Sequence-specific binding of androgen-receptor complexes to prostatic binding protein genes

Structural mechanism underlying variations in DNA binding by the androgen receptor

The androgen receptor (AR) is a steroid activated transcription factor which recognizes DNA motifs resembling inverted repeats of a conserved 5'-AGAACA-3'-like hexanucleotides separated by a three-nucleotide spacer from a similar, but less conserved hexanucleotide. Here, we report the structures of the human AR DNA binding domain (DBD) bound to two natural AREs (C3 and MTV) in head-to-head dimer conformations, diffracting at 2.05 Å and 2.25 Å, respectively. These structures help to explain the impact of androgen insensitivity mutations on the structure integrity, DNA binding and DBD dimerization. The binding affinity of the AR DBD to different DNA motifs were measured by the BioLayer Interferometry (BLI) and further validated by Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. This shows that the high binding affinity of the first DBD to the upstream 5'-AGAACA-3' motif induces the cooperative binding of the second DBD to the second hexanucleotide. Our data indicate identical interaction of the DBDs to the upstream hexanucleotides, while forming an induced closer contact of the second DBD on the non-canonical hexanucleotides. The variation in binding between the DBD monomers are the result of differences in DNA occupancy, protein-protein interactions, DNA binding affinity, and DNA binding energy profiles. We propose this has functional consequences.

Androgen Receptor-Mediated Transcription in Prostate Cancer

Androgen receptor (AR)-mediated transcription is critical in almost all stages of prostate cancer (PCa) growth and differentiation. This process involves a complex interplay of coregulatory proteins, chromatin remodeling complexes, and other transcription factors that work with AR at cis-regulatory enhancer regions to induce the spatiotemporal transcription of target genes. This enhancer-driven mechanism is remarkably dynamic and undergoes significant alterations during PCa progression. In this review, we discuss the AR mechanism of action in PCa with a focus on how cis-regulatory elements modulate gene expression. We explore emerging evidence of genetic variants that can impact AR regulatory regions and alter gene transcription in PCa. Finally, we highlight several outstanding questions and discuss potential mechanisms of this critical transcription factor.

Identification of secretaglobin Scgb2a1 as a target for developmental reprogramming by BPA in the rat prostate

Secretoglobins are a superfamily of secreted proteins thought to participate in inflammation, tissue repair, and tumorigenesis. Secretoglobin family 2A member 1 (Scgb2a1) is a component of prostatein, a major androgen-binding protein secreted by the rat prostate. Using a rat model for developmental reprogramming of susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis, we identified, by RNA-seq, that Scgb2a1 is significantly upregulated (>100-fold) in the prostate of adult rats neonatally exposed to bisphenol A (BPA), with increased gene expression confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR and chromatin immunoprecipitation for histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation. Bisulfite analysis of both CpG islands located within 10 kb of the Scgb2a1 promoter identified significant hypomethylation of the CpG island upstream of the transcription start site of this gene in the reprogrammed prostate. These data suggest that expression of Scgb2a1 in the adult prostate could be epigenetically reprogrammed by BPA exposure during prostate development, with potential implications for cancer risk and response to chemotherapeutics associated with prostatein binding.

Genome-wide analysis of androgen receptor targets reveals COUP-TF1 as a novel player in human prostate cancer

Androgen activity plays a key role in prostate cancer progression. Androgen receptor (AR) is the main mediator of androgen activity in the prostate, through its ability to act as a transcription mediator. Here we performed a genome-wide analysis of human AR binding to promoters in the presence of an agonist or antagonist in an androgen dependent prostate cancer cell line. Many of the AR bound promoters are bound in all examined conditions while others are bound only in the presence of an agonist or antagonist. Several motifs are enriched in AR bound promoters, including the AR Response Element (ARE) half-site and recognition elements for the transcription factors OCT1 and SOX9. This suggests that these 3 factors could define a module of co-operating transcription factors in the prostate. Interestingly, AR bound promoters are preferentially located in AT rich genomic regions. Analysis of mRNA expression identified chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor 1 (COUP-TF1) as a direct AR target gene that is downregulated upon binding by the agonist liganded AR. COUP-TF1 immunostaining revealed nucleolar localization of COUP-TF1 in epithelium of human androgen dependent prostate cancer, but not in adjacent benign prostate epithelium. Stromal cells both in human and mouse prostate show nuclear COUP-TF1 staining. We further show that there is an inverse correlation between COUP-TF1 expression in prostate stromal cells and the rising levels of androgen with advancing puberty. This study extends the pool of recognized putative AR targets and identifies a negatively regulated target of AR – COUP-TF1 – which could possibly play a role in human prostate cancer.

