Antihypertensive effect of cardiovascular Ca2+-antagonist in hypertensive patients in the absence and presence of beta-adrenergic blockade

Combined therapy with Ca-antagonists and beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agents in chronic stable angina

There have been conflicting reports on the safety of combining beta-adrenergic receptor blockers and Ca++-antagonists, especially verapamil, in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Warnings have been raised against additive negative chronotropic and inotropic effects. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of simultaneous administration of verapamil, 360 mg daily, and atenolol, 100 mg daily, with that of either drug alone. Eighteen patients (mean age 58 years) with chronic stable angina were included in the study. After a two-week run-in period, the patients received either drug alone for six weeks and were then given the combination for another six weeks. Frequent ECG and blood pressure measurements were performed. Radionuclide evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction was done before and at the end of the combined therapy. Exercise testing using a bicycle ergometer was performed during each treatment period. Only one patient developed sinus bradycardia when on combined therapy (48 bpm). The P-Q time increased with single drug therapy as well as with the combination (p less than 0.01). Maximal exercise time increased more with the combination than with single drug therapy. No serious adverse hemodynamic effects were recorded. LVEF increased by 4.6% (p less than 0.01) with the combined therapy. A decrease in nitroglycerine consumption occurred, beeing most pronounced with the combined therapy and corresponding to a subjective improvement. It is concluded that an additive negative chronotropism occurred but that the combination is safe and offers an effective therapeutic alternative in chronic stable angina.

Calcium influx blockers in the treatment of essential hypertension

Elevated vascular resistance is the key factor in most cases of essential hypertension. Vascular resistance is determined by the sarcoplasmatic concentration of free Ca2+. Experimental studies have shown an increased dependence for the noradrenaline-induced contraction on extracellular Ca2+ from the aorta to the small resistance vessels. This is in accordance with the potent vasodilating effect found with Ca2+-influx inhibitors in man. Furthermore, a selective enhancement of the vasodilating response to verapamil has been found in patients with essential hypertension as compared to normotensive subjects. The verapamil-induced vasodilation in the hypertensive patients was positively correlated to plasma adrenaline concentration. These findings suggest accentuated Ca2+-influx dependent vasoconstriction in essential hypertension, which is related to the activity of the sympathetic nervous system. Acute administration of verapamil and nifedipine results in a distinct fall in blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension but not in normotensive subjects. Generally, the percentage fall in blood pressure with Ca2+-channel blockers has been closely positively correlated to the initial blood pressure level and in an open study with 43 patients with essential hypertension the decrease in blood pressure to verapamil was also positively correlated to the age of patients. These data may provide the basis for a new treatment concept for essential hypertension proposing a Ca2+-channel blocker as the first choice for the older patients and a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent as the first line drug for the younger patients. Combined treatment with a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent and a Ca2+-channel blocker seems most efficient in normalizing blood pressure in many therapy-resistant hypertensive patients.

Antihypertensive effects at rest and during exercise of a calcium blocker, nifedipine, alone and in combination with metoprolol

The effects of metoprolol and/or nifedipine on blood pressure were studied in 12 hypertensive males at rest and during standardized exercise on an ergometer bicycle. Metoprolol (100 mg X 2) and nifedipine (10 mg X 3) gave similar blood pressure reductions both at rest and during exercise. When the drugs were combined, the antihypertensive effect was potentiated. The PQ interval was not affected during any treatment period. No adverse reactions to the combined treatment were noted. The combination of a calcium blocker with vasodilating properties with a beta-blocker, which reduces cardiac output, thus seems a logical and promising therapeutic approach in the treatment of hypertension.

Hemodynamic effects of calcium channel blockers in essential hypertension

Calcium channel blockers decrease blood pressure in essential hypertension due to a marked reduction of systemic vascular resistance (arteriolar tone). They also dilate conducting arteries but have no venodilatory effect in antihypertensive doses. With the dihydropyridines (e.g. nifedipine) and diltiazem there is a transient increase in heart rate and cardiac output but this is not observed with verapamil. The vasodilatory responsiveness in the resistance vessels to calcium channel blockers is selectively enhanced in patients with established essential hypertension but not in the early borderline phase of hypertension. During treatment with chlorthalidone, atenolol, acebutolol or nitrendipine for four to six weeks the reduction of blood pressure is accompanied by a selective decrease in the vasodilatory responsiveness to calcium channel blockers.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of a novel potassium channel opener, SKP-450, in healthy volunteers

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of SKP-450, a novel K+ channel opener, a single blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-rising, parallel-group study was conducted in 28 healthy volunteers. The volunteers were randomly allocated to dosage groups of 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, 200 micrograms, and 300 micrograms. Single doses of SKP-450 were administered orally, after overnight fasting, and serial blood sampling and pharmacodynamic measurements were performed up to 48 hours after the drug was administered. The 200 micrograms group was further studied for food interactions in a crossover fashion. Drug concentrations in plasma were determined by HPLC. Hemodynamic changes after drug administration were evaluated by serial measurements of blood pressure (BP), pulse rate (PR), cardiac index (CI), and total peripheral resistance (TPR), using computerized impedance cardiography. Changes in plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone concentrations (PAC) were determined 4 and 24 hours after drug administration. Both SKP-450 and SKP-818, an active metabolite, showed linear pharmacokinetic characteristics, and food intake did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetic characteristics of either compound. Dose-related pharmacological effects were obvious for both the 200 micrograms and 300 micrograms groups. Hemodynamic parameters related to vasodilation and reflex tachycardia, such as maximum changes in diastolic BP, PR, CI, and TPR, showed significant dose-dependent changes. The area under the time-effect curve (AUEC) of the parameters also showed a similar dose-dependent pattern. The PRA and PAC exhibited significant changes 4 hours after drug administration in the 300 micrograms group. Adverse effects, such as headaches, were more frequently observed at the higher dose levels. SKP-450 was generally well tolerated by these normotensive subjects. The antihypertensive efficacy of SKP-450 needs to be evaluated in hypertensive patients after multiple dosing.

