Wilderness emergency medical services: the experiences at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks

Search and Rescue in the Pacific West States

INTRODUCTION

The training practices and the level of medical oversight of search and rescue (SAR) organizations in the US National Park Service (NPS) Pacific west region is not known.

METHODS

A database of SAR teams in the NPS Pacific west region was assembled using public sources. SAR team leaders received an electronic survey between May and December 2019. A descriptive analysis characterizing team size, technical and medical training protocols, and medical oversight was completed. Results are reported as median (interquartile range, range).

RESULTS

Of the 250 SAR teams contacted, 39% (n=97) completed our survey. Annual mission volume was 25 (10-50, 1-200). Team size was 30 members (22-58, 1-405). SAR teams most frequently trained in helicopter operations (77%), low-angle rope rescue (75%), and avalanche rescue (43%). Nearly all teams (99%) had members with some medical training: first aid or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (89%), emergency medical technicians (75%), registered nurses or midlevel providers (52%), and physicians (40%). SAR members administered field medical care (84%), often in coordination with EMS (77%). Medical direction was present on a minority of teams (45%), most frequently by a provider specialized in emergency medicine (68%). Expanded medical procedures were permitted on 21% of SAR teams.

CONCLUSIONS

SAR teams across the NPS Pacific west region had composition and training standards similar to those surveyed previously in the US intermountain states. Healthcare professionals were present on most teams, typically as team members, not as medical directors. Few SAR teams use medical protocols in remote care environments.

Emergency Medical Services and Remote Medical Oversight in Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, 2011-2013

INTRODUCTION

The University of California San Francisco Fresno Department of Emergency Medicine provides base hospital support for the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI) emergency medical services (EMS) system. This descriptive epidemiologic study reports reasons the park EMS system is used and interventions provided, detailing the nature of patient encounters, type and frequency of injuries and interventions, reasons for base hospital contact, and patient dispositions.

METHODS

Patient charts for all EMS encounters in SEKI from 2011 to 2013 were included, and relevant data were extracted by a single reviewer.

RESULTS

Of the 704 charts reviewed, 570 (81%) were frontcountry patient encounters (within 1.6 km [1 mi] of a paved road); 100 (14%) were backcountry; and 34 (5%) occurred in undefined locations. Regarding sex and age, 58% of patients were men; 22% were younger than 18 y, and 15% were 65 y or older. More than 80% of calls occurred during the months of June through August. The most common complaints were extremity trauma (24%), torso trauma (13%), and lacerations (9%). Almost 50% of patients were transferred to a higher level of care. Medications were administered to 37% of patients, with oxygen being the most common. Procedures were performed 49% of the time, primarily intravenous access and splinting. Base hospital contact was made 38% of the time, most commonly (54%) for advice regarding disposition.

CONCLUSIONS

SEKI EMS providers encounter a wide variety of patients in various settings, including the backcountry. Resource allocation, training, and protocol development should be tailored to meet their needs.

Apostle Islands National Lakeshore: A Review of Search and Rescue and Emergency Medical Services Operations, 2006-2015

INTRODUCTION

Apostle Islands National Lakeshore (APIS) lies at the northern tip of Wisconsin and is home to a network of 21 islands along Lake Superior. The goal of this report is to investigate search and rescue (SAR) and emergency medical services (EMS) trends at APIS in an effort to improve visitor safety and resource allocation.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis reviewing APIS SAR reports and annual EMS summary reports from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015. Information related to incident type, incident date, individual demographic characteristics and activities, injury/illness type, cost, and contributing factors were recorded and analyzed in frequency tables.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2015, APIS SAR conducted 133 total missions assisting 261 individuals-200 not injured/ill, 57 injured/ill, and 4 fatalities. Median cost per SAR incident involving aircraft totaled $21,695 (range: $2,993-141,849), whereas incidents not involving aircraft had a median cost of $363 (range: $35-8,830). Nonmotorized boating was the most common activity resulting in SAR incidents. All 4 fatalities were attributed to drowning while kayaking or swimming. Cold-related injury/illness accounted for nearly half of all injuries/illnesses (45%) with the most commonly reported contributing factor being high winds. EMS responded to a total of 134 incidents. Trauma and first aid accounted for 43% and 34% of EMS workload, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study highlights the hazards associated with the frigid and rough conditions of Lake Superior. The reported results aim to help APIS personnel more saliently convey risks to visitors and plan appropriately in an effort to decrease the need for future rescues.

