Identification and actions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide

GLP1-GIP receptor co-agonists: a promising evolution in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes represents a growing challenge for global public health. Its prevalence is increasing worldwide, and, like obesity, it affects progressively younger populations compared to the past, with potentially greater impact on chronic complications. Dual glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) receptor agonists are among the new pharmacological strategies recently developed to address this challenge. Tirzepatide, characterized by its ability to selectively bind and activate receptors for the intestinal hormones GIP and GLP-1, has been tested in numerous clinical studies and is already currently authorized in several countries for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. In this context, the aim of the present document is to summarize, in the form of a narrative literature review, the currently available data on the main mechanisms of action of GIP/GLP-1 co-agonists and the clinical effects of tirzepatide evaluated in various clinical trials.

The Regulation of Metabolic Homeostasis by Incretins and the Metabolic Hormones Produced by Pancreatic Islets

In healthy humans, the complex biochemical interplay between organs maintains metabolic homeostasis and pathological alterations in this process result in impaired metabolic homeostasis, causing metabolic diseases such as diabetes and obesity, which are major global healthcare burdens. The great advancements made during the last century in understanding both metabolic disease phenotypes and the regulation of metabolic homeostasis in healthy individuals have yielded new therapeutic options for diseases like type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, it is unlikely that highly desirable more efficacious treatments will be developed for metabolic disorders until the complex systemic regulation of metabolic homeostasis becomes more intricately understood. Hormones produced by pancreatic islet beta-cells (insulin) and alpha-cells (glucagon) are pivotal for maintaining metabolic homeostasis; the activity of insulin and glucagon are reciprocally correlated to achieve strict control of glucose levels (normoglycaemia). Metabolic hormones produced by other pancreatic islet cells and incretins produced by the gut are also crucial for maintaining metabolic homeostasis. Recent studies highlighted the incomplete understanding of metabolic hormonal synergism and, therefore, further elucidation of this will likely lead to more efficacious treatments for diseases such as T2D. The objective of this review is to summarise the systemic actions of the incretins and the metabolic hormones produced by the pancreatic islets and their interactions with their respective receptors.

Incretin and glucagon receptor polypharmacology in chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease is a debilitating condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In recent years, the kidney effects of incretin-based therapies, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), have garnered substantial interest in the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity. This review delves into the intricate interactions between the kidney, GLP-1RAs, and glucagon, shedding light on their mechanisms of action and potential kidney benefits. Both GLP-1 and glucagon, known for their opposing roles in regulating glucose homeostasis, improve systemic risk factors affecting the kidney, including adiposity, inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial function. Additionally, these hormones and their pharmaceutical mimetics may have a direct impact on the kidney. Clinical studies have provided evidence that incretins, including those incorporating glucagon receptor agonism, are likely to exhibit improved kidney outcomes. Although further research is necessary, receptor polypharmacology holds promise for preserving kidney function through eliciting vasodilatory effects, influencing volume and electrolyte handling, and improving systemic risk factors.

Potential for Gut Peptide-Based Therapy in Postprandial Hypotension

Postprandial hypotension (PPH) is an important and under-recognised disorder resulting from inadequate compensatory cardiovascular responses to meal-induced splanchnic blood pooling. Current approaches to management are suboptimal. Recent studies have established that the cardiovascular response to a meal is modulated profoundly by gastrointestinal factors, including the type and caloric content of ingested meals, rate of gastric emptying, and small intestinal transit and absorption of nutrients. The small intestine represents the major site of nutrient-gut interactions and associated neurohormonal responses, including secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and somatostatin, which exert pleotropic actions relevant to the postprandial haemodynamic profile. This review summarises knowledge relating to the role of these gut peptides in the cardiovascular response to a meal and their potential application to the management of PPH.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Beyond Their Pancreatic Effects

Glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin secretory molecule. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) due to their attributes such as body weight loss, protection of islet β cells, promotion of islet β cell proliferation and minimal side effects. Studies have found that GLP-1R is widely distributed on pancreatic and other tissues and has multiple biological effects, such as reducing neuroinflammation, promoting nerve growth, improving heart function, suppressing appetite, delaying gastric emptying, regulating blood lipid metabolism and reducing fat deposition. Moreover, GLP-1RAs have neuroprotective, anti-infectious, cardiovascular protective, and metabolic regulatory effects, exhibiting good application prospects. Growing attention has been paid to the relationship between GLP-1RAs and tumorigenesis, development and prognosis in patient with T2DM. Here, we reviewed the therapeutic effects and possible mechanisms of action of GLP-1RAs in the nervous, cardiovascular, and endocrine systems and their correlation with metabolism, tumours and other diseases.

Incretin Hormones and Type 2 Diabetes-Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Approaches

Simple Summary

When we ingest a meal, our intestine secretes hormones that are released into the bloodstream. Amongst these hormones are the incretins hormones which stimulate the release of insulin from the pancreas which is essential for the regulation of in particular postprandial glucose concentrations. In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effect of the incretins is diminished. This is thought to contribute importantly to the pathophysiology of the disease. However, in pharmacological amounts, the incretins may still influence insulin secretion and metabolism. Much research has therefore been devoted to the development of incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes. These therapies include compounds that strongly resemble the incretins, hereby stimulating their effects as well as inhibitors of the enzymatic degradation of the hormones, thereby increasing the concentration of incretins in the blood. Both therapeutic approaches have been implemented successfully, but research is still ongoing aimed at the development of further optimized therapies.

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are secreted from the gut upon nutrient stimulation and regulate postprandial metabolism. These hormones are known as classical incretin hormones and are responsible for a major part of postprandial insulin release. The incretin effect is severely reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes, but it was discovered that administration of GLP-1 agonists was capable of normalizing glucose control in these patients. Over the last decades, much research has been focused on the development of incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes. These therapies include incretin receptor agonists and inhibitors of the incretin-degrading enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4. Especially the development of diverse GLP-1 receptor agonists has shown immense success, whereas studies of GIP monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes have consistently been disappointing. Interestingly, both GIP-GLP-1 co-agonists and GIP receptor antagonists administered in combination with GLP-1R agonists appear to be efficient with respect to both weight loss and control of diabetes, although the molecular mechanisms behind these effects remain unknown. This review describes our current knowledge of the two incretin hormones and the development of incretin-based therapies for treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Effect of corn processing on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and metabolite concentrations in feedlot cattle

