The action of phosphodiesterase inhibitors on the hypersensitivity of frog photoreceptor

Light-adaptation attenuates the effects of phosphodiesterase blockade by Zaprinast in the isolated rat retina

The effect of the type V/VI-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor, Zaprinast, (200 microM) on the light-evoked extracellular field potential (EFP) in the isolated rat retina was tested under dark- and light-adapted conditions at two different temperatures. Peak enhancement EFP in dark- (344 +/- 70%; mean +/- SEM) and light-adapted (182 +/- 31%) retina at 37 degrees C was reached within 3 min of treatment with Zaprinast (200 microM) followed by a slower decrease to a level of 85 +/- 14 and 26 +/- 7% in dark- and light-adapted retina, respectively. The effect of Zaprinast (20 microM) on the pharmacologically-isolated photoreceptor component of the EFP was lost with increasing levels of background light. This may suggest that there is a slow time scale (minutes) shift in the steady state level of cGMP during light-adaptation.

Sildenafil, N-desmethyl-sildenafil and Zaprinast enhance photoreceptor response in the isolated rat retina

Here we report that the active component of Viagra, Sildenafil and the first metabolite, N-desmethyl-sildenafil (UK-103, 320) increased the amplitude of flash-evoked electroretinogram (ERG) of dark-adapted albino rat retina. Effects of Sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil were comparable to those of the known phosphodiesterase inhibitor, Zaprinast. The photoreceptor cell response was isolated by blocking the glial K(+) ion-buffering and the on-bipolar components of the ERG with the use of BaCl(2) (500 microM) and the specific type VI metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist, DL-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (25 microM), respectively. Zaprinast, Sildenafil and N-desmethyl-sildenafil (1 microM each) increased the amplitude of photoreceptor cell response either. Besides, Sildenafil was significantly more effective than N-desmethyl-sildenafil. These findings suggest an increased sensitivity of photoreceptor cells in the presence of Sildenafil and it is metabolite.

Are eating disorders culture-bound syndromes? Implications for conceptualizing their etiology

The authors explore the extent to which eating disorders, specifically anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), represent culture-bound syndromes and discuss implications for conceptualizing the role genes play in their etiology. The examination is divided into 3 sections: a quantitative meta-analysis of changes in incidence rates since the formal recognition of AN and BN, a qualitative summary of historical evidence of eating disorders before their formal recognition, and an evaluation of the presence of these disorders in non-Western cultures. Findings suggest that BN is a culture-bound syndrome and AN is not. Thus, heritability estimates for BN may show greater variability cross-culturally than heritability estimates for AN, and the genetic bases of these disorders may be associated with differential pathoplasticity.

The effect of lead on photoreceptor response amplitude--influence of the light stimulus

The mass receptor potential of the excised, superfused retina of the bullfrog was studied. Photoreceptor responses were isolated by addition of sodium aspartate to the Ringer solutions. Responses of the cones were monitored independently from responses of the rods by employing a two-flash method of stimulation which took advantage of the very different rates of rapid dark adaptation of rods and of cones. Stimulation with paired flashes of white light at regular intervals caused enhancement of rod response amplitude in that the response grew larger with subsequent flashes until reaching a stable plateau. The degree of enhancement was directly proportional to the amount of light exposure and increased with either increasing stimulus intensity or decreasing stimulus interval. Only the rod response was affected; the cone response was not enhanced by continued stimulation. The effects of 12.5 microM PbCl2 on rod response amplitude were complex. There was a small (less than 10%) but consistent depression of rod response amplitude even when the rods were in the unenhanced state. However, the most striking effect of lead was on the enhanced response, where treatment with 12.5 microM PbCl2 led to a depression of about 33%. When added prior to light stimulation, lead significantly decreased the degree to which the rod response could be enhanced, but never prevented enhancement entirely. Removal of lead resulted in a very large increase in the degree to which the rod response was enhanced by light, even when compared to the first, lead-free control. The cone response was unaffected by 12.5 microM PbCl2.