Major tranquillisers used as antidepressants. A review

Antipsychotic Monotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), no meta-analysis has examined this topic. We conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE and Embase to identify relevant RCTs and performed a meta-analysis to compare the following outcomes between APM and placebo: response and remission rates, study discontinuation due to all causes, lack of efficacy, and adverse events, changes in total scores on depression severity scales, and individual adverse event rates. A total of 13 studies were identified, with 14 comparisons involving 3,197 participants that met the eligibility criteria. There were significant differences between APM and placebo in response and remission rates and changes in the primary depression severity scale in favor of APM, and study discontinuation due to adverse events and several individual adverse events in favor of placebo. No significant difference was observed in discontinuation due to all causes. APM could have antidepressant effects in the acute phase of MDD, although clinicians should be aware of an increased risk of some adverse events.

The Care of Patients With Complex Mood Disorders

This article focuses on some common dilemmas facing clinicians, patients, and families in managing the treatment of complicated mood disorders. Specifically, this article reviews the interaction of depressive states, including unipolar, bipolar, and mixed, with other adversities, including comorbid physical and psychological disorders, personality vulnerabilities, misuse of drugs and alcohol, and social and family problems. These issues are not always clearly differentiated from the depressive illness. Each of these adversities can worsen an existing mood disorder and influence the patient's resolve to persist with a treatment plan. Although this article is not focused strictly on treatment-resistant depression, these coexisting issues make depressive states harder to manage therapeutically. For brevity, the aim of this article has been limited to discussion of some complex situations that psychiatrists in general practice may encounter.

Treating depression with adjunctive antipsychotics

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using adjunctive antipsychotics in patients with major depressive disorder.

METHOD

Studies published since the last Cochrane review conducted in 2010 were identified via a literature search of recognised databases, using the keywords "adjunct*", "augment*", "antipsychotic" and "depression", and systematically evaluated. A targeted review of relevant guidelines was undertaken.

RESULTS

Adjunctive antipsychotics produce a small but significant improvement in depressive symptoms in most studies. Most of the studies focussed on patients with an inadequate response to antidepressants rather than patients with treatment resistant depression. Treatment guidelines were variable but generally supported the use of adjunctive antipsychotics while cautioning about the risk of side effects. Most were non-specific about the length of time adjunctive antipsychotics should be prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies do not support the routine use of adjunctive antipsychotics in patients with an inadequate response to antidepressants. They may be beneficial when used short-term in patients with treatment resistant depression who have specific symptoms (severe ruminations, melancholia, major sleep disturbance) that appear to respond well to adjunctive antipsychotics. There is no support for long-term use. Research should focus on specifying which symptom profiles are responsive and how adjunctive antipsychotics compare to other strategies in treatment resistant depression.

Antidepressant combination versus antidepressants plus second-generation antipsychotic augmentation in treatment-resistant unipolar depression

Patients with treatment-resistant unipolar depression (TRD) are treated with antidepressant combinations (ADs) or with second-generation antipsychotics plus AD (SGA+AD) augmentation; however, the clinical characteristics, the factors associated independently with response to SGA+AD, and the outcome trajectories have not yet been characterized. We performed a naturalistic study on the latest stable trial (medication unchanged for about 3 months) in 86 TRD patients with resistance to at least two ADs trials, who received ADs (n=36) or SGA+AD (n=50) treatments. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17), and other scales were administered before (T0) and after the latest 3-month stable trial (T3). Compared to ADs, the SGA+AD group showed increased percentage of depression with psychotic features, comorbidity for personality disorders and substance use disorders (SUD), higher number of failed ADs pharmacotherapies and depressive symptoms at T0 on all scales (P<0.001). Compared to T0, both treatments significantly decreased depressive symptoms on MADRS and HAM-D17 at T3 (P<0.001); however, the SGA+AD augmentation produced a greater decline in mean score. Logistic regression analysis indicated that psychotic features, personality disorders, and SUD were independently associated with SGA+AD treatment. Given the greater improvement in depression following SGA+AD augmentation, SGA augmentation should be indicated as a first-line treatment in severe TRD with psychotic features, SUD, and personality disorders.

Depression treatment by withdrawal of short-term low-dose antipsychotic, a proof-of-concept randomized double-blind study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Because increased dopamine neurotransmission occurs with most antidepressants, and because antipsychotics cause behavioural supersensitivity to dopamine, short-term low-dose antipsychotic treatment was tested on depressed patients with an expectation of clinical improvement in the supersensitive phase following drug withdrawal.

METHOD

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 48 patients who met criteria for DSM-IV(®) Major Depressive Disorder, were in a Major Depressive Episode, and had a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) rating of ≥14. Half the participants received 0.25mg oral haloperidol each day for 7 days, after which they received placebo daily for 4 weeks. The other half received placebo throughout the trial.

RESULTS

One week after stopping the medication, the HAMD ratings of the drug-treated patients fell by 9.96 points, as compared to a reduction of 8.73 points in the placebo-treated patients, when comparing visits 1 and 4. There was no such difference when comparing visits 2 and 4. The differences were not significant, but indicated a trend. One week after the medication was stopped, the Clinical Global Index fell 1.64±0.18 units for the medication-treated patients, compared to 1.12±0.26 units for the placebo group (P=0.05). The regimen was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Seven days of an ultra-low dose of 0.25mg haloperidol, followed by withdrawal of haloperidol, resulted in clinical depression improvement greater than placebo and significantly decreased psychomotor retardation, consistent with haloperidol-induced behavioural supersensitivity to dopamine.

LIMITATIONS

The sample was small. More patients are needed in a future study.

Use of antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders

Summary

There is a long history of using antipsychotic medications in the treatment of depressive disorders. Atypical antipsychotics, which have fewer side effects than traditional antipsychotics, have been used as monotherapy or adjunctively with antidepressants to treat depressive disorders with or without psychotic symptoms. The antidepressant effect of atypical antipsychotics involves regulation of monoamine, glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), cortisol, and neurotrophic factors. To date, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) has approved aripiprazole and quetiapine slow-release tablets as adjunctive treatment for depressive disorders, and the combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression. When using atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of depressed patients, clinicians need to monitor patients for the emergence of adverse effects including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), weight gain, and hyperglycemia.

