Spinal release of immunoreactive dynorphin A(1-8) with the development of peripheral inflammation in the rat

Dynorphin and Enkephalin Opioid Peptides and Transcripts in Spinal Cord and Dorsal Root Ganglion During Peripheral Inflammatory Hyperalgesia and Allodynia

Understanding molecular alterations associated with peripheral inflammation is a critical factor in selectively controlling acute and persistent pain. The present report employs in situ hybridization of the 2 opioid precursor mRNAs coupled with quantitative measurements of 2 peptides derived from the prodynorphin and proenkephalin precursor proteins: dynorphin A 1-8 and [Met⁵]-enkephalin-Arg⁶-Gly⁷-Leu⁸. In dorsal spinal cord ipsilateral to the inflammation, dynorphin A 1-8 was elevated after inflammation, and persisted as long as the inflammation was sustained. Qualitative identification by high performance liquid chromatography and gel permeation chromatography revealed the major immunoreactive species in control and inflamed extracts to be dynorphin A 1-8. In situ hybridization in spinal cord after administration of the inflammatory agent, carrageenan, showed increased expression of prodynorphin (Pdyn) mRNA somatotopically in medial superficial dorsal horn neurons. The fold increase in preproenkephalin mRNA (Penk) was comparatively lower, although the basal expression is substantially higher than Pdyn. While Pdyn is not expressed in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in basal conditions, it can be induced by nerve injury, but not by inflammation alone. A bioinformatic meta-analysis of multiple nerve injury datasets confirmed Pdyn upregulation in DRG across different nerve injury models. These data support the idea that activation of endogenous opioids, notably dynorphin, is a dynamic indicator of persistent pain states in spinal cord and of nerve injury in DRG. PERSPECTIVE: This is a systematic, quantitative assessment of dynorphin and enkephalin peptides and mRNA in dorsal spinal cord and DRG neurons in response to peripheral inflammation and axotomy. These studies form the foundational framework for understanding how endogenous spinal opioid peptides are involved in nociceptive circuit modulation.

The histology, physiology, neurochemistry and circuitry of the substantia gelatinosa Rolandi (lamina II) in mammalian spinal cord

The substantia gelatinosa Rolandi (SGR) was first described about two centuries ago. In the following decades an enormous amount of information has permitted us to understand - at least in part - its role in the initial processing of pain and itch. Here, I will first provide a comprehensive picture of the histology, physiology, and neurochemistry of the normal SGR. Then, I will analytically discuss the SGR circuits that have been directly demonstrated or deductively envisaged in the course of the intensive research on this area of the spinal cord, with particular emphasis on the pathways connecting the primary afferent fibers and the intrinsic neurons. The perspective existence of neurochemically-defined sets of primary afferent neurons giving rise to these circuits will be also discussed, with the proposition that a cross-talk between different subsets of peptidergic fibers may be the structural and functional substrate of additional gating mechanisms in SGR. Finally, I highlight the role played by slow acting high molecular weight modulators in these gating mechanisms.

Roles of opioid receptor subtype in the spinal antinociception of selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 are commonly used analgesics in various pain conditions. Although their actions are largely thought to be mediated by the blockade of prostaglandin (PG) biosynthesis, evidences suggesting endogenous opioid peptide link in spinal antinociception of COX inhibitor have been reported. We investigated the roles of opioid receptor subtypes in the spinal antinociception of selective COX-2 inhibitor.

METHODS

To examine the antinociception of a selective COX-2 inhibitor, DUP-697 was delivered through an intrathecal catheter, 10 minutes before the formalin test in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Then, the effect of intrathecal pretreatment with CTOP, naltrindole and GNTI, which are µ, δ and κ opioid receptor antagonist, respectively, on the analgesia induced by DUP-697 was assessed.

RESULTS

Intrathecal DUP-697 reduced the flinching response evoked by formalin injection during phase 1 and 2. Naltrindole and GNTI attenuated the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal DUP-697 during both phases of the formalin test. CTOP reversed the antinociception of DUP-697 during phase 2, but not during phase 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal DUP-697, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, effectively relieved inflammatory pain in rats. The δ and κ opioid receptors are involved in the activity of COX-2 inhibitor on the facilitated state as well as acute pain at the spinal level, whereas the µ opioid receptor is related only to facilitated pain.