The objectives of this trial were to evaluate the association between corn processing, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) concentration, and intramuscular (IM) fat deposition. We hypothesized that steers fed whole shelled corn (WSC) would have a greater IM fat deposition than steers fed cracked corn (CC) due to an increase in plasma GIP concentration. Backgrounded, Angus-cross cattle (initial body weight [BW] = 279 ± 9.8 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design in a feedlot setting for an average of 230 d. Cattle were allotted in 12 pens (6 pens per treatment with 8 animals per pen). There were three blocks: heifers (n = 32, initial BW = 265 ± 1.3 kg), small steers (n = 32, initial BW = 262 ± 1.3 kg), and large steers (n = 32, initial BW = 310 ± 1.4 kg). Two pens within each block were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: 1) CC or 2) WSC. Animal growth performance, carcass characteristics, and plasma hormone and metabolite concentrations were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, including the fixed effects of treatment, or treatment, time, and their interaction. Pen and block were included as random effects. Carcass yield and quality grade distributions were compared using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS. including the fixed effects of treatment and time with pen and block as random effects. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association of plasma GIP concentration and IM fat content. Average daily gain (P = 0.57) and final BW (P = 0.34) were similar, regardless of treatment. Cattle fed CC had reduced (P < 0.01) dry matter intake (DMI) when compared with those fed WSC. This lesser DMI resulted in improved gain:feed ratio (P < 0.01) for cattle fed CC compared with cattle fed WSC. There was no effect (P ≤ 0.33) of corn processing on plasma glucose, plasma GIP concentrations, hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, or marbling score. There was a positive linear relationship (P = 0.03) between IM fat concentration and plasma GIP concentration. In conclusion, feeding CC increased gain:feed ratio compared with WSC, but there was no difference in plasma GIP concentration, whereas plasma GIP concentration appears to be related to IM fat deposition.

GLP1 and GIP are involved in the action of synbiotics in broiler chickens

Background

In order to discover new strategies to replace antibiotics in the post-antibiotic era in meat-type chicken production, two new synbiotics were tested: (Lactobacillus salivarius IBB3154 plus galactooligosaccharide (Syn1) and Lactobacillus plantarum IBB3036 plus raffinose family oligosaccharides (Syn2).

Methods

The synbiotics were administered via syringe, using a special automatic system, into the egg air chamber of Cobb 500 broiler chicks on the 12^th day of egg incubation (2 mg of prebiotics + 10⁵ cfu bacteria per egg). Hatched roosters (total 2,400) were reared on an experimental farm, kept in pens (75 animals per pen), with free access to feed and water. After 42 d animals were slaughtered. Blood serum, pancreas, duodenum and duodenum content were collected.

Results

Syn2 increased trypsin activity by 2.5-fold in the pancreas and 1.5-fold in the duodenal content. In the duodenum content, Syn2 resulted in ca 30% elevation in lipase activity and 70% reduction in amylase activity. Syn1 and Syn2 strongly decreased expression of mRNA for GLP-1 and GIP in the duodenum and for GLP-1 receptors in the pancreas. Simultaneously, concentrations of the incretins significantly diminished in the blood serum (P < 0.05). The decreased expression of incretins coincides with changed activity of digestive enzymes in the pancreas and in the duodenal content. The results indicate that incretins are involved in the action of Syn1 and Syn2 or that they may even be their target. No changes were observed in key hormones regulating metabolism (insulin, glucagon, corticosterone, thyroid hormones, and leptin) or in metabolic indices (glucose, NEFA, triglycerides, cholesterol). Additionally, synbiotics did not cause significant changes in the activities of alanine and aspartate aminotransferases in broiler chickens. Simultaneously, the activity of alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase diminished after Syn2 and Syn1, respectively.

Conclusion

The selected synbiotics may be used as in ovo additives for broiler chickens, and Syn2 seems to improve their potential digestive proteolytic and lipolytic ability. Our results suggest that synbiotics can be directly or indirectly involved in incretin secretion and reception.

Uncertainties around incretin-based therapies: A literature review

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic debilitating and non-communicable disease. It has several long-term outcomes that are associated with various end organ damage, mainly the heart, blood vessels, eyes, nerves, and kidneys. There are different modalities of treatment of diabetes. The recent incretin-based therapies provided an innovative class of drugs including GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors. This review aims to summarize the available evidence of their effectiveness. Method: This is a narrative review. Several databases were searched. Search terms used were MeSH and keywords with different combinations of Boolean operators according to the database but were comparable. Studies included were: randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-controlled studies, health technology report, meta-analysis, and systematic reviews. Results were analysed and reported in a narrative style with emphasis on the effectiveness and adverse effects of various types of incretin based therapies. Results: 17 articles were retrieved as they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They were heterogeneous in terms of interventions, participants, settings and outcomes. Studies varied in their quality and/or reporting of their findings conducted in several settings. There are two types of incretin: Glucose dependent Insulinotropic Peptide (GIP) and Glucagon-like Peptide 1 (GLP-1). There is no question that incretin-based glucose-lowering medications have demonstrated to be effective glucose-lowering drugs. They proved an evidence-based efficacy profile and appear to do so with significant effects to stimulate weight loss with minimal hypoglycaemia. However, there are few side effects that should not be overlooked when deciding to use such therapies. Conclusion: The findings of our review presented here, do not prove that these agents are unsafe, but it does suggest that the burden of evidence now rests with those who hope to persuade us of their safety. Continuous clinical monitoring and more research are essential to clarify the actions of GLP-1R agonists and DPP-4 on the normal and diabetic exocrine pancreas.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide directly induces glucose transport in rat skeletal muscle

Several gastrointestinal proteins have been identified to have insulinotropic effects, including glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP); however, the direct effects of incretins on skeletal muscle glucose transport remain largely unknown. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to examine the role of GIP on skeletal muscle glucose transport and insulin signaling in rats. Relative to a glucose challenge, a mixed glucose+lipid oral challenge increased circulating GIP concentrations, skeletal muscle Akt phosphorylation, and improved glucose clearance by ∼35% (P < 0.05). These responses occurred without alterations in serum insulin concentrations. In an incubated soleus muscle preparation, GIP directly stimulated glucose transport and increased GLUT4 accumulation on the plasma membrane in the absence of insulin. Moreover, the ability of GIP to stimulate glucose transport was mitigated by the addition of the PI 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor wortmannin, suggesting that signaling through PI3K is required for these responses. We also provide evidence that the combined stimulatory effects of GIP and insulin on soleus muscle glucose transport are additive. However, the specific GIP receptor antagonist (Pro(3))GIP did not attenuate GIP-stimulated glucose transport, suggesting that GIP is not signaling through its classical receptor. Together, the current data provide evidence that GIP regulates skeletal muscle glucose transport; however, the exact signaling mechanism(s) remain unknown.

Effects of glucose and meal ingestion on incretin secretion in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance

Aims/Introduction:  Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are the major incretins; their secretion after various nutrient loads are well-evaluated in Caucasians. However, little is known of the relationship between incretin secretion and differing nutritional loading in Japanese subjects. In the present study, we evaluated GIP and GLP-1 secretion in Japanese subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) after glucose loading (75 g glucose and 17 g glucose) and meal ingestion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  A total of 10 Japanese NGT subjects participated in 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 17 g OGTT and meal tolerance test (MTT). Plasma glucose (PG), serum insulin (IRI), serum C-peptide (CPR), plasma total GIP, and plasma total GLP-1 levels during OGTT and MTT were determined.