Identification and characterization of androgen response elements

The androgen receptor (AR) has a DNA-binding domain that consists of two zinc coordinating modules. While residues of the first module make most of the sequence-specific contacts, the second module functions as a homodimerization interface (1). This explains why the androgen response elements (AREs) are organized as two 5'-AGAACA-3'-like motifs separated by three basepairs (2). AREs can be located near the promoters of androgen-responsive genes, but are also at considerable distances either upstream or downstream, so the initial steps in locating AREs can be challenging. Traditionally, AR-binding sites were identified by DNA cellulose competition assays (3) or by in vitro footprinting (4). However, the advent of the chromatin immunoprecipitation assays made it possible to identify genomic fragments to which the AR binds either directly or indirectly (5). To enable identification of AREs in such genomic fragments, we developed an in silico approach involving a weight matrix based on all known AREs (6). This will point out candidate AREs, which will still need experimental validation involving a direct interaction assay and a transactivation assay. We describe here the methods most fit to describe an ARE: the electrophoretic mobility shift and the transactivation assays.

Diverse roles of androgen receptor (AR) domains in AR-mediated signaling

Androgens control male sexual development and maintenance of the adult male phenotype. They have very divergent effects on their target organs like the reproductive organs, muscle, bone, brain and skin. This is explained in part by the fact that different cell types respond differently to androgen stimulus, even when all these responses are mediated by the same intracellular androgen receptor. To understand these tissue- and cell-specific readouts of androgens, we have to learn the many different steps in the transcription activation mechanisms of the androgen receptor (NR3C4). Like all nuclear receptors, the steroid receptors have a central DNA-binding domain connected to a ligand-binding domain by a hinge region. In addition, all steroid receptors have a relatively large amino-terminal domain. Despite the overall structural homology with other nuclear receptors, the androgen receptor has several specific characteristics which will be discussed here. This receptor can bind two types of androgen response elements (AREs): one type being similar to the classical GRE/PRE-type elements, the other type being the more divergent and more selective AREs. The hormone-binding domain has low intrinsic transactivation properties, a feature that correlates with the low affinity of this domain for the canonical LxxLL-bearing coactivators. For the androgen receptor, transcriptional activation involves the alternative recruitment of coactivators to different regions in the amino-terminal domain, as well as the hinge region. Finally, a very strong ligand-induced interaction between the amino-terminal domain and the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor seems to be involved in many aspects of its function as a transcription factor. This review describes the current knowledge on the structure-function relationships within the domains of the androgen receptor and tries to integrate the involvement of different domains, subdomains and motifs in the functioning of this receptor as a transcription factor with tissue- and cell-specific readouts.

Identification of androgen-selective androgen-response elements in the human aquaporin-5 and Rad9 genes

The AR (androgen receptor) is known to influence the expression of its target genes by binding to different sets of AREs (androgen-response elements) in the DNA. One set consists of the classical steroid-response elements which are partial palindromic repeats of the 5'-TGTTCT-3' steroid-receptor monomer-binding element. The second set contains motifs that are AR-specific and that are proposed to be partial direct repeats of the same motif. On the basis of this assumption, we used an in silico approach to identify new androgen-selective AREs in the regulatory regions of known androgen-responsive genes. We have used an extension of the NUBIScan algorithm to screen a collection of 85 known human androgen-responsive genes compiled from literature and database searches. We report the evaluation of the most promising hits resulting from this computational search by in vitro DNA-binding assays using full-size ARs and GRs (glucocorticoid receptors) as well as their isolated DBDs (DNA-binding domains). We also describe the ability of some of these motifs to confer androgen-, but not glucocorticoid-, responsiveness to reporter-gene expression. The elements found in the aquaporin-5 and the Rad9 (radiation-sensitive 9) genes showed selective AR versus GR binding in band-shift assays and a strong activity and selectivity in functional assays, both as isolated elements and in their original contexts. Our data indicate the validity of the hypothesis that selective AREs are recognizable as direct 5'-TGTTCT-3' repeats, and extend the list of currently known selective elements.

Quantitative determination of lobe specificity of mRNA expression of androgen-dependent genes in the rat prostate gland

The rodent prostate has a complex structure, consisting of a ventral prostate (VP), lateral prostate (LP), dorsal prostate (DP) and anterior prostate (AP), and most studies so far have focused on the VP. Androgen-responsive prostatic secretory proteins, such as prostatein and kallikreins, are mainly produced in the VP, but others are abundant in the LP and DP, though little is known about differences of androgen regulation among the different lobes. Here, the mRNA expression levels of some representative androgen-responsive genes, including those encoding prostatic secreted proteins, were quantitatively determined in each of the prostatic lobes of intact rats and castrated rats treated with testosterone alone or plus flutamide. The results show that the transcriptional regulation of prostatic secretory proteins differs greatly among lobes, generally being more tightly regulated in the VP. A number of growth factor mRNAs were differentially expressed in separate lobes and were regulated by testosterone in a lobe-specific manner. Lobe-specific regulation by androgen was also found for other genes, including the DAD-1 and calreticulin genes. Thus, hormone-dependent transcriptional regulation of prostate genes differs among lobes, and there is also interlobar diversity of basal mRNA expression levels.