Mountain medical kits: epidemiology-based recommendations and analysis of medical supplies carried by mountain climbers in Colorado

OBJECTIVE

: To provide medical kit recommendations for short mountain wilderness recreation trips (hiking, trekking, backpacking, mountaineering etc.) based on the epidemiology of injury and illness sustained and best treatment guidelines. Additionally, to compare these recommendations to the medical kit contents of mountain climbers in Colorado.

METHODS

: A primary literature review concerning the epidemiology of injury and illness in mountain wilderness settings was performed. This information and literature on the efficacy of given treatments were used to derive recommendations for an evidence-based medical kit. The contents of 158 medical kits and the most likely demographics to carry them were compiled from surveys obtained from mountain climbers on 11 of Colorado's 14 000-foot peaks.

RESULTS

: Musculoskeletal trauma, strains, sprains and skin wounds were the most common medical issues reported in the 11 studies, which met inclusion criteria. Adhesive bandages (Band-Aids) were the most common item and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most common medication carried in medical kits in Colorado. More than 100 distinct items were reported overall.

CONCLUSION

: Mountain climbing epidemiology and current clinical guidelines suggest that a basic mountain medical kit should include items for body substance isolation, materials for immobilization, pain medications, wound care supplies, and medications for gastrointestinal upset and flu-like illness. The medical kits of Colorado mountain climbers varied considerable and often lacked essential items such as medical gloves. This suggests a need for increased guidance. Similar methodology could be used to inform medical kits for other outdoor activities, mountain rescue personnel, and travel to areas with limited formal medical care.

Wilderness medicine

BACKGROUND

Human activity in wilderness areas has increased globally in recent decades, leading to increased risk of injury and illness. Wilderness medicine has developed in response to both need and interest.

METHODS

The field of wilderness medicine encompasses many areas of interest. Some focus on special circumstances (such as avalanches) while others have a broader scope (such as trauma care). Several core areas of key interest within wilderness medicine are discussed in this study.

RESULTS

Wilderness medicine is characterized by remote and improvised care of patients with routine or exotic illnesses or trauma, limited resources and manpower, and delayed evacuation to definitive care. Wilderness medicine is developing rapidly and draws from the breadth of medical and surgical subspecialties as well as the technical fields of mountaineering, climbing, and diving. Research, epidemiology, and evidence-based guidelines are evolving. A hallmark of this field is injury prevention and risk mitigation. The range of topics encompasses high-altitude cerebral edema, decompression sickness, snake envenomation, lightning injury, extremity trauma, and gastroenteritis. Several professional societies, academic fellowships, and training organizations offer education and resources for laypeople and health care professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

THE FUTURE OF WILDERNESS MEDICINE IS UNFOLDING ON MULTIPLE FRONTS: education, research, training, technology, communications, and environment. Although wilderness medicine research is technically difficult to perform, it is essential to deepening our understanding of the contribution of specific techniques in achieving improvements in clinical outcomes.

Injuries Sustained at Yellowstone National Park Requiring Emergency Medical System Activation

OBJECTIVE

Outdoor-related activity has been on the rise in recent years, and hiking and backpacking are among those activities with the largest growth in participation. As the number of participants with varying experience increases, it is expected that there will be an increase in injuries related to these activities. Little empirical data exist related to outdoor injury types and rates. Our objectives were to determine incidence and frequency of injuries related to outdoor activity and requiring emergency medical system (EMS) activation at a national park.

METHODS

This retrospective study examines injuries within Yellowstone National Park. Subjects were selected from a database containing all EMS calls within Yellowstone National Park from calendar year 2003 through 2004. Data collected included age, gender, type of injury, location, activity at the time of injury, and EMS response.

RESULTS

There were 306 injuries reviewed. The mean age of patients was 40.9 years (SD: 23.0), and the group comprised 49.0% males. Emergency medical system transport was not required in 59.2% of injuries, and of those transported, 58.4% of patients required basic life support only. Of all injuries, 77.4% involved soft tissue, including lacerations. Hiking and walking accounted for 38.0% of all injuries, and 56.0% of those injuries involved the lower extremity. Only 8.8% of the injuries involved fractures and/or dislocations.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of EMS responses at a national park, the majority of injuries sustained were minor in nature. More than one third of injuries occurred while patients were hiking or walking, and most of those injuries involved the lower extremity. These results will help optimize resource planning in the national park setting.

Search and Rescue in Yosemite National Park: A 10-Year Review

OBJECTIVE

To describe the general characteristics and epidemiology of search and rescue (SAR) in Yosemite National Park (YNP) and identify possible areas for intervention directed at reduction in use of these services.

