Adverse Events Associated with Fosfomycin Use: Review of the Literature and Analyses of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database

Intravenous Fosfomycin as Adjunctive Therapy for Gram-Negative Bacteria Bloodstream Infections: A Propensity Score Adjusted Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The role of intravenous fosfomycin (iv-FOS) as a part of combination therapy for Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI) needs to be evaluated in clinical practice, as in vitro data show potential efficacy.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with a GNB-BSI from 01 January 2021 to 01 April 2023 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. A Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality; an inverse-probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW) analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 363 patients were enrolled: 211 (58%) males, with a median (q1-q3) age of 68 (57-78) years, and a median Charlson comorbidity index of 5 (3-7). At GNB-BSI onset, the median SOFA score was 5 (2-7) and 122 patients (34%) presented with septic shock. Pathogens were principally Klebsiella pneumoniae (42%), Escherichia coli (28%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17%); of them, 36% were carbapenem-resistant. The therapy included carbapenems (40%), cephalosporins (37%) and beta-lactams/beta-lactamases-inhibitors (19%); a combination with iv-FOS was used in 98 (27%) cases at a median dosage of 16 (16-18) g/daily. The use of iv-FOS was not associated with reduced crude mortality (21% vs 29%, P = 0.147). However, on multivariable Cox-regression, combination therapy with iv-FOS resulted in protection for mortality (aHR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.92), but not other combo-therapies (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44-1.16). This result was also confirmed with the IPTW-adjusted Cox model (aHR 0.52, 95% CI 0.31-0.91). Subgroup analysis suggested a benefit in severe infections (SOFA > 6, PITT ≥ 4) and when iv-FOS was initiated within 24 hours of GNB-BSI onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosfomycin in combination therapy for GNB-BSI may have a role in improving survival. These results justify the development of further clinical trials.

Fosfomycin-Containing Regimens for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Case Series Study

Central nervous system infections are among the most severe infectious conditions in the neonatal period and are still burdened by significant mortality, especially in preterm infants and those with a low birth weight or other comorbidities. In this study, we examined the role of fosfomycin-containing antibiotic regimens in neonates with central nervous system infections. We included six neonates over a period of five years: four with meningitis and two with cerebral abscesses. All patients underwent fosfomycin therapy after failing first-line antibiotic regimens. Of the six neonates, two died; two developed neurological and psychomotor deficits and two recovered uneventfully. None of the neonates experienced adverse reactions to fosfomycin, confirming the safety of the molecule in this population. In conclusion, the deep penetration in the central nervous system, the unique mechanism of action, the synergy with other antibiotic therapies, and the excellent safety profile all make fosfomycin an attractive drug for the treatment of neonatal central nervous system infections.

The use of fosfomycin in infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially pneumonia in children: a five-year retrospective single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Fosfomycin is gaining increasing attention for its activity against MDR or XDR pathogens. Currently, IV fosfomycin is a potential option for treating various infections, including urinary tract infections, pneumonia and skin infections when first-line treatments fail.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the demographic, clinical, microbiological and treatment modality of children received IV fosfomycin to treat infections caused by MDR pathogens since there are few data on the use of fosfomycin in children.

METHODS

This study was conducted retrospectively with patients under 18 years of age who were treated with IV fosfomycin for at least 72 h due to infections caused by MDR pathogens between January 2019 and October 2023 at Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye. Data on demographic and clinical features, microbiological findings, treatment modalities and side effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five children, for a total of 32 cases of infection episodes, with a mean age of 11.4 ± 3.92 years who received IV fosfomycin were included. The most frequent comorbidity was chronic pulmonary diseases, and the most common infection needed for IV fosfomycin was MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. In all cases, fosfomycin was administered in combination with other antibiotics, mainly meropenem-colistin (68.7%) or meropenem (15.6%). Twenty-two (71.9%) cases had favourable clinical responses at the end of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that IV fosfomycin may be an effective treatment option for MDR pathogens in the paediatric population. Nevertheless, careful stewardship is necessary to maintain efficacy and reduce antimicrobial resistance selection risk.

Adverse events during intravenous fosfomycin therapy in a real-life scenario. Risk factors and the potential role of therapeutic drug monitoring

BACKGROUND

Intravenous fosfomycin (IVFOF) is gaining interest in severe infections. Its use may be limited by adverse events (AEs). Little experience exists on IVFOF therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in real-life setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of patients receiving IVFOF for > 48 h at Policlinico Hospital (Milan, Italy) from 01/01/2019 to 01/01/2023. AEs associated to IVFOF graded CTCAE ≥ II were considered. Demographic and clinical risk factors for IVFOF-related AEs were analysed with simple and multivariable regression models. The determination of IVFOF TDM was made by a rapid ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) on plasma samples. The performance of TDM (trough levels (Cmin) in intermittent infusion, steady state levels (Css) in continuous infusion) in predicting AEs ≤ 5 days after its assessment was evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-four patients were included. At IVFOF initiation, 81/224 (36.2%) patients were in ICU and 35/224 (15.7%) had septic shock. The most frequent infection site was the low respiratory tract (124/224, 55.4%). Ninety-five patients (42.4%) experienced ≥ 1AEs, with median time of 4.0 (2.0-7.0) days from IVFOF initiation. Hypernatremia was the most frequent AE (53/224, 23.7%). Therapy discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 38/224 (17.0%). ICU setting, low respiratory tract infections and septic shock resulted associated with AEs (RRadjusted 1.59 (95%CI:1.09-2.31), 1.46 (95%CI:1.03-2.07) and 1.73 (95%CI:1.27-2.37), respectively), while IVFOF daily dose did not. Of the 68 patients undergone IVFOF TDM, TDM values predicted overall AEs and hypernatremia with AUROC of 0.65 (95%CI:0.44-0.86) and 0.91 (95%CI:0.79-1.0) respectively for Cmin, 0.67 (95%CI:0.39-0.95) and 0.76 (95%CI:0.52-1.0) respectively for Css.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided real world data on the use of IVFOF-based regimens and associated AEs. IVFOF TDM deserves further research as it may represent a valid tool to predict AEs.

KEY POINTS

Real world data on intravenous fosfomycin for severe bacterial infections. AEs occurred in over 40% (therapy discontinuation in 17%) and were related to baseline clinical severity but not to fosfomycin dose. TDM showed promising results in predicting AEs.

