Phase I trials of WR-2721 and cis-platinum

Cyclophosphamide-Induced Inflammation of Taste Buds and Cytoprotection by Amifostine

Taste buds in the oral cavity have a complex immune system regulating normal functions and inflammatory reactions. Cyclophosphamide (CYP), a chemotherapy drug, has wide-ranging disruptive effects on the taste system including loss of taste function, taste sensory cells, and capacity for taste cell renewal. In bladder epithelium, CYP also induces inflammation. To determine if CYP induces inflammation in taste buds, we used immunohistochemistry to examine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (a proinflammatory cytokine) expression over a 72-hour period. Expression of TNF-α increased in a subset of PLCβ2 labeled (Type II) cells, but not SNAP-25 labeled (Type III) cells, between 8 and 24 h postinjection and declined slowly thereafter. This inflammatory response may play an important role in the disruptive effects of CYP on the taste system. Further, pretreatment with amifostine, a sulfhydryl drug known to protect normal tissues during chemo- or radiation therapy, reduced the amount of CYP-induced TNF-α expression in taste buds, suggesting this drug is capable of protecting normal cells of the taste system from adverse effects of CYP. Amifostine, used as a pretreatment to CYP and possibly other chemotherapy drugs, may offer clinical support for preventing negative side effects of chemotherapy on the taste system.

Review : Amifostine and other chemoprotective agents in cancer chemotherapy: A brief review

Objective. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is a frequently, and increasingly, used treatment for malignant disease and is associated with substantial toxicity. A number of drugs have been developed in recent years for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced toxicity. Most are specific to one group of drugs, eg, mesna and the oxazophosphorines, or one type of toxicity, eg, the 5-HT3 antagonist antiemetics. The first multiorgan cytoprotective, amifostine, recently was launched, and another, glutathione, is under development. The purpose of this review is to con sider the agents currently available for the manage ment of cytotoxic drug-induced toxicity and their place in treatment. Special attention is directed to amifostine and drugs in development, including glu tathione, Ossirene (Baker Norton), ORG-2766, and dexrazoxane and less to agents in routine clinical use.

Data sources. A variety of sources were used, including manual and on-line (Medline) literature searching. Approved and other drug names were used as the primary search terms, linked with cytotoxic chemotherapy where limitation was required. Medi cal information departments of drug companies also were used where appropriate.

Study selection. Particular attention was directed to randomized clinical trials, but nonrandomised and animal studies were considered where appropriate.

Conclusions. Over the past decade significant advances have been made in the control of chemo therapy-induced toxicity and new agents promise even greater control. This is important, not only because they may improve the quality of life of conventionally treated cancer patients, but also be cause they should allow the dose-response relation ship for cytotoxic drug treatment to be fully explored. Unfortunately, the data available at present are insuf ficient to determine the extent to which this promise will be fulfilled.

Neurotoxicity caused by the treatment with platinum analogues

Platinum agents (cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin) are a class of chemotherapy agents that have a broad spectrum of activity against several solid tumors. Toxicity to the peripheral nervous system is the major dose-limiting toxicity of at least some of the platinum drugs of clinical interest. Among the platinum compounds in clinical use, cisplatin is the most neurotoxic, inducing mainly sensory neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities. Carboplatin is generally considered to be less neurotoxic than cisplatin, but it is associated with a higher risk of neurological dysfunction if administered at high dose or in combination with agents considered to be neurotoxic. Oxaliplatin induces two types of peripheral neuropathy, acute and chronic. The incidence of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy is related to various risk factors such as treatment schedule, cumulative dose, and time of infusion. To date, several neuroprotective agents including thiol compounds, vitamin E, various anticonvulsants, calcium-magnesium infusions, and other nonpharmacological strategies have been tested for their ability to prevent platinum-induced neurotoxicity with controversial results. Further studies on the prevention and treatment of neurotoxicity of platinum analogues are warranted.

Amifostine protects against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children with average-risk medulloblastoma

PURPOSE

To determine the role of amifostine as a protectant against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in patients with average-risk (AR) medulloblastoma treated with craniospinal radiotherapy and four cycles of cisplatin-based, dose-intense chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary objective was to determine whether, in patients with AR medulloblastoma (n = 62), amifostine would decrease the need for hearing aids (defined as >or= grade 3 ototoxicity in one ear) compared with a control group (n = 35), 1 year from initiating treatment. Ninety-seven patients received craniospinal irradiation (23.4 Gy) followed by 55.8 Gy to the primary tumor bed using three-dimensional conformal technique, and four cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide (4,000 mg/m(2)/cycle), cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)/cycle), and vincristine (two 1.5 mg/m(2) doses/cycle) and stem-cell rescue. When used, amifostine (600 mg/m(2)/dose) was administered as a bolus immediately before and 3 hours into the cisplatin infusion.

RESULTS

The median age of the 97 patients was 8.7 years (range, 3.2 to 20.2 years). The study and control groups were similar in age and sex distribution. Amifostine was well-tolerated. One year after treatment initiation, 13 patients (37.1%) in the control group versus nine (14.5%; one-sided chi(2) test P = .005) of the amifostine-treated patients had at least grade 3 ototoxicity, requiring hearing aid in at least one ear.

