Linac radiosurgery for high-grade gliomas: the University of Florida experience

Survival after hypofractionation in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has a poor prognosis despite a multi modal treatment that includes normofractionated radiotherapy. So, various hypofractionated alternatives to normofractionated RT have been tested to improve such prognosis. There is need of systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the literature properly and maybe generalised the use of hypofractionation. The aim of this study was first, to perform a meta-analysis of all controlled trials testing the impact of hypofractionation on survival without age restriction and secondly, to analyse data from all non-comparative trials testing the impact of hypofractionation, radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic RT in first line.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases to identify all publications testing the impact of hypofractionation in glioblastoma between 1985 and March 2020. Combined hazard ratio from comparative studies was calculated for overall survival. The impact of study design, age and use of adjuvant temozolomide was explored by stratification. Meta-regressions were performed to determine the impact of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

2283 publications were identified. Eleven comparative trials were included. No impact on overall survival was evidenced (HR: 1.07, 95%CI: 0.89-1.28) without age restriction. The analysis of non-comparative literature revealed heterogeneous outcomes with limited quality of reporting. Concurrent chemotherapy, completion of surgery, immobilization device, isodose of prescription, and prescribed dose (depending on tumour volume) were poorly described. However, results on survival are encouraging and were correlated with the percentage of resected patients and with patients age but not with median dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Because few trials were randomized and because the limited quality of reporting, it is difficult to define the place of hypofactionation in glioblastoma. In first line, hypofractionation resulted in comparable survival outcome with the benefit of a shortened duration. The method used to assess hypofractionation needs to be improved.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Standard therapy depends on patient age and performance status but principally involves surgical resection followed by a 6-wk course of radiation therapy given concurrently with temozolomide chemotherapy. Despite such treatment, prognosis remains poor, with a median survival of 16 mo. Challenges in achieving local control, maintaining quality of life, and limiting toxicity plague treatment strategies for this disease. Radiotherapy dose intensification through hypofractionation and stereotactic radiosurgery is a promising strategy that has been explored to meet these challenges. We review the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma.

New Hypofractionation Radiation Strategies for Glioblastoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults, with a median survival of less than 2 years despite the standard of care treatment of 6 weeks of chemoradiotherapy. We review the data investigating hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Investigators have explored alternative radiotherapy strategies that shorten treatment duration with the goal of similar or improved survival while minimizing toxicity. HFRT over 1-3 weeks is already a standard of care for patients with advanced age or poor performance status. For young patients with good performance status, HFRT holds the promise of radiobiologically escalating the dose and potentially improving local control while maintaining quality of life. Through the use of shorter radiotherapy fractionation regimens coupled with novel systemic agents, improved outcomes for patients with GBM may be achieved.

Survival and complications of stereotactic radiosurgery: A systematic review of stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed and recurrent high-grade gliomas

BACKGROUND

Utilization of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) has been slowly increasing with variable reported success rates.

OBJECTIVE

Systematic review of the available data to evaluate the efficacy of SRS as a treatment for HGG with regards to median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), in addition to ascertaining the rate of radiation necrosis and other SRS-related major neurological complications.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed for publications from 1992 to 2016. The pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were calculated as a weighted estimate of population medians. Meta-analyses of published rates of radiation necrosis and other major neurological complications were also performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies reported the use of SRS for recurrent HGG, and 16 studies reported the use of SRS for newly diagnosed HGG. For recurrent HGG, the pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were 5.42 months (3-16 months) and 20.19 months (9-65 months), respectively; the pooled radiation necrosis rate was 5.9% (0-44%); and the pooled estimates of major neurological complications rate was 3.3% (0-23%). For newly diagnosed HGG, the pooled estimates of median PFS and median OS were 7.89 months (5.5-11 months) and 16.87 months (9.5-33 months) respectively; the pooled radiation necrosis rate was 6.5% (0-33%); and the pooled estimates of other major neurological complications rate was 1.5% (0-25%).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that SRS holds promise as a relatively safe treatment option for HGG. In terms of efficacy at this time, there are inadequate data to support routine utilization of SRS as the standard of care for newly diagnosed or recurrent HGG. Further studies should be pursued to define more clearly the therapeutic role of SRS.

Evaluation of pre-radiotherapy apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC): patterns of recurrence and survival outcomes analysis in patients treated for glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE

To investigate the association of pre-radiotherapy apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormalities with patterns of recurrence and outcomes in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with recurrent GBM were retrospectively evaluated. Diffusion MRI images were acquired for all patients postoperatively prior to radiotherapy. ADC images were evaluated for geographic regions of diffusion restriction (hypointensity) within the FLAIR volume. If identified, the ADC map and the T1+C MRI at the time of recurrence were registered to the original plan to determine the pattern of recurrence and the coverage of the ADC abnormality by the 60 Gy isodose line (IDL). Progression-free and overall survival was determined for patients with and without an ADC hypointensity.

RESULTS

An ADC hypointensity was identified in 32 (62%) of cases. The recurrence pattern in these cases was central in 27/32 (84%), marginal in 4/32 (13%) and distant in 1/32 (3%). The recurrence overlapped with the ADC hypointensity in 28 (88%) patients. The ADC hypointensity was covered by 95% of the 60 Gy IDL in all cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed inferior progression free survival and overall survival in patients with an ADC hypointensity compared to those without, despite similarities between the groups in terms of age, RT dose, performance status, and extent of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an ADC hypointensity on pre-radiotherapy diffusion-weighted imaging is associated with the location of tumor recurrence as demonstrated by frequent overlap in this series, and is associated with a trend toward inferior outcomes. This abnormality may reflect a high risk region of hypercellularity and warrants consideration with respect to radiotherapy planning.

