Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-Arm Study

Technological Developments and Quality of Life in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Review of the Modern Insulin Analogues, Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Pump Therapy

BACKGROUND

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is a chronic autoimmune disease, which is characterized by an increased prevalence worldwide, which, in fact, tends to take extensive dimensions. The recent rapid development of science and technology has significantly contributed to the improvement of the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus, both in achieving the required euglycaemic regulation and reducing the psychological burden associated with the disease, consequently improving the quality of life of the patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A literature review from 2010, related to the contribution of the modern insulin analogues, continuous glucose monitoring and the insulin pump, was performed using Scopus, ScienceDirect and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

Studies included in the review support a direct and indirect association of technological innovations with the quality of life. The use of type 1 diabetes mellitus technology was negatively associated with the frequency of the hypoglycaemias and the value of the glycosylated hemoglobin, while at the same time, the development and use of the related technology were highly associated with an improvement in the quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Patients' quality of life is an indicator of the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus, and it is just as important as glycaemic regulation. Through this review, it was concluded that a better quality of life of T1DM patients was associated with the improvement of glycosylated hemoglobin and hypoglycemic episodes.

Budget Impact of the Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Medicaid Diabetes Beneficiaries Treated with Intensive Insulin Therapy

Objective: We assessed the economic impact of using the newest flash continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes treated with intensive insulin therapy (IIT). Research Design and Methods: A budget impact analysis was created to assess the impact of increasing the proportion of Medicaid beneficiaries with diabetes on IIT, who use flash CGM by 10%. The analysis included glucose monitoring device costs, cost savings due to reductions in glycated hemoglobin, severe hypoglycemia events, and hyperglycemic emergencies such as diabetic ketoacidosis. The net change in costs per person to adopt flash CGM for three populations treated with IIT (adults with type 1 diabetes [T1D] or type 2 diabetes [T2D], and children and adolescents with T1D or T2D) was calculated; these costs were used to estimate the impact of increasing flash CGM use by 10% to the U.S. Medicaid budget over 1-3 years. Results: The analysis found that flash CGM demonstrated cost savings in all populations on a per patient basis. Increasing use of flash CGM by 10% was associated with a $19.4 million overall decrease in costs over the year and continued to reduce costs by $25.3 million in years 2 and 3. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the new flash CGM system can offer cost savings compared to blood glucose monitoring in Medicaid beneficiaries treated with IIT, especially T1D adults, and children and adolescents. These findings support expanding access to CGM by Medicaid plans.