Effect of Nifedipine on the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Irbesartan in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, nifedipine has the potential to alter the pharmacokinetics, and therefore possibly the pharmacodynamics and efficacy or safety, of irbesartan. The objectives of the current study were to determine the effects of concomitant administration of nifedipine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irbesartan in 12 healthy subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an open-label, randomized, crossover study. Each subject received irbesartan 300 mg once daily for 4 days in one period and irbesartan 300 mg once daily plus long-acting nifedipine (Procardia XL, Pratt Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY) 30 mg once daily for 4 days in the other period. The order of treatment periods was randomized, and a minimum 7-day washout phase separated the two periods. Steady state was achieved by day 3. On day 4, no significant differences were observed between the two treatments with respect to maximum concentration of irbesartan at the end of the dosing interval (C(max)) or the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve during a dosing interval (AUC(tau)) of irbesartan. Steady-state C(max) and AUC(tau) met the criteria for bioequivalence when irbesartan was administered alone or with nifedipine. On day 4, mean plasma renin activity was somewhat higher at every point but one when irbesartan was administered with nifedipine; however, no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in mean 24-hour AUC values. On day 4, there was a modest overall decrease from baseline in mean blood pressure for both treatments. No significant differences were observed between the two treatments in mean 24-hour AUC values for seated diastolic or systolic blood pressure. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant administration of nifedipine 30 mg with irbesartan 300 mg for 4 days in healthy subjects (1) does not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of irbesartan, (2) results in C(max) and AUC(tau) values for irbesartan that meet the criteria for bioequivalence, and (3) is well tolerated.

Use of calcium antagonists in patients with ischemic heart disease and systemic hypertension

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) and systemic hypertension commonly coexist in a large number of patients, and the presence of hypertension is a risk factor for worsening IHD. A monotherapy that would effectively treat both is thus an attractive idea, and calcium antagonists have been evaluated in this role. Calcium antagonists exert therapeutic effects through a combination of actions, including systemic and peripheral vasodilation, negative inotropy, and reduced nodal conduction. In randomized, double-blind clinical trials, verapamil compares favorably with propranolol in the alleviation of angina and hypertension. Both diltiazem and nifedipine, as well as long-acting diltiazem, are also effective in treating the combined condition. In addition, each of these drugs enhances exercise tolerance and favors compliance with calcium antagonist therapy. Recent questions regarding the safety of this class of drug have tempered the enthusiasm for their use as first-line therapy in cardiovascular disease. In particular, short-acting dihydropyridine derivatives, including nifedipine and isradipine, may increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality because of reflex sympathetic stimulation. The results of appropriately controlled, prospective clinical trials will provide more definitive conclusions. For now, we must be cautious in the use of calcium antagonist monotherapy for combined IHD and hypertension.

Pharmacological studies on a new antihypertensive agent, S-2150, a benzothiazepine derivative: 3. Hypotensive and antimyocardial-stunning effects in dogs

The hypotensive and antimyocardial-stunning effects of a new 1,5-benzothiazepine antihypertensive agent, S-2150, were investigated in dogs. S-2150 (30 mg/kg, p.o.) decreased the blood pressure in conscious renal hypertensive dogs. Although the maximal hypotensive effect of S-2150 was observed at 5-9 h after administration, the effect of diltiazem was seen at 2.0 h. Arrhythmia was not observed as a hypotensive effects of S-2150 but was markedly induced by diltiazem. In anesthetized open-chest dogs, S-2150 (20 micrograms/kg/min, i.v.) caused by hypotensive effect similar to that of diltiazem but decreased myocardial work (double product) by much less than did diltiazem. S-2150 more promptly improved the local myocardial stunning caused by occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery and its reperfusion. This effect did not accompany the energy-sparing action in ischemic/reperfused myocardium, which was different from the case of diltiazem. In isolated dog mesenteric arteries, S-2150 relaxed KCl and phenylephrine contracture. These results suggest that S-2150 is a favorable hypotensive agent for hypertensive patients with ischemic heart disease. Blockage of both Ca2+ channels and alpha 1-adrenoceptors by S-2150 seems to lead to cardiovascular effects different from those of diltiazem.

A diuretic is more effective than a beta-blocker in hypertensive patients not controlled on amlodipine and lisinopril

The combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a calcium antagonist has a synergistic effect in patients with more severe hypertension. However, when this combination fails to control blood pressure, it is not clear which drug is then additive. The aim of this work was to study in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design the effect on blood pressure of the addition of either a thiazide diuretic (bendrofluazide, 5 mg once daily) or a beta-blocker (atenolol, 100 mg once daily) or placebo each for a month in hypertensive patients who are not adequately controlled on the combined treatment of amlodipine 5 mg once daily and lisinopril 5 mg twice daily. Eighteen patients with a supine diastolic pressure of more than 90 mm Hg after at least 1 month on the combined treatment of amlodipine and lisinopril were enrolled in the study. The results show that in patients whose blood pressures are not controlled by the combination of amlodipine and lisinopril, the addition of bendrofluazide 5 mg once daily causes a significant fall in blood pressure compared with placebo and a significantly greater fall than 100 mg atenolol once daily.

