elective surgery and could speak in English participated in a telephone-based, semi-structured interview. Audio files were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Five themes were constructed: 1) valuing going home after surgery; 2) feeling empowered through knowledge and resources; 3) focusing on medical and functional recovery; 4) informal caregivers and family members play multiple integral roles; and 5) feeling supported by healthcare providers through continuity of care. Each theme had 3 sub-themes. CONCLUSION Future programs should focus on supporting patients to return home by empowering patients with resources and clear communication, ensuring continuity of care, creating access to homecare and virtual support, focusing on functional and medical recovery, and recognizing the invaluable role of informal caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Hladkowicz
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Mohammad Auais
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Gurlavine Kidd
- Patient Engagement in Research Activities, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jordan Miller
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shulman MA, Wallace S, Gilbert A, Reilly JR, Kasza J, Myles PS. Predicting Death or Disability after Surgery in the Older Adult. Anesthesiology 2023; 139:420-431. [PMID: 37432667 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000004683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients are vulnerable to developing new or worsening disability after surgery. Despite this, patient or surgical characteristics predisposing to postoperative disability are poorly defined. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a model, subsequently transformed to point-score form, to predict 6-month death or disability in older patients after surgery. METHODS The authors built a prospective, single-center registry to develop and validate the prediction model. The registry included patients 70 yr of age or older undergoing elective and nonelective, cardiac and noncardiac surgery between May 25, 2017, and February 11, 2021, and combined clinical data from the electronic medical record, hospital administrative data (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification codes) and World Health Organization (Geneva, Switzerland) Disability Assessment Schedule data collected directly from the patients. Death or disability was defined as being dead or having a World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule score 16% or greater. Included patients were randomly divided into model development (70%) and internal validation (30%) cohorts. Once constructed, the logistic regression and point-score models were assessed using the internal validation cohort and an external validation cohort comprising data from a separate randomized trial. RESULTS Of 2,176 patients who completed the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule immediately before surgery, 927 (43%) patients were disabled, and 413 (19%) had significant disability. By 6 months after surgery, 1,640 patients (75%) had data available for the primary outcome analysis. Of these patients, 195 (12%) patients had died, and 691 (42%) were dead or disabled. The developed point-score model included the preoperative World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule score, patient age, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. The point score model retained good discrimination in the internal (area under the curve, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.79) and external (area under the curve, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.80) validation data sets. CONCLUSIONS The authors developed and validated a point score model to predict death or disability in older patients after surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Shulman
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sophie Wallace
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Annie Gilbert
- Data Governance and Security, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer R Reilly
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jessica Kasza
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul S Myles
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hallet J, Sutradhar R, Jerath A, d’Empaire PP, Carrier FM, Turgeon AF, McIsaac DI, Idestrup C, Lorello G, Flexman A, Kidane B, Kaliwal Y, Chan WC, Barabash V, Coburn N, Eskander A. Association Between Familiarity of the Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Dyad and Postoperative Patient Outcomes for Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:465-473. [PMID: 36811886 PMCID: PMC9947805 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.8228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Importance The surgeon-anesthesiologist teamwork and relationship is crucial to good patient outcomes. Familiarity among work team members is associated with enhanced success in multiple fields but rarely studied in the operating room. Objective To examine the association between surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad familiarity-as the number of times working together-with short-term postoperative outcomes for complex gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based retrospective cohort study based in Ontario, Canada, included adults undergoing esophagectomy, pancreatectomy, and hepatectomy for cancer from 2007 through 2018. The data were analyzed January 1, 2007, through December 21, 2018. Exposures Dyad familiarity captured as the annual volume of procedures of interest done by the surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad in the 4 years before the index surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures Ninety-day major morbidity (any Clavien-Dindo grade 3 to 5). The association between exposure and outcome was examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results Seven thousand eight hundred ninety-three patients with a median age of 65 years (66.3% men) were included. They were cared for by 737 anesthesiologists and 163 surgeons who were also included. The median surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad volume was 1 (range, 0-12.2) procedures per year. Ninety-day major morbidity occurred in 43.0% of patients. There was a linear association between dyad volume and 90-day major morbidity. After adjustment, the annual dyad volume was independently associated with lower odds of 90-day major morbidity, with an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98; P = .01) for each incremental procedure per year, per dyad. The results did not change when examining 30-day major morbidity. Conclusions and Relevance Among adults undergoing complex gastrointestinal cancer surgery, increasing familiarity of the surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad was associated with improved short-term patient outcomes. For each additional time that a unique surgeon-anesthesiologist dyad worked together, the odds of 90-day major morbidity decreased by 5%. These findings support organizing perioperative care to increase the familiarity of surgeon-anesthesiologist dyads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Jerath
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pablo Perez d’Empaire
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - François M. Carrier
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexis F. Turgeon
