Human strabismus: evaluation of the interhemispheric transmission time and hemiretinal differences using a reaction time task

Handedness Matters for Motor Control But Not for Prediction

Skilled motor behavior relies on the ability to control the body and to predict the sensory consequences of this control. Although there is ample evidence that manual dexterity depends on handedness, it remains unclear whether control and prediction are similarly impacted. To address this issue, right-handed human participants performed two tasks with either the right or the left hand. In the first task, participants had to move a cursor with their hand so as to track a target that followed a quasi-random trajectory. This hand-tracking task allowed testing the ability to control the hand along an imposed trajectory. In the second task, participants had to track with their eyes a target that was self-moved through voluntary hand motion. This eye-tracking task allowed testing the ability to predict the visual consequences of hand movements. As expected, results showed that hand tracking was more accurate with the right hand than with the left hand. In contrast, eye tracking was similar in terms of spatial and temporal gaze attributes whether the target was moved by the right or the left hand. Although these results extend previous evidence for different levels of control by the two hands, they show that the ability to predict the visual consequences of self-generated actions does not depend on handedness. We propose that the greater dexterity exhibited by the dominant hand in many motor tasks stems from advantages in control, not in prediction. Finally, these findings support the notion that prediction and control are distinct processes.

Reorganization of Visual Callosal Connections Following Alterations of Retinal Input and Brain Damage

Vision is a very important sensory modality in humans. Visual disorders are numerous and arising from diverse and complex causes. Deficits in visual function are highly disabling from a social point of view and in addition cause a considerable economic burden. For all these reasons there is an intense effort by the scientific community to gather knowledge on visual deficit mechanisms and to find possible new strategies for recovery and treatment. In this review, we focus on an important and sometimes neglected player of the visual function, the corpus callosum (CC). The CC is the major white matter structure in the brain and is involved in information processing between the two hemispheres. In particular, visual callosal connections interconnect homologous areas of visual cortices, binding together the two halves of the visual field. This interhemispheric communication plays a significant role in visual cortical output. Here, we will first review the essential literature on the physiology of the callosal connections in normal vision. The available data support the view that the callosum contributes to both excitation and inhibition to the target hemisphere, with a dynamic adaptation to the strength of the incoming visual input. Next, we will focus on data showing how callosal connections may sense visual alterations and respond to the classical paradigm for the study of visual plasticity, i.e., monocular deprivation (MD). This is a prototypical example of a model for the study of callosal plasticity in pathological conditions (e.g., strabismus and amblyopia) characterized by unbalanced input from the two eyes. We will also discuss the findings of callosal alterations in blind subjects. Noteworthy, we will discuss data showing that inter-hemispheric transfer mediates recovery of visual responsiveness following cortical damage. Finally, we will provide an overview of how callosal projections dysfunction could contribute to pathologies such as neglect and occipital epilepsy. A particular focus will be on reviewing noninvasive brain stimulation techniques and optogenetic approaches that allow to selectively manipulate callosal function and to probe its involvement in cortical processing and plasticity. Overall, the data indicate that experience can potently impact on transcallosal connectivity, and that the callosum itself is crucial for plasticity and recovery in various disorders of the visual pathway.

Visual evoked potentials and reaction time measurements to motion-reversal luminance- and texture-defined stimuli

PURPOSE

Previous studies have suggested that compared to first-order (FO) motion stimuli, second-order (SO) motion stimuli required more cortical time to be processed. The purpose of this study was: 1- to verify this claim with Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) and eye-hand Reaction Time (RT) measurements and 2- examine if the VEP and RT responses are similarly modulated by the same trigger features of the stimuli.

METHODS

The VEPs and eye-hand RT for motion-reversal luminance- (first-order) and texture-defined (second-order) stimuli were recorded from ten normal human subjects. VEPs and RTs were measured for each motion class at eight different modulation depths (from 3 to 100%).

RESULTS

Our results reveal that for stimuli of low contrast levels, the SO-FO timing differences are approximately 100 ms (RT) or 20 ms (VEP), while for contrasts >or= 15-20% (VEP) or >or= 50% (RT), the SO-FO difference is no longer significant (p < 0.007), suggesting either that the brain can no longer distinguish SO from FO stimuli or that in spite of the added complexity of SO stimuli the brain takes equal time to process both.

