Sevoflurane-induced cardioprotection in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Randomised trial with clinical and ex-vivo endpoints

Rationale and Design of the IMPROVE Trial: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Blinded-endpoint Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

INTRODUCTION

Despite the appearance of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in the perioperative period still arouses concerns of clinicians. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is the process of repeated ischemia and reperfusion in the peripheral vessels, which is proven to reduce IRI in vital organs. However, the effect of RIC in patients undergoing off-pump CABG is still unclear.

METHODS

This IMPROVE trial is a national, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial designed to assess whether RIC intervention can improve short-term prognosis of patients undergoing off-pump CABG. It plans to enroll 648 patients who will be randomly assigned into a RIC group or control group. Patients in the RIC group will receive four cycles of 5 min of pressurization (about 200 mmHg) and 5 min of rest in the 3 days before and 7 days after the surgery.

PLANNED OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) within the 3-month follow-up. MACCE is defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06141525 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Appraisal of Postoperative Outcomes of Volatile and Intravenous Anesthetics: A Network Meta-Analysis of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative efficacy of specific regimens used as primary anesthetics, as well as the potential combination of volatile and intravenous anesthetics among patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic, and vascular surgery.

DESIGN

This frequentist, random-effects network meta-analysis was registered prospectively (CRD42022316328) and conducted according to the PRISMA-NMA framework. Literature searches were conducted up to April 1, 2022 across relevant databases. Risk of bias (RoB) and confidence of evidence were assessed by RoB-2 and CINeMA, respectively. Pooled treatment effects were compared with propofol monotherapy.

SETTING

Fifty-three randomized controlled trials (N = 8,085) were included, of which 46 trials (N = 6,604) enrolled patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

PARTICIPANTS

Trials enrolling adults (≥18) undergoing cardiac, thoracic, and vascular surgery, using the same induction regimens, and comparing volatile and/or total intravenous anesthesia for the maintenance of anesthesia. Given that the majority of trials focused on those undergoing cardiac surgery and the heterogeneity, analyses were restricted to this population.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Outcomes of interest included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), myocardial infarction, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, stroke, and delirium. Across 19 trials (N = 1,821; 9 arms; I2 = 64.5%), sevoflurane combined with propofol decreased ICU LOS (mean difference [MD] -18.26 hours; 95% CI -34.78 to -1.73 hours), whereas midazolam with propofol (MD 17.51 hours; 95% CI 2.78-32.25 hours) was associated with a significant increase in ICU LOS, when compared with propofol monotherapy. Among 27 trials (N = 4,080; 10 arms; I2 = 0%), midazolam was associated with significantly greater risk of myocardial infarction versus propofol (risk ratio 1.94; 95% CI 1.01-3.71). There were no significant differences across other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, sevoflurane with propofol was associated with decreased ICU LOS compared with propofol monotherapy. Midazolam with propofol increased ICU LOS compared with propofol alone. The combined use of intravenous and volatile anesthetics should be explored further. Future trials in thoracic and vascular surgery are warranted.

The Protective Effect of Sevoflurane Conditionings Against Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Trials in in-vivo Models

Objective

Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is a common and serious complication in clinical practice. Sevoflurane conditionings have been identified to provide a protection against myocardial IRI in animal experiments, but their true clinical benefits remain controversial. Here, we aimed to analyze the preclinical evidences obtained in animal models of myocardial IRI and explore the possible reasons for controversial clinical benefits.

Methods

Our primary outcome was the difference in mean infarct size between the sevoflurane and control groups in animal models of myocardial IRI. After searching the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, a systematic review retrieved 37 eligible studies, from which 28 studies controlled comparisons of sevoflurane preconditioning (SPreC) and 40 studies controlled comparisons of sevoflurane postconditioning (SPostC) that were made in a pooled random-effects meta-analysis. In total, this analysis included data from 313 control animals and 536 animals subject to sevoflurane conditionings.

Results

Pooled estimates for primary outcome demonstrated that sevoflurane could significantly reduce the infarct size after myocardial IRI whether preconditioning [weighted mean difference (WMD): −18.56, 95% CI: −23.27 to −13.85, P < 0.01; I² = 94.1%, P < 0.01] or postconditioning (WMD: −18.35, 95% CI: −20.88 to −15.83, P < 0.01; I² = 90.5%, P < 0.01) was performed. Interestingly, there was significant heterogeneity in effect size that could not be explained by any of the prespecified variables by meta-regression and stratified analysis. However, sensitivity analysis still identified the cardioprotective benefits of sevoflurane conditionings with robust results.