- CHU de Québec–Université Laval Research Centre, Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma– Emergency–Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel I. McIsaac
- Department of Anesthesiology and The Wilson Centre, University Health Network–Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chris Idestrup
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gianni Lorello
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alana Flexman
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Departments of Surgery and of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Paul’s Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Biniam Kidane
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Paul’s Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Victoria Barabash
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Odette Cancer Centre, Division of Surgical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology, St Paul’s Hospital/Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A systematic review of perioperative clinical practice guidelines for care of older adults living with frailty. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:262-271. [PMID: 36707368 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative frailty is prevalent and requires complex management, which could be guided by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). The objective of this systematic review was to identify and synthesise CPGs that provide perioperative recommendations specific to older adults living with frailty. METHODS After protocol registration, we performed a systematic review of CPGs. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and 14 grey literature databases were searched (January 1, 2000 until December 22, 2021). We included all CPGs that contained at least one frailty-specific recommendation related to any phase of the perioperative period. We compiled all relevant recommendations, extracted underlying strength of evidence, and categorised them by perioperative phase of care. Within each phase, recommendations were synthesised inductively into themes. Quality of CPGs was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS From 4707 citations, 13 guidelines were included; 8/13 were focused on the perioperative care of older surgical patients in general. Among 110 recommendations extracted, 37 themes were generated, with the majority pertaining to preoperative care. Four themes were supported by strong evidence: performing preoperative frailty assessments, using multidimensional frailty instruments, reducing urinary catheter use, and following multidisciplinary care and communication throughout the perioperative period. Per AGREE II, most guidelines (8/13; 62%) were recommended for use with modifications. CONCLUSIONS Despite increasing numbers of patients living with frailty, few guidelines exist that address frailty-specific perioperative care. Given the lack of strong evidence-based recommendations, particularly outside the preoperative period, high-quality primary research is required to underpin future guidelines and better inform the care of older surgical patients with frailty. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL PROSPERO CRD42022320149.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gottesman D, McIsaac DI. Frailty and emergency surgery: identification and evidence-based care for vulnerable older adults. Anaesthesia 2022; 77:1430-1438. [PMID: 36089855 DOI: 10.1111/anae.15860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Frailty is a multidimensional state related to accumulation of age- and disease-related deficits across multiple domains. Older people represent the fastest growing segment of the peri-operative population, and 25-50% of older surgical patients live with frailty. When frailty is present before surgery, adjusted rates of morbidity and mortality increase at least two-fold; the odds of delirium and loss of independence are increased more than four- and five-fold, respectively. Care of the older person with frailty presenting for emergency surgery requires individualised and evidence-based care given the high-risk and complex nature of their presentations. Before surgery, frailty should be assessed using a multidimensional frailty instrument (most likely the Clinical Frailty Scale), and all members of the peri-operative team should be aware of each patient's frailty status. When frailty is present, pre-operative care should focus on documenting and communicating individualised risk, considering advanced care directives and engaging shared decision-making when feasible. Shared multidisciplinary care should be initiated. Peri-operatively, analgesia that avoids polypharmacy should be provided, along with delirium prevention strategies and consideration of postoperative care in a monitored environment. After the acute surgical episode, transition out of hospital requires that adequate support be in place, along with clear discharge instructions, and review of new and existing prescription medications. Advanced care directives should be reviewed or initiated in case of readmission. Overall, substantial knowledge gaps about the optimal peri-operative care of older people with frailty must be addressed through robust, patient-oriented research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gottesman
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospita, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - D I McIsaac
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospital, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alkadri J, Aucoin SD, McDonald B, Grubic N, McIsaac DI. Association of frailty with days alive at home in critically ill patients undergoing emergency general surgery: a population-based cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2022; 129:536-543. [PMID: 36031415 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty is an established risk factor for morbidity and mortality in older patients undergoing surgery. In people with critical illness before surgery, few data describe patient-centred outcomes. Our objective was to estimate the association of frailty with postoperative days alive at home in older critically ill patients requiring emergency general surgery. METHODS A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using linked administrative health data in Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2019. All individuals aged ≥66 yr with an ICU admission before emergency general surgery were included. We compared the count of days alive at home at 30 and 365 days after surgery based on frailty status using a validated, multidimensional index. Unadjusted and multilevel, multivariable adjusted effect estimates were calculated. A sensitivity analysis based on early recovery category was performed. RESULTS We identified 7003 eligible patients; 2063 (29.5%) lived with frailty. At 30 days, mean days alive at home with frailty were 4.5 (standard deviation 8.2) and 7.6 (standard deviation 10.2) in those without frailty. In adjusted analysis, frailty was associated with fewer days alive at home at 30 (ratio of means [RoM] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.78; P<0.001) and 365 days (RoM 0.72; 95% CI: 0.64-0.82; P<0.001). Individuals with frailty had a higher probability of poor recovery status, with effects increasing across the first postoperative month. CONCLUSIONS In patients with critical illness requiring emergency general surgery, frailty is associated with fewer days alive at home. This information should be discussed with critically ill patients before emergent surgical intervention to better inform decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamal Alkadri