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Boost with Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolamide for Glioblastoma in Good Performance Status Elderly Patients - Early Results of a Phase II Trial

Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain neoplasm with dismal prognosis. Based on successful phase III trials, 60 Gy involved-field radiotherapy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks [Standard radiation therapy (RT)] with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide is currently the standard of care. In this disease, age and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) are the most important prognostic factors. For elderly patients, clinical trials comparing standard RT with radiotherapy abbreviated to 40 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks demonstrated similar outcomes, indicating shortened radiotherapy may be an appropriate option for elderly patients. However, these trials did not include temozolomide chemotherapy, and included patients with poor KPS, possibly obscuring benefits of more aggressive treatment for some elderly patients. We conducted a prospective Phase II trial to examine the efficacy of a hypofractionated radiation course followed by a stereotactic boost with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy in elderly patients with good performance status. In this study, patients 65 years and older with a KPS > 70 and histologically confirmed GBM received 40 Gy in 15 fractions with 3D conformal technique followed by a 1–3 fraction stereotactic boost to the enhancing tumor. All patients also received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were evaluated 1 month post-treatment and every 2 months thereafter. Between 2007 and 2010, 20 patients (9 males and 11 females) were enrolled in this study. The median age was 75.4 years (range 65–87 years). At a median follow-up of 11 months (range 7–32 months), 12 patients progressed and 5 are alive. The median progression free survival was 11 months and the median overall survival was 13 months. There was no additional toxicity. These results indicate that elderly patients with good KPS can achieve outcomes comparable to the current standard of care using an abbreviated radiotherapy course, radiosurgery boost, and temozolomide.

Radiosurgery for high-grade glioma

Background:

For patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas (HGG), the current standard-of-care treatment involves surgical resection, followed by concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) and external beam radiation therapy (XRT), and subsequent TMZ chemotherapy. For patients with recurrent HGG, there is no standard of care. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used to deliver focused, relatively large doses of radiation to a small, precisely defined target. Treatment is usually delivered in a single fraction, but may be delivered in up to five fractions. The role of SRS in the management of patients with HGG is not well established.

Methods:

The PubMed database was searched with combinations of relevant MESH headings and limits. Case reports and/or small case series were excluded. Attention was focused on overall median survival as an objective measure, and data were examined separately for newly diagnosed and recurrent HGG.

Results:

With respect to newly diagnosed HGG, there is strong evidence that addition of an SRS boost prior to standard XRT provides no survival benefit. However, recent retrospective evidence suggests a possible survival benefit when SRS is performed after XRT. With respect to recurrent HGG, there is suggestion that SRS may confer a survival benefit but with potentially higher complication rates. Newer studies are investigating the combination of SRS with targeted molecular agents. Controlled prospective clinical trials using advanced imaging techniques are necessary for a complete assessment.

Conclusions:

SRS has the potential to provide a survival benefit for patients with HGG. Further research is clearly warranted to define its role in the management of newly diagnosed and recurrent HGG.

Gamma Knife, CyberKnife, TomoTherapy: gadgets or useful tools?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides information and an update on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) equipment, with a focus on intracranial lesions and brain neoplasms.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gamma Knife radiosurgery represents the gold standard for intracranial radiosurgery, using a dedicated equipment, and has recently evolved with a newly designed technology, Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion. Linear accelerator-based radiosurgery is more recent, and originally based on existing systems, either adapted or dedicated to radiosurgery. Equipment incorporating specific technologies, such as the robotic CyberKnife system, has been developed. Novel concepts in radiation therapy delivery techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, were also developed; their integration with computed tomography imaging and helical delivery has led to the TomoTherapy system. Recent data on the management of intracranial tumors with radiosurgery illustrate the trend toward a larger use and acceptance of this therapeutic modality.

SUMMARY

SRS has become an important alternative treatment for a variety of lesions. Each radiosurgery system has its advantages and limitations. The 'perfect' and ubiquitous system does not exist. The choice of a radiosurgery system may vary with the strategy and needs of specific radiosurgery programs. No center can afford to acquire every technology, and strategic choices have to be made. Institutions with large neurosurgery and radiation oncology programs usually have more than one system, allowing optimization of the management of patients with a choice of open neurosurgery, radiosurgery, and radiotherapy. Given its minimally invasive nature and increasing clinical acceptance, SRS will continue to progress and offer new advances as a therapeutic tool in neurosurgery and radiotherapy.

[Systematic review of stereotactic radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas]

The purpose of this literature systematic review was the use of stereotactic radiotherapy in glioma. Research was performed in Medline/PubMed and associated references found in published articles without publication date limit. The quality of series is variable and many biases can be evidenced. Only two randomized trials have been published using stereotactic radiotherapy for up-front treatment. There is a lack of evidence of survival advantages to use this treatment at the time of diagnosis or relapse. There is also insufficient evidence regarding the benefice/harms in the use of stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy for patients with glioma. No recommendations can be enounced. Stereotactic irradiation as boost in primary diagnosed glioma or relapsed tumour is not associated with survival improvement. For relapsed patients, treatment needs to be discussed according to the other treatment options.

An estimation of radiobiologic parameters from clinical outcomes for radiation treatment planning of brain tumor

PURPOSE

To estimate a plausible set of radiobiologic parameters such as alpha, alpha/beta values, from clinical outcomes for biologically based radiation treatment planning of brain tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Linear-quadratic (LQ) formalism and the concept of equivalent uniform dose were used to analyze a series of published clinical data for malignant gliomas involving different forms of radiation therapy.

RESULTS

A plausible set of LQ parameters was obtained for gliomas: alpha = 0.06 +/- 0.05 Gy(-1), alpha/beta = 10.0 +/- 15.1 Gy, the tumor cell doubling time T(d) = 50 +/- 30 days, with the repair half-time of 0.5 h. The present estimated biologic parameters can reasonably predict the effectiveness of most of the recently reported clinical results employing either single or combined radiation therapy modalities. Different LQ parameters between Grade 3 and Grade 4 astrocytomas were found, implying the radiosensitivity for different grade tumors may be different. Smaller alpha, beta from in vivo was observed, indicating lower radiosensitivity occurred in vivo as compared with in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

A plausible set of radiobiologic parameters for gliomas was estimated based on clinical data. These parameters can reasonably predict most of the clinical results. They may be used to design new treatment fractionation schemes and to evaluate and optimize treatment plans.

