Beta blockers in combination with class I antiarrhythmic agents

Comparison of the effects of four antiarrhythmic treatments for familial ventricular arrhythmias in Boxers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 4 antiarrhythmic treatment protocols on number of ventricular premature complexes (VPC), severity of arrhythmia, heart rate (HR), and number of syncopal episodes in Boxers with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled clinical trial.

ANIMALS

49 Boxers.

PROCEDURE

Dogs with > 500 VPC/24 h via 24-hour ambulatory ECG (AECG) were treated with atenolol (n = 11), procainamide (11), sotalol (16), or mexiletine and atenolol (11) for 21 to 28 days. Results of pre- and posttreatment AECG were compared with regard to number of VPC/24 h; maximum, mean, and minimum HR; severity of arrhythmia; and occurrence of syncope.

RESULTS

Significant differences between pre- and posttreatment number of VPC, severity of arrhythmia, HR variables, or occurrence of syncope were not observed in dogs treated with atenolol or procainamide. Significant reductions in number of VPC, severity of arrythmia, and maximum and mean HR were observed in dogs treated with mexiletine-atenolol or sotalol; occurrence of syncope was not significantly different between these 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Treatment with sotalol or mexiletine-atenolol was well tolerated and efficacious. Treatment with procainamide or atenolol was not effective.

Drug therapy of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Is there still a role?

This article provides a review of the risks faced by patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the absence of a reversible or transient cause so that the goals of therapy can be clearly defined. The therapeutic approaches that have been proposed to achieve these goals are outlined and evidence comparing these various approaches to therapy is then summarized in order to propose an algorithm for the optimal use of antiarrhythmic drug therapies as primary therapy for selected VT/VF patients. Options for the ancillary uses of antiarrhythmic drug therapies in ICD patients are considered.

Sotalol Is More Powerful Than Propranolol in Suppressing Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias

BACKGROUND: Sotalol has combined type II and type III antiarrhythmic properties. Although the beta-blocking action of sotalol is thought to contribute to its antiarrhythmic actions, few data are available from direct comparative clinical trials with pure beta-blocking drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel study, we have compared the antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of treatment with sotalol vs propranolol in 181 patients with organic heart disease and frequent (>30 ventricular premature complexes [VPCs]/h) repetitive ventricular premature complexes. Eighty-seven were randomized to receive sotalol and 94 received propranolol. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were identical, and the majority of patients had coronary artery disease or hypertensive heart disease. Most patients had a long-standing history (>5 years) of ventricular arrhythmias and, in a significant proportion, antiarrhythmic therapy with other drugs had failed in the past. After withdrawal of all antiarrhythmic drugs and 1 week of placebo, qualified patients were randomized to sotalol (320 mg/day) or propranolol (120 mg/day). patients not achieving adequate response were given higher doses of sotalol (640 mg/day) or propranolol (240 mg/day)At baseline, both groups had comparable frequency of total VPCs/hour (274/h and 255/h for sotalol and propranolol groups, respectively) which was reduced to 71 VPCs/h and 109/VPCs/h, respectively, at the end of phase 1. At final evaluation there was a significantly greater response to sotalol as demonstrated by 80% reduction in VPCs/hour with sotalol compared with only 50% reduction noted in the propranolol group. Adequate therapeutic response was also achieved in a significantly greater percentage of patients on sotalol compared with propranolol (56% vs 29%, P =.02). Sotalol was also superior to propranolol in suppressing the VT events/day during phase 1 (89% vs 78% reduction in VT events/day, P <.05). Sotalol was more effective than propranolol in all subgroups and in patients with heart rate <75 beats per minute. CONCLUSIONS: Sotalol is more powerful than propranolol in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias documented on Holter recordings. The superiority of sotalol appears to be related to its combined class II and class III antiarrhythmic actions.

