1
|
Otte M, Dauben HP, Ahn J, Gutierrez Ibarluzea I, Drummond M, Simoens S, Kaló Z, Suh DC. Value based healthcare and Health Technology Assessment for emerging market countries: joint efforts to overcome barriers. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024:1-6. [PMID: 39221874 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2398482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This paper summarizes the results from a forum of healthcare experts, academia representatives, and public agency officials from emerging and established market countries on Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Presentations from experts provided insights into current developments and challenges, followed by interactive roundtable discussions. Emerging markets have unique healthcare systems, patient populations, resource constraints and needs. AREAS COVERED Each roundtable explored specific topics including the role of HTA and Real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making, challenges in biosimilar value assessment and incorporating non-price criteria reflecting context-related specifications of emerging markets such as the multifaceted nature of value in healthcare decision-making, emphasizing stakeholder perspectives and system complexities. EXPERT OPINION RWE emerged as important in understanding biosimilar value recognition and decision-making processes, with insights into its applications and challenges. Recommendations were provided for utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in pharmaceutical procurement, particularly for off-patent medicines, underscoring the importance of comprehensive evaluation frameworks and adherence to value-based principles. Overall findings suggest avenues for collaboration between industry, academia, and public agencies to address implementation barriers and promote equitable, efficient, and high-quality healthcare systems in emerging markets through public-private partnerships, joint capacity building and training initiatives, and knowledge transfers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeonghoon Ahn
- Department of Health Convergence, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dong-Churl Suh
- Korea Institute for Pharmaceutical Policy Affairs, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grosso F, Barbiani D, Cavalera C, Volpato E, Pagnini F. Risk factors associated with nocebo effects: A review of reviews. Brain Behav Immun Health 2024; 38:100800. [PMID: 39021437 PMCID: PMC11252084 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This meta-review aims to identify and categorize the risk factors that are associated with nocebo effects. The nocebo effect can exert a negative impact on treatment outcomes and have detrimental outcomes on health. Learning more about its potential predictors and risk factors is a crucial step to mitigating it. Methods Literature review studies about the risk factors for nocebo effects were searched through five databases (PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Embase) and through grey literature. Methodological validity and risk of bias were assessed. We conducted a thematic analysis of the results of the forty-three included reviews. Results We identified nine categories of risk factors: prior expectations and learning; socio-demographic characteristics; personality and individual differences; neurodegenerative conditions; inflammatory conditions; communication of information and patient-physician relationship; drug characteristics; setting; and self-awareness. We also highlighted the main biochemical and neurophysiological mechanisms underlying nocebo effects. Conclusions Nocebo effects arise from expectations of adverse symptoms, particularly when triggered by previous negative experiences. A trusting relationship with the treating physician and clear, tailored treatment instructions can act as protective factors against a nocebo effect. Clinical implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Grosso
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | - Diletta Barbiani
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Cavalera
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Volpato
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pagnini
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mohd Sani N, Aziz Z, Kamarulzaman A. Use of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review of Published Position Statements and Recommendations from Health Organisations and Societies. BioDrugs 2024; 38:405-423. [PMID: 38472644 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00649-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hesitation about using biosimilars still exists among healthcare professionals (HCPs), despite extensive experience with their use. Globally, several health organisations and societies from various specialties have issued biosimilar position statements to guide the use of biosimilars in their specialties. However, it is uncertain how similar or different their positions or recommendations are or whether these positions have evolved with the increased experience and availability of new evidence. OBJECTIVES The study aimed to describe and assess the recommendations of published position statements regarding several aspects of biosimilars across specialties and determine whether these positions have changed with the emergence of new evidence. METHODS We systematically searched for published position statements of biosimilars in online databases and included statements written in English. The search was from the inception of the databases until May 2023. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Only position statements that included recommendations to guide the use of biosimilars in clinical practice and were issued by health organisations and societies, including expert panels, were included. We synthesised recommendations on five aspects: prescribing practice, extrapolation of indication, interchangeability, treatment initiation with biosimilars in biologic-naïve patients, and pharmacovigilance. RESULTS The review included 25 papers involving eight specialties, 16 of which were from European countries, 1 from an international organisation representing 49 countries, and 6 from various countries. The papers were published between 2009 and 2020, with 19 published between 2015 and 2020. Of the five aspects of biosimilars assessed, nearly half (11 of 25) of the papers at the time they were published did not base their positions on a scientific or evidence-based approach. Only 4 of the 25 position papers were identified as revisions of their previous papers. With increasing experience in biosimilars and the emergence of new evidence, about 60% (16 of 25) of the papers contained outdated recommendations, particularly on two aspects. They were extrapolations of indications and interchangeability (including switching). The recommendations for most papers for three other aspects were still appropriate. These were prescribing biosimilars by their brand name and active ingredient, initiating treatment with biosimilars in biologic-naïve patients, and monitoring the long-term safety of biosimilars through pharmacovigilance. For four of the revised papers, their position evolved from opposing indication extrapolation for biosimilars to accepting it, while the position of two papers shifted from not recommending biosimilar switching to permitting the practice. Meanwhile, most papers were against automatic substitution by pharmacists because the evidence for this practice was still limited. CONCLUSIONS Across specialties, the variability among the position statements is seen for extrapolation of indications for biosimilars and interchangeability (including switching). This requires a revision, considering the latest evidence and growing experience with the use of biosimilars in extrapolated indications and with switching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noraisyah Mohd Sani
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- National Pharmaceutical Regulatory Agency, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Zoriah Aziz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- Faculty of Pharmacy, MAHSA University, Jenjarom, Malaysia.
| | - Adeeba Kamarulzaman
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Lembah Pantai, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alnaqbi KA, Al Adhoubi N, Aldallal S, Al Emadi S, Al-Herz A, El Shamy AM, Hannawi S, Omair MA, Saad SA, Kvien TK. Consensus-Based Overarching Principles and Recommendations on the Use of Biosimilars in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in the Gulf Region. BioDrugs 2024; 38:449-463. [PMID: 38402494 PMCID: PMC11055752 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00642-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though biologic agents have significantly improved the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis), high costs, stringent regulations, strict reimbursement criteria, and existing patents have limited patient access to treatments. While being highly similar in quality, safety, and efficacy to biologic reference products, biosimilars can reduce the financial burden and prevent underutilization of medication. OBJECTIVE The objective of this initiative was to develop an evidence-based consensus of overarching principles and recommendations aimed at standardizing the use of biosimilars in treating inflammatory arthritis in the Gulf region. METHODS A task force of practicing rheumatologists, a clinical pharmacist, a health economist, patients, regulators, and payors from across the Gulf region developed recommendations and overarching principles based on the outputs of a systematic literature review conducted to address Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) questions specific to key challenges regarding the use of biosimilars for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis in the region. As the data before 2017 have been previously reviewed in another publication, the current review focused on data published between January 2017 and August 2022 (PROSPERO ID CRD42022364002). Consensus on each statement required a level of agreement of 70% or greater. RESULTS Consensus was reached for five overarching principles and nine recommendations by the task force. The principles emphasize the importance of improving the awareness, understanding, and perception of biosimilars, as well as the need for regulated regional real-world data generation and protocols to make biosimilars a viable and affordable treatment option for all patients. The consensus recommendations advocate the need for shared treatment decisions between rheumatologists and patients when considering biosimilars. They further recommend that confirmation of a biosimilar's efficacy and safety in a single indication is sufficient for extrapolation to other diseases for which the reference product has been approved. Finally, there is a need for pharmacovigilance and national health policies governing the adoption and prescription of biosimilars in clinical practice across the region. CONCLUSIONS These are the first consensus recommendations for the Gulf region based on a systematic literature review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, integrating clinical evidence with clinical expertise to optimize decision making for the use of biosimilars in patients with inflammatory arthritis. They were formulated based on predominantly international data because of the limited regional data and therefore can be generalized to serve as recommendations for healthcare professionals in other parts of the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid A Alnaqbi
- Rheumatology Division, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE.
- Internal Medicine Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE.
