Effects of vitamin D on parathyroid hormone and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review

Role of nutritional vitamin D in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder: A narrative review

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder has complex and diverse clinical manifestations, including the simplest abnormalities of calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormone detected in blood, abnormalities of bone transformation and mineralization in bone, and calcification of blood vessels or other soft tissues detected on imaging. Patients with CKD-MBD combined low bone mineral density and fragility fractures are referred to as CKD-MBD with low bone mineral density. Vascular calcification refers to ectopic deposition of calcium phosphate in the blood vessel walls and heart valves. The degree of vascular calcification was inversely proportional to bone mineral density. The more severe the degree of vascular calcification, the lower the bone mineral density, and the higher the risk of death, indicating that the bone-vascular axis exists. Activation and alteration of the Wnt signaling pathway are central to the treatment of vascular diseases in uremia. Vitamin D supplementation can prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism, activate osteoblasts, relieve muscle weakness and myalgia, and reduce vascular calcification. Nutritional vitamin D may improve vascular calcification in uremia patients by regulating Wnt signaling pathway.

Analytical, experimental and clinical aspects of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement by two ligand assays are differentially biased by disease-related factors

BACKGROUND

Pathological concentrations of plasma proteins may confound the results of binding assays. We compared two routinely used total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [t-25(OH)D] methods: a chemiluminescence-immuno-(CLIA) and an electro-chemiluminescence-protein-binding-(ECLPBA) assay.

METHODS

Two sub-studies were performed: 1) In an "in vitro" study, exogenous albumin was added to pools of patients' sera with low albumin levels; and 2) In "ex vivo" studies of Cohort_1: sera of hospitalized patients with low albumin levels, and of healthy controls; and of Cohort_2: outpatients with chronic kidney disease in pre-dialysis stage, or on peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis were investigated by the routine and LC_MS/MS methods.

RESULTS

When increasing albumin concentrations were "in vitro" added, t-25(OH)D levels were overestimated by ECLPBA, and underestimated by CLIA. In patients' sera, positive correlations were detected between t-25(OH)D-vitamin D binding protein (DBP) values by both routine methods, and between t-25(OH)D-albumin values by all three methods. Much higher t-25(OH)D was measured by LC_MS/MS in all subgroups. When altering albumin levels with constant DBP concentration, the "in vitro" experiment revealed a higher sensitivity of ECLPBA. The "ex vivo" measurements demonstrated clinically relevant differences between the routine methods.

CONCLUSION

Both routine methods are dependent of the matrix effect in hospitalized patients, which is predicted by the DBP/Albumin ratios. In hemodialysis, ECLPBA is recommended because its outcomes differ less from those of LC_MS/MS. The results of LC_MS/MS are reliable, but not routinely available. A guidance would be valuable on how levels measured by the binding methods differ from those by LC-MS/MS in various clinical conditions.

Effects of Oral Paricalcitol and Calcitriol Treatment on Peritoneal Membrane Characteristics of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients - A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) is frequently complicated by technique failure preceded by peritoneal remodeling. Vitamin D has potent immunomodulatory characteristics: anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, anti-fibrotic properties, and influences on the macrophage phenotype. Little is known about the relation between pleiotropic effects attributed to vitamin D₃ and the peritoneal membrane and what is the most appropriate vitamin D sterol in prevention of peritoneal remodeling in PD patients. Animal studies have suggested that paricalcitol has advantageous effects: decrease in plasma markers of inflammation, less peritoneal fibrosis, less pronounced PD-induced omental angiogenesis, and prevention of loss of ultrafiltration. We investigated whether paricalcitol is advantageous over calcitriol in PD patients.