The psychoactive effects of psychiatric medication: the elephant in the room

The psychoactive effects of psychiatric medications have been obscured by the presumption that these medications have disease-specific actions. Exploiting the parallels with the psychoactive effects and uses of recreational substances helps to highlight the psychoactive properties of psychiatric medications and their impact on people with psychiatric problems. We discuss how psychoactive effects produced by different drugs prescribed in psychiatric practice might modify various disturbing and distressing symptoms, and we also consider the costs of these psychoactive effects on the mental well-being of the user. We examine the issue of dependence, and the need for support for people wishing to withdraw from psychiatric medication. We consider how the reality of psychoactive effects undermines the idea that psychiatric drugs work by targeting underlying disease processes, since psychoactive effects can themselves directly modify mental and behavioral symptoms and thus affect the results of placebo-controlled trials. These effects and their impact also raise questions about the validity and importance of modern diagnosis systems. Extensive research is needed to clarify the range of acute and longer-term mental, behavioral, and physical effects induced by psychiatric drugs, both during and after consumption and withdrawal, to enable users and prescribers to exploit their psychoactive effects judiciously in a safe and more informed manner.

Combination pharmacotherapy in unipolar depression

It is estimated that between 60 and 80% of those with major depressive disorder do not achieve full symptomatic remission from first-line antidepressant monotherapy. Residual depressive symptoms substantially impair quality of life and add to the risk of recurrence. It is now clear that depression would benefit from more vigorous treatment, in order to ameliorate its disease burden. While there are established algorithms in situations of treatment resistance, the use of combination pharmacotherapy in unipolar depression is a relatively under-investigated area of treatment and may be an effective and tolerable strategy that maximizes the available resources. This paper reviews the current evidence for combination pharmacotherapy in unipolar depression and discusses its clinical applications.

The varieties of depressive experience: diagnosing mood disorders

Biopsychosocial eclecticism has led, the authors believe, to a simplistic acceptance of a unitary view of MDD with little scientific solidity. The authors propose a return to careful psychopathology as the basis of all nosology, which has led to identifying four main types of depressive illness, and a method-based, existential approach to understanding depression.

Functional potencies of dopamine agonists and antagonists at human dopamine D₂ and D₃ receptors

We measured the functional agonist potencies of dopamine agonists including antiparkinson drugs, and functional antagonist potencies of antipsychotics at human dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors. In vitro pharmacological assessment included inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and the reversal of dopamine-induced inhibition in clonal Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing low and high densities of human dopamine D(2L) and D(2S) receptors (hD(2L)-Low, hD(2L)-High, hD(2S)-Low and hD(2S)-High, respectively) and human dopamine D(3) Ser-9 and D(3) Gly-9 receptors (hD(3)-Ser-9 and hD(3)-Gly-9, respectively). Cabergoline, bromocriptine, pergolide, (±)-7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT), talipexole, pramipexole, R-(+)-trans-3,4,4a,10b-tetrahydro-4-propyl-2H,5H-[1]benzopyrano[4,3-b]-1,4-oxazin-9-olhydrochloride (PD128907) and ropinirole behaved as dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptor full agonists and showed higher potencies in hD(2L)-High and hD(2S)-High compared to hD(2L)-Low and hD(2S)-Low. In hD(3)-Ser-9 and hD(3)-Gly-9 compared to hD(2L)-Low and hD(2S)-Low, dopamine, ropinirole, PD128907, and pramipexole potencies were clearly higher; talipexole and 7-OH-DPAT showed slightly higher potencies; pergolide showed slightly lower potency; and, cabergoline and bromocriptine potencies were lower. Aripiprazole acted as an antagonist in hD(2L)-Low; a low intrinsic activity partial agonist in hD(2S)-Low; a moderate partial agonist in hD(3)-Ser-9 and hD(3)-Gly-9; a robust partial agonist in hD(2L)-High; and a full agonist in hD(2S)-High. Amisulpride, sulpiride and perphenazine behaved as preferential antagonists; and chlorpromazine and asenapine behaved as modest preferential antagonists; whereas fluphenazine, haloperidol, and blonanserin behaved as non-preferential antagonists in hD(2S)-Low and hD(2S)-High compared to hD(3)-Ser-9 and hD(3)-Gly-9. These findings may help to elucidate the basis of therapeutic benefit observed with these drugs, with varying mechanisms of action, in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, depression and schizophrenia.

Olanzapine augmentation of milnacipran for stage 2 treatment-resistant major depression: an open study

OBJECTIVE

Olanzapine augmentation of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is an effective augmentation therapy for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, studies of olanzapine augmentation of other antidepressants are few. We investigated the efficacy and safety of olanzapine augmentation of milnacipran, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, for TRD.

METHODS

This study covered patients with stage 2 TRD, defined by Thase and Rush. Olanzapine was added to milnacipran, and its dosage was adjusted according to each patient. Previous treatments were continued, but no new treatments were allowed. Response was measured using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) and Clinical Global Impression at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8.

RESULTS

Eleven patients aged 53.2 ± 24.0 years received olanzapine at 5.0 ± 1.9 mg/day with milnacipran. HAMD and Clinical Global Impression scores improved significantly from baseline to endpoint. This improvement occurred in week 1. At endpoint, seven of 11 (64%) were responders on HAMD (≥ 50% reduction). Four patients (36%) discontinued the trial because of no efficacy. No severe adverse effect occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Olanzapine augmentation of milnacipran for stage 2 TRD might be effective and well tolerated. However, our study is open label and uncontrolled. Therefore, a double-blind controlled trial is necessary to confirm our results.