Identification and characterization of a prostate-specific androgen-independent protein-binding site in the probasin promoter

In this study we investigated the combination of transcription factors and proteins binding to the proximal part of the prostate-specific probasin (PB) promoter. Using DNaseI in vitro footprinting, several protected regions were identified on the proximal PB promoter (nucleotides -286 to +28 relative to the transcription start site) when nuclear extracts from LNCaP, a human prostate cancer cell line, were used. Four of the protected areas were observed only when LNCaP nuclear extracts treated with synthetic androgen (10 nM R1881) were used. Two other regions, referred to as FPI and FPII, showed protection regardless of the presence or absence of androgen. When DNaseI footprinting was done using other prostate and non-prostate nuclear extracts, protection of the FPII region was only seen in prostate cell lines. These androgen-independent regions were further tested for tissue and binding specificity using the electrophoretic mobility-shift assay. Eight complexes formed with the FPI probe while four complexes were observed with the FPII probe on incubation with the tested nuclear extracts. Methylation protection assays reveal that prostate cancer cell lines yield slightly different protection patterns for some of the protein complexes formed with non-prostate-derived cell lines, suggesting the presence of prostate-enriched or -exclusive proteins. Site-directed mutagenesis of the protected nucleotides within FPII resulted in a significant reduction in expression from the PB promoter. Identification of proteins binding to the FPII region revealed the participation of nuclear factor I (NF-I) or a closely related protein, although other unknown proteins are also involved. Defining the DNA and protein components that dictate prostate-specific expression of the PB promoter in an androgen-independent manner would provide a strong basis for the design and development of a gene therapy for systemic treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Selective DNA binding by the androgen receptor as a mechanism for hormone-specific gene regulation

Steroid hormones control many physiological processes by activating specific receptors that act as transcription factors. In vivo, each of these receptors has a specific set of target genes, but in vitro the glucocorticoid, progesterone, mineralocorticoid and androgen receptors (class I receptors) all recognise response elements which are organised as inverted repeats of 5'-TGTTCT-3'-like sequences with a three nucleotide spacer. This poses the question how the in vivo specificity of the different steroid responses is mediated. To unravel the mechanisms involved, we have compared the structural features of the androgen-selective enhancers of the probasin, the secretory component and the sex-limited protein genes with those of non-selective enhancers in the mouse mammary tumour viral promoter and the C3(1) gene. The probasin promoter contains an androgen response element which is recognised with high affinity by the androgen receptor, but not by the other class I receptors. Swapping experiments between the DNA-binding domains of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptor revealed that it is not the first zinc finger, but rather the second zinc finger and part of the hinge region which contribute to this specificity. Three AR-specific aminoacids are involved in the probasin ARE recognition, but not in the C3(1) ARE binding by the AR. The location of these residues strongly suggests that an alternative dimerisation interface is involved in the probasin ARE binding. We could subsequently demonstrate that the AR binds direct repeats of 5'-TGTTCT-3'-like sequences in gel retardation assays as well as in transfection experiments. Moreover, the androgen-specific enhancers all contain direct repeats, and point mutations that change the nature of these elements into inverted repeats result in a change of specificity. It seems, therefore, that direct repeat elements can be the determinants of the AR-specificity. It will be exciting to learn how such DNA elements will affect the properties of the receptor dimer with respect to ligand binding, interactions between the aminoterminal domain and the ligand-binding domain, the recruitement of co-activators and cooperativity with other transcription factors.

The C3(1)/SV40 T-antigen transgenic mouse model of mammary cancer: ductal epithelial cell targeting with multistage progression to carcinoma

The 5' flanking region of the C3(1) component of the rat prostate steroid binding protein (PSBP) has been used to successfully target the expression of the SV40 large T-antigen (Tag) to the epithelium of both the mammary and prostate glands resulting in models of mammary and prostate cancers which histologically resemble the human diseases. Atypia of the mammary ductal epithelium develops at about 8 weeks of age, progressing to mammary intraepithelial neoplasia (resembling human ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS]) at about 12 weeks of age with the development of invasive carcinomas at about 16 weeks of age in 100% of female mice. The carcinomas share features to what has been classified in human breast cancer as infiltrating ductal carcinomas. All FVB/N female mice carrying the transgene develop mammary cancer with about a 15% incidence of lung metastases. Approximately 10% of older male mice develop anaplastic mammary carcinomas. Unlike many other transgenic models in which hormones and pregnancy are used to induce a mammary phenotype, C3(1)/Tag mice develop mammary tumors in the mammary epithelium of virgin animals without hormone supplementation or pregnancy. Although mammary tumor development appears hormone-responsive at early stages, invasive carcinomas are hormone-independent, which corresponds to the loss of estrogen receptor-alpha expression during tumor progression. Molecular and biologic factors related to mammary tumor progression can be studied in this model since lesions evolve over a predictable time course. Genomic alterations have been identified during tumor progression, including an amplification of the distal portion of chromosome 6 containing ki-ras and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in other chromosomal regions. We have demonstrated that stage specific alterations in the expression of genes which are critical regulators of the cell cycle and apoptosis are functionally important in vivo. C3(1)/Tag mice appear useful for testing particular therapies since growth of the mammary tumors can be reduced using chemopreventive agents, cytokines, and an anti-angiogenesis agent.