CONCLUSION

Interestingly, the above contrast discrepancy in SO-FO resolution threshold suggests that, compared to the VEP, the more psychophysical RT measurement can process and thus distinguish a larger spectrum of motion stimuli, thus further confirming the latter measure of the retinocortical processing time as a valid alternative to the VEP.

Response characteristics of the normal retino-cortical pathways as determined with simultaneous recordings of pattern visual evoked potentials and simple motor reaction times

PURPOSE

In an attempt to explain the existing discrepancies regarding the relationship between electrophysiological and psychophysical measurements of visual transmission time we compared, in humans, the response characteristics of the normal retino-cortical pathways with simultaneously obtained pattern visual evoked potentials (PVEP) and simple motor reaction times (RT).

METHODS

PVEPs and manual RTs were recorded simultaneously using a reversing checkerboard with different spatial frequency and contrast combinations chosen to elicit responses favoring the magnocellular or parvocellular pathways. The amplitude and peak time of the P1 wave of the PVEP were compared to the mean RT. Other parameters of the RT, such as mode and standard deviation were also considered.

RESULTS

The RT is not modified in the same fashion as the peak time of the P1 wave of the PVEP, the peak time of the PVEP demonstrating a spatial frequency selectivity, while the RT does not. Further comparative analysis of the PVEP and RT shows that the RT is faster for stimuli of lower contrast and spatial frequency, while the PVEP amplitude is larger and its peak time shorter for higher contrast and spatial frequency stimuli.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that PVEP and RT measures recruit distinct physiological characteristics and appear to be differently modulated while travelling along the retino-cortical pathway. Our results also show the importance of obtaining electrophysiological and psychophysical measures concomitantly to insure elimination of combined inter-stimulus and inter-session variability.

Judgements of visual precedence by strabismics

Strabismus induced early in the life of cats results in disruption of the normal development of the posterior corpus callosum. In human strabismic amblyopic subjects a similar disruption in callosal development may cause poor interhemispheric integration of simple visual information. To examine this possibility judgements of visual target onset precedence were made for targets presented in bilateral and unilateral viewing conditions using a method of constants psychophysical procedure. In one condition, with targets presented in opposite visual fields requiring integration between the two hemispheres, the subjects having strabismic amblyopia had significantly larger just noticeable difference values (JNDs) than those found for the non-strabismic controls. In a second condition, with targets presented within a visual field requiring integration within only a single hemisphere, the JNDs for the two groups were not significantly different. The results suggest that strabismic amblyopes have poor integration of visual information between the cerebral hemispheres, and that this reflects disruptions in the development of the posterior corpus callosum.

Hemiretinal contribution to the timing of the full-field PVEP as determined with the motor reaction time

With the use of the simple motor reaction time (RT), we examined the contribution of the hemiretinas to the timing of the pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PVEP). RTs were obtained to the reversal of a progressively dimmer check falling either on the central, nasal, temporal, superior or inferior retina. Results were correlated with the peak time of the P1 wave evoked to the reversal of the entire checkerboard stimulus to the same luminance conditions as that used to generate the RT measurements. Our results clearly indicate that the time taken to trigger a manual response depends not only on the luminance of the stimulus, but also on where it falls on the retina. Comparing the above data with the peak time of the PVEP obtained to the reversal of the entire screen indicates that at brighter luminance the peak time of the P1 wave correlates with that measured from the most central retina, while at dimmer intensities it correlates with the mathematical average of all the retinal locations tested.

Unifying concepts in mechanism of amblyopia

Most of the evidence of formation of amblyopia is derived traditionally from electrophysiological studies. Recently, there have been many discoveries from genetics, histopathology, biochemistry, immunology and interventional studies. On the basis of evidence gathered in the last five years, the various types of amblyopia (strabismic and non-strabismic amblyopia) can be seen not only as disturbance of the development of the visual system at different points but as basically different pathologic processes. It is postulated here that strabismic amblyopia is initiated as a maladaptive differentiation in the ocular dominance columns, whereas the non-strabismic amblyopia may be initiated from the ganglion cell population of the amblyopic eye. The total clinical picture is confusing because of secondary changes in other parts of the central nervous system. The manifested features can be due to a slower, more enduring type of change (pooling, loss and re-wiring of the neurones) as well as a more transient, adaptive type of response (such as suppression of diplopia). Neurotransmitter replacement has a potential therapeutic application.