The role of radiosurgery in the management of malignant brain tumors

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides the means for creating lesions in deep-seated areas of the brain inaccessible to invasive surgery, using single high doses of focused ionizing radiation, administered using stereotactic guidance. It is a surgical technique designed to produce a specific radiobiological effect within a sharply defined target region in a single treatment session. Its technical application requires a stereotactic coordinate system, highly accurate patient repositioning (usually fixed), and multiple convergent beams of photon radiation. SRS appears to provide no benefit in the upfront treatment of newly diagnosed malignant gliomas but may be used to effectively palliate small well-demarcated volumes of recurrent disease. For selected patients with brain metastases treated with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), the addition of SRS improves median survival. In selected patients with brain metastases, it is also rational to withhold WBRT in favor of radiosurgery alone, with WBRT reserved for salvage without a decrease in median survival time.

The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based review of the role of radiosurgery for malignant glioma

PURPOSE

To systematically review the evidence for the use of stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy in adult patients with malignant glioma.

METHODS

Key clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based review were identified. Outcomes considered were overall survival, quality of life or symptom control, brain tumor control or response and toxicity. MEDLINE (1990-2004 June Week 2), CANCERLIT (1990-2003), CINAHL (1990-2004 June Week 2), EMBASE (1990-2004 Week 25), and the Cochrane library (2004 issue 2) databases were searched using OVID. In addition, the Physician Data Query clinical trials database, the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1997-2004), ASTRO (1997-2004), and the European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) (1997-2003) were searched. Data from the literature search were reviewed and tabulated. This process included an assessment of the level of evidence.

RESULTS

For patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma, radiosurgery as boost therapy with conventional external beam radiation was examined in one randomized trial, five prospective cohort studies, and seven retrospective series. There is Level I evidence that the use of radiosurgery boost followed by external beam radiotherapy and carmustine (BCNU) does not confer benefit with respect to overall survival, quality of life, or patterns of failure as compared with external beam radiotherapy and BCNU. There is Level I-III evidence of toxicity associated with radiosurgery boost as compared with external beam radiotherapy alone. The results of the prospective and retrospective studies may be influenced by selection bias. Radiosurgery used as salvage for recurrent or progressive malignant glioma after conventional external beam radiotherapy failure was reported in zero randomized trials, three prospective cohort studies, and five retrospective series. The available data are sparse and insufficient to make absolute recommendations. Stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy has been reported as boost therapy with external beam radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma in only three prospective studies. As primary therapy alone without conventional external beam radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma patients, stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy has been reported in only one prospective study. There were only three prospective series and two retrospective studies reported for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with malignant glioma, there is Level I-III evidence that the use of radiosurgery boost followed by external beam radiotherapy and BCNU does not confer benefit in terms of overall survival, local brain control, or quality of life as compared with external beam radiotherapy and BCNU. The use of radiosurgery boost is associated with increased toxicity. For patients with malignant glioma, there is insufficient evidence regarding the benefits/harms of using radiosurgery at the time progression or recurrence. There is also insufficient evidence regarding the benefits/harms in the use of stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy for patients with newly diagnosed or progressive/recurrent malignant glioma.

Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Malignant Gliomas: The University of Florida Experience

OBJECTIVE:

To review a single-institution's 12-year experience of treating malignant gliomas with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery.

METHODS:

One hundred patients were treated for malignant gliomas at the University of Florida between May 1, 1989, and June 12, 2002. Patient variables were entered into a radiosurgery database in a prospective manner. The endpoint of the study was length of survival from the time of diagnosis. The minimum length of follow-up was 18 months or until death. In an attempt to control for selection bias, we used the Radiation Oncology Therapy Group's (RTOG) recursive partitioning categories to compare survival in our group of radiosurgically boosted patients with the RTOG historical database.

RESULTS:

Recursive partitioning analysis classification was significantly associated with survival. Compared with historical controls, this cohort of patients demonstrated a decreased survival for recursive partitioning analysis Class I and II patients, similar survival for Class III and IV patients, and increased median survival for Class V patients. Other variables demonstrating a statistically significant impact on survival were eloquent location and recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION:

The results of this study and those of RTOG 93-05 suggest that the reported benefit of upfront radiosurgical boost for malignant gliomas is the result of selection bias. The possibility remains that radiosurgical boost is of benefit in recurrent tumors, especially those in RTOG Class V.

The use of hypofractionated intensity-modulated irradiation in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme: preliminary results of a prospective trial

PURPOSE

Despite major advances in treatment modalities, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains poor. Exploring hypofractionated regimens to replace the standard 6-week radiotherapy schedule is an attractive strategy as an attempt to prevent accelerated tumor cell repopulation. There is equally interest in dose escalation to the gross tumor volume where the majority of failures occur. We report our preliminary results using hypofractionated intensity-modulated accelerated radiotherapy regimen in the treatment of patients with GBM.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between July 1998 and December 2001, 25 patients with histologically proven diagnosis of GBM, Karnofsky performance status > or =60, and a postoperative tumor volume < or =110 cm3 were treated with a hypofractionated accelerated course of radiotherapy. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the contrast-enhancing lesion on the postoperative MRI T1-weighted images with the latter fused with computed tomography images for treatment planning. The planning target volume was defined as GTV + 1.5-cm margin. Using forward-planning intensity modulation (step-and-shoot technique), 60 Gy in 20 daily fractions of 3 Gy each were given to the GTV, whereas the planning target volume received a minimum of 40 Gy in 20 fractions of 2 Gy each at its periphery. Treatments were delivered over a 4-week period using 5 daily fractions per week. Dose was prescribed at the isocenter (ICRU point). Three beam angles were used in all of the cases.

RESULTS

Treatments were well tolerated. Acute toxicity was limited to increased brain edema during radiotherapy in 2 patients who were on tapering doses of corticosteroids. This was corrected by increasing the steroid dose. At a median follow-up of 8.8 months, no late toxicity was observed. One patient experienced visual loss at 9 months after completion of treatment. MRI suggested nonspecific changes to the optic chiasm. On review of the treatment plan, the total dose to the optic chiasm was confirmed to be equal to or less than 40 Gy in 20 fractions. When Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis was used, 10 patients were class III-IV, and 15 patients were class V-VI. To date, 21 patients have had clinical and/or radiologic evidence of disease progression, and 16 patients have died. The median survival was 9.5 months (range: 2.8-22.9 months), the 1-year survival rate was 40%, and the median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (range: 1.9-12.8 months).