Androgen specificity of a response unit upstream of the human secretory component gene is mediated by differential receptor binding to an essential androgen response element

The expression of secretory component (SC), the epithelial receptor for poly-immunoglobulins, is regulated in a highly tissue-specific manner. In several tissues, e.g. lacrimal gland and prostate, SC synthesis is enhanced by androgens at the transcriptional level. In this study, we describe the presence of an androgen response unit, located 3.3 kb upstream of the sc transcription initiation site and containing several 5'-TGTTCT-3'-like motifs. Although each of these elements is implicated in the enhancer function, one element, the ARE1.2 motif, is found to be the main interaction site for the androgen receptor as demonstrated in in vitro binding assays as well as in transient transfection assays. A high-affinity binding site for nuclear factor I, adjacent to this ARE, is also involved in the correct functioning of the sc upstream enhancer. The ARE1.2 motif consists of an imperfect direct repeat of two core binding elements with a three-nucleotide spacer and therefore constitutes a nonconventional ARE. We demonstrate that this element displays selectivity for the androgen receptor as opposed to glucocorticoid receptor both in in vitro binding assays and in transfection experiments. Mutational analysis suggests that the direct nature of the half-site repeat is responsible for this selectivity. We have thus determined a complex and androgen-specific response unit in the far upstream region of the human SC gene, which we believe to be involved in its androgen responsiveness in epithelial cells of different organs such as prostate and lacrimal gland. We were also able to demonstrate that the primary sequence of a single nonconventional ARE motif within the enhancer is responsible for its androgen specificity.

Relative activity and specificity of promoters from prostate-expressed genes

BACKGROUND

To evaluate their relative activity and specificity for prostate cells promoter and regulatory regions from three prostate-expressed genes-prostate-specific antigen (PSA), probasin, and relaxin H2-have been compared in prostate cell lines and in lines of breast, bladder, liver, kidney, lung, and ovarian origin.

METHODS

After transfection into different cell types, the activity of promoters was assayed using linked reporter genes and normalized against that of the Rous sarcoma virus. Activity was measured both in the presence and in the absence of co-transfected androgen receptor (AR).

RESULTS

PSA and probasin regulatory regions showed strong responsiveness to co-transfection of the AR in most cell types. The core PSA promoter region showed low activity and specificity, but the specificity and level of expression were substantially increased by inclusion of upstream sequences, particularly the enhancer region. Probasin promoter fragments showed specificity of expression for prostate cell lines but required AR for significant levels of expression. Relaxin promoter fragments directed significant AR-inducible expression in prostate cells but showed little specificity and variable AR responsiveness in other cell types.

CONCLUSIONS

Of regulatory regions tested, a 430-base pair probasin promoter and PSA enhancer/core promoter showed the best combination of AR-stimulated prostate cell expression with limited expression in other cell types.

Regulatory capacity of an androgen-specific enhancer of the mouse Slp gene in transgenic mice

Different steroid hormone receptors can activate transcription from the same hormone response element (HRE) in vitro, but in vivo the effects of each hormone on gene activity are distinct. To determine sequences mediating androgen-specific response in a physiological setting, we placed the androgen-responsive mouse sex-limited protein gene (Slp) enhancer before a tkCAT reporter in transgenic mice. The enhancer contains a consensus HRE plus accessory factor binding sites that act in concert to direct transcription in response to androgen. A 160 bp fragment, C'delta2, is responsive to several steroids in transfection; in transgenic mice, this enhancer was active in several tissues of male and female mice, in four of six transgenic lines. In striking contrast, C'delta9, a 120 bp sub-fragment of C'delta2 that responds only to androgen in transfection, showed activity in testes, prostate and kidney, where it was strongly androgen-inducible in females. However, expression was obtained in only one transgenic line. Multimerization of the C'delta9 enhancer conferred expression in prostate, but again in only one line. The greater penetrance of C'delta2 expression was not driven by glucocorticoids, as adrenalectomy had little effect, but may be dependent on the NF-kappaB-like element absent from the C'delta9 fragment. That two transgenic lines showed expression in androgen target sites driven by enhancers that are androgen-specific in vitro suggested that activation of this enhancer, when it could occur, was in response to androgen. The dramatically different behavior of the two related enhancer sequences underscores the importance of chromosomal context to the activity and specificity of regulatory elements.

