The Gag polypeptides of the Drosophila 1731 retrotransposon are associated to virus-like particles and to nuclei

Transposable elements in Drosophila

Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile genetic elements that can mobilize within host genomes. As TEs comprise more than 40% of the human genome and are linked to numerous diseases, understanding their mechanisms of mobilization and regulation is important. Drosophila melanogaster is an ideal model organism for the study of eukaryotic TEs as its genome contains a diverse array of active TEs. TEs universally impact host genome size via transposition and deletion events, but may also adopt unique functional roles in host organisms. There are 2 main classes of TEs: DNA transposons and retrotransposons. These classes are further divided into subgroups of TEs with unique structural and functional characteristics, demonstrating the significant variability among these elements. Despite this variability, D. melanogaster and other eukaryotic organisms utilize conserved mechanisms to regulate TEs. This review focuses on the transposition mechanisms and regulatory pathways of TEs, and their functional roles in D. melanogaster.

Beyond plasma membrane targeting: role of the MA domain of Gag in retroviral genome encapsidation

The MA (matrix) domain of the retroviral Gag polyprotein plays several critical roles during virus assembly. Although best known for targeting the Gag polyprotein to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane for virus budding, recent studies have revealed that MA also contributes to selective packaging of the genomic RNA (gRNA) into virions. In this Review, we summarize recent progress in understanding how MA participates in genome incorporation. We compare the mechanisms by which the MA domains of different retroviral Gag proteins influence gRNA packaging, highlighting variations and similarities in how MA directs the subcellular trafficking of Gag, interacts with host factors and binds to nucleic acids. A deeper understanding of how MA participates in these diverse functions at different stages in the virus assembly pathway will require more detailed information about the structure of the MA domain within the full-length Gag polyprotein. In particular, it will be necessary to understand the structural basis of the interaction of MA with gRNA, host transport factors and membrane phospholipids. A better appreciation of the multiple roles MA plays in genome packaging and Gag localization might guide the development of novel antiviral strategies in the future.

Genetic variation of copia suppression in Drosophila melanogaster

Transposable elements (TEs) are genomic parasites that propagate by exploiting its host reproductive machinery. However, some hosts have evolved the ability to silence TE activity, whereas others have not. We are investigating the population dynamics of TE host-silencing pathways, particularly copia long terminal repeat retrotransposon in Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we identify large effect genes involved in copia suppression by using a semi-quantitative analysis to assay levels of copia plasmids (believed to be an intermediate of transposition) in 98 recombinant inbred lines constructed from a line exhibiting high copia transpositions and a line exhibiting no transpositions. The results revealed that the influence of copia copy number and transcription level on copia plasmid concentrations are weak and that genomic factors, presumably encoded by the host, have stronger effects on transposition rates. We mapped a QTL affecting copia plasmid concentration within the 33A-43E cytological region of the second chromosome and applied a quantitative deficiency complementation analysis on this chromosomal region. One out of the two large effect deficiencies on copia plasmid concentrations corresponded to the vasa gene, an important component of the nuage-piwi RNA TE-silencing machinery. We hypothesize that copia suppression occurs by the joint action of several post-transcriptional mechanisms with at least one of the blocks taking place in the nuage.

Amplification of the 1731 LTR retrotransposon in Drosophila melanogaster cultured cells: Origin of neocopies and impact on the genome

Transposable elements (TEs), represent a large fraction of the eukaryotic genome. In Drosophila melanogaster, about 20% of the genome corresponds to such middle repetitive DNA dispersed sequences. A fraction of TEs is composed of elements showing a retrovirus-like structure, the LTR-retrotransposons, the first TEs to be described in the Drosophila genome. Interestingly, in D. melanogaster embryonic immortal cell culture genomes the copy number of these LTR-retrotransposons was revealed to be higher than the copy number in the Drosophila genome, presumably as the result of transposition of some copies to new genomic locations [Potter, S.S., Brorein Jr., W.J., Dunsmuir, P., Rubin, G.M., 1979. Transposition of elements of the 412, copia and 297 dispersed repeated gene families in Drosophila. Cell 17, 415-427; Junakovic, N., Di Franco, C., Best-Belpomme, M., Echalier, G., 1988. On the transposition of copia-like nomadic elements in cultured Drosophila cells. Chromosoma 97, 212-218]. This suggests that so many transpositions modified the genome organisation and consequently the expression of targeted genes. To understand what has directed the transposition of TEs in Drosophila cell culture genomes, a search to identify the newly transposed copies was undertaken using 1731, a LTR-retrotransposon. A comparison between 1731 full-length elements found in the fly sequenced genome (y(1); cn(1)bw(1), sp(1) stock) and 1731 full-length elements amplified by PCR in the two cell line was done. The resulting data provide evidence that all 1731 neocopies were derived from a single copy slightly active in the Drosophila genome and subsequently strongly activated in cultured cells; and that this active copy is related to a newly evolved genomic variant (Kalmykova, A.I., et al., 2004. Selective expansion of the newly evolved genomic variants of retrotransposon 1731 in the Drosophila genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 2281-2289). Moreover, neocopies are shown to be inserted in different sets of genes in the two cell lines suggesting they might be involved in the biological and physiological differences observed between Kc and S2 cell lines.

