Carboplatin as second line treatment for recurrent or progressive brain metastases from small cell lung cancer

Treatment and Prevention of Brain Metastases in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis will develop in 50% of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients throughout disease course. Development of CNS metastasis poses a particular treatment dilemma due to the accompanied cognitive changes, poor permeability of the blood-brain barrier to systemic therapy and relatively advanced state of disease. Survival of patients with untreated SCLC brain metastases is generally <3 months with whole brain radiotherapy used as first-line management in most SCLC patients. To prevent development of CNS metastasis prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is recommended in limited stage disease, after response to chemotherapy and radiation, while PCI may be considered in extensive stage disease after favorable response to upfront treatment. Neurocognitive toxicity with whole brain radiotherapy and PCI is a concern and remains difficult to predict. The mechanism of toxicity is likely multifactorial, but a potential mechanism of injury to the hippocampus has led to hippocampal sparing radiation techniques. Treatment of established non-small cell lung cancer CNS metastases has increasingly focused on using stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS) and it is tempting to extrapolate these results to SCLC. In this review, we explore the evidence surrounding the prediction, prevention, detection, and treatment of CNS metastases in SCLC. We further review whether existing evidence supports extrapolating less toxic treatments to SCLC patients with CNS metastases and discuss trials that may shed more light on this question.

Should Stereotactic Radiosurgery Be Considered for Salvage of Intracranial Recurrence after Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation or Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Population-Based Analysis and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) improves survival and prevents intracranial recurrence (IR) in limited stage (LS) and extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, despite PCI, IR affects 12%-45%, and limited data exist regarding salvage brain reirradiation (ReRT). We performed a population-based review of IR in SCLC.

METHODS

Demographic, treatment, and outcome data of consecutive patients (N = 371) with SCLC assessed at a tertiary cancer centre (01/2013-12/2015) were abstracted, and summary statistics calculated. Kaplan-Meier estimates and univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) via the Cox proportional hazard model were performed.

RESULTS

Median age was 66.1 years, and 59.8% were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. Median survival was 24 months (95% CI 18.3-29.7 months) for LS (N = 103) and 7 months (95% CI 6.1-7.9 months) for ES (N = 268). 72 of 103 patients with LS and 97 of 214 of those with ES received PCI. 54 of 268 ES presented with brain metastases (BM) of whom 46 of 54 received whole brain RT (WBRT). 18.9% (32/169) recurred post-PCI (13 LS; 19 ES) and 30.4% (14/46) recurred after WBRT. Of those who recurred/progressed after cranial RT, 56.5% (26/46) had <5 BM, 39.1% had no extracranial disease, and 50% were ECOG 0-2. In retrospect, 17 of 46 would have been candidates for salvage stereotactic radiosurgery: 13 post-PCI and 4 post-WBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort challenges commonly held beliefs that IR is always diffuse, associated with clinical deterioration, and synchronous with systemic failure. Approximately 1 in 3 SCLC patients with IR after PCI or WBRT appear clinically appropriate for salvage stereotactic radiosurgery.

Leptomeningeal Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment options for leptomeningeal metastases are expanding with greater tolerability and efficacy than in the past. Improved knowledge of molecular subtypes of some cancers can guide in choosing more effective therapeutic options; however, physicians should be mindful that these molecular types can be different in the central nervous system compared to the rest of the body. This is particularly true in breast and lung cancer, in which some patients now can live for many months or even years after diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases. Options for intrathecal therapies are expanding, but physicians should be mindful that this is a passive delivery system that relies on normal CSF flow, so therapies will not penetrate bulky or parenchymal disease sites, especially in the presence of abnormal CSF flow. When chemotherapeutic options are lacking or unsuccessful, focal radiosurgery which can provide symptomatic relief and proton craniospinal radiation remain effective options. Hopefully more formal studies will be conducted in the future to verify which treatments are indeed most effective for particular types of cancer.