Characterization of an androgen response element within the promoter of the epididymis-specific murine glutathione peroxidase 5 gene

We have shown in earlier studies, using a mouse model, that the expression of the glutathione peroxidase 5 protein (GPX5) is restricted to the epididymis and that the accumulation of its corresponding mRNA is hormonally, spatially and temporally regulated throughout postnatal development. We report here, using run-on assays, transient expression experiments as well as gel-shift and footprinting analyses on the findings that at least part of the androgenic control of the GPX5 expression is exerted at the transcriptional level via an androgen response element localized in the distal promoter region of the GPX5 gene. The gpx5 androgen response element (ARE) is found to be consistent with the consensus palindromic steroid-receptor target sequence 5'-AGWACWnnnTGTYCT-3' but exhibits a quite weak conservation in the left half site. The data presented here further expand the diversity of sequence able to confer androgen responsiveness.

The androgen-dependent mouse seminal vesicle secretory protein of 99 amino acids (MSVSP99): regulation of the mRNA and preliminary characterization of the promoter

MSVSP99 (mouse seminal vesicle secretory protein of 99 amino acids) is a member of the rat and mouse seminal vesicle secretory protein (SVS) family. In order to characterize its androgenic regulation, the cloned cDNA and gene encoding MSVSP99 have been used. At adulthood, the MSVSP99 mRNA represents from 3 to 7% of the total mRNA population. This mRNA accumulation is under androgenic control because it is abolished by castration and restored in castrated mice by heptylate testosterone injection. During ontogenesis, MSVSP99 mRNA is just detectable in 10-day-old mice, and reaches adult levels at 30 days. Neonatal castration abolishes MSVSP99 mRNA accumulation in 20-day-old mice. Transcription elongation assays show that androgens act mainly on the MSVSP99 gene transcription. In an attempt to obtain information about the mechanism of androgen action on transcription, preliminary transient transfection experiments in CV-1 cells permitted us to define a promoter region (-387/ + 16), the activity of which is enhanced by dihydrotestosterone.

Identification and characterization of a novel androgen response element composed of a direct repeat

Transcriptional regulation by the androgen receptor (AR) requires its binding to hormone response element nucleotide sequences in DNA. A consensus glucocorticoid response element (GRE) can mediate transactivation by AR and other members of the AR/glucocorticoid (GR)/progesterone (PR)/mineralocorticoid (MR) receptor subfamily. We identified putative androgen response element (ARE) sequences by binding of a human AR DNA-binding domain fusion protein to DNA in a random sequence selection assay. A 17-base pair consensus nucleotide sequence, termed IDR17, containing three potential GRE-like core binding sites organized as both inverted and direct repeats, was determined from a pool of degenerate oligonucleotides. IDR17 was active in mediating androgen-dependent induction of reporter gene expression in transient transfection assays. Dissection of the IDR17 sequence revealed an 11-base pair sequence (DR-1), consisting of two potential core binding sites oriented as an overlapping direct repeat, as the most potent ARE. DR-1 demonstrated a strong preference for AR binding and transactivation when compared with GR. To our knowledge, this is the first observation that a direct repeat of GRE-like core motifs functions as a preferred hormone response element within the AR/GR/PR/MR subfamily of nuclear receptors.

The androgen-specific probasin response element 2 interacts differentially with androgen and glucocorticoid receptors

The nuclear receptors constitute a large family of transcription factors characterized by a well conserved DNA-binding domain. The receptors for glucocorticoids, progestins, mineralocorticoids, and androgens constitute a subgroup because they bind in vitro with high affinity to DNA elements containing a partial palindrome of the core sequence 5'-TGTTCT-3'. In vivo, however, the corresponding steroids differentially regulate the expression of their target genes, even when more than one receptor type is present in a particular cell. The DNA-binding domains of the androgen and of the glucocorticoid receptors bind most androgen response elements with similar relative affinities. In contrast, one element (5'-GGTTCTTGGAGTACT-3') which was recently described in the promoter region of the probasin gene selectively interacts with the DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor and not with that of the glucocorticoid receptor. From studies with chimeric elements, it can be deduced that it is the left subsequence 5'-GGTTCT-3' which excludes the glucocorticoid receptor domain from binding. In co-transfection experiments where the ARE of the C3(1) gene is responsive to both androgens and glucocorticoids, the probasin element is induced only by androgens and not by glucocorticoids. The existence of response elements which are recognized preferentially by the androgen receptor provides yet another possible mechanism to explain the differences of the in vivo effects between androgens and other steroids of the subgroup.