Challenging conventional models of psychiatric drug therapy: an alternative patient-centered approach

Modern psychopharmacology is based on the presumption that psychiatric drugs work by helping to correct an underlying abnormal brain state, or a chemical imbalance. For this article, i have termed this the disease-centered model of psychiatric drug action. Educational and advertising campaigns that have promoted this notion have resulted in soaring rates of use of drugs such as antidepressants and antipsychotics. However, drug action has not always been understood in these terms. This article challenges the disease-centered model of psychiatric drug action, and presents an alternative drug-centered view. The drug-centered model is based on the understanding that psychiatric drugs have psychoactive properties. They produce altered, drug-induced states in the individuals who take them, which may suppress the symptoms of mental disorders. Greater knowledge regarding the drug-induced effects of psychiatric drugs would help patients and prescribers to assess the pros and cons of drug treatment more accurately, and to use drugs more effectively. Further implications of this view are discussed.

Trussed in evidence? Ambiguities at the interface between clinical evidence and clinical practice

This article considers the dominance that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotropic agents currently have in relation to the practice of psychiatry in mental health and primary care settings. In contemporary psychiatry, data of marginal significance based on rating scale measures are privileged as evidence that treatments are effective, while judgments of drug effects based on clinical practice are downgraded. The dominance of RCTs has also led to an increasing promotion of rating scales in clinical practice, described here as ;rating scale mongering.' The logical consequence of current interpretations of RCT data is that clinicians should adhere to guidelines which are based on a systematic assembly of such data, but the selective publication of trial data and ghostwriting of publications, lays the basis for guideline capture, and a corresponding capture of evidence-based clinical practice by pharmaceutical companies.

Quetiapine augmentation in depressed patients with partial response to antidepressants

OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials suggest between 30-50% of depressed patients have an inadequate outcome to antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Among the approaches to improve outcome has been augmentation with antipsychotic medications. We aim to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of augmentation with quetiapine in depressed patients with a partial response to antidepressants.

METHODS

Patients with a Major Depressive Disorder (DSMIV) who had partial/no response to a stable dose of an Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI)/SNRI were recruited. All patients received add-on quetiapine (200-600 mg nocte) in a 6-week trial. Outcome measures (HAMD, MADRS) were assessed at screening, baseline, weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6. Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSEs) were assessed at baseline, weeks 2, 4 and 6. A neuropsychological battery of tests was administered at baseline, weeks 3 and 6.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients entered the trial and 18 completed the trial per protocol. We report a rapid improvement in depression ratings over 6 weeks (p < 0.0005) and remission rates of 67% at week 1 and 94% at week 6. There was no evidence of EPSE and no worsening (and some improvement) of cognition.

CONCLUSION

This suggests clinical benefits of quetiapine augmentation of SSRI/SNRI antidepressants with no worsening, and possible improvements in cognition.

Potentiation of the antidepressant-like effect of fluoxetine by aripiprazole in the mouse tail suspension test

We examined the effect of the novel atypical antipsychotic drug aripiprazole alone or in combination with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine in the mouse tail suspension test. We also investigated the effect of aripiprazole on glucose metabolism. Combined treatment with aripiprazole and a sub-effective dose of fluoxetine significantly decreased the duration of immobility in the tail suspension test. Aripiprazole by itself did not affect the duration of immobility. While olanzapine significantly increased blood glucose level in the glucose tolerance test, aripiprazole did not affect glucose metabolism. We suggest that aripiprazole augments the antidepressant-like effect of fluoxetine without affecting glucose metabolism.

The primacy of mania: a reconsideration of mood disorders

In contemporary psychiatry, depression and mania are conceived as different entities. They may occur together, as in bipolar disorder, or they may occur separately, as in unipolar depression. This view is partly based on a narrow definition of mania and a rather broad definition of depression. Generally, depression is seen as more prominent, common, and problematic; while mania appears uncommon and treatment-responsive. We suggest a reversal: mania viewed broadly, not as simply episodic euphoria plus hyperactivity, but a wide range of excitatory behaviors; and depression seen more narrowly. Further, using pharmacological and clinical evidence, and in contrast to previous theories of mania interpreted as a flight from depression, we propose the primacy of mania hypothesis (PM): depression is a consequence of the excitatory processes of mania. If correct, current treatment of depressive illness needs revision. Rather than directly lifting mood with antidepressants, the aim would be to suppress manic-like excitation, with depression being secondarily prevented. Potential objections to, and empirical tests of, the PM hypothesis are discussed.

Augmentation of antidepressants with atypical antipsychotics: a review of the current literature

Studies have found that a large percentage of depressed patients may have limited response and remission rates when treated with traditional antidepressants. Options for augmenting antidepressant treatment include buspirone, lithium, and triiodothyronine. There are also increasing data concerning the use of atypical antipsychotics as augmenting agents in the treatment of unipolar, nonpsychotic, treatment-resistant depression. Aripiprazole has recently received an indication from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adjunctive treatment in unipolar, nonpsychotic depression, the first indication of its kind, after two double-blind trials; doses were slightly lower than those recommended for monotherapy in schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Olanzapine and risperidone have several controlled clinical trials indicating the efficacy of both of these agents, generally at low doses. One trial of quetiapine suggested that it may not be effective in the treatment of unipolar, nonpsychotic depression. One open-label trial of ziprasidone indicated some efficacy. According to these results, aripiprazole, olanzapine, and risperidone are reasonable choices as augmentation agents, with only aripiprazole currently having an FDA indication for this use. Given the preliminary results, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with quetiapine and ziprasidone are needed, as well as studies comparing atypical antipsychotic agents with traditional augmentation agents in the treatment of depression.

Augmentation strategies for depression: history and concepts

Depression is one of the world's great public health problems. As there are no perfect or uniformly effective treatments for depression, it is not surprising that treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is likewise an important public health problem. Although the potential benefits of antidepressants are now well documented, no widely used antidepressant can be expected to be effective in more than half the patients who begin to take it. Even under optimal circumstances (ie, a patient who is fully adherent to 12 weeks of treatment), there is only a 60% to 70% chance that the first choice of medication will be effective. The need for effective alternate strategies for TRD, as well as the need for innovations in service delivery systems to ensure those strategies are implemented in a timely manner, are foremost to fully realizing the potential benefits of antidepressant therapies.