| | | | - Sara Aldallal
- Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, UAE
- Emirates Health Economics Society, Dubai, UAE
| | - Samar Al Emadi
- Medicine Department, Rheumatology Division, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Adeeba Al-Herz
- Rheumatology Department, Al-Amiri Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | | | | | - Mohammed A Omair
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sahar A Saad
- King Hamad University Hospital, Busaiteen, Kingdom of Bahrain
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schackmann L, Koster ES, van Dijk L, Vervloet M, Heringa M. Communication skills-based training about medication switch encounters: pharmacy staff and patients' experiences. Int J Clin Pharm 2024; 46:439-450. [PMID: 38231348 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01664-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-medical medication switches can lead to difficult conversations. To support pharmacy staff, a communication training has been developed based on two strategies: 'positive message framing' to emphasize positive elements of the message and 'breaking bad news model' to break the news immediately and address emotions. AIM To assess how patients and trained pharmacy staff experience the application of communication strategies for non-medical medication switch conversations and which are barriers and facilitators for the application. METHOD The Kirkpatrick training evaluation model, level 3 'behavior', including barriers and facilitators and 4 'results' was used. Trained pharmacy staff registered switch conversation characteristics and asked patients to complete a questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews with trained pharmacy staff members were conducted. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and interview data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS Of the 39 trained pharmacy staff members, 21 registered characteristics of 71 conversations and 13 were interviewed; 31 patients completed questionnaires. Level 3: trained pharmacy staff self-reported they applied aspects of the strategies, though indicated this was not yet a standard process. Interviewees indicated signs of increased patient contact and job satisfaction. Time, face-to-face conversations and colleague support were facilitators. Level 4: pharmacy staff members were satisfied with most switch conversations (89%), particularly with addressing emotions (74%). Patients were (very) positive (77%) about the communication, particularly about clear explanations about the switch. CONCLUSION Pharmacy staff's learned behavior includes being able to apply aspects of the strategies. The training results show first signs of better patient-pharmacy staff relationships and increased job satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Schackmann
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Ellen S Koster
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcia Vervloet
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mette Heringa
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Adverse nocebo responses can cause harm to patients and interfere with treatment adherence and effects in both clinic practice and clinical trials. Nocebo responses refer to negative outcomes to active medical treatments in clinical trials or practice that cannot be explained by the treatment's pharmacologic effects. Negative expectancies and nocebo effects are less known than placebo responses. Nocebo effects can be triggered by verbal suggestions, prior negative experiences, observation of others experiencing negative outcomes, and other contextual and environmental factors. As research advances over the years, mechanistic knowledge is accumulating on the neurobiological mechanisms of nocebo effects. This review summarizes studies on different facets of nocebo effects and responses and discusses clinical implications, ethical considerations, and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science and Placebo Beyond Opinions Center, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ruda RC, Kelly KA, Feldman SR. Real-world outcomes following switching from anti-TNF reference products to biosimilars for the treatment of psoriasis. J DERMATOL TREAT 2023; 34:2140569. [PMID: 36305624 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2140569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors improved clinical outcomes for patients with psoriasis but are limited by their high cost. There are several biosimilar options approved for the treatment of psoriasis which provides a lower-cost alternative and the potential to increase treatment availability for both biologically naïve and bioexperienced patients. Numerous phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the effects of switching from biologics to biosimilars; biosimilars had comparable safety and efficacy to their reference products. Real-world evidence may provide complementary information on the expected performance of biosimilars. In this literature review, we analyzed data from real-world studies on switching from biologics for psoriasis to their biosimilars. Effectiveness and safety profiles were comparable when switching from biologics to biosimilars of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab. These studies are limited by their sample sizes, duration of follow-up, and single-arm designs without control groups. Based on available real-world evidence, patients may safely and effectively undergo switching to biosimilar therapies for the treatment of psoriasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Ruda
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Katherine A Kelly
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Steven R Feldman
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wu Q, Wang Z, Wang X, Yu H, Sun J. Patients' Perceptions of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2023; 37:829-841. [PMID: 37676537 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00620-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically summarize and evaluate the findings of existing studies about patients' perceptions of biosimilars by assessing their attitudes and knowledge. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of published studies concerning patients' perceptions of biosimilars, using databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened a total of 2197 Chinese or English papers published between 1 January 2018, and 1 October 2022. We assessed the quality of the included studies by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. RESULTS Forty-three studies were included in the review, with the majority originating from Europe (n = 22) and North America (n = 10). Of these studies, 37 were cross-sectional quantitative studies, three were quasi-experimental studies, and the remaining three were qualitative studies based on semi-structured interviews. The sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 9 to 6554 patients. Twenty-two out of 31 studies investigating patients' acceptance of biosimilars found that most participants expressed satisfaction with treatment using biosimilars. However, doubts about the clinical effects and regulatory approval pathway could negatively influence patients' attitudes. The majority of patients understood the economic advantages of biosimilars; however, some incorrectly connected lower prices with lower quality. Patients generally lacked knowledge about biosimilars. There were 6-51% of participants who were familiar with biosimilars, and 25-58% thought they did not know enough about biosimilars. Physicians, pharmacists, medicines agencies, academia, and patient associations were identified as the main sources of information on biosimilars for patients. Healthcare providers not informing or advising patients about switching may hinder patients from acquiring enough knowledge. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients expressed satisfaction with treatment using biosimilars, but limited knowledge continued to impede their perceptions. Doubts about the clinical effects and regulatory approval pathway were identified as major factors that negatively influenced patients' attitudes towards biosimilars, while the impact of a price advantage was mixed. It is essential to maintain a focus on educating healthcare professionals about biosimilars, including their clinical outcomes and the regulatory pathway, which equips them to provide comprehensive and informed guidance to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyou Wu
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhitao Wang
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Wang
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Yu
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jing Sun
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pauline O, Robert M, Bernardeau C, Hlavaty A, Fusaroli M, Roustit M, Cracowski JL, Khouri C. Assessment of Reported Adverse Events After Interchanging Between TNF-α Inhibitor Biosimilars in the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database. BioDrugs 2023; 37:699-707. [PMID: 37278971 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00603-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Observational studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients interchanging between tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor biosimilars withdraws from the new treatment because of adverse effects. We aim to analyze adverse events related to interchanging from tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitor reference products to biosimilars and between biosimilars reported in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database. METHODS We extracted all cases reporting the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term "Product substitution issue (PT)" for TNF-α inhibitors. Then, we analyzed and categorized all adverse events reported in more than 1% of cases. We compared the adverse events reported according to reporter qualification, type of switch, and type of TNF-α inhibitor using Chi2 tests. We conducted a network analysis coupled with a clustering approach to identify syndromes of co-reported adverse events. RESULTS In the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database, 2543 cases and 6807 adverse events related to TNF-α inhibitor interchangeability have been reported up to October 2022. Injection-site reactions were the most reported adverse events with 940 cases (37.0%), followed by modifications in drug effect in 607 cases (23.9%). Musculoskeletal, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal disorders linked to the underlying disease were reported in 505 (20.0%), 145 (5.7%), and 207 (8.1%) cases, respectively. Adverse events non-related to the underlying disease were nonspecific (n = 458, 18.0%), neurologic (n = 224, 8.8%), respiratory (n = 132, 5.2%), and psychological disorders (n = 64, 2.5%). Injection-site reactions and infection-related symptoms (e.g., nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, lower respiratory tract infection) were more reported by non-healthcare professionals while adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., drug ineffective, arthralgia, psoriasis) were more reported by healthcare professionals. The proportions of injection-site reactions were higher when switching between biosimilars of the same reference product, but the proportions of adverse events related to reduced clinical efficacy (e.g., psoriasis, arthritis, psoriatic arthropathy) were more reported when switching from a reference product. The main differences in the proportions of reported cases between adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept were driven by symptoms related to the underlying targeted diseases, except for a higher reporting rate of injection-site pain with adalimumab. Adverse events evocative of hypersensitivity reactions were reported in 192 (7.6%) cases. Most of the network clusters concerned non-specific adverse events or were related to reduced clinical efficacy. CONCLUSIONS This analysis highlights the burden of patient-reported adverse events when interchanging between TNF-α inhibitor biosimilars, notably injection-site reactions, non-specific adverse events, and symptoms related to reduced clinical efficacy. Our study also highlights differences in reporting patterns between patients and healthcare professionals and depending on the type of switch. The results are limited by missing data, the lack of precision of the coded Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms, and by the variability of reporting rate of adverse events. Thus, incidence rates of adverse events cannot be inferred from these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orhon Pauline
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Marion Robert
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Claire Bernardeau
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Alex Hlavaty
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Michele Fusaroli
- Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matthieu Roustit
- Grenoble Alpes University, HP2 Laboratory, Inserm U1300, Grenoble, France
- Grenoble Alpes University, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CIC1406, Grenoble, France
| | - Jean-Luc Cracowski
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France
- Grenoble Alpes University, HP2 Laboratory, Inserm U1300, Grenoble, France
| | - Charles Khouri
- Pharmacovigilance Unit, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
- Grenoble Alpes University, HP2 Laboratory, Inserm U1300, Grenoble, France.
- Grenoble Alpes University, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CIC1406, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wilson N, Liu J, Adamjee Q, Di Giorgio S, Steer S, Hutton J, Lempp H. Exploring the emotional impact of axial Spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies and a review of social media. BMC Rheumatol 2023; 7:26. [PMID: 37608395 PMCID: PMC10464274 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-023-00351-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The psychological burden in people with inflammatory arthritis is substantial, yet little is known about the disease-related affect experienced by individuals with axial Spondyloarthritis (axial SpA). The aim of this study was to conduct a qualitative evidence synthesis and a review of social media to explore the emotional impact of living with axial SpA. METHODS We searched nine databases for studies reporting qualitative data about participants' emotional experience of living with axial SpA. In addition, we searched social media platforms for posts from people with axial SpA based in the UK that offered insights into emotional responses to living with the condition. We employed a thematic approach to synthesise the data. RESULTS We included 27 studies (1314 participants; 72% men) in our qualitative evidence synthesis and developed seven descriptive themes from the data: 1) delayed diagnosis: a barrier to emotional wellbeing; 2) disruptive symptoms: a source of mood swings; 3) work disability: a loss of self-esteem; 4) obstacles in interpersonal relationships: a trigger of distress; 5) taking up exercise: personal pride or unwelcomed reminders; 6) anti-TNF therapy: hope reignited despite concerns and 7) a journey of acceptance: worry mixed with hope. Posts extracted from social media fora (537; 48% from women) for the most part supported the seven themes. One additional theme-COVID-19, uncertainty and anxiety during the pandemic, was developed, reflecting common emotions expressed during the UK's first wave of the coronavirus pandemic. CONCLUSION This study highlights a preponderance of negative affect experienced by people living with axial SpA, conditioned through existing and anticipated symptoms, failed expectations, and lost sense of self. Given the bidirectional relationships between negative emotions and inflammation, negative emotions and perceptions of pain, and the influence of affect in self-care behaviours, this finding has important implications for treatment and management of people with axial SpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicky Wilson
