The radiological assessment of vertebral osteoporosis

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density: 2022 Update

Osteoporosis constitutes a significant public health risk. An estimated 10.2 million adults in the United States >50 years of age have osteoporosis, a systemic condition that weakens the bones increasing the susceptibility for fractures. Approximately one-half of women and nearly one-third of men >50 years of age will sustain an osteoporotic fracture. These fractures are associated with a decrease in quality of life, diminished physical function, and reduced independence. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the primary imaging modality used to screen for osteoporosis in women >65 years of age and men >70 years of age. DXA may be used in patients <65 years of age to evaluate bone mass density if there are additional risk factors. In certain situations, vertebral fracture assessment and trabecular bone score may further predict fracture risk, particularly in patients who are not yet osteoporotic but are in the range of osteopenia. Quantitative CT is useful in patients with advanced degenerative changes in the spine. Given the proven efficacy of pharmacologic therapy, the role of imaging to appropriately identify and monitor high-risk individuals is critical in substantially reducing osteoporosis-associated morbidity and mortality, and reducing the considerable cost to the health care system. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Prevalence and treatment of fragility fractures in Spanish primary care: PREFRAOS study

In Spanish primary care (PC), the prevalence of fragility fractures (FF) in subjects ≥ 70 years old is high, especially in women. One-third of subjects with an FF lacked osteoporosis (OP) diagnosis and >50% were not currently receiving OP medication. An improvement of the FF management in this population is needed.

PURPOSE

In Spanish PC, the prevalence of FF is high, especially in women. One-third of subjects with a FF lacked an OP diagnosis and more than half were not currently receiving OP medication. Several studies reported underdiagnosis/undertreatment of OP in PC among elderly subjects with FF. To date, no such data exist for Spain. The purpose is to estimate the prevalence of FF in the elderly population (≥ 70 years old) and to describe the characteristics, risk factors, comorbidities, and OP diagnosis and treatment rates of subjects with FF in Spanish PC centers.

METHODS

This is an observational, retrospective study in Spain consisting of two phases. Phase A included all subjects ≥ 70 years old listed in the center's medical records from November 2018 to March 2020. Phase B included subjects with FF and prior consultation at the center for any reason. Subjects were excluded only if they had previously participated in another study. Primary outcomes were prevalence of FF (phase A) and characteristics of subjects with at least one FF (phase B).

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of FF was 17.7% among subjects visiting medical centers for any reason (24.1% women vs. 8.0% men) (30 PC centers from 14 Spanish regions). Vertebral (5.1%) was the most prevalent fracture. Of 665 subjects in phase B, most (87%) were women and ≥ 80 years old (57%), suffered mainly major OP fracture (68%), and had multiple comorbidities (≥ 2, 89.2%). While two-thirds had OP diagnosis and 61.1% received OP medication anytime in the past, 56.8% were not currently receiving OP medication. Diagnosis and treatment rates were lower among men (43% and 38% vs. 70% and 65%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of FF was high, especially in women. One-third of subjects lacked OP diagnosis and ≥ 50% were not receiving OP treatment; diagnosis and treatment gaps were larger among men. This reinforces the need to improve the management of FF in the elderly population. However, as PC centers participating in this study had high OP experience that have the potential to do better in terms of diagnosis and treatment, caution in the generalization of these data should be taken.

Vertebral compression fractures: a review of current management and multimodal therapy

Vertebral compression fractures are a prevalent disease affecting osteoporotic patients. When symptomatic, they cause significant pain and loss of function and have a high public health impact. In this paper we outline the diagnosis and management of these patients, with evidence-based review of treatment outcomes for the various therapeutic options. Diagnosis involves a clinical history focusing on the nature of the patient’s pain as well as various imaging studies. Management is multimodal in nature and starts with conservative therapy consisting of analgesic medication, medication for osteoporosis, physical therapy, and bracing. Patients who are refractory to conservative management may be candidates for vertebral augmentation through either vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Standardised quantitative morphometry: a modified approach for quantitative identification of prevalent vertebral deformities

Our approach for the quantitative identification of vertebral deformity (standardised quantitative morphometry, SQM) reduces problems associated with obtaining reference intervals from populations with high prevalence of fracture. In women with osteoporosis, agreement with radiological diagnosis (surrogate gold standard) was better for SQM than QM using the Eastell-Melton method.

INTRODUCTION

Use of reference intervals for quantitative vertebral morphometry (QM) derived by statistical trimming can be problematic in reference populations with high prevalence of deformity. We have developed a modified approach known as standardised quantitative morphometry (SQM), whereby vertebral height is standardised to eliminate variation between individuals. The aims of this study were to compare SQM to QM (Eastell-Melton method) for identification of prevalent vertebral deformities, using qualitative radiological diagnosis as the gold standard, and automate the process.