METHODS

Yosemite Search and Rescue (YOSAR) personnel record every search and rescue mission on a Search and Rescue Incident Report. The information contained in these reports was used to perform a retrospective review of all SAR missions within YNP during the 10-year study period between January 1990 and December 1999.

RESULTS

YOSAR performed 1912 SAR missions, assisting 2327 individuals and recording 2077 injuries and illnesses. Popular trails in and around Yosemite Valley collectively accounted for 25% of all individuals needing SAR services. Lower extremity injuries and dehydration/hypovolemia/hunger were commonly identified reasons to need SAR services. The duration of SAR missions averaged 5 hours, used 12 SAR personnel, and cost $4400. Helicopter was the primary mode of transport in 28% of SAR incidents. There were 112 fatalities, yielding a SAR case fatality rate of 4.8%. The majority of fatalities occurred while hiking/snowshoeing, with falling the most common mechanism of lethal injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Day-hikers in and around Yosemite Valley use a large portion of SAR services, with lower extremity injuries and dehydration/hypovolemia/hunger the most common reasons. It seems reasonable to direct future intervention to prevention of these commonly identified problems in this particular population of Park visitors.

Wilderness event medicine: planning for mass gatherings in remote areas

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of large recreational events are taking place in remote environments where medical care is far away. Such events include adventure races and large outdoor trips. Wilderness event medicine (WEM) has been previously defined as the healthcare response at any discrete event with more than 200 persons located more than 1h from hospital treatment. However, there is little literature describing the steps for providing medical care at such events.

METHODS

This article provides a framework for planning and executing WEM. It reviews the published data on wilderness injury and illness rates and describes the nature of injuries as they relate to specific activities. The article then discusses the three stages of WEM: pre-event planning, medical treatment at the event, and post-event tasks.

RESULTS

Wilderness events include myriad activities, including orienteering, mountain biking, mountaineering, and whitewater paddling. The injury and illness rates are in the range of 1-10 per 1000 person-days of exposure, with rates one order of magnitude greater for events which last many days, include extremes of environment (heat, altitude), or are competitive in nature. Professional adventure racers may present for medical evaluation at rates as high as 1000 encounters per 1000 racer-days. Injuries depend largely on activity. Illnesses are mostly gastrointestinal, 'flu-like' malaise, or related to the event environment, such as humidity or altitude. Providing medical care requires the proper staff, equipment, and contingency plans. The remoteness of these events mandates different protocols than would be used at an urban mass gathering.

CONCLUSIONS

WEM will likely continue to grow and evolve as a specialty. Additional reports from wilderness events, perhaps facilitated through a web-based incident reporting system, will allow medical providers to improve the quality of care given at remote events. Research into wilderness activity physiology will also be useful in understanding the prevention and treatment of injuries and illnesses encountered.

An introduction to wilderness medicine

As individuals increasingly recreate in wilderness settings, the medical community is faced with increasing numbers of injuries and illnesses occurring in remote and austere locations. In response to this, the specialized and dynamic field of wilderness medicine has developed to care for and counsel those participating in wilderness pursuits. This article adds clarity to the definition of wilderness medicine and examines the current state of wilderness medicine, including the scope of practice in the United States.

Wilderness emergency medical services systems

Wilderness emergency medical services (WEMS) systems have components and requirements that are different from those of traditional EMS systems. These differences arise from the extremes of time and environmental exposure and the limited available resources that help define the wilderness environment. Although disaster systems combine wilderness and traditional EMS system components, most WEMS systems have had to develop independently on a localized level and in response to the need of a particular community or location. In many cases, volunteers provide much of the personnel and resources available to law enforcement agencies that are ultimately tasked with the responsibility of oversight for effecting rescues in a wilderness setting.

A seven-year experience in expedition medicine: the Juneau Icefield Research Program

There have been relatively few attempts to document the optimal medical support for wilderness expeditions, and none of these previous reports includes physician-level providers. Here we document our experience with physician-level medical support to an annual wilderness expedition in Alaska. This report utilizes data collected from 1994 to 2000 as part of the medical response to the Juneau Icefield Research Project, an annual research expedition to the Alaskan wilderness involving up to 60 students and professors. Medical supplies and equipment were catalogued, and 7 years of medical logs were reviewed with data presented in descriptive fashion. The majority of diseases encountered included gastrointestinal illness, minor orthopedic injuries, urinary tract infections, illness related to sun exposure, and kidney stones. Several patients required evacuation by helicopter to the nearest medical facility. The logistical challenges of medical treatment in this setting are discussed.