RESULTS

  Area under the curve (AUC)-GIP was increased in proportion to the amount of glucose, and was highest in MTT, showing that GIP secretion is also stimulated by nutrients other than glucose, such as lipid. In contrast, although the larger glucose load tended to induce a larger GLP-1 release, AUC-GLP-1 was not significantly different among the three loading tests (75 g OGTT, 17 g OGTT, MTT) irrespective of the kind or amount of nutrition load.

CONCLUSIONS

  Our results suggest that nutritional composition might have a greater effect on GIP secretion than that on GLP-1 secretion in Japanese NGT subjects. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2011.00143.x, 2012).

Glucagon-like peptide-1 and its cardiovascular effects

Recently, the crucial role of GLP-1 in cardiovascular disease has been suggested by both preclinical and clinical studies. In vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated cardio-protective effects of GLP-1 by activating cell survival signal pathways, which have greatly reduced ischemia/reperfusion injury and also cardiac dysfunction in various congestive heart failure animal models. Clinically, beneficial effects of GLP-1 have been shown in patients with myocardial infarction, hypertension, and heart failure, and 2 classes of incretin enhancers, GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, are currently available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this review, we will summarize the role of incretins in various cardiovascular events such as hypertension and heart failure and postprandial lipoprotein secretion, and discuss their molecular mechanisms and potentials as a new therapeutic as well as preventive drug type for reducing cardiovascular events in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

Transcriptional regulatory factor X6 (Rfx6) increases gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) expression in enteroendocrine K-cells and is involved in GIP hypersecretion in high fat diet-induced obesity

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin released from enteroendocrine K-cells in response to nutrient ingestion. GIP potentiates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and induces energy accumulation into adipose tissue, resulting in obesity. Plasma GIP levels are reported to be increased in the obese state. However, the molecular mechanisms of GIP secretion and high fat diet (HFD)-induced GIP hypersecretion remain unclear, primarily due to difficulties in separating K-cells from other intestinal epithelial cells in vivo. In this study, GIP-GFP knock-in mice that enable us to visualize K-cells by enhanced GFP were established. Microarray analysis of isolated K-cells from these mice revealed that transcriptional regulatory factor X6 (Rfx6) is expressed exclusively in K-cells. In vitro experiments using the mouse intestinal cell line STC-1 showed that knockdown of Rfx6 decreased mRNA expression, cellular content, and secretion of GIP. Rfx6 bound to the region in the gip promoter that regulates gip promoter activity, and overexpression of Rfx6 increased GIP mRNA expression. HFD induced obesity and GIP hypersecretion in GIP-GFP heterozygous mice in vivo. Immunohistochemical and flow cytometry analysis showed no significant difference in K-cell number between control fat diet-fed (CFD) and HFD-fed mice. However, GIP content in the upper small intestine and GIP mRNA expression in K-cells were significantly increased in HFD-fed mice compared with those in CFD-fed mice. Furthermore, expression levels of Rfx6 mRNA were increased in K-cells of HFD-fed mice. These results suggest that Rfx6 increases GIP expression and content in K-cells and is involved in GIP hypersecretion in HFD-induced obesity.

Neuroprotective and neurotrophic actions of glucagon-like peptide-1: an emerging opportunity to treat neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular disorders

Like type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), neurodegenerative disorders and stroke are an ever increasing, health, social and economic burden for developed Westernized countries. Age is an important risk factor in all of these; due to the rapidly increasing rise in the elderly population T2DM and neurodegenerative disorders, both represent a looming threat to healthcare systems. Whereas several efficacious drugs are currently available to ameliorate T2DM, effective treatments to counteract pathogenic processes of neurodegenerative disorders are lacking and represent a major scientific and pharmaceutical challenge. Epidemiological data indicate an association between T2DM and most major neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Likewise, there is an association between T2DM and stroke incidence. Studies have revealed that common pathophysiological features, including oxidative stress, insulin resistance, abnormal protein processing and cognitive decline, occur across these. Based on the presence of shared mechanisms and signalling pathways in these seemingly distinct diseases, one could hypothesize that an effective treatment for one disorder could prove beneficial in the others. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based anti-diabetic drugs have drawn particular attention as an effective new strategy to not only regulate blood glucose but also to reduce apoptotic cell death of pancreatic beta cells in T2DM. Evidence supports a neurotrophic and neuroprotective role of GLP-1 receptor (R) stimulation in an increasing array of cellular and animal neurodegeneration models as well as in neurogenesis. Herein, we review the physiological role of GLP-1 in the nervous system, focused towards the potential benefit of GLP-1R stimulation as an immediately translatable treatment strategy for acute and chronic neurological disorders.

The role of the Wnt signaling pathway in incretin hormone production and function

Glucose metabolism is tightly controlled by multiple hormones and neurotransmitters in response to nutritional, environmental, and emotional changes. In addition to insulin and glucagon produced by pancreatic islets, two incretin hormones, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP, also known as glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide), also play important roles in blood glucose homeostasis. The incretin hormones mainly exert their regulatory effects via their corresponding receptors, which are expressed in pancreatic islets as well as many other extra-pancreatic organs. Recent studies have shown that the genes which encode these two incretin hormones can be regulated by the effectors of the Wnt signaling pathway, including TCF7L2, a transcription factor identified recently by extensive genome wide association studies as an important type 2 diabetes risk gene. Interestingly, TCF7L2 and β-catenin (β-cat), another effector of Wnt signaling pathway, may also mediate the function of the incretin hormones as well as the expression of their receptors in pancreatic β-cells. In this review, we have introduced the incretin hormones and the Wnt signaling pathway, summarized recent findings in the field, and provided our perspectives.

GLP-1, the gut-brain, and brain-periphery axes

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a gut hormone which directly binds to the GLP-1 receptor located at the surface of the pancreatic β-cells to enhance glucose-induced insulin secretion. In addition to its pancreatic effects, GLP-1 can induce metabolic actions by interacting with its receptors expressed on nerve cells in the gut and the brain. GLP-1 can also be considered as a neuropeptide synthesized by neuronal cells in the brain stem that release the peptide directly into the hypothalamus. In this environment, GLP-1 is assumed to control numerous metabolic and cardiovascular functions such as insulin secretion, glucose production and utilization, and arterial blood flow. However, the exact roles of these two locations in the regulation of glucose homeostasis are not well understood. In this review, we highlight the latest experimental data supporting the role of the gut-brain and brain-periphery axes in the control of glucose homeostasis. We also focus our attention on the relevance of β-cell and brain cell targeting by gut GLP-1 for the regulation of glucose homeostasis. In addition to its action on β-cells, we find that understanding the physiological role of GLP-1 will help to develop GLP-1-based therapies to control glycemia in type 2 diabetes by triggering the gut-brain axis or the brain directly. This pleiotropic action of GLP-1 is an important concept that may help to explain the observation that, during their treatment, type 2 diabetic patients can be identified as 'responders' and 'non-responders'.

