Application of Collis gastroplasty to the management of esophageal atresia

Post-esophageal atresia repair double acquired tracheoesophageal fistulas treated successfully by gastric transposition: a case report

Background

Postoperative recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is a frequent complication in the repair of esophageal atresia (EA). Based on the recent etiologic classification, a TEF that develops in a different new pathway from the original one is categorized as an acquired TEF. The TEFs that fall into this category have been reported to be refractory and their mechanisms have not been fully understood. Here, we report the complicated case of an acquired TEF derived from mediastinitis after the original TEF repair developed an anastomotic stricture. The TEF contained double fistulas, both towards the right lobe bronchi, and was repaired by gastric transposition through a retrosternal route.

Case presentation

The patient was diagnosed with Gross C esophageal atresia after birth and underwent tracheoesophageal fistula banding during the neonatal period. He experienced an intractable anastomotic stenosis after surgery which was treated with repeated balloon dilation therapy. By the age of 11 months, he developed a mediastinal abscess that improved with conservative treatment. At 18 months old, a fistula from the esophagus to the right superior lobe bronchus was identified. The patient underwent a right upper lobectomy to resect the fistula. However, at 21 months old, another fistula to the right lower lobe was revealed. An esophageal banding was done to relieve the respiratory symptoms. This was followed by esophagectomy and gastric transposition through the retrosternal route at 26 months old. The patient started rehabilitation and oral intake gradually after surgery. By 3 years after gastric transposition, he could already take blended food orally with the support of small amounts of enteral feeding.

Conclusion

Cases of TEF derived from severe inflammation have the potential to form a complicated network and lead to recurrence. Surgeons should consider the possibility of multiple tiny fistulas in cases of severe acquired TEF. These may be repaired successfully by gastric transposition through the retrosternal route.

Location of TEF at the carina as an indicator of long-gap C-type esophageal atresia

We analyzed retrospectively the outcomes in long gap Gross type C esophageal atresia. We hypothesized that outcomes in type C (long gap) atresia differ from type C (normal gap) and be similar with outcomes in Gross type A and B esophageal atresia. Location of the distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) at the carina was chosen as the hallmark of type C atresia (long gap). We compared the type of esophageal repair, major reoperations for anastomotic complications and gastroesophageal reflux, and long-term mucosal changes between type C (normal gap), type C (long gap), and type A/B. We analyzed the hospital charts of 247 successive patients from 1984 to 2014 who either underwent repair of esophageal atresia in our institution (n = 232) or were referred from elsewhere because of anastomotic complications (n = 15). Among the 232 patients of our institution, 181 had type C and 21 type A or B esophageal atresia. Twenty-two (12%) of type C patients had TEF at the carina and were considered as type C (long gap). The referred patients included a disproportionately high number (42%) of patients with type C (long gap). We attempted primary anastomosis in 98% of patients with type C (normal gap), in 95% with type C (long gap), and 53% with type A/B underwent delayed primary anastomosis. Leakage after primary anastomosis occurred in 40% of patients with type A/B and in 23% with type C (long gap) compared with 6% in patients with type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). Recalcitrant anastomotic stricture that eventually required esophageal resection occurred in 30% of patients with type A/B and in 18% with type C (long gap) compared with 3% in patients with type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). The overall rate of major reoperations for anastomotic complications after primary anastomosis, type A/B (36%), type C (long gap) (27%), and antireflux surgery, type A/B (100%) and type C (long gap) (61%) were higher than in type C (normal gap), (9% and 24%), (P < 0.05 in both). Ten (47%) patients with type A/B esophageal atresia (primary anastomosis not possible n = 10), three (14%) with type C (long gap) (primary anastomosis not possible n = 1, significant loss of esophageal length after complications n = 2) and two (1%) with type C (normal gap) (significant loss of esophageal length after complications n = 2) underwent esophageal reconstruction. Endoscopic follow-up, median length 7.0 (IQR: 3.0-14) years, disclosed gastric metaplasia in 31% and 33% of patients with type A/B and type C (long gap) compared with 11% in type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). Intestinal metaplasia was found in one patient type C (normal gap) (0.7%) and one with type C (long gap) (5.6%), (P = 0.21), only. The outcomes of type C (long gap) esophageal atresia are associated with more frequent complications, gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal mucosal changes than outcomes in type C (normal gap). Outcomes in type C (long gap) esophageal atresia resemble those in type A/B. The percentage of patients who remain with their native esophagus is, however, higher in type C (long gap) atresia (86%) than in type A/B (53%).

Complications in neonatal surgery

Neonatal surgery is recognized as an independent discipline in general surgery, requiring the expertise of pediatric surgeons to optimize outcomes in infants with surgical conditions. Survival following neonatal surgery has improved dramatically in the past 60 years. Improvements in pediatric surgical outcomes are in part attributable to improved understanding of neonatal physiology, specialized pediatric anesthesia, neonatal critical care including sophisticated cardiopulmonary support, utilization of parenteral nutrition and adjustments in fluid management, refinement of surgical technique, and advances in surgical technology including minimally invasive options. Nevertheless, short and long-term complications following neonatal surgery continue to have profound and sometimes lasting effects on individual patients, families, and society.