METHOD

A multicenter open-label 1:1 randomized non-blinded clinical pilot study enrolled prevalent continous ambulatory PD (CAPD) patients for a period of 6 months comparing paricalcitol with calcitriol. All patients were treated with biocompatible PD fluids. The primary endpoint was peritoneal transport parameters, exploratory endpoints were biomarkers of peritoneal damage and cell analysis (including M1/M2 macrophages), and safety endpoints were metabolic parameters.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were included. Fourteen were randomized to treatment with paricalcitol. There was no difference in peritoneal transport parameters between the groups. We found similar Kt/V, D/P creatinine, D/D0 glucose, ultrafiltration, residual renal function and 24-h urine volume during the study. There was no difference in biomarker concentrations in peritoneal effluents, and no difference in leucocyte differentiation or mesothelial cells between the groups at any time point. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels decreased after administration of calcitriol after 12 and 24 weeks compared with baseline (p = 0.001; p = 0.025). Parathyroid hormone levels in the paricalcitol group did not change significantly.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study we investigated the effect of active vitamin D in PD patients. We found no specific benefit of active vitamin D₃ in vitamin D₃-sufficient PD patients. Additional studies in preferably incident patients, with an adequate PTH suppression in the intervention groups and during a longer period, are required to test the beneficial effects of active vitamin D₃ over no treatment and to investigate whether in 25(OH)D₃-deficient PD patients the type of active vitamin D₃ matters.

Comparison of two different vitamin D supplementation regimens with oral calcifediol in kidney transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and recommendations on how to replenish vitamin D deposits are scarce.

AIM

To evaluate, in KTR, the safety and efficacy of calcifediol in two different vitamin D supplementation regimens, in order to assess the most suitable dose.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective observational study with two calcifediol supplementation regimens randomly prescribed by clinicians in liquid form, at 266 mcg doses, monthly or biweekly. We analyzed 168 KTR with a functioning allograft for more than 6 months. Patients receiving other vitamin D forms, calcimimetics or bisphosphonates were excluded. Before calcifediol initiation (pre-treatment levels) and after at least 3 months of treatment (post-treatment levels), we measured serum levels of 25-OH vitamin D (25(OH)D), parathyroid hormone (PTH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), calcium (sCa), phosphate (sPO4) and creatinine (sCreat).

RESULTS

In the monthly group (n = 72), 25(OH)D levels increased from 14 ng/ml [interquartile range, IQR 9-22] at baseline to 31 [20-38] (p = 0.000), PTH decreased from 124 pg/ml [87-172] to 114 [78-163] (p = 0.006), while sCa and sPO4 remained stable. In the biweekly group (n = 96), 25(OH)D increased from 14 ng/ml [9-20] at baseline to 39 [28-52] (p = 0), PTH decreased from 141 pg/ml [95-221] to 112 [90-180] (p = 0.000), sCa remained stable and sPO4 increased from 3.3 ± 0.6 mg/dl to 3.5 ± 0.6 (p = 0.003). Renal function remained stable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Vitamin D reposition with oral calcifediol, in a biweekly or monthly regimen, is safe and effective in improving 25(OH)D blood levels and in decreasing PTH in kidney transplant recipients.

Effects of sun exposure and dietary vitamin D intake on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Vitamin D deficiency is common in hemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to identify whether or not sun exposure and dietary vitamin D intake have effects on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) status in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The objective was to identify the main determinants of serum vitamin D status in the study subjects.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 47 HD patients (19 males and 28 females) was performed. We assessed serum 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)₂D levels between August and September 2012 and analyzed the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in HD patients. To evaluate the determinants of serum 25(OH)D levels, we surveyed dietary vitamin D intake, degree of sun exposure, and outdoor activities. To compare biological variables, serum 25(OH)D was stratified as below 15 ng/ml or above 15 ng/ml.

RESULTS

Mean 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)₂D levels were 13.5 ± 5.8 ng/ml and 20.6 ± 11.8 pg/ml, respectively. The proportions of serum 25(OH)D deficiency (< 15 ng/ml), insufficiency (15-< 30 ng/ml), and sufficiency (≥ 30 ng/ml) in subjects were 72.4%, 23.4%, and 4.3%, respectively. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in female patients was 78.6%, whereas that in males was 63.2% (P = 0.046). Vitamin D intake and sun exposure time were not significantly different between the two stratified serum 25(OH)D levels. Dietary intake of vitamin D did not contribute to increased serum 25(OH)D levels in HD patients. The main effective factors affecting serum 25(OH)D status were found to be the sun exposure and active outdoor exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypovitaminosis D is common in HD patients and is higher in females than in males. Sun exposure is the most important determinant of serum 25(OH)D status in HD patients.