- Department of Rheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Jia Liu
- Centre for Education, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Qainat Adamjee
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sonya Di Giorgio
- King's College London Libraries & Collections, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sophia Steer
- Department of Rheumatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jane Hutton
- Department of Clinical Health Psychology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Department of Inflammation Biology, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moorkens E, Lacosta TB, Dawoud D, Inotai A, Janodia M, Tan CJ, Lim KK, Khatri N, Pereira CL, Simoens S. A Systematic Literature Review of Gaps and Challenges in Value Assessment of Biosimilars: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1137-1144. [PMID: 37516531 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to provide an overview of the gaps and challenges in the value assessment of biosimilars and to identify potential approaches to address them. METHODS A multidisciplinary, international team of biosimilar experts identified gaps and challenges. A systematic review was conducted of the peer-reviewed literature in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; and of the gray literature. Preliminary results were presented at ISPOR conferences and this article benefited from 2 review rounds among ISPOR Biosimilar Special Interest Group members. RESULTS Given that a biosimilar is highly similar to its reference biologic, health technology assessment agencies should accept the comparability exercise approved by regulatory authorities and, thus, conduct a price comparison when biosimilar reimbursement is requested for the same indication as the reference biologic. If the reference biologic is not reimbursed or is not the standard of care, a full economic evaluation of the biosimilar versus a relevant comparator needs to be conducted. To date, little consideration has been given to specific challenges, such as how biosimilar value assessment can account for the nocebo effect, potential differences between biologic-naive and biologic-experienced patients, the availability of intravenous and subcutaneous administration forms or different administration devices for the same active compound, value-added services, and the contribution of biosimilars for generating health gain at the population level. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to gather further insights in the methodology of value assessment for biosimilars, and health technology assessment agencies need to develop more elaborate guidance on biosimilar value assessment in specific circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien Moorkens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Dalia Dawoud
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, England, UK; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - András Inotai
- Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Manthan Janodia
- Department of Pharmacy Management, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal, India
| | - Chia Jie Tan
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ka Keat Lim
- School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, England, UK; Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - Nishtha Khatri
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vandenplas Y, Simoens S, Van Wilder P, Vulto AG, Huys I. The impact of policy interventions to promote the uptake of biosimilar medicines in Belgium: a nationwide interrupted time series analysis. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:68. [PMID: 37415219 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01015-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Belgian government has taken several measures to increase the uptake of biosimilars in past years. However, no formal evaluation of the impact of these measures has been made yet. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the implemented measures on biosimilar uptake. METHODS An interrupted time series analysis was performed using an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model with the Box-Jenkins method. All data were expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) per month/quarter and obtained from the Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI). Three molecules were included in the analysis: etanercept (ambulatory), filgrastim (hospital), and epoetin (hospital). A significance level of 5% was used for all analyses. RESULTS In the ambulatory care, the effect of a financial prescriber incentive of 2019 was investigated. After this intervention, 44.504 (95% CI -61.61 to -14.812; P < 0.001) fewer etanercept biosimilar DDDs were dispensed monthly than expected in the absence of the intervention. Two interventions were modelled for biosimilars in the hospital setting. The first intervention of 2016 includes prescription targets for biosimilars and monitoring of hospitals on adequate tendering. The second intervention involves an information campaign on biosimilars. After the first intervention, a small decrease in quarterly epoetin biosimilar uptake of 449.820 DDD (95% CI -880.113 to -19.527; P = 0.05) was observed. The second intervention led to a larger increase in quarterly epoetin biosimilar uptake of 2733.692 DDD (95% CI 1648.648-3818.736; P < 0.001). For filgrastim, 1809.833 DDD (95% CI 1354.797-2264.869; P < 0.001) more biosimilars were dispensed immediately after the first intervention and 151.639 DDD (95% CI -203.128 to -100.150; P < 0.001) fewer biosimilars each quarter after the first intervention. An immediate and sustained increase of 700.932 DDD (95% CI 180.536-1221.328; P = 0.016) in quarterly biosimilar volume was observed after the second intervention. All other parameter estimates were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that the impact of past policy interventions to increase the uptake of biosimilars has been variable and limited. A holistic policy framework is required to develop a competitive and sustainable off-patent biologicals market in Belgium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Vandenplas
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philippe Van Wilder
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schackmann L, Heringa M, Wolters M, Faber A, van Dijk L, Koster ES, Vervloet M. Facilitating pharmacy staff's conversations about non-medical medication switches: Development and testing of a communication training. Res Social Adm Pharm 2023; 19:738-745. [PMID: 36740526 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-medical medication switches, a change to another medicine or medication label not motivated by medical reasons, occur frequently. Switches often lead to negative patient emotions, such as confusion and anger. Pharmacy staff's communication, i.e. delivering the message and addressing patients' emotions is crucial, but experienced as difficult. OBJECTIVE To develop and test a communication training for the pharmacy team to facilitate medication switch conversations. METHODS A communication training was developed based on the 'breaking bad news model' and 'positive message framing' strategies, and incorporating needs and preferences from practice. The training consisted of an e-learning with theory and reflective exercises, a half-day live training session, and an online reflection session. The Kirkpatrick training evaluation model (levels one 'reaction' and two 'learning') was used to evaluate the training. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and interview data was transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. RESULTS Twelve pharmacists and 27 pharmacy technicians from 15 Dutch pharmacies participated in the training. According to Kirkpatrick's model level one, the major learning outcome was to give space to patients to express their emotions and/or concerns (e.g. more silences in the conversations). For level two, most participants valued practicing the conversations, role-playing, and receiving feedback. The majority of the participants indicated that they had sufficient tools and practice during the live training to apply the strategies in daily practice. A few participants still needed time and practice, or missed examples to apply the strategies. CONCLUSION The communication training based on the two strategies was well-received and participants felt well-equipped post-training. The take-away for participants was to give space to patients to express their emotions. Using these strategies and skills, pharmacy teams can tailor their medication counseling to patients' emotions and concerns during non-medical medication switches to better support patients in proper medication use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Schackmann
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Mette Heringa
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Majanne Wolters
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Adrianne Faber
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology & -Economics, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen S Koster
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Marcia Vervloet
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shubow S, Sun Q, Nguyen Phan AL, Hammell DC, Kane M, Lyman GH, Gibofsky A, Lichtenstein GR, Bloomgarden Z, Cross RK, Yim S, Polli JE, Wang YM. Prescriber Perspectives on Biosimilar Adoption and Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology: A Workshop Summary. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 113:37-49. [PMID: 36251545 PMCID: PMC10099086 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The approval and adoption of biosimilar products are essential to contain increasing healthcare costs and provide more affordable choices for patients. Despite steady progress in the number of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) biosimilar approvals over the years, biosimilar adoption in the United States has been slow and gradual, largely driven by payers rather than clinicians. In order to better understand the barriers to biosimilar adoption in the clinic, the University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI) and the FDA jointly hosted a virtual workshop on April 13, 2022, titled "Biosimilars: A Decade of Experience and Future Directions - Strategies for Improving Biosimilar Adoption and the Potential Role of Clinical Pharmacology." This summary documents the experiences of four leading academic clinicians with specialties in oncology, rheumatology, gastroenterology, and endocrinology and their perspectives on how to increase biosimilar adoption, including the role of clinical pharmacology. Besides systemic changes in pricing and reimbursement, there is a need for additional education of a broad range of providers, including advanced care practitioners, and patients themselves. Educational efforts highlighting the rigor of the studies that support the approval of biosimilars-including the clinical pharmacology studies-and the benefits of biosimilars, can play a major role in improving biosimilar acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Shubow
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Qin Sun
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Dana C Hammell
- School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Maureen Kane
- School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Allan Gibofsky
- Division of Rheumatology, Weill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gary R Lichtenstein
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zachary Bloomgarden
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Disease, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Yim
- Office of Therapeutic Biologics and Biosimilars, Office of New Drugs, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - James E Polli
- School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Yow-Ming Wang
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cohen HP, Hachaichi S, Bodenmueller W, Kvien TK, Danese S, Blauvelt A. Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies. BioDrugs 2022; 36:625-637. [PMID: 35881304 PMCID: PMC9485085 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00546-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple switches (transitions) between biosimilars of the same reference biologic are now a reality, and they are expected to become more common in the future as more biosimilars enter the market. Switching between two biosimilars of the same reference biologic is generally driven by affordability, formulary requirements, or the relocation/travel of the patient. Evidence of whether switching between biosimilars of the same reference biologic provides similar safety and efficacy profiles is reviewed here. METHODS A systematic search was undertaken using electronic databases (to December 2021): Biosis, Embase, MEDLINE, and EBM Reviews/Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Ovid. Publications were evaluated for effectiveness and/or safety data linked to switching from one biosimilar to another. RESULTS The systematic search yielded 982 citations. After eliminating duplicates, 626 citations remained for the initial title/abstract screening phase. Following the initial screening, 240 records were chosen; more thorough examination yielded 35 citations. After comprehensive screening and expert advice, 23 studies were selected, of which 13 were published in peer-reviewed journals; the remainder have been published as abstracts. Overall, 3657 patients were included in these studies. All studies were observational in nature; no randomized clinical trials were identified. The studies were heterogeneous in size, design, and endpoints. Across the studies, data are provided on safety, effectiveness, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, patient retention, patient and physician perceptions, and drug-use patterns. The majority of studies examined switches between biosimilar infliximabs, although switches between biosimilar adalimumabs, etanercepts, and rituximabs were also identified. Two use-pattern studies and one case report were also detected and are discussed. CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this systematic review, available data suggests that biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching is a safe and effective clinical practice, although it is not covered by current health authority regulations or guidance. No reduction in effectiveness or increase in adverse events was detected in biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching studies conducted to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hillel P Cohen
- Sandoz Inc. (A Novartis Division), 100 College Road West, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.
