Oropharyngeal cancer in the elderly

Assessing a Suitable Radiotherapy Utilisation Benchmark for Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

AIMS

To (i) determine the actual radiotherapy utilization (RTU) stratified by age, (ii) develop an age- and co-morbidity adjusted optimal RTU model and (iii) examine the tolerance and toxicity of treatment of older patients with head and neck cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study based on New South Wales Cancer Registry records (2010-2014) linked to radiotherapy data (2010-2015) and admitted patient data (2008-2015) for patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer. We calculated the actual RTU, defined as the proportion of patients who received at least one course of radiotherapy within a year of diagnosis, by age group, including patients aged 80+ years. We also calculated the age and comorbidity-adjusted optimal RTU. For treatment tolerance, the radiotherapy dose for each age group and the completion rate for a seven week 70 Gray (Gy) course of curative intent radiotherapy were computed. The number of emergency department (ED) presentations were used as a surrogate measure of acute treatment toxicity for patients receiving 70 Gy.

RESULTS

Of the 5966 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer, 814 (13.6%) were aged 80+ years. For all age groups, the actual RTU was less than the optimal RTU. The age- and comorbidity-adjusted optimal RTU for patients aged 80+ was 52% (95% CI: 51%-53%), and the actual RTU was 40% (95% CI: 37%-44%). Only 4.4% of patients aged 80+ received 70 Gy, and the completion rate for a 70 Gy course of radiotherapy for these patients was 92%. The ED presentation rate was similar for all age groups.

CONCLUSION

The actual RTU was less in the 80+ years patients and across all age groups. Fewer patients in the 80+ group received curative intent schedules compared to the actual RTU rate for younger age groups, despite similar rates of completion of curative intent radiotherapy and acute toxicity.

Age-specific incidence and treatment patterns of head and neck cancer in the Netherlands-A cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the incidence and treatment pattern of head and neck cancer in different age groups.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Netherlands Cancer Registry.

PARTICIPANTS

All new primary head and neck cancer cases diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 were included and categorised into different age groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Tumour site, stage, treatment modality, location of diagnosis and treatment.

RESULTS

The study population was composed of 11 558 tumours. Oral cancer was the most common primary site (31%), followed by laryngeal (25%) and oropharyngeal cancer (22%). Ninety-six per cent of the entire study population was diagnosed and/or treated in a certified head and neck oncology centre which was lower in the 80+ population (92%). Multimodality treatment was less frequently applied with increasing age (eg oral cavity: 17% in 80+ vs 34% in 60-; P < .001). The percentage of patients not receiving tumour-directed treatment increased with age (eg oropharyngeal cancer: 25% in 80+ vs 6% in 80-; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that less multimodal and tumour-directed treatment is applied with the increasing age of head and neck cancer patients.

A specific approach for elderly patients with head and neck cancer

Approximately 10% of head and neck (HN) tumors occur in patients aged more than or equal to 80 years. In this population, the main challenge for physicians is to deal with the benefit/risk ratio of treatments and tumor-related symptoms. As elderly patients are generally excluded from clinical trials, there is a lack of evidence-based data with regard to the most appropriate multidisciplinary management. The prevalence of frailty and the pattern of comorbidities in this specific population are still unknown. The management of these tumors in a geriatric context is complex due to the high risk of toxicity of locoregional treatments. Thus, physicians often have to adapt to the treatment schedule to decrease potential adverse effects even with a risk of undertreatment. A retrospective series reported that the treatment delivered to elderly patients presenting with HN tumor complies with an institution's policy in less than 50% of cases, emphasizing the need to assess the outcome of personalized/adapted treatment in geriatric patients. The major issue is to determine which adaptation could be carried out, and then, what could be the respective individual benefit/risk ratio of each adaptation. In this review, we will focus on the locoregional management of elderly patients, and develop the issue of adapted local treatment. We will discuss the feasibility of adapted surgery and radiotherapy and provide current evidence-based data that may allow physicians involved in locoregional treatment of elderly patients with HN cancers to be acquainted with practical guidelines. Then, we will highlight the importance of nutritional support in this population in which the prevalence of malnutrition is high.

Radiation therapy in the elderly: more side effects and complications?

