Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine enhances the chemosensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine

SPARC enhances 5-FU chemosensitivity in gastric cancer by modulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition and apoptosis

Previous studies have shown that secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) proteins can inhibit the development of cancer cells in various ways, such as by inhibiting angiogenesis and inhibiting cell proliferation. In fact, SPARC proteins may have an effect on the chemoresistance of gastric cancer cells to 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), which needs further research in the future. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between SPARC proteins and the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells to 5-FU. In vitro, after SPARC protein levels were regulated by plasmid, siRNA and human recombinant SPARC protein transfection in MGC-803, SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells, we detected epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), apoptosis markers and cell viability after 5-FU treatment. In vivo, we implanted BGC-823 cells with stable SPARC overexpression into nude mice. Tumour size was measured to assess the effect of SPARC protein on tumour formation and 5-FU chemosensitivity. In SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells, both endogenous and exogenous upregulation of SPARC protein levels decreased cell viability, destroyed cytoskeletal F-actin, inhibited cell migration, and downregulated a series of transcription factors to inhibit cell EMT; it also upregulated cell apoptosis-related proteins to promote cell apoptosis. However, we obtained opposite results in SPARC knockdown MGC-803 cells. In vivo, compared with the control group, the group engrafted with BGC-823 cells stably overexpressing SPARC had a significant smaller tumour size. After 5-FU treatment, the new tumour gradually decreased in size. Our results show that the SPARC protein could enhance 5-FU chemosensitivity in gastric cancer cell lines by inhibiting EMT and promoting cell apoptosis.

SPARC promotes pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and migration through autocrine secretion into the extracellular milieu

SPARC is a secreted glycoprotein that plays a complex and multifaceted role in tumour formation and progression. However, whether SPARC is an oncogene or a tumour suppressor is still unclear. Moreover, SPARC demonstrates potential in clinical pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) treatment, although it has been identified as an oncogene in some studies and a tumor suppressor in others. In the present study, a pan-cancer analysis of SPARC was carried out using The Cancer genome Atlas data, which demonstrated that SPARC was an oncogene in most cancer types and a cancer suppressor in others. In addition, SPARC expression was significantly upregulated in PAAD and associated with poor prognosis. SPARC also promoted the proliferation and migration of PANC-1 and SW1990 cell lines in vitro. SPARC was detected in the culture supernatant of PAAD cells and pancreatic acinar AR42J cells. SPARC regulated PAAD cell proliferation only when secreted into the extracellular milieu, thus explaining why the prognosis of patients with PAAD is correlated with the SPARC expression of both tumour cells and stromal cells. Collectively, the present findings demonstrated that the function of SPARC was associated with tumour type and that SPARC may represent an important oncogene in PAAD that merits further study.

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine gene variants: Impact on susceptibility and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) is a glycoprotein involved in extracellular matrix remodeling, which regulates cell growth. It could be involved in hepatic fibrogenesis related to chronic inflammations, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) angiogenesis, and tumor progression. We aimed to study the expressions of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the SPARC gene and their impact on susceptibility and survival of HCC patients.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study on 200 HCC patients and 50 matched healthy controls. All patients were subjected to laboratory investigations, ultrasound, and real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect the genetic polymorphisms (rs3210714, rs11950384, and rs7719521) in the SPARC gene in the blood.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty (80%) patients were men with a mean age of 43 years. The SPARC gene showed a significant higher prevalence of rs3210714 mutation (i.e. AA or AG) and a significant lower prevalence of rs11950384 mutation (i.e. AA or AC) among HCC patients in comparison with controls (83% vs 22%, P ≤ 0.001) and (65.5 vs 86%, P = 0.005), respectively, while rs7719521 mutation did not reach significance. On univariate and multivariate analyses, elder age and having at least one copy of the mutant rs3210714 were associated with a significantly increased risk of HCC (P < 0.001 for both), whereas the presence of at least one copy of the mutant rs11950384 carried a significantly reduced risk of having HCC (P < 0.01). Overall survival did not differ significantly between any of the SPARC gene mutation groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPARC gene polymorphisms had a diverse impact on the susceptibility of HCC due to its ability to inhibit or promote tumor progression. SPARC gene polymorphisms were not related to survival of our HCC patients, and probably, this needs further analysis of other SPARC gene nucleotides.

The interaction between SPARC and GRP78 interferes with ER stress signaling and potentiates apoptosis via PERK/eIF2α and IRE1α/XBP-1 in colorectal cancer

Therapy-refractory disease is one of the main contributors of treatment failure in cancer. In colorectal cancer (CRC), SPARC can function as a sensitizer to conventional chemotherapy by enhancing apoptosis by interfering with the activity of Bcl-2. Here, we examine a novel mechanism by which SPARC further potentiates apoptosis via its modulation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Using mass spectrometry to identify SPARC-associated proteins, GRP78 was identified as a protein partner for SPARC in CRC. In vitro studies conducted to assess the signaling events resulting from this interaction, included induction of ER stress with tunicamycin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and irinotecan (CPT-11). We found that the interaction between GRP78 and SPARC increased during exposure to 5-FU, CPT-11, and tunicamycin, resulting in an attenuation of GRP78’s inhibition of apoptosis. In addition, we also show that SPARC can sensitize CRC cells to PERK/eIF2α and IRE1α/XBP-1 UPR signaling by interfering with ER stress following binding to GRP78, which leads to ER stress-associated cell death in CRC cells. In line with these findings, a lower expression of GRP78 relative to SPARC in CRC is associated with a lower IC₅₀ for 5-FU in either sensitive or therapy-refractory CRC cells. Interestingly, this observation correlates with tissue microarray analysis of 143 human CRC, where low GRP78 to SPARC expression level was prognostic of higher survival rate (P = 0.01) in individuals with CRC. This study demonstrates that modulation of UPR signaling by SPARC promotes ER stress-associated death and potentiates apoptosis. This may be an effective strategy that can be combined with current treatment options to improve therapeutic efficacy in CRC.

Do anti-stroma therapies improve extrinsic resistance to increase the efficacy of gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most devastating human malignancies, with approximately 20-30% of PDAC patients receiving the surgical resection with curative intent. Although many studies have focused on finding ideal "drug chaperones" that facilitate and/or potentiate the effects of gemcitabine (GEM) in pancreatic cancer, a significant benefit in overall survival could not be demonstrated for any of these combination therapies in PDAC. Given that pancreatic cancer is characterized by desmoplasia and the dual biological roles of stroma in pancreatic cancer, we reassess the importance of stroma in GEM-based therapeutic approaches in light of current findings. This review is focused on understanding the role of stromal components in the extrinsic resistance to GEM and whether anti-stroma therapies have a positive effect on the GEM delivery. This work contributes to the development of novel and promising combination GEM-based regimens that have achieved significant survival benefits for the patients with pancreatic cancer.