CONCLUSION

Amifostine administered before and during the cisplatin infusion can significantly reduce the risk of severe ototoxicity in patients with AR medulloblastoma receiving dose-intense chemotherapy.

High-Dose Cisplatin With Amifostine: Ototoxicity and Pharmacokinetics

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Ototoxicity is a common side effect of high-dose cisplatin treatment. Thiol-containing chemoprotectors ameliorate cisplatin ototoxicity under experimental conditions. The trial was initiated to test the efficacy of amifostine protection in high-dose cisplatin treatment (125-150 mg/m) for metastatic malignant melanoma, to correlate the ototoxic outcome with cisplatin pharmacokinetics, and to evaluate the importance of using a selective analytical method for the quantification of cisplatin.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study of 15 patients with stage IV malignant melanoma.

METHODS

Clinical follow-up of therapeutic response, pure-tone audiometry, and analysis of cisplatin and its monohydrated complex in blood ultrafiltrate by liquid chromatography with postcolumn derivatization were performed. Ultrafiltered blood platinum was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Ototoxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity were the most prominent side effects. Three patients ultimately required hearing aids. All patients had audiometric changes at one or more frequencies after the second treatment course, and all but one patient reported auditory symptoms. No correlation was found between hearing loss and blood cisplatin pharmacokinetics. Platinum levels determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry were higher than total platinum levels calculated from cisplatin and monohydrated complex concentrations obtained by liquid chromatography analysis.

CONCLUSION

Ototoxicity was unacceptable despite amifostine treatment. Cisplatin pharmacokinetics during the first treatment course were not predictive of hearing loss. Amifostine caused a lowering of dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve for cisplatin and monohydrated complex. Use of the unselective inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis leads to an overestimation of active drug. Selective analysis of cisplatin is especially important when evaluating cisplatin pharmacokinetics during chemoprotector treatment.

Limited access trial using amifostine for protection against cisplatin- and three-hour paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether amifostine (WR-2721) prevents or ameliorates clinically significant (grade 2 to 4) neurotoxicity associated with cisplatin and 3-hour paclitaxel chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The chemotherapy program consisted of intravenous paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours followed by amifostine 740 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 administered over 90 minutes beginning 15 minutes after amifostine administration. At baseline, before each treatment cycle, and for 3 months after completing chemotherapy, patients were evaluated for evidence of neurotoxicity and other treatment-related adverse effects using three methods: standard clinical evaluation (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [CTC] grading), a neurotoxicity questionnaire to assess symptoms and limitations imposed by peripheral neuropathy, and vibration perception threshold (VPT) testing.

RESULTS

Four of 27 assessable patients developed grade 2 to 4 neurotoxicity based on clinical assessments and CTC grading. This number of neuropathic events exceeded the predetermined threshold level for a second stage of accrual and the study was closed.

CONCLUSION

Amifostine's level of activity in this trial was insufficient to warrant further study in a phase III trial. Based on the receiver operating characteristic analysis, it would appear that VPT measurements are less sensitive to the development of peripheral neuropathy than the neurotoxicity questionnaire. The questionnaire, referred to as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity, may be used instead of VPT measurements in future studies of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Toxicity of platinum compounds

Since the introduction of platinum-based combination chemotherapy, particularly cisplatin, the outcome of the treatment of many solid tumours has changed. The leading platinum compounds in cancer chemotherapy are cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin. They share some structural similarities; however, there are marked differences between them in therapeutic use, pharmacokinetics and adverse effects profiles [1-4]. Compared to cisplatin, carboplatin has inferior efficacy in germ-cell tumour, head and neck cancer and bladder and oesophageal carcinoma, whereas both drugs seem to have comparable efficacy in advanced non-small cell and small cell lung cancer as well as ovarian cancer [5-7]. Oxaliplatin belongs to the group of diaminocyclohexane platinum compounds. It is the first platinum-based drug that has marked efficacy in colorectal cancer when given in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid [8,9]. Other platinum compounds such as oral JM216, ZD0473, BBR3464 and SPI-77, which is a pegylated liposomal formulation of cisplatin, are still under investigation [10-13], whereas nedaplatin has been approved in Japan for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and other solid tumours. This review focuses on cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin.

Use of amifostine in the therapy of osteosarcoma in children and adolescents

Amifostine protects normal tissue from the cytotoxic damage induced by radiation and chemotherapy. In this study, 39 consecutive newly diagnosed children with osteosarcoma were assessed; 20 received amifostine and 19 did not. The chemotherapy regimen included an induction phase of three cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m2), carboplatin (500 mg/m2), and doxorubicin (60 mg/m2), followed by surgery. Alternating cycles of cisplatin/ifosfamide (9 mg/m2), ifosfamide/doxorubicin, carboplatin/doxorubicin, and ifosfamide/carboplatin were administered every 3 weeks to complete 26 weeks of treatment. Amifostine was administered 15 minutes before the infusions of cisplatin and carboplatin in a total of 193 infusions. Side effects during infusions and renal, hearing, and bone marrow toxicities were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Hypotension was observed in 28 (14.5%) infusions. No patient required discontinuation of therapy. Fewer than two episodes of vomiting occurred in 130 (71%) infusions and two to five episodes occurred in 51 (28%) infusions, and no patient had grade 4 toxicity. There was no difference between the two groups regarding renal toxicity (creatinine clearance). Neutropenia and leukopenia were significantly less frequent in the amifostine group. No difference was observed in platelet and hearing toxicities. Amifostine was well tolerated in doses of 740 mg/m2 in children and adolescents, and myelotoxicity was less severe in the amifostine group. This was a pilot study for further evaluation in a larger randomized trial.