Wilderness medicine

Wilderness medicine is not a single entity. It encompasses clinical practice, instruction, and research as they pertain to wilderness settings. Clinical practice often takes place in removed settings far from traditional medical resources and facilities. Many of the conditions treated are unique to wilderness medicine. Decisions commonly are based on limited information. Practitioners of wilderness medicine must combine specialized training, resourcefulness, and improvisation. Instruction and research in wilderness medicine often are directed at clinical practice, with the focus on maximizing patient outcome. Preparation and planning are the best methods of reducing illness and injury; these involve conditioning and choosing clothing and equipment, including the medical kit. Conditioning should mimic the type of trip or activity, because choice will depend on the type, complexity, and duration of the trip, the anticipated environmental conditions, and specific needs of the group. Equipment should be designed for the type of activity, in good working condition, and familiar to the members of the group. The medical kit should include basic medical supplies, with additional supplies and equipment depending on the specific trip, the anticipated needs of the group, and their level of medical training and expertise. Once in the wilderness, the focus shifts from preparation and planning to prevention of illness and injury. This includes the use of safety equipment, appropriate shelter, water treatment, and location knowledge. The most common methods of water treatment are mechanical filters, chemicals, and heat. When an injury or illness does occur in the wilderness, proper assessment of the patient is essential to determine both the appropriate treatment and the need for evacuation to definitive care. This is best accomplished with an organized, systematic approach. The decision of what treatment should be initiated and if the patient requires evacuation to definitive care often is difficult. There are four phases of an SAR event: location, access, stabilization, and evacuation. Evacuation may require the assistance of organized search and rescue services.

Feasibility of paramedic treatment and referral of minor illnesses and injuries

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% of Hennepin County Medical Center's (HCMC's) ambulance runs are for minor medical conditions as defined by billing criteria ["ALS minor," i.e., no advanced life support (ALS) procedures done in the field]. Current metropolitan guidelines mandate that all such patients must be transported to a hospital unless they refuse this service. It has been proposed that some patients with minor medical conditions could be better served by treatment in the field by paramedics and referred to a clinic or hospital for early follow-up care. It is proposed that this approach would save costs and improve paramedic availability for patients with more serious conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of implementing such a program by identifying high-volume, low-complexity groupings of cases. Such high-volume, low-complexity cases would serve as the topics for curriculum development for paramedic training in field treatment and referral.

METHODS

Data were obtained from ambulance run sheets and emergency department (ED) records for all patients transported by the HCMC ambulance service in 1996 who were covered by the Metropolitan Health Plan (MHP) and who were categorized for billing purposes as "ALS minor" transports. The data included demographic information, vital signs, presenting problem, diagnoses in the ED, and procedures, laboratory studies, or x-rays done in the ED. Patients were classified as "potentially treatable" in the field if they were treated and discharged from the ED without undergoing any procedures or diagnostic studies. Patients who required more extensive evaluation in the ED, or who were admitted, were classified as likely too "complex" to be treated at the scene and then referred for early follow-up. The data were analyzed to find the most common presenting problems and the numbers, characteristics, and dispositions of "potentially treatable" and "complex" patients in each group. This information was used to determine what, if any, types of patients could potentially be treated safely and effectively according to this scheme.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 1,103 patients, representing 127 different presenting medical problems. There were 523 (47%) "potentially treatable" patients and 580 (53%) "complex" patients. The 127 medical problems were grouped and the 15 most common presenting problem groups were identified. Within these groups there was no single medical problem with high volume. Each of these 15 most common problem groups contained a substantial proportion of "complex" patients, ranging from 24% to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the 15 most frequently encountered problem groups consisted of a high enough proportion of "potentially treatable" cases to serve as a high-volume, low-complexity category for paramedic treatment in the field with early follow-up. Without any identified high-volume, low-complexity categories, a treatment and referral program as proposed in this article would require a substantial investment in development of appropriate criteria and in training paramedics to apply the criteria for numerous clinical entities. This would limit any cost saving, and require great care to avoid compromising patient safety accompanied by substantial professional liability exposure.

Wilderness mortalities: a 13-year experience

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To analyze the epidemiology of wilderness mortalities in a localized area with diverse terrain.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of the Pima County (Arizona) Sheriff's Office (PCSO) search and rescue logs and case reports, hospital records, and autopsy reports for all wilderness deaths from 1980 to 1992. The study group comprised all victims of injury or illness in Pima County wilderness who died during a 13-year period in a location remote enough so that standard ground-based emergency medical services units could not extract the body.