Efficacy and toxicity of tocainide for the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in Doberman pinschers with occult cardiomyopathy

Tocainide was administered to 23 cardiomyopathic Doberman Pinschers at doses of 15 to 25 mg/kg tid. These doses produced peak (2-hour) serum concentrations of 6.2 to 19.1 mg/L and trough (8-hour) serum concentrations of 2.3 to 11.1 mg/L. Anorexia and gastrointestinal disturbances occurred in 8 dogs (35%) at doses (15.6 to 25.0 mg/kg) that were not different from those (16.0 to 26.0 mg/kg) received by dogs that did not experience toxicity. Doses producing peak serum concentrations that were either greater or less than 14 mg/L were not different. Likewise, doses producing trough values that were either greater or less than 6 mg/L were not different. The mean dose that produced peak serum concentrations of 10 to 13.6 mg/L and trough concentrations of 4.2 to 10.0 mg/L was 17.9 mg/kg, and was associated with anorexia in 4 dogs. Mean peak serum concentrations associated with toxicity (14.4 mg/L) were significantly higher (P = .02) than dogs not experiencing toxicity (11.8 mg/L). Serious adverse effects occurred in 7 of 12 dogs (58%) receiving tocainide for longer than 4 consecutive months. Progressive corneal endothelial dystrophy occurred in 3 dogs. Although a causal effect could not be proven, 6 dogs experienced renal dysfunction during treatment. Drug doses in these 7 dogs were similar to those received by other dogs. At least a 70% reduction of the total numbers of ventricular premature contractions occurred in 80% of dogs treated, and ventricular tachycardia was eliminated in 90% of affected dogs by the time of the first posttreatment Holter recording. Long-term control of ventricular tachyarrhythmias was difficult to achieve in some dogs when the left ventricular shortening fraction was less than approximately 17%.

Efficacy of sotalol guided by programmed electrical stimulation for sustained ventricular arrhythmias secondary to coronary artery disease

Sotalol is a class III antiarrhythmic drug with additional beta-blocker activity that has been shown to be effective in supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Its long-term efficacy for ventricular arrhythmias is not as well described. Patients with documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) who had their clinical arrhythmia inducible at baseline electrophysiologic study received sotalol 320 to 640 mg/day. Repeat programmed stimulation was performed after a minimum of 72 hours while receiving the final dose. Of 28 patients (25 men and 3 women) whose arrhythmias were inducible at baseline, 15 had their arrhythmias suppressed with sotalol. Sotalol had greater success in suppressing arrhythmias in those with VF (8 of 9, 89%) than in those with VT (7 of 19, 37%, p < 0.01). In patients with a history of coronary artery disease but no history of myocardial infarction the arrhythmia was suppressed in 7 of 8 (88%) compared with 8 of 20 (40%, p < 0.05) patients with a history of myocardial infarction. All 15 patients in whom ventricular arrhythmias were suppressed continued to take long-term sotalol, and at a follow-up of 10.3 +/- 6.4 months none has had arrhythmia recurrence. Thus, sotalol is an effective drug for the suppression of ventricular arrhythmias as judged by programmed electrical stimulation. It appears to be more effective in patients in whom the clinical arrhythmia is VF rather than VT.

A consensus report on antiarrhythmic drug use

During the past few years, a number of new antiarrhythmic agents have become available for use in the United States, encainide has been withdrawn from use, and others have had indications for use modified. Therefore, a meeting of arrhythmia specialists was convened in an attempt to develop guidelines for antiarrhythmic therapy. The resultant discussions and guidelines presented in this article address general issues such as the most important antiarrhythmic drug attributes, as well as therapy for particular arrhythmias such as premature ventricular contractions, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular ectopy, and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Sotalol and type IA drugs in combination prevent recurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the efficacy of the combination of sotalol and either quinidine or procainamide in preventing sustained ventricular tachycardia inducibility and recurrence and prospectively evaluated the ability of the drug combination to prevent ventricular tachycardia recurrence when the arrhythmia remained inducible but was modified.

BACKGROUND

Individual antiarrhythmic drugs are often ineffective in preventing the induction and recurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Beta-adrenergic blockade and prolongation of refractoriness may be important components of successful antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia. We reasoned that the combination of sotalol, which has beta-adrenergic blocking properties and prolonged ventricular refractoriness, and quinidine or procainamide, two agents that slow conduction and prolong refractory periods, would be effective therapy in such patients.

METHODS

We administered low dose sotalol (205 +/- 84 mg/day) plus quinidine sulfate (1,278 +/- 479 mg/day) or procainamide (2,393 +/- 1,423 mg/day) to 50 patients with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation and inducible ventricular tachycardia.