| | | | | | - Tore K Kvien
- Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cooksey R, Brophy S, Kennedy J, Seaborne M, Choy E. Real-world use of an etanercept biosimilar including selective versus automatic substitution in inflammatory arthritis patients: a UK-based electronic health records study. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2022; 6:rkac056. [PMID: 35910710 PMCID: PMC9336562 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkac056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Biosimilars are approved as an alternative treatment to their originators. We compared the clinical outcomes of etanercept (ETN) biosimilar compared with ETN originator in real-world practice, from two local health boards in Wales with different policies on switching: automatic vs selective. Methods Data from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank in Wales were used to create a retrospective cohort study using linked primary and secondary care data. Patients aged ≥18 years with diagnosis codes for RA, PsA or AS were included. Outcomes included treatment failure and DAS-28 score (for RA). The local health board with a policy of automatic switching (i.e. clinician/nurse involvement not mandated) is labelled as automatic switch area, and the other, which required clinician/nurse supervision, as selective switch. Results Of 8925 individuals with inflammatory arthritis, 13.3% (365) received ETN biosimilar and 31.5% (863) ETN originator. The treatment discontinuation rate was similar for ETN biosimilar and originator by Kaplan-Meier analysis. More biosimilar failure patients were treated in the automatic switch area (15 vs 4.8%). In the automatic switch area, 28.8% (75 of 260) of patients switched automatically from ETN originator to biosimilar compared with 10.5% (11 of 105) in the selective switch area. ETN biosimilar reduced DAS-28 by 1.6 ± 1.8 in the selective switch area vs 0.4 ± 0.6 in the automatic switch area. Conclusion The ETN biosimilar was well tolerated. Fewer people were switched using selective policy, but this was associated with lower failure rates. Automatic switch policy led to more patients being switched and did not lead to significant worsening of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Cooksey
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| | - Sinead Brophy
- Health Data Research UK, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Jonathan Kennedy
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| | - Michael Seaborne
- Health Data Research UK, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Ernest Choy
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hu Y, Song Z, Jiang D, Zhuo L, Cheng Y, Zhao R. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice of Healthcare Providers, Healthcare Regulatory Practitioners and Patients Toward Biosimilars in China: Insights From a Nationwide Survey. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:876503. [PMID: 35721219 PMCID: PMC9201466 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.876503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: With increasing numbers of biosimilars entering the market or in the approval pipeline in China, understanding the current awareness and attitudes of biosimilars still remains the first step to promote uptake. This study aims to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of multiple stakeholders toward biosimilars, including healthcare providers (HCPs), healthcare regulatory practitioners and patients, and to provide practical information for future uptake of biosimilars in China. Methods: This nationwide cross-sectional online survey was conducted in mainland China. The questionnaire with a high level of reliability and validity was designed based on previous studies and clinical questions in the Clinical Practice Guideline for Clinical Application of Biosimilars. Logistic regression model was employed to identify possible impact factors, and Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to identify the correlation between knowledge and attitudes. Chi-squared test was used to compare the differences between different stakeholders. Results: Overall, 599 valid respondents were recruited, of whom 77.63%, 7.01% and 15.36% were HCPs, healthcare regulatory practitioners and patients, respectively. A total of 504 respondents who had heard of biosimilars were included in the KAP analysis. 76.70% of HCPs, 90.24% of healthcare regulatory practitioners and 50.98% of patients had good knowledge about the definition, while less familiarity with the development process and regulations on interchangeability and indication extrapolation was found in the former two groups. For attitudes toward biosimilars, an overall lack of positivity was shown, as only 18.20% HCPs, 14.63% healthcare regulatory practitioners and 23.53% patients were classified as having positive attitudes. More specifically, most respondents were positive about the influence of payment policy on the uptake of biosimilars, but they showed a neutral attitude toward the clinical medication and interchangeability of biosimilars. Efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, interchangeability and indication extrapolation are major concerns when utilizing biosimilars. Regarding practice, our study showed an inadequate utilization of biosimilars in China. Several further suggestions on the regulation of biosimilars were proposed by healthcare regulatory practitioners. Conclusions: There is still plenty of room for improvement of knowledge, attitudes and practice toward biosimilars among multiple stakeholders in China, which can be improved through high-quality real world evidence, educational programs and other effective measures directed towards barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Hu
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.,Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zaiwei Song
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.,Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Dan Jiang
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.,Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Zhuo
- Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yinchu Cheng
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.,Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Rongsheng Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.,Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Exploring the Reasons Behind the Substantial Discontinuation Rate Among Patients Taking CT-P13 in a Large Tertiary Hospital in Western Switzerland: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Routinely Collected Medical Data. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2022; 9:425-436. [PMID: 35590047 PMCID: PMC9392673 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-022-00299-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CT-P13 is an infliximab biosimilar that was granted market authorization in Switzerland in 2016. Despite the growing literature supporting the equivalence of CT-P13 compared with originator infliximab regarding the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity and the undeniable cost-saving opportunities, CT-P13 remains widely underused in Switzerland. OBJECTIVE Leaving aside the phenomenon of a low initiation rate, this study aimed to explore the reasons behind the high discontinuation rate observed among the patients taking CT-P13 in a large tertiary hospital in Western Switzerland. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data. Patients were eligible if they received originator infliximab or CT-P13 between September 2017 and December 2020. They were included if they had received at least two CT-P13 infusions during the same period. Patients were excluded if the follow-up was incomplete prior to or 6 months after their first CT-P13 infusion and if they had an oncological main diagnosis. Primary outcomes were the reasons for treatment discontinuation. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-six patients were included and classified into two groups: switchers who were treated with originator infliximab and were switched to CT-P13 (n = 85, 54%) and initiators who did not receive originator infliximab prior to CT-P13 treatment (n = 71, 46%). Included patients belonged to three different groups of diagnosis: gastroenterological (67, 43%), rheumatological (61, 39%), and immunological (28, 18%). Twenty-three (27%) switchers and 35 (49%) initiators discontinued CT-P13 after 12 months. Main reasons for CT-P13 discontinuation were lack of efficacy (n = 21, 36%) and secondary loss of response (n = 16, 28%); however, objective assessments were not available. Initiators' probability to discontinue CT-P13 at 12 months was significantly higher than switchers' (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Lack of efficacy and secondary loss of response were the main reasons for the high CT-P13 discontinuation rate observed in a large tertiary hospital in Western Switzerland. Lack of active training and coordination among healthcare professionals and little education in patients may have exacerbated patients' subjective complaints and increased the CT-P13 discontinuation rate.
Collapse
|
19
|
Conran CA, Moreland LW. A review of biosimilars for rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2022; 64:102234. [PMID: 35552095 DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2022.102234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Biologics are effective, though costly, medications for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Biosimilars are medications that have no clinically meaningful differences when compared with their corresponding reference biologics but cost significantly less. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medication Agency have approved biosimilars for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and rituximab for the treatment of RA. Streamlined approval processes are expected to expedite biosimilar development while maintaining strict safety and efficacy standards. Encouragingly, many analyses have demonstrated the potential for massive healthcare savings if biosimilars are used over biologics. Challenges to biosimilar uptake, including patient and provider hesitancy, can likely be overcome with the education of all stakeholders within healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly A Conran
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Larry W Moreland
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Colorado Denver - Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schreiber S, Puig L, Gonçalves J, Mease PJ, Panaccione R, Emery P. Critical Appraisal and Future Outlook on Anti-Inflammatory Biosimilar Use in Chronic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2022; 55:152023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
21
|
Hariprasad SM, Gale RP, Weng CY, Ebbers HC, Rezk MF, Tadayoni R. An Introduction to Biosimilars for the Treatment of Retinal Diseases: A Narrative Review. Ophthalmol Ther 2022; 11:959-982. [PMID: 35278204 PMCID: PMC9114261 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-022-00488-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of disease across a number of therapeutic areas including retinal diseases. However, on occasion, such treatments may be relatively more expensive compared to small molecule therapies. This can restrict patient access and treatment length leading to suboptimal clinical outcomes. Several biosimilar candidates of ranibizumab and aflibercept are currently in development and the first biosimilar of ranibizumab received EMA approval in August and FDA approval in September 2021. Biosimilars are biological medicines that are highly similar to an already-approved biological medicine (reference product). The physicochemical and clinical similarity of a biosimilar is determined by a rigorous analytical and clinical program, including extensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis with phase III equivalence studies where appropriate. These phase III studies are carried out in a patient population that is representative of all of the potential approved therapeutic indications of the originator product and the most sensitive for detecting potential differences between the biosimilar and the reference product. Biosimilars have been used successfully across a wide range of therapeutic areas for the past 15 years where they have achieved substantial cost savings that can be reinvested into healthcare systems without affecting the quality of patient care. The current review provides an introduction to biosimilars with the aim of preparing retinal specialists for discussing these products with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seenu M Hariprasad
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Richard P Gale
- Department of Ophthalmology, York Teaching Hospital, University of York, York, UK
| | - Christina Y Weng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Ramin Tadayoni
- Université de Paris, AP-HP, Lariboisière, Saint Louis and Fondation Adolphe de Rothschild Hospitals, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vandenplas Y, Barbier L, Simoens S, Van Wilder P, Vulto AG, Huys I. Perceptions About Biosimilar Medicines Among Belgian Patients in the Ambulatory Care. Front Pharmacol 2022; 12:789640. [PMID: 35069205 PMCID: PMC8766979 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.789640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: Biosimilar medicines have been on the European market for 15 years. Despite the extensive and positive experience with biosimilars across Europe, their uptake remains limited in Belgium. One of the possible factors limiting uptake in clinical practice is the inadequate understanding and lack of trust in biosimilars among patients. This study aimed to assess the level of knowledge and perceptions about biosimilar medicines among Belgian patients in the ambulatory care. Methods: This study consisted of online questionnaires among Belgian patients in the ambulatory care (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, plaque psoriasis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, diabetes mellitus type I and II). The results were collected between December 2020 and February 2021. The data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: In total, 657 patients across all disease areas of interest participated in this study. Only 38% of patients had heard of biosimilars before. Of those patients, most (58%) were aware that biosimilars are as safe and effective as their reference product. The vast majority of respondents (68%) would agree with transitioning to a biosimilar if their physician prescribed it, only 3% would never agree with a transition to a biosimilar. If a physician would propose to change their current originator biological therapy with its biosimilar, nearly all patients (95%) want their physician to explain the decision and inform them. For additional information about biosimilars, Belgian patients prefer brochures or folders (41%), or available resources on the internet (35%). Physicians were indicated as the preferred source of information (95%), followed by pharmacists (51%), academia (39%), and patient associations (35%). Most patients require information regarding the safety and efficacy (78%), price and reimbursement (64%), and the clinical development process (56%) of the biosimilar. Conclusion: Belgian patients require information about biosimilar medicines. However, most patients are open and positive towards transitioning their current biological therapy with its biosimilar if sufficiently supported by their healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Vandenplas
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liese Barbier
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philippe Van Wilder
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnold G. Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Baraliakos X, Tsiami S, Vijayan S, Jung H, Barkham N. Real-world evidence for subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13 SC) treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A case series. Clin Case Rep 2022; 10:e05205. [PMID: 35079380 PMCID: PMC8777045 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the benefits of subcutaneous (SC) administration for healthcare systems. The first SC infliximab, CT-P13 SC, was safe and effective for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Observed patient preferences for continuing CT-P13 SC suggest that patients receiving IV infliximab should be offered a switch to CT-P13 SC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sooraj Vijayan
- Department of RheumatologyNew Cross HospitalRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustWolverhamptonUK
- SUT Academy of Medical SciencesThiruvananthapuramIndia
| | | | - Nick Barkham
- Department of RheumatologyNew Cross HospitalRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustWolverhamptonUK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vijayan S, Hwangbo K, Barkham N. Real-world evidence for subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13 SC) treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A case series. Clin Case Rep 2022; 10:e05233. [PMID: 35059197 PMCID: PMC8757239 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic emphasized the utility of subcutaneous (SC) biologics for pressured healthcare systems. The first SC form of infliximab, CT-P13 SC, provided safe and effective treatment for ankylosing spondylitis in our case series, with increased convenience relative to intravenous treatment benefitting patients both during the pandemic and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sooraj Vijayan
- Department of RheumatologyNew Cross HospitalRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustWolverhamptonUK
- Present address:
SUT Academy of Medical SciencesThiruvananthapuramIndia
| | | | - Nick Barkham
- Department of RheumatologyNew Cross HospitalRoyal Wolverhampton NHS TrustWolverhamptonUK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Meijboom RW, Gardarsdottir H, Egberts TCG, Giezen TJ. Patients Retransitioning from Biosimilar TNFα Inhibitor to the Corresponding Originator After Initial Transitioning to the Biosimilar: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2021; 36:27-39. [PMID: 34870802 PMCID: PMC8847209 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-021-00508-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Transitioning patients from an originator to a corresponding biosimilar has been extensively studied in both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Although transitioning is considered well-tolerated, with no negative impacts on efficacy and/or safety, 2.6–25.8% of patients restart treatment with the originator (retransitioning). Retransitioning to the originator can be considered an indication of biosimilar treatment failure or dissatisfaction with biosimilar treatment. Increasing our knowledge of patients who retransition might help to reduce the number of patients retransitioning. Objective Our objective was to estimate the cumulative incidence of patients who retransitioned from a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor biosimilar to originator and to explore potential patient, disease, and treatment and implementation strategy factors associated with retransitioning. Method We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials databases until March 2021. Studies on TNFα inhibitors, biosimilar transitioning, and retransitioning were included. Transitioning was defined as switching from an originator to a biosimilar, and retransitioning was defined as switching from an originator to a biosimilar and back to the originator. Characteristics of the studies were descriptively analyzed. Studies were weighted by the number of patients transitioning, and the primary outcome was the median cumulative incidence of retransitioning. For each of the factors related to patient, disease, and treatment and implementation strategy, studies were stratified according to the categories of that factor. The weighted medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) of the cumulative incidence of retransitioning in these studies were calculated and compared to explore whether a potential association existed between these factors and the cumulative incidence of retransitioning. Results Of 994 screened publications, 37 were included. The weighted median cumulative incidence of retransitioning was 7.6% (IQR 6.8–17.2). Studies that included only patients with inflammatory bowel disease (6.6 vs. 15.1–17.7% for other indications), included only patients with stable disease (7.0 vs. 13.7% for including all patients), and did not offer retransitioning at the introduction of the biosimilar (7.0 vs. 11.1% for studies that offered retransitioning) reported less retransitioning. In addition, the incidence of retransitioning was lower when extra laboratory monitoring was part of the implementation strategy (1.6 vs. 6.1%) and when gainsharing (patients’ healthcare directly benefits from financial savings from transitioning) (1.4 vs. 7.2% for studies without gainsharing) was applied. Conclusions In studies on transitioning patients from TNFα originator to biosimilar, 8% of patients retransitioned. Retransitioning appeared to be lower in studies that included only patients with stable disease and in studies that did not offer patients the option of retransitioning at the introduction of the biosimilar. In addition, retransitioning appeared to be lower in studies that implemented extra laboratory monitoring as part of the biosimilar implementation strategy. Clinicians should consider implementing these suggestions as they might reduce retransitioning rates and improve the introduction of biosimilars in clinical practice. PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42021226381 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40259-021-00508-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanne W Meijboom
- Pharmacy Foundation of Haarlem Hospitals, Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helga Gardarsdottir
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Toine C G Egberts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs J Giezen
- Pharmacy Foundation of Haarlem Hospitals, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- Liese Barbier
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. .,Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Uyen-Cateriano A, Herrera-Añazco P, Mougenot B, Benites-Meza JK, Benites-Zapata VA. Non-medical switching of prescription medications, brand-name drugs and out-of-pocket spending on medicines among Peruvian adults. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/jphsr/rmab059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
This study evaluated the association between non-medical switching of prescription medications (NMSPM) with brand-name drugs and out-of-pocket spending (OPS) on drugs among Peruvian adults.