METHODS

Our study populations were a clinic-based sample of 80 women ages 48 to 87 years with a high prevalence of vertebral deformity and a general practice (GP)-based sample of 372 women ages 50 to 85 years. Agreement with the gold standard was tested for SQM and QM.

RESULTS

Agreement was better for SQM (kappa = 0.80) than for QM (kappa = 0.14) in the clinic sample using clinic-based reference data. The agreement was improved for QM using the GP-based reference data, kappa = 0.63. In the GP population, agreement was good for both SQM and QM (kappa = 0.59 and 0.54 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In our population with a high prevalence of vertebral fracture, SQM performs better than the Eastell-Melton method.

Continuous Intrathecal Morphine Infusion in Patients With Vertebral Fractures Due to Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

Vertebral fractures are the most common consequences of severe osteoporosis. The chronic pain from collapse of osteoporotic vertebrae affects quality of life (QOL) and autonomy of patients. The management of pain with oral or transdermal opiates can cause severe side effects. Continuous intrathecal administration of morphine via an implantable pump might represent an alternative therapy to conventional oral or transdermal administration of opioids and has some advantages and disadvantages for pain relief and improvement in QOL when compared with conventional opioid delivery. It is our objective to report our experience using intrathecal delivery of analgesics in a population of patients with refractory pain due to vertebral fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 24 patients, refractory to conventional delivery of opioids, we used intrathecal analgesic therapy. To test for efficacy and improvement in QOL, we administered the visual analog scale for pain and the Questionnaire of the European Foundation of Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Before patients were selected for pump implantation, an intraspinal drug delivery trial was performed to monitor side effects and responses to intrathecal therapy.

RESULTS

Significant pain relief was obtained in all implanted patients. Using the QUALEFFO, we observed significant improvement of all variables such as quality of daily life, domestic work, ambulation, and perception of health status, before and after 1 year after pump implantation. With intrathecal morphine infusion, none of the 24 patients required additional systemic analgesic medication. The mean morphine dose during the spinal trial was 11.28 mg/d, 7.92 mg/d at pump implantation, and 16.32 mg/d at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that intrathecal administration of morphine efficiently relieves the symptoms of pain and improves QOL. Continuous intrathecal administration of morphine appears to be an alternative therapy to conventional analgesic drug delivery and has advantages in those patients who have severe side effects with systemic administration of analgesics.

Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures

Although many vertebral fractures are clinically silent, they are associated with increased risk for subsequent osteoporotic fractures. A substantial number of these fractures are demonstrable using instant vertebral assessment with Hologic densitometers. Whether similar recognition is possible using dual-energy lateral vertebral assessment (LVA) with GE Lunar densitometers remains uncertain. Thus, we evaluated the ability of clinicians using LVA to detect prevalent vertebral fractures. Dual-energy LVA and conventional thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were concurrently obtained in 80 postmenopausal women. Using an established visual semiquantitative system, vertebral fractures were identified individually by two non-radiologist clinicians on LVA images, and the results were compared with spinal radiograph evaluation by an expert radiologist. Using LVA, 95% of vertebral bodies from T7 through L4 were evaluable, but a majority (66%) of vertebrae from T4 to T6 were not adequately visualized. In the LVA-evaluable vertebrae, prevalent fractures were identified in 40 vertebral bodies by radiography. In this regard, the clinicians using LVA detected 17 of 18 radiographically evident vertebral fractures of grade 2 or 3, a false negative rate of 6%. They identified 50% (11/22) of grade 1 fractures. Additionally, the vast majority of evaluable non-fractured vertebrae, (764/794, 96.2%) were correctly classified as normal by LVA. Thus, clinicians utilizing LVA correctly identified the vast majority of grade 2 or 3 vertebral compression fractures and normal vertebral bodies, although detection of grade 1 fractures was less effective. In conclusion, the low-radiation, dual-energy LVA technique provides a rapid and convenient way for clinicians to identify patients with, and without, grade 2 or 3 vertebral fractures, thereby enhancing care of osteoporotic patients.