Conclusion

Sevoflurane conditionings can significantly reduce infarct size in in-vivo models of myocardial IRI. Given the fact that there is a lack of consistency in the quality and design of included studies, more well-performed in-vivo studies with the detailed characterization of sevoflurane protocols, especially studies in larger animals regarding cardioprotection effects of sevoflurane, are still required.

Isoflurane not at the expense of postoperative nausea and vomiting in cardiac anesthesia - an observational study

OBJECTIVES

Inhalative anesthesia is of common use, but is generally known to potentiate postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). With an internal change of anesthesia regimen from total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) to isoflurane (in terms of myocardial protection) in cardiac anesthesia a higher incidence of PONV was to be expected. Therefore, we evaluated the incidence of PONV after the simultaneous implementation of PONV prophylaxis.

METHODS

The incidence of PONV, prospectively assessed in 197 cardiac surgery patients (68 y ± 10.4, 66.5% male) having isoflurane plus dual PONV prophylaxis with dexamethasone and droperidol, was compared with previous data of 190 controls (67 y ± 9.6, 71% male) having TIVA without and with single or dual PONV prophylaxis (n = 64 dexamethasone and droperidol, n = 25 dexamethasone, n = 101 only TIVA), and the Apfel-scoring (0-4 depending on PONV-risk). DRKS00014275. Statistics: Chi²-test, p < .05 (Bonferroni).

RESULTS

The incidence of PONV under isoflurane with antiemetic prophylaxis was 20.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.4; 27.4) compared to 30.5% (95%CI 24; 37.6) under TIVA (p = .029; dexamethasone and droperidol 23.4% (95%CI 13.8; 35.7); dexamethasone 32% (95%CI 14.9; 53.5); only TIVA 34.7% (95%CI 25.5; 44.8)), but was not lower in high-risk patients than predicted according to Apfel-scoring 4 (71.4 vs. 78%).

CONCLUSION

In cardiac anesthesia, the use of isoflurane is not at the expense of PONV when using a risk-independent two-drug-prophylaxis. It is even beneficial resulting surprisingly in a lower incidence of PONV than under TIVA unless with and without prophylaxis. Patients with the highest risk for PONV and receiving isoflurane should receive a third antiemetic prophylactic drug.

THAP11 down-regulation may contribute to cardio-protective effects of sevoflurane anesthesia: Evidence from clinical and molecular evidence

This study aimed to explore the potential target of the cardio-protective effect induced by sevoflurane anesthesia based on evidence from clinical samples and in vitro model. Forty patients undergoing mitral valve replacement were randomly allocated to receive sevoflurane or propofol-based anesthesia. Atrial muscle specimens were collected from all patients, of which 5 were used to perform transcriptomics analysis. The cTn-I concentration was tested before, at the end of, and 24 h after surgery. In in vitro study, the expression level of the identified target gene, i.e., THAP11, was studied in H9C2 cells treated with sevoflurane or propofol. Then, we studied cell viability using CCK-8 staining, apoptosis by using flow cytometry, and cell death by lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH) detection in H9C2 cells exposed to oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) injury. THAP11 was the most significantly down-regulated gene in the transcriptomics analysis (P < 0.001), as confirmed in validation samples (P = 0.006). THAP11 mRNA levels in atrial muscle specimens were positively associated with cTn-I levels at 24-h postoperatively (determination coefficient = 0.564; P < 0.001). Sevoflurane treatment down-regulated THAP11 in H9C2 cell models, which promoted cell viability, inhibited cell apoptosis, and death in the OGD/R injury cell model. Up-regulation of THAP11 reduced the protective effect of sevoflurane treatment against OGD/R injury. Sevoflurane anesthesia down-regulates the expression of THAP11, which contributes to a cardio-protective effect. THAP11 down-regulation promotes cell viability, and inhibits cell apoptosis and death, thereby protecting again myocardial injury; it may therefore be a novel target for perioperative cardio-protection.