Over the years, hierarchies of treatment strategies for TRD have been based on the widespread use of particular treatments, their ease of use, and their safety or complexity. One of the strategies consistently used since its introduction 20 years ago has been augmentation of the ineffective antidepressant by a second medication. The second agent may or may not have antidepressant effects of its own, but when used in combination with a primary antidepressant the agent reliably increases a patient's likelihood of response and symptom remission.

Creating more effective antidepressants: clues from the clinic

Antidepressant medications have eased the suffering of millions of people. In addition to treating depression, antidepressant drugs also treat several anxiety disorders. Unfortunately, there are problematic limitations with antidepressant agents, including a delayed therapeutic response and insufficient efficacy. Emerging evidence shows that atypical antipsychotic agents can be used as augmentation therapy in patients with poor responses to antidepressants. Future drugs combining key features of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotic agents could offer new promise for patients suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and depression.

Do antidepressants cure or create abnormal brain states?

Moncrieff and Cohen argue that psychotropic drugs create abnormal states that may co-incidentally relieve symptoms of mental illness.

Manic/hypomanic symptoms induced by atypical antipsychotics: a review of the reported cases

The widespread use of atypical antipsychotics (APs) in clinical practice has advanced the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia regarding treatment resistant cases as well as the negative symptoms of the disorder. Atypical antipsychotics manifest a favourable side effect profile compared to the conventional APs. Atypical APs are also being used as adjunct therapy or monotherapy in patients with manic episodes of bipolar and schizoaffective disorder as well as in patients with psychotic (delusional) depression. On the other hand, atypical APs are also used in combination with (selective) serotonin reuptake inhibitors [(S) SRIs] in the treatment of resistant depression. Shortly after the introduction of atypical APs several cases of manic/hypomanic symptoms during treatment with these compounds have been described in the literature. The reported cases and the possible pathogenetic mechanisms involved in their occurrence are reviewed and discussed.

Antidepressant effects assessed using behavior maintained under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) operant schedule

Behavior maintained under a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate (DRL) 72-s operant schedule, which reinforces responses with interresponse times greater than 72 s, exhibits a rather unique sensitivity to antidepressant drugs. Antidepressants from a number of pharmacological classes, including tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, as well as a number of atypical antidepressants and putative antidepressants, reduce response rate and increase reinforcement rate of rats under this schedule. These effects are observed acutely but persist or are augmented with repeated treatment. By contrast, drugs from a number of other psychotherapeutic classes do not, in general, produce similar effects. This includes anxiolytic, sedative, stimulant, opioid, antihistaminic, and anticholinergic drugs, which can produce false positive results in some preclinical tests for antidepressant efficacy. There are conflicting data regarding the utility of DRL behavior for discriminating the effects of antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs. This results in part from methodological differences among studies, but likely also reflects the overlap between the neuropharmacological and clinical effects of some antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs. DRL behavior also has proven useful for identifying neurochemical and neuroanatomical mediators of antidepressant effects on behavior. Consistent with clinical data, it appears that activation of noradrenergic or serotonergic systems provides for parallel means of producing antidepressant-like effects on DRL behavior. Finally, the results of studies using DRL behavior highlight important roles for central beta-1 adrenergic receptors, as well as 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT2A, and 5-HT2C receptors, in the mediation of antidepressant-like behavioral effects.

Rethinking models of psychotropic drug action

Theoretical assumptions about how psychotropic drugs 'work' are rarely discussed explicitly. In a 'disease-centred model,' drugs are believed to work by acting on a disease process. In contrast, in a 'drug-centred model,' the characteristic physiological, behavioural and subjective effects of drugs are used to define drug action. The therapeutic value of a drug stems from the usefulness of these effects in clinical situations. The disease-centred model appears dominant but has weaknesses: (1) it cannot logically justify the use of drugs since major pathophysiological hypotheses were derived from selectively observed actions of drugs; (2) comparisons between drugs believed to have specific effects in certain conditions and drugs thought to have non-specific effects fail to support it; (3) outcome measures for various disorders include items responsive to non-specific drug effects; (4) studies with healthy volunteers describe characteristic drug-induced states independently of a psychiatric diagnosis; (5) animal tests show effects with agents not usually thought of as specific treatments for the conditions modelled by tests. This article offers suggestions to develop a drug-centred model and discusses its potential impact on clinical practice.

La place des antipsychotiques atypiques dans le traitement des syndromes dépressifs

Depression is a frequent symptom in psychiatry, either isolated (major depression) or entangled with other psychiatric symptoms (psychotic depression, depression of bipolar disorders). Many antidepressant drugs are available with different pharmacological profiles from different classes: tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxydase inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI). However, there are some limitations with these drugs because there is a long delay before relief for symptoms, some patients with major depression are resistant to treatment, there is a risk to induce manic symptoms in patients with bipolar disorders and these drugs have no effect on the psychotic symptoms frequently associated to major depression. The leading hypothesis for the search of more efficient new antidepressants has been the amine deficit hypothesis: noradrenaline and/or serotonin deficit and more recently dopamine deficit. Moreover, a dopamine deficit has been also hypothesized as the central mechanism explaining the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. These symptoms are the consequence of a deficit of normal behaviours and include affective flattening, alogia, apathy, avolition and social withdrawal. There is thus a great overlap between symptoms of depression and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Atypical antipsychotics, in contrast with conventional neuroleptics, have been shown to decrease negative symptoms, most probably through the release of dopamine in prefrontal cortex, thus improving psychomotor activity, motivation, pleasure, appetite, etc. The dopamine deficit in cortical prefrontal areas was thus an unifying hypothesis to explain both some symptoms of depression and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Studies in animal confirm this view and show that the association of an atypical antipsychotic drug and an SSRI (olanzapine plus fluoxetine) increases synergistically the release of dopamine in prefrontal areas. Moreover, most of the atypical antipsychotics have a large action spectrum, beyond the only dopamine receptors: their effects on the serotonin receptors--particularly the 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors--suggest that their association to SSRI could be a promising treatment for depression. Indeed, SSRI act mainly by increasing the serotonin level in the synapse, thus leading to a non specific activation of all pre- and post-synaptic serotonin receptors. Among them, 5-HT2A/2C receptors have been involved in some of the unwanted effects of SSRI: agitation, anxiety, insomnia, sexual disorders, etc. The inhibition of these receptors could be thus beneficial for patients treated with SSRI. Amisulpride is an unique atypical antipsychotic that selectively blocks dopamine receptors presynaptically in the frontal cortex, possibly enhancing dopaminergic transmission. The antidepressant effect of amisulpride was shown in dysthymia in many clinical studies versus placebo, tricyclic antidepressants, SSRI or others. However, a shorter delay for symptom relief was not demonstrated for amisulpride as compared to comparative antidepressants. Other atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine), which act on a large variety of receptors, have shown antidepressant effects--mainly in association with SSRI--in different psychiatric diseases: treatment-resistant major depression, major depression with psychotic symptoms and depression of bipolar disorders, with no increase of manic symptoms in this latter case. Moreover, the delay for symptom relief was greatly shortened. More comparative double-blind studies are required to confirm and to precise the antidepressant effects of atypical antipsychotics. Nevertheless, these studies suggest that atypical anti-psychotics could be of great value in depressive conditions reputed for their resistance to treatment with usual antidepressants. Particularly, new strategies emerge that combine atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants for greater efficacy and more rapid relief of depression symptoms.