Effect of fosfomycin-induced hypernatremia on patients' hospital stay length and survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hypernatremia is a possible side effect of intravenous fosfomycin. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of changes in sodium (Na) levels on hospital stay and survival in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit receiving fosfomycin.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted retrospectively on the files of patients over the age of 60, who were admitted to the Internal Medicine Intensive Care Unit. Plasma sodium levels were observed and documented over a period of 14 days. The patients were divided into two groups (Hypernatremia group Na > 145 mEq/L vs normonatremia group 135-145 mEq/L). In addition, daily sodium changes were noted for 14 days in patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 75 years. Hospitalization days were longer for hypernatremia patients (31.5 days vs 41 days, p = 0.003). Patients with hypernatremia had an extended duration of stay in the intensive care unit. (21 days vs 31 days p = 0.002). The 1-month survival rate was 61.4% in patients with hypernatremia and 24.9% in patients without hypernatremia (p = 0.004). The absence of hypernatremia increases mortality by 2.09 times (95% CI 1.35-3.23). When discharge and mortality rates were analyzed according to sodium fluctuation, discharged patients exhibited a lower sodium fluctuation (4 min/max (-10/19) vs 6 min/max (-16/32) p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the strength of our study is that it specifically focuses on the consequences of the sodium fluctuation on patient management and provides results.

Back to the Future: Intravenous Fosfomycin is Safe and Effective for the Treatment of Complicated Infections in Children

BACKGROUND

Despite its broad spectrum and excellent safety profile, fosfomycin is still rarely used in pediatrics, with very limited experience from clinicians.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all children admitted to Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy, and treated with fosfomycin for any serious infection. Children with immunodeficiency and oncologic diseases were excluded. Of each, we reported and analyzed demographic and clinical data.

RESULTS

The clinical charts of 20 patients were reviewed and analyzed. The mean age was 10.2 years. Most children were males (85%). Most patients treated had an osteo-articular infection (65%). In our sample, 7 patients (35%) had an underlying comorbidity. The causative agent was isolated in 14 cases (70%). All patients were treated with a combination of 2-3 antibiotics, including fosfomycin. The average duration of antibiotic treatment was 18 days. After treatment, 8 patients (40%) experienced a mild adverse reaction, possibly correlated with the administration of fosfomycin. All patients were discharged in good clinical condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study reports on a sample of pediatric patients with complicated infections where administration of fosfomycin led to eradication of the disease with little or no side effects. Role of the underlying condition and concomitant medication in causing the reaction could not be ruled out. These data suggest that fosfomycin is an effective and safe antibiotic in the pediatric population, particularly for deep-seated infections sustained by multi-drug resistant pathogens.

Reintroduction of Legacy Antibiotics in Neonatal Sepsis: The Special Role of Fosfomycin and Colistin

Neonatal sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance is a rapidly growing global problem. A significant proportion of the pathogens that commonly cause neonatal sepsis are resistant to multiple antibiotics. Therefore, for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis, the repurposing of older antibiotics that are effective against multidrug-resistant pathogens is being investigated. This review aims to provide an overview of current research and experience using the repurposed antibiotics colistin and fosfomycin for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis. Based on current knowledge, colistin and fosfomycin may be potentially helpful for the empirical treatment of sepsis in neonates due to their efficacy against a wide range of pathogens and acceptable safety profile.

Fosfomycin-Induced Liver Injury: A Case Report

Fosfomycin is an antibiotic frequently used to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. It is normally well-tolerated, but there are some reports of clinically relevant liver injury. We present the case of a 73-year-old female who presented with paucisymptomatic hepatocellular acute liver injury six days after taking fosfomycin. After ruling out viral, ischemic, and autoimmune hepatitis, as well as Wilson disease and biliary disorders, she was diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) related to fosfomycin. The patient showed major improvement during the first week and the resolution of liver injury one month after onset. This case report aims to underscore the potential hepatotoxicity of fosfomycin.

Fosfomycin-induced agranulocytosis: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The intravenous form of fosfomycin, a bactericide antibiotic used to treat multiresistant bacterial infections is little prescribed. The most common reported adverse effects are hypokaliemia and hypernatremia. We describe a case of agranulocytosis, a rarely described side effect that may be fatal.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 45 year-old woman was admitted to the intensive care unit for post-surgical meningitis following meningioma resection. Meropenem and vancomycin were first introduced. A DRESS-syndrom with meropenem was suspected. Neutropenia was diagnosed three days after the introduction of parenteral fosfomycin and agranulocytosis four days later. Eosinophilia was also observed. A bone marrow aspiration was performed showing a disappearance of the neutrophil granulocyte line and a significant eosinophilia. Meropenem was discontinued. Fosfomycin was maintained and filgrastim was added. As filgrastim had no effect, the relationship with fosfomycin was suspected, so it was then withheld. An increase of the neutrophil count was observed. Because of the complexity of the case, the unfavorable course of the illness and the urgent need for revision surgery, a rechallenge with fosfomycin was done followed by a decrease of the neutrophil count.

CONCLUSION

This is the third paper reporting agranulocytosis induced by fosfomycin, and the first detailed description of a case. Based on chronological and semiological criteria and bibliographic data, the event was qualified as probable with the Naranjo adverse drug probability scale. Literature data is scarce. The summary of product characteristics mentions that only a few cases of transient neutropenia and agranulocytosis have been reported. An analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database highlighted a higher than expected frequency of agranulocytosis in patients treated with fosfomycin. Parenteral fosfomycin is often used in patients receiving other medications, so that it is rarely the only suspect. In our case, the results of the bone marrow aspiration, the sudden drop of the neutrophil count with concomitant eosinophilia and the absence of improvement despite the dose decrease, point towards an immuno-allergic mechanism. However, the overlap between the suspected DRESS induced by meropenem and the agranulocytosis do not allow to conclude with certainty on the causality. Awareness should be raised about this side effect.

Clinical Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin in Critical Care Patients in Taiwan

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical use and side effects of fosfomycin in critically ill patients in Taiwan. Forty-two patients (mean age, 69.9 years; female, 69%) who received fosfomycin were included from a teaching hospital in Taiwan from January 2021 to December 2021. We analyzed the prescription pattern of intravenous fosfomycin and evaluated patient safety profiles, clinical successes, and microbiological cure rates. The main indication was urinary tract infections (35.6%), and the most frequently identified pathogen was Escherichia coli (18.2%). The overall clinical success was 83.4%, with one multidrug-resistant pathogen isolated from eight patients (19.0%). The average dose of fosfomycin given was 11.1 ± 5.2 g/day. The average duration of therapy was 8.7 ± 5.9 days, with a median duration of 8 days, where fosfomycin was mostly (83.3%) given in combination. Fosfomycin was given 12 hourly to a maximum number (47.6%) of cases. The incidence rates of adverse drug reactions (hypernatremia and hypokalemia) were 33.33% (14/42) and 28.57% (12/42), respectively. The overall survival rate was 73.8%. Intravenous fosfomycin may be an effective and safe antibiotic to use in combination with other drugs for empirical broad-spectrum or highly suspected multidrug-resistant infections in critically ill patients.

The Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin in Clinical Practice: A 5-Year Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Italy

Fosfomycin in intravenous (IV) formulation has re-emerged as a valuable tool in the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infections because of its broad spectrum of antibacterial action and pharmacokinetic characteristics. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate how fosfomycin was used in patients admitted to the Polyclinic of Palermo between January 2017 and July 2022. Clinical indications, therapeutic associations, clinical outcomes, and any side effects were analyzed. Intravenous fosfomycin was used in 343 patients, 63% male, with a mean age of 68 years (range 15-95). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) were the main indications for treatment (19% and 18% of the total cases, respectively), followed by skin and soft tissue infections and sepsis. IV fosfomycin was administered in combination with other antibacterial agents, the most common of which were ceftazidime/avibactam (35%), meropenem (17%), and colistin (14%). Nineteen patients received it as monotherapy for UTIs. About 66% had resolution of the infectious process with clinical remission (cure or discharge). Electrolyte disturbances occurred in 2.6% and gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 2.9%. The data showed that IV fosfomycin is a safe and effective therapeutic option in the treatment of infections with multidrug-resistant microorganisms.

A multicentre, retrospective audit of fosfomycin use for urinary tract infections in Australian children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to MDR organisms are increasingly common. The lack of paediatric data on efficacious antibiotics makes UTI treatment particularly challenging. Data on the efficacy of fosfomycin use for UTI in children are variable.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective audit of children aged 0-18 years who were treated with fosfomycin for UTI at seven tertiary paediatric hospitals in Australia over a 7 year period, from 2014 to 2020.

RESULTS

Ninety-one children with a median age of 5 years (range 2 months to 18 years) received oral fosfomycin for UTI. The majority (57/91, 63%) had one or more comorbidity, with the most common being renal tract anomalies (24/91, 26%). Fifty-nine (65%) had febrile UTI, 14/91 (15%) had pyelonephritis and 1/91 (1%) was bacteraemic. A majority (80/91, 88%) of urinary cultures had an ESBL-producing Gram-negative pathogen isolated. Fosfomycin susceptibility was evident in all 80 isolates tested. For uncomplicated UTI, the most common dose in children aged <1, 1-12 and >12 years was 1, 2 and 3 g, respectively. For complicated UTI, doses of 2 and 3 g were most common. The median duration of fosfomycin administration was 5 days (range 1-82). Clinical cure was achieved in 84/90 (93%); the six with treatment failure had underlying comorbidities. Overall, 2/91 (2%) children experienced drug-related adverse effects comprising gastrointestinal symptoms in both, which resolved after treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosfomycin is well tolerated and associated with favourable treatment outcomes in children with UTI. Further research on the optimal dosing strategy is required.

Population plasma and urine pharmacokinetics and the probability of target attainment of fosfomycin in healthy male volunteers

PURPOSE

A population pharmacokinetic model of fosfomycin was developed in healthy volunteers after intravenous administration, and different dosing regimens were evaluated in terms of the probability of target attainment for Escherichia coli using both plasma and urinary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets.

METHODS

Eight healthy men received fosfomycin as both intermittent 8 g q8h and continuous infusion 1 g/h with a loading dose of 8 g in a crossover study design. Dense sampling was conducted during both regimens. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate the Probability of Target Attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens using bactericidal (AUC_24h/MIC of 83 and 75%T_>MIC) and bacteriostatic (AUC_24h/MIC of 25) plasma targets and bacteriostatic (AUC_24h/MIC of 3994) urine target.

RESULTS

A total of 176 plasma and 86 urine samples were available for PK analysis. A two-compartment model with a urine compartment best described the data. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) showed a significant correlation with renal clearance and was implemented in the final model. Simulation results show that the dose of 4 g q8h reached 100% of PTA using bactericidal and bacteriostatic targets for MIC up to 16 mg/L.

CONCLUSION

For the clinical breakpoint of 32 mg/L, the standard dosing regimen (4 g q8h) might not be sufficient to reach the bactericidal target. Higher dosing of 8 g q8h as an intermittent infusion or 0.75 g/h as a continuous infusion might be required. Continuous infusion resulted in better attainment of the %T_>MIC target than intermittent infusion.

The Combination of Daptomycin with Fosfomycin is More Effective than Daptomycin Alone in Reducing Mortality of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

High-dose daptomycin-based combinations are recommended for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection (BSI). Preclinical data have shown a synergistic effect of daptomycin/fosfomycin combinations against VRE. However, clinical studies comparing daptomycin monotherapy with daptomycin/fosfomycin combinations are unavailable.

METHODS

An observational study of VRE-BSI was performed between 2010-2021 on patients receiving daptomycin monotherapy (≥ 8 mg/kg) or daptomycin combined with intravenous fosfomycin. Patients treated with concomitant β-lactam combinations were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) analyses.

RESULTS

Among 224 patients, 176 received daptomycin monotherapy, and 48 received fosfomycin combinations. The median daptomycin and fosfomycin doses were 9.8 mg/kg and 12 g/day, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 77.3% and 47.9% in the daptomycin monotherapy and fosfomycin combination groups (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis predicted lower mortality with fosfomycin combination treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.73; P = 0.005). AIPW demonstrated a 17.8% reduced mortality with fosfomycin combinations (95% CI, - 30.6- - 4.9%; P = 0.007). The survival benefit was significant, especially among patients with a lower Pitt bacteremia score or fosfomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 64 mg/l. Fosfomycin combination resulted in higher hypernatremia (10.4% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.04) and hypokalemia (33.3% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.009) compared to daptomycin monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of high-dose daptomycin with fosfomycin improved the survival rate of patients with VRE-BSI compared to daptomycin alone. The benefit of the combination was most pronounced for VRE with fosfomycin MIC ≤ 64 mg/l and for patients with a low Pitt bacteremia score.

Role of peptidoglycan recycling enzymes AmpD and AnmK in Acinetobacter baumannii virulence features

Acinetobacter baumannii is an important causative agent of hospital acquired infections. In addition to acquired resistance to many currently-available antibiotics, it is intrinsically resistant to fosfomycin. It has previously been shown that AmpD and AnmK contribute to intrinsic fosfomycin resistance in A. baumannii due to their involvement in the peptidoglycan recycling pathway. However, the role that these two enzymes play in the fitness and virulence of A. baumannii has not been studied. The aim of this study was to characterize several virulence-related phenotypic traits in A. baumannii mutants lacking AmpD and AnmK. Specifically, cell morphology, peptidoglycan thickness, membrane permeability, growth under iron-limiting conditions, fitness, resistance to disinfectants and antimicrobial agents, twitching motility and biofilm formation of the mutant strains A. baumannii ATCC 17978 ΔampD::Kan and ΔanmK::Kan were compared to the wild type strain. Our results demonstrate that bacterial growth and fitness of both mutants were compromised, especially in the ΔampD::Kan mutant. In addition, biofilm formation was decreased by up to 69%, whereas twitching movement was reduced by about 80% in both mutants. These results demonstrate that, in addition to increased susceptibility to fosfomycin, alteration of the peptidoglycan recycling pathway affects multiple aspects related to virulence. Inhibition of these enzymes could be explored as a strategy to develop novel treatments for A. baumannii in the future. Furthermore, this study establishes a link between intrinsic fosfomycin resistance mechanisms and bacterial fitness and virulence traits.