Pre- and Post-Conditioning of the Heart: An Overview of Cardioprotective Signaling Pathways

Since the discovery of ischemic pre- and post-conditioning, more than 30 years ago, the knowledge about the mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in these processes has significantly increased. In clinical practice, on the other hand, such advancement has yet to be seen. This article provides an overview of ischemic pre-, post-, remote, and pharmacological conditioning related to the heart. In addition, we reviewed the cardioprotective signaling pathways and therapeutic agents involved in the above-mentioned processes, aiming to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the advancements in the field. The advancements made over the last decades cannot be ignored and with the exponential growth in techniques and applications. The future of pre- and post-conditioning is promising.

Cardioprotective Effect of Anesthetics: Translating Science to Practice

Cardiovascular diseases are the number one cause of mortality in the world, particularly among the aging population. Major adverse cardiac events are also a major contributor to perioperative complications, affecting 2.6% of noncardiac surgeries and up to 18% of cardiac surgeries. Cardioprotective effects of volatile anesthetics and certain intravenous anesthetics have been well-documented in preclinical studies; however, their clinical application has yielded conflicting results in terms of their efficacy. Therefore, better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and developing effective ways to translate these insights into clinical practice remain significant challenges and unmet needs in the area. Several recent reviews have focused on mechanistic dissection of anesthetic-mediated cardioprotection. The present review focuses on recent clinical trials investigating the cardioprotective effects of anesthetics in the past five years. In addition to highlighting the main outcomes of these trials, the authors provide their perspectives about the current gap in the field and potential directions for future investigations.

The Impact of Anesthetic Regimen on Outcomes in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review

Despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative care, cardiac surgery still is burdened by relatively high mortality and frequent major postoperative complications, including myocardial dysfunction, pulmonary complications, neurologic injury, and acute kidney injury. Although the surgeon's skills and volume and patient- and procedure-related risk factors play a major role in the success of cardiac surgery, there is growing evidence that also optimizing perioperative care may improve outcomes significantly. The present review focuses on the aspects of perioperative care that are strictly related to the anesthesia regimen, with special reference to volatile anesthetics and neuraxial anesthesia, whose effect on outcome in adult cardiac surgery has been investigated extensively.

LncRNA Rik-203 contributes to anesthesia neurotoxicity via microRNA-101a-3p and GSK-3β-mediated neural differentiation

The mechanism of anesthesia neurotoxicity remains largely to be determined. The effects of long noncoding RNAs (LncRNAs) on neural differentiation and the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We thus identified LncRNA Rik-203 (C130071C03Rik) and studied its role on neural differentiation and its interactions with anesthetic sevoflurane, miRNA and GSK-3β. We found that levels of Rik-203 were higher in hippocampus than other tissues and increased during neural differentiation. Sevoflurane decreased the levels of Rik-203. Rik-203 knockdown reduced mRNA levels of Sox1 and Nestin, the markers of neural progenitor cells, and decreased the count of Sox1 positive cells. RNA-RNA pull-down showed that miR-101a-3p was highly bound to Rik-203. Finally, sevoflurane, knockdown of Rik-203, and miR-101a-3p overexpression all decreased GSK-3β levels. These data suggest that Rik-203 facilitates neural differentiation by inhibiting miR-101a-3p's ability to reduce GSK-3β levels and that LncRNAs would serve as the mechanism of the anesthesia neurotoxicity.

Role of microglia under cardiac and cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury

Both cerebral and cardiac ischemia causes loss of cerebral blood flow, which may lead to neuronal cell damage, neurocognitive impairment, learning and memory difficulties, neurological deficits, and brain death. Although reperfusion is required immediately to restore the blood supply to the brain, it could lead to several detrimental effects on the brain. Several studies demonstrate that microglia activity increases following cerebral and cardiac ischemic/reperfusion (I/R) injury. However, the effects of microglial activation in the brain following I/R remains unclear. Some reports demonstrated that microglia were involved in neurodegeneration and oxidative stress generation, whilst others showed that microglia did not respond to I/R injury. Moreover, microglia are activated in a time-dependent manner, and in a specific brain region following I/R. Recently, several therapeutic approaches including pharmacological interventions and electroacupuncture showed the beneficial effects, while some interventions such as hyperthermia and hyperoxic resuscitation, demonstrated the deteriorated effects on the microglial activity after I/R. Therefore, the present review summarized and discussed those studies regarding the effects of global and focal cerebral as well as cardiac I/R injury on microglia activation, and the therapeutic interventions.