RNA polymerase makes important contacts upstream from base pair -49 at the Escherichia coli galactose operon P1 promoter

Regulatory Elements Located in the Upstream Region of the Rhizobium leguminosarum rosR Global Regulator Are Essential for Its Transcription and mRNA Stability

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii is a soil bacterium capable of establishing a symbiotic relationship with clover (Trifolium spp.). Previously, the rosR gene, encoding a global regulatory protein involved in motility, synthesis of cell-surface components, and other cellular processes was identified and characterized in this bacterium. This gene possesses a long upstream region that contains several regulatory motifs, including inverted repeats (IRs) of different lengths. So far, the role of these motifs in the regulation of rosR transcription has not been elucidated in detail. In this study, we performed a functional analysis of these motifs using a set of transcriptional rosR-lacZ fusions that contain mutations in these regions. The levels of rosR transcription for different mutant variants were evaluated in R. leguminosarum using both quantitative real-time PCR and β-galactosidase activity assays. Moreover, the stability of wild type rosR transcripts and those with mutations in the regulatory motifs was determined using an RNA decay assay and plasmids with mutations in different IRs located in the 5′-untranslated region of the gene. The results show that transcription of rosR undergoes complex regulation, in which several regulatory elements located in the upstream region and some regulatory proteins are engaged. These include an upstream regulatory element, an extension of the -10 element containing three nucleotides TGn (TGn-extended -10 element), several IRs, and PraR repressor related to quorum sensing.

Transcription Initiation by Mix and Match Elements: Flexibility for Polymerase Binding to Bacterial Promoters

Bacterial RNA polymerase is composed of a core of subunits (β β′, α1, α2, ω), which have RNA synthesizing activity, and a specificity factor (σ), which identifies the start of transcription by recognizing and binding to sequence elements within promoter DNA. Four core promoter consensus sequences, the –10 element, the extended –10 (TGn) element, the –35 element, and the UP elements, have been known for many years; the importance of a nontemplate G at position -5 has been recognized more recently. However, the functions of these elements are not the same. The AT-rich UP elements, the –35 elements (–35TTGACA–30), and the extended –10 (15TGn–13) are recognized as double-stranded binding elements, whereas the –5 nontemplate G is recognized in the context of single-stranded DNA at the transcription bubble. Furthermore, the –10 element (–12TATAAT–7) is recognized as both double-stranded DNA for the T:A bp at position –12 and as nontemplate, single-stranded DNA from positions –11 to –7. The single-stranded sequences at positions –11 to –7 as well as the –5 contribute to later steps in transcription initiation that involve isomerization of polymerase and separation of the promoter DNA around the transcription start site. Recent work has demonstrated that the double-stranded elements may be used in various combinations to yield an effective promoter. Thus, while some minimal number of contacts is required for promoter function, polymerase allows the elements to be mixed and matched. Interestingly, which particular elements are used does not appear to fundamentally alter the transcription bubble generated in the stable complex. In this review, we discuss the multiple steps involved in forming a transcriptionally competent polymerase/promoter complex, and we examine what is known about polymerase recognition of core promoter elements. We suggest that considering promoter elements according to their involvement in early (polymerase binding) or later (polymerase isomerization) steps in transcription initiation rather than simply from their match to conventional promoter consensus sequences is a more instructive form of promoter classification.

Differential role of base pairs on gal promoters strength

Sequence alignments of promoters in prokaryotes postulated that the frequency of occurrence of a base pair at a given position of promoter elements reflects its contribution to intrinsic promoter strength. We directly assessed the contribution of the four base pairs in each position in the intrinsic promoter strength by keeping the context constant in Escherichia coli cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) regulated gal promoters by in vitro transcription assays. First, we show that base pair frequency within known consensus elements correlates well with promoter strength. Second, we observe some substitutions upstream of the ex-10 TG motif that are important for promoter function. Although the galP1 and P2 promoters overlap, only three positions where substitutions inactivated both promoters were found. We propose that RNA polymerase binds to the -12T base pair as part of double-stranded DNA while opening base pairs from -11A to +3 to form the single-stranded transcription bubble DNA during isomerization. The cAMP-CRP complex rescued some deleterious substitutions in the promoter region. The base pair roles and their flexibilities reported here for E. coli gal promoters may help construction of synthetic promoters in gene circuitry experiments in which overlapping promoters with differential controls may be warranted.