Aging is associated with physiological changes and comorbid illnesses, which may affect an individual's tolerance to radiation. There is the belief that a relationship exists between age and radiation toxicity and therefore non-curative schemes are offered to older patients. Preclinical studies show that normal tissue radiation-induced toxicity differs little with age. In the clinical setting, retrospective and some prospective studies have reported that elderly patients treated with radical radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, who do not have comorbidities and retain a good performance status, show a benefit in treatment outcomes. However, an increase in acute effects or a lowered functional tolerance has also been reported. To select candidates for radical treatments, a specific geriatric assessment should be used to stratify elderly patients as a function of the physiological status. Only specifically designed prospective studies can define the role of radiation treatment in elderly patients with different physiological status.

Recent changes in the treatment of patients with advanced laryngeal cancer

Since the original data from the Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group demonstrated that nonsurgical therapy could achieve survival rates comparable to total laryngectomy in selected cases, there has been a progressive increase in employment of nonsurgical therapy for the management of advanced laryngeal cancer. Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conventionally fractionated or hyperfractioned radiotherapy for chemotherapy responders, or simultaneously administered chemoradiation has resulted in a significant number of patients who achieved cure while preserving their larynges. Nevertheless, combined chemotherapy and external beam radiation is associated with a variety of acute and chronic sequelae that can have a debilitating impact on function and quality of life. Although no therapeutic option is without risk, the decision regarding the modality of therapy for a patient with advanced laryngeal cancer should prompt a careful review of the current surgical techniques available for treatment. Data on quality of life and aging, as well as advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, are available today that were not available at the time of the Veterans study. Selection of optimal therapy is often complex and raises the question whether the pendulum may have swung too far in the direction of nonsurgical therapy for advanced laryngeal cancer. This article reviews the current options available for a patient with advanced laryngeal cancer and discusses the impact of therapy.

Clinical and biological factors affecting response to radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer: a review

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this article was to review the clinical and biological factors that have been shown to influence the response of the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to primary radiotherapy and briefly discuss how some of these factors could be exploited to improve outcome.

DESIGN

Medline based search covering 1982-2006 to identify the HNSCC literature where the effect of clinical and biological factors on locoregional control and overall survival were investigated.

RESULTS

Clinical factors are routinely used in management decisions. Nevertheless, identically staged tumours receiving the same treatment may have different outcomes. Biological factors such as hypoxia, proliferation and radio-sensitivity play an important role in radiation response. However, these are not currently used in practise because tests that are clinically reliable and feasible are not available.

CONCLUSION

High-quality translational research will allow us to develop biological tests that can be used in routine clinical practise to tailor individual treatment, with the ability to improve patient outcome further by modifying the underlying tumour biology.

Radiation therapy in the elderly

The purpose of this review is to highlight aspects of radiation oncology specifically related to aging and caring for the older patient with cancer. Particular emphasis is placed on the preclinical and clinical studies focusing on the efficacy and toxicity of RT in this population. Special techniques are also reviewed that have particular relevance to the treatment of the elderly.

3D conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer in elderly patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate if conformal radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with doses of 70 Gy is well tolerated in patients aged 75 years or older, and if the side effects and the biochemical recurrence free (bNED) survival are comparable to younger patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty patients>or=75 years received definitive conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Acute and late side effects as well as bNED survival (ASTRO criteria) were compared to 221 patients younger than 75 years who were treated during the same period of time.

RESULTS

Median dose to the prostate was 70 Gy in both groups. There were no significant differences in acute or late side effects between age groups. The frequency of grade III late symptoms was low and ranged between 0 and 4% for the evaluated symptoms irrespective of age group. Older patients had a better bNED survival than younger patients (bNED survival at 4 years: 76 vs. 61%, P=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer is well tolerated in patients aged 75 years or older. In terms of bNED survival radiation treatment is at least as effective as it is for younger patients.

The opinion of general practitioners on the treatment of prostate and breast cancer in elderly people: results of a survey based on clinical models

AIMS

Several publications have reported age-related differences in the management of people with cancer. Most data have been derived retrospectively from hospital or cancer-centre databases. The aim of the present study was to identify major decisional factors observed in general practitioner (GP) practices, outside the hospital setting, regarding the clinical management of patients with prostate and breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During three national GP meetings in Belgium, questionnaires presenting two simulated patient cases were presented to GPs who were asked two questions: one regarding further staging and referral of the case and the second regarding the treatment of the case. A total of 678 questionnaires were distributed. GPs received two randomly selected cases each: a breast cancer history and a prostate cancer history. Three variables were assessed simultaneously: age, performance status and medical history (comorbidity).

