An accurate and precise high-performance liquid chromatography method for the rapid quantification of the novel HIV integrase inhibitor raltegravir in human blood plasma after solid phase extraction

Concurrent administration with multivalent metal cation preparations or polycationic polymer preparations inhibits the absorption of raltegravir via its chelation

OBJECTIVES

Raltegravir (RAL) that can form chelates with multivalent metal cations shows lateral interactions with multivalent metal cation and polycationic polymer. We investigated the interactions of RAL with multivalent metal cation preparations, Al(OH)₃ and LaCO₃ , and polycationic polymer preparations, bixalomer (Bxl) and sevelamer (Svl).

METHODS

Immediately before the oral administration of 40 mg/kg RAL, the rats were administered orally with the vehicle, Al(OH)₃ , LaCO₃ , Bxl, or Svl, and the time course of RAL serum concentration was followed. The in vitro binding affinity of RAL with multivalent metal cation and polycationic polymer was also evaluated using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC).

RESULTS

When Al(OH)₃ , LaCO₃ , Bxl, or Svl was concomitantly administered with RAL, the maximum concentration and area under the curve were significantly lower than those when RAL was administered alone. ITC showed the interaction of RAL with Al(OH)₃ as an enthalpy-driven reaction and its interactions with LaCO₃ and Bxl as entropy-enthalpy mixed reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The interaction of RAL with Al(OH)₃ , LaCO_3, Bxl, or Svl can inhibit RAL absorption into the gastrointestinal tract, and thus, the multivalent metal cation and polycationic polymer are the modifying factors that can affect RAL pharmacokinetics.

Effect of HIV infection and menopause status on raltegravir pharmacokinetics in the blood and genital tract

BACKGROUND

This study describes first dose and steady state pharmacokinetics of raltegravir (RAL) in cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) and blood plasma (BP).

METHODS

Three cohorts of women were enrolled sequentially in a single-site, open-label pharmacokinetic study of oral raltegravir 400 mg twice daily: HIV-negative premenopausal, HIV-infected premenopausal and HIV-infected post-menopausal women. BP and CVF were collected over 12 h after a single observed dose and at steady state. RAL concentrations were measured by HPLC-MS methods. Data are expressed as median (IQR). The ANOVA rank-sum test was used to evaluate between-group differences in steady state raltegravir exposure (area under the concentration-time curve over the 12-h dosing interval [AUC0-12 h]).

RESULTS

First dose pharmacokinetics were obtained in HIV-negative premenopausal women and HIV-infected post-menopausal women only. The median (IQR) BP AUC0-12 h was 3,099 (985-5,959) and 4,239 (2,781-13,695) ng•h/ml and the median (IQR) CVF AUC0-12 h was 1,720 (305-5,288) and 13,797 (11,066-19,563) ng•h/ml for HIV-negative premenopausal and HIV-infected post-menopausal women, respectively. All cohorts contributed to steady-state pharmacokinetic profiles. Median (IQR) BP AUC0-12 h did not differ between the groups: 8,436 (3,080-10,111), 5,761 (1,801-10,095) and 6,180 (5,295-8,282) ng•h/ml in HIV-negative premenopausal, HIV-infected premenopausal and HIV-infected post-menopausal women, respectively. There was a trend for lower CVF AUC0-12 h among HIV-negative women 3,164 (1,156-9,540) compared to 11,465 (9,725-17,138) and 9,568 (4,271-24,306) ng•h/ml HIV-infected premenopausal and HIV-infected post-menopausal women, respectively, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.08). HIV-negative premenopausal women had a median (IQR) CVF:BP AUC0-12 h ratio of 0.46 (0.2-1.1), whereas HIV-infected premenopausal and post-menopausal women had median (IQR) CVF:BP AUC0-12 h ratio of 3.9 (1.2-6.7) and 1.4 (0.7-4.3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate RAL exposure in BP and CVF in premenopausal HIV-negative and pre- and post-menopausal HIV-infected women. These data indicate HIV and menopausal status may influence antiretroviral distribution into the female genital tract.

Is infant exposure to antiretroviral drugs during breastfeeding quantitatively important? A systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacokinetic studies

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to summarize antiretroviral drug concentrations in breast milk (BM) and exposure of breast-fed infants.