Methods
We conducted a secondary analysis of the National Survey of User Satisfaction Health using an analytical cross-sectional design. We included 3155 adults who went to drugstores and pharmacies with prescriptions. The independent variable was the self-reported NMSPM. The outcomes were brand-name drug purchase and OPS on drugs. We calculated crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the OPS on drugs was analysed using linear regression with crude and adjusted β and their 95% CIs.
Key findings
The rate of NMSPM was 6.7%, the proportion of brand-name drug purchases was 55.7% and the average spending on drugs was US$1.73. In the adjusted analysis, the proportion of brand-name drug purchases with NMSPM was higher than without (73.3% versus 54.5%; P < 0.001), with a statistically significant association (adjusted PR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.29 to 1.47; P < 0.001), and the association between NMSPM and OPS on drugs was statistically significant (adjusted β = 0.23; 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.30; P < 0.001).
Conclusions
There is a greater probability of brand-name drug purchases and OPS on drugs when NMSPM exists among adults who go to drugstores and pharmacies in Peru.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Percy Herrera-Añazco
- Universidad San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru
- Red Internacional en Salud Colectiva y Salud Intercultural, Mexico, Mexico
- Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación, EsSalud, Lima, Peru
| | - Benoit Mougenot
- Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
- Centro de Excelencia en Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| | - Jerry K Benites-Meza
- Sociedad Científica de Estudiantes de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo, Peru
- Grupo Peruano de Investigación Epidemiológica, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| | - Vicente A Benites-Zapata
- Red Internacional en Salud Colectiva y Salud Intercultural, Mexico, Mexico
- Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Choquette D, Chan J, Bardi M, Whiskin C, Torani G, Smith BK, Sihota A. Monitoring the transition of patients on biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: Consensus guidance for pharmacists. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2021; 19:2377. [PMID: 34621449 PMCID: PMC8455126 DOI: 10.18549/pharmpract.2021.3.2377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Recent approvals for novel agents such as the small molecule Janus kinase
inhibitors (JAKi), combined with the advent of biosimilars has widened the
gamut of available therapeutic options in the treatment of rheumatoid
arthritis (RA). This combined with the introduction of mandatory non-
medical switches to biosimilars in some jurisdictions by both public and
private payors has led to a significant increase in the volume of
therapeutic changes for patients. Pharmacists are well positioned to ensure
effective and safe transitions, however there is a significant unmet need
for objective and subjective clinical guidance around therapy as well
disease state monitoring in RA that facilitates best practices throughout
the patient journey. Objective: In this paper we aim to create a consensus derived monitoring algorithm for
pharmacists to facilitate best practices throughout therapeutic transitions
from originator biologic to other originator biologics, biosimilars, and
Janus kinase inhibitors in RA. Methods: The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) was used to understand if consensus could
be found among the participants. Clinically relevant questions were
developed to capture solutions to the identified unmet need. The faculty
considered the questions as individuals, and privately generated
answers/ideas. After discussion and consideration, the participants ranked
the ideas and established a consensus. Results: Based on the outcome of the consensus discussions, an algorithm was created
to help guide pharmacists through therapeutic transitions in RA. The tool
covers important topics such as pre-transition considerations, avoiding the
nocebo effect for biosimilars, specific considerations for each drug or
class, monitoring efficacy, and when to refer. Conclusions: New classes of anti-rheumatic drugs including JAKi, along with the
introduction of biosimilars are presenting more opportunity for therapeutic
changes and monitoring in patients with RA. We hope our evidence-based
consensus derived guidance tool will assist frontline pharmacists in
supporting their patients to a successful therapeutic transition in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Choquette
- MD. Rheumatology Institute of Montreal. Montreal, QC (Canada).
| | - Jonathan Chan
- MD. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC (Canada).
| | - Mohammad Bardi
- MD. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC (Canada).
| | - Carolyn Whiskin
- BScPharm, RPh. The Charlton Centre for Specialized Treatment. Hamilton, ON (Canada).
| | - Gabriel Torani
- BScPharm. Gabriel Torani et Habib Haddad, Pharmaciens Inc. Montreal, QC (Canada).
| | | | - Aaron Sihota
- BScPharm, RPh. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia. Vancouver, BC (Canada).
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fleischmann RM, Alvarez DF, Bock AE, Cronenberger C, Vranic I, Zhang W, Alten R. Randomised study of PF-06410293, an adalimumab (ADL) biosimilar, compared with reference ADL for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: results from weeks 26-52, including a treatment switch from reference ADL to PF-06410293. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001578. [PMID: 33883254 PMCID: PMC8061859 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics of biosimilar adalimumab (ADL) PF-06410293 (ADL-PF; adalimumab-afzb) versus EU-sourced reference ADL (ADL-EU) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on longer-term treatment and after being switched from ADL-EU to ADL-PF. Methods In this multinational, double-blind study, patients with active RA were initially randomised to ADL-PF or ADL-EU for 26 weeks (treatment period (TP) 1). At the start of TP2 (weeks 26–52), patients in the ADL-EU arm were blindly re-randomised 1:1 to remain on ADL-EU (ADL-EU/ADL-EU; n=135) or switched to ADL-PF (ADL-EU/ADL-PF; n=134); patients receiving ADL-PF continued blinded treatment (ADL-PF/ADL-PF; n=283). Results The American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response rates were comparable between treatment groups at all visits during TP2. At week 52, ACR20 response rates were 82.7% (ADL-PF/ADL-PF), 79.3% (ADL-EU/ADL-EU) and 84.3% (ADL-EU/ADL-PF). Other measures of deep response (ACR50/70, ACR/EULAR-defined remission, EULAR good response, and Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Based on High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein <2.6) and Health Assessment Questionnaire−Disability Index were maintained over TP2 and comparable between groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 43.5% (ADL-PF/ADL-PF), 44.4% (ADL-EU/ADL-EU) and 38.3% (ADL-EU/ADL-PF) of patients; there were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety profiles between groups. The percentage of patients who were antidrug antibody positive was comparable overall among ADL-PF/ADL-PF (47.3%), ADL-EU/ADL-EU (54.1%) and ADL-EU/ADL-PF (45.9%). Conclusions The similar efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics of ADL-PF and ADL-EU, maintained up to week 52, were unaffected by blinded treatment switch from ADL-EU to ADL-PF at week 26. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02480153; EudraCT number: 2014-000352-29.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy M Fleischmann
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel F Alvarez
- Global Product Development, Inflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amy E Bock
- Global Product Development, Clinical Development and Operations, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carol Cronenberger
- Global Product Development, Inflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ivana Vranic
- Worldwide R&D, Safety Surveillance Risk Management, Pfizer Inc, Tadworth, UK
| | - Wuyan Zhang
- Global Product Development, Biometrics and Data Management, Pfizer Inc, Lake Forest, Illinois, USA
| | - Rieke Alten
- University Medicine, Schlosspark Klinik, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gasteiger C, den Broeder AA, Stewart S, Gasteiger N, Scholz U, Dalbeth N, Petrie KJ. The mode of delivery and content of communication strategies used in mandatory and non-mandatory biosimilar transitions: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2021; 17:148-168. [PMID: 34409923 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Effective patient-provider communication is crucial to promote shared decision-making. However, it is unclear how to explain treatment changes to ensure patient acceptance, such as when transitioning from a bio-originator to a biosimilar. This review investigates communication strategies used to educate patients on transitioning to biosimilars and explores whether the willingness to transition and treatment persistence differs for the delivery (verbal or written) and the amount of information provided. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and relevant conference databases were systematically searched. Communication strategies from 33 studies (88% observational cohort studies) published from 2012 to 2020 were synthesized and willingness to transition, persistence, and subjective adverse events explored. Patients only received information verbally in 11 studies. The remaining 22 studies also provided written information. Cost-saving was the main reason provided for the transition. Patients were most willing to transition when receiving written and verbal information (χ2 = 5.83, p = .02) or written information that only addressed a few (3-5) concerns (χ2 = 16.08, p < .001). There was no significant difference for persistence or subjective adverse events (p's > .05). Few randomized controlled trials have been conducted. Available data shows more willingness to transition when patients received written and verbal information. Initial documents should contain basic information and consultations or telephone calls used to address concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Gasteiger
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Sarah Stewart
- Bone & Joint Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Norina Gasteiger
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Urte Scholz
- Department of Psychology- Applied Social and Health Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Research Priority Program 'Dynamics of Healthy Aging', University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Dalbeth
- Department of Rheumatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Keith J Petrie
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
From peptide hormones to monoclonal antibodies, advances in biotherapeutic medicines, or biologics, have brought incalculable benefits to patients, especially for conditions where previous classes of therapy were ineffective or non-existent. At the same time, the development of biologics has been accompanied by questions of access and cost. The advent of biosimilars, molecules highly similar to their reference biologics, has offered the promise of ameliorating cost and access challenges. However, issues regarding biosimilar uptake remain. Multiple factors impact the utilization of biosimilars by healthcare providers and perhaps the best recognized of these is education. This paper discusses the importance of education to biosimilar adoption and lists action-items that various stakeholders in healthcare can adopt to improve the overall understanding of this important class of therapeutics.
