Acid pump blockers: what are their current therapeutic roles?

Pharmacological Management of Spasticity in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Cerebral palsy (CP), a nonprogressive disease of the central nervous system, is the most common motor disability in childhood. Patients with CP often have a multitude of associated comorbidities, including impact on muscle tone. There are four main types of CP, with spastic as the most commonly diagnosed. Reduction in spasticity is important because it can affect not only the patient's quality of life, functional abilities, and well-being but also the lives of caregivers. The American Academy of Neurology and Child Neurology Society released a practice parameter regarding the pharmacological management of CP-related spasticity in 2010. Since then, data have been published evaluating the safety and efficacy of oral and parenteral medications to manage spasticity. This continuing education review evaluates the available safety and efficacy evidence for oral and parenteral pharmacological agents used to reduce spasticity in children with CP and provides a reference for practitioners managing these patients.

Current Status of Gastric Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Treatment of Acid-Peptic Disease

Proton pump inhibitors represent an important advance in the treatment of acid-peptic disease. Omeprazole, the prototype of the drug class, produces a profound and sustained degree of gastric acid suppression. Recent studies confirm earlier reports that omeprazole 20 mg/d is generally more effective than standard histamine2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) dosage regimens in treating duodenal ulcer (DU), gastric ulcer (GU), and erosive esophagitis. Omeprazole tends to accelerate DU and GU healing, especially during the first 2 weeks of treatment, and also accelerates mucosal healing in patients with all grades of esophagitis. Omeprazole is the drug of choice for treating patients with large or refractory ulcers, severe or refractory erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Maintenance therapy with omeprazole seems to reduce ulcer recurrence and esophagitis, but optimal treatment regimens must be established. Dual therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin shows encouraging results in eradicating Helicobacter pylori, reducing duodenal ulcer recurrence rates, and altering the natural history of peptic ulcer disease. Further studies are required to determine the efficacy of omeprazole in preventing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcers and stress-related mucosal bleeding, and in treating upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Omeprazole is well-tolerated in the majority of patients receiving either short-term or long-term treatment. The type and frequency of adverse effects are similar to those reported with the H2RAs. There is no evidence to support genotoxicity or hypergastrinemia-induced enterochromaffin-like cell carcinoid of the stomach in patients receiving omeprazole treatment for more than 5 years. Omeprazole interacts selectively with hepatic P-450 and may potentially interact with phenytoin, warfarin, or diazepam. Pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that treatment with omeprazole provides a significant cost-savings over the H2RAs in patients with moderate to severe erosive esophagitis and possibly in patients with DU. Lansoprazole, a newly developed proton pump inhibitor, seems to offer no clear advantage over omeprazole.

Acceptability of a paste formulation and efficacy of high dose omeprazole in healing gastric ulcers in horses maintained in race training

Gastric ulceration has been found to occur in 80-90% of Thoroughbreds in active race training. Previously, variable success has been reported using mucosal surface protectants and H2 receptor antagonist. Omeprazole, a substituted benzimidazole, has been shown to inhibit gastric acid secretion in both man and animals. Fourteen horses, in active race training and with endoscopic evidence of moderated to severe gastric ulceration were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (7 horses) were given placebo paste orally once daily for 28 days; Group 2 (7 horses) received 1.54 g active omeprazole in the placebo once daily for 28 days. Logs detailing administration and acceptability of the paste, and the horse's feeding and training regime were maintained by the trainer of each horse. Endoscopic examination of the stomach occurred at the beginning of the trial, and at 13-17 days and 27-31 days following commencement of the trial. Those horses that were free of ulceration on Days 27-31 were reexamined on Days 35-49. Acceptability of the paste, whether with or without active omeprazole, was deemed excellent in all horses except on one occasion, when one horse swallowed the paste following initial mild reluctance. Of the horses given the placebo (Group 1), 3 were withdrawn after the 13-17 day endoscopic examination: 1 horse to be given a H2 receptor antagonist, 1 horse was removed from training due to aryepiglottic entrapment and 1 horse had a greater than 10% fall in bodyweight from the start of the trial. Of the horses given active omeprazole (Group 2), one horses was relocated to another race track following the 13-17 day endoscopic examination. For the horses given placebo (Group 1), there was no change in the severity of ulceration. In contrast, the severity of ulceration in the horses given active omeprazole was significantly reduced at 13-17 days and 27-31 days. In 2 Group 2 horses, ulcers that had been completely eliminated subsequently returned when reexamined at 35-49 days. The results of this study suggest that omeprazole, employing a once daily dosing schedule, is effective at reducing the severity or eliminating gastric ulcers in Thoroughbreds in active race training.

Omeprazole produces parietal cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia in humans

While there is evidence that omeprazole may induce changes in parietal cells, the effect of acid suppression on parietal cells in humans is poorly documented. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of omeprazole in human parietal cells over time. The light microscopic morphology of parietal cells in gastric biopsies from 17 patients on omeprazole were compared with those from 13 patients on ranitidine and 20 patients on no acid-lowering medication. Light microscopic and ultrastructural morphology of parietal cells was also evaluated in an additional 14 patients before and after omeprazole administration. Objective measurements of parietal cell height, mass and number were analyzed using analyses of variance. Electron microscopy was used to evaluate parietal cell enlargement. Twenty-five of 31 biopsies from patients on omeprazole, 1 of 13 from patients on ranitidine, and 0 of 20 from patients on neither drug showed parietal cell enlargement. Parietal cell height, mass, and number were increased in omeprazole-treated patients compared with ranitidine-treated patients and those on neither drug, and with the group also evaluated prior to beginning omeprazole treatment. Parietal cell height and mass were increased in patients on omeprazole longer than 12 months compared with biopsies from patients on the drug for less than 12 months. Resin-embedded sections and electron microscopy showed enlarged parietal cells with prominence of cytoplasmic tubulovesicles with sparse secretory canaliculi. Parietal cell hypertrophy and hyperplasia develops in patients on chronic omeprazole therapy; this can be recognized on routine examination of histologic sections. These morphologic changes increase with duration of therapy.