The incretin system and cardiometabolic disease

Rates of type 2 diabetes, obesity and their associated detrimental cardiovascular effects are rapidly increasing. Despite the availability of several treatment options for type 2 diabetes and the use of intensive regimens combining several antidiabetic drugs, less than one-half of all patients reach a target glycosylated hemoglobin level of less than 7%. Disease progression due to ongoing deterioration of pancreatic islet cell health and beta-cell function is likely responsible. Therefore, there is a need to identify new pharmacological compounds that may not only treat hyperglycemia, but may also correct impaired glucose homeostasis and preserve endogenous beta-cell function. Identification and characterization of the incretin system and its effect on glucose homeostasis have resulted in the development of new antidiabetic agents that target these concerns. The current review examines the incretin effect and the pharmacological agents that have been developed based on the understanding of this physiological system. The influence of incretins on the cardiovascular system beyond the proatherogenic effect of type 2 diabetes will also be discussed.

Downregulation of GLP-1 and GIP receptor expression by hyperglycemia: possible contribution to impaired incretin effects in diabetes

Stimulation of insulin secretion by the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) has been found to be diminished in type 2 diabetes. We hypothesized that this impairment is due to a defect at the receptor level induced by the diabetic state, particularly hyperglycemia. Gene expression of incretin receptors, GLP-1R and GIPR, were significantly decreased in islets of 90% pancreatectomized (Px) hyperglycemic rats, with recovery when glucose levels were normalized by phlorizin. Perifused islets isolated from hyperglycemic Px rats showed reduced insulin responses to GLP-1 and GIP. To examine the acute effect of hyperglycemia on incretin receptor expression, a hyperglycemic clamp study was performed for 96 h with reduction of GLP-1 receptor expression but increase in GIP receptor expression. Similar findings were found when islets were cultured at high glucose concentrations for 48 h. The reduction of GLP-1 receptor expression by high glucose was prevented by dominant-negative protein kinase C (PKC)alpha overexpression, whereas GLP-1 receptor expression was reduced with wild-type PKCalpha overexpression. Taken together, GLP-1 and GIP receptor expression is decreased with chronic hyperglycemia, and this decrease likely contributes to the impaired incretin effects found in diabetes.

PKA-dependent and PKA-independent pathways for cAMP-regulated exocytosis

Stimulus-secretion coupling is an essential process in secretory cells in which regulated exocytosis occurs, including neuronal, neuroendocrine, endocrine, and exocrine cells. While an increase in intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) is the principal signal, other intracellular signals also are important in regulated exocytosis. In particular, the cAMP signaling system is well known to regulate and modulate exocytosis in a variety of secretory cells. Until recently, it was generally thought that the effects of cAMP in regulated exocytosis are mediated by activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), a major cAMP target, followed by phosphorylation of the relevant proteins. Although the involvement of PKA-independent mechanisms has been suggested in cAMP-regulated exocytosis by pharmacological approaches, the molecular mechanisms are unknown. Newly discovered cAMP-GEF/Epac, which belongs to the cAMP-binding protein family, exhibits guanine nucleotide exchange factor activities and exerts diverse effects on cellular functions including hormone/transmitter secretion, cell adhesion, and intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization. cAMP-GEF/Epac mediates the PKA-independent effects on cAMP-regulated exocytosis. Thus cAMP regulates and modulates exocytosis by coordinating both PKA-dependent and PKA-independent mechanisms. Localization of cAMP within intracellular compartments (cAMP compartmentation or compartmentalization) may be a key mechanism underlying the distinct effects of cAMP in different domains of the cell.

Effect of duodenectomy on gastric motility and gastric hormones in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the duodenum is required to coordinate interdigestive insulin secretion with gastrointestinal motility and to determine whether duodenectomy alters the interdigestive cycles of plasma motilin and insulin levels and their relations to insulin secretion and motility.

METHODS

Adult mongrel dogs were chronically implanted with force transducers in the stomach, duodenum, and upper jejunum to monitor contractile activity. Eight healthy mongrel dogs were divided into control and duodenectomized dogs. Insulin secretion, gastrointestinal motility, and plasma concentrations of motilin during the interdigestive period were measured in normal and duodenectomized dogs.

RESULTS

After duodenectomy, no obvious phase III contractions were seen in the gastric antrum, but migrating phase III contractions were seen in the upper jejunum. The plasma motilin concentration did not fluctuate as it does in normal dogs, and remained low. After duodenectomy, insulin secretory cycles were not coordinated with either cycles of interdigestive motility or the plasma concentration of motilin. Exogenous motilin administration stimulated endogenous insulin release significantly compared with saline-treated controls. The contractile response of the stomach to exogenous motilin after duodenectomy was similar to that of intact dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

Duodenectomy disrupts the relation between cycles of both interdigestive gastrointestinal motility and insulin secretion. These effects of duodenectomy may be attributable to interruption of the duodenopancreatic neural connections, hormonal abnormalities, or loss of vagus-sensitive humoral factors. The duodenum, which stores motilin, seems to play an important role in the relations between gastric migrating motor complexes and the concomitant increase of insulin secretion in fasted dogs. The mechanism responsible for the effect of motilin in both duodenectomized and normal dogs may involve a cholinergic pathway.

Reduced postprandial concentrations of intact biologically active glucagon-like peptide 1 in type 2 diabetic patients

Incretin hormones importantly enhance postprandial insulin secretion but are rapidly degraded to inactive metabolites by ubiquitous dipeptidyl peptidase IV. The concentrations of the intact biologically active hormones remain largely unknown. Using newly developed assays for intact glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), we measured plasma concentrations after a mixed breakfast meal (566 kcal) in 12 type 2 diabetic patients (age 57 years [range 49-67], BMI 31 kg/m2 [27-38], and HbA1c 9.2% [7.0-12.5]) and 12 matched healthy subjects. The patients had fasting hyperglycemia (10.7 mmol/l [8.0-14.8]) increasing to 14.6 mmol/l (11.5-21.5) 75 min after meal ingestion. Fasting levels of insulin and C-peptide were similar to those of the healthy subjects, but the postprandial responses were reduced and delayed. Fasting levels and meal responses were similar between patients and healthy subjects for total GIP (intact + metabolite) as well as intact GIP, except for a small decrease in the patients at 120 min; integrated areas for intact hormone (area under the curve [AUC]INT) averaged 52 +/- 4% (for patients) versus 56 +/- 3% (for control subjects) of total hormone AUC (AUC(TOT)). AUC(INT) for GLP-1 averaged 48 +/- 2% (for patients) versus 51 +/- 5% (for control subjects) of AUC(TOT). AUC(TOT) for GLP-1 as well as AUC(INT) tended to be reduced in the patients (P = 0.2 and 0.07, respectively); but the profile of the intact GLP-1 response was characterized by a small early rise (30-45 min) and a significantly reduced late phase (75-150 min) (P < 0.02). The measurement of intact incretin hormones revealed that total as well as intact GIP responses were minimally decreased in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas the late intact GLP-1 response was strongly reduced, supporting the hypothesis that an impaired function of GLP-1 as a transmitter in the enteroinsular axis contributes to the inappropriate insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 retards gastric emptying and small bowel transit in the rat: effect mediated through central or enteric nervous mechanisms