Antihypertensive and renal effects of acute and chronic therapy with a dihydropyridine Ca-antagonist in patients with different salt sensitivity

We evaluated the effect of the dihydropyridine Ca-channel blocker nitrendipine on blood pressure (BP) and electrolyte urinary excretion after acute and chronic therapy in 33 patients with different NaCl sensitivity as assessed by a modification of the test of Grim and colleagues. Acute nitrendipine administration significantly reduced BP in the group as a whole, although the hypotensive effect was greater in patients with greater NaCl sensitivity; this difference was still evident after 1 month of chronic therapy. Furthermore, urinary sodium and calcium excretion significantly increased in the 3 h after nitrendipine administration during both acute and chronic therapy: these effects on electrolyte excretion were independent of the NaCl sensitivity of the subject.

Calcium antagonists. Drug interactions of clinical significance

The interaction of calcium antagonists, including the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (e.g. nifedipine), verapamil and diltiazem, with drugs from other classes has major clinical ramifications as the use of drug combinations increases in frequency. Combinations are used in the treatment of disorders ranging from hypertension to cardiac rhythm disturbances, angina pectoris and peripheral vasospastic disease. In this era of organ transplantation, drugs like cyclosporin are coming into potential conflict with an ever-growing list of drugs. Drug combinations used as part of long term therapies are also making their appearance in toxic drug reactions, including antituberculous and anticonvulsant agents. Bronchodilators and H2-blockers also fall into this category of potential culprits of combined drug toxicity, and the interactions of calcium antagonists with beta-blockers and antiarrhythmic agents are also becoming a matter of concern.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of oral nicardipine in treatment of urgent hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled clinical trial

This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral nicardipine for the treatment of urgent hypertension in the emergency department. Of 57 patients with urgent hypertension 53 patients were enrolled: 36 men and 17 women, 43 black and 10 white, age range 48 +/- 11 years, and diastolic blood pressure 128 +/- 7 mm Hg. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg nicardipine or placebo in blind fashion followed by 30 mg open-label nicardipine in nonresponders. Responders to one or two doses of nicardipine received 30 or 40 mg nicardipine three times a day for 1 week after discharge from the emergency department. Adequate blood pressure reduction, defined as a reduction of diastolic blood pressure to less than 100 mm Hg or by at least 20 mm Hg, was achieved in 65% and 22% of patients who received 30 mg nicardipine or placebo (p = 0.002). Adequate blood pressure reduction after administration of open-label nicardipine occurred in 76% of the nonresponders to placebo. Blood pressure reductions were maintained at 1 week after discharge. The drug was well tolerated, and no significant adverse events occurred. We conclude that oral nicardipine is a safe and effective drug for the initial treatment of urgent hypertension.

Controlled study with a new sustained-release formulation of nifedipine in essential hypertensive patients

The authors studied the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of a new sustained-release formulation of nifedipine 50 mg once a day, in comparison with nifedipine retard 20 mg twice a day in patients with mild or moderate primary arterial hypertension. Both treatments significantly lowered blood pressure with no difference in daily blood pressure profile. At steady state, the two drugs determined comparable plasma levels of nifedipine as measured immediately before the morning dose. After a 12-month treatment, the new formulation of nifedipine still displayed satisfactory blood pressure control in both supine and standing positions, with no change in tolerability throughout the study. In conclusion, this new sustained-release formulation of nifedipine has similar efficacy and tolerability to conventional treatment with nifedipine retard 20 mg twice a day.

Amlodipine versus atenolol in essential hypertension

The efficacy and safety of amlodipine (2.5-10 mg) once daily was compared with atenolol (50-100 mg) once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study. A total of 125 patients were randomly allocated at the end of a 4-week run-in placebo period to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with amlodipine (n = 41), atenolol (n = 43), or placebo (n = 41). The placebo group had small mean changes in supine and standing blood pressure compared with baseline. The mean blood pressure changes from baseline 24 hours postdose in the amlodipine group (mean daily dose 8.8 mg) were -12.8/-10.1 mm Hg for supine blood pressure and -11.5/-9.8 mm Hg for standing blood pressure (p < 0.001 compared with placebo), and for the atenolol group (mean daily dose 83.7 mg) the changes were -11.3/-11.7 mm Hg for supine blood pressure and -13.3/-12.3 mm Hg for standing blood pressure (p < 0.001 compared with placebo). There were no statistically significant blood pressure differences between active treatments. The responder rates for amlodipine, atenolol, and placebo were 61.1, 64.9, and 11.1%, respectively. The blood pressure values taken over the 24-hour period at final visit revealed that amlodipine and atenolol maintained the supine blood pressure < or = 140/90 mm Hg throughout the period of observation; the corresponding time-effect curve for the placebo group was clearly in the hypertensive range. Both amlodipine and atenolol were well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Renal effects of manidipine hydrochloride. A new calcium antagonist in hypertensive patients

The renal effects of manidipine hydrochloride were investigated in ten hospitalised patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a one-week placebo period, manidipine was given for 1 week in a dose rising from 5 mg to 10 mg or 20 mg daily to normalise the mean blood pressure measured after 2 h. Blood pressure had decreased from 171/101 to 147/86 mm Hg at the end of manidipine treatment. The pulse rate was unaltered. Renal vascular resistance decreased from 1.90 to 1.33 dyn.s.cm-5/1.48 m2 x 10(4), and renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate increased from 522 to 662 ml.min-1 x 1.48 m-2 and from 81 to 93 ml.min-1 x 1.48 m-2, respectively, in spite of a fall in renal perfusion pressure. Manidipine reduced the filtration fraction from 0.260 to 0.243, suggesting a preferential reduction in efferent arteriolar resistance. The fractional excretion of sodium and potassium did not change. Manidipine did not produce any significant alteration in plasma renin activity or in the plasma aldosterone concentration. The results indicate that manidipine has favourable renal effects and a concomitant hypotensive action in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