Redox reactions of tocopherol monoglucoside in aqueous solutions: a pulse radiolysis study

The reactions between tocopherol monoglucoside (TMG), a water-soluble vitamin-E derivative, with Br2.-, N3., (SCN)2.-, NO2., OH. and various halogenated peroxyl radicals were examined using a pulse radiolysis technique. The results demonstrate that TMG forms a stable phenoxyl radical at pH > 6.8. The thus-formed phenoxyl radical shows pH-dependent decay kinetics and is disproportionated by 2nd order kinetics at pH 2.3. It was observed that the TMG reactivity towards a halogenated peroxyl radical increases with the number of halogen atoms at the carbon atom having a peroxyl group. The reaction between the TMG phenoxyl radical and ascorbic acid was also examined using a pulse radiolysis technique. The results indicate that the TMG phenoxyl radical is repaired by ascorbate. Kinetic studies indicate that TMG may act as an antioxidant to repair free-radical damage to some biologically important compounds. The one-electron reduction potential for TMG was found to be 0.522 V +/- 0.06 vs. NHE.

A Phase II trial of cisplatin plus WR-2721 (amifostine) for metastatic breast carcinoma: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E8188)

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin has minimal antitumor activity when used as second- or third-line treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. Older reports suggest an objective response rate of 8% when 60-120 mg/m2 of cisplatin is administered every 3-4 weeks. Although a dose-response effect has been observed with cisplatin, the dose-limiting toxicities associated with cisplatin (e.g., nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity) have limited its use as a treatment for breast carcinoma. WR-2721 or amifostine initially was developed to protect military personnel in the event of nuclear war. Amifostine subsequently was shown to protect normal tissues from the toxic effects of alkylating agents and cisplatin without decreasing the antitumor effect of the chemotherapy. Early trials of cisplatin and amifostine also suggested that the incidence and severity of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neuropathy were reduced.

METHODS

A Phase II study of the combination of cisplatin plus amifostine was conducted in patients with progressive metastatic breast carcinoma who had received one, but not more than one, chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease. Patients received amifostine, 910 mg/m2 intravenously over 15 minutes. After completion of the amifostine infusion, cisplatin 120 mg/m2 was administered over 30 minutes. Intravenous hydration and mannitol was administered before and after cisplatin. Treatment was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study of which 7 (16%) were ineligible. A median of 2 cycles of therapy was administered to the 37 eligible patients. Six partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 16%. Most patients (57%) stopped treatment because of disease progression. Neurologic toxicity was reported in 52% of patients. Seven different life-threatening toxicities were observed in patients while receiving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of cisplatin and amifostine in this study resulted in an overall response rate of 16%. Neither a tumor-protective effect nor reduced toxicity to normal tissues was observed with the addition of amifostine to cisplatin in this trial.

A prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded pilot study of misoprostol rectal suppositories in the prevention of acute and chronic radiation proctitis symptoms in prostate cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Radiation proctitis is a known complication of radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Available medical treatment is usually ineffective and has focused on relieving symptoms after damage has occurred. Our study aimed at evaluating the use of misoprostol rectal suppositories in the prevention of acute as well as chronic radiation proctitis symptoms.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial was conducted in patients with recently diagnosed stages B and C prostate cancer who underwent external beam irradiation. Patients received either a misoprostol or a placebo suppository 1 h before each radiation session. Misoprostol suppositories were made from two 200-microg tablets (Cytotec, Searle Pharmaceuticals, Skokie, IL), whereas the placebo was made from cocoa butter. A 12-point radiation proctitis symptom score was obtained from each patient at 4, 8, 12, and 36 wk after radiation therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were enrolled. Seven patients received placebo, and nine patients received misoprostol. Mean radiation proctitis symptom scores in the placebo group were 4.86, 5.86, 5.71, and 3.83 at 4, 8, 12, and 36 wk, respectively. The mean scores in the misoprostol group were 0.78, 0.67, 0.33, and 0.37 at 4, 8, 12, and 36 wk, respectively. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at 4, 8, 12, and 36 wk.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol rectal suppositories significantly reduce acute and chronic radiation proctitis symptoms in patients receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants

PURPOSE

Because toxicities associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can adversely affect short- and long-term patient quality of life, can limit the dose and duration of treatment, and may be life-threatening, specific agents designed to ameliorate or eliminate certain chemotherapy and radiotherapy toxicities have been developed. Variability in interpretation of the available data pertaining to the efficacy of the three United States Food and Drug Administration-approved agents that have potential chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-protectant activity-dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine-and questions about the role of these protectant agents in cancer care led to concern about the appropriate use of these agents. The American Society of Clinical Oncology sought to establish evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines for the use of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine in patients who are not enrolled on clinical treatment trials.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel reviewed the clinical data regarding the activity of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine. A computerized literature search was performed using MEDLINE. In addition to reports collected by individual Panel members, all articles published in the English-speaking literature from June 1997 through December 1998 were collected for review by the Panel chairpersons, and appropriate articles were distributed to the entire Panel for review. Guidelines for use, levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were reviewed and approved by the Panel. Outcomes considered in evaluating the benefit of a chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-protectant agent included amelioration of short- and long-term chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related toxicities, risk of tumor protection by the agent, toxicity of the protectant agent itself, quality of life, and economic impact. To the extent that these data were available, the Panel placed the greatest value on lesser toxicity that did not carry a concomitant risk of tumor protection.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Mesna: (1) Mesna, dosed as detailed in these guidelines, is recommended to decrease the incidence of standard-dose ifosfamide-associated urothelial toxicity. (2) There is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of mesna to prevent urothelial toxicity with ifosfamide doses that exceed 2.5 g/m(2)/d. (3) Either mesna or forced saline diuresis is recommended to decrease the incidence of urothelial toxicity associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide use in the stem-cell transplantation setting. Dexrazoxane: (1) The use of dexrazoxane is not routinely recommended for patients with metastatic breast cancer who receive initial doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. (2) The use of dexrazoxane may be considered for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received a cumulative dosage of 300 mg/m(2) or greater of doxorubicin in the metastatic setting and who may benefit from continued doxorubicin-containing therapy. (3) The use of dexrazoxane in the adjuvant setting is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. (4) The use of dexrazoxane can be considered in adult patients who have received more than 300 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin-based therapy for tumors other than breast cancer, although caution should be used in settings in which doxorubicin-based therapy has been shown to improve survival because of concerns of tumor protection by dexrazoxane. (5) There is insufficient evidence to make a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in the treatment of pediatric malignancies, with epirubicin-based regimens, or with high-dose anthracycline-containing regimens. Similarly, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in patients with cardiac risk factors or underlying cardiac disease. (6) Patients receiving dexrazoxane should continue to be monitored for cardiac toxicity. Amifostine: (1) Amifostine may be considered for the reduction of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoth

Comparison of Five Agents in Protecting the Cochlea Against the Ototoxic Effects of Cisplatin in the Hamster

The purpose of this investigation was to study the ameliorating effects of four agents on cis-platin-induced ototoxicity. Hamsters were given a series of five cisplatin injections either alone or in combination with sodium thiosulfate (STS), diethyldihydrothiocarbamate (DDTC), and S-2(3-aminopropylamino) ethylphosphorothiolc acid (WR-2721), or fosfomycin. Ototoxicity was assessed anatomically by quantifying the extent of cochlear damage with the scanning electron microscope and physiologically with measures of the auditory brain stem response. When administered alone, cisplatin induced widespread loss of outer hair cells (OHCs) along much of the cochlea in the hamster, especially in the basal and middle turns, with an average survival of only 56% of the OHC population. In contrast, inner hair cells resisted cisplatin ototoxicity in the hamster. Thus the ameliorative effects of the different test agents were assessed by counting the number of surviving OHCs in each treatment group and comparing with cisplatin-treated controls. STS provided the most effective protection against the ototoxic effects of cisplatin, yielding 91% survival of OHCs. DDTC also reduced the ototoxic effects of cisplatin, yielding 68% survival of OHCs. Cotreatment with WR-2721 and fosfomycin yielded 45% and 52% OHC survival, respectively, and thus did not provide any chemoprotection. The results closely paralleled those based on auditory brain stem response recordings in that the magnitude of threshold shift was proportional to the amount of OHC loss; also, the amount of threshold shift at each frequency was in good agreement with the pattern of hair cell loss along the cochlear spiral. Thus both histologic and physiologic results suggest that STS and DDTC hold promise for ameliorating the ototoxic effects of cisplatin chemotherapy.

Phase II evaluation of cisplatin and WR2721 for refractory metastatic breast cancer

Cisplatin, as second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), has at best shown only modest response rates. At high doses, the toxicity profile of this drug may outweigh any potential benefits for MBC patients. We performed a phase II study to determine whether the investigational agent WR2721 would mitigate the toxicity of cisplatin in patients with MBC and to assess the antitumor response of cisplatin as salvage therapy. Thirteen women were enrolled in the study. Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 120 mg/m2 together with WR2721 at a dose of 910 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days. Response was assessed at the end of two cycles, and toxicity was evaluated after each treatment cycle. No objective antitumor responses were noted. Three patients exhibited toxicity from cisplatin in the form of ototoxicity, nephrotoxicity, myelotoxicity, and persistent delayed nausea and vomiting necessitating discontinuation from the study. There was one death from renal failure. WR2721 itself caused significant but transient hypotension in 46% of the patients. In our experience, salvage chemotherapy with cisplatin in pretreated patients with MBC produced no objective responses. WR2721 did not prevent the occurrence of organ toxicity.