Intra- and interobserver variability of Kleerekoper's method in vertebral fracture assessment

Radiographically detected vertebral fractures (VF) are a hallmark of osteoporosis. Several approaches to describe VF have been proposed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interobserver variability of semiquantitative Kleerekoper's method in osteoporotic VF assessment. Sixty-seven postmenopausal osteoporotic (L2-4 T-score < or =-2.5) women with a mean age of 65.2+/-7.51 years were included into the study. Lateral radiographs of thoracic and lumbar spine were evaluated in all patients. Kleerekoper's method was used to define VF. Two observers evaluated all radiographs independently. To investigate intraobserver reproducibility, the first observer reevaluated all radiographs a month later on a separate occasion. Intra- and interobserver agreement was calculated using the kappa statistic. The agreement between two readings for the first observer was 86.3% with a corresponding kappa score of 0.573 (95% confidence limits of kappa score were 0.505-0.642). Interobserver agreement was 87.7% with a corresponding kappa score of 0.660 (95% confidence limits were 0.602-0.718). We observed a moderate agreement for Kleerekoper's method in vertebral fracture assessment. There is no gold standard or standardized measurement or description for VF. Quantitative assessment of VF is essential in epidemiologic studies and in clinical drug trials, but a semiquantitative technique, which is done by experienced observers, should also be added to evaluate the entire spectrum of visible features that are helpful in identifying deformities.

Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research

Vertebral fractures are the hallmark of osteoporosis, and it has been shown that the presence of vertebral fractures adds to the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Thus, the evaluation of spinal radiographs for prevalent or incident vertebral fractures is important in the clinical evaluation of patients with osteoporosis, in clinical drug trials for osteoporosis treatment and in the epidemiologic evaluation of populations at risk for osteoporosis. Traditionally, conventional lateral radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine have been analyzed visually by radiologists or experienced clinicians to identify vertebral fractures in patients with clinical indications. Epidemiologic studies or clinical drug trials in osteoporosis research have considerably different requirements and expectations. To reduce potential subjectivity in qualitative readings and to provide definable, reproducible and objective methods to detect vertebral fracture, and to accommodate the assessment of large numbers of radiographs, various morphometric approaches have been explored and employed. However, potential deficiencies in morphometry have led to a renewed interest in standardized qualitative visual approaches for defining vertebral fractures and visual criteria. Numerous studies have shown that semiquantitative interpretation, after careful centralized training and standardization, can produce results with excellent intra- and interobserver reproducibility. We firmly believe that the experience from several studies has shown that there is a major role for radiologists and clinicians alike to carefully assess and diagnose vertebral fractures using standardized grading schemes such as the one proposed in this review. In the context of epidemiologic studies and clinical drug trials, quantitative morphometry may be used; however, the studies would be flawed if quantitative morphometry were to be performed in isolation without additional adjudication by a trained and highly experienced radiologist or clinician.

The prediction of height by armspan in older Chinese people

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of the predictive equations derived from older Chinese people without vertebral deformity with those derived from unselected older people, in estimating height from armspan.

METHODOLOGY

Height and armspan were measured in 789 older Chinese and 885 young Chinese in Hong Kong. All the older subjects had spinal X-ray (T4 to L4). Vertebral deformity was determined by a trained technician using a translucent digital analyser. Definite deformity was defined by a greater than 3 standard deviation increase in one of the three vertebral height ratios (anterior/posterior, middle/posterior and posterior/posterior). Eighty of the older subjects without vertebral deformity were randomly selected from the studied population for internal validation of predictive equations. The remaining subjects were used to derive sex-specific predictive equations for height by linear regression against armspan. The accuracy of these equations was analysed by the Bland and Altman method.

RESULTS

Vertebral deformity was present in 30.7% and 15.6% of older female and male subjects, respectively. Older women without vertebral deformity had significantly greater armspan: height ratio when compared with the young (1.04 versus 1.02), but the corresponding ratios were the same in older and young men (both 1.04). The predictive equation derived from older females without vertebral deformity had lower standard error of estimation and gave estimates closer to measured height than those derived from unselected older women. But this was not the case in older men.

CONCLUSION

In deriving predictive equation to estimate height by armspan in older Chinese women, selecting out older women without vertebral deformity increased accuracy of the equation. This was, however, not the case in older men.