Nociceptive behavior induced by the endogenous opioid peptides dynorphins in uninjured mice: evidence with intrathecal N-ethylmaleimide inhibiting dynorphin degradation

Dynorphins, the endogenous opioid peptides derived from prodynorphin may participate not only in the inhibition, but also in facilitation of spinal nociceptive transmission. However, the mechanism of pronociceptive dynorphin actions, and the comparative potential of prodynorphin processing products to induce these actions were not fully elucidated. In our studies, we examined pronociceptive effects of prodynorphin fragments dynorphins A and B and big dynorphin consisting of dynorphins A and B, and focused on the mechanisms underlying these effects. Our principal finding was that big dynorphin was the most potent pronociceptive dynorphin; when administered intrathecally into mice at extremely low doses (1-10fmol), big dynorphin produced nociceptive behavior through the activation of the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex by acting on the polyamine recognition site. We next examined whether the endogenous dynorphins participate in the spinal nociceptive transmission using N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) that blocks dynorphin degradation by inhibiting cysteine proteases. Similar to big dynorphin and dynorphin A, NEM produced nociceptive behavior mediated through inhibition of the degradation of endogenous dynorphins, presumably big dynorphin that in turn activates the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex by acting on the polyamine recognition site. Our findings support the notion that endogenous dynorphins are critical neurochemical mediators of spinal nociceptive transmission in uninjured animals. This chapter will review above-described phenomena and their mechanism.

Pronociceptive role of dynorphins in uninjured animals: N -ethylmaleimide-induced nociceptive behavior mediated through inhibition of dynorphin degradation

Intrathecal (i.t.) administration into mice of N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), a cysteine protease inhibitor, produced a characteristic behavioral response, the biting and/or licking of the hindpaw and the tail along with slight hindlimb scratching directed toward the flank. The behavior induced by NEM was inhibited by the intraperitoneal injection of morphine. We have recently reported that dynorphin A and, more potently big dynorphin, consisting of dynorphins A and B, produce the same type of nociceptive response whereas dynorphin B does not [Tan-No K, Esashi A, Nakagawasai O, Niijima F, Tadano T, Sakurada C, Sakurada T, Bakalkin G, Terenius L, Kisara K. Intrathecally administered big dynorphin, a prodynorphin-derived peptide, produces nociceptive behavior through an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor mechanism. Brain Res 2002;952:7-14]. The NEM-induced nociceptive behavior was inhibited by pretreatment with dynorphin A- or dynorphin B-antiserum and each antiserum also reduced the nociceptive effects of i.t.-injected synthetic big dynorphin. The characteristic NEM-evoked response was not observed in prodynorphin knockout mice. Naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, had no effects on the NEM-induced behavior. Ifenprodil, arcaine and agmatine, antagonists at the polyamine recognition site on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor ion-channel complex, and MK-801, an NMDA ion-channel blocker inhibited the NEM-induced effects. Ro25-6981, an antagonist of the NMDA receptor subtype containing NR2B subunit was not active. NEM completely inhibited degradation of dynorphin A by soluble and particulate fractions of mouse spinal cord. Collectively, the results demonstrate that endogenous prodynorphin-derived peptides are pronociceptive in uninjured animals, and required for the NEM-induced behavior. The NEM effects may be mediated through inhibition of the degradation of endogenous dynorphins, presumably big dynorphin that in turn activates the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex by acting on the polyamine recognition site.

Pathobiology of dynorphins in trauma and disease

Dynorphins, endogenous opioid neuropeptides derived from the prodynorphin gene, are involved in a variety of normative physiologic functions including antinociception and neuroendocrine signaling, and may be protective to neurons and oligodendroglia via their opioid receptor-mediated effects. However, under experimental or pathophysiological conditions in which dynorphin levels are substantially elevated, these peptides are excitotoxic largely through actions at glutamate receptors. Because the excitotoxic actions of dynorphins require supraphysiological concentrations or prolonged tissue exposure, there has likely been little evolutionary pressure to ameliorate the maladaptive, non-opioid receptor mediated consequences of dynorphins. Thus, dynorphins can have protective and/or proapoptotic actions in neurons and glia, and the net effect may depend upon the distribution of receptors in a particular region and the amount of dynorphin released. Increased prodynorphin gene expression is observed in several disease states and disruptions in dynorphin processing can accompany pathophysiological situations. Aberrant processing may contribute to the net negative effects of dysregulated dynorphin production by tilting the balance towards dynorphin derivatives that are toxic to neurons and/or oligodendroglia. Evidence outlined in this review suggests that a variety of CNS pathologies alter dynorphin biogenesis. Such alterations are likely maladaptive and contribute to secondary injury and the pathogenesis of disease.

