Drug-Induced Neutropenia During Treatment of Non-Neoplastic Dermatologic Diseases: A Review

Immunosuppressants against acute kidney injury: what to prefer or to avoid?

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical global health issue associated with high mortality rates, particularly in patients undergoing renal transplants and major surgeries. These individuals often receive immunosuppressants to dampen immune responses, but the impact of these drugs on AKI remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to provide a detailed understanding of the effects of different classes of immunosuppressants against AKI, elucidating their role in either exacerbating or mitigating the occurrence or progression of AKI.

METHODS

Several preclinical and clinical reports were analyzed to evaluate the impact of various immunosuppressants on AKI. Relevant preclinical and clinical studies were reviewed through different databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, and official websites like https://clinicaltrials.gov to understand the mechanisms underlying the effects of immunosuppressants on kidney function.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Specific immunosuppressants have been linked to the progression of AKI, while others demonstrate renoprotective effects. However, there is no consensus on the preferred or avoided immunosuppressants for AKI patients. This review outlines the classes of immunosuppressants commonly used and their impact on AKI, providing guidance for physicians in selecting appropriate drugs to prevent or ameliorate AKI.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the effects of immunosuppressants on AKI is crucial for optimizing patient care. This review highlights the need for further research to determine the most suitable immunosuppressants for AKI patients, considering both their efficacy and potential side effects.

Chronic neutropenia: how best to assess severity and approach management?

INTRODUCTION

Neutropenia is a relatively common finding in medical practice and the medical approach requires a gradual and pertinent diagnostic procedure as well as adapted management.

AREAS COVERED

The area of chronic neutropenia remains fragmented between diverse diseases or situations. Here physicians involved in different aspects of chronic neutropenia gather both the data from medical literature till the end of May 2021 and their experience to offer a global approach for the diagnosis of chronic neutropenia as well as their medical care.

EXPERT OPINION

In most cases, the neutropenia is transient, frequently related to a viral infection, and not harmful. However, neutropenia can be chronic (i.e. >3 months) and related to a number of etiologies, some clinically benign, such as so-called 'ethnic' neutropenia. Autoimmune neutropenia is the common form in young children, whereas idiopathic/immune neutropenia is a frequent etiology in young females. Inherited neutropenia (or congenital neutropenia) is exceptional, with approximately 30 new cases per 10⁶ births and 30 known subtypes. Such patients have a high risk of invasive bacterial infections, and oral infections. Supportive therapy, which is primarily based on daily administration of an antibiotic prophylaxis and/or treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), contributes to avoiding recurrent infections.