Action of azelastine on intracellular Ca2+ in cultured airway smooth muscle

Azelastine desensitization of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1: a potential mechanism explaining its therapeutic effect in nonallergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Capsaicin, a prototypic transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) agonist, has been shown to be more clinically effective in the treatment of nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) compared with other rhinitis subtypes. Azelastine has also been found to be clinically effective in the treatment of NAR but its mechanism(s) of action is still poorly elucidated. This study was designed to determine, using in vitro cell lines, whether topical therapies including azelastine have activity on TRPV1 ion channels similar to capsaicin.

METHODS

The effects of capsaicin (1 μM), azelastine (30 μM), bepotastine (10 μM), olopatadine (10 μM), and fluticasone (200 μM) on TRPV1 channels using mice neuronal cells (Cath.a), as surrogates for submucosal sensory neurons, and human nasal epithelial cells (hNEC) were determined and compared. For azelastine, bepotastine, and capsaicin, which elicited an agonist effect on TRPV1, live cell [Ca(2+)] signaling in Cath.a cells and hNECs expressing TRPV1 were performed in the absence and presence of capsazepine at 10 μM (a TRPV1 antagonist) or using wild-type mouse embryonic fibroblasts (wtMEFs) that express TRPV1 ion channels and TRPV1 homozygous null mutant (TRPV1-/-) knockout MEF cells as controls to establish TRPV1 channel selectivity. As azelastine has previously been found clinically effective in NAR, additional experiments were performed to determine its ability to desensitize TRPV1 ion channels and its effect on regulating intracellular calcium homeostasis.

RESULTS

Cath.a cells treated with azelastine, bepotastine, or capsaicin showed a significant increase in TRPV1-dependant (Ca(2+)) specific cytosolic fluorescence. Continuous treatment with azelastine or capsaicin resulted in desensitization of TRPV1 channels. In hNECs, azelastine stimulation resulted in Ca(2+) shifts from the cytosol to mitochondria and overexpression of hematopoietic cell-specific Lyn substrate 1-associated protein X1, which may thus be effective in cytosolic Ca(2+) homeostasis.

CONCLUSION

Azelastine, similar to capsaicin, exhibits direct activity on TRPV1 ion channels that may represent a novel mechanistic pathway explaining its clinical efficacy in NAR.

Effect of azelastine on cardiac repolarization of guinea-pig cardiomyocytes, hERG K⁺ channel, and human L-type and T-type Ca²⁺ channel

Azelastine is a second generation histamine H₁-receptor antagonist used as an anti-asthmatic and anti-allergic drug that can induce QT prolongation and torsades de pointes. We investigated the acute effects of azelastine on human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) channels, action potential duration (APD), and L-type (I(Ca,L)) and T-type Ca²⁺ current (I(Ca,T)) to determine the electrophysiological basis for its proarrhythmic potential. Azelastine increased the APD at 90% of repolarization concentration dependently, with an IC₅₀ of 1.08 nM in guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. We examined the effects of azelastine on the hERG channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes and HEK293 cells using two-microelectrode voltage-clamp and patch-clamp techniques. Azelastine induced a concentration-dependent decrease of the hERG current amplitude at the end of the voltage steps and tail currents. The IC₅₀ for the azelastine-induced block of the hERG currents expressed in HEK293 cells was 11.43 nM, while the drug inhibited I(Ca,L) and I(Ca,T) with IC₅₀ values of 7.60 and 26.21 μM, respectively. The S6 domain mutations, Y652A partially attenuated and F656A abolished hERG current block. These results suggest that azelastine is a potent blocker of hERG channels rather than I(Ca,L) or I(Ca,T), providing molecular mechanisms for the arrhythmogenic side effects during the clinical administration of azelastine.

Inhibitory effect of azelastine on allergic itch-associated response in mice sensitized with mosquito salivary glands extract

We examined whether azelastine would inhibit itch-associated responses of mice to mosquito allergy. Repeated injections of mosquito salivary gland extract increased scratching and sensory nerve activity. Azelastine inhibited the increased scratching and nerve activity, while terfenadine was without effects. Dexamethasone did not affect the increased scratching. Azelastine suppressed high K(+)-induced increase in intracellular free Ca(2+) in primary cultures of mouse sensory neurons. Direct inhibition by azelastine of sensory neurons may be at least involved in the anti-pruritic effect of azelastine. Histamine, substance P, and leukotriene B(4) may not play a key role in the itching of mosquito allergy.