A comparison of the acute hypotensive effects of two different doses of nifedipine

To determine whether a dose of 5 mg of nifedipine would be useful in the treatment of hypertensive emergencies, we compared the acute hypotensive effects of two different doses of nifedipine, 5 mg and 10 mg, in patients with severe hypertension. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 30 consecutive black patients with diastolic blood pressure that was equal to or greater than 115 mm Hg received either a 5 mg or 10 mg nifedipine capsule and a placebo capsule, which matched that of the alternative strength. Patients were asked to bite the capsules and swallow the contents. Blood pressure response over 4 hours and adverse effects were monitored. Mean systolic blood pressure was reduced from 191.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 170.8 to 212.7 mm Hg) to 157.9 mm Hg (137.0 to 178.9 mm Hg) and 206.1 mm Hg (185.1 to 227.0 mm Hg) to 153.7 mm Hg (132.8 to 174.7 mm Hg) in patients who were given 5 mg and 10 mg doses of nifedipine, respectively. Mean diastolic blood pressure in the group of patients that received 5 mg doses of nifedipine decreased from 128.2 mm Hg (115.6 to 140.7 mm Hg) to 105.2 mm Hg (92.7 to 117.7 mm Hg); the corresponding values in the group that received 10 mg doses of nifedipine were 129.9 mm Hg (117.4 to 142.5 mm Hg) and 97.5 mm Hg (85.0 to 110.1 mm Hg), respectively. The minimum mean systolic blood pressures occurred 20 and 25 minutes after administration of the 5 mg and 10 mg capsules, respectively; the minimum diastolic blood pressures were reached after 20 and 30 minutes, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Is sublingual nifedipine administration superior to oral administration in the active treatment of hypertension?

Nifedipine, a calcium-channel-blocking agent, was administered orally to 44 untreated patients (Group A) and sublingually to 51 untreated patients (Group B) who had a diastolic blood pressure more than 90 mm Hg and systolic blood pressure more than 140 mm Hg. The mean pretreatment systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were 185.3 +/- 26.0 and 115.1 +/- 13.4 mm Hg in Group A patients and 193.6 +/- 23.1 and 118.1 +/- 14.1 mm Hg in Group B patients respectively (p greater than 0.05). The hypotensive activity of nifedipine was observed at the tenth minute in both groups. Mean systolic and diastolic pressures were 168.9 +/- 23.7 and 101.9 +/- 14.2 mm Hg in Group A and 170.6 +/- 26.2 and 103.0 +/- 15.8 mm Hg in Group B, (p less than 0.001) Diastolic blood pressures dropped under 100 mm Hg at the twentieth minute in both groups. Maximal reduction of blood pressure was observed at the fortieth minute in both groups and the degree of reduction in blood pressure was also the same (mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures: 143.7 +/- 22.1 and 86.9 +/- 11.7 in Group A and 148.7 +/- 21.4 and 91.7 +/- 17.0 in Group B (p less than 0.05). The authors conclude that sublingual nifedipine administration is not superior to oral nifedipine administration (in capsular form) in the acute treatment of hypertension.

beta blockade and intermittent claudication: placebo controlled trial of atenolol and nifedipine and their combination

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of the beta 1 selective adrenoceptor blocker atenolol, the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine, and the combination of atenolol plus nifedipine on objective and subjective measures of walking performance and foot temperature in patients with intermittent claudication.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled double blind four way crossover trial.

SETTING

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield.

SUBJECTS

49 patients (40 men) aged 39-70 with chronic stable intermittent claudication.

INTERVENTIONS

Atenolol 50 mg twice daily; slow release nifedipine 20 mg twice daily; atenolol 50 mg plus slow release nifedipine 20 mg twice daily; placebo. Each treatment was given for four weeks with no washout interval between treatments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Claudication and walking distances on treadmill; skin temperature of feet as measured by thermistor and probe; blood pressure before and after exercise; subjective assessments of walking difficulty and foot coldness with visual analogue scales.

RESULTS

Atenolol did not significantly alter claudication distance (mean change -6%; 95% confidence interval 1% to -13%), walking distance (-2%; 4% to -8%), or foot temperature. Nifedipine did not alter claudication distance (-4%; 3% to -11%), walking distance (-4%; 3% to -10%), or foot temperature. Atenolol plus nifedipine did not alter claudication distance but significantly reduced walking distance (-9%; -3% to -15% (p less than 0.003)) and skin temperature of the more affected foot (-1.1 degrees C; 0 to -2.2 degrees C (p = 0.05)). These effects on walking distance and foot temperature seemed unrelated to blood pressure changes.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of adverse or beneficial effects of atenolol or nifedipine, when given singly, on peripheral vascular disease. The combined treatment, however, affected walking ability and foot temperature adversely. This may have been due to beta blockade plus reduced vascular resistance, which might also explain the reported adverse effects of pindolol and labetalol on claudication.

Effects of nifedipine on renal responses to several diuretic agents in rats

The influence of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nifedipine has been studied on the diuretic response to frusemide, acetazolamide and hydrochlorothiazide in water-loaded (25 mL kg-1) conscious rats. Oral administration of nifedipine (10 mg kg-1) markedly inhibited frusemide- and hydrochlorothiazide-induced diuresis as evidenced by a reduction in 5 h urine volume and urinary sodium and potassium elimination. However, it neither significantly enhanced nor limited urine and electrolyte excretion promoted by acetazolamide. Nifedipine, 5 and 10 mg kg-1 but not 1 mg kg-1, significantly (P less than 0.05) inhibited the diuretic response of hydrochlorothiazide. At doses which affect hydrochlorothiazide diuresis (5 and 10 mg kg-1), nifedipine was found to depress the mean arterial pressure by 32% in normotensive rats. These results are of interest in view of the often reported clinical side effect of nifedipine in promoting peripheral oedema in hypertensive patients and its use in combination with a thiazide or loop diuretic.

