Long-term survival analysis of sublobar resection versus lobectomy for older patients with early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumour: a database-based propensity score-matched study

Segmentectomy and wedge resection are equivalent for the treatment of early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumors: A retrospective cohort study

Currently, there is no consensus regarding the extent of surgery for stage I pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumors, which encompass typical carcinoid (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC) tumors. Sublobar resection includes segmental resection and wedge resection; the former is regarded as a type of anatomical resection that is better suited for tumor treatment. Therefore, it needs to be further verified whether differences exist in the effects of the two surgical methods on the survival time of patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used. The primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) time. Survival differences were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. There was no significant difference in survival between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups after PSM in either the TC or AC tumor groups (all p > 0.05). A total of 1680 patients underwent pulmonary wedge resection (TC: n = 1547, AC: n = 133), and 398 patients underwent segmental resection (TC: n = 365, AC: n = 33). After PSM, there were no statistically significant differences in survival, regardless of whether OS or CSS was considered the primary endpoint (OS: p = 0.337; CSS: p = 0.470). Furthermore, segmental resection did not prolong patient survival time compared with wedge resection in different subgroup analyses on the basis of histology, age, and tumor size (all p > 0.05). Finally, the same results were obtained via multivariate Cox analysis (OS: p = 0.153; HR = 1.21; CSS: p = 0.351, HR = 1.32). Sublobar resection could be considered for patients with early-stage typical or atypical pulmonary carcinoid, provided that a rigorous lymph node evaluation is conducted. If the tumor is distant from the pulmonary hilum, either segmentectomy or wedge resection may be performed depending on the specific location of the tumor and the clinical condition of the patient.

ETV6-NTRK2 Fusion in a Patient With Metastatic Pulmonary Atypical Carcinoid Successfully Treated With Entrectinib: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Pulmonary atypical carcinoid (AC) is an extremely rare neuroendocrine tumor. The neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions are reported in only 0.5% of nonsmall cell lung cancer, and are more rare in AC with only one previously reported case. Currently, there is little established evidence on the optimal therapeutic strategies and prognosis for advanced cases. We present a female patient with metastatic AC after complete resection. Due to low expression of somatostatin receptor in this case, somatostatin analogs and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy were not available. After pursuing other alternative treatments, including chemotherapy (ie, carboplatin, etoposide, capecitabine, temozolomide, and paclitaxel), everolimus, and atezolizumab, she returned with significant progression, including innumerable subcutaneous nodules, left pleura metastasis, multiple bone metastases, and brain metastases. New biopsy analysis revealed an ETV6-NTRK2 fusion. She was immediately administered the first-generation tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor entrectinib at a dose of 600 mg q.d. A subsequent month of treatment resulted in a complete response in all of the metastatic lung lesions. To date, she has maintained sustained benefit for at least 1 year from initiation of entrectinib. Here, we present the first case of a female patient with metastatic AC harboring the ETV6-NTRK2 fusion, and successfully treated with entrectinib, providing evidence for the application of entrectinib in patients with NTRK-positive AC, and underscoring the critical role of molecular profiling for such cases.

Prognostic nomogram and epidemiological analysis for lung atypical carcinoid: A SEER database and external validation study

PURPOSE

Our study aims to delineate the epidemiological distribution of pulmonary carcinoids, including atypical carcinoid (AC) and typical carcinoid (TC), identify independent prognostic factors, develop an integrative nomogram and examine the effects of various surgical modalities on atypical carcinoid-specific survival (ACSS).

METHODS

Joinpoint regression model and age-group distribution diagram were applied to determine the epidemiological trend of the pulmonary carcinoids. Univariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-based Cox regression models were used to identify independent factors, and a nomogram and web-based predictor were developed to evaluate prognosis of AC patients individually. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analyses to compare the scope of various surgical interventions, with and without G-computation adjustment, utilising restricted mean survival time (RMST) to assess survival disparities.

RESULTS

A total of 1132 patients were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) and a separate medical centre in China. The mean age of AC patients was 63.4 years and a smoking history was identified in 79.8% of AC patients. Joinpoint analysis shows rising annual rates of new AC and carcinoid cases among lung cancers. Both the proportion of pulmonary TC and AC within the total lung cancer population exhibits an L-shaped trend across successive age groups. The nomogram predicted 1, 3 and 5 years of AC with excellent accuracy and discrimination. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, conducted both pre- and post-adjustment, demonstrated that sublobar resection's survival outcomes were not inferior to those of lobectomy in patients with stage I-II and stage III disease.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to reveal epidemiological trends in pulmonary carcinoids over the past decade and across various age cohorts. For patients with early-stage AC, sublobar resection may be a viable surgical recommendation. The established nomogram and web-based calculator demonstrated decent accuracy and practicality.

Clinical efficacy of thermal ablation for the treatment of pulmonary carcinoid tumor: a propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of thermal ablation in the treatment of pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumor.

METHODS

Data of patients with inoperable PC diagnosed from 2000 to 2019 were obtained from the SEER database and analyzed according to different therapeutic modality: thermal ablation vs non-ablation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce intergroup differences. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to compare intergroup differences of overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). Cox proportional risk models were used to reveal prognostic factors.