Exploration of platinum-based dose-intensive chemotherapy strategies with amifostine (Ethyol)

The preclinical evaluation of amifostine confirms selective protection of normal tissues against toxicity due to cisplatin therapy while maintaining the antitumour effects. The mechanism of protection relates to the selective uptake of the free thiol, amifostine, into normal tissue compared with tumour tissue, intracellular binding and therefore detoxification of anticancer drugs, as well as through the scavenging of oxygen free radicals. Although vigorous hydration schedules have helped to alleviate nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity and cumulative dose-related peripheral neuropathy, these side effects remain important dose-limiting toxicities related to cisplatin therapy. The preclinical and clinical results to date demonstrate that amifostine can protect against cisplatin toxicities, in particular nephrotoxicity. Recent studies have demonstrated that higher single and cumulative cisplatin doses have an important impact on survival outcome; however, the improvement in survival comes at the cost of increased acute and cumulative haematological, renal and neurological toxicities that can result in serious morbidity. The role of amifostine as a unique supportive measure to reduce these toxicities offers the possibility of improving the quality of life of patients receiving chemotherapy.

Degradation of 2-(3-aminopropylamino)-ethanethiol (WR-1065) by Cu-dependent amine oxidases and influence on glutathione status of Chinese hamster ovary cells

The radioprotective drug 2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethanethiol (WR-1065) can be degraded when incubated in cell culture medium in vitro. The degradation reaction consumes oxygen and results from the action of Cu-dependent amine oxidases present in the serum content of the medium. Analysis of the degradation products of WR-1065 demonstrates the formation of cysteamine, acrolein and H2O2. WR-2721, the inactive prodrug of WR-1065, is not a substrate for these enzymes. Extracellular degradation of WR-1065 by Cu-dependent amine oxidases leads to an intracellular depletion of glutathione (GSH) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and to reduction of clonogenic cell survival. Addition of aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of Cu-dependent amine oxidases, protects CHO cells from the toxic effects of WR-1065 and under these conditions an increase of intracellular GSH levels occurs. These data demonstrate that WR-1065 can be degraded to toxic compounds by the presence of Cu-dependent amine oxidases which might have further implications for the clinical use of WR-2721.

Mechanisms of protection of hematopoietic stem cells from irradiation

Current therapies for the treatment of malignancies are associated with significant limitations to the hematopoietic system since chemotherapy and radiation therapy do not discriminate between normal and malignant cells. Since bone marrow depression occurs at low to midlethal doses of irradiation, approaches to improving the therapeutic index of treatment must include measures to enhance the sensitivity of the tumor relative to normal hematopoietic tissue or, by reducing toxicity to normal hematopoietic tissues leaving tumor resistance unchanged. Radioprotective agents have been proposed to unravel the fundamental processes by which radiation itself damages hematopoietic tissue. In radiotherapy, the importance of these agents is derived from their potential use as selective protectors against radiation damage to normal hematopoietic tissue such that higher doses of radiation can be delivered to tumors to achieve a therapeutic advantage. A variety of agents have been and are being evaluated as possible protectants. These include aminothiols, synthetic polysaccharides, vitamins and cytokines. This review attempts to summarize the role both chemical and biological response modifiers play as hematopoietic radioprotectors. In addition, possible mechanisms of protection of hematopoietic stem cells from irradiation are discussed.

Radiation and chemotherapy sensitizers and protectors

Radiosensitizers and radioprotectors are part of the chemical modifier approach to cancer therapy whereby the state of the tumor cells and/or normal tissues are modified such that a therapeutic gain is achieved using conventional radiation or chemotherapy. Radiosensitization can be achieved by the use of oxygen-mimetic compounds, agents that alter DNA sensitivity to irradiation, maneuvers that alter DNA repair processes, and manipulation of tissue oxygenation. Standard chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin can be utilized in a manner that optimizes the radiosensitization properties. Protection and sensitization can occur by altering the thiol status of the cell. The chemical modifiers field is both developing novel approaches to cancer treatment and increasing the understanding of basic cancer biology.

Cisplatin rescue therapy: experience with sodium thiosulfate, WR2721, and diethyldithiocarbamate

Cisplatin has a steep dose response curve for both antitumor and adverse effects. Therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing toxicity and allowing dose escalation of intravenous cisplatin, such as administration in hypertonic saline and pharmacokinetically based dosing schedules, have been partially successful in reducing nephrotoxicity and bone marrow suppression. However, new dose-limiting toxicities consisting of peripheral neuropathy and ototoxicity have emerged, which continue to restrict potential use of high dose cisplatin therapy. Intraperitoneal administration of high dose cisplatin also offers the potential of markedly increased local drug exposure if systemic toxicity can be avoided. Proposed chemoprotective agents, including sodium thiosulfate, WR2721, and diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) are being extensively examined as "rescue agents" for either regional or systemic administration of cisplatin. Although each agent offers unique advantages to be considered in developing successful rescue therapy, many questions remain regarding molecular and pharmacokinetic interactions with cisplatin, appropriate dosing schedules, and effects on antineoplastic activity. We present a review of current investigations of chemoprotectors for prevention of cisplatin-related toxicities.

