Stimulation of cyclic adenosine 3', 5'-monophosphate in chick cerebral hemisphere slices: effects of H1 and H2 histaminergic agonists and antagonists

Histamine H(2) -like receptors in chick cerebral cortex: effects on cyclic AMP synthesis and characterization by [(3) H]tiotidine binding

In this study, histamine (HA) receptors in chick cerebral cortex were characterized using two approaches: (1) analysis of the effects of HA-ergic drugs on the cAMP-generating system, and (2) radioreceptor binding of [(3) H]tiotidine, a selective H(2) antagonist. HA was a weak activator of adenylyl cyclase in a crude membrane preparation of chick cerebrum. On the other hand, HA (0.1-1000 microm) potently and concentration dependently stimulated cAMP production in [(3) H]adenine pre-labelled slices of chick cerebral cortex, displaying an EC(50) value (concentration that produces 50% of maximum response) of 2.65 microm. The effect of HA was mimicked by agonists of HA receptors with the following rank order of potency: HA >or= 4-methylHA (H(2)) >or= N alpha,N alpha-dimethylHA (H(3) >> H(2) = H(1)) >> 2-methylHA (H(1)) >> 2-thiazolylethylamine (H(1)) >or= R alpha-methylHA (H(3)) >> amthamine, dimaprit (H(2)), immepip (H(3), H(4)). The HA-evoked increase in cAMP production in chick cerebral cortex was antagonized by selective H(2) receptor blockers (aminopotentidine >or= tiotidine > ranitidine >> zolantidine), and not significantly affected by mepyramine and thioperamide, selective H(1) and H(3) /H(4) receptor blockers, respectively. A detailed analysis of the antagonistic action of aminopotentidine (vs. HA) revealed a non-competitive mode of action. The binding of [(3) H]tiotidine to chick cortical membranes was rapid, stable and reversible. Saturation analysis resulted in a linear Scatchard plot, suggesting binding to a single class of receptor binding site with high affinity [equilibrium dissociation constant (K (d)) = 4.42 nm] and high capacity [maximum number of binding sites (B (max) ) = 362 fmol/mg protein]. The relative rank order of HA-ergic drugs to inhibit [(3) H]tiotidine binding to chick cerebrum was: antagonists - tiotidine >> aminopotentidine = ranitidine >or= zolantadine >> thioperamide - triprolidine; agonists - HA >or= 4-methylHA >> 2-methylHA >or=R alpha-methylHA - dimaprit. In conclusion, chick cerebral cortex contains H(2) -like HA receptors that are linked to the cAMP-generating system and are labelled with [(3) H]tiotidine. The pharmacological profile of these receptors is different from that described for their mammalian counterpart. It is suggested that the studied receptors represent either an avian-specific H(2) -like HA receptors or a novel subtype of HA receptors.

Histamine-stimulated cyclic AMP formation in the chick pineal gland: role of protein kinase C

The role of protein kinase C (PKC) in histamine (HA)-stimulated cyclic AMP formation in intact chick pineal glands was investigated. In the pineal gland of chick HA, 2-methylHA, 4-methylHA, and N alpha, N alpha-dimethylHA potently increased cyclic AMP accumulation in a concentration-dependent manner. Treatment of intact glands with PKC inhibitors, i.e. chelerythrine and stautosporine, reduced the stimulatory effect of the HA-ergic compounds on cyclic AMP formation. HA, 2-methylHA, 4-methylHA, and N alpha, N alpha-dimethylHA significantly increased inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) levels in intact chick pineal glands, indicating their activities on phospholipase C and 1,2-diacylglycerol formation. The stimulatory effect of HA on IP3 levels was antagonized by aminopotentidine, a potent blocker of H2-like HA receptors in avian pineal gland. Preincubation of chick pineal glands with a PKC activator, 4 beta-phorbol 12, 13-dibutyrate (4 beta-PDB), enhanced the accumulation of cyclic AMP elicited by HA, 2-methylHA, 4-methylHA, and N alpha, N alpha-dimethylHA. On the other hand, 4 beta-phorbol, inactive on the PKC, was ineffective. Our results point to the possibility that PKC is involved in the regulation by HA of cyclic AMP synthesis in the pineal gland of chick. Furthermore, the cyclic AMP response to pineal HA receptor stimulation can be positively modulated by a concomitant activation of the PKC pathway.