RESULTS

The analysis indicated that elderly patients were more likely to be referred for non-curative treatment (OR 13.71; 95% CI 5.67-33.12; P < 0.0001 for prostate cancer and OR 17.67; 95% CI 4.04-77.31; P < 0.0001 for breast cancer). The other variables (performance status and medical history) did not affect treatment orientation. However, GPs were prepared to seek assistance from oncologists in both cases, irrespective of the patient's age.

CONCLUSION

Age seems to be more important among GPs in deciding how to manage cancer patients than performance status and comorbidity. This is a very common prejudice. They are, nevertheless, inclined to refer people with cancer to oncologists independently of the patient's age.

Reasons for non-standard treatment in elderly patients with advanced head and neck cancer

Elderly patients with head and neck cancer are less likely to receive standard treatment. This study assessed the influence that age, tumour characteristics, comorbidity, social support, depressive symptoms and quality of life have on treatment choice. One hundred and five patients between 45 and 60 years of age and 78 patients of > or =70 years of age with carcinoma of the oral cavity (stage > or =II), oro- and hypopharynx (stage > or =II) or larynx (stage > or =III) completed a questionnaire on quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35), depressive symptoms (CES-D) and social support (RSS12-I). In the 45-60 age group, 89% received standard treatment, compared with 62% of the > or =70 age group. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the following factors predicted non-standard treatment: marital status (widowed), advanced tumour stage, comorbidity, less pain, considering the length of life less important than its quality and old age. This study showed that age itself independently influences treatment choice. However, it should be emphasised that the choice of a treatment should be based on a medical assessment and the patient's preferences, not on chronological age.

Short course radiation therapy for elderly cancer patients. Evidences from the literature review

The choice of the appropriate treatment strategy for elderly cancer patients may be a difficult challenge. Radiation therapy is commonly offered to these patients, but treatment duration may represent a limiting factor, as many patients cannot tolerate a conventional course of radiotherapy (RT) due to age-related medical or logistic problems. Hypofractionated RT may represent a very convenient choice, but it entails an increased risk of late toxicity occurrence. We made a literature review to define the possible role of hypofractionated RT for elderly cancer patients. As expected, we found out that short irradiation schedules are more commonly employed for treatments with palliative aims but a more widespread use of these regimes is still controversial. The lack of prospective trials tailored for these patients makes even more difficult to tailor the choice of treatment on standardised treatment guidelines. Nevertheless our review highlights that for several tumour types RT can be scheduled conveniently and effectively in order to achieve local disease control and/or symptom relief with the least discomfort and treatment-related morbidity for elderly patients.

Differentiated thyroid carcinoma in the elderly

The overall prognosis of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer is excellent, but the prognosis is rapidly worsening, when the disease is diagnosed in elderly patients. Old patients more often present with poor prognostic features, such as large tumors, follicular or Hürthle cell subtypes, extrathyroidal growth and distant metastases. Therefore, an optimal therapeutic approach is recommended. Current therapy includes a total thyroidectomy, if necessary combined with a lymph node dissection and followed by high dose radioiodine ablation. Radioiodine therapy in elderly patients meets specific problems, concerning thyroid hormone withdrawal, side effects of 131I and nursing problems. Additional treatment of residual, recurrent or metastatic disease must be tailored, according to the stage of the disease, and should not be denied on the basis of chronological age. Lifelong treatment with suppressive thyroid hormone therapy does not lead to important long-term side effects at old age.

Brachytherapy in the elderly

A rapidly and constantly increasing aged population in the western countries poses a wide range of specific problems to oncologists. A different way to face medical issues should be sought for older patients with cancer, looking at the characteristics that are peculiar to the elderly from different points of view. Brachytherapy is an effective form of radiotherapy which, for its specific characteristics, may be a valid alternative to more complex modalities of treatment, thus allowing a better sparing of normal tissues and structures yet achieving a similar tumor control rate. This paper reviews the literature on the subject of cancer treatment in the elderly, focusing on radiotherapy and brachytherapy, to evaluate the current attitude toward this problem in the medical community and to see if it is possible to identify a patient population that will benefit from this technique.