This study investigated effects of glucagon-like peptide-1(7-36)amide (GLP-1) on gastric emptying, small intestinal transit, and contractility of smooth muscle strips in rats. GLP-1 at doses of 10 and 20 pmol/kg/min administered intravenously dose-dependently retarded transit of the small intestine (P < 0.001), while only the higher dose of 20 pmol/kg/min retarded gastric emptying (P < 0.01). GLP-1 at concentrations up to 10(-4) M did not affect the basal tone or contractility of the gastrointestinal muscle strips that were stimulated with electric field stimulation or acetylcholine. Our results demonstrate that small intestinal transit seems more sensitive than gastric emptying to inhibition by GLP-1 at physiologic levels in plasma. Furthermore, this inhibition appears to be mediated through central mechanisms rather than through peripheral actions. Thus, GLP-1 is suggested to inhibit gastric emptying and small intestinal transit through an indirect effect via central or enteric nervous mechanisms.

Inhibitory effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 on small bowel motility. Fasting but not fed motility inhibited via nitric oxide independently of insulin and somatostatin

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)(7-36)amide on fasted and fed motility in the rat small intestine were investigated in relation to its dependence on nitric oxide (NO), insulin, and somatostatin. Small bowel electromyography was performed using bipolar electrodes implanted 15, 25, and 35 cm distal to pylorus, and transit was studied with a radioactive marker. In the fasted state, GLP-1 (5-20 pmol kg-1min-1), reaching physiological plasma levels, prolonged the migrating myoelectric complex (MMC) cycle length along with slowed transit. This effect was antagonized by exendin(9-39)amide. The NO synthase inhibitor Nomega-nitro- L-arginine (L-NNA) also blocked the response to GLP-1, whereas L-arginine restored the response. Insulin (80-200 pmol kg-1min-1) induced irregular spiking, whereas somatostatin (100-500 pmol kg-1min-1) increased the MMC cycle length, independently of NO. In the fed state, GLP-1 (20-40 pmol kg-1min-1) reduced motility, an inhibition unaffected by L-NNA, whereas motility was stimulated by exendin(9-39)amide. Infusion of GLP-1 (20-100 pmol kg-1min-1) did not affect plasma insulin, but somatostatin was increased. In conclusion, GLP-1 seems to inhibit small bowel motility directly via the GLP-1 receptor. Inhibition of fasting motility is dependent of NO and not mediated via insulin or somatostatin, whereas inhibition of fed motility is independent of NO.

Response of truncated glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide to glucose ingestion in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Effect of sulfonylurea therapy

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (tGIP) and truncated glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are potent gastrointestinal insulinotropic factors (incretin), are most released after a meal or ingestion of glucose in man and animals. To investigate whether sulfonylurea (SU) affects the secretion of incretin, the modulation of plasma GIP and tGLP-1 levels following glucose ingestion in non-insulin-dependent diabetic type 2 patients with or without SU therapy was studied. A 75-G oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was carried out on 9 healthy subjects (controls) and 18 patients with non-obese type 2, 9 of whom were treated by diet alone (NIDDM-diet) and the other 9 with SU (glibenclamide 2.5 mg or gliclazide 40 mg) once a day (NIDDM-SU). Plasma GIP was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) with R65 antibody, and GLP-1 was measured by RIA with N-terminal-directed antiserum R1043 (GLP-1NT) and C-terminal-directed antiserum R2337 (GLP-1CT). Following OGTT, plasma glucose, GIP, GLP-1NT, and GLP-1CT in type 2 patients increased more markedly than in controls, despite the lower response of insulin. However, there were no significant differences in plasma levels of these peptides between the NIDDM-diet and NIDDM-SU groups. Therefore, it is unlikely that SU is involved in the high response of GIP and GLP-1s to OGTT in type 2 patients.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide secretion after gastrectomy in patients with diabetes mellitus

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) secretion after distal gastrectomy was compared between patients with diabetes mellitus (DM-group) and patients with normal glucose tolerance (N-group). GIP secretion in the DM-group was significantly greater in the early postcibal response period, but less in the late postcibal response period after gastrectomy, the total secretion of GIP being less after gastrectomy than before in this group. In the N-group, both the early and total postcibal responses of GIP were greater after gastrectomy than before. Moreover, the early and total postcibal secretions of GIP after gastrectomy were less in the DM-group than in the N-group. These findings suggest that GIP secretion in diabetics becomes insufficient after gastrectomy.

Comparison of the metabolic effects of mixed meal and standard oral glucose tolerance test on glucose, insulin and C-peptide response in healthy, impaired glucose tolerance, mild and severe non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects

Dietary constituents other than glucose can influence insulin secretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and administration of a standard mixed meal has been proposed as a more physiological test in regard to human diet for evaluating the patient both at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up. This study was carried out to compare the effects of a standard meal and the oral glucose tolerance test on glucose, insulin and C-peptide plasma levels in four groups of subjects: healthy controls, subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, patients with mild non-insulin-dependent diabetes, and non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with secondary failure to oral agents. Plasma glucose values were significantly higher after the oral glucose tolerance test than after the mixed meal in all four groups of subjects. Plasma insulin and C-peptide values were similar during the two tests in all groups of subjects except in non-insulin-dependent diabetics with secondary failure (flattened curves). Insulin and C-peptide responses per unit rise in blood glucose were significantly higher after the oral glucose tolerance test than after the mixed meal both in mild non-insulin-dependent diabetics (P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.05) and in non-insulin-dependent diabetics in secondary failure (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05). There was significant correlation between oral glucose tolerance test and mixed meal glucose incremental areas (r = 0.511, P less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide response to oral glucose and mixed meals is increased in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus

Considerable disagreement exists regarding the levels of immunoreactive glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide levels were therefore studied during oral glucose and mixed meal tolerance tests in normal subjects (n = 31) and newly presenting previously untreated patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 68). The tests were performed in random order after overnight fasts and blood samples were taken at 30 min intervals for 4 h. During the oral glucose tolerance test plasma glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide levels increased in the normal subjects from a fasting value of 20 +/- 3 pmol/l to a peak of 68 +/- 5 pmol/l at 30 min and in the Type 2 diabetic patients from a similar fasting level of 27 +/- 3 pmol/l to a higher peak value of 104 +/- 6 pmol/l at 30 min (p less than 0.001). Glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide levels were significantly higher in the diabetic patients compared with the normal subjects from 30-90 min (p less than 0.01-0.001) following oral glucose. During the meal tolerance test glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide levels increased in the normal subjects from a pre-prandial value of 22 +/- 4 pmol/l to a peak of 93 +/- 6 pmol/l at 90 min and in the Type 2 diabetic patients from a similar basal level of 25 +/- 2 pmol/l to a higher peak of 133 +/- 7 pmol/l at 60 min. Glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations were significantly higher in Type 2 diabetic patients compared with the normal subjects at 30 min (p less than 0.001), 60 min (p less than 0.01) and from 210-240 min (p less than 0.05) during the meal tolerance test. The groups were subdivided on the basis of degree of obesity and glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations were still higher in the diabetic subgroups compared with the normal subjects matched for weight. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with an exaggerated glucose dependent insulinotropic polypeptide response to oral glucose and mixed meals which is independent of any effect of obesity.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) hypersecretion in obesity depends on meal size and is not related to hyperinsulinemia

The response of immunoreactive gastric inhibitory polypeptide (IR-GIP), immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and immunoreactive C-peptide (IR-C-peptide) to the ingestion of mixed liquid test meals containing 1031 kcal (550 ml) and 422 kcal was studied in 17 obese and 17 normal weight control subjects. When the 422 kcal load was ingested in a volume of 550 ml, the plasma IR-GIP response was significantly greater than in a volume of 225 ml at 15 and 30 min in lean and obese subjects, but the total integrated IR-GIP response was not significantly different between the obese and lean group. Also intraduodenal infusion of 150 ml (280 kcal) of the test meal elicited identical plasma IR-GIP concentrations in lean and obese subjects. An exaggerated IR-GIP response in obese subjects was seen only following the 1031 kcal load (integrated IR-GIP response: 23.6 +/- 1.9 in lean subjects vs 50.3 +/- 3.8 nmol/l/180 min in obese subjects; p less than 0.01). The IRI response was always significantly greater in obese than in lean subjects and not related to the GIP response. Fasting plasma IR-C-peptide levels were significantly elevated in obese subjects (lean: 0.52 +/- 0.04; obese: 1.42 +/- 0.12 nmol/l; p less than 0.005), but the postprandial integrated IR-C-peptide responses in the obese and lean group were identical, indicating decreased hepatic insulin extraction in obesity. It is concluded that an exaggerated IR-GIP response in obesity occurs only after ingestion of a high calorie meal probably as consequence of an increased gastric emptying rate and that the hyperinsulinemic response of obese subjects is not attributable to GIP hypersecretion.

Evaluation of insulin secretion after pancreas autotransplantation by oral or intravenous glucose challenge

Segmental pancreatic autotransplantation is accompanied by surgical alterations to the pancreas that may have consequences for carbohydrate metabolism. Four mongrel dogs were evaluated before operation and sequentially until 40 weeks after total pancreatectomy and autotransplantation of the splenic lobe of the pancreas with bolus intravenous and oral administration. Intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) (0.5 g/kg) revealed maintenance of fasting euglycemia for as long as 40 weeks after operation. Peak glucose and integrated glucose values did not show significant changes as a result of autotransplantation. Following transplantation, a delayed peak insulin response was seen; however, basal, peak, and integrated insulin values were largely unaltered. Only K values, a measure of glucose disposal, showed severe alterations (2.44 +/- 0.21 before operation to 1.24 +/- 0.30 at 40 weeks after operation). Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) (2.0 g/kg) demonstrated an increased peak hyperglycemic response after autotransplantation with increased integrated glucose responses. Insulin levels remained at those levels seen before operation, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) responses were unchanged during the OGTT as late as 20 weeks after operation. In conclusion, pancreas autotransplantation after total pancreatectomy results in significant metabolic alterations that the IVGTT fails to detect with absolute glucose or insulin levels. However, K values are significantly lowered, which indicates alterations in cellular glucose transport. The OGTT demonstrates hyperglycemia without increased insulin or GIP levels, which suggests an altered beta cell response to the enteric stimulus of insulin release. These changes are nonetheless well tolerated by animals that have remained clinically healthy and euglycemic in the basal state.

New developments in the incretin concept

Experimental and clinical work over the last 6 years has confirmed and broadened, but also challenged, the incretin concept. The nervous component of the entero-insular axis is still poorly defined, especially the peptidergic nerves, of which several contain insulinotropic regulatory peptides. The incretin effect is preserved after complete denervation of the porcine pancreas. Type 2 (non insulin-dependent) diabetic patients have a significantly decreased incretin effect. GIP (gastric inhibitory polypeptide; glucose dependent insulin releasing peptide) remains the strongest incretin factor. Its secretion depends on the absorption of nutrients. However, the correlation between the GIP response and disturbances of the entero-insular axis in some gastrointestinal diseases and, in particular, Type 2 diabetes, is poor. Furthermore, physiological concentrations of exogenous GIP do not produce fully the incretin effect and injection of GIP antibodies does not abolish the incretin effect. This suggests the existence of additional humoral incretin factors. On the other hand, GIP seems to have direct metabolic effects independent of its insulinotropic activity. The incretin effect of oral glucose is smaller if plasma levels of C-peptide rather than insulin are measured. However, decreased hepatic extraction of insulin after glucose ingestion only accounts partially for the incretin effect. GIP is unlikely to be the gut factor which regulates hepatic insulin extraction.

Preservation of incretin activity after removal of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) from rat gut extracts by immunoadsorption

The action of watery rat gut extracts on glucose-induced insulin release in anaesthetized rats was examined before and after removal of GIP by immunoadsorption. Infusions of GIP-containing rat gut extracts nearly doubled the insulin release induced by intravenous glucose (1 g X kg -1 X h -1). Peak insulin secretion was 98 +/- 11 mU/l (mean +/- SEM) after intravenous glucose and increased to 178 +/- 16 mU/l following infusion of glucose plus gut extract (p less than 0.005). After injection of GIP antiserum in sufficient amounts to neutralize the GIP activity in the gut extract preparation, the additional insulin release due to the gut extract was reduced by only 30%. After complete removal of GIP from gut extracts by immuno-absorption, more than 50% of the incretin effect remained. These data suggest that the insulinotropic activity of rat gut extracts can only be partially related to GIP. The existence of additional insulinotropic gut factors which may also be released following oral glucose is postulated.