Evaluation of Fosfomycin-Sulbactam Combination Therapy against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates in a Hollow-Fibre Infection Model

Static concentration in vitro studies have demonstrated that fosfomycin- or sulbactam-based combinations may be efficacious against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the bacterial killing and resistance suppression potential of fosfomycin-sulbactam combination therapies against CRAB isolates in a dynamic infection model. We simulated clinically relevant dosing regimens of fosfomycin (8 g every 8 h, 1 h infusion) and sulbactam (12 g continuous infusion or 4 g every 8 h, 4 h infusion) alone and in combination for 7 days in a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) against three clinical isolates of CRAB. The simulated pharmacokinetic profiles in the HFIM were based on fosfomycin and sulbactam data from critically ill patients. Fosfomycin monotherapy resulted in limited bacterial killing. Sulbactam monotherapies resulted in ~ 3 to 4 log10 kill within the first 8 to 32 h followed by regrowth of up to 8 to 10 log10 CFU/mL. A combination of fosfomycin and continuous infusion of sulbactam led to a ~2 to 4 log10 reduction in bacterial burden within the first 24 h, which was sustained throughout the duration of the experiments. A combination of fosfomycin and extended infusion of sulbactam produced a ~4 log10 reduction in colony count within 24 h. This study demonstrated that fosfomycin in combination with sulbactam is a promising option for the treatment of MDR A. baumannii. Further studies are needed to further assess the potential clinical utility of this combination.

Efficacy of Fosfomycin against Planktonic and Biofilm-Associated MDR Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are a severe public health problem and are caused mainly by the uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC). Antimicrobial resistance and limited development of new antimicrobials have led to the reuse of old antibiotics such as fosfomycin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of fosfomycin on a collection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) UPEC and the degradative activity on biofilm producers. A total of 100 MDR UPEC clinical isolates were collected from patients at Mexican second- and third-level hospitals. Microorganism identification was performed using an automated system, the evaluation of the susceptibility of clinical isolates to fosfomycin was performed using the resazurin microtiter assay, and the identification of biofilm producers and the effect of fosfomycin in biofilms were evaluated using the crystal violet method. Among planktonic MDR UPEC, 93% were susceptible to fosfomycin. Eighty-three MDR UPEC were categorized as weak (39.8%), moderate (45.2%), and strong (14.5%) biofilm producers. Fosfomycin exhibited degradative activity ranging from 164.4 µg/mL to 1,045 µg/mL. Weak producers required statistically lower concentrations of fosfomycin to destroy the biofilm, contrary to moderate and strong producers. In conclusion, fosfomycin could be an option for the treatment of infections caused by MDR UPEC, for which the antimicrobial treatment is more often becoming limited.

Randomised controlled trial of fosfomycin in neonatal sepsis: pharmacokinetics and safety in relation to sodium overload

OBJECTIVE

To assess pharmacokinetics and changes to sodium levels in addition to adverse events (AEs) associated with fosfomycin among neonates with clinical sepsis.

DESIGN

A single-centre open-label randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Kilifi County Hospital, Kenya.

PATIENTS

120 neonates aged ≤28 days admitted being treated with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics for sepsis: ampicillin and gentamicin between March 2018 and February 2019.

INTERVENTION

We randomly assigned half the participants to receive additional intravenous then oral fosfomycin at 100 mg/kg two times per day for up to 7 days (SOC-F) and followed up for 28 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Serum sodium, AEs and fosfomycin pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

61 and 59 infants aged 0-23 days were assigned to SOC-F and SOC, respectively. There was no evidence of impact of fosfomycin on serum sodium or gastrointestinal side effects. We observed 35 AEs among 25 SOC-F participants and 50 AEs among 34 SOC participants during 1560 and 1565 infant-days observation, respectively (2.2 vs 3.2 events/100 infant-days; incidence rate difference -0.95 events/100 infant-days (95% CI -2.1 to 0.20)). Four SOC-F and 3 SOC participants died. From 238 pharmacokinetic samples, modelling suggests an intravenous dose of 150 mg/kg two times per day is required for pharmacodynamic target attainment in most children, reduced to 100 mg/kg two times per day in neonates aged <7 days or weighing <1500 g.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Fosfomycin offers potential as an affordable regimen with a simple dosing schedule for neonatal sepsis. Further research on its safety is needed in larger cohorts of hospitalised neonates, including very preterm neonates or those critically ill. Resistance suppression would only be achieved for the most sensitive of organisms so fosfomycin is recommended to be used in combination with another antimicrobial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03453177.

Fosfomycin Vs Ciprofloxacin as Oral Step-Down Treatment for Escherichia coli Febrile Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the noninferiority of fosfomycin compared to ciprofloxacin as an oral step-down treatment for Escherichia coli febrile urinary tract infections (fUTIs) in women.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in 15 Dutch hospitals. Adult women who were receiving 2-5 days of empirical intravenous antimicrobials for E. coli fUTI were assigned to step-down treatment with once-daily 3g fosfomycin or twice-daily 0.5g ciprofloxacin for 10 days of total antibiotic treatment. For the primary end point, clinical cure at days 6-10 post-end of treatment (PET), a noninferiority margin of 10% was chosen. The trial was registered on Trialregister.nl (NTR6449).

RESULTS

After enrollment of 97 patients between 2017 and 2020, the trial ended prematurely because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The primary end point was met in 36 of 48 patients (75.0%) assigned to fosfomycin and 30 of 46 patients (65.2%) assigned to ciprofloxacin (risk difference [RD], 9.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.8% to 28.0%). In patients assigned to fosfomycin and ciprofloxacin, microbiological cure at days 6-10 PET occurred in 29 of 37 (78.4%) and 33 of 35 (94.3%; RD, -16.2%; 95% CI: -32.7 to -0.0%). Any gastrointestinal adverse event was reported in 25 of 48 (52.1%) and 14 of 46 (30.4%) patients (RD, 20.8%; 95% CI: 1.6% to 40.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosfomycin is noninferior to ciprofloxacin as oral step-down treatment for fUTI caused by E. coli in women. Fosfomycin use is associated with more gastrointestinal events.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial NL6275 (NTR6449).