RESULTS

In 21 (46%) of 46 patients, ventricular tachycardia was rendered noninducible at electrophysiologic study (group I), and in 17 patients (37%), inducible tachycardia was modified according to prospectively identified criteria (group II), for a combined 83% response rate. Ventricular refractory periods increased from 252 +/- 24 to 316 +/- 28 ms and from 265 +/- 33 to 316 +/- 24 ms in groups I and II, respectively (p < 0.001), but from 234 +/- 19 to only 286 +/- 13 ms in the group of patients with unmodified ventricular tachycardia inducibility (n = 8, group III, p < 0.001). Cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia slowed from 324 +/- 62 to 432 +/- 70 ms in group II patients (p < 0.001), whereas it slowed less in group III patients (279 +/- 73 to 314 +/- 63 ms, p = NS). Forty-two of the 50 patients (including all patients in groups I and II) were discharged on treatment with the drug combination. After 25 +/- 19 months of follow-up, the actuarial recurrence rate of ventricular tachycardia was 6%, 6% and 11% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Among patients in whom this drug combination was unsuccessful at electrophysiologic study (group III) and in those who received alternative therapy after combination therapy was discontinued because of side effects, actuarial recurrence rates were 9%, 14% and 32% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sotalol plus quinidine or procainamide markedly prolongs ventricular refractoriness and slows induced ventricular tachycardia in a high proportion of patients. Patients with modified or noninducible tachycardia have a low rate of arrhythmia recurrence in follow-up. This drug combination deserves further evaluation.

Effect of the combination of low-dose mexiletine and metoprolol on ventricular arrhythmia

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is often ineffective or poorly tolerated. Combining antiarrhythmic agents with different electrophysiologic properties may have a synergistic antiarrhythmic effect when compared with each drug alone. If a lower dose of each drug can be used, combination therapy may also result in lower incidence of side effects. The goal of our study was to assess the complementary effect of low-dose mexiletine and metoprolol, when compared with either drug alone. Ten patients with frequent ventricular arrhythmias including 7 patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were evaluated in an open-label sequential study. The response to drug therapy was evaluated by 24-h continuous EKG monitoring, exercise stress testing, and echocardiogram after each treatment. Combination therapy effectively reduced ventricular arrhythmias in 8 patients (80%) in contrast to only 1 patient (10%) on metoprolol alone and 4 patients (40%) on mexiletine alone. In 5 patients (71%) ventricular tachycardia was abolished. The number of couplets was reduced from 51 +/- 39 to 1.9 +/- 2.4 (p less than 0.01) and total premature ventricular beats from 7790 +/- 9047 to 597 +/- 515 (p = 0.06). Combination therapy was well tolerated without proarrhythmia or precipitation of congestive heart failure. It is concluded that low-dose mexiletine combined with metoprolol is effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias in selected patients, and enhances the antiarrhythmic effect of either drug alone without significant side effects.

Combination antiarrhythmic treatment among class Ia, Ib, and II agents for ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmia suppression trials were performed to compare the efficacies and side effects of disopyramide and mexiletine used alone and in combination, and to compare the efficacies and side effects of mexiletine and propranolol used alone and in combination, in patients with chronic ventricular premature contractions (VPCs, greater than or equal to 3000 beats/day). The study on the combination of disopyramide and mexiletine included 26 patients (19 men and 7 women). Disopyramide 100 mg tid or mexiletine 150 mg tid was administered as single-drug therapy, and disopyramide 50 mg plus mexiletine 100 mg tid was administered as combination therapy. Each patient underwent Holter monitoring during four different periods: baseline, disopyramide alone, mexiletine alone, and combination therapy. The mean number of VPCs/hr at baseline was 796 +/- 522 (mean +/- SD), which was significantly decreased with all three therapies (p less than 0.01 in each) to a) 415 +/- 480 with disopyramide alone, b) 341 +/- 368 with mexiletine alone, and c) 345 +/- 408 with the combination therapy. The number of patients demonstrating a significant reduction in VPCs (greater than or equal to 75%) and the elimination of ventricular tachycardia (VT; three or more consecutive VPCs) did not differ significantly among the three therapies. The prematurity index (PI), vulnerability index (VI), and QTc tended to be aggravated by disopyramide therapy alone, but these values were corrected by combination therapy. No patients withdrew from the study due to side effects during combination therapy, although three patients withdrew from the study due to severe side effects during single-drug therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Role of combination drug therapy with a class IC antiarrhythmic agent and mexiletine for ventricular tachycardia