Effect of pretreatment with a high fat diet on the gastric inhibitory polypeptide and insulin responses to oral triolein and glucose in rats

Male Wistar rats were pretreated with 3 ml triolein orally for 4 days in addition to their normal diet. A similar control group were allowed free access to normal laboratory food. When given an oral fat load (1 ml triolein) plasma gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and triglyceride levels were significantly higher in the fat pretreated group. Inhibition of fat-stimulated GIP release by exogenous insulin was demonstrated in the untreated control group (plasma GIP: 663 +/- 49 versus 853 +/- 92 ng/l, mean +/- SEM p less than 0.025), but pretreatment with an oral fat load abolished this effect (plasma GIP: 1008 +/- 95 versus 1116 +/- 100 ng/l, p NS). Plasma glucose levels were significantly higher in fat pretreated rats given oral fat and intraperitoneal insulin compared with untreated controls (plasma glucose nadir 2.6 +/- 0.48 versus 1.6 +/- 0.15 mmol/l, p less than 0.05). Fat-pretreated rats showed significantly higher insulin and glucose levels compared with the untreated rats when given oral glucose (plasma insulin: 6.2 +/- 1.2 versus 2.5 +/- 0.59 micrograms/l, p less than 0.01; plasma glucose: 10.2 +/- 0.39 versus 8.9 +/- 0.41 mmol/l, p less than 0.025). Pretreatment of rats on a high fat diet causes (1) increased GIP secretion in response to an oral fat load, (2) abolition of the feed-back inhibition of exogenous insulin on fat-stimulated GIP release, and (3) some degree of insulin resistance.

Inhibition of gastric secretion by fat and hypertonic glucose in the dog: role of gastric inhibitory peptide

1. The gastric and intestinal phases of gastric secretion were selectively evoked by 'meals' of 5% liver extract or saline in five dogs provided with a special cannula that allowed complete separation of the stomach from the duodenum. 2. The gastric phase in response to liver extract administered into the stomach amounted to an increase in acid output equivalent to about 70% of the maximum output in response to histamine. There was also a significant rise in the concentration of gastrin but not of gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) in the serum. 3. The addition of fat (2 or 4% corn oil) or glucose (20%) to this liver extract meal inhibited secretion of gastric acid by 50 and 30%, respectively, without affecting the concentration of gastrin or GIP in the serum. 4. The 5% liver extract in the duodenum stimulated an increase in gastric acid output amounting to about 40% of the maximum response to histamine. Serum gastrin and GIP levels were not affected. Additional fat (0.5-4.0%) or glucose (10-20%) reduced acid secretion under these conditions by between 50 and 80% without affecting serum gastrin concentrations. Significant increases in the concentration of GIP in the serum occurred in response to intraduodenal glucose (5%), and to fat at the highest dose used (4%). 5. Intraduodenal infusions of glucose (5-20%) significantly increased serum GIP levels. Gastric secretion in response to 5% liver extract in the stomach was significantly inhibited at the highest dose (10 or 20%) although gastrin release was unaffected. 6. These results show that intraduodenal fat and glucose both exhibit potent inhibitory effects on post-prandial gastric acid secretion but that there is no correlation between the changes in serum GIP concentration and the inhibition of gastric secretion under these conditions. 7. We conclude that GIP is unlikely to mediate fat-induced inhibition of gastric secretion, but it is still possible that it might be involved in the inhibition that occurs during intestinal perfusion with hypertonic glucose solutions.

The effect of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide infused at physiological concentrations on the release of insulin in man

Blood glucose and the responses of insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) were measured in 12 healthy, normal weight subjects after drinking 50 g glucose. On a subsequent occasion each subject was given a simultaneous infusion of GIP and glucose to mimic the plasma concentrations observed in the first test. The peak GIP concentration after oral glucose was 22.3 +/- 1.9 pmol/l (mean +/- SEM), but was higher after GIP infusion at 36.3 +/- 4.6 pmol/l, (p less than 0.005). The blood glucose levels following oral glucose peaked at 6.3 +/- 0.5 mmol/l which was the same as seen after intravenous glucose. The insulin response to oral glucose was, however, far higher (431.3 +/- 58.2 pmol/l) than that obtained after GIP and glucose infusion (191.6 +/- 30.9 pmol/l, p less than 0.001). Thus it has not proved possible to explain completely the oral enhancement of insulin release by the action of GIP alone.

Immunocytochemical localization of hormone-producing cells within the pancreatic islets of the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri)

A histological study of the pancreatic islets in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri, was undertaken in which polypeptide hormones-producing cells were localized, using immunocytochemical staining techniques. Four different cell-types were identified in this manner. These were the insulin, somatostatin, pancreatic polypeptide and glucagon/gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) cells. The glucagon/GIP cell was designated thus as antisera to both hormones cross-reacted with a common population of cells. A fifth cell-type, commonly referred to as a clear cell, was also identified although its secretory product is as yet undetermined. These functional cell types were compared to the standard tinctorial properties of pancreatic endocrine cells. The relationships of the various cell types with each other was also observed.

Secretin release from the isolated, vascularly perfused pig duodenum

1. A method for the isolation and vascular perfusion of the porcine pancreas and duodenum was developed. 2. The oxygen consumption of the whole preparation was similar to that of the pancreas alone, and since the duodenal arteriovenous oxygen deficit was similar to that of the total preparation, it was concluded that the duodenum respired adequately. 3. The duodenum rapidly absorbed luminally administered radioactive glucose, and this absorption was strongly inhibited by ouabain and phloridzin. 4. The duodenum secreted secretin rapidly in response to hydrochloric acid, but did not respond to any other luminal stimuli, including lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and bile. Neither was secretin release stimulated by intra-arterially injected acetylcholine. 5. By gel permeation chromatography the release immunoreactive secretin behaved identically to pure natural secretin, indicating that the tissue form and the circulating form have identical molecular size. 6. It is concluded that this model offers an unique opportunity to study the endocrine secretion of the duodenum.

Reversal of impaired GIP and insulin secretion in patients with pancreatogenic steatorrhea following enzyme substitution

The influence of impaired digestion on nutrient induced release of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and insulin have been investigated in patients with chronic pancreatitis. All patients had massive steatorrhea (> 25 g/24 h), and glucose intolerance. A standard liquid test meal comprising fat and glucose were ingested with or without pancreatic enzyme substitution (9.0 g pancreatin). In the presence of pancreatin the response of serum levels of GIP to the test meal was significantly enhanced (81.2 vs 194.5 microgram/l X 180 min). Concurrently, the insulin response was augmented (3.4 vs 6.4 U/l X 180 min), resulting in improved glucose tolerance. Addition of pancreatin also significantly augmented the GIP response to oral fat (100 g), but not to oral glucose (100 g). In patients with pancreatogenic steatorrhea the insulin response to an IV glucose infusion (0.7 g/kg/h for 90 min) was augmented by oral fat only after addition of 9.0 g pancreatin to the fat load (3.5 vs 7.3 U/l X 180 min). After restoration of the GIP response to fat by pancreatin, the inhibitory effect of IV glucose on fat-induced GIP increase was restored. These data indicate that the GIP response to a mixed meal or triglycerides is dependent on the absorption of nutrients. In patients with chronic pancreatitis improvement of pancreatogenic insufficiency reverses the impaired GIP response, restores the incretin effect of fat, and improves glucose tolerance.

