Potential for cytokine therapy of malignant mesothelioma

Current State of Pleural-Directed Adjuncts Against Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Multimodality therapy including surgical resection is the current paradigm in treating malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a thoracic surface cancer without cure. The main limitation of all surgical approaches is the lack of long-term durability because macroscopic complete resection (R1 resection) commonly predisposes to locoregional relapse. Over the years, there have been many studies that describe various intrapleural strategies that aim to extend the effect of surgical resection. The majority of these approaches are intraoperative adjuvants. Broadly, there are three therapeutic classes that employ diverse agents. The most common, widely used group of adjuvants are comprised of direct therapeutics such as intracavitary chemotherapy (± hyperthermia). By comparison, the least commonly employed intrathoracic adjuvant is the class comprised of drug-device combinations like photodynamic therapy (PDT). But the most rapidly evolving (new) class with much potential for improved efficacy are therapeutics delivered by specialized drug vehicles such as a fibrin gel containing cisplatin. This review provides an updated perspective on pleural-directed adjuncts in the management of MPM as well as highlighting the most promising near-term technology breakthroughs.

How Our Continuing Studies of the Pre-clinical Inbred Mouse Models of Mesothelioma Have Influenced the Development of New Therapies

Asbestos-induced preclinical mouse models of mesothelioma produce tumors that are very similar to those that develop in humans and thus represent an ideal platform to study this rare, universally fatal tumor type. Our team and a number of other research groups have established such models as a stepping stone to new treatments, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other approaches that have been/are being translated into clinical trials. In some cases this work has led to changes in mesothelioma treatment practice and over the last 30 years these models and studies have led to trials which have improved the response rate in mesothelioma from less than 10% to over 50%. Mouse models have had a vital role in that improvement and will continue to play a key role in the future success of mesothelioma immunotherapy. In this review we focus only on these original inbred mouse models, the large number of preclinical studies conducted using them and their contribution to current and future clinical therapy for mesothelioma.

Peritoneal mesothelioma: an unusual cause of an acute phase response presenting to the rheumatologist

The presence of an acute phase response may pre-date the eventual diagnosis of malignant disease by months or even years. We describe two patients referred to the rheumatology clinic, in which extensive investigation failed to identify an underlying cause to account for the presenting symptoms and an associated acute phase response. Several months later, repeated abdominal CT scans revealed an abnormality and subsequent laparoscopic biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of peritoneal mesothelioma.

Gene therapy of mesothelioma

Despite improved diagnostic skills and new chemotherapeutic regimens, malignant mesothelioma (MM) remains a pathological disease with survival expectations after diagnosis remaining < 1 year. As the incidence of this disease has yet to peak, there is a pressing need for new therapeutic approaches. One such approach is gene therapy, which inserts 'therapeutic' genes into (generally) tumour cells seeking to induce tumour regression via a number of different theoretical mechanisms. This approach may be particularly relevent for mesothelioma as it is localised to body cavities and is readily accessible for biopsy sampling or for gene delivery. Furthermore, as MM patients rarely die from distant metastases, treating the primary tumour site may result in significant symptomatic and survival benefit. Herein, the paper discusses past, present and future views on gene therapy in the treatment of MM.

Malignant mesothelioma: options for management

In the past, there has been a tendency to think of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma as one disease in therapeutic terms, regardless of histological type and tumor stage. This does not happen with other tumors, yet it is equally illogical and inappropriate in mesothelioma. As with other tumors, early diagnosis-while the disease is still in stage I, or even at an in situ stage-must be the goal so that therapy can be maximized, particularly if immunotherapy or gene therapy is to be used. Patients with pure epithelial mesothelioma have a better prognosis and respond better to trimodality therapy. Stage I patients who meet fitness criteria should be offered the option of radical surgery in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Further research is required to determine the optimum neoadjuvant and adjuvant modalities, particularly the timing of individual drugs, use of hyperthermia, and route of administration. The place of immunotherapy and gene therapy as adjunctive treatments also remains to be defined. For example, it may be possible to reduce tumor bulk and perhaps downstage the disease with immunotherapy before radical surgery, if treatment is started early enough. Gene therapy may have a role either preoperatively or in destroying the microscopic disease that remains after radical surgery. These and other combinations of treatment need to be tested in well-designed clinical trials, probably on a multicenter basis (to enroll a sufficient number of patients). Finding the means to improve treatment for sarcomatous and mixed histology mesothelioma remains a challenge. At present, radical surgery does not seem worthwhile for these patients when combined with currently employed chemotherapy and radiotherapy; however, chemotherapy combinations used for treating other sarcomas need to be evaluated as adjunctive therapy before radical surgery is abandoned altogether as a mode of treatment. A collaborative approach involving thoracic surgeons, basic scientists and oncologists, and physicians with experience in treating mesothelioma is essential. Despite its increasing frequency, mesothelioma is still a relatively rare tumor, so treatment should be concentrated in relatively few supraregional centers to maximize expertise and allow innovative treatment combinations to be implemented with the greatest chance of success. Evaluation of new therapeutic approaches will be achieved more rapidly if these supraregional centers collaborate in multicenter trials. The nihilistic approach of simply waiting until the mesothelioma epidemic eventually begins to decline spontaneously in 20 or 30 years is untenable in view of the hundreds of thousands of deaths that will result if no effective treatment is found.