RESULTS

After PSM, the thermal ablation group had better OS (p < .001) and LCSS (p < .001) than the non-ablation group. Subgroup analysis stratified by age, sex, histologic type and lymph node status subgroups showed similar survival profile. In the subgroup analysis stratified by tumor size, the thermal ablation group showed better OS and LCSS than those of the non-ablation group for tumors ≤3.0 cm, not statistically significant for tumors >3.0 cm. Subgroup analysis by M stage showed that thermal ablation was superior to non-ablation in OS and LCSS for patients with M0 stage, but no significant difference was found in subgroups with distant metastatic disease. Multivariate analysis showed that thermal ablation was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.25-0.46, p < .001) and LCSS (HR: 0.23, 95%CI: 0.12-0.43, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

For patients with inoperable PC, thermal ablation might be a potential treatment option, especially in M0-stage with tumor size ≤3 cm.

Prognostic significance of examined lymph node count in older patients with stage T1N0M0 pulmonary carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) for older early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumour (PC) patients is unknown.

AIMS

To explore the prognostic effect of the ELN count in older patients with stage T1N0M0 PC resection.

METHODS

Clinical data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on stage T1N0M0 PC older patients (age ≥ 65 years) who underwent sublobar resection and lobectomy between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed for two ELNs-stratified (≥ 7 vs. < 7 ELNs) propensity score-matched (PSM) groups. Overall survival (OS) was calculated and compared with Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test, respectively, and the independent prognostic factors were estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Among 1077 participants (median dissected LN 4; mean ELNs 6.19 ± 7.04), 393 (36.49%) in the ≥ 7 ELNs group had better 5- and 10-year OS than the < 7 ELNs group (before PSM: 5-year OS = 93.01 vs. 85.22%, 10-year OS = 72.38 vs. 58.99%, p < 0.001; after PSM: 5-year OS = 93.12 vs. 85.97%, 10-year OS = 75.25 vs. 60.03%, p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis stratified by histologic type and surgical method showed a similar survival trend. Age-stratified analysis showed that, compared with the < 7 ELNs group, the ≥ 7 ELNs group had better 5- and 10-year OS but only better 5-year OS in participants > 75 years. Compared with the < 7 ELNs group, subgroup analysis by tumour size showed superior OS with 1.1-3.0 cm tumours in the ≥ 7 ELNs group, but no significant intergroup difference with tumours < 1.0 cm. Multivariate Cox analysis showed ≥ 7 ELNs was associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSION

Higher ELNs correlated with increased long-term survival in older early‑stage PC patients, and a minimum of 7 ELNs are recommended for prognostication in these patients (especially those aged 65-75 years, with tumour size 1.1-3.0 cm).

Carcinoid tumors outside the abdomen

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are epithelial malignancies that can arise from multiple tissues. Gastrointestinal (GI) NETs are the most common; in this review of extra-abdominal carcinoid tumors, we focus our discussion on bronchial and thymic carcinoid tumors. Bronchial carcinoid tumors comprise a quarter of all NETs and less than 2% of all lung cancers. Thymic carcinoid tumors are extremely rare, accounting for 5% of thymic tumors. Both bronchial and thymic carcinoid tumors are histologically classified as either typical or atypical based on their mitotic rate (less than 2 or 2-10 mitoses per 10 high-powered fields (HPF), respectively). Both bronchial and thymic carcinoids can present with symptoms of obstruction and potentially carcinoid syndrome. The gold standard of management of bronchial and thymic carcinoid tumors is surgical resection. For patients with advanced disease, first-line systemic therapy is generally somatostatin analog monotherapy with octreotide or lanreotide. In patients with refractory disease, therapy generally involves peptide receptor radioligand therapy, everolimus, or cytotoxic chemotherapy. There are ongoing, prospective trials comparing the mainstays of systemic therapy for these patients, as well as ongoing evaluations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and multi-kinase inhibitors. Prognosis for both bronchial and thymic carcinoid tumors depends on histologic grade, local versus invasive disease, and extent of metastases. Herein we provide a summary of the pathophysiologic and clinical background, the current state of the field in diagnosis and management, and note of key ongoing prospective trials for patients with bronchial and thymic carcinoid tumors.

Does Examined Lymph Node Count Influence Survival in Surgically Resected Early‑stage Pulmonary Typical Carcinoid Tumors?

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) in resected early‑stage pulmonary typical carcinoid tumors (TC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent sublobar resection and lobectomy for stage T1N0M0 TC between 2004 and 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and enrolled in the ELNs≥4 or ELNs<4 groups (optimal cutoff using X-tile). Propensity score matching balanced baseline intergroup characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare overall survival (OS) rates. Cox proportional hazard model analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among 2234 participants, 961 (43.02%) and 1273 (56.98%) had ELNs <4 and ≥4, respectively. The 5-year OS was significantly higher in the ELNs≥4, compared with ELNs<4, group, both before and after propensity score matching (95.41% vs. 89.71%, P<0.001 and 95.24% vs. 90.28%, P=0.004), respectively. Surgical subgroup analysis confirmed this survival trend in the lobectomy and sublobar resection groups. Tumor size-based subgroup analysis revealed superior OS with ELNs≥4 than ELNs<4 for tumors measuring 1.1-3.0 cm but not for tumors <1.0 cm. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that ELN≥4 contributed to improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher the ELNs, the greater the long-term survival rate in patients with early‑stage TC. Therefore, we recommend at least 4 ELNs as the cutoff value for evaluating the prognosis of early‑stage TCs, especially for patients with a tumor size of 1.1 to 3.0 cm.