Specificity of simple hormone response elements in androgen regulated genes

Androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors recognize a family of 15 base pair partial palindromic hormone response elements (HRE). We have studied receptor interactions with several HREs from androgen regulated genes to determine their potential to mediate a selective androgen response. Synthetic oligonucleotides corresponding to the elements were analysed for receptor binding and steroid dependent transcriptional enhancer activities. Each HRE contained the 3' half-site sequence (5'-TGTNCT-3') of the glucocorticoid response element (GRE) consensus sequence. HREs that countained the 5' half-site GRE consensus sequence (5'-A/GGNACA/G-3') had the strongest and-rogen response element (ARE) and GRE activities. In methylation interference assays, AR and GR interacted with identical base contact sites in the response elements. Two elements that deviated from the GRE consensus sequence by a single optimal base in the 5' half, had reduced ARE activity with no significant change in GRE activity and displayed lower binding of AR than GR in mobility shift assays using purified DNA binding domain peptides. Transfections with AR/GR and GR/AR chimeras containing the N-terminal domain of one receptor linked to the DNA-binding and C-terminal domains of the other suggested that N-terminal domain functions of GR also contributed to the greater GRE than ARE activities of the response elements.

Iron deprivation results in an increase in p53 expression

Deferoxamine (DFO)-induced iron deprivation caused an increase in p53 expression in ML-1 and Raji cells. In ML-1 cells, with express wild type p53, p53 protein levels were transiently increased 6 h after addition of 10(-4)M DFO. In Raji cells, which carry a mutant p53 allele, p53 increased 6 h after addition of 10(-4)M DFO and remained elevated for 24 h. Growth inhibition was observed in both cell types 6 h after addition of 10(-4)M DFO. In both cells, p53 mRNA levels did not increase following incubation with DFO, suggesting that increased p53 expression is the result of a post-transcriptional mechanism. Although increases in wild type p53 protein in ML-1 cells resulted in increases in a p53 target gene, p21cipl/wafl/sdil, this effect was not observed in Raji cells which express a mutant p53 protein.

Quantitative differences in androgen and glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding properties contribute to receptor-selective transcriptional regulation

Androgen receptor (AR) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) belong to the same subfamily of steroid/nuclear receptors and have been shown to bind qualitatively to the same hormone response element (HRE) DNA sequences. Despite this similarity in target gene recognition, AR and GR have differential affects on the transcriptional regulation of genes containing both simple and complex HRE control regions. Using HREs from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV), tyrosine aminotransferase (TAT), prostatein (C3) or sex-limited protein (SLP) genes, linked to the thymidine kinase promoter, we found receptor-selective differences in the ability of rat AR and rat GR to induce transcription of these various reporter genes. Since AR and GR have a 20% amino acid sequence difference in their DNA binding domains (DBDs), which could result in altered DNA binding affinities, we measured the ability of purified AR and GR DBDs to bind selectively and with high affinity to these HRE sequences in vitro. Gel shift mobility assays showed that the GR DBD had a higher affinity for a consensus HRE than did the AR DBD, and quantitative DNase I footprinting revealed that AR and GR DBDs bound to the MMTV, TAT, C3 and SLP HREs with different affinities. It was found that AR had a dissociation constant (Kd) that was 2-3 times higher than GR on the TAT, C3 and SLP HREs and that the Kd of AR for the C3 and SLP HREs differed by an order of magnitude (43 nM and 460 nM, respectively). Taken together, these data suggest that amino acid differences in the AR and GR DBDs contribute to altered receptor-DNA interactions, however it is likely that non-receptor factors are involved in further modulating receptor-selective DNA binding and transactivation functions.

Androgens regulate expression of the gene coding for a mouse vas deferens protein related to the aldo-keto reductase superfamily in epithelial cell subcultures

Mouse vas deferens protein (MVDP), a member of the aldo-keto reductase superfamily, is exclusively produced in the vas deferens. To better understand androgen-regulated MVDP gene expression we have used RNA hybridization to study the effects of androgens on the steady-state levels of MVDP mRNA in vas deferens epithelial cell subcultures. Northern blot analysis revealed that these cells only express MVDP mRNA in the presence of androgens. There was a close relationship between MVDP mRNA levels and dihydrotestosterone concentrations. MVDP mRNA is induced over a period of 24h and maximal induction is about 25-fold. Treatment of cells with cycloheximide completely abolished the observed androgen effect suggesting that the induction of the MVDP gene by androgens depends on continuous protein synthesis. Transient transfection of vas deferens epithelial cells with MMTV-CAT vector showed that these cells contained functional androgen receptors and that they are a suitable system to study androgen effect on MVDP gene regulatory elements.

