Correlation between motor performance scales, body composition, and anthropometry in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Validity of bioelectrical impedance to estimate fat-free mass in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

The evaluation of fat-free mass (FFM) in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is useful to investigate disease progression and therapeutic efficacy. This study aimed to validate the Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) method compared with the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for estimating the %FFM in boys with DMD. This is a cross-sectional study performed with children and adolescents diagnosed with DMD. Resistance and reactance were measured with a BIA analyzer, from which eight predictive equations estimated the %FFM. The %FFM was also determined by DXA and its used as a reference method. Pearson correlation test, coefficient of determination, the root-mean-square error, the interclass correlation coefficient, and linear regression analysis were performed between %FFM values obtained by BIA and DXA. The agreement between these values was verified with the Bland-Altman plot analysis. Forty-six boys aged from 5 to 20 years were enrolled in the study. All the equations showed a correlation between the %FFM estimated by BIA and determined by DXA (p < 0.05). The Bland-Altman method indicated that two equations have a significant bias (p < 0.05) and six equations showed no significant bias of %FFM (p > 0.05). However, one of them has high variation and wide limits of agreement. Five of eight %FFM predictive equations tested in DMD were accurate when compared with the DXA. It can be concluded that BIA is a validity method to evaluate patients with DMD.

Should the Gross Motor Function Classification System be used for children who do not have cerebral palsy?

This literature review addressed four questions. (1) In which populations other than cerebral palsy (CP) has the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) been applied? (2) In what types of study, and why was it used? (3) How was it modified to facilitate these applications? (4) What justifications and evidence of psychometric adequacy were used to support its application? A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases (January 1997 to April 2017) using the terms: 'GMFCS' OR 'Gross Motor Function Classification System' yielded 2499 articles. 118 met inclusion criteria and reported children/adults with 133 health conditions/clinical descriptions other than CP. Three broad GMFCS applications were observed: as a categorization tool, independent variable, or outcome measure. While the GMFCS is widely used for children with health conditions/clinical description other than CP, researchers rarely provided adequate justification for these uses. We offer recommendations for development/validation of other condition-specific classification systems and discuss the potential need for a generic gross motor function classification system.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

The Gross Motor Function Classification System should not be used outside cerebral palsy or as an outcome measure. The authors provide recommendations for development and validation of condition-specific or generic classification systems.

Body composition of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: the Greek experience

Greece ranks among the first countries suffering from the obesity epidemic globally. The aim of the study was to evaluate body composition in Greek patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We hypothesized that able-bodied patients would not differ from controls, in terms of adiposity, based on clinical observations during everyday practice.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of steroid-dependent DMD subjects, who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and laboratory metabolic bone profile evaluation. Forty-two patients and thirty-one controls were studied. Overall, DMD subjects were shorter (height Z-score = -1.4, p = 0.01). Their bone mineral density (BMD) was low (lumbar spine BMD Z-score = -1.2, p < 0.01, subcranial total body BMD Z-score = -1.8, p < 0.01). Lean tissue mass (LTM) was also decreased (LTM Z-score = -2.2, p < 0.01). The above findings were more pronounced in adolescence. Regarding adiposity, increased fat mass (FM) was found only in pubertal DMD patients (FM Z-score = 1.4, p < 0.01), whereas prepubertal, able-bodied patients did not differ from controls, thus confirming the initial hypothesis. Finally, 65 % of DMD subjects had increased bone resorption markers and 57 % had suboptimal vitamin D levels. The importance of using native population as controls for body composition analysis is highlighted. In Greece, abnormal body composition in DMD patients is more striking when loss of ambulation occurs and not during the prepubertal period, due to the concurrent presence of obesity in the pediatric population. Thus, adolescents with this neuromuscular disorder should be targeted toward prompt lifestyle interventions.

Utility of skinfold thickness measurement in non-ambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Nutritional disorders in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) worsen the medical condition. In particular, obesity is a serious problem that increases the risk of cardiomyopathy and affects nursing care. However, it is often difficult to evaluate body fatness in the advanced stages of DMD. Skinfold thickness measurement is a classical method to evaluate body fatness and is easily performed, even for bed-bound patients at home. We aimed to investigate the utility of skinfold thickness measurement in non-ambulatory DMD patients. Twenty-two patients with non-ambulatory, steroid-naive DMD ranging in age of 12-47 years were evaluated by body mass index (BMI), blood tests, measurement of triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), and abdominal computed tomography (CT) measurement of the areas of both subcutaneous and visceral fat. TSF showed good correlation with BMI (r = 0.80; p < 0.001), serum triglycerides (r = 0.67; p < 0.01), area of subcutaneous fat (r = 0.85; p < 0.0001), and area of visceral fat (r = 0.76; p < 0.0001). These results indicate the skinfold thickness measurement may be applicable as a screening tool in clinical practice where CT and magnetic resonance imaging assessment is often difficult in patients with advanced DMD.