The interactions between nisoldipine and two beta-adrenoceptor antagonists--atenolol and propranolol

1. The interactions between the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nisoldipine and two beta-adrenoceptor blocker drugs (atenolol and propranolol) were investigated in two groups of healthy normotensive subjects. 2. The steady state plasma concentrations of both beta-adrenoceptor blockers were significantly altered by the addition of nisoldipine: for propranolol there were significant increases in Cmax, by about 50%, and in AUC by about 30% and for atenolol there was a significant increase in Cmax, by about 20%. 3. The addition of nisoldipine was also associated with significant changes in apparent liver blood flow (measured by indocyanine green clearance) from 1.4 to 2.4 l min-1 in the atenolol group and from 1.3 to 2.3 l min-1 in the propranolol group. 4. Both nisoldipine-beta-adrenoceptor blocker combinations were associated with small enhanced blood pressure reductions e.g. from 104/60 with atenolol alone to 98/50 mm Hg with the combination but there was no alteration to the extent of beta-adrenoceptor blockade (as assessed by bicycle ergometry). 5. This pharmacodynamic profile in healthy normotensives is consistent with the known therapeutic efficacy of such combination treatments in patients with hypertension and angina. 6. It is suggested that there is a pharmacokinetic component to the efficacy of this type of combination, perhaps reflecting vasodilator-induced changes in drug absorption and/or hepatic extraction.

Calcium antagonists: an overview

Calcium antagonists reduce the influx of calcium ions through the calcium channels. This causes a reduction in myocardial contractility or a fall in vascular resistance because of a lowering of vascular smooth muscle tone. Therefore, the net effect is a fall in blood pressure. The three major classes of calcium antagonists, the dihydropyridines, papaverine derivatives, and benzothiazepines, differ in molecular structure and their binding characteristics to the calcium channels. Furthermore, newer antagonists, particularly the dihydropyridines such as nicardipine, have a high affinity for vascular tissue and are highly selective for vascular smooth muscle. These compounds also have a favorable effect on hypertension mainly because of lowering of vascular resistance. In addition, they do not cause potentially negative metabolic effects on glucose or lipid levels and are generally well tolerated. Based on these findings, the Joint National Committee in the United States and the World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension Committee on the Management of Mild Hypertension recommended the use of calcium antagonists as first-line treatment in hypertension.

Sustained release nifedipine formulations. An appraisal of their current uses and prospective roles in the treatment of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disorders

Nifedipine antagonises influx of calcium through cell membrane slow channels, and sustained release formulations of the calcium channel blocker have been shown to be effective in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and both stable and variant angina pectoris. Preliminary findings also indicate that these formulations are effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon and hypertension in pregnancy, and that they reduce the frequency of ischaemic episodes in some patients with silent myocardial ischaemia. The exact mechanism of action of nifedipine in all of these disorders has not been defined. However, its potent peripheral and coronary arterial dilator properties, together with improvements in oxygen supply/demand, are of particular importance. A major goal of sustained release therapy is to permit reductions in the frequency of nifedipine administration, preferably to once daily, and thus improve patient compliance. Two new once-daily formulations--the nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and a fixed combination capsule comprising sustained release nifedipine 20 mg and atenolol 50 mg--have exhibited marked antihypertensive efficacy. The GITS preparation has also been used effectively in the treatment of stable angina pectoris, and both formulations appear to be well tolerated. Sustained release nifedipine formulations are generally better tolerated than their conventionally formulated counterparts, particularly with regard to reflex tachycardia. Adverse effects seem to be dose related, are mainly associated with the drug's potent vasodilatory action, and include headache, flushing and dizziness. Generally, these effects are mild to moderate in severity and transient, usually diminishing with continued treatment. Thus, sustained release nifedipine formulations are useful and established cardiovascular therapeutic agents which have demonstrable efficacy in various forms of angina, mild to moderate hypertension and Raynaud's phenomenon. Further, promising results shown by the nifedipine GITS formulation, with its advantage of once daily administration suggest that it is likely to become one of the preferred nifedipine formulations for the treatment of hypertension and the various forms of angina.

Dietary sodium intake: influence on calcium channels and urinary calcium excretion in spontaneously hypertensive rats

Binding of the 1,4-dihydropyridine [3H]PN200 110 was employed as an index of cardiac Ca2+ channels in normotensive (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats during 4 weeks of normal (0.73% NaCl) and high (8% NaCl) sodium diets when the rats were between 20 and 24 weeks of age. Binding site density was not different at the beginning of the study but was increased significantly (P less than 0.01) after 1 week in the SHR on a high sodium diet; this difference was not apparent at 2, 3 or 4 weeks of the diet. During this same period, the urinary Ca2+ excretion in SHR was enhanced significantly (P less than 0.01) and the urinary calcium/sodium ratio was elevated during the high sodium intake period.