Systemic therapy for brain metastases

Central nervous system metastases cause grave morbidity in patients with advanced malignancies. Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the three most common causes of brain metastases. Although the exact incidence of brain metastases is unclear, there appears to be an increasing incidence which has been attributed to longer survival, better control of systemic disease, and better imaging modalities. Until recently surgical resection of solitary or symptomatic brain metastases, and radiation therapy (either whole-brain radiation therapy or stereotactic radiation) were the mainstay of treatment for patients with brain metastases. The majority of traditional chemotherapies have shown limited activity in the central nervous system, which has been attributed to the blood-brain barrier and the molecular structure of the used agents. The discovery of driver mutations and drugs targeting these mutations has changed the treatment landscape. Several of these targeted small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors do cross the blood-brain barrier and/or have shown activity in the central nervous system. Another major advance in the care of brain metastases has been the advent of new immunotherapeutic agents, for which initial studies have shown intracranial activity. In this chapter, we will review the unique challenges in the treatment of brain metastases. The pertinent clinical studies of chemotherapy in brain metastases will be discussed. The currently reported clinical trials and evidence for use of targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic agents will be emphasized.

Targeted drugs for systemic therapy of lung cancer with brain metastases

Brain metastases are very common in lung cancer patients. The condition of these patients is complicated and difficult to treat, and adverse reactions following treatment can affect the nervous system, which severely reduces quality of life. Lung cancers are categorized as small cell lung cancers and non-small cell lung cancers. Patients with brain metastasis of small cell lung cancers are generally treated with brain radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy, but stage III/IV patients with brain metastasis of non-small cell lung cancers are generally not responsive to radiotherapy or chemotherapy. With the recent development of targeted drugs, tumor molecular profile detection allows the selection of appropriate targeted drugs for adjuvant pharmacological treatment of brain metastasis in lung cancer patients. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged and have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of certain cancers, but their efficacy in lung cancer patients with brain metastases still needs to be confirmed. This paper focuses on highlighting drugs for targeted therapy of brain metastasis in lung cancer patients and their molecular targets and mechanisms of drug resistance.

Systemic Treatment of Brain Metastases

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Brain metastases are a significant problem in patients with lung cancer and have conventionally been treated with whole-brain radiation. This article reviews the data for systemic chemotherapy to treat brain metastasis from lung cancer and examines the activity of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the targeted therapy for brain metastases from EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. Future directions for evaluating the role of immunotherapy in treating brain metastasis are also discussed.

Surgery of recurrent brain metastases: retrospective analysis of 67 patients

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastasis is one of the major challenges in neurooncology. Commonly, WBRT was applied after or as the initial treatment. Many patients received radiosurgery or their lesions were operated on. The question arises of what treatment modalities are appropriate and can be offered to the patients. In our retrospective analysis, we evaluated whether re-operation might be a useful measurement for the patients with respect to overall survival and quality of life.

METHODS

We included 67 patients who were treated between 1993 and 2008 in our department. The median age was 59 years. Metastases of 11 different primaries were diagnosed. The median OST was 7.5 months.

RESULTS

Statistically significant prognostic factors for OS were single lesions, completeness of resection, and time to recurrence, which was significantly influenced by WBRT after first operation. The one year survival rate correlated with the RPA classification: class I: 53.3 %, class II: 26.9 %, class III: 12.5 %. In 31.3 %, a second recurrence occurred which was treated by repeated surgery. Six patients survived as long-term survivors (25.7-132.2 months).

CONCLUSION

Surgery of recurrent brain metastasis is an important therapeutic option. A subgroup of patients, defined by prognostic factors, will profit with improvement of symptoms and prolongation of the overall survival time. Even long-term survivors can be expected.

Treatment options for small cell lung cancer - do we have more choice?

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a significant health problem worldwide because of its high propensity for relapse. This review discusses existing and future therapies for the treatment of SCLC.