H1-antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti-inflammatory actions and cardiac effects

This review addresses novel concepts of histamine H1-receptor function and attempts to relate them to the anti-inflammatory effects of H1-antihistamines. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiotoxic effects of H1-antihistamines are discussed. H1-receptors are G-protein-coupled-receptors (GPCRs), the inactive and active conformations of which coexist in equilibrium. The degree receptor activation in the absence of histamine is its 'constitutive activity'. In this two-state model, histamine acts as an agonist by combining with and stabilizing the activated conformation of the H1-receptor to shift the equilibrium towards the activated state. Drugs classified previously as antagonists act as either inverse agonists or neutral antagonists. Inverse agonists combine with and stabilize the inactive conformation of the receptor to shift the equilibrium towards the inactive state. Thus, they may down-regulate constitutive receptor activity, even in the absence of histamine. Neutral antagonists combine equally with both conformations of the receptor, do not affect basal receptor activity but do interfere with agonist binding. All H1-antihistamines examined to date are inverse agonists. As the term 'H1-receptor antagonists' is obviously erroneous, we suggest that it be replaced by 'H1-antihistamines'. The observations that H1-receptors modulate NF-kappaB activation and that there are complex interactions between GPCRs, has allowed us to postulate receptor dependent-mechanisms for some anti-inflammatory effects of H1-antihistamines, e.g. inhibition of ICAM-1 expression and the effects of bradykinin. Finally, the finding that blockade of HERG1 K+ channels is the mechanism by which some H1-antihistamines may cause cardiac arrhythmias has allowed the development of preclinical tests to predict such activity.

Effects of azelastine on contractility, action potentials and L-type Ca(2+) current in guinea pig cardiac preparations

Azelastine is used for symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis and asthma bronchiale. In vitro studies in smooth muscle cells from guinea pig trachea and ileum demonstrate that the drug blocks L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca, L)). However, for safety reasons, it is important to know whether azelastine also affects cardiac I(Ca, L) in therapeutically relevant concentrations. We have therefore studied the effects of azelastine on I(Ca, L) in guinea pig ventricular myocytes using standard whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Force of contraction and action potentials from isolated papillary muscles of the same species were also investigated at physiological temperature (36 degrees C). Azelastine (30 microM) significantly reduced force of contraction, shortened action potential duration, and depressed maximum upstroke velocity. I(Ca, L) was elicited by 200-ms-long clamp steps from -100 to 0 mV (one pulse every 3 s). Azelastine blocked I(Ca, L) reversibly and concentration-dependently with an IC(50) of 20.2+/-1.3 microM and a Hill coefficient of 1.1. At 10 microM, azelastine shifted steady-state inactivation by 5 mV (n=7) to more negative potentials. The time course of I(Ca, L) inactivation could be described by a double exponential function. Azelastine (10 microM) significantly shortened the slow inactivation time constant (tau(s)) from 54.2+/-2.8 ms under control conditions to 38.7+/-2.9 ms (n=16) in the presence of drug. Azelastine also reduced low-voltage-activated Ca(2+) currents with a similar IC(50) value (24 microM, at -35 mV). Since the therapeutic plasma concentrations are in the order of 10-100 nM, we conclude that azelastine does indeed affect also cardiac I(Ca, L), but the concentrations required are at least two orders of magnitude larger than those obtained during drug therapy.

Azelastine--a novel in vivo inhibitor of leukotriene biosynthesis: a possible mechanism of action: a mini review