Neuropathic pain activates the endogenous kappa opioid system in mouse spinal cord and induces opioid receptor tolerance

Release of endogenous dynorphin opioids within the spinal cord after partial sciatic nerve ligation (pSNL) is known to contribute to the neuropathic pain processes. Using a phosphoselective antibody [kappa opioid receptor (KOR-P)] able to detect the serine 369 phosphorylated form of the KOR, we determined possible sites of dynorphin action within the spinal cord after pSNL. KOR-P immunoreactivity (IR) was markedly increased in the L4-L5 spinal dorsal horn of wild-type C57BL/6 mice (7-21 d) after lesion, but not in mice pretreated with the KOR antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (norBNI). In addition, knock-out mice lacking prodynorphin, KOR, or G-protein receptor kinase 3 (GRK3) did not show significant increases in KOR-P IR after pSNL. KOR-P IR was colocalized in both GABAergic neurons and GFAP-positive astrocytes in both ipsilateral and contralateral spinal dorsal horn. Consistent with sustained opioid release, KOR knock-out mice developed significantly increased tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in both the early (first week) and late (third week) interval after lesion. Similarly, mice pretreated with norBNI showed enhanced hyperalgesia and allodynia during the 3 weeks after pSNL. Because sustained activation of opioid receptors might induce tolerance, we measured the antinociceptive effect of the kappa agonist U50,488 using radiant heat applied to the ipsilateral hindpaw, and we found that agonist potency was significantly decreased 7 d after pSNL. In contrast, neither prodynorphin nor GRK3 knock-out mice showed U50,488 tolerance after pSNL. These findings suggest that pSNL induced a sustained release of endogenous prodynorphin-derived opioid peptides that activated an anti-nociceptive KOR system in mouse spinal cord. Thus, endogenous dynorphin had both pronociceptive and antinociceptive actions after nerve injury and induced GRK3-mediated opioid tolerance.

Left vagal stimulation induces dynorphin release and suppresses substance P release from the rat thoracic spinal cord during cardiac ischemia

Electrostimulatory forms of therapy can reduce angina that arises from activation of cardiac nociceptive afferent fibers during transient ischemia. This study sought to determine the effects of electrical stimulation of left thoracic vagal afferents (C(8)-T(1) level) on the release of putative nociceptive [substance P (SP)] and analgesic [dynorphin (Dyn)] peptides in the dorsal horn at the T(4) spinal level during coronary artery occlusion in urethane-anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. Release of Dyn and SP was measured by using antibody-coated microprobes. While Dyn and SP had a basal release, occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery only affected SP release, causing an increase from lamina I-VII. Left vagal stimulation increased Dyn release, inhibited basal SP release, and blunted the coronary artery occlusion-induced release of SP. Dyn release reflected activation of descending pathways in the thoracic spinal cord, because vagal afferent stimulation still increased the release of Dyn after bilateral dorsal rhizotomy of T(2)-T(5). These results indicate that electrostimulatory therapy, using vagal afferent excitation, may induce analgesia, in part, via inhibition of the release of SP in the spinal cord, possibly through a Dyn-mediated neuronal interaction.