Recruitment of RNA polymerase to Class II CRP-dependent promoters is improved by a second upstream-bound CRP molecule

Genetics and biochemistry have been exploited to investigate transcription activation by the Escherichia coli CRP (cAMP receptor protein) factor at promoters with a DNA site for CRP near position −41 and the effects of a second upstream-bound CRP molecule. We show that the upstream-bound CRP contributes to transcription activation by improving the recruitment of RNA polymerase.

UPs and downs in bacterial transcription initiation: the role of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase in promoter recognition

In recent years, it has become clear that promoter recognition by bacterial RNA polymerase involves interactions not only between core promoter elements and the sigma subunit, but also between a DNA element upstream of the core promoter and the alpha subunit. DNA binding by alpha can increase transcription dramatically. Here we review the current state of our understanding of the alpha interaction with DNA during basal transcription initiation (i.e. in the absence of proteins other than RNA polymerase) and activated transcription initiation (i.e. when stimulated by transcription factors).

Interactions between activating region 3 of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein and region 4 of the RNA polymerase sigma(70) subunit: application of suppression genetics

The Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP, induces transcription at Class II CRP-dependent promoters by making three different activatory contacts with different surfaces of holo RNA polymerase. One contact surface of CRP, known as Activating Region 3 (AR3), is functional in the downstream subunit of the CRP dimer and is predicted to interact with region 4 of the RNAP sigma(70) subunit. We have previously shown that a mutant CRP derivative that activates transcription primarily via AR3, CRP HL159 KE101 KN52, requires the positively charged residues K593, K597 and R599 in sigma(70) for activation. Here, we have used the positive control substitution, EK58, to disrupt AR3-dependent activation by CRP HL159 KE101 KN52. We then screened random mutant libraries and an alanine scan library of sigma(70) for candidates that restore activation by CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 EK58. We found that changes at R596 and R599 in sigma(70) can restore activation by CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 EK58. This suggests that the side-chains of both R596 and R599 in sigma(70) clash with K58 in CRP. Maximal activation by CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 EK58 is achieved with the substitutions RE596 or RD596 in sigma(70). We propose that there are specific charge-charge interactions between E596 or D596 in sigma(70) and K58 in AR3. Thus, no increase in activation is observed in the presence of another positive control substitution, EG58 (CRP HL159 KE101 KN52 EG58). Similarly, both sigma(70) RE596 and sigma(70) RD596 can restore activation by CRP EK58 but not CRP EG58, and they both decrease activation by wild-type CRP. We suggest that E596 and D596 in sigma(70) can positively interact with K58 in AR3, thereby enhancing activation, but negatively interact with E58, thereby decreasing activation. The substitution, KA52 in AR3 increases Class II CRP-dependent activation by removing an inhibitory lysine residue. However, this increase is not observed in the presence of either sigma(70) RE596 or sigma(70) RD596. We conclude that the inhibitory side-chain, K52 in AR3, clashes with R596 in sigma(70). Finally, we show that the sigma(70) RE596 and RD596 substitutions affect CRP-dependent activation from Class II, but not Class I, promoters.

Characterization of the promoter elements for the staphylococcal enterotoxin D gene

Deletion analysis of the promoter for the Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin D determinant indicated that a 52-bp sequence, from -34 to +18, was sufficient for sed promoter function and agr regulation. A consensus -10 Pribnow box sequence, a less conserved -35 sequence, and a TG dinucleotide motif were present. Transcribed sequences (+1 to +18) are essential for promoter activity.

Temperature-dependence of open-complex formation at two Escherichia coli promoters with extended -10 sequences

We have studied the formation of open complexes between purified RNA polymerase from Escherichia coli and DNA fragments carrying the galP1 promoter, a promoter with an extended -10 region. Unusually, these complexes are formed readily at low temperatures. This low-temperature opening is unaffected by deletions of either upstream or downstream promoter sequences. We conclude that low-temperature open-complex formation is due to specific base sequences in and just upstream of the extended -10 region. In contrast, open complexes are not formed at low temperatures with DNA fragments carrying the E. coli cysG promoter, which also has an extended -10 region. This demonstrates that an extended -10 sequence alone is not sufficient for low-temperature opening. Additionally, we report the temperature dependence of a hybrid galP1-cysG promoter, the related galP2 and galP3 promoters and a derivative of galP1 with an improved -10 hexamer sequence.