Analysis of Adverse Reactions of Aspirin in Prophylaxis Medication Based on FAERS Database

Objective

As the most commonly used drug in the world, aspirin has shown benefits for myocardial infarction, stroke, and vascular death in many secondary prevention trials and their meta-analysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between aspirin and its adverse reactions as a preventive drug using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Methods

The FAERS database was queried for the adverse drug events (ADE) reported from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2021. We counted and trended reports to FAERS in which aspirin was associated with anaphylaxis or anaphylaxis followed by death.

Results

The search retrieved 858 aspirin-associated cases within the reporting period; 108 AE pairs with significant disproportionality were retained. The top 10 AE pairs associated with using aspirin for prophylaxis were melaena, duodenal ulcer, gastritis erosive, gastric ulcer hemorrhage, etc. The top 10 AE pairs for thrombosis prophylaxis were melaena, duodenal ulcer, microcytic anemia, lip erosion, vascular stent thrombosis, etc. The screened adverse event reports are classified and counted according to the system organ class (SOC); it mainly focuses on gastrointestinal disorders, general disorders, and administration site conditions. Among the 858 cases of aspirin used as prophylaxis medication in the FAERS database, the reporting areas were mainly in Europe and the Americas.

Conclusion

Adverse drug reactions may occur in the clinical use of aspirin. It should strengthen patient medication education, pay close attention to adverse reactions, and adjust the administration method in time to ensure the safety of medication.

Hypernatremia During Intravenous Treatment With Fosfomycin: A Retrospective Medical Record Review Study and an Analysis of Spontaneous Reports in the EudraVigilance Database

Background: Hypernatremia is a serious event that can occur during intravenous (IV) treatment with fosfomycin, and it can also be caused by a wrong drug preparation. Considering the clinical significance of hypernatremia, we decided to carry out two studies by using two different data sources with the aim to evaluate cases of IV fosfomycin-induced hypernatremia.

Methods: A retrospective medical record review was performed from June 2017 to June 2019 using data from two hospitals in Southern Italy. The information collected was related to the patients, the antibiotic treatment regimen, type of adverse drug reaction (ADR), hypernatremia severity classification, and drug withdrawal due to ADRs. Moreover, a pharmacovigilance study was performed from the date of the European marketing authorization of fosfomycin to October 11, 2021, using data reported on the European website of suspected ADRs. Information related to the patient characteristics, treatment, hypernatremia, and type of reporter was retrieved.

Results: From the retrospective medical record review, a total of 62 patients (48 men and 14 women) in treatment with fosfomycin were identified, of which 17 experienced ADRs. Specifically, 11 patients experienced hypernatremia. During the period from June 2017 to June 2018, a total of 63.7% of hypernatremia events were related to the wrong reconstitution of the drug. According to these results, a surveillance and training campaign about the correct drug reconstitution was managed. However, from June 2018 to June 2019, we still had four new hypernatremia cases. Drug withdrawal occurred in only one patient with hypernatremia. From the pharmacovigilance study, a total of 25 cases of IV fosfomycin-induced hypernatremia were retrieved. No substantial difference was found for patients’ distribution by sex. Most cases were classified as serious (68%) and reported “Recovered/resolved” as the outcome (44%). In the majority of cases, fosfomycin was the only suspected drug reported (72%).

Conclusion: Our results show that training campaigns on the correct drug preparation need to be strengthened to allow a reduction of hypernatremia cases. Moreover, when close monitoring and management is performed by the infectious disease (ID) specialist and hospital pharmacist, there also is a reduction in antibiotic withdrawal due to hypernatremia.

Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid Plus Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model

The optimal therapy for severe infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) remains unclear, but the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin may be a good choice. The 24-h static-concentration time-kill study (SCTK) was used to preliminarily explore the pharmacodynamics of linezolid combined with fosfomycin against three clinical isolates. Subsequently, a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) was used for the first time to further investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of the co-administration regimen against selected isolates over 72 h. To further quantify the relationship between fosfomycin resistance and bacterial virulence in VREfm, the Galleria mellonella infection model and virulence genes expression experiments were also performed. The results of SCTK showed that the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin had additive effect on all strains. In the HFIM, the dosage regimen of linezolid (12 mg/L, steady-state concentration) combined with fosfomycin (8 g administered intravenously every 8 h as a 1 h infusion) not only produced a sustained bactericidal effect of 3∼4 log₁₀ CFU/mL over 72 h, but also completely eradicated the resistant subpopulations. The expression of virulence genes was down-regulated to at least 0.222-fold in fosfomycin-resistant strains compared with baseline isolate, while survival rates of G. mellonella was increased (G. mellonella survival ≥45% at 72 h). For severe infections caused by VREfm, neither linezolid nor fosfomycin monotherapy regimens inhibited amplification of the resistant subpopulations, and the development of fosfomycin resistance was at the expense of the virulence of VREfm. The combination of linezolid with fosfomycin produced a sustained bactericidal effect and completely eradicated the resistant subpopulations. Linezolid plus Fosfomycin is a promising combination for therapy of severe infections caused by VREfm.

Potential Antibiotics for the Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

Neonatal sepsis causes up to an estimated 680,000 deaths annually worldwide, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A significant and growing proportion of bacteria causing neonatal sepsis are resistant to multiple antibiotics, including the World Health Organization-recommended empiric neonatal sepsis regimen of ampicillin/gentamicin. The Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership is aiming to develop alternative empiric antibiotic regimens that fulfil several criteria: (1) affordable in LMIC settings; (2) activity against neonatal bacterial pathogens, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers, gentamicin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA); (3) a licence for neonatal use or extensive experience of use in neonates; and (4) minimal toxicities. In this review, we identify five antibiotics that fulfil these criteria: amikacin, tobramycin, fosfomycin, flomoxef, and cefepime. We describe the available characteristics of each in terms of mechanism of action, resistance mechanisms, clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicity profile. We also identify some knowledge gaps: (1) the neonatal pharmacokinetics of cefepime is reliant on relatively small and limited datasets, and the pharmacokinetics of flomoxef are also reliant on data from a limited demographic range and (2) for all reviewed agents, the pharmacodynamic index and target has not been definitively established for both bactericidal effect and emergence of resistance, with many assumed to have an identical index/target to similar class molecules. These five agents have the potential to be used in novel combination empiric regimens for neonatal sepsis. However, the data gaps need addressing by pharmacokinetic trials and pharmacodynamic characterisation.

Fosfomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in real-life: development and validation of a LC-MS/MS method on plasma samples

Individualization of fosfomycin dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of plasma concentrations could reduce drug-related adverse events and improve clinical outcome in complex clinical conditions. Quantification of fosfomycin in plasma samples was performed by a rapid ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method. Sample preparation involved protein precipitation with [¹³C₃]-fosfomycin benzylamine salt as internal standard. The calibration curve ranged from 2 to 800 mg/L. Within- and between-day precision and accuracy, sensitivity, selectivity, dilution integrity, recovery were investigated and the results met the acceptance criteria. In patients, multiple drug dosing (every 6 or 8 hours) or in continuous administration were adopted, resulting in a large interpatient variability in drug concentrations (from 7.4 mg/L and 644.6 mg/L; CV: 91.1%). In critical care patient setting TDM can represent an important tool to identify the best fosfomycin dosing in single patients, taking into consideration clinical characteristics, infection sites and susceptibility of the treated pathogens.