Radical combined treatment of locally extensive head and neck cancer in the elderly

PURPOSE

Few studies have described the effects of aggressive combined therapy for locally extensive head and neck cancer in the elderly. Our study evaluated the outcome of this particular cohort of patients after such treatments.

METHODS

Survival, failure, morbidity, and complication rates were determined retrospectively in 43 elderly patients with stage III or IV head and neck cancer who underwent curative surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (n = 33) or neoadjuvant, 3-drug chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (n = 10) between the years 1977 and 1992.

RESULTS

The crude survival rate at 3 years was 27% in patients managed by surgery plus radiotherapy, and 30% in individuals treated with chemoradiation; the corresponding locoregional failure rates were 23% and 30%; and the distant failure rates were 13% and 0%, respectively. The acute toxicity rate was 12% in the surgery plus radiotherapy group and 30% in the chemoradiation patients; the corresponding late complication rates were 0% and 10%. There were no toxic deaths.

CONCLUSION

Radical combined treatments can be performed safely and achieve long-term, disease-free survival in selected elderly patients with locally extensive head and neck cancer.

Radiation therapy in cancer patients 80 years of age and older

There is a paucity of clinical data regarding radiation therapy in elderly patients. This is a retrospective study of all patients aged 80 years and older who underwent treatment with external beam irradiation at a single site. There were a total of 183 patients treated with 226 courses of therapy. The mean age was 84 years (range: 80-98 years). Fifty-eight percent of the patients were male. The treatment was deemed palliative in 51% and curative in 49%. The primary cancer diagnoses were: prostate 36, lung 28, breast 25, head and neck 23, gastrointestinal 21, hematologic 12, gynecologic 11, skin 11, genitourinary 9, unknown primary 6, central nervous system 1. The patients were able to complete the prescribed therapy in 173 of 226 courses (77%). Treatment breaks during the radiation courses were required in 81 (36%) of the courses. Radiation therapy can be safely administered to an elderly population with both curative and palliative intent with the expectation of completion in more than 80% of patients. The reasons for inability to complete therapy as prescribed are multifactorial, but careful patient selection and attention to comorbidity may optimize outcome. Further research is needed to better define these parameters.

Radiotherapy in head and neck cancer in the elderly: a challenge

Elderly patients represent the most rapidly growing subgroup of the patient population in France and in the majority of industrialized countries. The effect of age in terms of the prognosis and response to treatment remains unclear. The management strategy (curative versus palliative) for head and neck cancer in the elderly has given vent to divergent opinions and controversies in several respects (the type and quality of treatment, quality of life and economic consequences). This review only focuses on the radiotherapy schedule and head and neck cancers. We compare aged patients with head and neck cancer to younger patients in terms of clinical features, tumor biology, type of treatment, side effects and response. We conclude that if the patient is in a good general condition following a complete evaluation of the cancer, physicians should propose curative treatment with radiotherapy because retrospective trials demonstrate that response in older patients when treated aggressively is comparable to that of younger patients. However, specific trials concerning aged patients with head and neck cancer, quality of life and radiotherapy are warranted.

Radiation therapy of the older patient

Radiotherapy has a major role in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer therapy. It is widely used for curative and palliative treatment of cancer involving various sites. Radiotherapy is of particular benefit to older and frail cancer patients as an alternative to surgery and to systemic therapy. The available data on the sensitivity of normal tissues to radiotherapy in elderly patients strongly suggest that older patients with good functional status tolerate radiotherapy as well as younger patients and have comparable tumor response and survival rates. Aggressive radiotherapy should not be withheld from older patients because of chronological age alone.

Assessment of the older cancer patient

The correct assessment of a cancer patient is a key step in the treatment process. In older people, this assessment entails not only the patient's basic medical history and the standard cancer staging, but also much more comprehensive evaluation of the various facets of the patient's health and environment that may interfere with his or her therapy. Patient fitness for elective surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy must be considered. Geriatricians have defined the relevant aspects of the general evaluation of the older person, and now this work is being adapted to cancer patients. This article reviews the various aspects of a comprehensive assessment applicable to the cancer patient in settings such as academic oncology programs, cooperative group studies, and private oncology practice.