Orientation of functional activating regions in the Escherichia coli CRP protein during transcription activation at class II promoters

At class II CRP-dependent promoters the DNA site for CRP overlaps the DNA site for RNA polymerase, covering the -35 region. Transcription activation at class II CRP- dependent promoters requires a contact between an activating region in the upstream subunit of the bound CRP dimer and a contact site in the C-terminal domain of the alpha-subunit of RNA polymerase. Transcription activation is suppressed by amino acid substitutions in the activating region, but activation can be restored by second site substitutions at K52 or E96. These substitutions identify two separate regions on the surface of CRP that appear to be able to interact with RNA polymerase specifically at class II promoters. Using the method of 'oriented heterodimers' we show that these alternative activating regions are functional in the downstream subunit of the bound CRP dimer.

Interactions between the cyclic AMP receptor protein and the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase at the Escherichia coli galactose operon P1 promoter

DNAase I footprinting has been used to study open complexes between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and the galactose operon P1 promoter, both in the absence and the presence of CRP (the cyclic AMP receptor protein, a transcription activator). From the effects of deletion of the C-terminal part of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit, we deduce that alpha binds at the upstream end of both the binary RNA polymerase-galP1 and ternary RNA polymerase-CRP-galP1 complexes. Disruption of the alpha-upstream contact suppresses open complex formation at galP1 at lower temperatures. In ternary RNA polymerase-CRP-galP1 complexes, alpha appears to make direct contact with Activating Region 1 in CRP. DNAase I footprinting has been used to detect and quantify interactions between purified alpha and CRP bound at galP1.

Thermal energy requirement for strand separation during transcription initiation: the effect of supercoiling and extended protein DNA contacts

We have studied the role of extended protein DNA contacts and DNA topology on the ability of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to form open complexes at several related promoters. The -35 region of several Escherichia coli promoters do not have homology with the consensus sequence, but still drive activator independent transcription initiation. This is due to the presence of a TG motif upstream from the -10 hexamer creating an 'extended -10' promoter. We have previously shown that two 'extended -10' promoters, galP1 and pBla, can form open complexes at lower temperatures than the galP1 derivative, galPcon6, which has a consensus -35 hexamer. Here we report further investigations into the mechanism of open complex formation by RNA polymerase, in particular the thermal energy requirement. A single base pair change in galPcon6 creating an 'extended -10' sequence, results in a 20 degrees C reduction in the temperature requirement for open complex formation. The DNA topology has also been shown to effect the thermal energy requirement for strand separation. Promoters carried on supercoiled plasmids form open complexes at lower temperatures than when present on linear DNA templates. We have also shown that in vivo, RNA polymerase can form open complexes at lower temperatures than those observed for linear templates in vitro, but requires slightly higher temperatures than supercoiled templates in vitro, however the promoter hierachy remains the same.

Determination of common structural features in Escherichia coli promoters by computer analysis

Escherichia coli promoters show a large degree of sequence variation. However, they are all recognized specifically by RNA polymerase as the sites for transcription initiation, suggesting that they share common basic structural features distinguishing them from the rest of the sequence. Our hypothesis is that the promoter is determined not only by the two consensus sequences at -10 and -35, but also by the surrounding nucleotides, and that it is not only the identity of the nucleotides that is important for promoter function but the presence of specific physical-chemical and structural characteristics that are sequence dependent. This approach is supported by accumulating evidence indicating the role that the DNA conformation may play in modulating protein-DNA interaction. In this study, four intrinsic sequence-dependent characteristics are examined in E. coli promoter regions: helix stability, helix flexibility, and two conformational parameters represented by the DNA tendencies for B-->Z and B-->A transition. The promoter is defined by the consensus sequences and their vicinity and the examined properties are compared between promoter and random sequences. It is demonstrated that both the consensus and flanking regions are less stable, more flexible and show a higher tendency for the B conformation in comparison to random sequences. Discriminant analysis is used to evaluate the relative contributions of the various characteristics.

Promoters responsive to DNA bending: a common theme in prokaryotic gene expression

The early notion of DNA as a passive target for regulatory proteins has given way to the realization that higher-order DNA structures and DNA-protein complexes are at the basis of many molecular processes, including control of promoter activity. Protein binding may direct the bending of an otherwise linear DNA, exacerbate the angle of an intrinsic bend, or assist the directional flexibility of certain sequences within prokaryotic promoters. The important, sometimes essential role of intrinsic or protein-induced DNA bending in transcriptional regulation has become evident in virtually every system examined. As discussed throughout this article, not every function of DNA bends is understood, but their presence has been detected in a wide variety of bacterial promoters subjected to positive or negative control. Nonlinear DNA structures facilitate and even determine proximal and distal DNA-protein and protein-protein contacts involved in the various steps leading to transcription initiation.