Amikacin Combined with Fosfomycin for Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis in the Setting of Highly Prevalent Antimicrobial Resistance

Antimicrobial resistance (particularly through extended-spectrum β-lactamase and aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme production) in neonatal sepsis is a global problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, with significant mortality rates. High rates of resistance are reported for the current WHO-recommended first-line antibiotic regimen for neonatal sepsis, i.e., ampicillin and gentamicin. We assessed the utility of fosfomycin and amikacin as a potential alternative regimen to be used in settings of increasingly prevalent antimicrobial resistance. The combination was studied in a 16-arm dose-ranged hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) experiment. The combination of amikacin and fosfomycin enhanced bactericidal activity and prevented the emergence of resistance, compared to monotherapy with either antibiotic. Modeling of the experimental quantitative outputs and data from checkerboard assays indicated synergy. We further assessed the combination regimen at clinically relevant doses in the HFIM with nine Enterobacterales strains with high fosfomycin and amikacin MICs and demonstrated successful kill to sterilization for 6/9 strains. From these data, we propose a novel combination breakpoint threshold for microbiological success for this antimicrobial combination against Enterobacterales strains, i.e., MIC_F × MIC_A < 256 (where MIC_F and MIC_A are the fosfomycin and amikacin MICs, respectively). Monte Carlo simulations predict that a standard fosfomycin-amikacin neonatal regimen would achieve >99% probability of pharmacodynamic success for strains with MICs below this threshold. We conclude that the combination of fosfomycin with amikacin is a viable regimen for the empirical treatment of neonatal sepsis and is suitable for further clinical assessment in a randomized controlled trial.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Fosfomycin after Continuous Infusion Compared with Intermittent Infusion: a Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers

Continuous infusion (CON) of fosfomycin has been proposed as potentially advantageous in certain clinical scenarios. However, no clinical data on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of fosfomycin after CON are available to date. This study aimed to investigate the PK of fosfomycin after CON and compare it with intermittent infusion (INT) of fosfomycin. A randomized two-way crossover study including 8 healthy male volunteers was performed. Each subject received fosfomycin as INT of 8 g over 30 min every 8 h and, separated by a washout period, as CON of 1 g/h preceded by a loading dose of 8 g over 30 min. PK sampling was performed for 18 and 24 h in the CON and INT groups, respectively. Fosfomycin was generally well tolerated. However, 2 out of 8 subjects (25%) developed thrombophlebitis at the infusion site following CON, which was prevented in the following subjects with a simultaneous coinfusion of Ringer's lactate. The steady-state maximum concentration of drug in serum (C _max) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUC_SS,0-24) of fosfomycin after INT were 551.5 ± 67.8 mg/liter and 3,678.5 ± 601.9 h · mg/liter, respectively. CON led to an average steady-state concentration of 183.8 ± 35.9 mg/liter, resulting in a calculated AUC_SS,0-24 of 4,411.2 ± 862.4 h · mg/liter, which was 1.2-fold higher than that with INT. CON resulted in a 100% T _>MIC (time during which the drug concentration exceeds the MIC) for MICs of ≤128 mg/liter, whereas the %T _>MIC for INT was only 44% for an MIC of 128 mg/liter. CON of fosfomycin led to improved PK and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) determinants in plasma of healthy volunteers. The clinical relevance of these findings remains to be investigated in patients.

Emerging Causes of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: A Review of Anaphylaxis-Associated Reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced anaphylaxis is a well-known adverse drug reaction for some drug classes, but emerging drug causes of anaphylaxis and novel mechanisms may contribute in unrecognized ways.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the top drugs reported in association with anaphylaxis and anaphylaxis followed by death in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

We reviewed the publicly available FAERS database from 1999 to 2019. Using search terms "anaphylactic shock" or "anaphylactic reaction" and sorting cases by generic drug names, we counted and trended reports to FAERS in which a drug was associated with anaphylaxis or anaphylaxis followed by death.

RESULTS

From 1999 to 2019, there were 17,506,002 adverse drug events reported in FAERS, of which 47,496 (0.27%) were reported as anaphylaxis. Excluding patients without age, sex, or country data, respectively, the median age of patients in reports of anaphylaxis was 52 (interquartile range: 28), 62.71% were female, and 13,899 of 34,381 (40.43%) reports were from the United States. There were 2984 of 47,496 (6.28%) reports of anaphylaxis followed by death. Top drug classes associated with anaphylaxis in FAERS were antibiotics, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen. Top drug classes associated with anaphylaxis deaths were antibiotics, radiocontrast agents, and intraoperative agents. Linear regression demonstrated reports of anaphylaxis to mAbs increasing at an average rate of 0.77% of total anaphylaxis reports per year (95% confidence interval: 0.65, 0.88) from 2.00% in 1999 to 17.37% in 2019, faster than any other drug class.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotics were highly reported for anaphylaxis overall and anaphylaxis followed by death. Increasing reports were noted for anaphylaxis to mAb therapies.

[Not Available]

Objectif

Rassembler l’information sur les effets indésirables des antibiotiques, que pourront utiliser les médecins prescripteurs comme référence et ressource d’apprentissage.

Qualité des données

Une recherche a été effectuée dans les sites web de diverses agences nationales indépendantes et dans de récentes revues de synthèse. Un tableau résume les effets indésirables de chaque groupe d’antimicrobiens et en indique les allergies, les effets nocifs à court terme et les effets nocifs graves. La fréquence de chaque effet indésirable apparaît au tableau lorsque disponible.

Message principal

Les antimicrobiens sont nécessaires pour traiter diverses maladies. Ils causent cependant des effets indésirables, tels que des réactions allergiques, en plus d’augmenter la résistance bactérienne. Nous sommes de plus en plus conscients du besoin de détecter et d’évaluer les effets indésirables associés aux médicaments. Des effets nocifs graves ont récemment été associés à des antibiotiques couramment utilisés. Ainsi, nous avons résumé, dans le présent article, les connaissances actuelles en matière d’effets nocifs liés aux antibiotiques oraux à action générale qui sont régulièrement utilisés en pratique familiale.

Conclusion

Il est difficile d’identifier et d’attribuer les probabilités exactes de la plupart des effets nocifs. Cependant, tous les antimicrobiens courants produisent des effets nocifs dont il faut tenir compte lors de la décision de prescrire. Nombreux sont les effets indésirables qui ne sont pas reconnus par les prescripteurs. Puisque les effets indésirables sont inévitables, les antimicrobiens doivent être prescrits pour la durée la plus brève possible, seulement lorsque la probabilité d’un bienfait surpasse le risque d’effets nocifs.