Therapy of treatment resistant depression: focus on the management of TRD with atypical antipsychotics

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) represents a significant challenge for physicians. About one third of patients with major depressive disorder fail to experience sufficient symptom improvement despite adequate treatment. Despite this high occurrence of TRD there was no general consensus on diagnosis criteria for TRD until 1997 when researchers proposed a model of defining and staging TRD. In 1999, others defined operational criteria for the definition of TRD. Treatment of TRD is commonly separated into pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods. This review gives a short overview of these two methods. The nonpharmacologic methods include psychotherapy, electroconvulsive therapy, and vagus nerve stimulation. Pharmacologic methods include switching to another antidepressant monotherapy, and augmentation or combination with two or more antidepressants or other agents. This review especially focuses on the augmentation of the antidepressant therapy with atypical antipsychotics.

Audit of antipsychotic prescribing in a private psychiatric hospital

OBJECTIVES

There exists a substantial and growing body of evidence suggesting that antipsychotic medications are efficacious in the treatment of many non-psychotic psychiatric disorders. Although indications for the use of antipsychotics (particularly the atypicals) remain relatively narrow in Australia, psychiatrists seem to be using them for an expanding range of disorders in a variety of clinical settings. This has raised issues of cost-effectiveness and methods of funding of these medications. The present study aimed to quantify and describe the patterns of prescribing of antipsychotic medications in a large private psychiatric hospital. Another aim was to compare the findings with other published evidence, and consider the implications of antipsychotic use for current clinical practice in Australia.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the medical records of 100 consecutive patients admitted to a private psychiatric hospital was conducted. The data collected included demographic details, major psychiatric diagnoses, all medications prescribed during the admission and their doses and, in the case of antipsychotics, the target symptoms/conditions for which they were prescribed.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine per cent of inpatients received at least one dose of an antipsychotic during their admission. While all patients with psychotic illnesses were treated with antipsychotics, 57% of patients with primary mood disorders and 40% of patients with a primary anxiety disorder also received an antipsychotic. The most common indications for use of antipsychotics included the treatment of psychotic symptoms, augmentation of antidepressants, relief of anxiety symptoms and lessening of agitation, and control of difficult behaviours (including self-harm and aggression) associated with personality disorders. The most frequently used antipsychotic was olanzapine (22%), followed by chlorpromazine (20%), and quetiapine (14%). Eleven per cent of patients received a combination of two antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic medications were widely used in a private psychiatric inpatient setting for the treatment of non-psychotic disorders. This finding parallels those from other Australian studies of psychotropic prescribing patterns. The issues of clinical utility, cost-effectiveness and benefits of funding of these medications for such wider indications require further study and evaluation.

Enhancing outcomes in the management of treatment resistant depression: a focus on atypical antipsychotics

Clinical trials indicate that over 50% of depressed patients show an inadequate response to antidepressant therapy, and that incomplete recovery from major depressive disorder (MDD) increases the risk of chronicity and recurrence. Recovery, complete remission of symptoms, and a return to baseline psychosocial function, should be the goal of therapy. Poor response to adequate antidepressant treatment has been termed treatment resistant depression (TRD). Issues such as adherence, missed diagnosis of psychotic depression, bipolar disorder, or comorbid anxiety must be investigated as reasons why patients have not responded to initial therapeutic strategies. Beyond ensuring optimal use of the index antidepressant, treatment strategies for TRD include switching to another antidepressant, and augmentation or combination with two or more agents. Since little comparative data exist it is important to consider side-effect burden, partial response, and previous medication history when deciding between strategies. In patients with TRD, adding or augmenting with lithium, tri-iodothyronine or atypical antipsychotics have demonstrated benefits. Augmentation with atypical antipsychotics, including risperidone, olanzapine, ziprasidone, and quetiapine, show promising results in terms of improving remission rates. Other interventions, including non-pharmacologic strategies and investigational physical treatments, have demonstrated some benefits, but availability and patient preference should also be considered. With today's therapeutic alternatives, full remission of depression is an attainable goal. For some patients, combination and augmentation strategies earlier in treatment may increase the likelihood of remission.

Mood-stabilizers: the archeology of the concept

OBJECTIVE

To review the history of 'mood-stabilizing' treatments.

METHOD

We have reviewed primary source data on the origin of the use of current mood-stabilizers.

RESULTS

This historical record on the origins of the mood-stabilizers points to a more ambiguous picture as regards pharmacotherapeutic specificity to bipolar disorders than is commonly conceded.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests a need for alternative formulations of the concept of a mood-stabilizer. An alternative to the currently dominant paradigm is that these agents have treatment effects, which need to be matched more precisely with patients' constitutional types in order to optimize outcomes.

