Response to hepatitis B vaccine in Alaska natives with chronic alcoholism compared with non-alcoholic control subjects

Gastrointestinal and hepatic side effects of potential treatment for COVID-19 and vaccination in patients with chronic liver diseases

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic. Many clinical trials have been performed to investigate potential treatments or vaccines for this disease to reduce the high morbidity and mortality. The drugs of higher interest include umifenovir, bromhexine, remdesivir, lopinavir/ritonavir, steroid, tocilizumab, interferon alpha or beta, ribavirin, fivapiravir, nitazoxanide, ivermectin, molnupiravir, hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine alone or in combination with azithromycin, and baricitinib. Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and liver dysfunction are frequently seen in patients with COVID-19, which can make it difficult to differentiate disease manifestations from treatment adverse effects. GI symptoms of COVID-19 include anorexia, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain. Liver injury can be a result of systemic inflammation or cytokine storm, or due to the adverse drug effects in patients who have been receiving different treatments. Regular monitoring of liver function should be performed. COVID-19 vaccines have been rapidly developed with different technologies including mRNA, viral vectors, inactivated viruses, recombinant DNA, protein subunits and live attenuated viruses. Patients with chronic liver disease or inflammatory bowel disease and liver transplant recipients are encouraged to receive vaccination as the benefits outweigh the risks. Vaccination against COVID-19 is also recommended to family members and healthcare professionals caring for these patients to reduce exposure to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus.

Use of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with liver disease and post-liver transplantation: Position statement of the Saudi association for the study of liver diseases and transplantation

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and liver transplant recipients are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although several studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in the general population, data in CLD patients and liver transplant recipients are lacking. Two COVID-19 vaccines were approved by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority and rolled out to several million recipients in Saudi Arabia. These vaccines are mRNA-based vaccine BNT162b2 from Pfizer/BioNTech and adenovirus-based AZD1222 from Oxford/AstraZeneca from three manufacturing sites (EU Nodes, Serum Institute of India, and South Korea Bio). The Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation (SASLT) has reviewed the available evidence and issued interim recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination in CLD and liver transplant recipients. Since there is no evidence contradicting the safety and immunogenicity of the currently approved COVID-19 vaccines in patients with CLD and hepatobiliary cancer and liver transplant recipients, the SASLT recommends vaccination in those patient populations. CLD and hepatobiliary cancer patients and liver transplant recipients should be prioritized depending on the risk factors for severe COVID-19. In transplant recipients, the optimal timing of vaccination remains unknown; however, immunization is recommended after the initial immunosuppression phase. Patients with CLD and liver transplant candidates or recipients should be closely monitored after COVID-19 vaccination. These patient populations should be included in future clinical trials to provide further evidence on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

EASL position paper on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with chronic liver diseases, hepatobiliary cancer and liver transplant recipients

According to a recent World Health Organization estimate, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, which originated in China in 2019, has spread globally, infecting nearly 100 million people worldwide by January 2021. Patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD), particularly cirrhosis, hepatobiliary malignancies, candidates for liver transplantation, and immunosuppressed individuals after liver transplantation appear to be at increased risk of infections in general, which in turn translates into increased mortality. This is also the case for SARS-CoV-2 infection, where patients with cirrhosis, in particular, are at high risk of a severe COVID-19 course. Therefore, vaccination against various pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, administered as early as possible in patients with CLD, is an important protective measure. However, due to impaired immune responses in these patients, the immediate and long-term protective response through immunisation may be incomplete. The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to the exceptionally fast development of several vaccine candidates. A small number of these SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates have already undergone phase III, placebo-controlled, clinical trials in healthy individuals with proof of short-term safety, immunogenicity and efficacy. However, although regulatory agencies in the US and Europe have already approved some of these vaccines for clinical use, information on immunogenicity, duration of protection and long-term safety in patients with CLD, cirrhosis, hepatobiliary cancer and liver transplant recipients has yet to be generated. This review summarises the data on vaccine safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in this patient population in general and discusses the implications of this knowledge on the introduction of the new SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Vaccine-preventable diseases other than tuberculosis, and homelessness: A scoping review of the published literature, 1980 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Homelessness may result in the breakdown of regular health services, including routine vaccination programmes. A scoping review was conducted to describe vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD) other than tuberculosis in people experiencing homelessness (PEH).