Interaction of fat-stimulated gastric inhibitory polypeptide on pancreatic alpha and beta cell function

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is considered to be the principal mediator of the enteroinsular axis. A glucose-insulin clamp technique was used to study the effects of differing blood glucose levels on the insulinotropic and glucagonotropic actions of fat-stimulated GIP in seven healthy subjects, as well as the effect of physiologic hyperinsulinemia on GIP secretion. Blood glucose levels were clamped for 4 h at 43+/-2 mg/dl (hypoglycemic clamp), 88+/-1 mg/dl (euglycemic clamp), and 141+/-2 mg/dl (hyperglycemic clamp) in the presence of a constant insulin infusion (100 m U/kg per h). Under hypoglycemic clamp conditions there was no increase in C-peptide nor glucagon after Lipomul ingestion, despite an increase of GIP of 51.7+/-8.7 ng/ml per 120 min. Under euglycemic clamp conditions, small and inconsistent increases in C-peptide and glucagon were observed after fat ingestion and a concomitant increase of GIP of 35.2+/-9.4 ng/ml per 120 min. Under hyperglycemic clamp conditions after fat ingestion and a GIP increase of 24.0+/-5.7 ng/ml per 120 min, C-peptide increased from 6.4+/-5 ng/ml to 11.0+/-1.1 ng/ml (P < 0.01) but glucagon did not change. These findings confirm that in healthy man GIP exerts its insulinotropic properties only under hyperglycemic conditions and indicate that GIP is not glucagonotropic. Under euglycemic clamp conditions (plasma glucose, 89+/-1 mg/dl) and physiologic hyperinsulinemia (serum immunoreactive insulin, 137+/-3 muU/ml) GIP responses to fat ingestion (39.7+/-9.8 ng/ml per 120 min) were not different from the GIP responses to fat ingestion in the absence of hyperinsulinemia (39.7+/-11.1 ng/ml per 120 min). Therefore, insulin under normoglycemic conditions does not exert an inhibitory effect on fat-stimulated GIP secretion. The higher GIP response to oral fat in the hypoglycemic clamp, and the lower GIP response in the hyperglycemic clamp compared to the response in the euglycemic clamp suggests an effect of glycemia itself on GIP secretion in the presence of hyperinsulinemia.

Oral glucose augmentation of insulin secretion. Interactions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide with ambient glucose and insulin levels

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide, or GIP, has been postulated as the major enteric hormonal mediator of insulin release. The release of immuno-reactive GIP (IR-GIP) after oral glucose and its role in insulin release was studied in normal men by the glucose clamp technique. In 24 subjects studied with the hyperglycemic clamp, blood glucose was maintained at 125 mg/dl above basal for 2 h via a primed-continuous IV glucose infusion coupled to a servo-controlled negative feedback system. 40 g glucose per m(2) surface area was ingested at 60 min, and the blood glucose was maintained at the steady-state hyperglycemic level. Plasma IR-GIP and insulin (IRI) levels were measured throughout the 2-h period. IR-GIP levels changed little when IV glucose alone was given; the mean basal value was 305+/-34 (SEM) pg/ml. After oral glucose, IR-GIP levels began to rise within 10 min and reached a peak within 40 min of 752+/-105 pg/ml. Plasma IRI responded initially to the square wave of hyperglycemia in the typical biphasic pattern. After oral glucose, plasma IRI levels rose strikingly above the elevated levels produced by hyperglycemia alone, reaching a peak of 170+/-15 muU/ml within 45 min. The time course of the rise in IR-GIP and IRI was nearly identical. To assess whether the maintenance of euglycemia would affect this process, the euglycemic clamp was employed in 11 subjects to maintain basal blood glucose levels during a similar 2-h study. A primed-continuous insulin infusion, with a constant rate of 120 mU/m(2) per min was given together with a servo-controlled glucose infusion. This resulted in hyper-insulinemia of approximately 300 muU/ml. Glucose was ingested by six subjects at 60 min. Plasma IR-GIP responded to oral glucose similarly to the effect seen in the hyperglycemic studies. No increase in endogenous insulin release was seen despite the increase in IR-GIP when euglycemia was maintained. However, in five of seven subjects given insulin whose blood glucose concentration rose by 20 mg/dl or more after oral glucose, there was an increase in plasma insulin concentration associated with the elevation in IR-GIP. Thus, the effect of glucose-released IR-GIP on insulin secretion is dependent upon the presence of some degree of hyper-glycemia and is not inhibited in the presence of marked hyperinsulinemia.

Response of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) to test meal in chronic pancreatitis--relationship to endocrine and exocrine insufficiency

Twenty-nine patients with chronic pancreatitis had a significantly greater IR-GIP response to a test meal than 15 controls. This increased response was not related to the degree of steatorrhoea or glucose intolerance. It was most marked in a group of patients with moderately impaired IRI release and medium steatorrhoea. From this is concluded that the IR-GIP response to a test meal is determined by at least two factors: 1. feedback control via insulin secretion, 2. assimilation of fat. In chronic pancreatitis endocrine insufficiency may induce an exaggerated GIP response and severe exocrine insufficiency may prevent fat induced GIP release. Gastrin is not involved in the different GIP response in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), gastrin and insulin: response to test meal in coeliac disease and after duodeno-pancreatectomy

The response of serum immunoreactive gastric inhibitory polypeptide (IR-GIP), gastrin (IRG) and insulin (IRI) to a mixed standard meal was measured in 15 controls, 6 patients with coeliac disease, 26 patients with chronic pancreatitis and partial duodenopancreatectomy (Whipple's procedure). Serum levels of IR-GIP, IRG and IRI were significantly reduced in patients with coeliac disease. The serum glucose increase was significantly smaller only during the first hour after the meal. Since small intestinal GIP- and G-cells are situated mainly in the glands of duodenal and jejunal mucosa their absolute number is not significantly reduced in coeliac disease. It is suggested that the release of IR-GIP and duodenal IRG is influenced by the rate of absorption of nutrients. In patients with chronic pancreatitis the IR-GIP release is significantly greater than in controls, the IRG release normal and the IRI response delayed. After Whipple's procedure the IR-GIP response is increased significantly while the IRG secretion is abolished. This demonstrates that the duodenum is not necessary for GIP release and that pancreatic and jejunal gastrin are without clinical significance.