Update on the adverse effects of antimicrobial therapies in community practice

OBJECTIVE

To gather information about antibiotic side effects to be used as a reference and learning resource for prescribing physicians.

QUALITY OF EVIDENCE

A search of websites of various independent national agencies and recent review articles was performed. A summary table of adverse effects for each group of antimicrobials was then created, identifying allergies, short-term harms, and serious harms. The occurrence rate of each was listed when available.

MAIN MESSAGE

Antimicrobials are necessary to treat various diseases. However, they cause adverse effects, such as allergic reactions, in addition to increased bacterial resistance. There is increasing awareness of the need to detect and evaluate adverse effects associated with medicines. Recently, severe and serious harms have been described for commonly used antibiotics. Therefore, current knowledge of harms from systemic oral antibiotics that are regularly used in family medicine is summarized in this article.

CONCLUSION

It is difficult to identify and ascribe exact probabilities of most harms. However, all common antimicrobials create harms that must be considered when choosing whether to prescribe. Many adverse effects go unrecognized by prescribers. As side effects are inevitable, antimicrobials must be prescribed for as short a course as possible, only when the probability of benefit is greater than the risk of harm.

Optimal Management of Complicated Infections in the Pediatric Patient: The Role and Utility of Ceftazidime/Avibactam

Antimicrobial resistance poses a substantial threat to global public health. The pursuit of new antibiotics has decreased and very few options have been investigated for the treatment of complicated multidrug-resistant Gram-negative (MDR-GN) infections in adult population and even less in pediatric patients. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) combination with broad antibacterial spectrum. The aim of this review is to describe the current and future role CAZ-AVI in the pediatric population with suspected or confirmed MDR-GN infections.

Potential of fosfomycin in treating multidrug-resistant infections in children

In an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, there are limited treatment options available to treat multidrug-resistant organisms in paediatric patients. Fosfomycin is an antibiotic defined as 'critically important' by The World Health Organization due to its potential efficacy against multidrug-resistant bacteria and is increasingly cited in the international literature as a promising antimicrobial for combating sepsis in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. With broad-spectrum cover that includes both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms and both parenteral and oral formulations available, fosfomycin provides a promising treatment option for paediatric patients. This review summarises fosfomycin's spectrum of activity, published efficacy in paediatric patients, safety considerations and pharmacokinetic data, as well as identifying current clinical trials delineating pharmacokinetic parameters and safety parameters in neonatal sepsis which will provide further information regarding the use of fosfomycin in neonatal and paediatric infections. Limitations regarding the current standards for fosfomycin susceptibility definitions, variations in dosing regimens and the potential mechanisms for resistance are also discussed.

Comparison of single-dose fosfomycin tromethamine and other antibiotics for lower uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women and asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of single-dose fosfomycin tromethamine (FT) versus other antibiotic agents in women suffering from lower uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) and pregnant women with uUTI or asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched to identify relevant literature. Twenty-one studies were identified. Nine of the 21 studies enrolled 21 22 patients and were used to compare the clinical resolution of uUTI between non-pregnant and pregnant women. Given that uUTI and ASB are assessed using similar microbiological evaluation methods, all 3103 patients in the identified 21 studies were pooled to determine microbiological resolution between uUTI or ASB patients. Safety outcomes of the treatments were analysed in 15 studies.

RESULTS

The results showed that single-dose FT was comparable with other antibiotic agents in clinical resolution of uUTI (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.71-1.10; P = 0.41) in non-pregnant (P = 0.32) and pregnant women (P = 0.64). Moreover, single-dose FT was equal to other antibiotics in microbiological resolution, and there was no difference in overall microbiological resolution (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.92-1.34; P = 0.29) among non-pregnant women with uUTI (P = 0.48), pregnant women with uUTI (P = 0.81) and pregnant women with ASB (P = 0.30). There were no serious fosfomycin-related adverse events and most frequent adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that single-dose fosfomycin tromethamine produces equivalent clinical outcomes to comparator antibiotics in terms of clinical efficacy and microbiological efficacy. It is therefore clinically effective and safe for women with uUTI and pregnant women with uUTI or ASB, and has higher patient compliance.

Fosfomycin for Injection (ZTI-01) Versus Piperacillin-tazobactam for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection Including Acute Pyelonephritis: ZEUS, A Phase 2/3 Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) is an epoxide antibiotic with a differentiated mechanism of action (MOA) inhibiting an early step in bacterial cell wall synthesis. ZTI-01 has broad in vitro spectrum of activity, including multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, and is being developed for treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and acute pyelonephritis (AP) in the United States.

METHODS

Hospitalized adults with suspected or microbiologically confirmed cUTI/AP were randomized 1:1 to 6 g ZTI-01 q8h or 4.5 g intravenous (IV) piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ) q8h for a fixed 7-day course (no oral switch); patients with concomitant bacteremia could receive up to 14 days.

RESULTS

Of 465 randomized patients, 233 and 231 were treated with ZTI-01 and PIP-TAZ, respectively. In the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (m-MITT) population, ZTI-01 met the primary objective of noninferiority compared with PIP-TAZ with overall success rates of 64.7% (119/184 patients) vs 54.5% (97/178 patients), respectively; treatment difference was 10.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.4, 20.8). Clinical cure rates at test of cure (TOC, day 19-21) were high and similar between treatments (90.8% [167/184] vs 91.6% [163/178], respectively). In post hoc analysis using unique pathogens typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, overall success rates at TOC in m-MITT were 69.0% (127/184) for ZTI-01 versus 57.3% (102/178) for PIP-TAZ (difference 11.7% 95% CI: 1.3, 22.1). ZTI-01 was well tolerated. Most treatment-emergent adverse events, including hypokalemia and elevated serum aminotransferases, were mild and transient.

CONCLUSIONS

ZTI-01 was effective for treatment of cUTI including AP and offers a new IV therapeutic option with a differentiated MOA for patients with serious Gram-negative infections.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02753946.

Parenteral Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Multidrug Resistant Bacterial Infections: The Rise of the Epoxide

Fosfomycin was initially discovered in 1969 but has recently gained renewed interest for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, particularly in the United States. Its unique mechanism of action, bactericidal activity, broad spectrum of activity, and relatively safe and tolerable adverse effect profile make it a great addition to the dwindling antibiotic armamentarium. Fosfomycin contains a three-membered epoxide ring with a direct carbon to phosphorous bond that bypasses the intermediate oxygen bond commonly present in other organophosphorous compounds; this structure makes the agent unique from other antibiotics. Despite nearly 50 years of parenteral fosfomycin use in Europe, fosfomycin has retained stable activity against most pathogens. Furthermore, fosfomycin demonstrated in vitro synergy in combination with other cell wall-active antibiotics (e.g., β-lactams, daptomycin). These combinations may offer respite for severe infections due to MDR gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The intravenous (IV) formulation is currently under review in the United States, and apropos, this review collates more contemporary evidence (i.e., studies published between 2000 and early 2019) in anticipation of this development. The approval of IV fosfomycin provides another option for consideration in the management of MDR infections. Its unique structure will give rise to a promising epoxide epoch in the battle against MDR bacteria.