Modified Collis-Nissen procedure for long gap pure esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Esophageal reconstruction in long gap esophageal atresia (EA) is technically challenging, and several procedures have been described. The purpose of this study is to review our experience with the modified Collis-Nissen procedure in the repair of long gap pure EA.

METHODS

Six patients with pure EA were treated at our institution from 1985 to 2008. Patients' demographics, surgical technique, timing of repair, early and late complications, and long-term functional outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Five primary cases and 1 redo case were included. The mean gap length was 5.3 vertebral bodies (range, 4-6). Modified Collis-Nissen procedure was performed at a mean age of 11.6 months (range, 9-14 months) in primary cases. There was 1 anastomotic leak in the redo case, which healed spontaneously. Two patients had anastomotic strictures requiring balloon dilatations. Patients were weaned from tube feeding at a mean duration of 4 months (range, 1-6 months) postoperatively. All patients have normal oral intake at the last follow-up visit. Two adult patients had normal growth and development and no digestive symptoms. Endoscopic examination and pH monitoring showed no signs of significant gastroesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified Collis-Nissen procedure is a good option to consider in patients with long gap pure EA and is associated with an acceptable complication rate and promising short- and long-term results.

An exclusively intraabdominal distal esophageal segment prevents primary delayed anastomosis in children with pure esophageal atresia

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of children with pure esophageal atresia (EA) managed by the strategy of delayed primary anastomosis and to find parameters to identify which of these children will have satisfactory esophageal growth to permit a successful primary esophageal anastomosis.

METHODS

Sixteen children with pure EA were treated by delayed anastomosis strategy from June 1992 to May 2001 at the Instituto da Criança-University of São Paulo Medical School. The treatment consisted of creating an early feeding gastrostomy, continuous upper pouch suction, and periodic radiologic/endoscopic assessments of the gap between the superior and inferior esophageal pouches. The first assessment was done 4 weeks after the initial gastrostomy. Subsequent assessments were done, when necessary, 4 to 10 weeks after the first one. Children with the gap between the pouches corresponding to 2 vertebral bodies or less were considered for primary repair.

RESULTS

The waiting period ranged from 8 to 14 weeks. Five children were considered for primary repair (31.3%). All of them had an end-to-end esophageal anastomosis performed without tension. Eleven children (68.7%) did not show significant esophageal growth after the waiting period and were not considered for primary esophageal anastomosis. Eight of them (50%) showed an entirely intraabdominal distal pouch at the first assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Infants with an exclusively intraabdominal distal pouch at the first evaluation will not reach sufficient elongation of the pouches and should be considered early as a candidate for esophageal replacement. (2) Combined radiologic/endoscopic assessment and the measurement of the gap in terms of vertebral bodies is a practical and reliable method to predict the feasibility of primary anastomosis. (3) Using these criteria, primary anastomosis could be accomplished in less than a third of cases.

Early primary repair of long gap esophageal atresia: the VATER operation

Despite the numerous approaches described for the management of neonates with "long gap" esophageal atresia, controversy still exists as to the preferred method. Delayed primary anastomosis is probably the most frequently adopted practice, but often the native esophagus is abandoned, and the long gap is bridged by some form of esophageal replacement. A case is reported of a 1.38-kg newborn with pure esophageal atresia and a long gap undergoing early primary repair. The technique used in this patient and the various options available for management of long-gap esophageal atresia are discussed.

Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: surgical experience over two decades

BACKGROUND

Despite improvements in survival, for infants born with esophageal atresia tracheoesophageal fistula, or both, the morbidity associated with repair of these anomalies remains high.

METHODS

This report retrospectively analyzes 81 patients with esophageal atresia, tracheoesophageal fistula, or both presenting to our institution between 1975 and 1995, with a focus on anastomotic complications.

RESULTS

There were 46 male and 35 female patients with a mean gestational age of 37 weeks and mean birth weight of 2443 g. Forty-four patients underwent primary esophageal anastomoses, 7 underwent delayed primary anastomoses, 12 patients underwent staged repairs, and 5 underwent repair of H-type fistulas. Among 62 patients with anastomoses, complications included stricture in 25/62 patients (40%), leakage in 12/62 patients (19%), and recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas in 6/62 patients (10%). Stricture rates for esophagoclonic anastomoses versus esophagoesophageal anastomoses were 4/8 cases (50%) versus 21/54 cases (39%). This difference was not statistically significant. All esophagoesophageal strictures were managed successfully with dilations; three of four esophagocolonic strictures required anastomotic revision. The leakage rate for esophagocolonic anastomoses versus esophagoesophageal anastomoses was 6/8 cases (75%) versus 6/54 cases (11%). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0003). Two patients required revision of their colon grafts secondary to necrosis. Eighteen of 81 patients (22%) died. Operative mortality was 9/74 (12%). Causes of death included associated anomalies (n = 15), recurrent aspiration and sepsis secondary to missed fistula (n = 1), and unknown (n = 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the morbidity associated with surgical repair of these anomalies is high, this does not affect the overall survival. The high complication rate associated with colonic interposition suggests that one should preserve the native esophagus as a primary conduit whenever feasible.