Molecular mechanisms of androgen action

Androgens directly regulate a vast number of physiological events. These direct androgen effects are mediated by a nuclear receptor that exhibits four major functions or activities: steroid binding, DNA binding, transactivation, and nuclear localization. The SBD consists of a hydrophobic pocket of amino acids that exhibits high-affinity, androgen-specific binding. Based on studies of mutant AR, it appears that a number of different amino acids contribute to the steroid binding characteristics of the AR. The DNA binding domain confers sequence-specific binding to structures called androgen-responsive elements. The specificity of steroid binding and DNA binding provides a crucial basis for androgen-specific regulation of target genes. The nuclear localization signal shares homology with known nuclear localization signals and, coupled with the presence of androgens, is responsible for localizing the AR to the nucleus. The transactivation functions reside mostly in the NH2 terminus but the responsible domains are as yet poorly defined. Though the different domains can act as independent moieties, one domain can clearly alter the behavior of another domain. For instance, the SBD appears to inhibit the transactivating functions until steroid is bound and the amino terminus prevents DNA binding activity until steroid is bound. The relative ease of introducing mutations with polymerase chain reaction technology will facilitate further delineation of critical amino acids and domains responsible for the various activities of the AR. The recent cloning and characterization of AR promoters revealed that the AR genes are driven by a TATA-less promoter characteristics of housekeeping genes. Analysis of transcription rates, mRNA levels, and protein levels indicates that androgens and pkA and pkC pathways modulate expression of AR mRNA and protein. This indicates that the same signal pathways that interact to regulate androgen target genes also regulate the levels of AR in the target tissues. Surprisingly few androgen-regulated genes have been well characterized for the mechanisms by which androgen regulates the gene. The C(3), Slp, probasin, PSA, and hKLK2 genes have provided examples where androgens regulate transcription. Posttranscriptional regulation by androgens has been demonstrated for the SVP1, 2, 3, and 4 and AR genes. The mechanisms underlying posttranscriptional regulation are poorly defined but substantial progress has been made in defining the critical elements that mediate transcriptional effects of androgens. Transcriptional effects are mediated through binding of androgen-AR complexes to specific DNA sequences called AREs. Simple AREs such as those found in C(3) and kallikrein genes tend to be permissive in that GR and PR can also act through the same element.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Proteins interacting with an androgen-responsive unit in the C3(1) gene intron

The expression of the three genes encoding the components C1, C2 and C3 of prostatic binding protein (PBP) is under androgen control and restricted to the rat ventral prostate. The SstI-PvuII fragment of the first intron of the C3(1) gene displays two binding sites for ubiquitous transcription factors and one for a tissue-specific factor in a 80-bp region upstream of its androgen response element (ARE). The octamer transcription factor 1 (OTF-1) binds to the most distal element (site 1) while a member of the nuclear factor I (NF-I) family recognizes site 2. A third unidentified prostate-specific factor, which also occurs in castrated rats, interacts with the proximal element (site 3). In T-47D cells, both the OTF-1 and the NF-I-like factor can modulate the androgen response of the promoter in a reporter gene construct containing the C3(1) intronic fragment.

Transcriptional regulation of dog prostate arginine esterase gene by androgens

These studies were designed to define the molecular events involved in the modulation of dog prostate arginine esterase gene expression following short castration intervals and androgen treatment. Arginine esterase enzymatic activity and protein levels decreased about 50% 24 h after castration. Thereafter, a more progressive decrease was observed, resulting in 2-4-fold lower levels in 12-day castrates than in the intact controls. Total prostatic arginine esterase mRNA levels slowly decreased during the first five days after castration but more abruptly thereafter and were about 150-fold lower in 12-day castrated animals. By contrast, in isolated prostatic nuclei, levels of arginine esterase RNA precursors and mature transcripts rapidly fell following orchiectomy, with a 50-70% decrease 24 h after castration. Nuclear run-on experiments confirmed that the latter effects were the result of decreased arginine esterase gene transcription. All these changes could be at least partially reversed by administration of testosterone cypionate. Furthermore, no striking modifications in the proportion of epithelial/stromal cells in the prostatic tissue were observed following orchiectomy. These results show that castration and androgens exert very rapid effects on the gene expression of arginine esterase, and that the regulation occurs at the transcriptional level.

Transcriptional regulation of androgen receptor gene expression in Sertoli cells and other cell types

Regulation of androgen receptor (AR) mRNA expression was studied in Sertoli cells and peritubular myoid cells isolated from immature rat testis, and in the lymph node carcinoma cell line derived from a human prostate (LNCaP). Addition of dibutyryl-cyclic AMP (dbcAMP) to Sertoli cell cultures resulted in a rapid transient decrease in AR mRNA expression (5 h), which was followed by a gradual increase in AR mRNA expression (24-72 h). This effect of dbcAMP mimicked follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) action. In peritubular myoid cells, there was only a moderate but prolonged decrease during incubation in the presence of dbcAMP, and in LNCaP cells no effect of dbcAMP on AR mRNA expression was observed. When Sertoli cells or peritubular myoid cells were cultured in the presence of androgens, AR mRNA expression in these cell types did not change. This is in contrast to LNCaP cells, that showed a marked reduction of AR mRNA expression during androgen treatment. In the present experiments, transcriptional regulation of AR gene expression in Sertoli cells and LNCaP cells was also examined. Freshly isolated Sertoli cell clusters were transfected with a series of luciferase reporter gene constructs, driven by the AR promoter. It was found that addition of dbcAMP to the transfected Sertoli cells resulted in a small but consistent increase in reporter gene expression (which was interpreted as resulting from AR promoter activity); a construct that only contained the AR 5' untranslated region of the cDNA sequence did not show such a regulation. The same constructs, transfected into LNCaP cells, did not show any transcriptional down-regulation when the synthetic androgen R1881 was added to the cell cultures. A nuclear transcription elongation experiment (run-on), however, demonstrated that androgen-induced AR mRNA down-regulation in LNCaP cells resulted from an inhibition of AR gene transcription. The present results indicate that in Sertoli cells and LNCaP cells, hormonal effects on AR gene transcription play a role in regulation of AR expression. However, AR gene transcription in these cells is differentially regulated.

