Cell cycle-related expression of poly(ADP-ribosyl)transferase in proliferating rat thymocytes

Variations in the mRNA expression of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases, poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase and ADP-ribosylhydrolase 3 in breast tumors and impact on clinical outcome

In order to assess the variation in expression of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) family members and the hydrolases that degrade the poly(ADP-ribose) polymers they generate and possible associations with classical pathological parameters, including long-term outcome, the mRNA levels of PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) and ADP-ribosylhydrolase 3 (ARH3) were examined using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 443 unilateral invasive breast cancers and linked to hormonal status, tumor proliferation and clinical outcome. PARP1 mRNA levels were the highest among these five genes in both normal and tumor tissues, with a 2.45-fold higher median level in tumors compared to normal tissues. Tumors (34.1%) showed PARP1 overexpression (>3 fold relative to normal breast tissues) compared to underexpression (<0.33 fold) in only 0.5%. This overexpression was seen in all breast tumor subgroups, with the highest fraction (51%) seen in the HR-positive/ERBB2-positive subgroup and was not highly associated with any other classical predictive factors. No correlation was seen between PARP1 mRNA and PARP-1 protein levels in a subset of 31 tumors. PARP3 was underexpressed in 10.4% of tumors, more frequently in the HR-negative tumors (25.4%) than the HR-positive tumors (5.9%). This PARP3 underexpression was mutually exclusive with a PARP1 overexpression. PARP2 levels were unchanged between normal and tumor tissues and few tumors showed overexpression of PARG (3.8%) or ARH3 (3.4%). Within the subgroup of triple negative tumors, PARG mRNA levels below the median were associated with a higher risk of developing metastases (p = 0.039) raising the possibility this might be marker of clinical outcome.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 polymorphisms, expression and activity in selected human tumour cell lines

Background:

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is a DNA-binding enzyme activated by DNA breaks and involved in DNA repair and other cellular processes. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity can be higher in cancer than in adjacent normal tissue, but cancer predisposition is reported to be greater in individuals with a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) V762A (T2444C) in the catalytic domain that reduces PARP-1 activity.

Methods:

To resolve these divergent observations, we determined PARP-1 polymorphisms, PARP-1 protein expression and activity in a panel of 19 solid and haematological, adult and paediatric human cancer cell lines.

Results:

There was a wide variation in PARP activity in the cell line panel (coefficient of variation, CV=103%), with the lowest and the highest activity being 2460 pmol PAR/10⁶ (HS-5 cells) and 85 750 pmol PAR/10⁶ (NGP cells). Lower variation (CV=32%) was observed in PARP-1 protein expression with the lowest expression being 2.0 ng μg⁻¹ (HS-5 cells) and the highest being 7.1 ng μg⁻¹ (ML-1 cells). The mean activity in the cancer cells was 45-fold higher than the mean activity in normal human lymphocytes and the PARP-1 protein levels were 23-fold higher.

Conclusions:

Surprisingly, there was no significant correlation between PARP activity and PARP-1 protein level or the investigated polymorphisms, T2444C and CA.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is implicated in the G0-G1 transition of resting cells

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, catalysed by a family of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs), plays an important role in a large variety of physiological processes, including cell proliferation, but its role in cell cycle progression is not yet completely defined. As reported here, the examination of early times following serum stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts suggests that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is necessary for the transition from the G0 phase to the G1 phase. We show that PARP activity is involved in this step through the regulation of immediate-early response genes, such as c-Fos and c-Myc. This is supported by the finding that exogenous Myc expression substantially restores cell cycle reactivation in the absence of polymer synthesis. Furthermore, using RNA interference, we show that PARP-1 is the PARP family member playing the most prominent role in the upregulation of c-Fos and c-Myc during G0-G1 transition. We report that even in lectin-stimulated peripheral blood mononucleated cells, the inhibition of PARP activity interferes with the upregulation of immediate-early genes and delays the induction of proliferation, suggesting a general role for PARP-1 in linking growth factor signaling with cell cycle entry.

Nuclear factor 1 interferes with Sp1 binding through a composite element on the rat poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase promoter to modulate its activity in vitro

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) catalyzes the rapid and extensive poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of nuclear proteins in response to DNA strand breaks, and its expression, although ubiquitous, is modulated from tissue to tissue and during cellular differentiation. PARP-1 gene promoters from human, rat, and mouse have been cloned, and they share a structure common to housekeeping genes, as they lack a functional TATA box and contain multiple GC boxes, which bind the transcriptional activator Sp1. We have previously shown that, although Sp1 is important for rat PARP1 (rPARP) promoter activity, its finely tuned modulation is likely dependent on other transcription factors that bind the rPARP proximal promoter in vitro. In this study, we identified one such factor as NF1-L, a rat liver isoform of the nuclear factor 1 family of transcription factors. The NF1-L site on the rPARP promoter overlaps one of the Sp1 binding sites previously identified, and we demonstrated that binding of both factors to this composite element is mutually exclusive. Furthermore, we provide evidence that NF1-L has no effect by itself on rPARP promoter activity, but rather down-regulates the Sp1 activity by interfering with its ability to bind the rPARP promoter in order to modulate transcription of the rPARP gene.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in DNA damage-response pathway: implications for radiation oncology