The combination of mexiletine and a class IC antiarrhythmic agent (encainide, propafenone or flecainide) was evaluated by electrophysiologic testing in 14 patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia whose tachycardia remained inducible during therapy with the class IC drug alone. During the control drug-free state, all patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia, with a mean cycle length of 260 ms (range 190 to 400). During monotherapy with the IC agent the tachycardia remained inducible in each patient, but there was a significant increase in the cycle length to 340 ms (240 to 500) (p less than 0.001). The effective refractory period of the ventricle was not altered. Treatment with mexiletine (oral in 13 and intravenous in 1) was begun and electrophysiologic testing was repeated. Ventricular tachycardia in one patient was rendered noninducible and one patient had arrhythmia aggravation. The tachycardia in the remaining 12 patients remained inducible but its average cycle length increased further to 392 ms (340 to 460) (p = NS). Nine patients had rate slowing and the average cycle length of the ventricular tachycardia in this group was significantly increased (302 to 388 ms, p less than 0.05). The average effective refractory period was significantly increased during combination therapy (267 ms) compared with no drug therapy (235 ms) and therapy with the class IC drug alone (247 ms) (p less than 0.05). After a mean follow-up interval of 22 months, seven patients continue on the combined treatment and have no ventricular tachycardia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Suppressant effects of conventional beta blockers and sotalol on complex and repetitive ventricular premature complexes

Beta-blocking drugs have been shown to reduce the overall mortality and risk of sudden cardiac death in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. It is not known whether such an effect is mediated by suppression of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs). The circadian rhythmicity of ventricular arrhythmia can also be suppressed by beta-blocking drugs, and this may help reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death during the morning hours. Recent studies have also shown that beta blockers can provide a safe and effective combination with class IA antiarrhythmic agents when arrhythmias cannot be controlled with class IA agents alone. Sotalol, a nonselective beta antagonist, has unique electrophysiologic properties, and several studies have shown it to be more effective than conventional beta blockers in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias. However, direct comparative studies of the suppression of VPCs are lacking. In a recent double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study, the antiarrhythmic effects of sotalol and propranolol were compared in 172 patients with greater than 30 VPCs/hour. After the initial 1-week washout and 1-week placebo period, patients were randomly assigned to either 160 mg of sotalol administered twice daily (76 patients) or 40 mg of propranolol administered 3 times daily (91 patients). Those responding to therapy (decreases greater than 75% VPCs) continued to take these doses, but nonresponders were given higher doses, 320 mg of sotalol twice daily or 80 mg of propranolol 3 times daily, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adjuvant xamoterol or metoprolol in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmia resistant to amiodarone

In a randomised cross-over study, six patients with recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) were treated with 3 regimens--amiodarone, amiodarone plus metoprolol, and amiodarone plus xamoterol. All patients had poor left ventricular function and were resistant to multiple drugs. Xamoterol (a partial beta-agonist) was more effective than metoprolol as adjuvant therapy to amiodarone in the control of recurrent sustained ventricular arrhythmias and was not associated with any clinical deterioration of ventricular function. Xamoterol was also more effective than metoprolol for suppression of VT at programmed stimulation and as effective as metoprolol for suppression of VT on exercise. Exercise tolerance was significantly greater during treatment with xamoterol/amiodarone than during treatment with metoprolol/amiodarone or with amiodarone alone.

Combination antiarrhythmic therapy for management of malignant ventricular arrhythmia

The efficacy of combination drug therapy in the suppression of ambient ventricular arrhythmia was retrospectively evaluated in a study of 49 patients discharged from the hospital taking 2 membrane-active antiarrhythmic agents. Thirty-one patients (63%) had ischemic heart disease, 15 had miscellaneous cardiac disorders and 3 were free of ostensible heart disease. Therapy in all patients had previously been unsuccessful with an average of 3.7 single membrane-active drugs. Antiarrhythmic agents were discontinued for at least 48 hours to determine baseline arrhythmia levels by Holter monitoring and maximal exercise treadmill testing. Ventricular premature beats were evaluated according to the grading system of Lown and Wolf. Data on ventricular ectopic activity were obtained during Holter monitoring and exercise testing for both a control ("drug-free") period and for a period of combination therapy. During the control period, ventricular tachycardia was recorded during 23% of monitored hours, and the level was nearly twofold greater during stress testing. After institution of combined therapy, the percent of monitored hours of arrhythmia were reduced during Holter monitoring, with a greater reduction in couplets and ventricular tachycardia than in single ventricular premature beats. Ventricular tachycardia was more difficult to provoke by exercise testing in patients taking combination therapy than in control subjects. These data indicate that combination therapy can significantly reduce the density of ventricular ectopic activity in patients refractory to monotherapy. During an average follow-up of 26 months, 23 patients (47%) were able to receive decreased drug dosages, affording diminished adverse effects and improved tolerance to long-term use.