Flow impacts of hot/cold zone infection control procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the emergency department

A time-motion study on impact of spatial separation for empiric airborne precautions in emergency department length of stay

AIMS

To evaluate the impact of spatial separation on patient flow in the emergency department.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, time-and-motion analysis conducted from 15 to 22 August, 2022 at the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. During this duration, spatial separation was implemented in critical and semi-critical zones to separate patients with symptoms of respiratory infections into respiratory area, and patients without into non-respiratory area. This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

METHODS

Patients triaged to critical and semi-critical zones were included in this study. Timestamps of patient processes in emergency department until patient departure were documented.

RESULTS

The emergency department length-of-stay was longer in respiratory area compared to non-respiratory area; 527 min (381-698) versus 390 min (285-595) in critical zone and 477 min (312-739) versus 393 min (264-595) in semi-critical zone. In critical zone, time intervals of critical flow processes and compliance to hospital benchmarks were similar in both areas. More patients in respiratory area were managed within the arrival-to-contact ≤30 min benchmark and more patients in non-respiratory area had emergency department length-of-stay ≤8 h.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of spatial separation in infection control should address decision-to-departure delays to minimise emergency department length of stay.

IMPACT

The study evaluated the impact of spatial separation on patient flow in the emergency department. Emergency department length-of-stay was significantly prolonged in the respiratory area. Hospital administrators and policymakers can optimise infection control protocols measures in emergency departments, balancing infection control measures with efficient patient care delivery.

REPORTING METHOD

STROBE guidelines.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

None.

TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The study obtained ethics approval from the institution's Medical Ethics Committee (MREC ID NO: 20221113-11727).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The author has checked and make sure our submission has conformed to the Journal's statistical guideline. There is a statistician on the author team (Noor Azhar).

COVID-19 Incidence After Emergency Department Visit

Background

The emergency department (ED) at the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (VAGLAHS) saw a decrease in the number of visits during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known whether risk mitigation procedures may help reduce the spread of COVID-19 infections for veterans visiting the ED. Therefore, we reviewed patient visits to the ED for diagnoses other than COVID-19 to assess whether these patients had an increased COVID-19 positivity rate within 21 days of the initial visit.

Observations

Risk mitigation procedures instituted by the VAGLAHS ED included a COVID-19 outdoor testing tent, immediate isolation of persons under investigation for COVID-19, disinfection protocols between high-risk patient encounters, dedicated training in donning and doffing personal protective equipment, implementation of 2-physician airway teams for COVID-19 intubations, use of electronic tablets to communicate with COVID-19 patients, and implementation of social distancing initiatives in the waiting room to minimize COVID-19 exposures. The average positivity rate at the VAGLAHS ED during this time frame was 0% to 6.7%, compared with 6.9% to 33.3% within the wider VAGLAHS.

Conclusions

Implementing risk mitigation procedures in the VAGLAHS ED helped minimize exposure and subsequent diagnosis of COVID-19 for veterans who visited the VAGLAHS ED for symptoms not associated with COVID-19 infection. Seeking acute medical care in the ED did not put patients at higher risk of contracting COVID-19.