RESULTS

One hundred fatalities occurred during the 13-year study period. There were 59 unintentional traumas, 18 suicides, 9 homicides, 12 medically related deaths, and 2 deaths of unknown causes. Toxicology tests performed on body fluids yielded positive findings for alcohol in a total of 50 (50%) cases and positive findings for drugs of abuse in 12 (12%) cases. It was estimated that alcohol was "a very probable" or "a probable" causative factor in 23 (40%) of the 59 unintentional trauma deaths, and in 1 (8.3%) of the 12 medically related deaths. Fifty-five (55%) deaths were witnessed events, with 45 (80%) of these victims reported as dying immediately or before arrival of search and rescue personnel. Ten (10%) victims received resuscitation in the field, and according to a review of hospital charts and autopsy reports, only 2 victims had a potentially survivable injury or illness.

CONCLUSION

Many wilderness mortalities are related to incidents involving alcohol. Once the accident or injury has occurred, the majority of deaths are immediate, or at least before the arrival of medical personnel. Higher levels of medical care would not have improved the outcomes of those who did survive long enough to receive medical care. Therefore, primary efforts to reduce mortalities in the wilderness should be directed toward prevention, especially diminishing alcohol use in wilderness areas.

The perceived importance of paramedic skills and the emphasis they receive during EMS education programs

OBJECTIVE

The National Standard Curriculum for paramedics is currently being revised. There is little scientific evidence of what does and what does not work in prehospital care, and of whether the National Standard Curriculum prepares paramedics for the field. To provide some basis for the current revisions to the National Standard Curriculum, the authors determined which prehospital skills are perceived by paramedics to be the most important, and whether the emphasis placed on those skills during initial and continuing education programs corresponds with the perceived importance.

METHODS

Surveys listing 21 paramedic skills were mailed to the directors of 41 EMS agencies who agreed to participate in the study. The directors distributed the surveys to 1,364 paramedics affiliated with their organizations. The participants were asked to rate the importance of each skill, and the emphasis placed on each skill during their initial and continuing education. Skills were ranked on a scale of 0 to 4, with 0 representing no importance or emphasis, and 4 representing the most possible importance or emphasis.

RESULTS

Six-hundred of the 1,364 (44%) surveys were returned. Respondents had a mean of 9.9 +/- 5.6 years of EMS experience, and 5.4 +/- 4.0 years of experience as paramedics. The three skills ranked highest in importance were: 1) endotracheal intubation; 2) defibrillation; and 3) assessment. Importance in prehospital care was ranked equal to or higher than emphasis in both initial and continuing education for all skills except splinting and urinary catheterization, which received higher rankings for emphasis in initial education. Emphasis in initial education equaled or exceeded the emphasis in continuing education for all skills except intraosseous infusion.

CONCLUSION

The perceived importance of most prehospital skills is very high, and exceeds the emphasis placed on those skills during both initial and continuing education programs. These findings have implications for medical directors, EMS instructors, and persons involved with the revision of the National Standard Curriculum.

EMS knowledge and skills in rural North Carolina: a comparison with the National EMS Education and Practice Blueprint

INTRODUCTION

Many state and local emergency medical services (EMS) systems may wish to modify provider levels and their scope of practice to align their systems with the recommendations of the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint. To determine any changes that may be needed in a typical EMS system, the knowledge and skills of EMS providers in one rural area of North Carolina were compared with the knowledge and skills recommended in the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint.

METHODS

A survey listing 175 items of patient care-oriented knowledge and skills described in the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint was developed. EMS providers from five rural eastern North Carolina counties were asked to identify on the survey those items of knowledge and skills they believed they possessed. The skills and knowledge selected by the respondents at the five different North Carolina levels of certification were compared with the knowledge and skills listed for comparable provider levels delineated by the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint. The proportions of the recommended skills reported to be possessed by the respondents were compared to determine which North Carolina certification levels best correlate with the Blueprint.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five EMS providers completed the survey. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) ranked significantly lower than did the skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in five of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Defibrillator-level personnel ranked lower than did those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in seven of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Intermediates ranked lower than did those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in nine of the 10 Blueprint elements. The proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Advanced Intermediates ranked lower than were the skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in two of the 10 Blueprint elements. Finally, the proportion of recommended skills and knowledge reported to be possessed by EMT-Paramedics ranked lower than were those reported to be possessed by respondents at other levels in one of the 10 Blueprint elements.

CONCLUSION

In North Carolina, combining the EMT and EMT-Defibrillator levels and eliminating the EMT-Intermediate level would create three levels of certification, which would be more consistent with levels recommended by the Blueprint. The results of this study should be considered in any effort to revise the levels of EMS certification in North Carolina and in planning the training curricula for bridging those levels. Other states may require similar action to align with the National Emergency Medical Services Education and Practice Blueprint.