Clinical trials of WR-2721 and cis-platinum

WR-2721 is an aminothiol compound; in the animal model it protects against the nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and hematologic toxicity of cis-platinum. We initiated Phase I trials of WR-2721 and cis-platinum to determine toxicity when WR-2721 was given prior to escalating doses of cis-platinum. With mannitol diuresis and WR-2721, transient nephrotoxicity occurred in 9 of 30 (27%) patients treated with cis-platinum 150 mg/m2 and 7% of patients given with cis-platinum 120 mg/m2. Bone marrow suppression was mild and infrequent. Mild to moderate peripheral neuropathies occurred in 26% of patients courses following a mean cumulative cis-platinum dose of 725 mg/m2. Objective partial responses were observed in 53 of 118 (45%) patients with measurable disease. Antitumor responses were observed in 25 of 53 patients with metastatic melanoma, 12 of 22 patients with locally recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer, and 7 of 13 patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to conventional chemotherapy. Controlled studies of WR-2721 and cis-platinum will be performed in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group in these disease sites to better define the activity of this regimen and its toxicity.

Effect of diethyldithiocarbamate on toxicity of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) on mice haemopoietic progenitor cells

DBA/2NCr1BR F1 mice received a single i.v. injection of doxorubicin (4.32, 7.20 or 12.00 mg kg-1), cyclophosphamide (70, 120 or 200 mg kg-1) or cis-diamminechloroplatinum (5.4, 9.0 or 15.0 mg kg-1), alone or 2 h before an i.p. injection of 1,000 mg kg-1 of diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC). Twenty-four hours after, survival of bone marrow colony forming units-spleen and granulocyte-macrophage colony forming cells, was determined. On the whole, administration of DDTC reduced the toxic effect of the three anticancer drugs on haemopoietic progenitors. The effect was in general more evident at the lower than at the higher doses of the antitumour drugs.

The effect of 2-[(aminopropyl)amino] ethanethiol on fission-neutron-induced DNA damage and repair

The effect(s) of the radioprotector 2-[(aminopropyl)amino] ethanethiol (WR 1065) on fission-neutron-induced DNA damage and repair in V79 Chinese hamster cells was determined by using a neutral filter elution procedure (pH 7.2). When required, WR1065, at a final working concentration of 4 mM, was added to the culture medium, either 30 min before and during irradiation with fission spectrum neutrons (beam energy of 0.85 MeV) from the JANUS research reactor, or for selected intervals of time following exposure. The frequency of neutron-induced DNA strand breaks as measured by neutral elution as a function of dose equalled that observed for 60Co gamma-ray-induced damage (relative biological effectiveness of one). In contrast to the protective effect exhibited by WR1065 in reducing 60Co-induced DNA damage, WR1065 was ineffective in reducing or protecting against induction of DNA strand breaks by JANUS neutrons. The kinetics of DNA double-strand rejoining were measured following neutron irradiation. In the absence of WR1065, considerable DNA degradation by cellular enzymes was observed. This process was inhibited when WR1065 was present. These results indicate that, under the conditions used, the quality (i.e. nature), rather than quantity, of DNA lesions (measured by neutral elution) formed by neutrons was significantly different from that formed by gamma-rays.

Biochemical modulation of cisplatin toxicity

The biochemical modulation of cisplatin toxicity has contributed substantially to the safe and effective administration of cisplatin in the clinic. In most cases, however, the demonstration of clinical efficacy has preceded the understanding of mechanisms by which these agents provide protection to normal tissues. A number of protocols are now available to ameliorate cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity; these approaches have been so successful that renal toxicity is rarely of clinical significance today. However, the dramatic escalation in cisplatin dose engendered by the use of modulators has resulted in new dose-limiting toxicities involving the nervous system and the bone marrow. Although preliminary data suggests that certain modulators may reduce these toxicities, extensive clinical trials will be necessary to substantiate the beneficial effects in the clinic. Further clinical studies will also be necessary to determine the optimum scheduling for the newer agents and to provide convincing evidence of efficacy in man. Finally, modulator combinations (i.e. DDTC and hypertonic saline) have the potential to provide the broadest coverage of normal tissue protection and appear to merit more extensive clinical investigation. Cisplatin has demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy at currently tolerated doses; further advances in the biochemical modulation of cisplatin toxicity should provide significant therapeutic gains for this important drug in the future.

Glutathione monoethyl ester can selectively protect liver from high dose BCNU or cyclophosphamide