Regulation of transcription at the ndh promoter of Escherichia coli by FNR and novel factors

FNR is a transcriptional regulator that controls gene expression in response to oxygen limitation in Escherichia coli. The NADH dehydrogenase II gene (ndh) is repressed by FNR under anaerobic conditions. Repression is not simply due to occlusion of the promoter (-35 and -10) region by FNR because adjacent pairs of FNR monomers were found to bind at two sites centred at -50.5 and -94.5 in the ndh promoter region without preventing RNA polymerase binding. However, contact between RNA polymerase and the -132 to -62 region of the non-coding strand of ndh DNA, and RNA polymerase-mediated open complex formation, were prevented by bound FNR. The upstream FNR-binding site (-94.5) was needed for efficient FNR-dependent repression of ndh transcription in vitro, and also for repression of an ndh-lacZ fusion in vivo. Anaerobic ndh repression may thus involve the binding of two pairs of FNR monomers upstream of the -35 region, which prevents essential RNA polymerase-DNA contacts in the upstream region as well as inhibiting RNA polymerase function by direct FNR interaction. Expression of the ndh-lacZ fusion in an fnr deletion strain was enhanced by anaerobic growth in rich medium or minimal medium supplemented with amino acids. Furthermore, two proteins (M(r) 12,000 and 35,000) which interact with and may activate transcription from the ndh promoter under these conditions were detected by gel retardation analysis. These putative amino acid-responsive activators may thus offset FNR-mediated repression and maintain a low level of anaerobic ndh expression for regulating the NAD+/NADH ratio during growth in rich media.

Nitrate reductases in Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli expresses two different membrane-bound respiratory nitrate reductases, nitrate reductase A (NRA) and nitrate reductase Z (NRZ). In this review, we compare the genetic control, biochemical properties and regulation of these two closely related enzyme systems. The two enzymes are encoded by distinct operons located within two different loci on the E. coli chromosome. The narGHJI operon, encoding nitrate reductaseA, is located in the chlC locus at 27 minutes, along with several functionally related genes: narK, encoding a nitrate/nitrite antiporter, and the narXL operon, encoding a nitrate-activated, two component regulatory system. The narZYWV operon, encoding nitrate reductase Z, is located in the chlZ locus located at 32.5 minutes, a region which includes a narK homologue, narU, but no apparent homologue to the narXL operon. The two membrane-bound enzymes have similar structures and biochemical properties and are capable of reducing nitrate using normal physiological substrates. The homology of the amino acid sequences of the peptides encoded by the two operons is extremely high but the intergenic regions share no related sequences. The expression of both the narGHJI operon and the narK gene are positively regulated by two transacting factors Fnr and NarL-Phosphate, activated respectively by anaerobiosis and nitrate, while the narZYWV operon and the narU gene are constitutively expressed. Nitrate reductase A, which accounts for 98% of the nitrate reductase activity when fully induced, is clearly the major respiratory nitrate reductase in E. coli while the physiological role of the constitutively expressed nitrate reductase Z remains to be defined.

The Escherichia coli cysG promoter belongs to the 'extended -10' class of bacterial promoters

The Escherichia coli cysG promoter has been subcloned and shown to function constitutively in a range of different growth conditions. Point mutations identify the -10 hexamer and an important 5'-TGN-3' motif immediately upstream. The effects of different deletions suggest that specific sequences in the -35 region are not essential for the activity of this promoter in vivo. This conclusion was confirmed by in vitro run-off transcription assays. The DNAase I footprint of RNA polymerase at the cysG promoter reveals extended protection upstream of the transcript start, and studies with potassium permanganate as a probe suggest that the upstream region is distorted in open complexes. Taken together, the results show that the cysG promoter belongs to the 'extended -10' class of promoters, and the base sequence is similar to that of the P1 promoter of the E. coli galactose operon, another promoter in this class. In vivo, messenger initiated at the cysG promoter appears to be processed by cleavage at a site 41 bases downstream from the transcript start point.

A third recognition element in bacterial promoters: DNA binding by the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase

A DNA sequence rich in (A+T), located upstream of the -10, -35 region of the Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA promoter rrnB P1 and called the UP element, stimulates transcription by a factor of 30 in vivo, as well as in vitro in the absence of protein factors other than RNA polymerase (RNAP). When fused to other promoters, such as lacUV5, the UP element also stimulates transcription, indicating that it is a separate promoter module. Mutations in the carboxyl-terminal region of the alpha subunit of RNAP prevent stimulation of these promoters by the UP element although the mutant enzymes are effective in transcribing the "core" promoters (those lacking the UP element). Protection of UP element DNA by the mutant RNAPs is severely reduced in footprinting experiments, suggesting that the selective decrease in transcription might result from defective interactions between alpha and the UP element. Purified alpha binds specifically to the UP element, confirming that alpha acts directly in promoter recognition. Transcription of three other promoters was also reduced by the COOH-terminal alpha mutations. These results suggest that UP elements comprise a third promoter recognition region (in addition to the -10, -35 recognition hexamers, which interact with the sigma subunit) and may account for the presence of (A+T)-rich DNA upstream of many prokaryotic promoters. Since the same alpha mutations also block activation by some transcription factors, mechanisms of promoter stimulation by upstream DNA elements and positive control by certain transcription factors may be related.