Is antisense an appropriate nomenclature or design for oligodeoxynucleotides aimed at the inhibition of HIV-1 replication?

We have evaluated the specificity and the variation in activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) with regard to factors such as dose-response range, number and choice of experimental controls, backbone modifications of the ODNs, type of cell infection, length of assays, and delivery approach. The highest level of inhibition was achieved in our long-term assay with MOLT-3 cells acutely infected with HIV-1 (IIIB) and treated with free phosphorothioate-modified ODNs (PS-ODNs). The highest level of specificity was observed in our short-term assay with MOLT-3 cells acutely infected with HIV-1 (IIIB) and treated with free PS-ODNs. The highest potency (IC50 level) was observed in our short-term chronic-infection model with (DLS)-delivered ODNs in which the DLS delivery improved the ODN activity up to 106 times compared to the activity of free ODNs. Thus, the near blocking of HIV replication obtained when using PS-ODNs appears because of the addition of extracellular and/or membrane effects. The higher efficacy of PS-ODNs compared to unmodified ODNs, when both are delivered with the DLS system, was demonstrated solely in our short-term assay with MOLT-3 cells. Important variations in the level of sequence specificity were observed and depended on the type of control used and the type of cell assay employed. It seems that all 3 groups of control-tested, random, sense sequence, and non-antisense T30177 ODNs might have distinct activity and, consequently, different modes of action in inhibiting HIV replication. Our data buttress the notion that the contribution of the sequence-specific mediated mode of action is minor compared to the other mechanisms involved in ODN antiviral activity.

Olanzapine augmentation in the treatment of melancholia: the trajectory of improvement in rapid responders

It has been suggested that the atypical antipsychotic drugs may induce a rapid improvement in individuals with melancholic depression. This might reflect a specific or non-specific effect on mood and other parameters. To examine this issue, ten consecutive patients, for whom olanzapine augmentation was judged a clinically appropriate strategy, were asked to complete daily ratings of depression severity and component features for 1 week. Of the six rapid responders, there was a 52% group improvement in the first day and 89% improvement at 1 week. Item analyses suggested the most rapid impact was evident for insomnia, compared to a slower and linear improvement in depressed mood. Such findings may assist in an understanding of the mechanisms underlying augmentation with atypical neuroleptic drugs.

Severe depression: is there a best approach?

A major depressive episode can be categorised as severe based on depressive symptoms, scores on depression rating scales, the need for hospitalisation, depressive subtypes, functional capacity, level of suicidality and the impact that the depression has on the patient. Several biological, psychological and social factors, and the presence of comorbid psychiatric or medical illnesses, impact on depression severity. A number of factors are reported to influence outcome in severe depression, including duration of illness before treatment, severity of the index episode, treatment modality used, and dosage and duration of and compliance with treatment. Potential complications of untreated severe depression include suicide, self-mutilation and refusal to eat, and treatment resistance. Several antidepressants have been studied in the treatment of severe depression. These include tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants, serotonin 5-HT(2) receptor antagonists, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and amfebutamone (bupropion). More recently, atypical antipsychotics have shown some utility in the management of severe and resistant depression. Data on the differential efficacy of TCAs versus SSRIs and the newer antidepressants in severe depression are mixed. Some studies have reported that TCAs are more efficacious than SSRIs; however, more recent studies have shown that TCAs and SSRIs have equivalent efficacy. There are reports that some of the newer antidepressants may be more effective than SSRIs in the treatment of severe depression, although the sample sizes in some of these studies were small. Combination therapy has been reported to be effective. The use of an SSRI-TCA combination, while somewhat controversial, may rapidly reduce depressive symptoms in some patients with severe depression. The combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic drug is promising and may be considered for severe depression with psychotic features. Although the role of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in severe depression has not been adequately studied, a trial of CBT may be considered in severely depressed patients whose symptoms respond poorly to an adequate antidepressant trial, who are intolerant of antidepressants, have contraindications to pharmacotherapy, and who refuse medication or other somatic therapy. A combination of CBT and antidepressants may also be beneficial in some patients. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) may be indicated in severe psychotic depression, severe melancholic depression, resistant depression, and in patients intolerant of antidepressant medications and those with medical illnesses which contraindicate the use of antidepressants (e.g. renal, cardiac or hepatic disease).

Effect of flupenthixol on subjective and cardiovascular responses to intravenous cocaine in humans

The effects of oral flupenthixol and intramuscular (i.m.) flupenthixol decanoate in combination with intravenous (i.v.) cocaine were evaluated in male cocaine abusers. Participants resided at an inpatient research unit for 27 days followed by an 11-day outpatient period. Oral flupenthixol (2.5 or 5.0 mg; p.o.) followed by flupenthixol decanoate (10 or 20 mg; i.m.) and placebo were investigated in individuals who were randomly assigned to one of three groups under double-blind conditions (placebo, low or high dose flupenthixol). During the inpatient period, participants had four fixed cocaine dosing sessions; each session they were administered four doses of i.v. cocaine (approx. 48 mg/70 kg), spaced 14 min apart. These sessions occurred once before medication (baseline phase), once following oral medication (oral phase), and twice following intramuscular medication (IM phase). Out of 23 participants, 18 completed the study; 4 of the 5 non-completers were in the high dose flupenthixol group. Overall, there were few subjective, cardiovascular, or cocaine pharmacokinetic differences between the placebo group and the low dose flupenthixol group, indicating that the low dose of flupenthixol was well tolerated, but ineffective. In the high dose flupenthixol group, two out of seven individuals (29%) experienced a dystonic reaction following oral flupenthixol and were medically discharged. Taken together, these findings indicate that flupenthixol is not a good candidate for treating cocaine abusers.

Are atypical antipsychotic drugs also atypical antidepressants?

OBJECTIVE

To report a case series and review the psychopharmacology of the neuroleptic drugs to suggest that the atypical antipsychotic drugs may have an antidepressant action, at least for those patients with the melancholic subtype.