Collapse
|
32
|
Stavem K. Switching from one reference biological to another in stable patients for non-medical reasons: a literature search and brief review. JOURNAL OF MARKET ACCESS & HEALTH POLICY 2021; 9:1964792. [PMID: 34434534 PMCID: PMC8381978 DOI: 10.1080/20016689.2021.1964792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Background: The practice of non-medical switch (NMS) from a reference biological (originator) to a biosimilar is widely accepted in some countries. However, there is little documentation on the impact of NMS from one originator to another originator. Objectives: To assess the consequences for patients of NMS from one biological originator to another, based on existing literature. The focus was on efficacy and cost of treatment with TNF-α-inhibitors in three disease areas. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Ovid (PubMed, EMBASE) and abstracts from meetings in key therapeutic areas, to identify studies reporting efficacy, safety or costs by switching between originator biologics. Results: 167 references were identified and abstracts screened; 36 papers reviewed in full text, and 6 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Three clinical studies of NMS had very small sample sizes, but suggested that NMS is beneficial. The remaining three studies used administrative data with little clinical information, indicating that NMS was disadvantageous and associated with increased health care utilization and costs. Conclusions: There is very limited documentation on NMS from one originator biological to another, and the literature suffers from methodological limitations. The results are mixed and preclude drawing an overriding conclusion. Future studies, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Stavem
- Pulmonary Department, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Campus Ahus, Lørenskog, Norway
- Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tolonen HM, Falck J, Kurki P, Ruokoniemi P, Hämeen-Anttila K, Shermock KM, Airaksinen M. Is There Any Research Evidence Beyond Surveys and Opinion Polls on Automatic Substitution of Biological Medicines? A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2021; 35:547-561. [PMID: 34398421 PMCID: PMC8502744 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-021-00493-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Biosimilars are expected to decrease growing health care expenditures. Given that uptake of biosimilars has been modest, automatic substitution has been suggested to increase their use, but the practice is not yet allowed or implemented in many jurisdictions. Methods A systematic review was performed by searching databases Scopus, Medline (Ovid), CINAHL, and Web of Science. Peer-reviewed, original studies written in English and published during the period January 1, 2006 to April 24, 2021 reporting any interventions, pilots or any other studies including experiences or perceptions of any relevant stakeholders on automatic substitution of biologics were included without limitation by setting or geography. The quality of the included studies were evaluated by pre-determined criteria. Results Altogether, 27 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which 23 were surveys, and four semi-structured interviews reporting mainly stakeholders’ perceptions on automatic substitution. Most of the studies (56%, 15/27) were from Europe. Studies were conducted among prescribers (n = 12), pharmacists (n = 5), patients (n = 4), payers (n = 1), and mixed stakeholders (n = 5). The primary objective of the majority (81%, 22/27) of the studies was to investigate some other biosimilar topic than automatic substitution. The reported perceptions of substitution were mainly negative. Studies evaluating risks, safety or effectiveness, or reporting real-life experiences of biologic substitution were lacking except one intervention and two prospective risk management studies. The overall quality of the studies was low to moderate, and the results were not generalizable due to convenience sampling not representing the populations of interest, and low response rates. Conclusions The current research evidence on the automatic substitution of biologics is scarce and of low to moderate quality, reflecting low stakeholder knowledge and their cautious attitude towards biosimilars. The safe and efficient implementation of automatic substitution requires well-designed practices, pilot studies, and evolving legislation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40259-021-00493-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna M Tolonen
- HUS Pharmacy, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Stenbäckinkatu 9, 00029, Helsinki, Finland. .,Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Jenni Falck
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,University Pharmacy, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | | | - Kenneth M Shermock
- Center for Medication Quality and Outcomes, The Johns Hopkins Health System, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marja Airaksinen
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Biosimilar Interchangeability and Emerging Treatment Strategies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Commentary. GASTROENTEROLOGY INSIGHTS 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/gastroent12030026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This commentary summarizes a collection of key references published within the last ten years, and identifies pharmacologic research directions to improve treatment access and success through greater biosimilar or “follow-on” biologic utilization combined with other targeted small molecule agents that possess unique pathophysiologic mechanisms for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in adult and pediatric patients. Since they are not identical to the originator or reference biologic agent, all biosimilars are not generically equivalent. However, in the US and other countries, they are considered therapeutically interchangeable if the manufacturer has demonstrated no clinically meaningful differences from the reference product. Comparisons of different clinical initiation and switching scenarios are discussed with reference to interchangeability, immunogenicity, nocebo effect, cost effectiveness, and time courses for discontinuation rates.
Collapse
|
35
|
Loft N, Egeberg A, Rasmussen MK, Bryld LE, Nissen CV, Dam TN, Ajgeiy KK, Iversen L, Skov L. Outcomes Following a Mandatory Nonmedical Switch From Adalimumab Originator to Adalimumab Biosimilars in Patients With Psoriasis. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:676-683. [PMID: 33825804 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance The efficacy of adalimumab biosimilars is similar to that of brand-name adalimumab (Humira, hereinafter originator) in clinical trials. However, limited knowledge about real-world data exists for adalimumab biosimilars. Objective To assess the outcomes following a mandatory nonmedical switch from adalimumab originator to adalimumab biosimilars in patients with psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study assesses the outcomes following a switch from adalimumab originator to an adalimumab biosimilar. Patients in the Biological Treatment in Danish Dermatology (DERMBIO) registry, a Danish nationwide registry of all patients treated with biologics (including biosimilars) for psoriasis since 2007, were assessed for eligibility. All patients who switched from adalimumab originator to an adalimumab biosimilar between November 1, 2018, and May 1, 2019, were included in the adalimumab biosimilar cohort. All patients with a visit between May 1, 2017, and November 1, 2017, treated with adalimumab originator were included in the adalimumab originator cohort. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2020, to October 10, 2021. Exposure Switch from adalimumab originator to an adalimumab biosimilar. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 1-year drug retention in patients switching to adalimumab biosimilars compared with patients treated with adalimumab originator. Crude and adjusted retention rates for the adalimumab biosimilar cohort were compared with the adalimumab originator cohort with Cox proportional hazards regression using robust variance. Results A total of 348 patients were included in the adalimumab biosimilar cohort (mean [SD] age, 52.2 [13.6] years; 251 [72.1%] male) and 378 patients in the adalimumab originator cohort (mean [SD] age, 51.1 [14.1] years; 272 [72.0%] male). The 1-year drug retention rates were 92.0% (95% CI, 89.0%-94.9%) for the adalimumab biosimilar cohort and 92.1% (95% CI, 89.4%-94.8%) for the adalimumab originator cohort. Similar hazard ratios were observed between the 2 cohorts. The crude hazard ratios were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.61-1.70; P = .94) for all causes of drug discontinuation, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.39-1.73; P = .60) for insufficient effect, and 1.41 (95% CI, 0.52-3.77; P = .50) for adverse events for the adalimumab biosimilar cohort when compared with the adalimumab originator cohort. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study from Denmark, a nonmedical switch from adalimumab originator to adalimumab biosimilars was not associated with drug retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolai Loft
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.,Copenhagen Research Group for Inflammatory Skin, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Alexander Egeberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.,Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Erik Bryld
- Department of Dermatology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Lars Iversen
- Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lone Skov
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.,Copenhagen Research Group for Inflammatory Skin, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
The times they are a-changin - Don´t panic with a generic! Seizure 2021; 91:513-514. [PMID: 34030934 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
37
|
Patient perspectives on the British Columbia Biosimilars Initiative: a qualitative descriptive study. Rheumatol Int 2021; 42:1831-1842. [PMID: 33961101 PMCID: PMC8102664 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-04874-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
In May 2019, the Government of British Columbia (BC) announced the implementation of the Biosimilars Initiative, mandating the switch of biologic (originator) drugs to biosimilars for certain patient populations in the hopes of optimizing public resources. Through this qualitative study, we aimed to identify patients’ perspectives as they undergo this change. From October 2019 to July 2020, we conducted nine pre- and six post-switch to biosimilar interviews with BC, English speaking participants, who were 18 years or older, and were currently taking a biologic medication. Participants were interviewed pre- and post-switch to a biosimilar medication and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for qualitative analysis. Interviews were thematically analysed and major themes and sub-categories were elucidated. The themes derived from pre and post-switch interviews captured participants’ anticipated or experienced barriers and enablers to the policy change. In general, the fears and apprehension of participants approaching the switch, including concerns surrounding the efficacy and safety of biosimilars, were addressed by their rheumatologist and social support circles. For the most part, participants were able to successfully manage their disease regardless of their baseline concerns about efficacy and safety. Experiences of changes in health delivery models were also observed secondary to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic amongst participants. This study is the first of its kind to characterize the patient perspective regarding the BC Biosimilars Initiative. The incorporation of the patient perspective, including adequate provider-patient communication and shared decision-making can help to inform future non-medical switching policy changes.