Nitrendipine and the humoral control of sodium homeostasis

1. Nine healthy volunteers received 10 mg nitrendipine or placebo orally in random order. 2. In the subsequent 5 h urinary sodium excretion was 20% higher after nitrendipine, without any significant difference between the volume of urine excreted after nitrendipine or placebo. Mean blood pressure fell by 5 mm Hg (P less than 0.001), and mean heart rate increased by 5 beats min-1 (P less than 0.01) after nitrendipine but did not change after placebo. 3. These changes were accompanied by a significant elevation in plasma renin activity (P less than 0.001). A fall in plasma aldosterone following placebo appeared to be attenuated by nitrendipine. Plasma noradrenaline increased to a peak 3 h after nitrendipine administration (P less than 0.05) but did not change following placebo. A fall in the excretion of 6-keto PGF1 alpha following placebo was attenuated by nitrendipine. The total excretion of 6-keto PGF1 alpha after nitrendipine was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than after placebo but not difference in the total excretion of PGE2 was detected. Nitrendipine did not affect urinary kallikrein excretion. 4. The natriuretic action of nitrendipine is not mediated by the kallikrein-kinin system, but may be related to changes in renal prostaglandins.

Acute effects of antihypertensive agents on cerebral blood flow in hypertensive rats

The acute effects of various antihypertensive agents on cerebral blood flow and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were studied in anesthetized (amobarbital 100 mg/kg) spontaneously hypertensive rats. Cerebral blood flow in the cortex and thalamus was measured by the hydrogen clearance method before and during a 60-min i.v. infusion of calcium antagonist (nifedipine), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril) or beta-blocker (propranolol). Nifedipine, 30 or 150 micrograms/kg per h, decreased dose dependently the MAP by 20 or 31%, and concomitantly increased cortical blood flow by 28 or 74%, and thalamic blood flow by 51 or 64%, respectively. Captopril, 10 or 100 mg/kg per h, decreased MAP by 7 or 14%, but changed cerebral blood flow minimally. In contrast, propranolol, 1.0 or 5.0 mg/kg per h, decreased MAP by 13 or 11%, with a concomitant reduction of cortical and thalamic blood flow by 20 or 15 and 33 or 37%, respectively. It is concluded that the changes in cerebral blood flow in response to hypotension are varied by antihypertensive drugs depending on the direct or indirect effect of the drugs (dilatation or constriction) on cerebral vessels. Nifedipine seems to dilate while propranolol constricts cerebral vessels.

Negative inotropic effect of intravenous nifedipine in coronary artery disease: relation to plasma levels

The relative extent of the vasodilator versus direct negative inotropic effects of nifedipine was studied in 15 male patients with documented coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular function. At the time of diagnostic cardiac catheterization, three groups of five patients received dose of 1, 2, and 3 mg intravenous nifedipine at a rate of 0.33 mg/min. Hemodynamic measurements and blood collections were made before, during, and every 5 minutes for 30 minutes after infusion of nifedipine. Heart rate increased and mean arterial pressure decreased significantly after the 2 and 3 mg doses of nifedipine. Systemic vascular resistance was significantly decreased and cardiac index increased after all doses of nifedipine. Maximal left ventricular dp/dt (dp/dtmax) was significantly decreased after the 3 mg infusion. The reduction in dp/dtmax was most consistent with a reduction in left ventricular contractility as opposed to changes in loading conditions. Plasma concentrations of nifedipine were significantly correlated with bidirectional changes in dp/dtmax (r = 0.86). Nifedipine concentrations below 28.2 ng/ml were associated with a rise in dp/dtmax, whereas concentrations above that level were associated with a reduction in dp/dtmax. These data indicate that intravenous nifedipine produces dose- and concentration-dependent depression of myocardial contractility in patients with coronary artery disease. Nifedipine concentrations associated with negative inotropic effects are readily achievable with common oral and sublingual doses.

Isradipine in hypertension

Calcium antagonists, particularly those derived from the dihydropyridine class, have shown remarkable efficacy in the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders. This review will concentrate on the use of one of the newer compounds in this category, isradipine, in the treatment of arterial hypertension. Isradipine is a calcium antagonist with marked vascular selectivity and, in practical terms, is devoid of cardiac effects. Its usefulness in hypertension is well documented, both when used as single drug treatment and in combination with other agents, particularly beta-blockers. Isradipine is well tolerated, does not cause metabolic disturbances and, apart from the typical dihydropyridine-type vascular adverse effects, e.g. flushing and ankle oedema, it does not cause any specific side effect. Some results obtained with isradipine in animal studies, e.g. the antiatherosclerotic effect and the brain tissue preserving effect seen in experimental stroke, appear to hold great promise for future important clinical applications for isradipine.

Central neurochemical effects of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists

Recent advances in central dihydropyridine (DHP)-binding sites are reviewed. DHP-binding sites are pre-synaptically and post-synaptically localized in the brain. The functional role of post-synaptic sites is still unknown, whereas pre-synaptic sites seem to contribute to the control of calcium uptake and of neurotransmitter release. DHP-binding sites may be modualated in physiological (age, sex) and pathological events (hypertension, ischaemia, neurological diseases) or after drug treatments (alcohol, morphine, etc.). The reviewed data suggest new therapeutic implications of DHP calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of other diseases and of drug withdrawal syndrome.

Effects of sublingual administration of nifedipine on arterial pressure, plasma renin activity, and glomerular filtration rate in essential hypertension

Effects of sublingual administration of nifedipine on systemic arterial pressure (BP), plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone level (AL), and serum sodium (Na) and potassium (K) levels, have been determined. A significant decrease was observed in systolic and diastolic blood pressure five minutes after the sublingual administration of nifedipine in 21 patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. Furthermore, in an observation period of six hours, it was also established that the effect of nifedipine on systolic and diastolic blood pressure continued. An increase was observed in glomerular filtration rate, whereas there were no changes in PRA, AL, or serum Na and K levels.