Methods

This was a systematic review of pharmacokinetic studies of HIV-positive women taking antiretrovirals that measured drugs in BM. The quality of pharmacokinetic and laboratory methods was assessed using pre-defined criteria. Pooled ratios and 95% CIs were calculated using the generalized inverse variance method and heterogeneity was estimated by the I² statistic. PubMed Central, SCOPUS and LactMed databases were searched. No date or language restrictions were applied. Searches were conducted up to 10 November 2014. Clinical relevance was estimated by comparing ingested dose with the recommended therapeutic dose for each drug.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included. There was substantial variability in the clinical and laboratory methods used and in reported results. Relative to maternal plasma (MP), NRTIs accumulate in BM, with BM : MP ratios (95% CI estimates) from 0.89 to 1.21 (14 studies, 1159 paired BM and MP samples). NNRTI estimates were from 0.71 to 0.94 (17 studies, 965 paired samples) and PI estimates were from 0.17 to 0.21 (8 studies, 477 paired samples). Relative to the recommended paediatric doses, a breast-fed infant may ingest 8.4% (95% CI 1.9–15.0), 12.5% (95% CI 2.6–22.3) and 1.1% (95% CI 0–3.6) of lamivudine, nevirapine and efavirenz, respectively, via BM.

Conclusions

Transfer to untreated infants appears quantitatively important for some NRTIs and NNRTIs. The pharmacokinetic methods varied widely and we propose standards for the design, analysis and reporting of future pharmacokinetic studies of drug transfer during breastfeeding.

Selective and rapid determination of raltegravir in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in the negative ionization mode

A selective and rapid high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for the quantification of raltegravir using raltegravir-d3 as an internal standard (IS). The analyte and IS were extracted with methylene chloride and n-hexane solvent mixture from 100 µL human plasma. The chromatographic separation was achieved on a Chromolith RP-18e endcapped C₁₈ (100 mm×4.6 mm) column in a run time of 2.0 min. Quantitation was performed in the negative ionization mode using the transitions of m/z 443.1→316.1 for raltegravir and m/z 446.1→319.0 for IS. The linearity of the method was established in the concentration range of 2.0-6000 ng/mL. The mean extraction recovery for raltegravir and IS was 92.6% and 91.8%, respectively, and the IS-normalized matrix factors for raltegravir ranged from 0.992 to 0.999. The application of this method was demonstrated by a bioequivalence study on 18 healthy subjects.

Raltegravir pharmacokinetics in treatment-naive patients is not influenced by race: results from the raltegravir early therapy in African-Americans living with HIV (REAL) study

Racial differences in antiretroviral treatment responses remain incompletely explained and may be a consequence of differential pharmacokinetics (PK) associated with race. Raltegravir, an inhibitor of HIV-1 integrase, is commonly used in the treatment of HIV-infected patients, many of whom are African-American. However, there are few data regarding the PK of raltegravir in African-Americans. HIV-infected men and women, self-described as African-American and naive to antiretroviral therapy were treated with raltegravir (RAL) at 400 mg twice a day, plus a fixed dose of tenofovir-emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) at 300 mg/200 mg once daily. Intensive PK sampling was conducted over 24 h at week 4. Drug concentrations at two trough values of 12 and 24 h after dosing (C(12) and C(24)), area under the concentration-curve values (AUC), maximum drug concentration (C(max)), and the time at which this concentration occurred (T(max)) in plasma were estimated with noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods and compared to data from a subset of white subjects randomized to the RAL twice a day (plus TDF/FTC) arm of the QDMRK study, a phase III study of the safety and efficacy of once daily versus twice daily RAL in treatment naive patients. A total of 38 African-American participants were enrolled (90% male) into the REAL cohort with the following median baseline characteristics: age of 36 years, body mass index (BMI) of 23 kg/m(2), and a CD4 cell count of 339/ml. Plasma HIV RNA levels were below 200 copies/ml in 95% of participants at week 4. The characteristics of the 16 white QDMRK study participants were similar, although fewer (69%) were male, the median age was higher (45 years), and BMI was lower (19 kg/m(2)). There was considerable interindividual variability in RAL concentrations in both cohorts. Median C(12) in REAL was 91 ng/ml (range, 10 to 1,386) and in QDMRK participants was 128 ng/ml (range, 15 to 1,074). The C(max) median concentration was 1,042 ng/ml (range, 196 to 10,092) for REAL and 1,360 ng/ml (range, 218 to 9,701) for QDMRK. There were no significant differences in any RAL PK parameter between these cohorts of African-American and white individuals. Based on plasma PK, and with similar adherence rates, the performance of RAL among HIV-infected African-Americans should be no different than that of infected patients who are white.

