Blanco MA, Sahin E, Li Y, Roberts CJ. Reexamining protein-protein and protein-solvent interactions from Kirkwood-Buff analysis of light scattering in multi-component solutions.
J Chem Phys 2011;
134:225103. [PMID:
21682538 DOI:
10.1063/1.3596726]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The classic analysis of Rayleigh light scattering (LS) is re-examined for multi-component protein solutions, within the context of Kirkwood-Buff (KB) theory as well as a more generalized canonical treatment. Significant differences arise when traditional treatments that approximate constant pressure and neglect concentration fluctuations in one or more (co)solvent/co-solute species are compared with more rigorous treatments at constant volume and with all species free to fluctuate. For dilute solutions, it is shown that LS can be used to rigorously and unambiguously obtain values for the osmotic second virial coefficient (B(22)), in contrast with recent arguments regarding protein interactions deduced from LS experiments. For more concentrated solutions, it is shown that conventional analysis over(under)-estimates the magnitude of B(22) for significantly repulsive(attractive) conditions, and that protein-protein KB integrals (G(22)) are the more relevant quantity obtainable from LS. Published data for α-chymotrypsinogen A and a series of monoclonal antibodies at different pH and salt concentrations are re-analyzed using traditional and new treatments. The results illustrate that while traditional analysis may be sufficient if one is interested in only the sign of B(22) or G(22), the quantitative values can be significantly in error. A simple approach is illustrated for determining whether protein concentration (c(2)) is sufficiently dilute for B(22) to apply, and for correcting B(22) values from traditional LS regression at higher c(2) values. The apparent molecular weight M(2, app) obtained from LS is shown to generally not be equal to the true molecular weight, with the differences arising from a combination of protein-solute and protein-cosolute interactions that may, in principle, also be determined from LS.
Collapse