A comparison of the DNA bending activities of the DNA binding proteins CRP and TFIID

Protein-induced DNA bending is of importance in the formation of complex nucleoprotein assemblies such as those involved in the initiation of DNA replication or transcription initiation. We have compared the DNA bending characteristics of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP or CAP), an archetypal DNA bending protein, to those of TFIID, the eukaryotic TATA-element binding transcription factor. By altering the helical phasing between a CRP binding site and the E. coli melR promoter we have mapped a DNA sequence-directed bend in the downstream region of the promoter. This intrinsic DNA bend may be important in the regulation of the melR promoter by CRP in vivo. Gel retardation assays and DNAse I footprinting show that human TFIID binds to the melR promoter - 10 region. Taking advantage of this fact, and using the CRP-induced DNA bend as a standard, we have employed phase sensitive detection to show that the DNA bend angle induced by TFIID is far less than that induced by CRP. Further evidence to support this conclusion comes from a comparison of the relative mobilities of CRP-DNA and TFIID-DNA complexes. These results place limits on the role of any DNA bending induced by TFIID alone in the initiation of transcription.

Upstream curved sequences influence the initiation of transcription at the Escherichia coli galactose operon

The two overlapping promoters that control mRNA synthesis at the galactose operon contain three phased stretches of adenine residues, located around positions -84.5, -74 and -63, with respect ot the start of the P1 promoter. As a result, the corresponding DNA sequence is bent, an anomaly that is relieved by the addition of small concentrations of drugs like distamycin A or netropsin. By abortive initiation assays performed on several DNA fragments derived from the wild-type promoter or from various mutants we show that the curved sequence increases the strength of the P1 promoter. In the absence of cyclic AMP (cAMP) and of the corresponding receptor protein (CRP), the upstream curved sequences enhance the rate of isomerization from the closed to the open complex at P1. This effect is abolished when distamycin A is bound in the bent region. In the presence of cAMP-CRP, a more drastic change is observed: activation of the gal P1 promoter takes place at a different formal step, depending whether the upstream curved sequence is present or not (enhancement of the rate of conversion from a closed to an open complex instead of an increase in the affinity of the enzyme during closed complex formation). These data, together with previous results obtained with other mutants of the gal control region, suggest that several closed complexes corresponding to different nucleoprotein arrangements are formed during open complex formation at gal P1, in the presence of CRP.

Regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters. Simultaneous interaction of RNA polymerase, gal repressor and CAP/cAMP

The regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters by galactose repressor and catabolite activator protein/cyclic AMP (CAP/cAMP) was investigated in DNA-binding and kinetic experiments performed in vitro. We found that gal repressor and CAP/cAMP bind to the gal regulatory region independently, resulting in simultaneous occupancy of the two gal operators and the CAP/cAMP binding site. Both CAP/cAMP and gal repressor altered the partitioning of RNA polymerase between the two overlapping gal promoters. Open complexes formed in the absence of added regulatory proteins were partitioned between gal P1 and P2 with occupancies of 25% and 75%, respectively. CAP/cAMP caused open complexes to be formed nearly exclusively at P1 (98% occupancy). gal repressor caused a co-ordinated, but incomplete, switch in promoter partitioning from P1 to P2 in both the absence and presence of CAP/cAMP. We measured the kinetic constants governing open complex formation and decay at the gal promoters in the absence and presence of gal repressor and CAP/cAMP. CAP/cAMP had the largest effect on the kinetics of open complex formation, resulting in a 30-fold increase in the apparent binding constant. We conclude that the regulation of open complex formation at the gal promoters does not result from competition between gal repressor, CAP/cAMP and RNA polymerase for binding at the gal operon regulatory region, but instead results from the interactions of the three proteins during the formation of a nucleoprotein complex on the gal DNA fragment. Finally, we present a kinetic model for the regulation of open complex formation at the gal operon.