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We searched peer-reviewed literature published in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese reporting the outbreak of VPD or VPD prevalence in both infant and adult homeless populations published between 1980 and 2020, using PubMed/Medline, SciELO, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases. Relevant information from the studies was charted in Microsoft Excel and results were summarised using a descriptive analytical method.

RESULTS

Eighty-one articles were included. A high prevalence of past hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis A virus (HAV) infections were observed through serosurveys, mostly in high income countries or high-middle income countries (USA, Canada, France, Iran or Brazil). Ten outbreaks of HAV infection were also reported, with lethality rates ranging from 0 to 4.8%. The studies identified numerous risk factors positively associated with HBV infection, including older age, homosexual or bisexual practice, injected drug use (IDU), and, with HAV infection including IDU, having sexual partner(s) with a history of unspecified hepatitis, insertive anal penetration, or originating from a country with a high prevalence of anti-HAV antibody. Eleven outbreaks of pneumococcal infection affecting PEH were reported in Canada and USA, with lethality rates from 0 to 15.6%. Six diphtheria outbreaks were reported. Vaccination status was rarely documented in these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature suggests that homeless populations generally experience a high VPD burden suggesting the need for a national vaccination programme and planning for delivering vaccines in this population.

[Response to hepatitis B vaccine in alcoholics without clinically evident liver cirrhosis]

BACKGROUND

Alcoholics have higher prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection than non-alcoholics and such fact may influence in the development of liver cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM

To evaluate the response to hepatitis B vaccine in alcoholics without liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Twenty male alcoholics with mean age of 46.6 +/- 10.9 years were vaccinated; they ingested more than 80 g of ethanol/day for more than 10 years. As control group 40 male non-alcoholics with mean age of 37.8 +/- 9.7 years were also vaccinated. No serological evidence of contact with HBV, hepatitis C virus or human immunodeficiency virus was found among the subjects of both groups. The vaccine Euvax B (20 microg) was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid area at 0, 1 and 6 months. Serum anti-HBs were determined after one month of the last dose. Levels <10 mUI/mL were considered as non-response, between 10 and 99 mUI/mL as seroconversion, and > or = 100 mUI/mL as seroprotection.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between alcoholics and controls, respectively, in the frequency of non-response (35.0% vs 32.5%), seroconversion (15.0% vs 15.0%) and seroprotection (50.0% vs 52.5%). Among responders, mean levels of anti-HBs in alcoholics (511 +/- 448 mUI/mL) were similar to the controls (696 +/- 410 mUI/mL). No negative interference on the response was associated with the body mass index, tabagism, being drinking or concurrent chronic pancreatitis without pancreatic insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Male alcoholics without liver cirrhosis had similar frequency and serum levels of anti-HBs to the non-alcoholics in response to HBV vaccination.

Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis B and C virus infections in Asia

The present paper provides a review of the current literature regarding the molecular-based epidemiology of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), which are very important viruses underlying the etiology of blood-borne infectious diseases worldwide. Particularly, both HBV and HCV are widespread on the Asian continent and are associated with acute and chronic liver diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV has been classified into genotypes A through G and shown to have a distinct geographic distribution. In Asia, genotypes B and C of HBV prevail, and genotype C has been shown to cause more serious liver disease than genotype B. High prevalence of HBV mutants with various forms, such as the pre-S mutant, basal core promoter mutant, YMDD motif mutant and vaccine escape mutant, were seen in Asia and these were found to be related to the severity of liver disease and sensitivity to therapy. HCV has also been classified into multiple genotypes and associated with geographic distribution. HCV genotype 1 is less sensitive to interferon therapy and may be associated with the presence of more serious liver disease than the other genotypes. Data on the relation among the HBV/HCV genotypes, their pathogenicity in chronic liver diseases including hepatocellular carcinoma and their effect on therapy are awaited with great interest, especially in Asia, which is an endemic region of blood-borne hepatitis viruses.

Immunogenicity of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in Alaska Native chronic alcoholics compared with nonalcoholic Native and non-Native controls

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the immunogenicity of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in Alaska Native chronic alcoholics and compare these responses with those in age- and sex-matched nonalcoholic, Native and non-Native control subjects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Native alcoholic patients were recruited from the inpatient medical service and outpatient clinics. Healthy age- and sex-matched Alaska Native and non-Native nonalcoholics were recruited from hospital employees. At the initial visit, a standardized questionnaire, the Alcohol Dependency Scale, was administered to all participants. Participants were examined for liver diseases; blood was drawn for liver function tests and prevaccination pneumococcal antibody levels. Charts of all Native participants were reviewed for alcohol-related diseases. Participants received one dose of the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine at the time of the initial visit and returned 20 to 55 days after immunization for liver function tests and pneumococcal antibody level measurement. Serotype-specific pneumococcal antibody levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the proportion of persons whose serotype-specific antibody level doubled following vaccination. A model including adjustments for age, sex, and initial antibody level was used to examine the effect of alcohol status and ethnicity on response to the vaccine. Eighty-five persons completed the study. Of these, 41 were chronic alcoholics and 44 were nonalcoholic. Of these, 21 were Alaska Natives and 23 were non-Natives.