CONCLUSION

This hypofractionated accelerated irradiation schedule using forward planning (step-and-shoot) hypofractionated, intensity-modulated accelerated radiotherapy is feasible and seems to be a safe treatment for patients with GBM. A 2-week reduction in the treatment time may be of valuable benefit for this group of patients. However, despite this accelerated regimen, no survival advantage has been observed.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy boost after post-operative radiotherapy in patients with high-grade gliomas

PURPOSE

To determine the value and the toxicity of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost as used in the joint randomized EORTC-22972/MRC-BR10 study in patients with malignant gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients (11 male, six female) with a high-grade glioma (two WHO III, 15 WHO IV) < or =4 cm in maximum diameter, with a good performance status (WHO > or =2), were treated with a fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) boost to 20 Gy in four fractions following partial brain irradiation to a dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. This patient group was compared with historical data in a matched-pair analysis.

RESULTS

All patients were treated by conventional radiotherapy and a SRT boost (15 patients received 20 Gy and two patients 10 Gy). Acute side effects included fatigue (two), impairment of short-term memory (one) and worsening of pre-existing symptoms (one). No patient developed steroid dependence after SRT. One patient was re-operated for radiation necrosis. At a median follow-up of 25 months (9-50 months) 14 patients recurred locally. Survival was 77% at 1 year and 42% at 2 years; progression-free survival was 70% at 1 year and 35% at 2 years for all patients, respectively. Median survival for the whole patient group is 20 months. Comparison with a matched historical group showed a significantly better survival for the group treated with a stereotactic boost (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A fractionated stereotactic boost after standard external beam radiotherapy in selected patients with high-grade glioma is feasible and well tolerated with low toxicity. Compared to historical data survival is significantly better with an additional SRT boost. However, its effectiveness has to be proven in a randomized trial.

Radiological response and histological changes in malignant astrocytic tumors after stereotactic radiosurgery

Stereotactic radiosurgery is an encouraging approach to deliver higher doses of radiation boost for malignant gliomas safely and precisely. The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiation response and histological changes of malignant astrocytic tumors after stereotactic linac radiosurgery (SLRS). We studied an autopsy case of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and two surgical cases with gross total removal of recurrent GBM and anaplastic astrocytoma transformed from fibrillary astrocytoma treated with SLRS. Destructive changes, such as the disappearance of viable cells, coagulation necrosis, and fibrinoid degeneration of vascular walls, were observed in the center of the target of SLRS, which showed histologically similar radiobiological reactions to well-known delayed central nervous system radiation necrosis caused by conventional radiotherapy. The region showing such radiation necrosis was within the area irradiated with approximately 15-20Gy or more by SLRS; however, dense viable tumor cells remained in the periphery that was irradiated with less than 15Gy. In a comparative immunohistochemical study of the tumors before and after SLRS, neither MIB-1 and p53 labeling indices nor immunoreactivity for GFAP represented any persistent tendencies. There were very few TUNEL-positive cells in either tumor before and after SLRS. These results showed that radiosurgery for malignant gliomas leads to earlier radiation necrosis than conventional radiation and that it is useful in eradicating tumor cells in the center of the target. However, some viable tumor cells may remain in the periphery irradiated with an insufficient dose for cell death and may be partly transformed in character by DNA damage due to radiation. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was suggested to characterize the radiation response in radiosurgery tumor targets for correlation with histological findings.

Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of intracranial gliomas

Glial neoplasms are the most common primary intracranial malignancies. Treatment of high-grade gliomas has been frustrating, with less than 5% of patients surviving 5 years after a diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated strereotactic radiotherapy (F-SRT) provide means to either escalate the dose in primary treatment or to palliate recurrences. Because of their lower alpha/beta ratios and more focal nature, low-grade gliomas (LGG) are more attractive targets for stereotactically focused radiation. Results of available phase I-II data are reviewed for both low and high-grade gliomas. In the case of high-grade gliomas disappointing preliminary phase III data from RTOG 93-05 are discussed. Toxicity of SRS is discussed. Acute treatment toxicity of significance is unusual and generally self-limited. Occasionally an exacerbation of existing symptoms occurs. Late complications attributable to SRS are usually defined as necrosis within the treatment volume. The rate of necrosis can be hard to define in high-grade gliomas as tumor cells are often present in surgical specimens. New strategies in the application of stereotactic radiation are touched upon, these include: changes in planning and fractionation, concurrent use of chemotherapy, use of radiation modifiers and biologic agents. After reviewing the current data for high-grade gliomas, it appears that any apparent improvement in outcome seen in phase I-II trials is attributable to patient selection. The best evidence available does not support the use of SRS for primary high-grade gliomas. The somewhat limited experience in LGG also indicates a lack of benefit for patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery or F-SRT. For a very select group of patients with small recurrent lesions, F-SRT may represent a safe, reasonable treatment.

Radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma in adults: a systematic review

PURPOSE

A systematic review was conducted to develop guidelines for radiotherapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Library, and relevant conference proceedings were searched to identify randomized trials and meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Pooling of six randomized trials detected a significant survival benefit favouring post-operative radiotherapy compared with no radiotherapy (risk ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.88, P<0.00001). Two randomized trials demonstrated no significant difference in survival rates for whole brain radiation versus more local fields that encompass the enhancing primary plus a 2 cm margin. A randomized trial detected a small improvement in survival with 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 45 Gy in 20 fractions. Radiation dose intensification and radiation sensitizer approaches have not demonstrated superior survival rates compared with conventionally fractionated doses of 50-60 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative external beam radiotherapy is recommended as standard therapy for patients with malignant glioma. The high-dose volume should incorporate the enhancing tumour plus a limited margin (e.g. 2 cm) for the planning target volume, and the total dose delivered should be in the range of 50-60 Gy in fraction sizes of 1.8-2.0 Gy. Radiation dose intensification and radiation sensitizer approaches are not recommended as standard care. For patients older than age 70, preliminary data suggest that the same survival benefit can be achieved with less morbidity using a shorter course of radiotherapy. Supportive care alone is a reasonable therapeutic option in patients older than age 70 with a poor performance status.

