Reverse differential staining of sister chromatids induced by Hoechst plus black light and endonuclease

A historical overview of bromo-substituted DNA and sister chromatid differentiation

The thymidine analogue 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) has been widely used to make sister chromatid differentiation (SCD) evident in metaphase chromosomes of cells grown for two cycles in BrdU and, thus, containing varying amounts of the thymidine analogue. A direct consequence was the possibility of making sister chromatid exchange (SCE) evident without using autoradiographic procedures. The latter phenomenon was first discovered in 1953, and its frequency is considered a reliable marker of pathological cell situations, as well as an indicator of mutagenic compounds. Several experimental procedures were found which produced SCD, such as the use of fluorochromes like 33258 Hoechst or acridine orange, whose observation under fluorescence microscopy was directly recorded by photos or stained with Giemsa to make chromosome preparations permanent. Other treatments followed by Giemsa staining required the use of saline hot solutions, acid solutions, nuclease attack and specific monoclonal antibodies. Basically two molecular mechanisms were invoked to explain the different affinity of Giemsa stain for differential BrdU-substituted chromatid DNA. The first implied debromination of chromatid DNA, whose occurrence would be greater in chromatids containing an amount of BrdU greater than that present in sister chromatids. The second mechanism, although not denying the importance of DNA debromination, postulated that chromatin structural organization, in terms of DNA-protein and/or protein-protein DNA interaction, is responsible for SCD production.

Identifying different types of chromatin using Giemsa staining

Mixtures of polychrome methylene blue-eosin Y (i.e., Giemsa stain) are widely used in biological staining. They induce a striking purple coloration of chromatin DNA (the Romanowsky-Giemsa effect), which contrasts with the blue-stained RNA-containing cytoplasm and nucleoli. After specific prestaining treatments that induce chromatin disorganization (giving banded or harlequin chromosomes), Giemsa staining produces a differential coloration, with C- and G-bands appearing in purple whereas remaining chromosome regions are blue. Unsubstituted (TT) and bromo-substituted (BT) DNAs also appear purple and blue, respectively. The same occurs in the case of BT and BB chromatids.In addition to discussing the use of Giemsa stain as a suitable method to reveal specific features of chromosome structure, some molecular processes and models are also described to explain Giemsa staining mechanisms of chromatin.

DNA alteration induced by ultraviolet light in human metaphase chromosomes substituted with 5'-bromodeoxy uridine: monitoring by monoclonal antibodies to double-stranded and single stranded DNA

Fixed human metaphase chromosomes, whose DNA had been substituted with 5'-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) for two rounds of replication (TB/BB) or for one round in BrdUrd followed by another round in thymidine (TT/BT), were treated with ultraviolet light (UV), in the presence or in the absence of 33258 Hoechst, to produce sister chromatid differentiation (SCD). Giemsa staining was compared with staining with monoclonal antibodies to double-stranded or single-stranded DNA. We confirmed that UV acts by debrominating BrdUrd-stubstituted DNA but showed that debromination alone cannot explain all our findings. We postulated that UV-induced protein-protein cross-linking, occurring to a different extent in differently BrdUrd-substituted chromatids, may also be invoked in explaining our data. Lastly, the different behaviour of unifilarly substituted TB as opposed to BT chromatids in UV-treated chromosomes, allowed us to hypothesize that such chromatids may differ depending on whether or not newly synthesized DNA is formed on a BrdUrd-containing strand.

Nuclease activity in human metaphase chromosomes substituted with 5'-bromodeoxyuridine

Human metaphase chromosomes, substituted with 5'-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) for one, two or three rounds of replication, were briefly pretreated with ultraviolet light (UV), in the presence of 33258 Hoechst, and subsequently digested with either exonuclease III or S1 nuclease. Pretreatment alone was not sufficient to induce sister chromatid differential staining (SCD), but allowed subsequent digestion with exonuclease III or S1. Such enzymes were found to induce SCD with ethidium bromide, as unifilarly BrdUrd-substituted chromatids (TB) were more resistant than bifilarly substituted chromatids (BB). Other experiments with DNase I or the AluI and HaeIII restriction endonucleases showed that only HaeIII was capable of inducing SCD by attacking BB more than TB chromatids preincubated with UV in the presence of Hoechst. SCD with exonuclease III/S1 nuclease seems to be due to (1) UV-induced DNA debromination occurring twice in BB as opposed to TB chromatids, and (2) alteration of chromatin protein structure occurring to a different extent in differently BrdUrd-substituted chromatids. Our findings with endonucleases, on the contrary, may depend on the capacity of enzymatic cleavage to cancel the different protein alterations induced differentially by UV in TB as opposed to BB chromatids.