Calcium-channel blockade (nitrendipine) in combination with ACE inhibition (captopril) in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension

The antihypertensive efficacy of a combination of calcium-channel blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in severe primary hypertension is well known, but a synergistic action of this drug combination in mild to moderate primary hypertension is still not established. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with nitrendipine (20 mg) or captopril (100 mg), and of their combination (nitrendipine 10 mg plus captopril 50 mg), in patients suffering from mild to moderate primary hypertension, according to a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. After the first 4-week monotherapy period, both nitrendipine and captopril induced a significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) (p less than 0.001). Furthermore, nitrendipine caused a significant increase in heart rate (HR), while no change in HR was observed in patients treated with captopril. Several side effects were observed, both in the nitrendipine-treated patients (facial flushing, headache, malleolar edema) and in the captopril-treated patients (initial hypotension, dizziness, gastrointestinal disorders). However, these side effects were mild and were well tolerated. In the second combined 4-week therapy period, systolic and diastolic BP of patients treated with 10 mg nitrendipine combined with 50 mg captopril continued to decrease to a degree significantly lower (p less than 0.001) than that observed at the end of the monotherapy period. Simultaneously, no change in HR values occurred when compared to basal values. Furthermore, the incidence and intensity of some side effects observed during the combined therapy period were lower than those of the monotherapy period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Calcium-channel blockers and sodium intake: a controlled study in patients with essential hypertension

Thirteen patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and whose average supine blood pressure with no treatment was 165/104 mmHg were studied as inpatients for 3 consecutive one-week periods on different sodium intakes. On the last day of each dietary period, they received a single, 20-mg nitrendipine tablet and blood pressure was monitored every 10 minutes for 2 hours after drug administration. Nitrendipine significantly lowered blood pressure independently of the level of sodium intake, and the maximum blood-pressure lowering effect was achieved approximately 1 hour after the dose. The blood-pressure lowering effect of nitrendipine was greater on high sodium intake as compared to low sodium intake (p less than 0.02), and it was also greater with higher initial blood pressures. However, the sodium-related effect on blood pressure was, at least in part, independent of the pretreatment blood pressure. These results suggest that calcium antagonists, such as nitrendipine, are effective in reducing blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension and could be drugs of choice in those who are unable to restrict their salt intake.

Increase of plasma atrial natriuretic peptide levels after sublingual administration of nifedipine in essentially hypertensive patients

To see whether the acute natriuretic effect of nifedipine is accompanied by changes in atrial natriuretic peptide levels, a group of eight hypertensive patients were studied. After at least a week of constant sodium intake, placebo or nifedipine (10 mg s.I.) were administered and blood pressure, heart rate, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone and atrial natriuretic peptide plasma levels, urinary sodium, urinary volume and creatinine clearance were monitored for 2 hours. While placebo did not induce changes in any of the above parameters, nifedipine administration was followed by a significant decrease in blood pressure and an increase in urinary sodium, urinary volume and creatinine clearance; these changes were accompanied by a significant rise in atrial natriuretic peptide levels from 19.4 +/- 2.8 pg/ml to a maximum of 23.9 +/- 2.5 pg/ml and 24.1 +/- 2.2 pg/ml (P less than 0.05) at 60 and 90 minutes, respectively. In conclusion, our data do not rule out the possibility that atrial natriuretic peptide participates in the nifedipine-induced increase in sodium and water excretion.

Characterization of calcium channel antagonist binding sites labeled by [3H]nitrendipine in porcine coronary artery and aorta

The receptor sites for dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists in porcine coronary artery were characterized with [3H]nitrendipine (NTD), and were compared with those in the thoracic aorta. Specific [3H]NTD binding in the coronary artery and aorta was saturable, reversible and of high affinity. These sites showed a pharmacological specificity and stereoselectivity characteristic of the receptor sites for dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists. The pharmacological potencies of nitrendipine, nifedipine, nisoldipine, (+)-PN 200-110 and (-)-PN 200-110 in the isolated porcine coronary artery correlated well with their potencies in competing for [3H]NTD binding sites. The Hill coefficients for the competition curves for these antagonists in the porcine coronary artery and aorta were close to one. Verapamil partially inhibited specific [3H]NTD binding in both tissues. The [3H]NTD binding was increased by Mg2+ and Ca2+ but was markedly reduced by EDTA. Thus, the present study has shown that [3H]NTD selectively labels the pharmacologically relevant dihydropyridine receptors in the porcine coronary artery and that there is no significant difference between the binding characteristics of the receptor sites in the coronary artery and aorta of pigs.

Nifedipine and surgical removal of phaeochromocytoma

The management of five patients with phaeochromocytoma undergoing surgical removal is described. Pre-operative preparation with phenoxybenzamine and nifedipine for 7 days before surgery prevented excessive fluctuations in cardiovascular parameters in the peri-operative period and resulted in an uneventful recovery.

Intravenous nicardipine for the treatment of severe hypertension

PURPOSE

Severe hypertension responds to treatment with nifedipine given orally or sublingually. Nicardipine hydrochloride, a water soluble dihydropyridine analogue similar to nifedipine, has less of a negative ionotropic effect and produces less reflex tachycardia than nifedipine. Our purpose was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of intravenous nicardipine in a group of patients with severe hypertension (defined as a supine diastolic blood pressure of more than 120 mm Hg).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with severe hypertension received treatment with intravenous nicardipine. Nicardipine titration was performed using doses of 4 to 15 mg/hour to achieve therapeutic goal (diastolic blood pressure 95 mm Hg or less or decrease in diastolic blood pressure of more than 25 mm Hg). After this therapeutic end-point was reached, patients received maintainance therapy with nicardipine for varying lengths of time: one hour (Group I), six hours (Group II), or 24 hours. When blood pressure control was lost, patients in Groups I and II entered a second maintenance period lasting a maximum of 24 hours. Onset and offset of action of nicardipine at various infusion rates and times of infusion were measured.