The role of two surface exposed loops in transcription activation by the Escherichia coli CRP and FNR proteins

We have investigated a number of mutations that alter the ability of the E. coli transcription factors CRP and FNR to activate transcription. In CRP, some mutations at position 159 (H159L, H159I and delta 159) prevent transcription activation at a number of naturally-occurring and semi-synthetic CRP-dependent promoters. We suggest that some feature of the surface-exposed turn around residue 159 is recognised by RNA polymerase during transcription activation at these promoters. Mutations at position 52 increase CRP activity and reverse the effects of H159L and delta 159, most likely by creating a new contact with RNA polymerase. However this new contact only gives increased expression when the CRP binding site is located 41 1/2 base pairs upstream of the transcription start site and fails to reverse the effects of H159L and delta 159 at promoters where the CRP site is located further upstream. To explain our results we propose that the two surface-exposed turns around residues 52 and 159 contain elements that are potential RNA polymerase docking sites: in the CRP dimer these two active patches are located on adjacent faces of different subunits. FNR, a related transcription activator, contains amino acid sequences homologous to the CRP sequence around position 52. Mutations in this zone (from residues 81-88 in FNR) reduce expression from an FNR-dependent promoter without stopping FNR binding to its target. This defines a patch on FNR, which is homologous to the CRP surface-exposed loop around position 52, which is involved in transcription activation, most likely by contacting RNA polymerase.

Different thermal energy requirement for open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at two related promoters

We have studied the effect of temperature on transcription initiation in vitro at two related promoters ga/Pcon and ga/P1, which have the same nucleotide sequence around the -10 region and transcription start site, but differ in upstream sequences. One of the promoters, ga/Pcon, carries the consensus -35 hexamer, 5'TTGACA 3', whilst ga/P1 contains a block of 'distortable' upstream sequences that allow promoter function in the absence of a -35 region consensus sequence. RNA polymerase can form complexes with both promoters at a range of temperatures. However, the thermal energy requirement for open complex formation differs: open complexes can form at ga/P1 at low temperatures, whereas ga/Pcon requires higher temperatures. The thermal energy requirement for transcription from preformed open complexes is the same for both promoters.

Factor-independent activation of Escherichia coli rRNA transcription. II. characterization of complexes of rrnB P1 promoters containing or lacking the upstream activator region with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

A region upstream from the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 promoter, the upstream activator region (UAR), increases the activity of the promoter in vivo and the rate of association with RNA polymerase (E sigma 70) in vitro in the presence of the two initiating nucleotides. We have used four types of chemical and enzymatic footprinting probes to determine whether rrnB P1-E sigma 70 complexes formed in the presence of the initiating nucleotides (RPinit) differ from typical open complexes (RPo) formed in the absence of the initiating nucleotides and to examine the structural differences between rrnB P1 complexes containing the UAR and those lacking the UAR. We find that the rrnB P1-RPinit complex closely resembles open complexes formed at other E sigma 70 promoters, indicating that the formation of the first phosphodiester bond does not result in a major rearrangement of the promoter-RNA polymerase complex. An unusual potassium permanganate modification at position -18 in both RPo and RPinit indicates the possible presence of a subtle difference in the -10, -35 spacer structure compared to some other E. coli promoters. We show that the E sigma 70-rrnB P1 complex formed with the promoter containing the UAR has DNase I and hydroxyl radical cleavage patterns in the -50 region different from those observed with the same promoter lacking the UAR. These results are interpreted to indicate that E sigma 70 may interact with a region further upstream from that contacted by RNA polymerase bound at most other promoters and/or that unusual structural properties of this region are induced by bound E sigma 70.

Synthetic DNA bending sequences increase the rate of in vitro transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli lac promoter

Appropriately phased DNA bending sequences replacing the CAP binding site upstream from the lac promoter increase by roughly tenfold the rate of specific transcription initiation from a superhelical promoter template in vitro; promoter occlusion results from polymerase binding to the upstream (dA)n.(dT)n tracts, but this phenomenon is not responsible for the observed phase-dependent transcriptional activity. The rates of open complex formation at both P1 and P2 promoters respond in a similar phase-dependent way to the synthetic curved DNA sequences.