Normal Swiss Webster mice were treated with monocrotaline or high doses of three antitumor alkylating agents (BCNU, cyclophosphamide, or mitomycin C), all of which have been connected with hepatic veno-occlusive disease at our clinic. Prior administration of WR-2721 did not improve the survival of monocrotaline-treated animals. Glutathione (GSH) improved the survival of these animals to a small degree. Glutathione monoethyl ester (GSHet) almost completely protected animals from the toxicity of monocrotaline. Pretreatment with WR-2721 produced moderate increases in survival at the highest doses of BCNU, and at the lower BCNU doses none of the animals pretreated with WR-2721 died before they were killed on day 150. Pretreatment with GSHet gave good protection from BCNU toxicity at the highest dose of the drug, and there were no deaths in the groups of animals treated with GSHet 1 hour before BCNU. On a multiple dose schedule, GSH provided some protection from cyclophosphamide toxicity; GSHet gave a very good level of protection from cyclophosphamide. In none of these treatment groups were lesions suggestive of hepatic or pulmonary venoocclusive disease identified. In all three experimental protocols (monocrotaline, BCNU, and cyclophosphamide), there was a consistent decrease in hepatic toxicity after GSHet pretreatment; this was not observed in GSH- or WR-2721-pretreated animals. There was no evidence of protection of the FSaIIC fibrosarcoma growing in C3H mice as assayed by tumor growth delay or tumor cell survival in groups treated with two different doses of GSHet 1 hour before each drug injection compared to those treated with the BCNU or cyclophosphamide alone, or BCNU with cyclophosphamide. Pretreatment with GSHet did not alter the toxicity of these drugs to bone marrow. GSHet appears to be an effective protector of critical normal tissue and does not appear to protect tumor.

Characterization of the reactions of platinum antitumor agents with biologic and nonbiologic sulfur-containing nucleophiles

Substitution reactions with biologic nucleophiles appear to govern the antitumor and toxic properties of platinum complexes. In this paper we have characterized the reactions of several platinum antitumor agents with sulfur-containing amino acids, peptides, proteins, and nonbiologic nucleophiles. The rate constants for the reactions of trans-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (trans-DDP), cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (DDP), diammine (1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum(II) (CBDCA) and cis-diisopropylamine-cis-dichloro-trans-dihydroxy platinum(IV) (CHIP) with cysteine (Cys), methionine (Met), and glutathione (GSH) were determined at 37 degrees. A reactivity ratio of 1:1.5:22:6500 was determined for the reaction of GSH with CHIP, CBDCA, DDP, and trans-DDP respectively. The rate constant for the binding of DDP to DNA, 7.4 X 10(-5) sec-1, decreased to 5.9 X 10(-5) sec-1 and 1.7 X 10(-5) sec-1 in the presence of 0.5 and 5 mM GSH respectively. The products formed in the reaction of GSH with trans-DDP, DDP, and CBDCA were also examined. Under conditions of high platinum concentration (2-3 mM), CBDCA and DDP form large molecular weight species with GSH as indicated by 1H-NMR and ultrafiltration experiments. The complex [Pt(GSH)2 X 3H2O]n was isolated from the reaction of 3 mM DDP with 6 mM GSH. The product formed in the reaction of 3 mM trans-DDP with 6 mM GSH was not macromolecular in nature, and 1H-NMR spectra revealed that platinum was bound to the Cys sulfhydryl group. Rate constants were determined for the reactions of these platinum complexes with diethyldithiocarbamate (DDTC) and thiosulfate, two agents known to reduce platinum-mediated nephrotoxicity. DDTC, but not thiosulfate, was shown to rapidly chelate platinum from [Pt(GSH)2 X 3H2O]n. The effects of DDP, CBDCA, and CHIP on the sulfhydryl-dependent rat renal proximal tubule membrane enzymes alkaline phosphatase (AP), gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGTP), leucine aminopeptidase (LAP), and the Na+/K+- and Mg2+-adenosine-5'-triphosphatases (ATPases) were also investigated in vitro. The ability of platinum complexes to inhibit these enzymes parallels their reactivity with other nucleophiles. DDTC and thiourea were shown to restore activity to platinum-inhibited enzymes. Chloride ion was found to reduce platinum-mediated enzyme inhibition in an unpredictable manner, the greatest effect being observed with LAP and GGTP and the least with the ATPases. None of these renal enzymes was directly inhibited by DDP in vivo.

Protection by WR-2721 of human bone marrow function following irradiation

Protection by WR-2721 of bone marrow (BM) from depression following hemibody irradiation (HBI) was assessed in patients receiving palliative therapy for widespread symptomatic metastasis on a Phase I/II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol. Twenty-five patients are currently evaluable for the assessment of hematologic toxicity. HBI (600 or 700 cGy) was delivered starting 15-30 min after WR-2721 (600-900 mg/m2) intravenous infusion. Twenty patients from previous RTOG HBI studies were comparable in terms of radiation dose, hematologic data, and previous cytotoxic therapy. The WBC and platelet count nadirs at any time within 6 wk following HBI were used for data analysis, and toxicity was rated according to RTOG criteria. For the patients treated with WR-2721, moderate, severe, or life-threatening toxicity were seen in 16%, 12%, and 0% of the patients, respectively, compared to 30%, 15%, and 10% of patients in the group not treated with WR-2721. For the subpopulation of patients treated with the higher irradiation dose (700 cGy), differences in toxicity appeared to be greater. Conversely, for the sub-population of patients treated only to the upper hemibody, the difference in toxicity was less apparent. The percentage change from the median pre-treatment white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts (PC) was not different between the WR-2721 treated and non-treated group; however, the median WBC count for the WR-2721 group returned to the pre-treatment value by the fourth week following HBI, whereas, it remained at 61% of the pre-HBI value for the control group. Within the group of patients treated with WR-2721, 5 of 17 (29%) receiving 600 mg/m2 demonstrated a greater than 75% decline in either WBC or platelets, compared to 0/8 patients treated with 750-900 mg/m2. These preliminary data support a protective effect by WR-2721 on radiation-induced bone marrow depression in humans, which may become more apparent with the use of higher radiation and WR-2721 doses.