Combination raltitrexed (Tomudex(R))-oxaliplatin: a step forward in the struggle against mesothelioma? The Institut Gustave Roussy experience with chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy in mesothelioma

The aim of this study was to review the experience of the Institut Gustave Roussy in 163 patients with malignant mesothelioma over a 9-year period. Data from seven consecutive prospective trials, four of chemo-immunotherapy and three of chemotherapy were reviewed. The rationale, methods and results of these trials are summarised and discussed. 98 patients were included in four phase II trials of chemo-immunotherapy whose common denominator was a combination of cisplatin and alpha-interferon. The response rate ranged from 15% to 40%. High-dose weekly cisplatin combined with alpha-interferon yielded the highest response rate but the toxicity of this regimen was considered unacceptable. Neither higher doses of alpha-interferon or the addition of mitomycin C or interleukin-2 to the regimen were able to enhance the activity of this combination. 18 patients were included in a paclitaxel-cisplatin phase II trial. The response rate was only 6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-24) and toxicity was also significant. This regimen was, therefore, considered ineffective. Of 17 patients with mesothelioma included in a phase I trial that combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin, 6 (35%) obtained a partial response. Responses were seen even in cisplatin-refractory mesothelioma. Preliminary results of a subsequent ongoing phase II trial using raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) have confirmed this promising activity with a 30% (9/30) response rate (95% CI: 15-49). The tolerance of this outpatient regimen is acceptable (no significant haematological toxicity and no alopecia) and compares favourably with that of our previous regimens. The final results concerning response and survival are required to confirm the efficacy of this combination. The preliminary results of two studies suggest promising activity with the combination of raltitrexed-oxaliplatin in malignant mesothelioma. The efficacy/toxicity ratio of this combination compares favourably with that of our previous chemotherapy and chemo-immunotherapy regimens.

Intrapleural administration of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) in patients with mesothelioma: cytokine patterns and acute-phase protein response

BACKGROUND

Tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) has been found to be very effective in the isolated limb perfusion setting for advanced extremity tumours. In a phase I study of intrapleural administration of TNFalpha 5 patients were followed for inflammatory response patterns.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Malignant mesothelioma patients were treated with repeated intrapleural administration of 0. 1-0.2 mg recombinant TNFalpha. Samples of serum and pleural fluid were taken at different time-points before and after TNFalpha-administration. Levels of TNFalpha, interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), C-reactive protein (CRP) and secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (alpha1-AG) was measured by nephelometry.

RESULTS

In pleural fluid TNFalpha and IL-8 reached peak levels, up to 50-700 ng mL-1 and 6-60 ng mL-1, respectively, 24 h after administration of TNFalpha. IL-6 (peak levels up to 250 ng mL-1) and sPLA2 peaked after 48 h. A slower and less dramatic pattern was observed for the levels of CRP and alpha1-AG. In serum no detectable levels of TNFalpha and no IL-8 were observed, whereas serum levels of IL-6, sPLA2 and CRP showed a clear increase after intrapleural administration of TNFalpha. Cytokines and acute-phase proteins showed the same pattern during subsequent cycles even up to 12 cycles. Tumour regression was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of a phase I study of repetitive intrapleural administration of TNFalpha in mesothelioma patients, we studied the characteristics of the inflammatory response. Intrapleural administration was followed by a clear inflammatory response locoregionally. In spite of TNFalpha peak levels as high as 700 ng mL-1 systemic levels were never detectable. The secondary cytokine response led to very high intrapleural IL-6 and IL-8 levels. Systemically IL-8 levels were never detectable whereas high IL-6 levels were induced systemically initially, with a decreased response to each intrapleural TNFalpha administration over time. The acute-phase response in contrast remained remarkably constant throughout the course of repeated intrapleural administrations of TNFalpha. Intrapleural administration of TNFalpha is well tolerated but associated with inconsistent and rather moderate impact on production of pleural fluid. This can be achieved by other simpler and cheaper treatment, thus we see no justification for further studies.

A review of chemotherapy trials for malignant mesothelioma

Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma continues to be frustrating regardless of the modality employed. Numerous trials of chemotherapeutic agents have been performed, but until recently, these studies were small and subject to inaccuracies of disease measurement. To our knowledge, no chemotherapeutic regimen has emerged as a standard of care. A review of the literature reveals that small activity against this disease has been shown by the anthracyclines, platinum compounds, and alkylating agents, whereas higher activity has been reported with the antimetabolites. The plant alkaloids have not demonstrated any activity against mesothelioma. Dose-escalated chemotherapeutic regimens may offer an advantage, whereas combination chemotherapy has not shown any benefit over single-agent therapy. Favorable responses have been reported with the administration of intrapleural biological response modifiers. Further trials and the investigation of new agents in the treatment of this disease are necessary.