Collapse
|
38
|
Afzali A, Furtner D, Melsheimer R, Molloy PJ. The Automatic Substitution of Biosimilars: Definitions of Interchangeability are not Interchangeable. Adv Ther 2021; 38:2077-2093. [PMID: 33745111 PMCID: PMC8107170 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01688-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In the USA, an interchangeability designation provides biosimilar sponsors with a pathway for achieving what is standard for small-molecule generics: pharmacy-level auto-substitution for an innovator. No other major health authority links interchangeability to automatic substitution, as all require the involvement of the prescriber or patient in a medication change. This editorial considers the clinical impact and practicality of auto-substitution. First, interchangeability is linked to non-medical switching (NMS), the practice of switching treatment in patients with stable disease for non-clinical reasons. NMS may generate negative sentiment in those unwilling or reluctant to switch, which can adversely impact treatment outcomes (i.e., nocebo effect). Indeed, in real-world studies of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, discontinuation rates have been shown to be higher in patients switched to biosimilars for non-medical reasons than in historical cohorts maintained on innovators. Second, interchangeability may impede pharmacovigilance and traceability, as not all jurisdictions require innovators and biosimilars to have distinct biologic names. Third, an interchangeability designation from the US Food and Drug Administration only permits a biosimilar to be automatically substituted for its innovator, not other biosimilars (if available). Pharmacist education would be needed to avoid off-label, automatic substitution among biosimilars of a single innovator. Last, once granted, an interchangeability designation exists in perpetuity under current US federal law. However, the supply chains of innovators and biosimilars are maintained independently, with no requirement for reconfirmation of biosimilarity or interchangeability. We feel that additional guidance is needed for the auto-substitution of biosimilars and innovators to become a reality.
Collapse
|
39
|
Luger T, Dirschka T, Eyerich K, Gollnick H, Gupta G, Lambert J, Micali G, Ochsendorf F, Ständer S, Traidl-Hoffmann C. Developments and challenges in dermatology: an update from the Interactive Derma Academy (IDeA) 2019. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 34 Suppl 7:3-18. [PMID: 33315305 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The 2019 Interactive Derma Academy (IDeA) meeting was held in Lisbon, Portugal, 10-12 May, bringing together leading dermatology experts from across Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Over three days, the latest developments and challenges in relation to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, evaluation and management of dermatological conditions were presented, with a particular focus on acne, atopic dermatitis (AD) and actinic keratosis (AK). Interesting clinical case studies relating to these key topics were discussed with attendees to establish current evidence-based best practices. Presentations reviewed current treatments, potential therapeutic approaches and key considerations in the management of acne, AK and AD, and discussed the importance of the microbiome in these conditions, as well as the provision of patient education/support. It was highlighted that active treatment is not always required for AK, depending on patient preferences and clinical circumstances. In addition to presentations, two interactive workshops on the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections/diseases (STIs/STDs) presenting to the dermatology clinic, and current and future dermocosmetics were conducted. The potential for misdiagnosis of STIs/STDs was discussed, with dermoscopy and/or reflectance confocal microscopy suggested as useful diagnostic techniques. In addition, botulinum toxin was introduced as a potential dermocosmetic, and the possibility of microbiome alteration in the treatment of dermatological conditions emphasized. Furthermore, several challenges in dermatology, including the use of lasers, the complexity of atopic dermatitis, wound care, use of biosimilars and application of non-invasive techniques in skin cancer diagnosis were reviewed. In this supplement, we provide an overview of the presentations and discussions from the fourth successful IDeA meeting, summarizing the key insights shared by dermatologists from across the globe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Luger
- Department of Dermatology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - T Dirschka
- Centroderm Clinic, Wuppertal, Germany.,Faculty of Health, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - K Eyerich
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Unit of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Gollnick
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - G Gupta
- University Department of Dermatology, Edinburgh, UK
| | - J Lambert
- Department of Dermatology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - G Micali
- Dermatology Clinic, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - F Ochsendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - S Ständer
- Center for Chronic Pruritus, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - C Traidl-Hoffmann
- Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine, UNIKA-T, Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Genovese MC, Kellner H, Arai Y, Muniz R, Alten R. Long-term safety, immunogenicity and efficacy comparing FKB327 with the adalimumab reference product in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: data from randomised double-blind and open-label extension studies. RMD Open 2021; 6:rmdopen-2019-000987. [PMID: 32371430 PMCID: PMC7299509 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Objective FKB327 is a biosimilar of the antitumour necrosis factor adalimumab reference product (RP). A randomised, double-blind (DB) phase 3 study compared the efficacy of FKB327 with the RP in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) inadequately controlled with methotrexate (MTX). A subsequent randomised open-label extension (OLE) study with treatment switching assessed long-term safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of FKB327 compared with the RP. Methods Patients with moderate-to-severe, active RA on a stable dose of MTX were randomised 1:1 to receive FKB327 or the RP (40 mg subcutaneously every other week) for 24 weeks. Patients who completed the DB study were enrolled in the OLE and rerandomised 2:1 to receive FKB327 or the RP; two-thirds continued on the same treatment and one-third switched for 30 weeks. All patients received FKB327 through Week 76. Long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed. Results Of 728 patients in the DB study, 645 were enrolled in the FKB327-OLE study. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20 response rates for all treatment groups at Week 30 in the OLE ranged from 83.2% to 85.9%. ACR20 response rates remained stable for all patients regardless of single- or double-switching treatment and were similar for all treatment sequences through Week 76. The safety profile and incidence of antidrug antibodies were comparable across sequences. Conclusion Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were similar among patients with RA treated with FKB327 or the RP for up to 2 years, and were not affected by single- or double-switching treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C Genovese
- Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Herbert Kellner
- Specialist Practice in Rheumatology and Gastroenterology, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Alvarez DF, Wolbink G, Cronenberger C, Orazem J, Kay J. Interchangeability of Biosimilars: What Level of Clinical Evidence is Needed to Support the Interchangeability Designation in the United States? BioDrugs 2021; 34:723-732. [PMID: 32990892 PMCID: PMC7669758 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-020-00446-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
A biosimilar is a biologic drug that is "highly similar to a reference (originator) product, with no clinically meaningful differences between the two products in safety, purity, and potency". Regulatory approval of a biosimilar is based on analytical, structural, and functional comparisons with the reference product, comparative nonclinical (in vivo) studies, clinical pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity. In addition, comparative clinical efficacy and safety assessments are usually conducted and, taken together, comprise the "totality of the evidence" supporting biosimilarity. For a biosimilar to meet the additional designation of interchangeability in the United States (US), the applicant must demonstrate that the biological drug can be expected to produce the "same clinical result as the reference product in any given patient" and "if the biological drug is administered more than once to an individual, the risk in terms of safety or diminished efficacy of alternating or switching between the use of the biological drug and the reference product is no greater than the risk of using the reference product without such alternation or switch". The challenges faced in conducting clinical studies to support a designation of interchangeability, as defined in the final interchangeability guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration, are considered. Potential alternative approaches to generating adequate and sufficient clinical data to support a designation of interchangeability are also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F Alvarez
- Inflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Inc, 500 Arcola Rd, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA.
| | | | | | - John Orazem
- Global Biostatistics and Data Management, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Departments of Medicine and of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.,Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mazzoni D, Vener C, Mazzocco K, Monzani D, Pravettoni G. The Psychological Risks Associated With the Non-medical Switch From Biologics to Biosimilars. Front Psychol 2021; 12:605643. [PMID: 33584474 PMCID: PMC7873288 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Mazzoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Vener
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Monzani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kim H, Alten R, Cummings F, Danese S, D'Haens G, Emery P, Ghosh S, Gilletta de Saint Joseph C, Lee J, Lindsay JO, Nikiphorou E, Parker B, Schreiber S, Simoens S, Westhovens R, Jeong JH, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Innovative approaches to biologic development on the trail of CT-P13: biosimilars, value-added medicines, and biobetters. MAbs 2021; 13:1868078. [PMID: 33557682 PMCID: PMC7889098 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1868078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The biosimilar concept is now well established. Clinical data accumulated pre- and post-approval have supported biosimilar uptake, in turn stimulating competition in the biologics market and increasing patient access to biologics. Following technological advances, other innovative biologics, such as “biobetters” or “value-added medicines,” are now reaching the market. These innovative biologics differ from the reference product by offering additional clinical or non-clinical benefits. We discuss these innovative biologics with reference to CT-P13, initially available as an intravenous (IV) biosimilar of reference infliximab. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation, CT-P13 SC, has now been developed. Relative to CT-P13 IV, CT-P13 SC offers clinical benefits in terms of pharmacokinetics, with comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, as well as increased convenience for patients and reduced demands on healthcare system resources. As was once the case for biosimilars, nomenclature and regulatory pathways for innovative biologics require clarification to support their uptake and ultimately benefit patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HoUng Kim
- Celltrion Healthcare , Incheon, Republic of Korea.,Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University , Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Rieke Alten
- Rheumatology Research Center, Schlosspark-Klinik Charité, University Medicine Berlin , Berlin, Germany
| | - Fraser Cummings
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust , Southampton, UK
| | - Silvio Danese
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS and Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University , Milan, Italy
| | - Geert D'Haens
- Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Amsterdam University Medical Centers , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, The Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds , UK
| | - Subrata Ghosh
- The Institute of Translational Medicine, Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR BRC, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
| | | | - JongHyuk Lee
- Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, College of Life and Health Science, Hoseo University , Asan, Republic of Korea
| | - James O Lindsay
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust , London, UK
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College, London, and Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital , London, UK
| | - Ben Parker
- Kellgren Centre for Rheumatology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre , Manchester, UK
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Medicine I, Christian-Albrechts-University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein , Kiel, Germany
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rene Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ji Hoon Jeong
- Department of Global Innovative Drugs, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University and Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University , Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital , Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.,Inserm U1256 NGERE, Lorraine University , Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Informing Patients about Biosimilar Medicines: The Role of European Patient Associations. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14020117. [PMID: 33557030 PMCID: PMC7913743 DOI: 10.3390/ph14020117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Biosimilar medicines support the sustainability of national healthcare systems, by reducing costs of biological therapies through increased competition. However, their adoption into clinical practice largely depends on the acceptance of healthcare providers and patients. Patients are different from health care professionals (HCPs), who are informing themselves professionally. For patients, the biosimilar debate only becomes actual when they are confronted with disease and drug choices. This paper provides a literature review on how patients are and should be informed about biosimilars, searching in scientific databases (i.e., Medline, Embase). Several large surveys have shown a lack of knowledge and trust in biosimilars among European patients in recent years. This review identified five main strategies to inform patients about biosimilars: (1) provide understandable information, (2) in a positive and transparent way, (3) tailored to the individual’s needs, (4) with one voice, and (5) supported by audiovisual material. Moreover, the importance of a multistakeholder approach was underlined by describing the role of each stakeholder. Patients are a large and diffuse target group to be reached by educational programs. Therefore, patient associations have become increasingly important in correctly informing patients about biosimilar medicines. This has led to widespread biosimilar information for patients among European patient associations. Therefore, a web-based screening of European Patients’ Forum (EPF) and International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations (IAPO) member organizations on publicly available information about biosimilars was performed. We found that the level of detail, correctness, and the tone of the provided information varied. In conclusion, it is paramount to set up a close collaboration between all stakeholders to communicate, develop, and disseminate factual information about biosimilars for patients.