Nonopioid actions of intrathecal dynorphin evoke spinal excitatory amino acid and prostaglandin E2 release mediated by cyclooxygenase-1 and -2

Spinal dynorphin is hypothesized to contribute to the hyperalgesia that follows tissue and nerve injury or sustained morphine exposure. We considered that these dynorphin actions are mediated by a cascade involving the spinal release of excitatory amino acids and prostaglandins. Unanesthetized rats with lumbar intrathecal injection and loop dialysis probes received intrathecal NMDA, dynorphin A(1-17), or dynorphin A(2-17). These agents elicited an acute release of glutamate, aspartate, and taurine but not serine. The dynorphin peptides and NMDA also elicited a long-lasting spinal release of prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandin release evoked by dynorphin A(2-17) or NMDA was blocked by the NMDA antagonist amino-5-phosphonovalerate as well the cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor ibuprofen. To identify the COX isozyme contributing to this release, SC 58236, a COX-2 inhibitor, was given and found to reduce prostaglandin E2 release evoked by either agent. Unexpectedly, the COX-1 inhibitor SC 58560 also reduced dynorphin A(2-17)-induced, but not NMDA-induced, release of prostaglandin E2. These findings reveal a novel mechanism by which elevated levels of spinal dynorphin seen in pathological conditions may produce hyperalgesia through the release of excitatory amino acids and in part by the activation of a constitutive spinal COX-1 and -2 cascade.

Intrathecally administered cholera toxin blocks allodynia and hyperalgesia in persistent pain models

In persistent pain, the spinal cord concentration of the opioid peptide dynorphin increases dramatically, yet the function of dynorphin remains unknown. If prodynorphin expression could be manipulated in vivo, it might be possible to determine what role dynorphin plays in persistent pain. Previous work in our laboratory showed that prodynorphin expression is regulated through the cyclic adenosine monophosphate pathway. Therefore, we attempted to enhance prodynorphin expression in the spinal cord of rats by stimulating adenylate cyclase with cholera toxin; however, contrary to our hypothesis, intrathecally administered cholera toxin did not enhance prodynorphin expression. Rather, cholera toxin suppressed the increase in prodynorphin produced by inflammation. Cholera toxin also inhibited the allodynia and hyperalgesia associated with inflammation and nerve injury. Interestingly, the antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic actions of cholera toxin were reversed with the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone. These findings suggest that cholera toxin enhances or unmasks an endogenous opioid pathway to produce its antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic effects. Furthermore, these data indicate that the suppression of the inflammation-induced increase in spinal cord prodynorphin is caused by the opioid-mediated decrease in the nociceptive stimulus.

When the DREAM is gone: from basic science to future prospectives in pain management and beyond

DREAM (downstream regulatory element antagonistic modulator) was identified as a novel calcium-binding protein with pleiotropic functions in vitro that are as varied as that of a transcription factor, a binding partner for presenilins, and a modulator of potassium channels. This review will discuss the findings that have implicated DREAM in its various roles. As a transcriptional repressor, DREAM may control the expression of the endogenous opioid gene prodynorphin amongst others, and itself is exquisitely regulated by second messenger molecules, protein kinases and other transcription factors. Recent genetic evidence has revealed a physiological role for DREAM in pain modulation. The interplay between DREAM and prodynorphin is discussed in light of our current understanding of this Janus-like opioid gene. The potential for the involvement of DREAM in other processes beyond pain modulation is considered at the end of this review.

Persistent inflammatory nociception increases levels of dynorphin1-17 in the spinal cord, but not in supraspinal nuclei involved in pain modulation

It is well established that nerve injury or inflammatory injury results in a time-dependent increase in the expression of dynorphin in the spinal cord. However, little is known about the effects of persistent pain on the expression of this endogenous opioid peptide by supraspinal nuclei implicated in the modulation of pain sensitivity. This study used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure the levels of dynorphin(1-17) in the spinal cord as well as in brainstem nuclei 4 hours, 4 days, or 2 weeks after intraplantar injection of saline or complete Freund's adjuvant in the left hind paw. As previously reported, complete Freund adjuvant produced a time-dependent increase in dynorphin that was confined to the ipsilateral dorsal horn. In contrast, levels of dynorphin(1-17) in the nucleus raphe magnus, nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis pars alpha, parabrachial nuclei, microcellular tegmentum, pontine periaqueductal gray, and midbrain periaqueductal gray were not affected at any time after injection of complete Freund adjuvant. These data suggest that alterations in levels of dynorphin do not mediate the up-regulation of activity in bulbospinal pain inhibitory or pain facilitatory pathways that occurs during persistent pain.