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics of topotecan in a phase I trial of topotecan, tamoxifen, and carboplatin, in the treatment of recurrent or refractory brain or spinal cord tumors

PURPOSE

This study was designed to ascertain the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximally tolerated doses of the combination of fixed-dose tamoxifen and carboplatin, with escalating doses of topotecan, and to determine the pharmacokinetics of topotecan in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

METHODS

Tamoxifen 100 mg po bid, topotecan 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 mg/m(2)/d IV, administered as a 72 h continuous infusion on days 1-3, followed by carboplatin AUC = 3, IV on day 3. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients received 39 cycles of treatment: median 2, (range 1-5). The tumors included glioblastoma (6), anaplastic astrocytoma (2), metastatic non-small cell (3), small cell lung (2), and one each with medulloblastoma, ependymoma, and metastatic breast or colon carcinoma. The median Karnofsky performance status was 70% (range 60-90%) and age: 52 (range 24-75). Eleven patients were female and six male. Toxicities included thrombocytopenia (2), neutropenia without fever lasting 6 days (1), DVT (2), and emesis (1). Topotecan levels, total and lactone, were measured prior to the end of infusion in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). At 1.0 mg/m(2)/d, the median CSF/plasma ratio was 19.4% (range 15.1-59.1%). The total plasma topotecan in two pts with DLTs was 4.63 and 5.87 ng/ml, in three without DLTs at the same dose level the mean total plasma topotecan was 3.4 ng/ml (range 3.02-3.83). Plasma lactone levels were 33% of the total; CSF penetration was 20% of the total plasma levels. 4/8 pts with high-grade gliomas had stable disease (median: 3 cycles (range 2-5)). Two had minor responses. One patient with metastatic non-small cell and one with small cell lung cancer had objective PRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II doses are: tamoxifen 100 mg po bid, topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2)/d IV continuous infusion for 72 h, followed by carboplatin AUC = 3 IV on day 3. Measurable topotecan levels, both total and lactone, are observed in the CSF.

The role of retreatment in the management of recurrent/progressive brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline

QUESTION

What evidence is available regarding the use of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), surgical resection or chemotherapy for the treatment of recurrent/progressive brain metastases?

TARGET POPULATION

This recommendation applies to adults with recurrent/progressive brain metastases who have previously been treated with WBRT, surgical resection and/or radiosurgery. Recurrent/progressive brain metastases are defined as metastases that recur/progress anywhere in the brain (original and/or non-original sites) after initial therapy.

RECOMMENDATION

Level 3 Since there is insufficient evidence to make definitive treatment recommendations in patients with recurrent/progressive brain metastases, treatment should be individualized based on a patient's functional status, extent of disease, volume/number of metastases, recurrence or progression at original versus non-original site, previous treatment and type of primary cancer, and enrollment in clinical trials is encouraged. In this context, the following can be recommended depending on a patient's specific condition: no further treatment (supportive care), re-irradiation (either WBRT and/or SRS), surgical excision or, to a lesser extent, chemotherapy. Question If WBRT is used in the setting of recurrent/progressive brain metastases, what impact does tumor histopathology have on treatment outcomes? No studies were identified that met the eligibility criteria for this question.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: short-term health-related quality of life and patient reported symptoms: results of an international Phase III randomized controlled trial by the EORTC Radiation Oncology and Lung Cancer Groups

PURPOSE

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) leads to significantly fewer symptomatic brain metastases and improved survival. Detailed effects of PCI on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are reported here.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (age, 18 to 75 years; WHO < or = 2) with ED-SCLC, and any response to chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to either observation or PCI. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient-reported symptoms were secondary end points. The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer core HRQOL tool (Quality of Life Questionnaire C30) and brain module (Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain Cancer Module) were used to collect self-reported patient data. Six HRQOL scales were selected as primary HRQOL end points: global health status; hair loss; fatigue; and role, cognitive and emotional functioning. Assessments were performed at random assignment, 6 weeks, 3 months, and then 3-monthly up to 1 year and 6-monthly thereafter.

RESULTS

Compliance with the HRQOL assessment was 93.7% at baseline and dropped to 60% at 6 weeks. Short-term results up to 3 months showed that there was a negative impact of PCI on selected HRQOL scales. The largest mean difference between the two arms was observed for fatigue and hair loss. The impact of PCI on global health status as well as on functioning scores was more limited. For global health status, the observed mean difference was eight points on a scale 0 to 100 at 6 weeks (P = .018) and 3 months (P = .055).