Collapse
|
45
|
Dutta B, Huys I, Vulto AG, Simoens S. Identifying Key Benefits in European Off-Patent Biologics and Biosimilar Markets: It is Not Only About Price! BioDrugs 2021; 34:159-170. [PMID: 31792843 PMCID: PMC7113204 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-019-00395-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Biosimilar medicines have shown similarity with the originator biologic and offer a similar clinical outcome generally at a lower cost. This paper identifies benefits of off-patent biologics and biosimilars, and illustrates these benefits with empirical data from Europe. We provide a narrative review of published literature on values and benefits of biosimilars in Europe. The results describe cost savings as the key driver stemming from the lower price of biosimilars, than that of originator products, and from price competition between biosimilar(s), originator, and next-generation products. Cost savings may then translate into a number of other associated benefits. The lower price of biosimilars and similar effectiveness to the originator biologics improve cost effectiveness, implying that reimbursement can be granted or extended to other patient groups, or that the biologic therapy can be moved to an earlier line of treatment. Cost savings from biosimilars can be used to increase patient access to therapy or to increase the number of healthcare professionals. Finally, competition between off-patent biologics and biosimilars may stimulate an innovation in the formulation and development of next-generation biologics. Our paper illustrates that the benefit of off-patent biologics and biosimilars is not restricted to cost savings, but that these medicines may contribute to an expansion of medical treatment options for patients, hence concomitantly contributing to the long-term sustainability of the healthcare system. This review provides a broader view for clinical and economic decision makers and healthcare professionals on the added benefits of off-patent biologics and their use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binita Dutta
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium. .,Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Association of nocebo hyperalgesia and basic somatosensory characteristics in a large cohort. Sci Rep 2021; 11:762. [PMID: 33436821 PMCID: PMC7804006 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80386-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Medical outcomes are strongly affected by placebo and nocebo effects. Prediction of who responds to such expectation effects has proven to be challenging. Most recent approaches to prediction have focused on placebo effects in the context of previous treatment experiences and expectancies, or personality traits. However, a recent model has suggested that basic somatosensory characteristics play an important role in expectation responses. Consequently, this study investigated not only the role of psychological variables, but also of basic somatosensory characteristics. In this study, 624 participants underwent a placebo and nocebo heat pain paradigm. Additionally, individual psychological and somatosensory characteristics were assessed. While no associations were identified for placebo responses, nocebo responses were associated with personality traits (e.g. neuroticism) and somatosensory characteristics (e.g. thermal pain threshold). Importantly, the associations between somatosensory characteristics and nocebo responses were among the strongest. This study shows that apart from personality traits, basic somatosensory characteristics play an important role in individual nocebo responses, in agreement with the novel idea that nocebo responses result from the integration of top-down expectation and bottom-up sensory information.
Collapse
|
47
|
Barbier L, Simoens S, Vulto AG, Huys I. European Stakeholder Learnings Regarding Biosimilars: Part II-Improving Biosimilar Use in Clinical Practice. BioDrugs 2020; 34:797-808. [PMID: 33063267 PMCID: PMC7669768 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-020-00440-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the benefits biosimilars offer in terms of cost savings and patient access, healthcare professionals and patients have been reluctant to use them. Next to insufficient understanding of and trust in biosimilars, healthcare professionals and patients have questions about switching and the nocebo effect when using biosimilars in clinical practice. In addition, clear motivation to use biosimilars may be lacking among these stakeholders. OBJECTIVE This study aims to provide recommendations on how to improve biosimilar use on both a clinical and a practical level based on insights from healthcare professionals (physicians, hospital pharmacists, nurses), patients (or their representatives), and regulators across Europe. METHODS We conducted 44 semi-structured interviews with experts from five stakeholder groups across Europe: physicians, hospital pharmacists, nurses, regulators, and patients/representatives. Interviews were transcribed ad verbatim and transcripts analysed according to the thematic framework method. RESULTS Based on the insights and considerations of the experts interviewed, we identified a number of recommendations to improve the use of biosimilars in clinical practice. Regarding switch implementation, the experts voiced support for the following actions: (1) disseminate evidence from and experience with (multiple) switching; (2) provide clear, one-voice regulatory guidance about the interchangeability of biosimilars and their reference product; (3) apply a multi-stakeholder implementation and communication protocol to guide switching in clinical practice; (4) apply a pragmatic approach when taking switch decisions; and (5) avoid mandated switching, allowing stakeholder communication and alignment. When discussing approaches to increase the willingness of stakeholders to use biosimilars, we concluded that actions should be centred on (1) communicating the benefits provided by biosimilars and the introduction of market competition, (2) increasing awareness among stakeholders about medicine prices and their societal responsibility to use medicines in a cost-effective manner, (3) transparent reporting about the allocation of savings, (4) sharing biosimilar usage data among hospitals and prescribers to allow peer-to-peer benchmarking, and (5) applying a balanced combination of tangible and non-tangible incentives that can be tailored to offset the time and effort expended by stakeholders when switching to a biosimilar. CONCLUSIONS This study proposes a number of strategic, practical, and overarching recommendations to support healthcare professionals and inform decision makers to improve the clinical use of biosimilars and the willingness of stakeholders to use them. The proposed solutions to fully realise the potential of biosimilars for healthcare systems and patients include developing practical switch guidance, being transparent about the gains from biosimilar use (and how savings are allocated), and developing a combination of non-tangible and tangible incentives for involved stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liese Barbier
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
St Clair-Jones A, Prignano F, Goncalves J, Paul M, Sewerin P. Understanding and Minimising Injection-Site Pain Following Subcutaneous Administration of Biologics: A Narrative Review. Rheumatol Ther 2020; 7:741-757. [PMID: 33206343 PMCID: PMC7672413 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-020-00245-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Injection-site pain (ISP) is a subjective side effect that is commonly reported with the subcutaneous administration of biological agents, yet it may only be a concern to some. Multiple factors related to the product formulation, such as pH, volume and excipients, and/or to the injection process have the potential to contribute to ISP, while patient-related factors, such as low body weight, gender and age, can make an individual more susceptible to experiencing ISP. While total elimination of ISP remains unlikely with any subcutaneously administered agent, it can be minimised by helping the patient to develop a confident and competent injection technique via robust and effective training. Careful management of patient expectations along with open discussion regarding the potential risk of ISP may serve to minimise treatment-related anxieties and, importantly, allow the patient to remain in control of his/her treatment. Other interventions to help minimise ISP include psychological interventions, allowing biologics to reach room temperature prior to injection, using the most suitable injection device for the individual patient and selecting an alternative drug formulation, when available. Productive patient–physician communication remains important in order to support and optimise treatment experience and adherence, while also providing the opportunity for patients to discuss any ISP-related issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja St Clair-Jones
- Pharmacy Department, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
| | - Francesca Prignano
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Joao Goncalves
- iMed-Research Institute for Medicines, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Muriel Paul
- Department of Pharmacy, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France
- University of Paris-Est Créteil, Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics (EpidermE), EA 7379, UPEC, Créteil, 94010, France
| | - Philipp Sewerin
- Department and Hiller Research Unit of Rheumatology, University Clinic Düsseldorf (UKD), Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Feagan BG, Marabani M, Wu JJ, Faccin F, Spronk C, Castañeda-Hernández G. The Challenges of Switching Therapies in an Evolving Multiple Biosimilars Landscape: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence. Adv Ther 2020; 37:4491-4518. [PMID: 32910420 PMCID: PMC7547992 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01472-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
With the increasing availability of biosimilars, the practice of switching therapies for non-medical reasons between an originator biologic and an analogous biosimilar has become more common. The evidence to support this practice mostly comes from single-switch randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world (RW) evidence studies. However, as more biosimilars of the same originator enter the market, multiple switching events between originators and biosimilars is becoming a reality, despite limited evidence to support the efficacy and safety of such practice. Some countries have established guidelines, policies, or laws related to interchangeability and/or automatic substitution, whereas others have left these practices unregulated or controlled by other components of the healthcare system. Collectively, guidelines on single non-medical switching are often vague, with even less focus given to multiple non-medical switching, leaving this practice mostly unregulated. This narrative review will first discuss the current regulatory perspectives on non-medical switching and challenges associated with switching therapies, particularly with the availability of multiple biosimilars. We will then review the current evidence from RCTs and RW studies in the light of three different multiple-switch scenarios currently taking place in clinical practice: switching between an originator and a single biosimilar, switching between biosimilars of the same originator, and the clinical practice of switching back to the originator (i.e., switchbacks) after a failure of the initial non-medical switch to the analogous biosimilar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian G Feagan
- Department of Medicine, Western University, Robarts Clinical Trials, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada.
| | - Mona Marabani
- Department of Medicine, Canterbury Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jashin J Wu
- Dermatology Research and Education Foundation, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández
- Departamento de Farmacología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Retention Rate and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P13 in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics Registry. BioDrugs 2020; 34:89-98. [PMID: 31734899 PMCID: PMC6985057 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-019-00393-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective The aim was to evaluate long-term drug retention, discontinuation, efficacy and safety of CT-P13 and reference infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics (KOBIO) registry. Methods Patients included adults with RA who received CT-P13 or reference infliximab between December 2012 and December 2017. Drug retention, efficacy (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28]–erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] or DAS28–C-reactive protein [CRP] and American College of Rheumatology [ACR] core set measure), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed over 4-years’ follow-up. Results Data from 199 RA patients (CT-P13: n = 147; reference infliximab: n = 52) were analyzed. Median treatment duration was 1.22 years for CT-P13 and 1.40 years for reference infliximab (p = 0.67). Overall, 82% of patients received first-line therapy. Drug retention of CT-P13 versus reference infliximab was comparable for the overall population (p = 0.84) and for first-line (p = 0.66) and subsequent treatment lines (p = 0.96). Treatment changes or discontinuations occurred in 65.2% of patients with CT-P13 and 69.6% with reference infliximab. The most common reason for treatment changes or discontinuing treatment was lack of efficacy (CT-P13: 31.9%; reference infliximab: 34.8%). CT-P13 demonstrated comparable improvements in DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP and ACR responses to reference infliximab. Overall, 19 grade 3 AEs were reported for CT-P13 and eight for reference infliximab. Conclusion Long-term data from patients with RA treated in routine clinical practice in Korea showed that CT-P13 had a comparable drug retention rate to reference infliximab, with similar efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01965132. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-019-00393-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|