Comparison of slot-scanning standing, supine, and fulcrum radiographs for assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study

Preliminary Study of Motion Preservation Following Posterior Dynamic Distraction Device in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

BACKGROUND

Motion-sparing scoliosis surgeries such as the posterior dynamic distraction device (PDDD) are slowly increasing in use. However, there is limited clinical data documenting postoperative motion across the PDDD construct. With this cohort study, we aim to measure sagittal and coronal motion following PDDD. We hypothesize coronal and sagittal spinal motion will be partially preserved across the construct.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative coronal range of motion across the instrumented levels was compared. Available flexion/extension radiographs were evaluated postoperatively to assess sagittal arc of motion. Radiographs from latest follow-up were used.

RESULTS

At a mean of 1.9 years (1 to 5 y), flexibility radiographs were available on 29 patients treated with PDDD (17 thoracic, 12 lumbar). Mean age at surgery was 16 years (12 to 25). Postoperative coronal arc of motion in PDDD patients was 11 degrees (3 to 19 degrees) in the thoracic spine and 10 degrees (0 to 28 degrees) in the lumbar spine. Compared with preoperative motion, the thoracic arc of motion was maintained by 33% (35 to 11 degrees) and lumbar motion was maintained by 30% (34 to 10 degrees). Flexion-extension radiographs were available on 7 patients. Sagittal arc for the upper instrumented vertebral end plate to the lower instrumented vertebral endplate of the cohort was 10 degrees in the thoracic spine (6 to 18) and 14 degrees in the lumbar spine (5 to 21). Sagittal measurements for the changes in the arc of the upper and lower screws on the construct were 4 degrees in the thoracic group (2 to 8) and 9 degrees in the lumbar group (2 to 17). By latest follow-up 11 patients (38%) underwent reoperation, with most cases due to implant breakage (N=4, 14%), extender misalignment (N=2, 7%), and screw misplacement (N=2, 7%).

CONCLUSION

At mean 1.9 years postoperatively, PDDD preserves measurable spinal motion over the construct both in the coronal and the sagittal plane without evidence for autofusion. Coronal arc of motion averages 10 to 12 degrees and sagittal arc of motion ranged from 4 to 14 degrees, although this varies by patient. This study confirms that PDDD for pediatric scoliosis preserves a measurable degree of postoperative flexibility both in the sagittal and coronal planes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-therapeutic study.

Evidence-based Indications for Vertebral Body Tethering in Spine Deformity

Posterior spinal fusion has long been established as an effective treatment for the surgical management of spine deformity. However, interest in nonfusion options continues to grow. Vertebral body tethering is a nonfusion alternative that allows for the preservation of growth and flexibility of the spine. The purpose of this investigation is to provide a practical and relevant review of the literature on the current evidence-based indications for vertebral body tethering. Early results and short-term outcomes show promise for the first generation of this technology. At this time, patients should expect less predictable deformity correction and higher revision rates. Long-term studies are necessary to establish the durability of early results. In addition, further studies should aim to refine preoperative evaluation and patient selection as well as defining the benefits of motion preservation and its long-term effects on spine health to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Vertebral body tethering for non-idiopathic scoliosis: initial results from a multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been described for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Results of the technique for non-idiopathic scoliosis have not yet been reported.

METHODS

An international multicenter registry was retrospectively queried for non-idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with minimum 2-year follow-up. Success at 2 years was defined as Cobb angle < 35 degrees and no fusion surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 251 patients treated with VBT, 20 had non-idiopathic scoliosis and minimum 2-year follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 12.4 years (range 10 to 17 years). Mean major Cobb angle at enrollment was 56 degrees. Of those, 18 patients had a major thoracic curve and two had a major lumbar curve. Of the 20 patients, nine met criteria for success (45%). Eight of the 20 patients had poor outcomes (four fusions, four with curve > 50 degrees). Success was associated with smaller preoperative Cobb angle (50 vs. 62 degrees, p = 0.01) and smaller Cobb angle on initial postop imaging (28 degrees vs. 46 degrees, p = 0.0007). All patients with Cobb angle < 35 degrees on 1st postop imaging had a successful result, with the exception of one patient who overcorrected and required fusion. Syndromic vs. neuromuscular patients had a higher likelihood of success (5 of 7, 71%, 2 of 10, 20%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Selected non-idiopathic scoliosis can be successfully treated with VBT, but failure rates are high and were associated with large curves, inadequate intraoperative correction and neuromuscular diagnosis. Achieving a Cobb angle less than 35 degrees on 1st standing radiograph was associated with a successful outcome which was achieved in 45% of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV (retrospective review study).

Vertebral body tethering compared to posterior spinal fusion for skeletally immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: preliminary results from a matched case-control study

PURPOSE

Direct comparisons between vertebral body tethering (VBT) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are limited. We aimed to evaluate 2-year results of VBT and PSF to report comparative outcomes.