METHOD

We note the literature suggesting that the older (or typical) antipsychotic drugs were established as having antidepressant activity, describe an open study of some two dozen patients with a treatment-resistant melancholic depression, describe rapid resolution of depression and augmentation benefits associated with commencing an atypical antipsychotic drug in a percentage of subjects, and then review relevant psychopharmacological studies to consider whether there is a rationale for use of antipsychotic drugs to treat depression.

RESULTS

Of some two dozen patients treated with an atypical antipsychotic drug, almost immediate improvement was noted in four patients, and evidence of augmentation benefit obtained in another three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Impressions from this case series are encouraging. However, as open clinical observational studies are problematic, controlled studies are required to establish whether the atypical antipsychotic drugs have a role in the management of certain expressions of depression, and, in particular, treatment-resistant melancholic depression.

Suicide and schizophrenia

Suicide and suicide attempts occur at a significantly greater rate in schizophrenia than in the general population. Common estimates are that 10% of people with schizophrenia will eventually have a completed suicide, and that attempts are made at two to five times that rate. Demographically associated with suicidality in schizophrenia are being young, being early in the course of the illness, being male, coming from a high socioeconomic family background, having high intelligence, having high expectations, not being married, lacking social supports, having awareness of symptoms, and being recently discharged from the hospital. Also associated are reduced self-esteem, stigma, recent loss or stress, hopelessness, isolation, treatment non-compliance and substance abuse. Clinically, the most common correlates of suicidality in schizophrenia are depressive symptoms and the depressive syndrome, although severe psychotic and panic-like symptoms may contribute as well. This review specifically explores the issue of depression in schizophrenia, in relation to suicide, by organizing the differential diagnosis of this state and highlighting their potentially treatable or correctable causes. This differential diagnosis includes both acute and chronic disappointment reactions, the prodrome of an acute psychotic episode, neuroleptic induced akinesia and akathisia, the possibility of direct neuroleptic-induced depression, negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and the possible co-occurrence of an independent depressive diathesis. The potential beneficial roles of 'atypical' antipsychotic agents, including both clozapine and more novel agents, and adjunctive treatment with other psychopharmacological medications are considered, and the important roles of psychosocial factors and interventions are recognized.

Are antidepressants overrated? A review of methodological problems in antidepressant trials

There are no signs that the rapidly escalating use of antidepressants is reducing the burden of depressive disorders. This may be due to the fact that the evidence base for antidepressants is weaker than is commonly assumed. There are a number of methodological problems that may bias the results of clinical trials. Unblinding may inflate the response of people taking an active drug when compared with those taking an inert placebo. Modern measurement techniques may exaggerate the benefit of drug treatment. Excluding some randomized subjects from analysis may inflate the apparent effect of antidepressant drugs and publication bias means that published studies may not represent an accurate picture of the effects of treatment. In trials of long-term treatment discontinuation-related effects may masquerade as clinical efficacy. A brief survey of evidence from controlled trials does not present a consistently positive picture. Two of the largest and most reputable trials found only negligible differences between tricyclic antidepressants and placebo. The evidence on whether antidepressants are specific treatments is also inconclusive. Many other drugs not classed as antidepressants have shown positive effects in depression in controlled clinical trials. It is suggested that the interests of the pharmaceutical industry and the psychiatric profession have helped to establish the notion of the efficacy and specificity of antidepressant drugs.

The three faces of the antidepressants: a critical commentary on the clinical-economic context of diagnosis

Depression was infrequently diagnosed before the advent of the antidepressants but has now apparently become a major public health problem. National campaigns are organized aimed at increasing recognition of the condition and at commencing treatment for sufferers. Implicit in these approaches is the premise that treatment will necessarily reduce disability and ultimately lower suicide rates. This is by no means certain. The treatment effect size of many antidepressants is modest, the burden of side effects they produce has never been established, and data on the quality of life during treatment is absent. It remains possible that mild depressive disorders confer a protective effect against suicide and that injudicious or unmonitored treatment may increase that risk. In their concern to help patients, physicians appear to have systematically overlooked the risks they expose patients to as part of their therapeutic effort to minimize the risks posed by the patient's condition. Their propensity to overlook the risks posed by therapy may stem in part from the availability of antidepressant treatments on prescription only. Remedying this situation will require first of all a recognition of the biases that prescription-only status introduces into therapeutics. Current pharmacological and neuroscientific developments have the potential to make alternative health care frameworks possible. Whether these alternatives are adopted will probably depend on the capacity of all interested parties to reform the present arrangements. Future concepts of depressive disorders will probably reflect the regulatory arrangements adopted.

The role of Axis II comorbidity in the management of patients with treatment-resistant depression

A significant proportion of antidepressant nonresponders have personality disorders. The relationship between antidepressant resistance and personality pathology is far from straightforward, however, and reflects a disproportionate "burden" of negative prognostic correlates, psychosocial risk factors, and problems that compromise effective therapeutic relationships. An important clinical ground rule is to avoid the reductionistic logical tautology that explains antidepressant failure as a consequence of personality disorder and, by implication, that the patient may deserve to suffer. In evaluating antidepressant-resistant patients, identification of pathologic personality traits or disorders may help provide important clues for future trials of both pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, particularly in combination.