Leukotrienes have been proposed as important chemical mediators of allergic inflammation, and there is evidence that azelastine (Astelin) can affect leukotriene-mediated allergic responses. One of the enzymes required for the synthesis of leukotrienes from arachidonic acid is 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO). Azelastine, which is preferentially taken up by the lung and alveolar macrophages, inhibits leukotriene generation in the airways. This property of azelastine may contribute to its therapeutic efficacy in the long-term treatment and management of rhinitis and asthma. Azelastine does not directly inhibit 5-LO in disrupted murine peritoneal cells and rat basophilic leukemia cells (IC50 > 100 microM), but does have moderate 5-LO inhibitory activity in intact murine peritoneal cells (IC50 = 10 microM, 5 min) and in chopped guinea pig liver (IC50 = 14 microM, 2 hr). The generation and release of leukotrienes in human neutrophils and eosinophils is also inhibited by azelastine (IC50 = 0.9-1.1 microM). Furthermore, azelastine is a potent and specific inhibitor of allergen-induced generation of leukotrienes in the nose of the guinea pig (ID50 < 100 micrograms/kg, im, 20 min) as well as in patients with rhinitis (2 mg, po, 4 hr; ID50 < 30 micrograms/kg). Azelastine also inhibits allergen-induced, leukotriene-mediated, pyrilamine-resistant bronchoconstriction (oral ID50 = 60 micrograms/kg, 2 hr and 120 micrograms/kg, 24 hr). This profile suggests that azelastine may be a novel inhibitor of Ca(2+)-dependent translocation of 5-lipoxygenase from cytosol to the nuclear envelope or a FLAP inhibitor rather than a direct 5-LO inhibitor.

Effects of azelastine on membrane currents in tracheal smooth muscle cells isolated from the guinea-pig

Azelastine [4-(p-chlorobenzyl)-2-(hexahydro-1-methyl -1H-azepin-4-yl)-1-(2H)-phthalazinone hydrochloride], an anti-allergic agent, inhibited the high K(+)-induced contraction in tracheal smooth muscle cells isolated from the guinea-pig. In order to investigate the ionic mechanisms, we examined the effects of azelastine on membrane currents, using the tight-seal whole cell voltage clamp technique. Azelastine (1-100 microM) caused an inhibition of the Ba2+ inward current (IBa) through the voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ channel in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect of azelastine on IBa was fully reversible. The IC50 value for azelastine-induced inhibition of IBa was approximately 8 microM, and 100 microM azelastine completely suppressed IBa. Azelastine exerted mainly a tonic block of IBa but did not show use dependence. Azelastine (10 microM) shifted the quasi-steady-state inactivation curve of IBa to more negative membrane potentials by approximately -20 mV, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of azelastine on IBa was voltage-dependent. In addition, azelastine produced inhibitory actions on other membrane currents (i.e. the voltage-dependent transient outward K+ current and the Ca(2+)-activated oscillatory K+ current) at doses higher than 10 microM. These results suggest that azelastine inhibits the voltage-dependent L-type Ca2+ current in single tracheal smooth muscle cells, which may contribute to the anti-allergic actions of azelastine in airways.

Mechanism of relaxing action of the antiasthmatic drug, azelastine, in isolated porcine tracheal smooth muscle

Azelastine (1-300 microM) inhibited contractions of isolated porcine trachea induced by high K+, carbachol and endothelin-1 (ET-1) with a decrease in [Ca2+]cyt (as measured by fura-2-fluorescence). Verapamil (0.1-10 microM) also inhibited the high K(+)-induced increases in [Ca2+]cyt and contraction, although it only partially inhibited the responses evoked by carbachol or ET-1. In the absence of extracellular Ca2+ (with 0.5 mM EGTA), carbachol induced a transient increase in [Ca2+]cyt and force by releasing Ca2+ from cellular stores. Azelastine (100 microns) completely inhibited these contransient changes. In the absence of extracellular Ca2+, carbachol and 12-deoxyphorbol 13-isobutyrate (DPB) induced small sustained contractions without increasing [Ca2+]cyt. Azelastine inhibited these contractions. In muscle permeabilized with alpha-toxin, Ca2+ (0.3-3 microM) induced contraction in a concentration-dependent manner. DPB (without GTP) and carbachol or ET-1 (with GTP) enhanced the Ca(2+)-induced contraction. Azelastine partially inhibited the contraction induced by 0.3 microM Ca2+ but not the contraction induced by 3 microM Ca2+, and strongly inhibited the potentiating effects of DPB, carbachol and ET-1. Azelastine had no effect on the content of cyclic AMP or cyclic GMP. These results suggest that azelastine inhibits smooth muscle contraction by (i) decreasing [Ca2+]cyt, by inhibition of Ca2+ channels, (ii) decreasing agonist-induced Ca2+ release, and (iii) direct inhibition of contractile elements.