Neurokinin A, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and dynorphin A (1-8) in spinal dorsal horn contribute to descending inhibition evoked by nociceptive afferent pathways: an immunocytochemical study

Immunocytochemical technique was used to compare the contents of neurokinin A (NKA), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and dynorphin A (1-8) (DynA) on two sides of the lumbar dorsal horn of rats in which the unilateral thoracic dorsalateral funiculus (DLF) was transected while formalin (0.2 ml, 0.5%) was injected equally into two hindpaws. The results showed that all the NKA-like, CGRP-like, and DynA (1-8)-like immunoreactivities were significantly lower in the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn on the side ipsilateral to the lesioned DLF than that on the side with intact DLF. This implies that peripheral noxious inputs activate the supraspinal descending inhibitory systems which in turn modulate the transmission of noxious message at the spinal level by changing the release of related neuropeptides.

Dynorphin A (1-13) neurotoxicity in vitro: opioid and non-opioid mechanisms in mouse spinal cord neurons

Dynorphin A is an endogenous opioid peptide that preferentially activates kappa-opioid receptors and is antinociceptive at physiological concentrations. Levels of dynorphin A and a major metabolite, dynorphin A (1-13), increase significantly following spinal cord trauma and reportedly contribute to neurodegeneration associated with secondary injury. Interestingly, both kappa-opioid and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists can modulate dynorphin toxicity, suggesting that dynorphin is acting (directly or indirectly) through kappa-opioid and/or NMDA receptor types. Despite these findings, few studies have systematically explored dynorphin toxicity at the cellular level in defined populations of neurons coexpressing kappa-opioid and NMDA receptors. To address this question, we isolated populations of neurons enriched in both kappa-opioid and NMDA receptors from embryonic mouse spinal cord and examined the effects of dynorphin A (1-13) on intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and neuronal survival in vitro. Time-lapse photography was used to repeatedly follow the same neurons before and during experimental treatments. At micromolar concentrations, dynorphin A (1-13) elevated [Ca2+]i and caused a significant loss of neurons. The excitotoxic effects were prevented by MK-801 (Dizocilpine) (10 microM), 2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid (100 microM), or 7-chlorokynurenic acid (100 microM)--suggesting that dynorphin A (1-13) was acting (directly or indirectly) through NMDA receptors. In contrast, cotreatment with (-)-naloxone (3 microM), or the more selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (3 microM), exacerbated dynorphin A (1-13)-induced neuronal loss; however, cell losses were not enhanced by the inactive stereoisomer (+)-naloxone (3 microM). Neuronal losses were not seen with exposure to the opioid antagonists alone (10 microM). Thus, opioid receptor blockade significantly increased toxicity, but only in the presence of excitotoxic levels of dynorphin. This provided indirect evidence that dynorphin also stimulates kappa-opioid receptors and suggests that kappa receptor activation may be moderately neuroprotective in the presence of an excitotoxic insult. Our findings suggest that dynorphin A (1-13) can have paradoxical effects on neuronal viability through both opioid and non-opioid (glutamatergic) receptor-mediated actions. Therefore, dynorphin A potentially modulates secondary neurodegeneration in the spinal cord through complex interactions involving multiple receptors and signaling pathways.

Measurement of cholecystokinin release in vivo in the rat spinal dorsal horn

The microdialysis technique, used to monitor extracellular levels of transmitter substances in the central nervous system of laboratory animals as a reflection of transmitter release, is based on the ability of neurotransmitters to diffuse in the extracellular fluid from the site of release and to cross a semipermeable dialysis membrane. Even though the surgical procedure is not very complicated, the detection of released substances in the recovered dialysate may be difficult. Especially, the measurement of neuropeptide release is limited by the low extracellular concentration and of low recovery as compared to, for example, monoamines. Thus, for example, cholecystokinin (CCK), which is the most abundant neuropeptide in the central nervous system, is found at concentrations that are several orders of magnitude lower than those of classical transmitters. Therefore a highly sensitive detection method is of utmost importance. In the dorsal horn of the spinal cord CCK is found mainly in interneurons and in terminals of descending fibers. CCK seems to be involved in nociceptive transmission and CCK attenuates morphine-induced antinociception. We here describe in vivo microdialysis in the lumbar dorsal horn of the rat with subsequent quantification of the level of CCK-like immunoreactivity (-LI) by a highly sensitive radioimmunoassay.

