The metabolic activation of benz[a]anthracene in hamster embryo cells: evidence that diol-epoxides react with guanosine, deoxyguanosine and adenosine in nucleic acids

DNA modification by chemical carcinogens

The chemistry and molecular biology of DNA adducts is only one part of the carcinogenic process. Many other factors will determine whether a particular chemical will exert a carcinogenic effect. For example, the size of particles upon which a carcinogenic may be adsorbed will influence whether or not, and if so where, deposition within the lung will occur. The simultaneous exposure to several different agents may enhance or inhibit the metabolism of a chemical to its ultimate carcinogenic form (Rice et al., 1984; Smolarek and Baird, 1984). The ultimate carcinogenic metabolites may be influenced in their ability to react with DNA by a number of factors such as internal levels of detoxifying enzymes, the presence of other metabolic intermediates such as glutathione with which they could react either enzymatically or non-enzymatically, and the state of DNA which is probably most heavily influenced by whether or not the cell is undergoing replication or particular sequences being expressed. Replicating forks have been shown to be more extensively modified than other areas of DNA. Another critical factor which can influence the final outcome of the DNA damage is whether or not the modifications can be repaired. If this occurs with high fidelity and the cell has not previously undergone replication then the effect of the damage by the carcinogen is likely to be minimal. The major area in which progress is needed is an understanding of what this damage really does to the cell such that after an additional period of time, which may be as long as twenty or more years, these prior events are expressed and cell proliferation occurs. Clearly additional stimulatory factors, for example tumor promoting agents such as the phorbol esters or phenobarbital, are often needed. After such prolonged periods it seems likely that the DNA adducts would no longer be present. However, the way in which their earlier presence is remembered is not clear. Simple mutations do not explain all the characteristics of tumor progression and, when it occurs, regression. Even if a specific site mutation does occur then its expression must be under other types of control. Any explanation of the action of DNA modification at the molecular level also requires that account be taken of the diverse nature of the DNA adducts from simple modifications such as methylation to bulkier adducts such as benzo[a]pyrene, aflatoxin or aromatic amines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The metabolic activation of dibenzo[a,e]fluoranthene in vitro. Evidence that its bay-region and pseudo-bay-region diol-epoxides react preferentially with guanosine

Dibenzo[a,e]fluoranthene ( DBF ), a non- alternant carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), binds covalently to DNA. The main adducts were characterized as covalent additions of its bay-region and pseudo-bay-region diol-epoxides. The structure of these 2 adducts was analyzed by mass spectrometry using their persilyl derivatives. 3,4-Dihydroxy-1,2-epoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro- DBF (3,4-diol-1,2-epoxy- DBF ) and 12,13-dihydroxy-10,11-epoxy-10,11,12,13-tetrahydro- DBF (12, 13-diol-10,11-epoxy- DBF ) obtained by synthesis were allowed to react in vitro with calf thymus DNA or with poly(G). The comigration of DNA and poly(G) adducts isolated after acid hydrolysis of DNA and poly(G) was in good agreement with mass spectroscopic results: both bay-region and pseudo-bay-region DBF diol-epoxides reacted with guanine residues.

The activation of procarcinogens to mutagens by cultured rat hepatocytes in the L5178Y/TK mutation assay

Whole cell preparations derived from collagenase-treated rat liver were cocultivated overnight with stationary (non-shaking) cultures of L5178Y/TK+/- cells in the presence of 8 different chemicals selected as representative aromatic amine, polycyclic hydrocarbon, or nitrosamine procarcinogens. When tested in the presence of hepatocytes, 2-aminoanthracene, 2-aminofluorene, N-nitrosodimethylamine, N-nitrosodiethylamine, N-nitrosodipropylamine, 3-methylcholanthrene, and benzo[a]pyrene all produced substantial dose-dependent increases in trifluorothymidine-resistant variants compared to solvent controls after 20 h total exposure time. Only N-nitrosodipropylamine (DPrN) and N-nitrosodiethylamine (DEN) produced any dose-related mutagenic activity in similar experiments where hepatocytes were omitted; however, the response for the DPrN was quite variable at high doses in the absence of hepatocytes and the mutagenic response for the DEN was consistently enhanced at all dose levels by the presence of hepatocytes. Benzanthracene was not active in the presence of whole hepatocytes, even when tested with cells from a rat pretreated 24 h earlier with 20 mg/kg benzanthracene. Excepting benzanthracene, these data suggest that rat hepatocytes can be used to active 3 types of procarcinogens to mutagens in the L5178Y/TK gene mutation assay.