METHODS

26 prospectively enrolled VBT patients were matched 1:1 by age, gender, Risser sign and major curve magnitude with PSF patients. At a minimum 2-year follow-up, surgical results and radiographic outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Operative time, anesthesia time, blood loss, and length of stay were significantly lower in the VBT group (< 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The major curve at 2 years was corrected by 46% in the VBT group vs. 66% in the PSF (p = 0.0004). Success following VBT, defined as no fusion surgery and Cobb angle < 35° at the 2-year follow-up, was seen in 20 VBT patients (77%) (p = 0.0003) and correlated with mean Cobb angle of < 35° on 3-month imaging. 12 VBT patients (46%) showed curve improvement over time, and those patients had significantly lower mean Cobb angle on the 3-month radiograph than non-modulators (23° vs 31°, p = 0.014). At 2 years, cord breakage occurred in five patients (19%). By 2 years, three VBT patients developed complications (2 pleural effusion and 1 overcorrection needing return to OR). In contrast to PSF, growth continued at T1-T12 (mean 13 mm) and over the instrumented levels (mean 10 mm) following VBT, compared to no growth over instrumented segments in the fusion cohort (p = 0.011, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In Sanders stages 3 and 4 patients treated in the USA, Cobb angle < 35° on 3-month imaging was associated with success at the 2-year follow-up. Curve correction was superior in the PSF group with 96% achieving curve correction to < 35° vs. 77% of the VBT patients. Cord breakage was noted in 19% of VBT patients at the 2-year follow-up. Three patients developed complications in both the VBT and PSF cohorts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II (prospective study with matched retrospective comparison group).

Measurable Lumbar Motion Remains 1 Year After Vertebral Body Tethering

INTRODUCTION

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is growing in popularity for skeletally immature patients with scoliosis because of presumed preservation of spinal motion. Although results have shown preserved thoracic motion, there is minimal data to support motion over the lumbar instrumented segments after VBT. The purpose of this study was to analyze the range of motion of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine after lumbar VBT.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients treated with lumbar VBT underwent low-dose biplanar flexion-extension and lateral bending radiographs at 1 year after surgery to assess motion. Coronal motion at 1 year was compared with preoperative side-bending radiographs. The angle subtended by the screws at the upper instrumented vertebra and lower instrumented vertebra was measured on left-bending and right-bending radiographs to evaluate the coronal arc of motion and was compared with preoperative values over the same levels measured from the end plates. At 1 year postoperatively, the sagittal angle was measured over the instrumented levels on flexion and extension radiographs.

RESULTS

Of the 71 scoliosis patients who underwent VBT at our center eligible for 1-year follow-up, 20 had lumbar instrumentation, all of whom had lumbar bending films available at 1 year after surgery. Seven patients had both thoracic and lumbar VBT on the same day and 13 had lumbar or thoracolumbar tether only. Mean age was 13.5±1.9 years. Mean preoperative major coronal curve measured 52+8 degrees (range: 42 to 70) and mean 27 degrees (range: 13 to 40) at latest follow-up. Mean levels instrumented was 8 (range: 5 to 12), with the lowest instrumented level typically L3 (N=14). The mean preoperative coronal arc of motion over the instrumented segments was 38±13 degrees (range: 19 to 73 degrees) and decreased after surgery to a mean arc of 17±7 degrees (range: 7 to 31 degrees). However, 19 of the 20 (95%) had at least a 10-degree coronal arc of motion. Patients maintained on average 46% (range: 22% to 100%) of their preoperative coronal arc of lumbar motion over the instrumented lumbar segments. On flexion-extension lateral radiographs taken at 1 year postoperatively, there was a mean postoperative arc of motion of 30±13 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar VBT resulted in preserved flexion and extension motion at 1 year postoperatively. We also noted some preserved coronal plane motion, but this was decreased compared with preoperative values by ~50%. These findings provide proof of concept that some spinal motion is preserved after lumbar VBT in contrast to lumbar fusion where no motion is retained over the instrumented segments.

Defining the learning curve in CT-guided navigated thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering

Estimated blood loss (EBL), anesthesia time, operative time, and length of stay decreased over 67 navigated vertebral body tethering (VBT) surgeries performed in a 5-year period, indicating a steep learning curve.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

HYPOTHESIS

There would be a significant improvement in the performance of VBT procedures over time at a single tertiary center in terms of perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

PURPOSE

Learning a new procedure for surgeons takes time, and previous studies have described improved efficiency as experience grows. VBT procedures are increasingly being performed in the US, but there is limited data regarding the learning curve specifically regarding the use of CT-guided navigation. We sought to assess the learning curve of VBT with respect to estimated blood loss, anesthesia time, operative time, length of stay, percent correction of the major curve at first follow-up. We further sought to characterize change in rates of 90-day complications.

METHODS

Pediatric scoliosis patients who underwent thoracic or lumbar CT-guided navigated VBT with a consistent surgical team at a single tertiary referral center between 2015 and 2020 were included. Student t-test was used to assess change in perioperative parameters over time, and also results between first and latest group of 20 patients were compared.

RESULTS

67 patients met inclusion criteria. Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, anesthesia time and length of stay significantly decreased over the 5-year study period. Specifically, on comparison of our first 20 patients with our last 20, the former had greater EBL (282 vs 116 ml, p = 0.0005; 8.5% vs 3.6%, p = 0.0024), operative time (4.8 h vs. 3.3 h, p < 0.001), anesthesia time (7.4 h vs. 5.7 h, p = 0.0001), and length of stay (3.7 days vs. 3.2 days, p = 0.019). We also found significant reduction in EBL, operative time, anesthesia time and LOS in patients who underwent VBT surgery after 2019. There was no significant change in the percent correction of the major Cobb angle at first erect imaging or 90-day complications over the 5-year study period or between the various cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This series has demonstrated improvements in surgical efficiency for VBT including reduced EBL, operative time, anesthesia time and hospital stay over a 5-year period. This indicates improved surgical technique and outlines the significant learning curve for surgeons who wish to perform this procedure. Improved surgeon training programs and newer instrumentation may reduce this learning curve.

TAKE HOME POINT

67 cases in a 5-year period, VBT procedures performed at a single center had significantly decreased EBL, anesthesia time, operative time, and length of stay, indicating a steep learning curve.