RESULTS

Onset time to achieve therapeutic response was rapid at 15 mg/hour (0.31 +/- 0.13 hours) when compared with lower doses (1.11 +/- 0.36 hours at 4 mg/hour; 0.54 +/- 0.09 hours at 5 mg/hour; 0.52 +/- 0.09 hours at 7 to 7.5 mg/hour). Those who showed a therapeutic response received maintenance infusions with nicardipine for one (n = 7), six (n = 6), or 24 (n = 5) hours. Sustained blood pressure control at a constant rate of nicardipine infusion was seen in all patients during the maintenance period. After discontinuation of nicardipine, the time for offset of action (increase in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more) was independent of duration of infusion. Decreases in both systolic and diastolic pressures correlated well with plasma nicardipine levels. Heart rate increased by about 10 beats/minute, but this increase did not correlate with plasma nicardipine levels. Side effects were minimal, consisting of headache and flushing. In seven patients, local phlebitis developed at the site of infusion. This occurred after at least 14 hours of infusion at a single site, and the incidence can probably be reduced by shortening the infusion time at a single site.

CONCLUSION

Nicardipine appears to be a safe and effective drug for intravenous use in the treatment of severe hypertension.

Acute effects of nifedipine on renal electrolyte excretion in normal and hypertensive subjects

The role of renal calcium handling in the hypotensive response to calcium channel blockers has not been investigated previously. The acute vasodilatory effect of calcium channel blockers may be accompanied by changes in renal electrolyte handling that are important in renal electrolyte handling that are important in producing the hypotensive response seen with these agents. Nifedipine has been shown to cause acute and chronic natriuresis and diuresis, which are important in the ability to use nifedipine chronically in essential hypertension. We prospectively investigated the acute effect of 10 mg of nifedipine orally on renal cation handling in normotensive and untreated essential hypertensive subjects during a standard oral water load. At baseline there was no difference between normotensives and hypertensives in serum ionized calcium or magnesium, or in the urinary fractional excretion of these two cations. Oral nifedipine acutely increased the fractional excretion of sodium without changing the fractional excretion of calcium or magnesium. Nifedipine did not alter the serum concentrations of sodium, calcium, or magnesium. Augmented sodium excretion may play a role in the acute hypotensive response to oral nifedipine. The acute hypotensive response does not seem to be caused by altered renal handling of calcium or magnesium. Counterbalancing effects of nifedipine on proximal and distal nephron calcium handling may explain the disassociation of augmented sodium excretion and no net change in calcium excretion.

Treatment of hypertensive crisis in children with nifedipine

We report 31 episodes of hypertensive crises in children, managed with sublingual nifedipine at the following dosages: 10 mg in children with body weight (BW) higher than 20 kg, 5 mg in children with BW between 10 and 20 kg, and 2.5 mg in children with BW below 10 kg. The mean initial blood pressures were 161.41 mm Hg for the systolic pressure (mSBP) and 111.25 mm Hg for the diastolic pressure (mDBP). After nifedipine, both the mSBP and the mDBP decreased, with onset of effect five minutes after dosage and maximum decrease at 60 min (mSBP 134.93 mm Hg, mDBP 79.23 mm Hg, for decreases of 16.4 and 28.7%, respectively), and this effect persisted for 180 min. Blood pressure increased again from min 240 to min 360, yet without reaching the initial levels. One case did not respond to the first dose of nifedipine and required a second one. The effect of nifedipine was more pronounced on the DBP than on the SBP, and greater reductions of both pressures were achieved in the cases with higher initial readings. No side of medication were observed in our patients.

Calcium channel blockers in systemic hypertension

Alterations in transmembrane flux of calcium ions may be playing a role in the pathophysiology of systemic hypertension. Calcium channel blockers have been shown to be effective antihypertensive drugs with excellent safety profiles. They are efficacious in the long term treatment of systemic hypertension in all population subgroups, and have special applicability for treating patients with hypertensive urgencies and individuals with concomitant diseases such as angina pectoris and arrhythmias.

Recent issues in antihypertensive drug therapy

Results of recent large scale treatment trials have demonstrated that aggressive management of high blood pressure prevents progression of mild hypertension to the accelerated or malignant phase and reduces incidence of stroke, congestive heart failure, and left ventricular hypertrophy. These trials mostly have utilized a diuretic-based, stepped-care approach to drug therapy, however, and have not shown a consistent beneficial effect of treatment on coronary heart mortality. In addition, the results of studies such as MRFIT have raised questions about serious risks of diuretic treatment in selected patients. These concerns have led to increased use of nonpharmacologic approaches to lowering blood pressure in patients with mild hypertension, but most patients ultimately require drug therapy. Alternative agents to diuretics now being employed as monotherapy in mild hypertension include beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, alpha-blockers, alpha- and beta-blockers, and, to a lesser extent, centrally-acting sympatholytics and peripheral adrenergic antagonists. Rational use of these agents primarily is based on a careful evaluation of concomitant medical conditions (see Table 3), as well as their mode of action, relative side effects, ease of administration, and cost. Age and race recently have been found to be important determinants of antihypertensive response to agents such as diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and ACE inhibitors (see Table 3) and appreciation of these relative differences may affect drug selection. When these factors are taken into account, an effective and well tolerated regimen can be tailored to the individual patient. It is hoped that aggressive treatment of hypertension in the future will cause a further decline in cardiovascular mortality in the United States.