Virus-like particle formation in Drosophila melanogaster germ cells suggests a complex translational regulation of the retrotransposon cycle and new mechanisms inhibiting transposition

Transposition of 1731, a Drosophila melanogaster LTR retrotransposon, was investigated in reproductive organs by RNA, protein and VLP distribution during its life cycle. We detected 1731 transcription in oogonia but not in spermatogonia; in all cells during oogenesis but only in primary spermatocytes; and in ovarian cytoplasm but both in nuclei and cytoplasm of primary spermatocytes. By confocal scanning, we showed that whereas Gag protein appeared in all cytoplasms during oogenesis, in testes Gag detection began in late premeiotic primary spermatocytes and increased in elongating spermatids suggesting distinct mechanisms of 1731 transcription and translation regulation. By electron microscopy, we did not detect 1731 VLPs in ovaries, suggesting a complex post-translational control blocking VLP assembly and transposition. Interestingly, in testes we discovered VLP aggregates in cystic cytoplasm of maturing partially individualized spermatids. In testes, we observed two delays in 1731 product expressions, suggesting a complex temporal control mechanism. Transcriptional/translational delay may be determined by accumulation of 1731 RNAs in primary spermatocyte nuclei. Translational/VLP assembly delay may be determined by post-transductional mechanisms controlling +1 frameshift and Pol-protein degradation. Our results indicated two differential mechanisms inhibiting 1731 transposition in Drosophila melanogaster ovaries and testes. In addition, we proposed a new mechanism for transposition control at the cell cycle level.

Expression of the telomeric retrotransposon HeT-A in Drosophila melanogaster is correlated with cell proliferation

Drosophila melanogaster extends its telomeres by transposition of two non-LTR retrotransposons, HeT-A and TART, to chromosome ends. We have determined the tissue-specific expression of these two elements by whole-mount in situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled RNA sense and antisense probes in the germ line and in a variety of larval tissues during normal development in the wild type and in tissues of mutants that cause overproliferation. Our results indicate that transcript levels, which are a key component in the process of telomere elongation in D. melanogaster, are correlated with cell proliferation in normal tissues and that RNA levels are elevated in growth-stimulated tissues.

Developmental expression analysis of the 1731 retrotransposon reveals an enhancement of Gag-Pol frameshifting in males of Drosophila melanogaster

Extensive analyses of Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposon transcriptions in cultured cells or during development have been reported, but little is known about their translation during the development of the fly. Analysis of the translational products of the 1731 Drosophila melanogaster retrotransposon in Kc Drosophila cultured cells has been reported, showing the existence of primary products (Gag and Pol) and of processed polypeptides of various sizes. Study of 1731 retrotransposon expression at both levels of transcription and translation during the development of Drosophila melanogaster, is presented. 1731 transcripts were detected by in situ hybridization and 1731 proteins were detected by immunostaining and immunoblotting in embryos and in adult gonads. 1731 transcripts and proteins were detected in the mesoderm and central nervous system during embryonic development, in nurse cells and follicle cells in adult ovaries and in primary spermatocytes in adult testes. Moreover, Western blot analysis of the 1731 proteins with anti-Gag or anti-Pol antibodies in gonads revealed that the 1731 mRNA could be translated differentially according to the expressing tissue: essentially, ovarian translation and/or processing of 1731 products is different from that operating in testes, where the Gag-Pol fusion polyprotein is the most prominent product. Our results indicate that expression of the 1731 mobile element is regulated not only at the transcriptional level but also at the translational level, and that this regulation is different in the two sexes.