Phase I/II trials of WR-2721 and cis-platinum

Renal dysfunction is a well-known dose-limiting toxicity of cis-platinum. Previous studies demonstrated a 32% incidence of nephrotoxicity following a 100 mg/M2 single dose of cis-platinum with mannitol diuresis. WR-2721 is an aminothiol which in the animal model improves renal tolerance to cis-platinum by factors of 1.3 to 1.7. Phase I trials were initiated to establish the toxicity when WR-2721 was given prior to escalating doses of cis-platinum. Fifty-two patients received 161 courses of WR-2721 prior to cis-platinum (60-150 mg/M2) with mannitol and hydration. Nephrotoxicity, measured by twice weekly serum creatinines and monthly creatinine clearances, occurred in only 10/97 (10%) courses with 120 mg/M2 of cis-platinum. No patient experienced a creatinine elevation after 135 mg/M2 of cis-platinum. With 150 mg/M2 of cis-platinum, 6/17 (35%) courses were associated with transient nephrotoxicity. Five patients who developed transient creatinine elevations following 150 gm/M2 of cis-platinum were subsequently retreated with WR-2721 and cis-platinum (100 mg/M2) without nephrotoxicity. Bone marrow suppression was mild and infrequent. Mild to moderate peripheral neuropathies were noted in seven patients following cumulative cis-platinum doses ranging from 460-1160 mg/M2. Objective partial responses were observed in 26/45 (58%) patients with measurable or evaluable disease. Thus, there is no evidence that WR-2721 protects against the antitumor efficacy of cis-platinum in man. Compared to retrospective series, our data suggest that WR-2721 may provide some protection against platinum-induced nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Controlled trials will be required to define the potential clinical benefit of WR-2721 and cis-platinum.

Human pharmacokinetics of WR-2721

The pharmacokinetic properties of WR-2721 were investigated in 13 cancer patients given a 150 mg/M2 intravenous bolus dose of the drug. An average plasma clearance value of 2.17 L/min was obtained. Very little of the drug or the two metabolites, WR-1065 and WR-33278, were excreted in urine obtained after the blood collection schedule. Plasma concentrations of WR-2721 decreased by 94% within 6 minutes of drug administration. The mean value of 6.44 L obtained for the steady-state volume of distribution indicates that the extravascular space occupied by the drug is small. These observations suggest that in human cancer patients, WR-2721 is rapidly taken up by tissues and converted to metabolites.

Hydrolysis of S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioate (WR-2721)

The hydrolysis reaction of S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioate (WR-2721), a radioprotective agent currently undergoing clinical trials, was studied under a variety of experimental conditions in order to provide more complete data and to reconcile significant differences found between two previous studies. 31P NMR spectroscopy was primarily used to follow the reaction, but comparable results were also obtained in parallel studies using a spectrophotometric technique and a technique involving liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection, in which the free sulfhydryl product, 2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethanethiol (WR-1065), was measured. Upon hydrolysis, inorganic phosphate and the free sulfhydryl group were formed by cleavage of the P-S bond. The reaction rate versus pH profile at 30 degrees in 42.5 mM buffer, mu = 127.5 mM, showed primarily hydrolysis of the monoanion, with an acid-catalyzed reaction below pH 1.5 to 2.0 involving the neutral species of the ester. The energy of activation at pH 4.0 in 42.5 mM acetate buffer was 25.7 kcal/mole (23.1 kcal/mole by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection). The entropy of activation at pH 4.0, 36 degrees was positive, and there was a deuterium isotope effect on the reaction. A small buffer effect on the rate of the reaction at pH 4.0 and pH 5.0 was found to include contributions from both general acid and general base catalysis. These data are consistent with a mechanism for hydrolysis of the monoanion involving a partially rate-determining proton transfer to the sulfur atom and the formation of metaphosphate ion, which is rapidly hydrolyzed to inorganic phosphate.

Eighth annual Juan del Regato lecture. Chemical modifiers of radiosensitivity--theory and reality: a review

In this review the poor clinical gains from hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and misonidazole (MISO) are discussed critically. The biggest factor reducing clinical gains is almost certainly reoxygenation. Other possible reasons include vasoconstrictive self-limitation of HBO and neurotoxicity of MISO, so that the radiosensitization of any hypoxic cells in human tumors was not adequate. Nevertheless, there have been some positive clinical results, so that hypoxic cells can sometimes be a problem in some tumors, especially those of the head and neck, even after multiple fraction radiotherapy. While hypoxic cell radioresistance is obviously only one form of radioresistance it is a large factor of resistance when hypoxic cells are present. Current developments are briefly reviewed: the 'new' clinical sensitizers Ro-03-8799 and SR-2508 which should be 3 to 10 times more efficient than MISO if viable hypoxic cells are present; and methods of measuring which human tumors might have significant numbers of hypoxic viable cells.