CONCLUSION

PCI should be offered to all responding ED SCLC patients. Patients should be informed of the potential adverse effects from PCI. Clinicians should be alert to these; monitor their patients; and offer appropriate support, clinical, and psychosocial care.

Chemotherapy for brain metastases in small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Brain metastasis occurs commonly in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Herein, we report the efficacy of irinotecan and carboplatin in the treatment of brain metastases from SCLC. In addition, we review the existing data on chemotherapy for brain metastases in SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty patients with metastatic or relapsed SCLC were enrolled in a phase II trial of irinotecan and carboplatin. Patients naive to chemotherapy were treated with irinotecan 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC of 5, and patients previously treated with chemotherapy received irinotecan 150 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC of 5, every 21 days for 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Among the 80 patients, 15 (19%) presented with brain metastases. An analysis of 14 assessable patients with brain metastases revealed an overall response rate of 65% after 2 cycles of chemotherapy and a median survival of 6 months (range, 1-24 months). Upon review of the literature, 8 studies were identified as having > 10 patients who received chemotherapy for brain metastases from SCLC. Based on these studies, the response rate of brain metastases from SCLC to a variety of chemotherapy and median survival of patients ranged from 22% to 85% and 3 months to 9 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy, including the regimen of irinotecan and carboplatin, is an effective treatment for SCLC brain metastases.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a randomized trial of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer who had had a response to chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with extensive small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to undergo prophylactic cranial irradiation (irradiation group) or receive no further therapy (control group). The primary end point was the time to symptomatic brain metastases. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was performed when any predefined key symptom suggestive of brain metastases was present.

RESULTS

The two groups (each with 143 patients) were well balanced regarding baseline characteristics. Patients in the irradiation group had a lower risk of symptomatic brain metastases (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.44; P<0.001). The cumulative risk of brain metastases within 1 year was 14.6% in the irradiation group (95% CI, 8.3 to 20.9) and 40.4% in the control group (95% CI, 32.1 to 48.6). Irradiation was associated with an increase in median disease-free survival from 12.0 weeks to 14.7 weeks and in median overall survival from 5.4 months to 6.7 months after randomization. The 1-year survival rate was 27.1% (95% CI, 19.4 to 35.5) in the irradiation group and 13.3% (95% CI, 8.1 to 19.9) in the control group. Irradiation had side effects but did not have a clinically significant effect on global health status.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the incidence of symptomatic brain metastases and prolongs disease-free and overall survival. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00016211 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

The pathogenesis and treatment of brain metastases: a comprehensive review

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and their incidence is increasing. Untreated brain metastases are associated with a poor prognosis and a poor performance status. The role of surgery in the management of multiple brain metastases is still controversial. As more than 70% of patients have multiple metastases at the time of diagnosis, whole brain radiotherapy is the treatment of choice in most cases. Brain metastases are an ideal target for stereotactic radiosurgery, as they are better circumscribed than primary brain tumors. Currently, chemotherapy has a limited role in the treatment of most brain metastases. Several new therapies, with a good penetration through the blood brain barrier, such as temozolomide, have been used in brain metastases with different results depending on the histology of the primary tumor. A better understanding of the complex processes underlying the development of brain metastasis will enable us to develop more satisfactory targeted treatments.

CNS Metastases in Breast Cancer

As systemic therapy of metastatic breast cancer improves, CNS involvement is becoming a more widespread problem. This article summarizes the current knowledge regarding the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of CNS metastases in patients with breast cancer. When available, studies specific to breast cancer are presented; in studies in which many solid tumors were evaluated together, the proportion of patients with breast cancer is noted. On the basis of data from randomized trials and retrospective series, neurosurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may prolong survival in patients with single brain metastases. The treatment of multiple metastases remains controversial, as does the routine use of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) after either surgery or SRS. Although it is widely assumed that chemotherapy is of limited benefit, data from case series and case reports suggest otherwise. WBRT, neurosurgery, SRS, and medical therapy each have a role in the treatment of CNS metastases; however, neurologic symptoms frequently are not fully reversible, even with appropriate therapy. Studies specifically targeted toward this group of patients are needed.