Stringent spacing requirements for transcription activation by CRP

The cyclic AMP receptor protein-cAMP complex (CRP-cAMP) binds at a variety of distances upstream of several E. coli promoters and activates transcription. We have constructed a model system in which a consensus CRP binding site is placed at different distances upstream of the melR promoter. CRP-cAMP activates transcription from melR when bound at a number of positions, all of which lie on the same face of the DNA helix. The two distances at which transcription is strongly activated correspond exactly to those at which CRP-cAMP binds upstream of the well-studied galP1 and lac promoters. Footprinting of the synthetic promoters reveals that RNA polymerase makes identical contacts with their -10 regions even though CRP-cAMP binds at a different distance in each case. Kinetic analysis in vitro indicates that CRP-cAMP activates transcription from these promoters in similar but distinct ways. A model is proposed to explain this two-position activation.

The organization of open complexes between Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and DNA fragments carrying promoters either with or without consensus -35 region sequences

Transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli galP1 promoter does not depend on specific nucleotide sequences in the -35 region. Footprint analysis of transcriptionally competent complexes between E. coli RNA polymerase and DNA fragments carrying galP1 shows that RNA polymerase protects sequences as far upstream as -55, whereas sequences around the -35 region are exposed. In contrast, with galP1 derivatives carrying -35 region sequences resembling the consensus, RNA polymerase protects bases as far as -45, and the -35 region is fully protected. Taken together, our data suggest that the overall architecture of RNA polymerase-promoter complexes can vary according to whether or not consensus -35 region sequences are present; in the absence of these sequences, open complex formation requires distortion of the promoter DNA. However, the unwinding of promoter DNA around the transcription start is not affected by the nature of the -35 region sequence. With a galP1 derivative carrying point mutations in the spacer region that greatly reduce promoter activity, the protection of bases by RNA polymerase around the -10 sequence and transcription start site is reduced. In contrast, protection of the region upstream of -25 is unaffected by the spacer mutations, although sequences from -46 to -54 become hypersensitive to attack by potassium permanganate, indicating severe distortion or kinking of this zone. We suggest that, with this galP1 derivative, RNA polymerase is blocked in a complex that is an intermediate on the path to open complex formation.

Chemical and photochemical probing of DNA complexes

An overview of the chemical and photochemical probes which over the past ten years have been used in studies of DNA/ligand complexes and of non-B-form DNA conformations is presented with emphasis on the chemical reactions of the probes with DNA and on their present 'use-profile'. The chemical probes include: dimethyl sulfate, ethyl nitroso urea, diethyl pyrocarbonate, osmium tetroxide, permanganate, aldehydes, methidiumpropyl-EDTA-Fell (MPE), phenanthroline metal complexes and EDTA/FeII. The photochemical probes that have been used include: psoralens, UVB, acridines and uranyl salts. The biological systems analysed by use of these probes are reviewed by tabulation.

Recognition of nucleotide sequences at the Escherichia coli galactose operon P1 promoter by RNA polymerase

Specific nucleotide (nt) sequences in the -35 region are not essential for galP1 promoter activity, whereas nt sequences in the spacer region are needed for transcription initiation: a G:C base pair at nt -14 and sequences upstream from this position are necessary. In the absence of these sequences, transcription initiation is dependent on the insertion of oligodeoxyribonucleotides carrying -35 region consensus hexamer sequences. Additionally, for maximal promoter activity, specific sequences just upstream from nt -49 are required. Because galP1 carries no sequence resembling the -35 region consensus hexamer, we propose that recognition by RNA polymerase proceeds via an unusual mechanism involving contacts upstream from the -10 hexamer, distortion of the spacer region and a contact upstream from nt -49.

Identification and analysis of transcriptional regulatory signals for the kil and kor loci of Streptomyces plasmid pIJ101

Four regulated promoters that direct the transcription of genes (i.e., korA, tra, kilB, and korB) involved in the transfer of the Streptomyces plasmid pIJ101 were isolated following the in vitro fusion of plasmid DNA fragments to a promoterless gene encoding the S. lividans extracellular enzyme beta-galactosidase. Introduction of pIJ101 into cells carrying each of these promoter-lac fusions resulted in decreased lac expression. The sites of initiation of transcription by the promoter sequences were identified by primer extension experiments, and the DNA sequences specifically required for promoter activity and regulation by pIJ101-encoded functions were determined by deletion analysis. The data obtained indicate that the korB locus encodes a repressor that regulates its own transcription, as well as transcription of the kilB promoter; korA and tra are transcribed from overlapping divergent promoters that are coregulated by the korA gene product. Common DNA sequence domains within coregulated promoters allowed the identification of putative binding sites for each of the kor gene products.