Cancer in patients aged 90 years or older: radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of radiation therapy for cancer in patients aged 90 years or older.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cancer cases in 32 patients (11 men, 21 women) aged 90 years or older who underwent radiation therapy in 1970-1997 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean patient age was 92.2 years, with a range of 90-98 years. Head and neck cancer (n = 14 [44%]) and skin cancer (n = 6 [19%]) were the most common.

RESULTS

Eleven (79%) of the 14 patients with head and neck cancer were treated with curative intent. Radiation response without any severe complication was observed in nine (90%) of the 10 patients with head and neck cancer treated with curative intent who finished treatment. The median survival time was 8 months (range, 3-55 months) in the 10 patients with head and neck cancer who completed treatment with curative intent. Complete response was achieved in all of the patients with skin cancer without any major sequelae. Complete response was also observed in all three of the patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but two patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy died of drug-induced pneumonitis. Palliation was achieved in all nine of the patients treated with palliative intent.

CONCLUSION

Age of 90 years or older is not a limiting factor for radiation therapy.

[Radiotherapy of the elderly patient. Radiotherapy tolerance and results in older patients]

BACKGROUND

Despite a growing number of elderly patients receiving radiation therapy little is known about side effects and outcome of irradiation in this section of the population.

METHODS

In a review article epidemiologic data, aspects of radiation-biology as well as side effects and outcome of radiation therapy of elderly patients are discussed.

RESULTS

Cancer incidence rises with age (Figure 1) and is exceeding 3.5% for males older than 85 years. With a life expectancy of more than 4 years, curative therapy is indicated even at this age. Furthermore several retrospective studies indicate that local control and disease-Specific survival after radiation therapy of elderly patients is comparable with that of younger persons (Tables 3 and 4). The exception contains elderly patients with Grade-III to IV gliomas or with rectal carcinoma who show a reduced survival which is perhaps caused by less aggressive combined treatment (tumor resection). Although some biological and molecular data indicate a rise in radiation sensitivity with growing age like the reduction of the capacity of some DNA-repair enzymes, there is no convincing evidence in animal studies or in retrospective clinical studies that radiation therapy is generally less well tolerated by older individuals (Tables 1 and 2). Some age-depending differences in organ toxicities are described in 3 large studies, which evaluate the data of patients who were enrolled in different EORTC-trials: Older patients suffer more of functional mucositis in case of radiation therapy to the head and neck, they have an increased weight loss and a higher frequency of late esophageal damage when irradiated in the thorax, and they show a higher prevalence of sexual dysfunction when treated with radiation therapy to the pelvis. On the other hand younger patients suffer more from acute toxicity like skin damage, nausea, and deterioration of the performance status during pelvic radiotherapy. When discussing the dose intensity of radiation therapy concomitant disease which leads to extensive atherosclerotic vessel damage should be kept in mind. Old patients should be monitored closely during therapy, since the loss of electrolytes or fluid is often not very well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The indication to radiation therapy of elderly cancer patients should take into account their performance status as well as the extent and the severity of comorbidity. Age per se is seldom a contraindication for radiation therapy. Regarding the available data in literature there is no indication for a dose reduction in radiation therapy only because of age, especially in the curative setting.

Treatment of anal carcinoma in the elderly: feasibility and outcome of radical radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

For most cancers, information on treatment tolerance and results for elderly patients is quite limited. This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and results of curative nonsurgical treatment of patients age 75 years or older with anal carcinoma.

METHODS

From January 1976 through June 1996, invasive anal squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 58 patients age > or = 75 years. Curative treatment was administered to 47 patients (81%), of whom 42 received radiotherapy (RT), either used alone (21) or associated with concomitant chemotherapy (CT). RT was administered in two sequences, the first in which a median dose of 39.6 gray (Gy) was delivered with megavoltage photon beams, followed (after a median interval of 43 days) by a boost with either brachytherapy or external beam (median dose, 20 Gy). CT started on Day 1 and generally consisted of 1 cycle of mitomycin C (MMC; median dose, 9.5 mg/m2) and a 96-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; median dose, 600 mg/m2/day). The median follow-up for all patients was 48 months (range, 5-163 months).