Treatment of brain metastases from lung cancer: chemotherapy

Brain metastases are a frequent complication in patients suffering from Lung cancer, and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Brain metastases are found in about 10% of patients at the time of diagnosis, and approximately 40% of all patients with lung cancer develop brain metastases during the course of their disease. The prognosis of these patients is rather poor. The standard treatment for brain metastases, so far, has been whole-brain radiation therapy and surgery focussing on symptom palliation. The use of chemotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases has been limited because of a presumed lack of effectiveness due to the blood-brain barrier. However, the importance of the blood-brain barrier is probably overrated in the case of macroscopic metastases or relapsed disease as the blood-brain barrier has already been disrupted at this stage resulting from the newly developed blood vessels not provided with the physiological properties of the common blood-brain barrier. Chemotherapeutic agents initially lipid-insoluble or liquor-impermeable can also penetrate into the brain and, therefore, trigger action against tumour cells. A number of clinical trials have demonstrated that brain metastases resulting from both small-cell lung cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer are susceptible to systemic chemotherapy. In small-cell lung cancer, cerebral response rates up to 50% were observed even in the second-line situation and were comparable to the response rates observed in the primary tumour. In non-small-cell lung cancer, similar results were achieved. Therefore, it seems justified to further evaluate the significance of chemotherapy compared to whole-brain radiation therapy. Whether chemotherapy alone is superior to whole-brain radiation therapy, or whether the combination of both therapeutic modalities should be preferred for the management of brain metastases, has not yet been proven, and further randomised phase-III studies are clearly needed. Based on the current available data, and the promising response rates in patients with lung cancer, chemotherapy should be considered for the management of brain metastases as part of a multimodality (or "interdisciplinary") treatment concept.

Second-line chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a review

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy, and only a minority of patients survive 2 years. Although this cancer is sensitive to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the majority of patients relapse, and second-line treatment is an option for many. Currently in the United States, the combination of cisplatin/etoposide is the standard first-line therapy in SCLC. At this time, topotecan is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved chemotherapeutic agent for second-line treatment of SCLC. In this paper, we review studies of second-line chemotherapy for SCLC.

The role of chemotherapy in brain metastases

Despite the widely held belief of the resistance to chemotherapy of brain metastases, central nervous system metastases of a malignancy are equally sensitive to chemotherapy as its metastases elsewhere in the body. This is due to the fact that the blood-brain barrier is disrupted in contrast enhancing brain metastases, and does not limit the response to chemotherapy. Therefore, the response rate of the primary tumour. Up-front chemotherapeutic treatment instead of radiotherapy of brain metastases should therefore be based on the chemosensitivity of the primary tumor to the used regimen, and not on the question whether the used agent penetrates an intact blood-brain barrier. First-line chemotherapy for brain metastases or with only minor neurological signs and symptoms, and who have an indication for systematic chemotherapy for metastases elsewhere in the body. In contrast, central nervous system micrometastases may hide behind an intact barrier, and this may be clinically relevant in patients that can be cured with chemotherapy (like in small cell lung cancer). Cytochrome P450 3A4 inducing anti-epileptic drugs like phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital may significantly increase the metabolism of many chemotherapeutic agents like CPT11 and paclitaxel (but also of newer biological agents like many tyrosine kinase inhibitors). These anti-epileptic drugs should be avoided in patients requiring chemotherapy with agents metabolised through the cytochrome P450.