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) catalyzes the transfer of successive units of ADP-ribose moiety from NAD(+) covalently to itself and other nuclear acceptor proteins. PARP is a zinc finger-containing protein, allowing the enzyme to bind to either double- or single-strand DNA breaks without any apparent sequence preference. The catalytic activity of PARP is strictly dependent on the presence of strand breaks in DNA and is modulated by the level of automodification. Data from many studies show that PARP is involved in numerous biological functions, all of which are associated with the breaking and rejoining of DNA strands, and plays a pivotal role in DNA damage repair. Recent advances in apoptosis research identified PARP as one of the intracellular "death substrates" and demonstrated the involvement of polymerase in the execution of programmed cell death. This review summarizes the biological effects of PARP function that may have a potential for targeted sensitization of tumor cells to genotoxic agents and radiotherapy. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 59-67 (2000).

Evaluation of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene in human stroke

Nitric oxide (NO) and its reactant product, peroxynitrite, have been implied to mediate neuronal damage following cerebral ischemia. However, the cellular targets of these compounds remain unclear. Studies using poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and PARP knock-out mice have recently demonstrated that excessive activation of this nuclear enzyme plays an important role in NO-induced neurotoxicity. To evaluate the relevance of this plausible candidate gene to human stroke, we undertook a case-control study in Japanese. Participants comprised 213 cerebral infarction cases and 374 age- and sex-matched controls. As a primary investigation, we screened polymorphic sites of the PARP gene, and newly identified a total of four polymorphisms in 1230-bp 5'-flanking sequence. None of them were, however, located on the known promoter components of the gene. Two bi-allelic polymorphisms selected and a CA-repeat polymorphism were subsequently characterized in the case-control study, but none were significantly associated with cerebral infarction in the present study. Our data thus suggest that the tested PARP polymorphisms do not principally contribute to cerebral infarction, although extensive searches would be required to clarify whether the PARP gene plays an important role in the pathogenesis of human stroke.

Regulation of the human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase promoter by the ETS transcription factor

Ewing's sarcoma (EWS) cells accumulate elevated steady-state levels of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) mRNA and protein. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying PARP upregulation, we cloned and analysed the 5'-flanking region of the PARP gene from EWS cells. Nucleotide sequence analysis demonstrated no variations in the PARP promoter region in EWS cells. The PARP promoter encompasses multiple binding motifs for the ETS transcription factor. We have also observed that there is a coordinated up-regulation of the expression of both PARP and ETS1, relative to cells of other human tumor types expressing lower levels of PARP. Transient co-expression of ETS1 in EWS cells resulted in a strong enhancement of PARP-promoter activity. The participation of ETS in the regulation of PARP gene expression was further demonstrated in EWS cells stably transfected with Ets1 antisense cDNA constructs. Antisense-mediated down-regulation of endogenous ETS1 resulted in the inhibition of PARP expression in EWS cells, and sensitized these cells to ionizing radiation. These data provide support for ETS regulation of PARP expression levels, and implicate ETS transcription factors in the radiation response of EWS cells.

Phosphorylation of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase protein in human peripheral lymphocytes stimulated with phytohemagglutinin

Intracellular phosphorylation of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase was assayed in streptolysin-O-permeabilized human lymphocytes. Whereas 32P incorporation from [gamma-32P]ATP into immunoprecipitated enzyme protein was undetectable in resting cells, significant phosphorylation of this enzyme was observed in lymphocytes treated with phytohemagglutinin. The phosphorylation of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase in permeabilized cells was not stimulated by phorbol ester, while phorbol-induced phosphorylation of other proteins and of a specific oligopeptide substrate of protein kinase C was observed. However, the specific inhibitory pseudosubstrate peptide of protein kinase C blocked the phosphorylation of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase induced by phytohemagglutinin. Therefore, a potential role of a member of the protein kinase C family in the phytohemagglutinin stimulated intracellular phosphorylation of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase is conceivable.

Transcriptional regulation and autoregulation of the human gene for ADP-ribosyltransferase

Human nuclear poly(ADP-ribosyl)transferase (ADPRT) modifies proteins with branched ADP-ribose-polymers. Various proteins, including ADPRT itself, serve as acceptors for polyADP-ribose. Target proteins include those controlling basic cellular processes such as DNA repair, differentiation and proliferation. Because of the outstanding features of this enzyme: automodification, several functional domains and central role in physiology of the cell, the molecular biology of ADPRT gained wide interest. The promoter structure contains several CCAAT/TATA boxes and SP1 sites. However, there is no CCAAT/TATA box in the neighbourhood of an SP1 site and, thus no obvious site for initiation of transcription. Within this region there are several noteworthy inverted repeats, which by internal basepairing could form two types of cruciform structures. Deletion analysis revealed that these cruciform structures have functional significance. Removal of one type increases the promoter activity, whereas removal of the other diminishes the promoter function. Overexpression of ADPRT from heterologous promoters (MMTV, SV40) leads to repression of the activity of the ADPRT promoter. Indeed, ADPRT was shown to bind specifically to one type of cruciform structure. This specific interaction indicates autorepression of the ADPRT gene: the enzyme ADPRT acts directly as a negative modulator of the activity of its own promoter.