Radiosurgical boost for primary high-grade gliomas

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the survival of patients with high-grade gliomas treated with external beam radiotherapy with or without radiosurgical boost. From July 1993 to April 1998, 32 patients were selected, 15 of which received radiosurgery. Inclusion criteria were age > 18 years, histological confirmation of high-grade glioma, primary tumor treatment with curative intent, unifocal tumor and supratentorial location. All patients were found to be in classes III-VI, according to the recursive partitioning analysis proposed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. The median interval between radiotherapy and radiosurgery was 5 weeks (range 1-13). Treatment volumes ranged from 2.9 to 70.3 cc (median 15.0 cc). Prescribed radiosurgery doses varied from 8.0 to 12.5 Gy (median 10.0 Gy). Radiosurgery and control groups were well balanced with respect to prognostic factor distributions. Median actuarial survival time in radiosurgery and control groups was 21.4 months and 11.6 months, respectively (p = 0.0254). Among patients with KPS > 80, median survival time was 11.0 months and 53.9 months in the control and radiosurgery groups, respectively (p = 0.0103). Radiosurgery was the single factor correlated with survival on Cox model analysis (p = 0.0362) and was associated with a 2.76 relative reduction in the risk of cancer death (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-7.13). Our results suggest that radiosurgery may confer a survival advantage for patients in RPA classes III-VI, especially for those with Karnofsky performance status >80. The definitive role of radiosurgical boost for patients with high-grade gliomas awaits the results of randomized trials.

The radiation oncologist's perspective on stereotactic radiosurgery

Unfavorable gliomas: The basis for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is largely historical in nature and rooted in conventional thinking. This is derived from the original use of SRS in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), where the benefit of single-fraction high-dose radiation is clearly optimal in terms of addressing AVM obliteration kinetics. However, tumor cell kinetics are not the same as AVM obliteration kinetics and therefore may not be optimally addressed by single-fraction SRS. In addition, fractionated (F) SRS, as compared to single-fraction SRS, should allow for sparing of normal tissue damage. The relatively noninvasive nature of SRS allows for the potential of exploiting the use of FSRS and also allows for consideration of delivering FSRS in a split-course fashion. This provides an additional advantage over what can normally be achieved by use of stereotactic brachytherapy, in that sterotactic brachytherapy is likely to be performed only once in the course of a patient's primary treatment. This strategy exploits tumor and/or normal tissue cell kinetics, inclusive of attempting to counteract the initial accelerated tumor growth phase pre-CEBRT(conventional external beam radiation therapy), thereby decreasing the rate of clinical tumor progression during CEBRT. This split-course design should also help to counteract the effect of accelerated tumor repopulation post-CEBRT. Our unique experience with this approach in patients with unfavorable gliomas will be reviewed. Brain metastases: While whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) remains a standard of care in patients with brain metastases, is potential neurocognitive morbidity remains a poorly understood concern. Despite this, and with an increasing role of surgery and/or SRS in the primary management of patients with brain metastasis, recently reported experiences withholding WBRT as part of primary therapy for brain metastases have not analyzed the potential effects on neurological functional status and/or neurocognition associated with the increased risk of brain tumor recurrence seen with such a strategy. We recently evaluated the risk of symptomatic brain tumor recurrence and associated neurologic deficit in 36 patients treated for newly diagnosed unresected brain metastases treated by Gamma Knife SRS alone followed by planned observation. Among the 17 patients (47%) developing brain tumor recurrence, 71% (12/17) were symptomatic and 59% (10/17) had an associated neurologic deficit. Also of interest, the author (WFR) performed a secondary analysis of a randomized phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation (AH) versus standard accelerated fractionation (AF) in patients with unresected brain metastases. Control of brain metastases had a significant impact on MMSE. It is only among patients with 'uncontrolled" brain metastases that a drop in MMSE score is seen. Details of these studies, along with others, will be reviewed and implications with regards to the complementary role of WBRT in patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases will be discussed.

Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with glioblastoma multiforme

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This retrospective review evaluates the impact of SRS delivered on a gamma knife (GK) unit as an adjuvant therapy in the management of patients with GBM.

METHODS

Between August 1993 and December 1998, 82 patients with pathologically confirmed GBM received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Of these 82 patients, 64 with a minimum follow-up duration of at least 1 month are the focus of this analysis. Of the 64 assessable patients, 33 patients were treated with EBRT alone (Group 1), and 31 patients received both EBRT plus a GK-SRS boost (Group 2). GK-SRS was administered to most patients within 6 weeks of the completion of EBRT. The median EBRT dose was 59.7 Gy (range, 28-070.2 Gy), and the median GK-SRS dose to the prescription volume was 17.1 Gy (range, 10-28 Gy). The median age of the study population was 50.4 years, and the median pretreatment Karnofsky performance status was 80. Patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related variables were analyzed by Cox regression analysis, and survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit.

RESULTS

Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 16 months, and the actuarial survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years were 67, 40, and 26%, respectively. When comparing age, Karnofsky performance status, extent of resection, and tumor volume, no statistical differences where discovered between Group 1 versus Group 2. When comparing the overall survival of Group 1 versus Group 2, the median survival was 13 months versus 25 months, respectively (P = 0.034). Age, Karnofsky performance status, and the addition of GK-SRS were all found to be significant predictors of overall survival via Cox regression analysis. No acute Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicity was encountered.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a GK-SRS boost in conjunction with surgery and EBRT significantly improved the overall survival time in this retrospective series of patients with GBM. A prospective, randomized validation of the benefit of SRS awaits the results of the recently completed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group's trial RTOG 93-05.

Combined stereotactic split-course fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery and conventional radiation therapy for unfavorable gliomas: a phase I study

Object. This investigation was performed to determine the tolerance and toxicities of split-course fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery (FSRS) given in combination with conventional external-beam radiation therapy (CEBRT).