RESULTS

Before vaccination, the geometric mean titers (GMTs) were similar in all 3 groups but were slightly higher in Native alcoholic participants for 11 of 12 serotypes tested. For 11 or more serotypes tested, 46% of alcoholics and 27% of nonalcoholics had total antibody levels at or above 500 nanograms of antibody nitrogen per milliliter (p = 0.11). After vaccination, the GMTs were higher in nonalcoholic than in alcoholic participants for serotypes 3, 7F, and 19F (p < 0.05). When Natives and non-Natives were compared, non-Natives had higher antibody levels than Native participants for 10 of 12 serotypes. After vaccination, 83% of alcoholics and 91% of nonalcoholics had pneumococcal antibody levels of more than 500 nanograms of antibody nitrogen per milliliter for at least 11 serotypes. When responses consisting of a twofold or greater increase in antibody level were compared, a greater proportion of nonalcoholics than alcoholics responded to serotypes 3, 4, 7F, 8, and 19F. This difference was significant for types 3 and 19F only (p < 0.05). In alcoholics there was a direct correlation between pneumococcal antibody level and age both before and after vaccination. This was significant before vaccination for serotypes 4, 6B, 18C, and 23F, and after vaccination for these types and for types 1 and 19F. In nonalcoholics there was a correlation between age and antibody response, following vaccination, for serotype 9N and 18C. Alcoholic males had antibody levels higher than that in females for most serotypes, but significantly so only for serotype 12F before vaccination, and for type 14 after vaccination. There were no sex differences seen among nonalcoholics, and no differences in response to vaccine could be detected in patients with or without liver dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

In this study of Alaska Natives with chronic alcoholism, Native and non-Native participants responded adequately to immunization with the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, although significant differences in some serotypes were evident.

[The hepatitis B virus in alcoholic liver disease: its clinical and biochemical assessment]

The aim of our work was to study the prevalence of HBV markers in Alcoholic Liver Disease (ALD) by evaluating clinical and biochemical parameters that could further characterize the association. A prospective and sequential study of 107 patients with ALD was performed, including 83 cases of cirrhosis and 24 cases of alcoholic hepatitis. Daily ingestion of pure ethanol was of at least 70 gm for seven years or more and always associated with hepatocellular disfunction. According to the serological profile for HBV markers the patients were allocated to one of four groups: group I infected (positivity of HBsAg and anti-HBc); group II immunized (positivity of anti-HBs and anti-HBc); group III without HBV markers (negativity of HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs); group IV isolated anti-HBc. The prevalence of HBsAg positivity in ALD was high: 15.89% whereas immunity was low: 26.17% suggesting a great exposure to the virus and a deficient immunological response. No significant statistical differences were found among the three groups when clinical and biochemical parameters were individually considered. Nevertheless, when a Child/Campbell classification was applied, patients with ALD associated with HBV (group I) showed a significant difference, presenting a predominance of child C, with a bad prognosis.

Modern approach to alcoholic liver disease

The pathogenesis of alcoholic liver disease is unclear. The recent literature on pathogenic factors, including direct effects of ethanol and its proximate metabolite acetaldehyde, associated nutritional factors, the formation of acetaldehyde-protein adducts, associated immune alterations, and the potential for liver injury due to coexisting hepatitis virus infection, is highlighted. The therapy of patients with advanced alcoholic liver injury, especially alcoholic hepatitis, is also controversial. It seems reasonable that all patients should receive adequate nutrition even if parenteral or enteral supplementation is required. Corticosteroid administration may benefit those patients with alcoholic hepatitis who have coexisting spontaneous hepatic encephalopathy and no gastrointestinal bleeding. For patients with complications from end-stage alcoholic cirrhosis, liver transplantation should be considered, as the patient with alcoholic cirrhosis does as well after liver transplantation as those patients with other forms of end-stage liver disease.