A sensitive liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry method for the intracellular and plasma quantification of raltegravir after solid-phase extraction

INTRODUCTION

Liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry for the quantification of raltegravir in human plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells has been developed.

METHODS

Sample preparations were based on a fully automated solid-phase extraction process. Mass spectrometric data were acquired in a single-ion monitoring method. Raltegravir and quinoxaline, the internal standard, were well separated in a gradient mode over 15 min.

KEY FINDINGS

Validation study exhibited excellent linearity, with good intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The assay was successfully applied to the raltegravir quantification in HIV-infected patients.

Quantifying the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir in female genital tract secretions using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection

Understanding the pharmacokinetics of drugs in peripheral body compartments, such as the genital tract, is particularly important in the infectious diseases arena. However, extracting drugs from small volumes of viscous, proteinacious substances like cervicovaginal fluid is particularly challenging. The goal of this study was to develop a method to quantify raltegravir, an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor, in the female genital tract. The method included sample preparation with perchloric acid followed by solid-phase extraction, separation with reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, and detection with an ultraviolet wavelength of 218nm. The method was linear from 0.05 to 10.0mg/L, with minimal endogenous interference. The method was accurate (1.2-11.0% deviation) and precise (1.1-12.6% CV) for both within and between-day analyses. The ability to detect raltegravir in the female genital tract is essential for future investigations of raltegravir as an agent for prevention of HIV acquisition, and this method will be used for clinical studies further evaluating pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in this body compartment.

Quantification of raltegravir (MK0518) in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection

A precise and accurate high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with photodiode array detection has been developed and validated for raltegravir, a human immunodeficiency virus integrase strand transfer inhibitor (HIV-1 INSTI). Plasma (300 microL) was extracted with dichloromethane/hexane 50:50 (v/v) after addition of the internal standard, 6,7-dimethyl-2,3-di(2-pyridyl) quinoxaline. The compounds were separated using a dC18 column and detected with ultraviolet detection at 320 nm. The limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL for raltegravir. The method was linear and validated over a concentration range of 0-10,000 ng/mL. The intra-day precision ranged from 3.1 to 12.3%, while the intra-day accuracy ranged from -15.0 to -0.5%, the inter-day precision and accuracy were less than 7%. The mean recovery was 76.8%. Application to clinical samples taken from patients treated with raltegravir indicated that the method is suitable for measuring plasma concentrations of raltegravir in pharmacokinetic studies of clinical trials.

Simultaneous determination of maraviroc and raltegravir in human plasma by HPLC-UV

Therapeutic drug monitoring is pivotal to improve the management of HIV infection. Here, a new HPLC-UV method to quantify simultaneously maraviroc and raltegravir levels in human plasma is reported. Remarkably, this is the first method for maraviroc determination in human plasma. The volume of the plasma sample was 600 microL. This method involved automated solid-phase extraction with Oasis HLB Cartridge 1 cc (30 mg divinylbenzene and N-vinylpyrrolidone) and evaporation in a water bath under nitrogen stream. The extracted samples were reconstituted with 200 microL 50/50 of mobile-phase solution (0.01 M KH(2)PO(4) and acetonitrile). Twenty microliters of these samples were injected into a HPLC-UV system, the analytes were eluted on an analytical dC18 Atlantis column (150 mm x 4.6 mm I.D.) with a particle size of 5 microm. The mobile phase (0.01 M KH(2)PO(4) and acetonitrile) was delivered at 1.0 mL/min with isocratic elution. The total run time for a single analysis was 10 min; maraviroc and raltegravir were detected by UV at 197 and 300 nm. The calibration curves were linear up to 2,500 ng/mL. The absolute recovery ranged between 93 and 100%. The HPLC-UV method reported here has been validated and is currently applied to monitor plasma levels of maraviroc and raltegravir in HIV-infected patients.