Vascular alteration in relation to fosfomycine: In silico and in vivo investigations using a chick embryo model

Fosfomycin residues are found in the egg following administration in the layer hen. In this regard, some aspects of embryo-toxicity of fosfomycin have been documented previously. The exact mechanism by which fosfomycin causes embryo-toxicity is not clearly understood. We hypothesis that fosfomycin may alter vasculature as well as normal expression of genes, which are associated with vascular development. Therefore, the present study aimed to address these issues through in silico and in vivo investigations. At first, embryo-toxicity and anti-angiogenic effects of fosfomycin were tested using computerized programs. After that, fertile chicken eggs were treated with fosfomycin and chorioallantoic membrane vasculature was assessed through morphometric, molecular and histopathological assays. The results showed that fosfomycin not only interacted with VEGF-A protein and promoter, but also altered embryonic vasculature and decreased expression level of VEGF-A. Reticulin staining of treated group was also confirmed decreased vasculature. The minor groove of DNA was the preferential binding site for fosfomycin with its selective binding to GC-rich sequences. We suggested that the affinity of fosfomycin for VEGF-A protein and promoter as well as alteration of the angiogenic signaling pathway may cause vascular damage during embryonic growth. Hence, veterinarians should be aware of such effects and limit the use of this drug during the developmental stages of the embryo, particularly in breeder farms. Considering the anti-angiogenic activity and sequence selectivity of fosfomycin, a major advantage that seems to be very promising is the fact that it is possible to achieve a sequence-selective binding drug for cancer.

Current clinical use of intravenous fosfomycin in ICU patients in two European countries

PURPOSE

In Europe, intravenous fosfomycin (IV) is used particularly in difficult-to-treat or complex infections, caused by both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens including multidrug-resistant strains. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin under real-life conditions.

METHODS

Prospective, multi-center, and non-interventional study in patients with bacterial infections from 20 intensive care units (ICU) in Germany and Austria (NCT01173575).

RESULTS

Overall, 209 patients were included (77 females, 132 males, mean age: 59 ± 16 years), 194 of which were treated in intensive care (APACHE II score at the beginning of fosfomycin therapy: 23 ± 8). Main indications (± bacteremia or sepsis) were infections of the CNS (21.5%), community- (CAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP, 15.3%), bone and joint infections (BJI, 11%), abdominal infections (11%), and bacteremia (10.5%). Most frequently identified pathogens were S. aureus (22.3%), S. epidermidis (14.2%), Enterococcus spp. (10.8%), E. coli (12.3%) and Klebsiella spp. (7.7%). At least one multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen was isolated from 51 patients (24.4%). Fosfomycin was administered with an average daily dose of 13.7 ± 3.5 g over 12.4 ± 8.6 days, almost exclusively (99%) in combination with other antibiotics. The overall clinical success was favorable in 81.3% (148/182) of cases, and in 84.8% (39/46) of patients with ≥ 1 MDR pathogen. Noteworthy, 16.3% (34/209) of patients developed at least one, in the majority of cases non-serious, adverse drug reaction during fosfomycin therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that IV fosfomycin is an effective and safe combination partner for the treatment of a broad spectrum of severe bacterial infections in critically ill patients.

Fosfomycin in antimicrobial stewardship programs

Due to the increase in antimicrobial resistance, strategies such as antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) have been developed to improve the clinical results, decrease the adverse effects and the development of resistances and ensure cost-effective therapies. Fosfomycin has a unique mechanism of action against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Cross-resistance is uncommon; however, fosfomycin should be used in combination in severe infections to avoid selecting resistant mutations. Fosfomycin's oral formulation facilitates sequential treatment, has low toxicity and high tissue penetration, even in the central nervous system and bone. Fosfomycin is active against resistant Gram-positive bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin- resistant enterococci and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, as well as against resistant Gram-negative bacteria such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria. Fosfomycin is therefore useful for cases of persistent bacteremia, skin and soft tissue infections, as a glycopeptide-sparing and carbapenem-sparing drug for healthcare-associated infections and for polymicrobial infections. Published studies have demonstrated the synergy between fosfomycin and beta-lactams, daptomycin and glycopeptides against MSSA and MRSA; with linezolid in biofilm-associated infections and with aminoglycosides and colistin against Gram-negative bacteria, providing a nephroprotective effect.

ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections

Fosfomycin is a bactericidal antibiotic available since the 1970s whose intravenous formulation has been available in many countries outside the USA. Given the rise in drug-resistant bacteria, its introduction into the US market has become a necessity for addressing these organisms. This review provides an overview of the microbiology, clinical pharmacology and initial clinical experiences of the intravenous fosfomycin product (ZTI-01) that is undergoing clinical development in the USA for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis.

Nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin for resistant urinary tract infections: old drugs for emerging problems

Uncomplicated urinary tract infection is one of the most common indications for antibiotic use in the community However the Gram-negative organisms that can cause the infection are becoming more resistant to antibiotics

Many multidrug resistant organisms retain susceptibility to two old antibiotics nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin Advantages over newer drugs include their high urinary concentrations and minimal toxicity

Fosfomycin is a potential treatment option for patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection due to resistant organisms Nitrofurantoin may be more effective and can be used for urinary infections in pregnant women

Antimicrobial resistance and treatment: an unmet clinical safety need

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are burdened by high mortality rates. The development of new compounds to face the global threat of resistance is urgently needed. Combination regimens including "old" high-dose antimicrobials are currently limited by the risk of toxicity, resistance selection, and reduced efficacy. Following the Infectious Diseases Society of America call to develop 10 new antibacterials by 2020, new molecules are currently under development or have become available for use in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

We have reviewed safety characteristics and tolerability of old antimicrobials that are currently employed in combination regimens as well as new antimicrobials, including beta-lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors, new cephalosporins, quinolones, and aminoglycosides.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of new compounds that show in vitro efficacy against MDR represents a unique opportunity to face the threat of resistance and to optimize the current use of antimicrobials, potentially reducing toxicity. Agents that are potentially active against MDR Gram-negatives are ceftozolane/tazobactam, new carbapenems and cephalosporins, the combination of avibactam with ceftazidime, and plazomicin. Further data from clinical trials and post-marketing studies for drugs targeting MDR pathogens are crucial to confirm their efficacy and safety.