Efficacy of Percutaneous Ultrasonic Ablation of Soft Tissue (Tenex) in Tendinopathy and Fasciopathy

Retrospective Evaluation of Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Plantar Fasciotomy With and Without Platelet Rich Plasma

Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common foot conditions presenting to a foot and ankle specialist. Surgical treatment outcomes following plantar fasciotomy vary but short-term studies have reported excellent early pain relief and significant improvements in symptoms. This study evaluates patient reported pain scores collected pre- and post-op for patients who underwent percutaneous ultrasonic microtenotomy (PUT) plantar fasciotomy with PRP injection vs without the use of PRP. We compared pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, for patients treated surgically by Orthopedic Surgery department of foot and ankle faculty members between December 2007 and December 2022. A total of 30 patients were identified that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our results showed that there was a significant decrease in pain VAS scores from pre-op visit (at least 1 month prior to operation) to post-op visit (at least 1 month following operation) for both groups, with a paired t test (p value <.0001). However, patients who received PRP had a statistically significant decrease in pain level compared to the group who did not receive PRP. Statistical analysis completed with a 2-sample t test (p-value <.0325). Our results found the mean time between the initial pre-op visit and last post-op follow-up visit was 19 months. The mean for time following surgical intervention was 10 months. The findings of our study suggest that the dual use of PUT and PRP to treat plantar fasciitis, could potentially lead to an improvement in pain reduction and longevity of pain relief.

Percutaneous ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy for treatment of chronic tendinopathy and fasciopathy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the efficacy of percutaneous ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy (PUNT) in the treatment of chronic tendinopathy and fasciopathy.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed with the following search terms: tendinopathy, tenotomy, needling, Tenex, fasciotomy, ultrasound-guided, and percutaneous. Inclusion criteria consisted of original studies evaluating pain or function improvement after PUNT. Meta-analyses investigating standard mean differences were performed to assess the pain and function improvement.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies with 1674 participants (1876 tendons) were enrolled in this article. Of which 29 articles were included in meta-analysis and the remaining 9 articles without enough numeric data were included in descriptive analysis. PUNT significantly alleviated pain with the standard mean difference of 2.5 (95% CI: 2.0-3.0; p < 0.05), 2.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8-2.7; p < 0.05), and 3.6 (95% CI: 2.8-4.5; p < 0.05) points in short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term follow-up intervals, respectively. It was also associated with marked improvement in function with 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1-1.8; p < 0.05), 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.2; p < 0.05), and 2.1 (95% CI: 1.6-2.6; p < 0.05) points, respectively in short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

PUNT improved pain and function at short-term intervals with persistent results on intermediate- and long-term follow-ups. PUNT can be considered an appropriate minimally invasive treatment for chronic tendinopathy with a low rate of complications and failures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tendinopathy and fasciopathy are two common musculoskeletal complaints that can cause prolonged pain and disability. PUNT as a treatment option could improve pain intensity and function.

KEY POINTS

• The best improvement in pain and function was achieved after the first 3 months following PUNT and was continued to the intermediate- and long-term follow-ups. • No significant difference was found between different tenotomy methods in terms of pain and function improvement. • PUNT is a minimally invasive procedure with promising results and low complication rates for treatments of chronic tendinopathy.

The effectiveness of percutaneous ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy compared to alternative treatments for chronic tendinopathy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To compare percutaneous ultrasound-guided needle tenotomy (PUNT) to alternative treatments for chronic tendinopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed with the following combination of keywords: ultrasound-guided, percutaneous, needling, tenotomy, Tenex, tendinopathy, and fasciotomy. Original studies comparing PUNT to alternative treatments for chronic tendinopathy were included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

Twelve (n = 12) studies with 481 subjects were included. Two (2/12) articles compared PUNT to surgical tenotomy and concluded that PUNT provides the same outcomes as surgical tenotomy. Six (6/12) studies compared PUNT to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, and two of them found both treatment modalities effective with no significant between-group differences. Three trials claimed that PUNT followed by PRP injections showed superior clinical outcomes compared to PUNT alone. However, the difference at long-term follow-up was statistically significant only in one of them. One study found PUNT superior to PUNT + PRP injection at short-term follow-up, although there were no between-group differences at long-term follow-up. Four (4/12) studies compared PUNT to steroid injection (SI) and showed that SI causes fast (2 weeks) but temporary pain relief, PUNT results in persistent but relatively slower improvement to SI, and the combined procedure has a more rapid and steady reduction in symptoms.

CONCLUSION

PUNT is an effective treatment technique for chronic tendinopathy and should be considered when non-invasive treatments have failed. Effects of PRP and SI are transient and dissipate over time and do not contribute to long-term outcome.

Utility of Percutaneous Ultrasonic Tenotomy for Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Chronic tendinopathy is a challenging problem that can lead to significant disability and limitation in not only athletics but also activities of daily living. While there are many treatment techniques described for this overuse injury, no single modality has been proven superior to all others. With recent advances in medical technology, percutaneous ultrasonic tenotomy (PUT) for tendinosis has gained traction with promising results.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the data published on PUT for treatment of tendinopathy, analyze the outcomes of the procedure, including duration of pain relief and patient-reported outcomes, and assess the rate of complications associated with the procedure.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar.

STUDY SELECTION

The following combination of keywords was entered into the electronic search engines: ultrasonic tenotomy, ultrasound tenotomy, Tenex, and ultrasonic percutaneous tenotomy. The search results were screened for studies relevant to the topic. Only English-language studies were considered for inclusion. Studies consisting of level 4 evidence or higher and those involving human participants were included for more detailed evaluation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were sorted and reviewed. Type of tendinopathy studied, outcome measures, and complications were recorded. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on the data collected.

RESULTS

There were a total of 7 studies that met the inclusion criteria and quality measures-5 studies involving the treatment of elbow tendinopathy and 1 study each involving the management of Achilles tendinopathy and plantar fasciitis. PUT resulted in decreased pain/disability scores and improved functional outcome scores for chronic elbow tendinopathy and plantar fasciitis. Results for Achilles tendinopathy showed modest improvement in the short term, but long-term data are lacking.

CONCLUSION

PUT is a minimally invasive treatment technique that can be considered in patients with tendinopathy refractory to conservative treatment measures. Further higher quality studies are necessary to accurately assess the comparative effectiveness of this treatment modality.