The genomic organization and DNA sequence of the mouse vas deferens androgen-regulated protein gene

The gene for mouse vas deferens protein (MVDP) is expressed, under androgenic control, exclusively in the epithelial cells of the deferent duct. As a first step in correlating cell-specific and hormonal regulations with the structure of the gene, the complete sequence of the MVDP gene (11 kb) and 0.5 kb of the 5' flanking region have been determined. The size range for the 10 exons is 78 to 168 bp, whereas that of introns is 292 to 2833 bp. A major site of transcription is located on an A residue 46 nucleotides upstream from the A of the ATG initiation codon. A TATA (CATAA) box, a CAAT box, a GC-rich motif and a (5'-TGTTCT-3') element that closely resembles the consensus sequence of the androgen response elements are present in the 5' flanking region of the MVDP gene.

Demonstration of DNA binding factors interacting with a fragment of the canine prostate arginine esterase gene promoter

We have studied, by the gel mobility shift assay, the interaction of DNA binding proteins with a fragment of the proximal promoter (from nucleotides -177 to -47) of the androgen-regulated canine prostate arginine esterase gene. Several shifted bands were obtained using nuclear extracts from various tissues. In the case of the prostate, the intensity of some of the shifted bands was decreased or increased when the extracts were prepared from animals that had been castrated 12 days earlier. Several of the DNA-protein complexes could be assigned to an interaction with part or all of the sequence GGGGGTGGGGG from-124 to -114. We also obtained evidence for the presence of protein(s) interacting with an Sp1 motif present in the same fragment. These results suggest that some ubiquitous factors different from the androgen receptors could be involved in the regulation of the arginine esterase gene.

The role of cell-cell interactions in androgen action

Androgen-regulated mesenchymal-epithelial interactions play an important role during embryonic development of the male urogenital tractus. Studies on the effects of androgens on cultured testicular cells derived from the immature rat testis indicate that, even during postnatal life, similar interactions may be instrumental for normal androgen action. Androgen receptors are found in epithelial Sertoli cells as well as in mesenchymal peritubular cells. The effects of androgens on isolated Sertoli cells, however, are limited. Coculture with peritubular cells increases the sensitivity and/or the responsiveness of a number of Sertoli cell parameters (transferrin, ABP, aromatase activity) to androgens. This effect is at least in part mediated by the secretion of one or more diffusible factors (P-Mod-S) by the peritubular cells. We investigated whether such indirect effects of androgens, relying on mesenchymal-epithelial interactions are also observed in other androgen target tissues. To this end stromal cells were isolated and cultured from the immature rat ventral prostate and the production of factors with P-Mod-S activity was monitored using Sertoli cells as the test system. Under coculture conditions these stromal cells stimulate Sertoli cell transferrin secretion in an androgen-regulated fashion, exactly as peritubular cells. This stimulatory effect is related in part to the collaborative (and androgen-independent) deposition of an extracellular matrix and in part to the secretion of an androgen-regulated diffusible mediator. This mediator has the same physicochemical characteristics as P-Mod-S and it affects other Sertoli cell parameters (ABP, aromatase activity, inhibin, cGMP) in the same way as P-Mod-S. Cultured stromal and peritubular cells look very similar and stain positive after immunostaining for alpha-smooth muscle isoactin. Tissue sections suggest that these cells may be derived from myoid peritubular cells in the testis and similar periacinar cells in the prostate. The hypothesis is advanced that P-Mod-S may be a more universal mediator of indirect effects of androgens in diverse target tissues and that this factor is derived from myoid cells closely associated with the epithelial component.

Effects of androgens on the transcription of secretory protein genes in rat seminal vesicle

Run-on transcription in isolated nuclei has been used to study the effects of testosterone on gene expression in rat seminal vesicles. General transcriptional rates were increased by about 6-fold with an additional 2- to 3-fold differential stimulation of the genes for secretory proteins IV and V. These transcriptional changes are insufficient to explain overall changes in cellular mRNA levels, indicating that androgens must also have major effects on post-transcriptional processing of RNA transcripts or on mRNA stability. Analysis of nuclear RNA by Northern blotting with intron probes suggests substantial androgen effects on primary transcript processing.