Alterations in the binding site of the cyclic AMP receptor protein at the Escherichia coli galactose operon regulatory region

Gene manipulation techniques have been used to alter the binding site for the cyclic AMP-cyclic AMP receptor protein complex (cAMP-CRP) at the regulatory region of the Escherichia coli galactose (gal) operon. The effects of these changes on CRP-dependent stimulation of expression from the galP1 promoter in vivo have been measured, and gel binding assays have been used to measure the affinity of cAMP-CRP for the modified sites. Firstly we have deleted progressively longer sequences from upstream of the gal CRP site in order to locate the functional limit of the site. A deletion to -49, removing the first base that corresponds to the consensus sequence for a CRP binding site, is sufficient to reduce CRP binding and block CRP-dependent stimulation of P1. Secondly, we used synthetic oligonucleotides to invert the asymmetric nucleotide sequence at the gal CRP binding site or to make the sequence symmetric. Inversion of the site has little effect on CRP binding, the architecture of open complexes at P1 revealed by DNAase I footprinting, or the stimulation of transcription from P1. Making the site symmetric increases the affinity for CRP by over 50-fold and leads to increased transcription from P1, whilst hardly altering the DNAase I footprint of open complexes. Our results confirm that the strength of binding of CRP depends on the nature of the site and show that it is this that principally accounts for differences in CRP-dependent stimulation of transcription.

Far upstream sequences of the bla promoter from TN3 are involved in complexation with E. coli RNA-polymerase

The structure of the final initiation complex between E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) and the bla promoter from the transposon TN3 has been probed by footprinting experiments and base accessibility to dimethyl sulfate at 37 degrees C. At RNAP/promoter molar ratios "standard" for these experiments (greater than or equal to 10), the contacts on bla extend from -100 to +20, i.e. a length exceeding twice the dimension of the RNAP major axis [33]. Since footprinting at about equimolar amounts of RNAP and bla extends to the usual (-55 to +20) promoter domain, it is very likely that at least two RNAP's participate in the complex observed at tenfold higher RNAP/bla ratios. Under the latter conditions, the extended footprint (-100 to +20) is observed above 30 degrees C, whereas at 15 degrees C, only the -55 to +20 promoter area is contacted. Furthermore, gel retardation experiments show the presence of two complexes of different migration rates. We have reported earlier [21] that at the "standard" RNAP/bla ratio, transcription initiation from the bla promoter is inhibited. The correlation of this inhibition with the postulated two RNAP/bla complex suggests a regulation of bla gene expression by RNAP availability controlled for instance by growth rate. These results can be correlated with those reported in [14, 15] for the tyrT promoter. Interestingly, both promoter share significant sequence homologies.

Functional analysis of different sequence elements in the Escherichia coli galactose operon P2 promoter

Starting with a DNA fragment containing the galactose operon P2 promoter, we made a series of deletions that progressively replaced DNA sequences upstream of the transcription startpoint and determined their effects on P2 activity. The results show that specific sequences upstream of -32 are not important. Removal of the sequence 5'-CACA-3' from -32 to -28 reduces P2 activity by 50%: longer deletions to -16 further reduce activity but do not remove the information specifying the transcription startpoint. DNA sequences between -32 and -16 at gal P2 assist the isomerization of RNA polymerase from closed to open complexes rather than contributing to the initial binding of RNA polymerase. The activity of gal P2 in the absence of -35 region sequences is dependent on the sequence TG just upstream of the -10 hexamer, TATACT: a mutation at -14 changing the TG sequence to TT totally inactivates P2. However, P2 activity can be restored if the consensus -35 region sequence TTGACA is cloned 17 bp upstream of the -10 hexamer. Thus, for transcription initiation, the -10 hexamer, TATACT, must 'cooperate' with upstream sequences that may be located either around -35 or -14.

Studies with the Escherichia coli galactose operon regulatory region carrying a point mutation that simultaneously inactivates the two overlapping promoters. Interactions with RNA polymerase and the cyclic AMP receptor protein

We report in vitro studies of the interactions between purified E. coli RNA polymerase and DNA from the regulatory region of the E. coli galactose operon which carries a point mutation that simultaneously stops transcription initiation at the two normal start points, S1 and S2. In the presence of this point mutation, transcription initiates at a third start point 14/15 bp downstream of S1, showing that inactivation of the two normally active promoters, P1 and P2, unmasks a third weaker promoter, P3. Transcription initiation in the gal operon is normally regulated by the cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP, that binds to the gal regulatory region and switches transcription from P2 to P1. With the point mutation, CRP binding switches transcription from P3 to P1, although the formation of transcriptionally competent complexes at P1 is very slow. The results are discussed with respect to the mechanism of transcription activation by the CRP factor and the similarities between the regulatory regions of the galactose and lactose operons.