Use of temozolomide with other cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastases from lung cancer

The use of chemotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases arising from lung cancer has been limited by poor efficacy and high toxicity. Temozolomide, an orally bioavailable alkylating agent that crosses the blood-brain barrier, has activity against brain metastases from both small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when used as a single agent, but response rates are low. Preclinical experiments and early clinical studies in other malignancies indicate that temozolomide may have additive or synergistic effects when used with other chemotherapeutic agents. We report a case of a patient with SCLC with recurrent brain metastases after treatment with multiple chemotherapeutic regimens and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) who was treated with temozolomide (150 mg/m(2) for 5 days in a 28-day cycle) and oral etoposide (50 mg/m(2) for 10 days in a 28-day cycle). A second patient with NSCLC and brain metastases who progressed after treatment with chemotherapy and WBRT was treated with temozolomide (150 mg/m(2) for 5 days in a 28-day cycle) and gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) weekly for 2 weeks in a 3- week cycle). In both patients, the temozolomide regimens were extremely well tolerated and resulted in dramatic and durable responses. The combination of temozolomide with other chemotherapeutic agents represents a promising strategy for treating patients with lung cancer and recurrent brain metastases and merits further study.

Response to topotecan of symptomatic brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer also after whole-brain irradiation. a multicentre phase II study

The purpose of this multicentre phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan in pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who relapsed with symptomatic brain metastases. 30 patients with a median age of 62 years were entered into the study. 22 patients received the initially planned dose of 1.5 mg/m(2) topotecan as a 30-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Due to the observed thrombocytopenia, the dose was reduced to 1.25 mg/m(2) in the last 8 patients. All 30 patients were pretreated with chemotherapy: 14 with one and 16 with at least two protocols. 8 patients had prior whole-brain iradiation (WBI): 7 in the prophylactic and 1 in the palliative setting. Concomitant systemic metastases were recorded in 24 patients at the time of brain relapse. Cerebral metastases responded in 33% of patients (10/30; three complete responses (CR) and seven partial responses (PR)). Noteworthy is the fact that response was achieved in 4 of 8 patients pretreated by WBI (3 in prophylactic and 1 in palliative setting). The systemic response rate was 29% (7/24). Median time to progression was 3.1 months (range 0.25-14.2+ months), median survival from the beginning of this study was 3.6 months (range 0.25-14.2+ months). Therapy was generally well tolerated, with myelotoxicity being the most common adverse event. Grade 3 leucocytopenia according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) occurred in 28% (23/83) of the courses and grade 4 in 22% (18/83). Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was observed in 17% of the courses (14/83) and grade 4 in 11% (9/83). 17% of patients (5/30) had a documented grade 3 infection. These results using topotecan are promising in heavily pretreated patients with SCLC brain metastases and merit further evaluation.

Small cell lung cancer: current therapy and promising new regimens

In this review, we cover current therapy and promising new regimens and highlight areas where improvement is needed in the management of small cell lung cancer.

Single-agent gemcitabine in patients with resistant small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to assess the activity and toxicity ofgemcitabine in patients with resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS TAND METHODS: Forty-one patients with limited- or extensive-stage SCLC, who were previously treated with at least one chemotherapeutic regimen and progressed during or within three months of finishing the last regimen, were treated with 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15 of a four-week cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were evaluable for response. Five partial and no complete responses were seen, for an overall response rate of 13% (95% confidence interval (CI): 6%-27%). Time to progression varied from 4 to 20 weeks, with a median of 8 weeks. Median survival was 17 weeks (range 4-84 weeks). Hematological toxicity mainly consisted of NCI-CTC grade 3 thrombocytopenia (29% of patients) and, to a lesser extent, grade 3 leukopenia (18% of patients). Non-hematological toxicity was mild, with nausea being the most commonly reported event.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine has modest activity in patients with resistant SCLC. There is some non-cross resistance to most agents against SCLC.