Age-related cortical bone loss at the metacarpal

In order to evaluate in vivo the entity of endosteal and periosteal changes with age in the two sexes, and their relative contribution to age-related cortical bone loss, we undertook a cross-sectional study on a population of normal Caucasian subjects. The group included 189 women and 107 men who were studied by photodensitometry and radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal bone, derived from the same standard hand X-ray. Of the subjects, 134 were 65 years of age or older (75 women and 59 men). Metacarpal bone mineral density (BMD) correlated with age in both sexes, with an annual bone loss rate of 0.5% in women and 0.15% in men. In the over 65 group, correlation was significant only in women, who underwent an acceleration in the rate of bone loss (1% per year). Marrow cavity width (M), cortical index at the second metacarpal shaft (MI) and external width (W) all correlated with age in both sexes, although generally better in the female than in the male sex. M almost doubled from the fourth to the ninth decade in women and increased 50% in men. In the same age interval, MI showed an annual decrease of 0.49% in females and 0.33% in males. In the over 65 group, cortical thinning rate was significant in women (0.39% per annum) but not in men (0.14% per annum), whereas correlation of W was not significant in either sex. Finally, MI correlated with BMD in the whole study population and in the over 65, with a female prevalence in correlation strength maintained throughout life. The following conclusions can be derived for metacarpal aging: (1) an acceleration in cortical bone loss occurs in females after age 65; (2) age-related growth in periosteal diameter, although significant in the whole population, is negligible in the elderly of both sexes; (3) age-related cortical bone loss is generally more dependent on cortical thinning in women than in men.

Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group

The assessment of radiographs for vertebral fractures is important in the clinical evaluation of patients with suspected osteoporosis, in the epidemiological evaluation of elderly populations, and in clinical trials of osteotrophic drugs. The purpose of this study is to compare visual semiquantitative (SQ) approaches and quantitative morphometric approaches for assessing prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. We analyzed lateral thoracolumbar spine radiographs (baseline and approximately 3.5 year follow-up) of 503 women (age > or = 65) randomly selected from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) population. SQ assessment by an experienced radiologist graded vertebral fractures from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Incident fractures by SQ were defined as an increase of > or = 1 grade on follow-up radiographs. Trained research assistants visually triaged women as normal, uncertain, or probably fractured and visually flagged vertebrae with moderate/severe (grade > or = 2) prevalent fractures or with any (grade > or = 1 change) incident fracture. The radiographs were also digitized by research assistants, and quantitative morphometry (QM) was used to classify vertebral deformities at several cut-offs based on standard deviation (SD) reductions in height ratios from normal means, e.g., QM > or = 3 SD. Incident fractures by QM were defined as a decrease in height of more than 15% (QM15) on follow-up radiographs. Finally, a combination of these methods was used to detect moderate/severe prevalent fractures and any grade of incident fractures. In the overall analysis, the prevalence of fractures varied from 14 to 33% and the incidence from 5 to 10% by woman, depending upon the method and cut-off criteria. In the detailed analysis, considering visually triaged uncertain as abnormal, triage by research assistants detected 97.0% (163/168) of women with SQ grade > or = 1 fractures and 100% (70/70) with SQ grade > or = 2 fractures. Visual flagging by research assistants detected 88.5% (108/122) of SQ > or = 2 prevalent fractures (kappa score, kappa = 0.82) and 85.2% (52/61) of SQ incident fractures (kappa = 0.79). QM > or = 3 SD detected 37.9% (141/372) of SQ > or = 1 prevalent fractures (kappa = 0.51) and 79.5% (97/122) of SQ > or = 2 prevalent fractures (kappa = 0.68), plus 18 vertebrae without SQ fractures. QM 15 detected 59% (36/61) of SQ incident fractures (kappa = 0.70), plus five vertebrae without SQ incident fractures. The combination assessment detected 92% (112/122) of SQ > or = 2 prevalent fractures (kappa = 0.76) and 84% (51/61) of SQ incident fractures (kappa = 0.91). The precision errors of QM vertebral height measurements (baseline versus follow-up) ranged from 2.71 to 2.92%. Nevertheless, excluding the 5719 vertebrae that were clearly normal by morphometry, i.e., within 2 SD of the normal means at both baseline and follow-up, two-thirds (358/556) of the remaining vertebrae changed classification by at least 1 SD category. Visual triage and visual flagging by research assistants appear to be highly effective methods for vertebral fracture assessment in osteoporosis, potentially reducing the number of false-positive and false-negative fractures detected by QM, at least relative to SQ by the radiologists. There is higher concordance among the visual approaches studied than between the visual SQ and quantitative morphometric approaches, with QM having limited ability to detect mild fractures but good ability to detect moderate/severe fractures, as classified by SQ. Use of a combination of sensitive qualitative and quantitative criteria, with adjudication by an experienced radiologist, is feasible and draws upon the relative strengths of each of the methods. Quantitative morphometry should not be performed in isolation, particularly when applying highly sensitive morphometric criteria at low threshold levels, without visual assessment to confirm the detected prevalent or incident vertebral defor

Osteoporosis in steroid-dependent asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients on prolonged corticosteroid therapy are at risk of developing osteoporosis. Some patients with severe asthma are difficult to wean off corticosteroids and are therefore at risk of developing bony complications due to steroids.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of cumulative steroid dosage and duration of therapy with osteoporosis.