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; ICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
| | - Sylvie D Aucoin
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Bernard McDonald
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Division of Cardiac Anesthesiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Grubic
- ICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; ICES, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McIsaac DI, Fergusson DA, Khadaroo R, Meliambro A, Muscedere J, Gillis C, Hladkowicz E, Taljaard M. PREPARE trial: a protocol for a multicentre randomised trial of frailty-focused preoperative exercise to decrease postoperative complication rates and disability scores. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064165. [PMID: 35940835 PMCID: PMC9364396 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frailty is a strong predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes. Prehabilitation may improve outcomes after surgery for older people with frailty by addressing physical and physiologic deficits. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of home-based multimodal prehabilitation in decreasing patient-reported disability and postoperative complications in older people with frailty having major surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of home-based prehabilitation versus standard care among consenting patients >60 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale>4) having elective inpatient major non-cardiac, non-neurologic or non-orthopaedic surgery. Patients will be partially blinded; clinicians and outcome assessors will be fully blinded. The intervention consists of >3 weeks of prehabilitation (exercise (strength, aerobic and stretching) and nutrition (advice and protein supplementation)). The study has two primary outcomes: in-hospital complications and patient-reported disability 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include survival, lower limb function, quality of life and resource utilisation. A sample size of 750 participants (375 per arm) provides >90% power to detect a minimally important absolute difference of 8 on the 100-point patient-reported disability scale and a 25% relative risk reduction in complications, using a two-sided alpha value of 0.025 to account for the two primary outcomes. Analyses will follow intention to treat principles for all randomised participants. All participants will be followed to either death or up to 1 year. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been granted by Clinical Trials Ontario (Project ID: 1785) and our ethics review board (Protocol Approval #20190409-01T). Results will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences, through peer-reviewed publication, stakeholder organisations and engagement of social and traditional media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04221295.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel I McIsaac
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Khadaroo
- Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amanda Meliambro
- Patient Engagement, Ottawa Hospital General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Chelsia Gillis
- School of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily Hladkowicz
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monica Taljaard
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wijeysundera DN, Alibhai SMH, Ladha KS, Puts MTE, Chesney TR, Daza JF, Ehtesham S, Hladkowicz E, Lebovic G, Mazer CD, van Vlymen JM, Wei AC, McIsaac DI. Functional Improvement Trajectories After Surgery (FIT After Surgery) study: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study to evaluate significant new disability after major surgery in older adults. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062524. [PMID: 35732384 PMCID: PMC9226941 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults prioritise surviving surgery, but also preservation of their functional status and quality of life. Current approaches to measure postoperative recovery, which focus on death, complications and length of hospitalisation, may miss key relevant domains. We propose that postoperative disability is an important patient-centred outcome to measure intermediate-to-long recovery after major surgery in older adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Functional Improvement Trajectories After Surgery (FIT After Surgery) study is a multicentre cohort study of 2000 older adults (≥65 years) having major non-cardiac surgery. Its objectives are to characterise the incidence, trajectories, risk factors and impact of new significant disability after non-cardiac surgery. Disability is assessed using WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 instrument and participants' level-of-care needs. Disability assessments occur before surgery, and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. The primary outcome is significantly worse WHODAS score or death at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes are (1) significantly worse WHODAS score or death at 1 year after surgery, (2) increased care needs or death at 6 months after surgery and (3) increased care needs or death at 1 year after surgery. We will use multivariable logistic regression models to determine the association of preoperative characteristics and surgery type with outcomes, joint modelling to characterise longitudinal time trends in WHODAS scores over 12 months after surgery, and longitudinal latent class mixture models to identify clusters following similar trajectories of disability. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The FIT After Surgery study has received research ethics board approval at all sites. Recruitment began in December 2019 but was placed on hold in March 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Recruitment was gradually restarted in October 2020, with 1-year follow-up expected to finish in 2023. Publication of the primary results is anticipated to occur in 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duminda N Wijeysundera
- Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karim S Ladha
- Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martine T E Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tyler R Chesney
- Division of General Surgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julian F Daza
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sahar Ehtesham
- Applied Health Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Hladkowicz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gerald Lebovic
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - C David Mazer
- Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janet M van Vlymen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wijeysundera DN. What defines success after major surgery? Can J Anaesth 2022; 69:687-692. [PMID: 35396650 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02248-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Duminda N Wijeysundera
- Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital - Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|