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer

Brain is the most common site of metastatic spread in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Approximately 10% of SCLC patients have brain metastases (BM) already at diagnosis and an additional 40% will develop central nervous system (CNS) involvement during their disease course. Although whole brain radiotherapy and corticosteroids is considered the treatment of choice, accumulating evidence suggests that systemic chemotherapy may also play an important role. The concept of the brain as a pharmacologic sanctuary site for established metastases is in contrast with recent clinical observations of frequent BM responses with systemic chemotherapy. During the last decade, several reports about the effect of systemic chemotherapy on BM from SCLC have been published. Pooled data from five studies report 66% response rate (RR) in 64 patients with initial BM. In addition, an average RR of 36% is derived from five studies including 135 patients with delayed BM treated with systemic single agent chemotherapy. Among new drugs with activity in patients with SCLC brain metastases, camptothecin analog topotecan is one of the most promising with a 52% RR. Although whole brain radiation remains the standard treatment of established BM in SCLC there is an emerging role for systemic chemotherapy, particularly with the use of new active drugs as part of combined modality treatments.

The blood-brain barrier and oncology: new insights into function and modulation

The efficacy of chemotherapy for malignant primary or metastatic brain tumours is still poor. This is at least partly due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The functionality of the BBB can be explained by physicochemical features and efflux pump mechanisms. An overview of the literature is presented with emphasis on oncology. The BBB consists of capillary endothelial cells that lack fenestrations and are connected together with continuous tight junctions, with a high electrical resistance. Permeability of tight junctions can be increased in vitro by contraction of the cytoskeleton, caused by bradykinin agonists. Different efflux pumps are present in the BBB. Examples are P-glycoprotein (P-gp), organic anion transporters, (OAT) and multidrug-resistance-associated proteins (MRP)(1 and 3). These pumps act as a multi-specific efflux pump for various chemotherapeutic drugs. Experiments have shown that P-gp can be inhibited by different non-chemotherapeutic substrates such as cyclosporin A. The functionality in vivo of P-gp can be measured with positron emission tomography and [(11)C]-verapamil or with single photon emission computer tomography and(99m)Tc-sestamibi. MRP(1)and MRP(3)act as organic anion transporters that in vitro act as efflux pumps for substances that are conjugated or co-transported with glutathione and glucuronide, respectively. Methotrexate has been recently demonstrated to be transported by MRP(1)and MRP(3). Results of studies which demonstrate the clinical relevance and applicability of BBB modulators are eagerly awaited.

Treatment of brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: comparing teniposide and teniposide with whole-brain radiotherapy--a phase III study of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

Approximately 60% of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) develop brain metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) gives symptomatic improvement in more than 50% of these patients. Because brain metastases are a sign of systemic progression, and chemotherapy was found to be effective as well, it becomes questionable whether WBRT is the only appropriate therapy in this situation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a phase III study, SCLC patients with brain metastases were randomized to receive teniposide with or without WBRT. Teniposide 120 mg/m(2) was given intravenously three times a week, every 3 weeks. WBRT (10 fractions of 3 Gy) had to start within 3 weeks from the start of chemotherapy. Response was measured clinically and by computed tomography of the brain.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty eligible patients were randomized. A 57% response rate was seen in the combined-modality arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 69%), and a 22% response rate was seen in the teniposide-alone arm (95% CI, 12% to 34%) (P<.001). Time to progression in the brain was longer in the combined-modality group (P=.005). Clinical response and response outside the brain were not different. The median survival time was 3.5 months in the combined-modality arm and 3.2 months in the teniposide-alone arm. Overall survival in both groups was not different (P=.087).

CONCLUSION

Adding WBRT to teniposide results in a much higher response rate of brain metastases and in a longer time to progression of brain metastases than teniposide alone. Survival was poor in both groups and not significantly different.

Chemotherapy for brain metastases of lung cancer: a review

In lung cancer patients brain metastases develop with a high frequency. For years radiotherapy has been the standard treatment for these patients. Here we review the experience with chemotherapy for brain metastases in lung cancer patients. The concept of the brain as pharmacological sanctuary site when brain metastases are present is challenged and it is argued that chemotherapy does play a role in this situation. Recent clinical trials indicate that the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy may become the standard treatment for lung cancer patients with brain metastases. It is unclear whether for micrometastatic disease to the brain, blood brain barrier function is of importance for the outcome of chemotherapy in lung cancer patients with respect to the development of overt brain metastases. Areas of improvement of delivery of cytotoxic agents to the brain when brain metastases have not yet developed are discussed.