RESULTS

Of 40 patients (95%) who completed curative treatment, acute toxicity resulted in shortening of the planned first irradiation sequence in 2 patients (1 in each group) and an unplanned treatment break in 11 patients (4 in the RT group and 7 in the RT-CT group). Grade 2 and 3 acute reactions (RTOG) were observed in 43% and 54% of patients, respectively. Among all Grade 3 reactions, 32% occurred in the RT group and 68% in the RT-CT group. In patients receiving RT-CT, Grade 2-3 leukopenia was observed in 25% of patients, Grade 2-3 fatigue was observed in 58% of patients, and Grade 2 cardiac toxicity related to 5-FU occurred in 1 patient. At 5 years, the overall survival was 54% (49% and 59% for the RT and RT-CT groups, respectively, P = 0.28), and the actuarial local control rate was 78.5% (73% and 83% for the RT and RT-CT groups, respectively, P=0.36). Five patients presented with Grade 3-4 late complications, all of them in the RT-CT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The current series confirms the feasibility of sphincter-conserving treatment for elderly patients who present with anal carcinoma. Rates of acute or late complications appeared similar to those observed in younger patients, and the oncologic results were at least as favorable as those commonly reported.

Radiotherapy in the elderly

Older patients with cancer are frequently victims of discriminatory treatment strategies according to parameters unrelated to the tumour itself. The general approach is influenced by the belief that good tolerance to radiotherapy might be compromised in older patients and that the course of cancer might be less aggressive in this age group. Substandard treatment is therefore often offered to older patients, although this attitude is supported neither by clinical nor by scientific evidence, but rather stems from a lack of specific knowledge of the actual cancer prognosis and the tolerance to radiotherapy in the elderly. In clinical practice advanced age may result in undertreatment, even though patients may have no other medical illness and no functional impairment. Some comorbid conditions which are more frequent in older patients may complicate the outcome of treatment. However, these impaired vital functions are not an intrinsic feature of the elderly. Overall, noncompliance in radiotherapy, related to comorbidity or technical condition, is rare. Short-term radiotherapy using a large daily fraction is often advocated in elderly patients; however, this should only be considered if a palliative treatment option has previously been selected due to the high risk of late side-effects. Acute side-effects often result in decreasing doses of radiotherapy. Data on acute tolerance of radiotherapy for different types of tumours did not demonstrate a radical difference in occurrence of toxicities. 'Reducing' radiotherapy is never a solution, unless the life expectancy of the patient is obviously so short that the tumour recurrence is unlikely to occur or at least to produce substantial morbidity before the patient has died from other causes.

Radiotherapy for cancer patients aged 80 and older: a study of effectiveness and side effects

PURPOSE

To profile cancer patients aged 80 and older undergoing radiotherapy and to study the tumor response and side effects of therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients aged 80 and older who received radiation therapy at James A. Haley Veterans Hospital and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center between 1988 and 1995. A total of 203 patients aged 80-94 received radiotherapy during this period. Treatment sites included head and neck [50], breast [16], chest [37], pelvis [53], and miscellaneous [39]. Age, treatment site, field size, total dose, response to treatment, treatment interruptions, incidence and severity of weight loss, myelosuppression, diarrhea, mucositis, dermatitis, and follow-up status are assessed using our departmental records and hospital tumor registry.

RESULTS

Of 191 patients evaluated, 179 (94%) completed the treatment without serious complications. A total of 195 sites were irradiated. Twelve patients (6%) required interruption of the treatment. Therapeutic responses were seen in 86 out of 112 patients (77%) treated with curative intent (with 67% complete response) and in 67 out of 83 patients (81%) treated with palliative intent. The causes of treatment interruptions included weight loss from diarrhea, dysphagia, and progressive disease. Treatment interruptions were more likely in patients treated with large treatment fields. In patients treated for upper aero-digestive tract cancer, Grade 3 and 4 mucositis was noted in 20 and 2% of patients, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 enteritis was noted in 43% of patients treated for pelvic malignancies. Grade 3 dermatitis was noted only in 2% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is highly effective and well tolerated by the oldest old. Age is not a contraindication to aggressive radiotherapy.