Standardization of therapy machine interface for treatment monitoring

Reducing patient posture variability using the predicted couch position

A method is presented in which the couch position is predicted before the treatment instead of obtaining a reference position at the first treatment fraction. This prevents systematic differences in patient posture between preparation and treatment. In literature, only limited data are available on couch positioning. We position our patients at the planned couch position, allowing a small difference between skin marks and lasers, followed by online imaging. For a 3-month period, our standard deviations (mm) in couch position in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions were head and neck-1.6, 2.8, and 2.5; thorax-2.9, 5.5, and 4.5; breast-3.0, 4.1, and 4.0; and pelvis-3.5, 4.0, and 4.7, respectively. We have improved the reproducibility of patient posture in our institute by using the predicted couch position. Our data may serve as a reference for other institutes because the couch position variation is less than that published in literature.

Evaluation of frequency and type of errors detected by a computerized record and verify system during radiation treatment

BACKGROUND

Computerized record and verify systems (RVS) have been introduced to improve the precision of radiation treatment delivery. These systems prevent the delivery of ionizing radiations when the settings of the treatment machine do not match the intended parameters within some maximal authorized deviation.

PURPOSE

To assess the potential alteration of the frequency of errors associated with the use of RVS during radiation treatment delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The software of the RVS was altered in order to record the settings actually used for radiation treatment delivery whereas the verification function was suppressed. At the end of the study period, the settings used during daily administration of radiation treatment were compared to the parameters recorded in the RVS using the computer. They were also compared with the planned ones written in the patient treatment chart.

RESULTS

Out of the 147,476 parameters examined during the study period, 678 (0.46%) were set erroneously. At least one error occurred in 628 (3.22%) of the 19,512 treated fields. An erroneous parameter was introduced in the RVS memory in 22 (1.17%) of the 1885 fields.

CONCLUSIONS

RVS has the potential to improve precision of radiation treatment delivery by detecting a significant number of setting errors. However, excessive confidence in RVS could lead to repeated errors as there is a potential for the entry of erroneous parameters into the RVS memory.

Integration of radiotherapy planning systems and radiotherapy treatment equipment: 11 years experience

PURPOSE

We have investigated the requirements, design, implementation, and operation of a computer-controlled medical accelerator with multileaf collimator (MLC), integrated with a radiation treatment-planning system (RTPS), and we report on the performance, benefits, and lessons learned from this experience.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 1984 the University of Washington installed a computer-controlled radiation therapy machine (the Clinical Neutron Therapy System, or CNTS) with a multileaf collimator. Since the beginning of operation the control system computer has been connected by commercially available network hardware and software to three generations of radiation treatment-planning systems. Semiautomated setup and completely computerized check and confirm were incorporated into the system from the beginning of clinical operation in 1984. The system cannot deliver a patient treatment without a computer-prepared treatment plan.

RESULTS

The CNTS has been in use for routine patient treatments for over 11 years. The cost of the network connection and software was an insignificant fraction of the facility cost. Operation has been efficient and reliable. Of the 441 machine-related session reschedulings (out of 18,432 sessions total) during the past 9 years, only 20 were due to problems with data transfer between the RTPS and CNTS, associated primarily with two incidents. Close integration with the treatment-planning system allows complex treatments to be delivered. Dramatic evolution of the departmental treatment-planning system has not required any changes or redesign of either the accelerator control system or the network connection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience shows that a large degree of automation is possible with reasonable effort, by using well-known software and hardware design strategies. The lessons we have learned from this can be carried over into photon therapy now that photon accelerators with MLC facilities are commercially available.

Future health care technology and the hospital

The past decades have been a time of rapid technological change in health care, but technological change will probably accelerate during the next decade or so. This will bring problems, but it will also present certain opportunities. In particular, the health care system is faced with the need to spend its limited resources more effectively. The number of hospital beds is being reduced, and lengths of stay are falling. In the future, the health care system will have to care for an increasing number of elderly people, both with chronic disease and also with dependency because of frailty and functional problems. The hospital of the future will probably be smaller and more intensive in the nature of its care. In part, this is because many present and future clinical technologies can be delivered outside of the hospital setting. And communication technologies offer the possibility of tying the various parts of the health care system into one true system. This would mean that the future hospital would have a more active role in supervising technical care outside of the hospital, and in making specialized knowledge accessible in all parts of the health system.

Clinical experience with a computerized record and verify system

To improve the quality of patient care by detecting and preventing many types of treatment mistakes, we have implemented a computerized system for recording and verifying external beam radiation treatments on our therapy machines. It inhibits the radiation beam if treatment machine settings do not agree with prescribed values to within maximum permissible deviations (tolerances). The tolerances are determined from experience and adjusted when necessary to make the system more effective and less susceptible to "false alarms." The system uses a common data base for all treatment machines. As a result, it permits statistical analysis and generation of reports based on data encompassing the entire patient population as well as verification of treatments of patients transferred from one machine to another. Reports of verification failures reveal patterns of mistakes. Knowing these, attempts can be made to reduce the frequency of verification failures. "Significant" mistakes that were prevented are extracted by treatment planning personnel from these reports. Analysis of data indicates a rate of approximately 150 "significant" mistakes detected and prevented per machine per year, representing 1.0% of all fields treated. We present and discuss our experiences with the system and with the frequency, patterns, and significance of verification failures. We selected a few of the patients for whose treatments significant set-up mistakes were made, and were detected and prevented by the Record and Verify System. We include discussions of the overall effect these mistakes would have had on dose distribution had they not been prevented.

A computerized record and verify system for radiation treatments

We have developed a general purpose, comprehensive, and highly reliable computerized Record and Verify System to detect and prevent mistakes in the delivery of external beam radiation therapy. This system helps prevent accidental delivery of dangerous dose, improves quality control, and provides invaluable record keeping and report generating capabilities. Currently, treatment machine and couch parameter settings of four different machines are monitored by the system and compared with prescribed values. The system inhibits a machine from being turned on if the settings do not agree with the prescribed values to within specified maximum permissible deviations. The system is user-friendly and provides useful, complete, and easily accessible data. We describe many aspects of the system including hardware, software, data, and operation, and we conclude with a brief discussion of clinical experience and preliminary data.

Development of quality assurance in radiation therapy in North America

Although diagnostic radiology developed rapidly following Roentgen's discovery, limitations on voltage delayed penetrating external radiation therapy until after World War II. Quality assurance has developed in both the USA and Canada in many different institutions. Tolerances for implementation of the prescribed tumor dose have been established. A series of quality assurance procedures for calibration, three dimensional dose distributions, the treatment planning process, and for treatment delivery have been formulated in protocols and their development is sketched briefly. The importance of computerized tomography in treatment planning and computerized record and verify systems in treatment delivery is emphasized.