Loss of antiallodynic and antinociceptive spinal/supraspinal morphine synergy in nerve-injured rats: restoration by MK-801 or dynorphin antiserum

The co-administration of morphine at spinal (i.th.) and supraspinal (i.c.v.) sites to the same rat produces antinociceptive synergy, a phenomenon which may underlie the clinical analgesic utility of this drug. In animals with peripheral nerve injury, however, the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of i.th. morphine is significantly decreased. Here, the possible loss of spinal/supraspinal morphine antinociceptive synergy and relationship to elevation of spinal dynorphin content was studied. Ligation of lumbar spinal nerves resulted in elevated dynorphin in the ipsilateral lumbar and sacral spinal cord. In sham-operated rats supraspinal/spinal co-administration of morphine produced synergistic antinociception which was unaffected by i.th. MK-801 or dynorphin A((1-17)) antiserum. In nerve-injured rats, i.th. morphine was inactive against tactile allodynia and showed diminished in potency against acute nociception without supraspinal/spinal antinociceptive synergy. Antiserum to dynorphin A((1-17)) or the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 increased the antinociceptive potency of i.th. morphine, restored supraspinal/spinal morphine antinociceptive synergy and elicited a dose-related i.th. morphine antiallodynic action. These agents did not demonstrate antinociceptive or antiallodynic activity alone and did not alter morphine actions in sham-operated animals. The loss of spinal/supraspinal antinociceptive synergy and lack of antiallodynic activity of spinal morphine appear to be due to the elevation across multiple spinal segments of dynorphin following nerve injury. Pathological actions of elevated dynorphin may directly or indirectly modulate the NMDA receptor, result in a loss of supraspinal/spinal morphine synergy and may thus account for the decreased clinical analgesic efficacy of morphine in peripheral neuropathies.

Dynorphin A increases substance P release from trigeminal primary afferent C-fibers

Dynorphin A-(1-17) has been found to produce spinal antianalgesia and allodynia. Thus, we studied whether dynorphin A-(1-17) modulates substance P release evoked by the C-fiber-selective stimulant capsaicin (1 microM) from trigeminal nucleus caudalis slices. Very low concentrations of dynorphin A-(1-17) (0.01-0.1 nM) strongly facilitated capsaicin-evoked substance P release. This dynorphin A-(1-17) effect was not blocked by the opioid receptor antagonists naloxone (100 nM), beta-funaltrexamine (20 nM), naloxonazine (1 nM), nor-binaltorphimine (3 nM) and ICI 174,864 (N,N-dialyl-Tyr-Aib-Phe-Leu; 0.3 microM). Yet, the effect of dynorphin A-(1-17) was blocked by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 ((+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d] cyclohepten-5-10-imine maleate; 0.3 microM). Neonatal treatment with capsaicin (50 mg/kg s.c.), which destroys substance P-containing primary afferents, abolished the excitatory effect of dynorphin A-(1-17) on K+-evoked substance P release. In conclusion, dynorphin A-(1-17) increases substance P release from C-fibers by the activation of NMDA receptors which supports the involvement of presynaptic mechanisms in dynorphin-induced antianalgesia and allodynia.