Methods. Eighteen patients with previously unirradiated, gliomas treated between March 1995 and January 2000 form the substrate of this report. These included 11 patients with malignant gliomas, six with low-grade gliomas, and one with a recurrent glioma. They were stratified into three groups according to tumor volume (TV). Fifteen were treated using the initial FSRS dose schedule and form the subject of this report. Group A (four patients), had TV of 5 cm3 or less (7 Gy twice pre- and twice post-CEBRT); Group B (six patients), TV greater than 5 cm3 but less than or equal to 15 cm3 (7 Gy twice pre-CEBRT and once post-CEBRT); and Group C (five patients), TV greater than 15 cm3 but less than or equal to 30 cm3 (7 Gy once pre- and once post-CEBRT). All patients received CEBRT to 59.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions. Dose escalation was planned, provided the level of toxicity was acceptable. All patients were able to complete CEBRT without interruption or experiencing disease progression. Unacceptable toxicity was observed in two Grade 4/Group B patients and two Grade 4/Group C patients. Eight patients required reoperation. In three (38%) there was necrosis without evidence of tumor. Neuroimaging studies were available for evaluation in 14 patients. Two had a partial (≥ 50%) reduction in volume and nine had a minor (> 20%) reduction in size. The median follow-up period was 15 months (range 9–60 months). Six patients remained alive for 3 to 60 months.

Conclusions. The imaging responses and the ability of these patients with intracranial gliomas to complete therapy without interruption or experiencing disease progression is encouraging. Excessive toxicity derived from combined FSRS and CEBRT treatment, as evaluated thus far in this study, was seen in patients with Group B and C lesions at the 7-Gy dose level. Evaluation of this novel treatment strategy with dose modification is ongoing.

Preliminary report of a phase I study of combined fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and conventional external beam radiation therapy for unfavorable gliomas

PURPOSE

To determine the tolerance and toxicities of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) given in combination with conventional external beam radiation therapy (CEBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 1995 to September 1998, 14 patients with previously unirradiated and unfavorable glioma (malignant glioma, n = 8; unfavorable low-grade glioma, n = 5; and recurrent glioma, n = 1) were stratified into 3 groups according to tumor volume (TV) to determine the initial FSRS dose schedule: Group A (n = 3): TV </= 5 cc (7 Gy x 2 pre- and post-CEBRT]; Group B (n = 6): 5 cc < TV </= 15 cc [7 Gy x 2 pre- and 7 Gy x 1 post-CEBRT]; and Group C (n = 5): 15 cc < TV </= 30 cc (7 Gy x 1 pre- and post-CEBRT). All patients received CEBRT to 59.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction. Dose escalation was planned, if toxicity was acceptable.

RESULTS

All patients were able to complete CEBRT without interruption or experiencing disease progression. Unacceptable toxicity has been limited to patients in groups B (grade 4, n = 2/6) and C (grade 4, n = 2/5). Eight patients required reoperation, with 3 (38%) having necrosis without evidence of tumor. Eleven patients (79%) have had objective partial (>/=50% reduction, n = 2) or minor (>20% reduction, n = 9) imaging response. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 51 months (median 15 months), with 7 patients alive at 22-51 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging response and the ability of these patients with unfavorable intracranial gliomas to complete therapy without interruption or experiencing disease progression is very encouraging. Excessive toxicity of combined FSRS and CEBRT as evaluated thus far in this study was seen for patients with group B/C lesions. Evaluation of this novel treatment strategy with dose modification is ongoing.

Treatment of patients with primary glioblastoma multiforme with standard postoperative radiotherapy and radiosurgical boost: prognostic factors and long-term outcome

OBJECT

To assess the value of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as adjunct therapy in patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the authors analyzed their experience with 78 patients.

METHODS

Between June 1988 and January 1995, 78 patients underwent SRS as part of their initial treatment for GBM. All patients had undergone initial surgery or biopsy confirming the diagnosis of GBM and received conventional external beam radiotherapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery was performed using a dedicated 6-MV stereotactic linear accelerator. Thirteen patients were alive at the time of analysis with a median follow-up period of 40.8 months. The median length of actuarial survival for all patients was 19.9 months. Twelve- and 24-month survival rates were 88.5% and 35.9%, respectively. Patient age and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) class were significant prognostic indicators according to univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Twenty-three patients aged younger than 40 years had a median survival time of 48.6 months compared with 55 older patients who had 18.2 months (p < 0.001). Patients in this series fell into RTOG Classes III (27 patients), IV (29 patients), or V (22 patients). Class III patients had a median survival time of 29.5 months following diagnosis; this was significantly longer than median survival times for Classes IV and V, which were 19.2 and 18.2 months, respectively (p = 0.001). Only patient age (< 40 years) was a significant prognostic factor according to multivariate analysis. Acute complications were unusual and limited to exacerbation of existing symptoms. There were no new neuropathies secondary to SRS. Thirty-nine patients (50%) underwent reoperation for symptomatic necrosis or recurrent tumor. The rate of reoperation at 24 months following SRS was 54.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a radiosurgery boost appears to confer a survival advantage to selected patients.

Accelerated radiotherapy regimen for malignant gliomas using stereotactic concomitant boosts for dose escalation

The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility and toxicities of an accelerated treatment program by using a concomitant stereotactic radiotherapy boost given weekly during a course of standard external-beam irradiation (EBXRT) in patients with malignant gliomas. Twelve patients underwent biopsy or subtotal resection of a malignant glioma and were enrolled on the protocol, which delivered 44 Gy-EBXRT and a 12-Gy stereotactic radiotherapy boost given on 3 consecutive weeks of treatment for a total dose of 80 Gy over 33 days. Three patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and nine patients with glioblastoma multiforme had median survival times of 33 months and 16 months, respectively. All of the tumor recurrences were within or were closely adjacent to the region of high-dose irradiation. None of the patients required a treatment break, and there were no acute complications. Two patients developed seizures in the follow-up period, and four patients were diagnosed with radionecrosis at the time of the second operation. The treatment program was found to be feasible and was well tolerated, and it resulted in a rate of late complications similar to those of radiosurgery or interstitial brachytherapy.