Complete remission of brain metastases from ovarian carcinoma with carboplatin

Central nervous system involvement by epithelial ovarian carcinoma is rare. We report the case of a 49 year old woman with stage IV serous carcinoma of the ovary who developed multiple cerebral and cerebellar metastases 7 months after achieving complete response to platin-based chemotherapy. Eight courses of carboplatin (400 mg/m2) were administered and after the second cycle complete remission of the brain deposits occured. The treatment afforded rapid subjective and objective relief and was associated with a good quality of life. Abdominal recurrent disease was diagnosed 22 months after treatment for brain involvement. Paltin-based chemotherapy was reinstated, but the patient died from progressive adbominal disease without any sign of cerebral involvement and any neurological symptomatology. Carboplatin should be considered for the treatment of ovarian carcinoma metastatic to the brain.

The treatment of patients with recurrent brain metastases. A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases represent a major source of morbidity in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively in 214 patients with brain metastases from nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent resection at Memorial Hospital (New York, NY) between January, 1976, and December, 1990.

RESULTS

The study group included 109 patients (51%) with symptomatic recurrent brain tumors (median, 5.0 months after complete resection). Recurrence in the brain was at the original site in 62% of patients and at other sites in 38%. The median survival (MS) was 11.3 months in the recurrence group compared with 9.5 months (P < 0.5) in the nonrecurrence group (N = 105). Thirty-two patients had further surgery after recurrence; their median relapse time was 5.2 months. In these patients, survival (MS, 15.0 months) calculated from the time of their first operation, was significantly different (P < 0.001) from that of patients who did not undergo a second procedure (N = 77) (MS, 10.0 months). In the 32 patients who underwent reoperation, MS from the time of the second operation was 10 months, whereas the median interval from the first operation was 5 months (average, 5.7 months). Eight of these 32 patients had a third operation, after a median relapse time of 4 months; their MS was 42 months. There was a significant difference (P < 0.02) between the MS of 39 patients synchronously diagnosed with lung cancer and brain metastasis (MS, 9.0 months) and 70 metachronously diagnosed patients (MS, 14.6 months). Women (N = 55) survived longer than men (N = 54) (14.4 months vs. 9.7 months, P < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed that histology, disease stage, and completeness of resection of the primary tumor also affected survival (P < 0.02, P < 0.014, and P < 0.001, respectively). Although no significant difference was found between survival of patients with recurrence in the supratentorial space and patients with recurrence in the posterior fossa (MS, 11.4 months vs. 11.2 months, P < 0.13), no one from the latter subgroup survived 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

If technically feasible, further surgery is effective in prolonging the survival of patients with NSCLC who have recurring brain metastases.

Central nervous system metastases in patients with ovarian carcinoma. A report of 23 cases and a literature review

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement by ovarian carcinoma is rare.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 1982 to September 1994, 23 patients with CNS metastases from ovarian carcinoma were observed in our institution.

RESULTS

Their median age at the time of CNS metastasis diagnosis was 59 years, and the median interval between diagnosis of ovarian cancer and documentation of the metastasis was 35 months. The most common symptoms related to CNS involvement were motor weakness, headache, seizures, dizziness and visual disturbances. One patient had meningeal carcinomatosis; 22 had parenchymal lesions (18 cerebral and 4 cerebellar). Nine patients had a single CNS lesion, and 13 had multiple metastatic sites. CNS was the only site of disease in 9 patients, while 8 had concomitant extraperitoneal dissemination. The median survival (MS) from diagnosis of cerebral metastases for the entire series was five months. Four patients were not treated (MS 3 months); 14 received radiotherapy (MS 5.5 months), and five underwent surgical resection of solitary metastases followed by radiotherapy (MS 17 months). Number of CNS lesions, extent of the disease at the time of CNS metastasis and treatment were the only factors which significantly affected survival

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with CNS metastasis from ovarian carcinoma appears poor. However, early diagnosis followed by multimodal treatment may result in significant palliation and improve overall survival in a selected group of patients.