Behavioural interactions between 5-hydroxytryptophan, neuroleptic agents and 5-HT receptor antagonists in modifying rodent responding to aversive situations

1. The ability of 5-hydroxytryptophan, 5-HT2 receptor antagonists and typical and atypical neuroleptic agents to modify behavioural responding to aversive situations was investigated in the mouse light/dark test and rat social interaction. 2. The administration of 5-hydroxytryptophan inhibited rat social interaction and the exploratory behaviour of mice in the light/dark test. 3. The 5-HT2 receptor antagonists, ketanserin, ritanserin, MDL11939, methysergide and RP62203, the neuroleptic agents, spiperone, haloperidol and benperidol, and the atypical neuroleptic agent, clozapine, when administered alone failed to modify mouse or rat behaviour. In contrast, when administered alone, sulpiride in rats and mice and thioridazine in rats disinhibited behaviour. 4. Methysergide, RP62203, ketanserin, ritanserin and MDL11939 antagonized the inhibitory effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan or reversed the inhibitory effects to one of disinhibition. 5. Low doses of spiperone (but not haloperidol or benperidol) also antagonized the inhibitory effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan in the rat but not the mouse. Higher doses of the three neuroleptic agents caused locomotor depression in both rats and mice which obscured any specific changes in behavioural responding to the aversive situations. 6. The disinhibitory profile of sulpiride in both mice and rats and thioridazine in rats was evident during their interaction with 5-hydroxytryptophan. Thioridazine in the mouse and clozapine in rats and mice also reversed the inhibitory effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan to one of disinhibition. 7. In summary, we present evidence that the atypical neuroleptic agents, thioridazine and clozapine, with their known affinity for the 5-HT2 receptors, can mimic the actions of reference 5-HT2 receptor antagonists to antagonize the inhibitory effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan in rodent models of anxiety. The results are intepreted in terms of drug action on different 5-HT2 and other 5-HT receptor subtypes. In addition, thioridazine and sulpiride have disinhibitory effects in their own right which remain to be explained.

The circadian system and the therapeutics of the affective disorders

Establishing that a circadian rhythm is abnormal tells us little about the cause, which can arise from changes in the patient's lifestyle, irregularities of the body clock or a malfunction in the process of entrainment of the clock. In a clinical context, such a range of possible explanations implies differences in the most appropriate mode of treatment. Against this background, the conventional view that the underlying abnormality in endogenous depression is due to a disorder of the body clock is challenged. The challenge is based on difficulties of interpretation of the clinical data and the results of studies on circadian rhythms in patients. It is suggested that the state of the circadian system in depression resembles its state in healthy individuals after time-zone transitions or in shift work maladaptation syndrome and that this disturbance should be seen as resulting from changes in the phasing of external zeitgebers rather than from an abnormality in the clock itself.

Does learned helplessness induction by haloperidol involve serotonin mediation?

Learned helplessness (LH) is a behavioral depression following inescapable stress. Helpless behavior was induced in naive rats by the dopamine D2 receptor blocker haloperidol (HDL) in a dose-dependent manner, with the greatest effects seen at 20 mg/kg (IP). Rats were tested 24 h after injection. Haloperidol (IP) increased release of serotonin (5-HT) in medial prefrontal cortex (MPC) as measured by in vivo microdialysis. Perfusion of HDL through the probe in MPC caused increased cortical 5-HT release, as did perfusion of both dopamine and the dopamine agonist apomorphine. Our previous work found that increased 5-HT release in MPC correlates with the development of LH. The present work suggests that increased DA release in MPC, known to occur with both inescapable stress and with HDL, may play a necessary but not sufficient role in the development of LH. Also, this suggests that increased DA activity in MPC leads to increased 5-HT release in MPC and to subsequent behavioral depression.

Dopamine and depression

The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia and the emphasis on other neurotransmitters, most notably norepinephrine, serotonin, and acetylcholine, in the pathogenesis of depression, have focused attention away from substantial evidence implicating dopamine in affective disorders. The clinical evidence includes alterations in depressive symptoms with aging (concomitant with possible changes in dopamine metabolism), potential dopaminergic involvement in several subtypes of depression, similarities between some of the symptoms of Parkinson's disease and those of depression (including psychomotor retardation and diminished motivation), and potential dopaminergic abnormalities in seasonal mood disorder. The biochemical evidence in patients with depression derives from studies of homovanillic acid, a dopamine metabolite, indicating diminished dopamine turnover. In addition, there is a considerable amount of pharmacologic evidence regarding the efficacy of antidepressants with dopaminergic effects in the treatment of depression. We conclude that dopamine likely contributes significantly to the pathophysiology of depression. However, the role of dopamine in this syndrome must be understood in the context of existing theories involving other neurotransmitters which may act independently, and interact with dopamine and other neurochemicals, to contribute to depression.

Drug treatment of the personality disorders

Many people with well defined borderline and schizotypal personality disorders may benefit considerably from small doses of neuroleptics. Depression that occurs with personality disorders, which is frequent, responds poorly to tricyclics but may respond better to neuroleptics, while the response to ECT is usually short lived. Selected borderline subjects may respond to MAOIs, particularly where there is a history of childhood hyperactivity. Carbamazepine and lithium may help some individuals with episodic behavioural dyscontrol and aggression, even in the absence of epileptic, affective or organic features. Drug treatments can be combined with psychotherapy, but further placebo-controlled trials are needed to clarify which drugs are most useful, and whether there are any useful clinical predictors of drug responsiveness.

Role of the dopaminergic system in depression

A hypothesis implicating dopamine in depression was proposed over 15 years ago (Randrup et al 1975). The identification of multiple new subtypes of dopamine receptors and evolving views regarding the function of the dopamine systems in the brain require a reexamination of this hypothesis. Results from studies in depression, Parkinson's disease, and animal models of depression suggest a deficiency of dopamine in depression. Dopamine precursors, dopamine agonists, and dopamine reuptake inhibitors show therapeutic efficacy in depression. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and standard pharmacological antidepressants enhance dopamine function. Studies using receptor-specific drugs in clinical trials and neuroimaging studies are needed to further clarify the role of dopamine in depression.

Akinesia: a syndrome common to parkinsonism, retarded depression, and negative symptoms of schizophrenia

A distinct hypokinetic syndrome appears to exist across several different neuropsychiatric diagnoses, involving (1) slowed motor activity with difficulty initiating and sustaining behaviors, (2) anhedonia with depressed mood and reduced affective range, and (3) cognitive impairment. Specifically, three well-recognized states--parkinsonism, retarded depression, and the negative symptoms of schizophrenia--prominently feature the components of this syndrome, and reduced dopamine turnover in the brain has been hypothesized to play a part in the pathophysiology of each. While aspects of this conceptualization remain controversial, it generates testable hypotheses that could have implications for the understanding and treatment of these states.