A bizarre receptor mediating stimulatory effect of histamine on cyclic AMP formation in duck pineal gland

In agreement with our previous findings in chick pineal, histamine also appeared to be a potent stimulator of cAMP formation in intact duck pineal gland (about ten-fold increase above control at 100 microM), showing an EC50 value of 3-5 microM. The effect of histamine in the duck pineal was mimicked by several histaminergic drugs, with the following order of potency: histamine = 4-methylhistamine > 2-methylhistamine > R-alpha-methylhistamine > amthamine > 2-thiazolylethylamine = immepip > imetit > dimaprit. The effect of 100 microM histamine was unaffected by H1-, H2- and H3-receptor selective antagonists, mepyramine, ranitidine and thioperamide, respectively; yet, two other H2-antagonists, aminopotentidine and tiotidine, reduced the histamine effect by only 40%. Thus, these results, being in line with our previous chick data, give support to a suggestion that histamine may be considered a modulator of the pineal activity, and that the avian pineal may contain a novel or avian-specific histamine receptor modulating cAMP formation, whose pharmacology is different from that typical for H1-, H2-, or H3-type receptor.

Histamine: correlative studies in nucleus accumbens

The role of histamine as a neurotransmitter has been the subject of considerable controversy. Recent evidence suggests it to be involved in such complex activities as arousal and affect. The purpose of the present study is to examine the possible source, function, and pharmacology of histamine in the nucleus accumbens, an area of the brain also implicated in complex activities such as affect. The anatomical studies suggest that the most probable source of the histamine in nucleus accumbens is the complex region lateral to the mammillary nuclei. These areas are the intercalated nucleus and the tuberomammillary nucleus (nuclei gemini hypothalami). To a lesser degree, the supramammillary complex may also contribute histamine-containing axons to the accumbens area. Adenylate cyclase in the rabbit nucleus accumbens displayed activation in response to histamine agonists (histamine, 2-Me-histamine, and 4-Me-histamine). The action of the H1 antagonist promethazine was greater than the H2 antagonist metiamide in reducing enzyme activation by histamine and 2-Me-histamine. In contrast, metiamide was more potent than promethazine toward antagonism of the action of 4-Me-histamine. However, no additive effects were noted when agonists were added in combination. Based upon these data, it is suggested that activation of adenylate cyclase in the rabbit nucleus accumbens is mediated in part by mixed H1 and H2 receptors or cellular disruption reflects the loss of receptor specificity. Physiological studies demonstrated that the H2 agonist 4-Me-histamine had an inhibitory effect on the activity of neurons driven by stimulation of the fimbria. The magnitude of the effect was frequency dependent. The H1 agonist 2-Me-histamine had no significant effect. Iontophoretic application of 4-Me-histamine had minimal effect upon low frequency volleys (0.5 Hz) but had a pronounced effect upon higher frequency volleys (6.0 Hz). These effects were antagonized by metiamide. Iontophoretic application of metiamide alone produced an effect only upon the P component of the field response, which is also bicuculline sensitive. Bicuculline coadministration was also effective in antagonizing the 4-Me-histamine effect. The physiological data suggest that histamine works through H2 receptors in nucleus accumbens, perhaps by potentiating the effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Thus, histamine in nucleus accumbens appears to function as a modulatory substance whose effect is dependent upon the activity of other transmitter and afferent systems.

Binding of [3H]cimetidine to rat brain tissue

Binding of [3H]cimetidine to rat brain tissue was investigated, and a saturable binding with dissociation constant 0.22 +/- 0.05 microM found. This binding is inhibited by a range of imidazole-derived histamine H2-receptor antagonists, but not by a number of non-imidazole H2-receptor antagonists. It is concluded that the [3H]cimetidine binding site in rat brain tissue that is labelled in these experiments is not the histamine H2-receptor.

Are histamine H2-receptor depressions of neuronal activity in tissue cultures from rat hypothalamus mediated through cyclic adenosine monophosphate?

Iontophoretic application of histamine H2-agonists depressed spontaneous firing of tuberal hypothalamic neurons in tissue culture. Perfusion with inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase increased the strength of these depressions, which persisted during perfusion with Ca2+-free medium. These results support a role of cyclic AMP as a mediator of histamine H2-elicited depressions of neuronal activity.

Relationship between histamine-induced changes of cyclic AMP and mechanical activity on smooth muscle preparations of the guinea-pig ileum and the rabbit mesenteric artery

On guinea-pig ileum and rabbit mesenteric artery contracted by high potassium (100 mM) histamine produced relaxations which were inhibited by the H2-receptor antagonist metiamide. These results are thus indicative for the role of H2-receptors in mediating relaxation and for H1-receptors in mediating contraction on smooth muscle. Time course studies for the relaxing and cyclic AMP responses to histamine showed that the cyclic AMP increase preceded the H2-receptor mediated relaxation. The cyclic AMP increase in response to histamine was prevented by metiamide, but remained unaffected by mepyramine on both the guinea-pig ileum and the rabbit mesenteric artery. In addition, dose-response curves obtained on the mesenteric artery demonstrated that the H2-receptor mediated depressor responses coincided with cyclic AMP increases. Thus, these results gave clear-cut evidence that cyclic AMP is an intracellular metabolic event only implicit in the H2-receptor mediated relaxation, but not in the H1-receptor mediated contraction on smooth muscle preparations.