[Contrast-enhanced MR "magnetization transfer technique". Improved tumor contrast, delineation and visibility of intracranial malignant gliomas and metastases in radiosurgical treatment planning]

AIMS

To improve tumor conspicuity and delineation on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images with and without magnetization transfer (MT) contrast as a strategy to improve the macroscopic boost volume definition in the planning process of radiosurgery in patients with high grade gliomas or metastatic brain lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients (mean age 47 years) with histologically proven or suspected high grade glioma (n = 12) or metastatic brain lesions (n = 20) were prospectively examined by MR imaging. After the administration of gadolinium dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) the lesions were imaged with a T1-weighted MT-fast low angle shot (FLASH) pulse sequence and with a conventional T1-weighted SE sequence without MT saturation.

RESULTS

The mean CNR of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted MT-FLASH was 15 +/- 5 compared to 11 +/- 4 on SE images, representing a significant (p < .01) improvement. The mean tumor diameter of malignant gliomas was significantly (p < .01) larger measured on T1-weighted MT-FLASH images compared to those obtained from T1-weighted SE images and were comparable for metastatic lesions. Lesion conspicuity and delineation were improved in 50% of patients with high grade gliomas and in 35% of patients with brain metastases. Lesion conspicuity was markedly improved in the posterior fossa. Additional contrast enhancing lesions were detected in 10% of patients with metastases on MT-FLASH images.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that contrast-enhanced MT-FLASH images may improve lesion detection and delineation in the planning process of radiosurgery in patients with intracranial high grade gliomas or metastases or even alter the treatment approach.

Contrast-enhanced magnetization transfer imaging: improvement of brain tumor conspicuity and delineation for radiosurgical target volume definition

PURPOSE

To assess the contrast-noise-ratio (CNR), and thus tumor conspicuity and delineation, on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetization transfer (MT) images compared to conventional T1-weighted spin echo (SE) images as a strategy to improve definition of the macroscopic boost volume in radiosurgery treatment planning in patients with high grade gliomas or metastatic brain lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients (mean age, 51 years) with histologically proven or suspected high grade glioma or cerebral metastases were prospectively examined by MR imaging. Following gadolinium dimeglumine administration (0.1 mmol/kg body weight) the brain was imaged with both a T1-weighted MT-fast low angle shot (FLASH) pulse sequence and with a conventional T1-weighted SE sequence without MT saturation. Lesion conspicuity, size and CNR were compared for both techniques.

RESULTS

The mean tumor diameter of malignant gliomas was significantly (P < 0.01) larger when measured on T1-weighted MT-FLASH images compared to T1-weighted SE images and was comparable for metastatic lesions. The mean CNR of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted MT-FLASH was 14 +/- 5 compared to 10 +/- 4 on SE images, representing a significant (P < 0.05) improvement. Lesion conspicuity and delineation was improved in 10 of 20 patients (50%) with high grade gliomas and in 15 of 30 patients (50%) with metastases. Additional contrast enhancing lesions were detected in 8 of 30 patients (27%) with metastases on MT-FLASH images. Lesion conspicuity was markedly improved in the posterior fossa.

DISCUSSION

Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MT-FLASH images improve lesion detection and delineation in the planning process of radiosurgery in patients with intracranial high grade gliomas or metastases and may even alter the treatment approach.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with cis-platinum radiosensitization in the treatment of recurrent, progressive, or persistent malignant astrocytoma

External beam irradiation of malignant astrocytoma often provides temporary local tumor control, but dose is limited by potential toxicity to normal brain. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) provides additional radiation to the tumor with less dose deposition in adjacent normal brain. We administered a potential radiosensitizer, cis-platinum (CDDP), to optimize the therapeutic index. CDDP (40 mg/m2) was given weekly, with SRT once or twice weekly, to 20 patients. One had a partial response, 11 stable disease, and eight progressed despite therapy. Acute toxicities were manageable. Five patients required surgery for tumor progression or radiation necrosis. Median response duration was 18.5 weeks and median survival was 55 weeks. SRT combined with CDDP is safe, with durable responses in some patients. Further investigations to determine optimal SRT and CDDP doses and scheduling are justified.

Gamma knife for glioma: selection factors and survival

PURPOSE

To determine factors associated with survival differences in patients treated with radiosurgery for glioma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed 189 patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery for primary or recurrent glioma World Health Organization (WHO) Grades 1-4.

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

The median minimum tumor dose was 16 Gy (8-30 Gy) and the median tumor volume was 5.9 cc (1.3-52 cc). Brachytherapy selection criteria were satisfied in 65% of patients. Median follow-up of all surviving patients was 65 weeks after radiosurgery. For primary glioblastoma patients, median survival from the date of pathologic diagnosis was 86 weeks if brachytherapy criteria were satisfied and 40 weeks if they were not (p = 0.01), indicating that selection factors strongly influence survival. Multivariate analysis showed that increased survival was associated with five variables: lower pathologic grade, younger age, increased Karnofsky performance status (KPS), smaller tumor volume, and unifocal tumor. Survival was not found to be significantly related to radiosurgical technical parameters (dose, number of isocenters, prescription isodose percent, inhomogeneity) or extent of preradiosurgery surgery. We developed a hazard ratio model that is independent of the technical details of radiosurgery and applied it to reported radiosurgery and brachytherapy series, demonstrating a significant correlation between survival and hazard ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after radiosurgery for glioma is strongly related to five selection variables. Much of the variation in survival reported in previous series can be attributed to differences in distributions of these variables. These variables should be considered in selecting patients for radiosurgery and in the design of future studies.

Accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for malignant gliomas

PURPOSE

To evaluate accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of malignant gliomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between April 1985 and June 1994, 70 adult patients with pathologically confirmed malignant glioma (75% glioblastoma multiforme, 25% anaplastic astrocytoma) suitable for high-dose therapy were selected for treatment with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy, 1.5 Gy twice daily to a total target dose of 60 Gy. Two patients were excluded from analysis (one patient had a fatal pulmonary embolism after 18 Gy; one patient discontinued therapy after 28.5 Gy against medical advice and without sequelae or progression). The 68 patients in the study group had a median age of 52 years and a median Karnofsky performance status of 90. Stereotactic implant (125I) or stereotactic radiosurgery boosts were delivered to 16 patients (24%) in the study group. Minimum follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

Median survival was 13.8 months and median progression-free survival was 7.4 months. The absolute Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 16% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. Multivariate analysis for the prognostic impact of age, gender, histology, Karnofsky performance status, symptomatology, surgical resection vs. biopsy, and boost vs. nonboost therapy revealed that Karnofsky performance status > or = 90, boost therapy, and surgical excision predicted significantly improved outcome. No severe toxicity occurred in patients treated with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy alone, although 5% required steroids temporarily for edema. Progression occurred during treatment in one patient (1.5%).

CONCLUSION

This regimen of accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy is well tolerated and leads to results comparable with those of standard therapy. The rate of disease progression during treatment is significantly better (p = 0.001) than is reported for patients treated with standard fractionation, with or without chemotherapy. This regimen is a reasonable starting point for future trials and may have some advantages over standard fractionation.

The lazaroid U74389G protects normal brain from stereotactic radiosurgery-induced radiation injury

PURPOSE

To test an established model of stereotactic radiosurgery-induced radiation injury with pretreatments of either methylprednisolone or the lazaroid U74389G.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine cats received stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator using and animal radiosurgery device. Each received a dose of 125.0 Gy prescribed to the 84% isodose shell to the anterior limb of the right internal capsule. One animal received no pretreatment, two received citrate vehicle, three received 30 mg/kg of methylprednisolone, and three received 5 mg/kg of U74389G. After irradiation, the animals had frequent neurologic examinations, and neurologic deficits developed in all of them. Six months after the radiation treatment, the animals were anesthetized, and had gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) scans, followed by Evans blue dye perfusion, euthanasia, and brain fixation.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance scans revealed a decrease in the size of the lesions from a mean volume of 0.45 +/- 0.06 cm(3) in the control, vehicle-treated, and methylpredniosolone-treated animals to 0.22 +/- 0.14 cm(3) in the U74389G-treated group. The scans also suggested the absence of necrosis and ventricular dilatation in the lazaroid-treated group. Gross pathology revealed that lesions produced in the untreated, vehicle-treated, and methylprednisolone-treated cats were similar and were characterized by a peripheral zone of Evans blue dye staining with a central zone of a mature coagulative necrosis and focal hemorrhage. However, in the U74389G-treated animals, the lesions were found to have an area of Evans blue dye staining, but lacked discrete areas of necrosis and hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that the lazaroid U74389G protects the normal brain from radiation injury produced by stereotactic radiosurgery.

Macroscopic tumor volume of malignant glioma determined by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with and without magnetization transfer contrast

The purposes of this study were to compare the conspicuity and lesion volume of contrast-enhancing macroscopic malignant glioma determined by postcontrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with and without magnetization transfer (MT) saturation, and to discuss possible implications for radiotherapy planning. Nineteen patients (age 24-60 years) with histologically proven malignant glioma were prospectively examined by MR imaging. After the administration of gadolinium dimeglumine (0.1 mmol/kg body weight), the lesions were imaged with an MT-weighted FLASH (fast, low-angle shot) pulse sequence and with a conventional T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) sequence without MT saturation. The mean tumor volumes of gliomas measured on MT-weighted FLASH images were significantly (p < .01) larger than those obtained from T1-weighted SE images (45 +/- 15 cm3 vs. 33 +/- 10 cm3). The mean contrast-to-noise ratio of enhancing lesions on MT-weighted FLASH was 48 +/- 14 compared with 30 +/- 14 on SE images, representing a significant (p < .01) improvement. We conclude that the volume of contrast enhancement of malignant glioma identified on MT-weighted FLASH images represents the area of disrupted blood-brain barrier. If this volume of subtle contrast enhancement is caused by tumor infiltration and represents the boost target volume for stereotactic radiosurgery or brachytherapy, MT-weighted FLASH images would be better than T1-weighted SE images to define these volumes. These improved delineation of areas at highest risk for recurrence following radiation therapy should enhance the efficacy of treatment planning for high-boost therapy.

Radiosurgery in the initial management of malignant gliomas: survival comparison with the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery on the survival of patients treated with malignant gliomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 115 patients from three institutions (75 from the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, 30 from the University of Wisconsin, and 10 from the University of Florida) were treated with a combination of surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and linac-based radiosurgery as part of similar institutional protocols from March 1988 through July 1993. Patients were stratified into six prognostic classes (classes 1-6) based on the recursive partitioning analysis of multiple prognostic factors previously reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

RESULTS

The actuarial 2-year and median survival for all patients analyzed was 45% and 96 weeks, respectively. In comparison to the results from a previously published analysis of 1578 patients entered on three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group external beam radiotherapy protocols from 1974 to 1989, those patients treated with radiosurgery had a significantly improved 2-year and median survival (p = 0.01) corresponding with a standardized mortality risk ratio of 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 0.85]. This improvement in survival was seen predominantly for the worse prognostic classes (classes 3-6). The 2-year survival for the radiosurgical patients compared with the previously reported patients was 81% vs. 76% for classes 1/2, 75% vs. 35% for class 3, 34% vs. 15% for class 4, and 21% vs. 6% for classes 5/6, respectively. Although Karnofsky performance status and prognostic class were significant on univariate analysis, only the Karnofsky score was a significant predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis. Median and 2-year survival for patients with a Karnofsky score > or = 70 was 106 weeks and 51%, respectively, as compared to 38 weeks and 0% for patients with a Karnofsky score < 70% (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of radiosurgery to conventional treatment (surgery and external beam radiotherapy) of malignant gliomas appears to improve survival when compared to historical reports. These results should be interpreted with caution because the recursive partitioning model does not completely predict the prognosis of the patients treated in the present study. Although this study suggests that radiosurgery may prolong survival in patients with malignant gliomas, the role of radiosurgery in the management of these patients remains to be defined by a prospective randomized trial.