The induction of pain: an integrative review

The highly disagreeable sensation of pain results from an extraordinarily complex and interactive series of mechanisms integrated at all levels of the neuroaxis, from the periphery, via the dorsal horn to higher cerebral structures. Pain is usually elicited by the activation of specific nociceptors ('nociceptive pain'). However, it may also result from injury to sensory fibres, or from damage to the CNS itself ('neuropathic pain'). Although acute and subchronic, nociceptive pain fulfils a warning role, chronic and/or severe nociceptive and neuropathic pain is maladaptive. Recent years have seen a progressive unravelling of the neuroanatomical circuits and cellular mechanisms underlying the induction of pain. In addition to familiar inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and bradykinin, potentially-important, pronociceptive roles have been proposed for a variety of 'exotic' species, including protons, ATP, cytokines, neurotrophins (growth factors) and nitric oxide. Further, both in the periphery and in the CNS, non-neuronal glial and immunecompetent cells have been shown to play a modulatory role in the response to inflammation and injury, and in processes modifying nociception. In the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, wherein the primary processing of nociceptive information occurs, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are activated by glutamate released from nocisponsive afferent fibres. Their activation plays a key role in the induction of neuronal sensitization, a process underlying prolonged painful states. In addition, upon peripheral nerve injury, a reduction of inhibitory interneurone tone in the dorsal horn exacerbates sensitized states and further enhance nociception. As concerns the transfer of nociceptive information to the brain, several pathways other than the classical spinothalamic tract are of importance: for example, the postsynaptic dorsal column pathway. In discussing the roles of supraspinal structures in pain sensation, differences between its 'discriminative-sensory' and 'affective-cognitive' dimensions should be emphasized. The purpose of the present article is to provide a global account of mechanisms involved in the induction of pain. Particular attention is focused on cellular aspects and on the consequences of peripheral nerve injury. In the first part of the review, neuronal pathways for the transmission of nociceptive information from peripheral nerve terminals to the dorsal horn, and therefrom to higher centres, are outlined. This neuronal framework is then exploited for a consideration of peripheral, spinal and supraspinal mechanisms involved in the induction of pain by stimulation of peripheral nociceptors, by peripheral nerve injury and by damage to the CNS itself. Finally, a hypothesis is forwarded that neurotrophins may play an important role in central, adaptive mechanisms modulating nociception. An improved understanding of the origins of pain should facilitate the development of novel strategies for its more effective treatment.

Dynorphin A(1-8): stability and implications for in vitro opioid activity

The opioid binding profile and in vitro activity of the endogenous opioid peptide dynorphin A(1-8) have been studied. At opioid receptors in guinea-pig brain dynorphin A(1-8) was nonselective, although with some preference for the delta receptor (Ki 4.6 nM) over µ (Ki 18 nM) and kappa (Ki 40 nM) receptors. However, a high degree of metabolism was observed, with less than 10% of added dynorphin A(1-8) remaining at the end of the binding assay. In the presence of peptidase inhibitors to prevent breakdown of the N- and C-termini and the Gly3-Phe4 bond the major metabolite was [Leu5]enkephalin (representing 49% recovered material). This was reduced by inclusion of an inhibitor of endopeptidase EC 3.4.24.15. In the presence of all the peptidase inhibitors the affinity for kappa receptors (Ki 0.5 nM) relative to µ and delta receptors increased, but no selectivity of binding was observed. This lack of selectivity was confirmed using membranes from C6 glioma cells expressing rat opioid receptors. The agonist effect of dynorphin A(1-8) in the mouse vas deferens (EC50 116 nM) and guinea-pig ileum (EC50 38 nM) was mediated through the kappa receptor as evidenced by the rightward shifts afforded by the kappa -selective antagonist norbinaltorphimine. In the presence of peptidase inhibition potency was improved 2-fold in the mouse vas deferens and 20-fold in the guinea-pig ileum, but this agonist activity was mediated through delta receptors in the vas deferens and µ receptors in the ileum, as a result of the formation and stabilization of [Leu5]enkephalin. The results confirm the absence of receptor selectivity of dynorphin A(1-8) in binding assays but show that its agonist effects, at least in vitro, are mediated exclusively through the kappa opioid receptor.Key words: dynorphin A(1-8), opioid receptors, peptide metabolism, mouse vas deferens, guinea-pig ileum.

The release of immunoreactive neuropeptide Y in the spinal cord of the anaesthetized rat and cat

The release of immunoreactive (ir-) neuropeptide Y (NYP) was studied in the anaesthetized rat and cat by means of microprobes bearing immobilized antibodies to the C terminus of NPY. An extensive basal release of ir-NYP was detected throughout the dorsal and upper ventral horn of the rat. This spontaneous release was not significantly altered by sectioning the spinal cord at the thoraco-lumbar junction nor by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves. Since NPY is virtually absent in primary afferents it is probable that spontaneous release within the spinal cord comes from active NPY-containing intrinsic spinal neurones. In the spinal cat spontaneous release of ir-NPY was detected in the mid-dorsal horn and this was unaltered by peripheral noxious thermal or noxious mechanical stimuli. As in the rat, release from intrinsic spinal neurones is most probable. The extensive spontaneous release of ir-NPY in both species suggests a widespread role in spinal cord function.