METHODS

We obtained bone mineral density studies using dual photon absorptiometry, and radiographs of the lumbar spine of 16 steroid-dependent patients with asthma. Patients with conditions affecting bone metabolism were excluded.

RESULTS

We studied 16 male steroid-dependent patients with asthma who received 4 to 41 grams equivalent dose of prednisone over a period of 1 to 15 years. The overall prevalence rate for abnormal age-matched bone mineral density was 50%. Abnormal bone mineral density was more commonly noted in the lumbar spine (38%) than in the femoral neck (19%). The lowest dose of corticosteroid associated with a decrease in bone mineral density was a cumulative steroid dose of 5.6 equivalent grams-prednisone.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged corticosteroid therapy can cause significant osteoporosis among male patients with steroid-dependent asthma. Bone loss due to corticosteroid therapy occurs at different rates at different bony sites.

Appendicular cortical bone loss after age 65: sex-dependent event?

Distal radius photodensitometric and second metacarpal radiogrammetric measurements were obtained from computerized analyses of standard hand X-Ray films of 296 Caucasian subjects (189 women and 107 men). This sample included 134 subjects > or = 65 years old (75 women and 59 men). Distal radius bone density and metacarpal index showed a significant linear decrease with age in both sexes. Rates of bone loss, calculated from the regression curves, were -0.7% per year in women and -0.5% per year in men by distal radial photodensitometry, and -0.49% per year in women and -0.33% per year in men by metacarpal radiogrammetry. In the elderly subgroup, women > or = 65 years of age showed an even faster bone loss, with an annual decrease of -1.4% by distal radial photodensitometry. Conversely, men > or = 65 years of age had no significant bone loss, not even by metacarpal radiogrammetry. In conclusion, these data suggest that appendicular cortical bone loss occurs at a higher rate in elderly females than in the elderly males, both at the distal radial and at the metacarpal site.

Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures

To compare visual semiquantitative (SQ) reading and quantitative morphometry (QM) for assessing prevalent and incident vertebral fractures, radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine were evaluated in 400 (only baseline films) and 335 (baseline and follow-up films) postmenopausal women with osteopenia as defined by a T-score of less than 2 SD below young normals. QM was performed using different cutoff thresholds, and the SQ reading was performed by three radiologists independently. A joint consensus reading of the radiographs by all participating radiologists was used as a reference standard. Our results indicate that the concordance within SQ methods is excellent, and it is higher than that between SQ and QM regardless of the cutoff criteria used. This finding was consistent for the diagnosis of prevalent as well as incident vertebral fractures. For prevalent fractures the use of the 2.5 SD cutoff criterion provided the highest concordance with the consensus reading and with the radiologists' reading, thereby providing high sensitivity (70.23%) with moderate specificity (98.76%) relative to the consensus reading when compared with the 3 SD or 4 SD cutoff criteria. For the diagnosis of incident vertebral fractures the best agreement between our consensus reading and QM was found for an absolute reduction of 6 mm and for a combination of relative and absolute reduction of 15% and 3 mm in vertebral height. The respective sensitivities and specificities for the two criteria were 51%/99.9% and 75.4%/98.9%, respectively. Even though the consensus reading may favor the reader's evaluation over QM, the assessment of prevalent and incident fractures using QM alone may not be sufficiently reliable for detection of vertebral fractures in epidemiological studies and clinical trials. It should be performed principally in conjunction with a trained radiologist or a highly experienced clinician.

Can radiologists detect osteopenia on plain radiographs?

The main purpose of this study was to compare subjective estimates of vertebral ostepenia with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the same region in 200 (107 male, 93 female) subjects, aged 52-90 years, invited randomly from the community. Standardized plain thoracolumbar radiographs were examined by three senior radiologists, and given a semiquantitative osteopenia score using the method of Saville. The BMD of the anteroposterior (AP) lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. In addition BMD measurements were compared in subjects without significant vertebral deformity, and those with mild (20-25%) or definite (> 25%) reductions of vertebral height. For the Saville score, intraobserver agreement was moderate to good (kappa 0.46-0.57), and interobserver agreement was fair to moderate (kappa 0.25-0.41). Although the overlap between gradings was considerable, BMD was significantly related to visually estimated osteopenia. Subjects without apparent radiographic osteopenia (Saville grade 0) had a low risk (9-15%), compared to those with definite osteopenia (64-86%), of falling below the lowest quartile of BMD at either the femoral neck or the AP spine. In women (but not men), BMD measured at the hip and spine was related to vertebral deformity.